DOCSLIB.ORG

Description of Records of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Description of Records of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration The National Archives At Atlanta Description of Records of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Research Room Hours: 8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Monday to Friday National Archives at Atlanta 5780 Jonesboro Rd. Morrow, GA 30260 National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (Predecessor) Special Program Files Regarding Weather ............................................................................................................... 4 George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Administration Program and Support, ..................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Services Division ................................................................................................................................ 5 Advanced System Office.............................................................................................................................................. 5 Astrionics Laboratory ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Astronautics Laboratory ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Central System Engineering ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Engine Program Office ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Engineering and Documentation ................................................................................................................................ 6 Facilities and Design Office ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Industrial Operations .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Management Services Office ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Office of Manned Space Flight, Executive Staff ....................................................................................................... 9 Office of Manned Space Flight, Launch Operations Directorate, Directorate of Design Engineering .............. 10 Office of Manned Space Flight, Office of the Director ........................................................................................... 10 Office of the Director ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Office of the Director, Program Development ........................................................................................................ 13 Operations Office ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Payloads Project Office, Tethered Satellite System Project Office ....................................................................... 14 Program Development Office ................................................................................................................................... 14 Propulsion and Vehicle Engineering Laboratory ................................................................................................... 15 Public Affairs Office .................................................................................................................................................. 15 Reactor in Flight Project Office ............................................................................................................................... 17 Requirements and Integration Division ................................................................................................................... 17 Research and Development Office ........................................................................................................................... 17 Research and Technology Projects Branch ............................................................................................................. 18 Research Planning Office .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Resource Management Office ................................................................................................................................... 18 Saturn Apollo Program Office ................................................................................................................................. 19 Saturn I/IB Program Office ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Saturn IU/GSE Office ............................................................................................................................................... 20 Saturn Program Office .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Saturn Projects Office ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Saturn S-IVB Stage Project Office ........................................................................................................................... 25 Saturn V Program Office .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Science and Engineering Office ................................................................................................................................ 26 Skylab Program Office .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Skylab Projects Office ............................................................................................................................................... 29 Solid Rocket Engineer's Office ................................................................................................................................. 31 Space Science Project Office ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Space Station Projects Office .................................................................................................................................... 32 Spacelab Project Office, Office of the Program Engineer...................................................................................... 32 Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory ........................................................................................................ 33 Technical Services Office .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Technical Staff Office ................................................................................................................................................ 33 Technology Utilization Office ................................................................................................................................... 33 2 John F. Kennedy Space Center Administrative Services Office ................................................................................................................................. 34 Administrative Services Office, Issuance and Forms Management Section ......................................................... 34 Directorate of Design Engineering ........................................................................................................................... 34 Directorate of Design Engineering, Project Integration Office, LC-39 Area Management Branch .................. 35 Directorate of Design Engineering, Requirements and Resources Office, Real Estate Branch.......................... 35 Directorate of Technical Support ............................................................................................................................. 35 Installation Support Directorate, Documentation and Data Management Branch ............................................. 35 Launch Vehicle Operations Office ........................................................................................................................... 36 Office of Chief Counsel ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Office of the Deputy Director ................................................................................................................................... 36 Office of the Director ................................................................................................................................................. 36 Office of the Director of Information Systems ........................................................................................................ 37 Office of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Rocket Technology
    CHAPTER 1 History of Rockets 1. 1. INTRODUCTION Action-Reaction Principle Take any technology and you always find that its practical demonstration had been realized much before the theory was established. However, you may note that the fast and effective refinement of a technology begins only after its theory, explaining the underlying basic principles, has been established. The action-reaction principle that is fundamental to jet propulsion, which includes airbreathing- as well as rocket-propulsion, was theoretically explained only in 1687 by the English scientist Sir Isaac Newton by his famous publication “Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (“Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”). But, approximately 2100 years before this, Archytas, a Greek philosopher, mathematician, astronomer, statesman, and strategist, had demonstrated the action-reaction principle by his toy pigeon in the city of Tarentum, Fig. 1. 1. Archytas suspended on a wire his wooden pigeon that contained hot steam at an elevated pressure in its belly cavity. The other end of the wire was hooked on to the top of a tall pole. On releasing a plug, a jet of steam escaped through a hole from the rear of the pigeon to produce a thrust that made the toy pigeon fly in circles around the pole. Thus Archytas mystified and amused the citizens of Tarentum by his flying toy- pigeon and demonstrated the fundamental principle of propulsion: “every force has an equal and opposite reaction”. The second recorded-demonstration of the action-reaction principle was in the first century B.C. Hero of Alexandria, a Greek mathematician 1 and scientist, constructed a device known as aeolipile.
    [Show full text]
  • PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, and the V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ENGINEERING CONSENT: PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael Brian Petersen, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Jeffrey Herf Departmen t of History This dissertation is the story of the German scientists and engineers who developed, tested, and produced the V-2 missile, the world’s first liquid -fueled ballistic missile. It examines the social, political, and cultural roots of the prog ram in the Weimar Republic, the professional world of the Peenemünde missile base, and the results of the specialists’ decision to use concentration camp slave labor to produce the missile. Previous studies of this subject have been the domain of either of sensationalistic journalists or the unabashed admirers of the German missile pioneers. Only rarely have historians ventured into this area of inquiry, fruitfully examining the history of the German missile program from the top down while noting its admi nistrative battles and technical development. However, this work has been done at the expense of a detailed examination of the mid and lower -level employees who formed the backbone of the research and production effort. This work addresses that shortcomi ng by investigating the daily lives of these employees and the social, cultural, and political environment in which they existed. It focuses on the key questions of dedication, motivation, and criminality in the Nazi regime by asking “How did Nazi authori ties in charge of the missile program enlist the support of their employees in their effort?” “How did their work translate into political consent for the regime?” “How did these employees come to view slave labor as a viable option for completing their work?” This study is informed by traditions in European intellectual and social history while borrowing from different methods of sociology and anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 13 Mission Review
    APOLLO 13 MISSION REVIEW HEAR& BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS SECOR’D SESSION JUR’E 30, 1970 Printed for the use of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47476 0 WASHINGTON : 1970 COMMITTEE ON AEROKAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES CLINTON P. ANDERSON, New Mexico, Chairman RICHARD B. RUSSELL, Georgia MARGARET CHASE SMITH, Maine WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washington CARL T. CURTIS, Nebraska STUART SYMINGTON, bfissouri MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon JOHN STENNIS, Mississippi BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona STEPHEN M.YOUNG, Ohio WILLIAM B. SAXBE, Ohio THOJfAS J. DODD, Connecticut RALPH T. SMITH, Illinois HOWARD W. CANNON, Nevada SPESSARD L. HOLLAND, Florida J4MES J. GEHRIG,Stad Director EVERARDH. SMITH, Jr., Professional staffMember Dr. GLENP. WILSOS,Professional #tad Member CRAIGVOORHEES, Professional Staff Nember WILLIAMPARKER, Professional Staff Member SAMBOUCHARD, Assistant Chief Clerk DONALDH. BRESNAS,Research Assistant (11) CONTENTS Tuesday, June 30, 1970 : Page Opening statement by the chairman, Senator Clinton P. Anderson-__- 1 Review Board Findings, Determinations and Recommendations-----_ 2 Testimony of- Dr. Thomas 0. Paine, Administrator of NASA, accompanied by Edgar M. Cortright, Director, Langley Research Center and Chairman of the dpollo 13 Review Board ; Dr. Charles D. Har- rington, Chairman, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel ; Dr. Dale D. Myers, Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, and Dr. Rocco A. Petrone, hpollo Director -___________ 21, 30 Edgar 11. Cortright, Chairman, hpollo 13 Review Board-------- 21,27 Dr. Dale D. Mvers. Associate Administrator for Manned SDace 68 69 105 109 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIOSS 1. Internal coinponents of oxygen tank So. 2 ---_____-_________________ 22 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Space Flight Center
    ............__........ Marshall Space Flight Center Introduction This booklet, prepared by the Marshall Space Flight Center, is illustrative of the Center's support for the von Braun Celebration of the Arts and Sciences (VBCAS). Marshall is honored to be a participant in the celebration of this 50-year cultural and technological legacy of Dr. Wernher von Braun and the members of his famed German rocket team. The VBCAS features a year-long series of events, performances, exhibits and historical, cultural and educational programs. Special performances by internationally known artists and speakers, and commemorative events featuring an aerospace, German, or nostalgic theme will be held during this year-long celebration. More than 30 arts, technology, educational and community organizations have been working for almost three years to plan this series of events. In 1950, Dr. von Braun and approximately 100 of his team members came to Huntsville, Alabama, to begin work on what would later become America's historic space program. Dr. von Braun eventually served as the first director of the Marshall Center and led the development of the Saturn V launch vehicle that lofted three American astronauts on their journey to the moon in July 1969. music. In the 1920s, von Braun was accepted for led the piano lessons by the great composer Paul design for the most powerful rocket the world has Hindemith and had even composed some pieces of ever known and used it to launch the first humans his own by the age of 15. Von Braun also took cello to the surface of the moon in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Auburn University – Romance, Rocketry, and the Dannenberg Connection
    Auburn University – Romance, Rocketry and the Dannenberg Connection Auburn University – Romance, Rocketry, and the Dannenberg Connection Dr. Joseph Majdalani, faculty advisor at Auburn University Auburn University is not only known for its campus beauty, college romance, and passion for football, but also for its celebrated history in aeronautics, its love for rocketry, its faithful devotion to the AIAA community, and its intimate connection with the Wright Brothers and the Dannenberg family. This year was particularly romantic as it seems to have started and ended with two totally unrelated events, which nonetheless involved Auburn‟s incoming Chair for Aerospace Engineering, Dr. Joe Majdalani, and two distinguished members of Konrad Dannenberg‟s immediate family, whose association with Auburn University dates back to the Apollo era: Dr. Klaus Dannenberg, „67 Auburn Aerospace Engineering and AIAA Deputy Executive Director, for the SciTech Award Banquet, and Jacquelyn (Jackie) Dannenberg, wife of Konrad Dannenberg, for the awarding of the Konrad Dannenberg Educator of the Year Award in Huntsville. LTR: Konrad and Klaus Dannenberg at the Auburn Alumni Engineering Council Meeting (April 2007). The year also encompassed a number of developments and recognitions, such as a record participation in the AIAA Region II Student Conference with 20 Auburn students, a first place award capture in both undergraduate and graduate divisions of the 65th AIAA Southeastern Regional Conference, a first place award ranking among all seven regions of AIAA
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Paperclip and the Contrasting Fates of Wernher Von Braun and Arthur Rudolph
    VEIL OF PROTECTION: OPERATION PAPERCLIP AND THE CONTRASTING FATES OF WERNHER VON BRAUN AND ARTHUR RUDOLPH Allison Eldridge-Nelson A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2017 Committee: Walter Grunden, Advisor Benjamin Greene © 2017 Allison Eldridge-Nelson All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Walter Grunden, Advisor Toward the end of World War II, the United States government initiated Operation Paperclip which set out to secretly secure the top rocket scientists from Nazi Germany. To accomplish this, officials manipulated policy procedures, covered their tracks, and years later misrepresented their knowledge of the project’s details. The resulting problematic immigration policy enabled the government to allow former Nazi scientists to travel to the U.S. and be employed by the military well ahead of executive approval, and amidst strong dissent. This thesis will take these arguments a step further by contextualizing it within two personal narratives of participants of Operation Paperclip. The two examined scientists, Wernher von Braun and his colleague Arthur L. Rudolph, became highly regarded in their field and were bestowed with public praise, titles, and awards, yet their fates were drastically different. As this thesis tracks the constantly shifting immigration policy that was shaped by America’s national interests in the immediate post-WWII era, it will explain the unchecked and unstable procedures that resulted in skewed perceptions of von Braun and Rudolph. Although von Braun worked alongside Rudolph, and held powerful positions of authority, his prominence and importance to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Qualities in Grand System Building
    LOCAL ENGINEERING IN THE EARLY AMERICAN AND JAPANESE SPACE PROGRAMS: HUMAN QUALITIES IN GRAND SYSTEM BUILDING Yasushi Sato A DISSERTATION in History and Sociology of Science Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2005 ______________________________ Supervisor of Dissertation ______________________________ Graduate Group Chairperson ii COPYRIGHT Yasushi Sato 2005 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted, first and foremost, to my three academic advisors in the History and Sociology of Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, for the completion of this dissertation. Prof. Robert E. Kohler, my dissertation supervisor, constantly provided me with inspiration and encouragement while I did research and writing. His seminar on scientific practice spawned initial ideas for my inquiry, and his confidence in my research agenda let me proceed. Prof. Nathan Sivin principally guided me through the first three years of my graduate study into the dissertation period. His kind support for, and careful critique of, my work sustained my motivation all the time. Prof. Ruth Schwartz Cowan offered me insightful comments on chapters after she joined the department. She also gave me helpful advices on sources, writing, and journal publication. Graduate work in the United States was truly a long journey for me. When I first joined the department, I had never lived outside of Japan, and I did not even know what such words as “footnotes” and “primary sources” meant. As I gradually learned things, I received much help from people in the department. Prof. Emily Thompson taught me the basics of the history of technology, and let me have an idea of what historical research is.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2018
    The Marshall Retiree Report November 2018 NASA/MSFC Retiree Association P. O. Box 4492, Huntsville, Alabama 35815 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quarterly MRA Social Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at The Ledges Social & Registration: 6:00 p.m. – Dinner: 7:00 p.m. $30.00 per person Menu: Garden Salad, Sliced Roast Turkey with Cornbread Dressing, Sweet Potato Casserole, Sauteed Green Beans, Dinner Rolls, Coffee & Tea, Dessert: Southern Pecan Pie Please RSVP to Bennie Jacks no later than noon on Friday, December 7, 2018, at [email protected] or cell phone: 256-603-0894. A 72-hour cancellation notice is required by the Ledges. Program: No speaker is scheduled to allow time for members to socialize and for storytelling. From Parker’s Desk…………………… Recently, I was in Morris Auditorium for a Fire and Smoke discussion moderated by Gene Goldman with panel members Gary Lyles, Robert Lightfoot and Patrick Scheuermann. Looking around that room at all our past Center Directors’ portraits, I thought it would be appropriate that we should have a record in our MRA Newsletter files listing the names and service dates of our first 13 center directors. They were: 1) Wernher von Braun, 7/1960-1/1970; 2) Eberhard Rees, 3/1970-1/1973; 3) Rocco Petrone, 1/1973-3/1974; 4) William R. Lucas, 6/1974-6/1986; 5) JR Thompson, 9/1986- 7/1989; 6) Jack Lee, 7/1989-1/1994; 7) Porter Birdwell, 1/1994-2/1996; 8) Wayne Littles, 2/1996-6/1998; Art Stephenson, 9/1998-6/2003; 10) David King, 6/2003-4/2009; 11) Robert Lightfoot, 8/2009-8/2012; 12) Patrick Scheuermann, 9/2012-12/2015; 13) Todd May, 2/2016-7/2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter 296KB
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 EBERHARD F. M. REES 236 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 EBERHARD F. M. REES 237 EBERHARD F. M. REES 1908-1998 BY ROBERT C. SEAMANS, JR. EBERHARD EM. REES, a member of Wernher von Braun's team that designed the rockets used for the lunar landing in 1969, died April 2, 1998, one month short of his ninetieth birthday at a hospital in Florida. Eberhard was born in Trossingen, Germany, on April 28, 1908. He received the bachelor of science degree from the Technical University, Stuttgart, in 1931 and the master of science degree from the Technical University, Dresden, in 1934. After graduation he became an engineer at a steel foundry in Leipzig, Germany, where he gained experience as a manager of technology. During the same period that Eberhard was matriculating and commencing his first job, a team headed by Captain Walter Dornberger and Dr. Wernher von Braun were experimenting with liquid-fueled rockets first at Kummersdorf near Berlin and then on Usedom Island in the Baltic. What had been the small fishing village of Peenemunde at the northern end of the island became a full- scale center for developing a variety of missile systems. Throughout most of World War II, Dornberger split his time between Berlin and Peenemunde, and von Braun was the full-time technical director of the missile center. By 1940, Germany had conquered Poland and was at war with England and France. By then at Peenemunde, a number of missiles were under development including a ballistic missile designated A-4 by the Germans and V-2 by the Allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Travel at 1G: Space Tourism in Cold War America
    SPACE TRAVEL AT 1G: SPACE TOURISM IN COLD WAR AMERICA by Emily Ann Margolis A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March, 2019 © 2019 Emily A. Margolis All Rights Reserved Abstract Although tourism in space is a 21st-century phenomenon, spaceflight has been a part of American leisure culture since the late 1950s. The space age dawned in the golden age of the family road trip. Americans ventured from home in pursuit of pleasure in greater numbers in the postwar period than at any previous time in the nation’s history. Some of these vacationing motorists made unprompted detours to field centers of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), specifically those engaged in preparations for the nation’s human spaceflight program. In response to the spontaneous appearance of space tourists, NASA centers developed ad-hoc visitor programs and enterprising business people in the surrounding communities seized on space as the central theme for their existing tourism promotion efforts. The result was a proliferation of space-themed tourist attractions and amenities—museums, halls of fame, heritage trails, theme parks, and motels—across the American South in the 1950s and 60s. This dissertation project explores the production and patronage of space attractions in the first decade of human spaceflight. I argue that these sites represent the efforts of individuals and institutions to render spaceflight relevant to their lives. Mass tourism to space attractions offers a new opportunity to examine the role of spaceflight in American society. The most active form of public engagement with space, space tourism has been all but neglected by cultural scholars of the space age.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter 821KB
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 19 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 19 EDGAR M. CORTRIGHT 1923–2014 Elected in 1973 “Innovative leadership in aerospace research and development and in its practical application to significant national problems.” BY JAMES M. FREE SUBMITTED BY THE NAE HOME SECRETARY EDGAR MAURICE CORTRIGHT, a skilled engineer and manager of multifaceted space programs and organizations at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), passed away on May 4, 2014, in Scarborough, Maine, at 90 years of age. His most significant accomplishments include establish- ment of the nation’s first meteorological satellite and space probe programs; supervision of Viking, the first spacecraft to land on Mars; and direction of the Langley Research Center during the transitional period in the early 1970s. Ed’s government career began as a research engineer at the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA)’s Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory, where he investigated aerodynamic issues with high-speed inlets and nozzles and headed activities in supersonic wind tunnels. In 1957 he was selected for a series of space-related planning committee proj- ects that led to his transfer to headquarters in 1958. There he had responsibility for establishing NASA’s initial satellite and space exploration programs. Throughout the 1960s he was a James M. Free is director of the Glenn Research Center where Ed Cortright spent the early years of his career. Robert Arrighi, historian and research associate at the Glenn Research Center, compiled the infor- mation used to prepare this tribute. 75 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Meine 12 Jahre Mit Wernher Von Braun
    Meine 12 Jahre mit Wernher von Braun Zum 100. Geburtstag des genialen Raketenbauers Am 23. März dieses Jahres feiern zahlreiche Menschen, die das Privileg hatten, ihn zu kennen, Wernher von Brauns 100. Geburtstag. Zu ihnen gehöre auch ich, denn unter seiner Leitung im von Braun‘schen „Rocket Team“ in Huntsville habe ich die besten Jahre meines Lebens verbracht, und danach noch mehrere Jahre in Washington in seinem Umfeld, bis zu seinem frühen Tod 1977. Als ich im Sommer 1962 als frischgebackener Diplomingenieur mit dem druckfrischen Diplom der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen nach Huntsville kam, geschah dies auf eine telegraphische Einladung von Dr. von Braun an den jungen Studenten, der die Auswanderung nach USA plante, weil sein Interessengebiet in Deutschland weder Gegenwart noch Zukunft hatte: "Gehen Sie nicht in die Industrie. Kommen Sie nach Huntsville. Wir fliegen zum Mond." Bei meiner Ankunft auf der holprigen Rollbahn des kleinen eingezäunten Landflugplatzes in Alabama betrat ich eine Welt, wie es sie nie zuvor gegeben hat noch jemals wieder geben wird. Die Hochburg der Raketenbauer lag eingebettet in einer einzigartigen Landschaft von Baumwollfeldern, Magnolienbäumen und roter Lehmerde. Das am Ortsrand stolz als "Rocket City, USA" ausgewiesene, mit gleichem Stolz aber auch als "Heart of Dixie" (Herz des südstaatlichen Dixielands) beschilderte Nest Huntsville war der Ort, wo "der Weltraum begann", wie es hieß. Alles was in der US- Raumfahrt heute als selbstverständlich hingenommen wird, hatte seinen Anfang hier, im "Space Capital of the Universe", wie sich die lokale Handelskammer und HIEC, das Huntsville Industrial Expansion Committee, gerne brüsteten. Gerade erst 15 Monate vor meiner Ankunft hatte Präsident John F.
    [Show full text]