DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Qualities in Grand System Building

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Qualities in Grand System Building LOCAL ENGINEERING IN THE EARLY AMERICAN AND JAPANESE SPACE PROGRAMS: HUMAN QUALITIES IN GRAND SYSTEM BUILDING Yasushi Sato A DISSERTATION in History and Sociology of Science Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2005 ______________________________ Supervisor of Dissertation ______________________________ Graduate Group Chairperson ii COPYRIGHT Yasushi Sato 2005 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted, first and foremost, to my three academic advisors in the History and Sociology of Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, for the completion of this dissertation. Prof. Robert E. Kohler, my dissertation supervisor, constantly provided me with inspiration and encouragement while I did research and writing. His seminar on scientific practice spawned initial ideas for my inquiry, and his confidence in my research agenda let me proceed. Prof. Nathan Sivin principally guided me through the first three years of my graduate study into the dissertation period. His kind support for, and careful critique of, my work sustained my motivation all the time. Prof. Ruth Schwartz Cowan offered me insightful comments on chapters after she joined the department. She also gave me helpful advices on sources, writing, and journal publication. Graduate work in the United States was truly a long journey for me. When I first joined the department, I had never lived outside of Japan, and I did not even know what such words as “footnotes” and “primary sources” meant. As I gradually learned things, I received much help from people in the department. Prof. Emily Thompson taught me the basics of the history of technology, and let me have an idea of what historical research is. Prof. Nathan Sivin, Prof. Mark B. Adams, Dr. Pap Ndiaye, and Dr. Arne Hessenbruch made it easy for me to adjust to the new environment in the beginning. Prof. M. Susan Lindee supervised one of my orals examination fields. Fellow graduate students, Jeffrey D. Tang, Eve E. Buckley, Jeremy A. Vetter, Philip Cho, Alex Checkovich, among others, iv had stimulating discussions with me and helped me in many other indispensable ways. Joyce F. Roselle, Patricia A. Johnson, and Ernestine Williams provided always friendly and reliable administrative support. As I began research on the history of American space programs, I met a number of scholars in the field. I benefited from suggestions from Prof. Howard E. McCurdy of American University, Prof. John M. Logsdon of the George Washington University, Prof. Stephen B. Johnson of the University of North Dakota, Prof. Andrew J. Dunar and Prof. Stephen B. Waring of the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Prof. James H. Capshew of Indiana University, and Dr. Roger D. Launius and Dr. Sylvia K. Kraemer of NASA headquarters. At the archives that I visited, I received help from Ms. Jane H. Odom, Mr. Stephen J. Garber, Ms. Nadine J. Andreassen, Mr. Colin Fries, and Mr. John Hargenrader of the NASA History Office, Mr. Robert Jaques of the Marshall Space Flight Center, Ms. Anne Coleman of the University of Alabama, Huntsville, Mr. Glen E. Swanson of the Johnson Space Center, Ms. Shelly Henley Kelly of the University of Houston at Clear Lake, Mr. Russell Custonguay of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Archives, Ms. Elizabeth A. Booker of the Goddard Space Flight Center, and Mr. Michael Waesche of the National Archive’s Washington National Record Center. On the Japanese side, Prof. Takehiko Hashimoto of the University of Tokyo let me belong to his research office while I conducted research in Tokyo in summer 2003. Prof. Shigeru Nakayama of Kanagawa University provided me with useful advices on my research. Mr. Sakae Shiota of the National Space Development Agency of Japan and Mr. Houichi Minezaki and Mr. Katsumi Watanabe of the Japan Space Forum introduced me v to written sources. Mr. Teru Aruga, Mr. Akira Kubozono, and Dr. Yasuhiro Kuroda of the National Space Development Agency of Japan as well as Dr. Yasuhiro Morita of the Institute of Space and Astronomical Science, in particular, helped me organize interviews for my research. All the interviewees were extremely friendly and cooperative, and gave me their recollections to the full extent. I received various institutional and financial support during my stay in the United States. The Science and Technology Agency of Japan supported the first two years of my study here. In the following years, I received grants and fellowships from the Toyota Foundation, the Matsushita International Foundation, the Honjo International Scholarship Foundation, and the American Historical Association. Such support made it possible for me to continue research and make many trips to archives. I was able to complete my graduate work away from my native country due to the support of those who were around me. Besides the hospitality of the department that I belonged to, I received support and encouragement from my family and many Japanese friends in Philadelphia and in Japan. I am especially fortunate that my fiancé, Ms. Yuko Machida, whom I met late in my journey, and I can return to Japan together and continue research in the fields of our choice. vi ABSTRACT LOCAL ENGINEERING IN THE EARLY AMERICAN AND JAPANESE SPACE PROGRAMS: HUMAN QUALITIES IN GRAND SYSTEM BUILDING Yasushi Sato Robert E. Kohler After the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was created in 1958, its field centers, located across the United States, started to carry out the nation’s civilian space programs. This dissertation examines four of those NASA centers and two Japanese space development institutions as local engineering communities and analyzes their engineering styles. These local communities had diverse institutional origins, and featured unique engineering styles suited to their social structures. Their engineering processes were generally loose and opaque, characterized by orientation for empirical judgments, emphasis on human discretion, and weakness in formal command lines. As they carried out large-scale national projects, however, they faced pressures to adopt a new mode of engineering that embraced formalized, standardized, document-intensive methods, with systems engineering at its core. They reluctantly came to practice the new methods, but did not easily accept the values associated with them, such as centralized vii control, clarity, rigorous optimization, universality, predictability, and accountability. Such rationalistic, depersonalizing values were threatening to the social structure of the local communities where many human particularities existed. The central issue in this dissertation is the cultural conflict between various local engineering styles and the centralized, universal mode of engineering. While historians of technology have studied such conflicts for the periods before World War II, very few of them have dealt with this issue in the large system building in the Cold War period. This dissertation demonstrates that the local engineering communities which developed large-scale, highly complex technological systems for space exploration depended on human-oriented engineering practices and assumptions, and that they found the rational, depersonalized style of new engineering incompatible with their styles. In order to show that engineers who practiced those different styles of engineering also lived in distinct social worlds, this dissertation looks into the social components of their engineering communities such as reward structures, interpersonal relationships, career expectations, and institutional identities and allegiances. While the lives of systems engineers were shaped by constant mobility and aspiration for upward advancement, those of local engineers were woven in stable communities. Behind their distinct engineering styles were their different social values and assumptions. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iii Abstract vi List of Illustrations xi Introduction Changing Engineering Styles of Local Engineering Communities in Postwar America and Japan 1 Local Engineering Communities and the State 5 Systems Engineering and Technocracy 11 Japanese Engineering and Human Orientation 23 Local Engineering Styles and Their Changes 29 Chapter 1 Wernher von Braun and Engineering Practices at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), 1960-1965 37 In-House Engineering Capability at ABMA, 1956-1960 44 Defending the In-House Capability, 1960-1964 54 Defending against Systems Engineering, 1962-1965 66 Conservatism and Reliability, 1960-1965 83 The Unity and Integrity of the In-House Capability 97 ix Chapter 2 Systems and Humans in the Development of the Apollo Spacecraft at the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC), 1960-1969 103 The Formation of MSC, 1960-1963 108 Managing the Spacecraft Development, 1963-1966 121 Manning the Apollo System, 1963-1966 134 The Fire and the Recovery, 1967-1969 150 Systems Engineers and Local Engineers 159 Chapter 3 The Reform of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in the Cold War, 1960-1967 167 JPL a University Laboratory, 1960-1962 174 Pressure from NASA Headquarters, 1962 185 More Pressure from NASA and Congress, 1962-1964 196 JPL as a Reformed Laboratory, 1964-1967 213 Academic Values and State Control 222 Chapter 4 Values of Science and Engineering at the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), 1958-1970 229 Scientific and Engineering Origins of GSFC, 1958-1961 234 Goett’s Lone Battle for the Center, 1961-1965 250 Persistent Values of Scientists, 1965-1970 261 GSFC as a National Center
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Rocket Technology
    CHAPTER 1 History of Rockets 1. 1. INTRODUCTION Action-Reaction Principle Take any technology and you always find that its practical demonstration had been realized much before the theory was established. However, you may note that the fast and effective refinement of a technology begins only after its theory, explaining the underlying basic principles, has been established. The action-reaction principle that is fundamental to jet propulsion, which includes airbreathing- as well as rocket-propulsion, was theoretically explained only in 1687 by the English scientist Sir Isaac Newton by his famous publication “Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (“Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”). But, approximately 2100 years before this, Archytas, a Greek philosopher, mathematician, astronomer, statesman, and strategist, had demonstrated the action-reaction principle by his toy pigeon in the city of Tarentum, Fig. 1. 1. Archytas suspended on a wire his wooden pigeon that contained hot steam at an elevated pressure in its belly cavity. The other end of the wire was hooked on to the top of a tall pole. On releasing a plug, a jet of steam escaped through a hole from the rear of the pigeon to produce a thrust that made the toy pigeon fly in circles around the pole. Thus Archytas mystified and amused the citizens of Tarentum by his flying toy- pigeon and demonstrated the fundamental principle of propulsion: “every force has an equal and opposite reaction”. The second recorded-demonstration of the action-reaction principle was in the first century B.C. Hero of Alexandria, a Greek mathematician 1 and scientist, constructed a device known as aeolipile.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Impact of Technical Expertise Author(S): Dorothy Nelkin Source: Social Studies of Science, Vol
    The Political Impact of Technical Expertise Author(s): Dorothy Nelkin Source: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Feb., 1975), pp. 35-54 Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/284554 . Accessed: 20/10/2014 20:36 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Studies of Science. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.173.127.127 on Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:36:22 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SocialStudies of Science, 5 (1975), 35-54 The PoliticalImpact of TechnicalExpertise Dorothy Nelkin Technologiesof speedand power - airports,power generating facilities, highways,dams - are oftena focus of bitteropposition. As these technologiesbecome increasinglycontroversial, scientists, whose expertiseforms the basis of technicaldecisions, find themselves involved in publicdisputes. This 'public'role of sciencehas generatedconcern bothwithin the profession and beyond;for a scientist'sinvolvement in controversialissues may violatethe normsof scientificresearch, but have considerableimpact on the politicalprocess. As scientistsare calledupon to addressa widerrange of controversial policy questions,l 'problemsof politicalchoice [may] becomeburied in debateamong expertsover highly technical alternatives'.2 This paperwill discusssome of the implicationsof the increasing involvementof scientistsin controversialareas.
    [Show full text]
  • L'expropriation De La Santé Ivan Illich
    NÉMÉSIS MÉDICALE L’EXPROPRIATION DE LA SANTÉ IVAN ILLICH il a trouvé ma faveur au désert, ce peuple des réchappés du glaive : va vers ton lieu de repos ! jér 312 LE DERNIER ÉVANGILE [NOVISSIMUM EVANGELIUM] Reproduction gratuite par l’association Les Cahiers Jérémie de l’œuvre d’Ivan Illich. Ce fichier ne peut donc faire l’objet d’aucune transaction commerciale. Novembre 2020. www.akklesia.eu Édition d’une réflexion akklésiastique. NÉMÉSIS MÉDICALE L’EXPROPRIATION DE LA SANTÉ IVAN ILLICH 1975 Avant-propos Dans cet essai, j’envisage l’entreprise médicale comme paradigme pour illustrer l’institution industrielle. La médicalisation pernicieuse de la san- té n’est qu’un aspect d’un phénomène généralisé : la paralysie de la produc- tion des valeurs d’usage par l’homme, comme conséquence de l’encombre- ment par des marchandises produites pour lui. L’évaluation de l’entreprise médicale est une tâche politique. Elle exige du non-médecin un effort de recherche personnelle hors de toute tutelle profes- sionnelle. Elle exige du médecin la redécouverte d’une « médecine générale ». L’ensemble des matériaux bibliographiques que j’ai rassemblés et mention- nés dans des notes en bas de pages reflète mon désir d’associer le lecteur à cette aventure. L’engagement dans la recherche d’une alternative concrète au système qui nous opprime présuppose l’ouverture à l’immense richesse des choix. La discussion prématurée de telle ou telle organisation nouvelle du système médical ne serait que pure diversion. J’ai élaboré la présente version française en janvier 1975 à Cuernava- ca avec l’assistance de Jean-Pierre Dupuy.
    [Show full text]
  • PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, and the V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ENGINEERING CONSENT: PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael Brian Petersen, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Jeffrey Herf Departmen t of History This dissertation is the story of the German scientists and engineers who developed, tested, and produced the V-2 missile, the world’s first liquid -fueled ballistic missile. It examines the social, political, and cultural roots of the prog ram in the Weimar Republic, the professional world of the Peenemünde missile base, and the results of the specialists’ decision to use concentration camp slave labor to produce the missile. Previous studies of this subject have been the domain of either of sensationalistic journalists or the unabashed admirers of the German missile pioneers. Only rarely have historians ventured into this area of inquiry, fruitfully examining the history of the German missile program from the top down while noting its admi nistrative battles and technical development. However, this work has been done at the expense of a detailed examination of the mid and lower -level employees who formed the backbone of the research and production effort. This work addresses that shortcomi ng by investigating the daily lives of these employees and the social, cultural, and political environment in which they existed. It focuses on the key questions of dedication, motivation, and criminality in the Nazi regime by asking “How did Nazi authori ties in charge of the missile program enlist the support of their employees in their effort?” “How did their work translate into political consent for the regime?” “How did these employees come to view slave labor as a viable option for completing their work?” This study is informed by traditions in European intellectual and social history while borrowing from different methods of sociology and anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 13 Mission Review
    APOLLO 13 MISSION REVIEW HEAR& BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS SECOR’D SESSION JUR’E 30, 1970 Printed for the use of the Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47476 0 WASHINGTON : 1970 COMMITTEE ON AEROKAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES CLINTON P. ANDERSON, New Mexico, Chairman RICHARD B. RUSSELL, Georgia MARGARET CHASE SMITH, Maine WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washington CARL T. CURTIS, Nebraska STUART SYMINGTON, bfissouri MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon JOHN STENNIS, Mississippi BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona STEPHEN M.YOUNG, Ohio WILLIAM B. SAXBE, Ohio THOJfAS J. DODD, Connecticut RALPH T. SMITH, Illinois HOWARD W. CANNON, Nevada SPESSARD L. HOLLAND, Florida J4MES J. GEHRIG,Stad Director EVERARDH. SMITH, Jr., Professional staffMember Dr. GLENP. WILSOS,Professional #tad Member CRAIGVOORHEES, Professional Staff Nember WILLIAMPARKER, Professional Staff Member SAMBOUCHARD, Assistant Chief Clerk DONALDH. BRESNAS,Research Assistant (11) CONTENTS Tuesday, June 30, 1970 : Page Opening statement by the chairman, Senator Clinton P. Anderson-__- 1 Review Board Findings, Determinations and Recommendations-----_ 2 Testimony of- Dr. Thomas 0. Paine, Administrator of NASA, accompanied by Edgar M. Cortright, Director, Langley Research Center and Chairman of the dpollo 13 Review Board ; Dr. Charles D. Har- rington, Chairman, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel ; Dr. Dale D. Myers, Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, and Dr. Rocco A. Petrone, hpollo Director -___________ 21, 30 Edgar 11. Cortright, Chairman, hpollo 13 Review Board-------- 21,27 Dr. Dale D. Mvers. Associate Administrator for Manned SDace 68 69 105 109 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIOSS 1. Internal coinponents of oxygen tank So. 2 ---_____-_________________ 22 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Health: the Urban Planner's Dilemma
    Leveraging Health: The Urban Planner’s Dilemma THESIS SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR IN PHILOSOPHY BY PETER FAWCETT APRIL 2019 DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND PLANNING SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. vii Part I Introduction and background .................................................................... 1 1. Human health: a “new” agenda for urban planning ................................. 2 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Health in the planning project ........................................................................ 6 1.2.1 The birth of modern urban planning ....................................................... 6 1.2.2 Integration and fragmentation .............................................................. 11 1.2.3 Shifting perspectives and healthy cities ................................................ 15 1.2.4 Cities at the crossroads ........................................................................ 19 1.3 Project details ............................................................................................. 24 1.3.1 Genesis of the research ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Advisory
    NEWS RELEASE Tuesday, May 22, 2007 Eight to be Inducted into Space Camp Hall of Fame HUNTSVILLE, AL -- The U.S. Space & Rocket Center proudly announces eight people, including famed rocket scientist Dr. Wernher von Braun and Dottie Metcalf- Lindenburger, one of America’s youngest astronauts, will be inducted into the Space Camp Hall of Fame on Wednesday, June 13th. The black tie optional event will take place in the Von Braun Center’s North Hall beginning at 7:00 p.m. Award winning actor William Shatner will emcee the event, with special guests former NASA astronauts Story Musgrave and Jim Halsell. Other members of the inaugural class of inductees include Edward O. Buckbee, Dr. Georg von Tiesenhausen, Dan Oates, Amanda Stubblefield, Dr. James Rice, and Penny Pettigrew. The Space Camp Hall of Fame was created to help celebrate the 25th anniversary of Space Camp and designed to honor graduates, former employees and supporters who have distinguished themselves in their respective careers or made considerable in-kind contributions in an effort to help further the goals of the Space Camp program. Current plans call for as many as ten to be inducted annually. Von Braun will be the first. When the names are called and the nominees introduced, Dr. Wernher von Braun will be the first. Best known for his leading role in the development of America’s manned space flight program, von Braun also conceived the idea for Space Camp. In 1977, while touring the Space & Rocket Center, he shared, with former CEO Ed Buckbee, his vision of an educational camp program for children designed to help prepare the next generation of engineers, mathematicians and scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Spies and Shuttles
    Spies and Shuttles University Press of Florida Florida A&M University, Tallahassee Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers Florida International University, Miami Florida State University, Tallahassee New College of Florida, Sarasota University of Central Florida, Orlando University of Florida, Gainesville University of North Florida, Jacksonville University of South Florida, Tampa University of West Florida, Pensacola SPIE S AND SHUTTLE S NASA’s Secret Relationships with the DoD and CIA James E. David Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, Washington, D.C., in association with University Press of Florida Gainesville · Tallahassee · Tampa · Boca Raton Pensacola · Orlando · Miami · Jacksonville · Ft. Myers · Sarasota Copyright 2015 by Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper All photographs courtesy of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. This book may be available in an electronic edition. 20 19 18 17 16 15 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data David, James E., 1951– author. Spies and shuttles : NASA’s secret relationships with the DOD and CIA / James David. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8130-4999-1 (cloth) ISBN 978-0-8130-5500-8 (ebook) 1. Astronautics—United States —History. 2. Astronautics, Military—Government policy—United States. 3. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration—History. 4. United States. Department of Defense—History.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Space Flight Center
    ............__........ Marshall Space Flight Center Introduction This booklet, prepared by the Marshall Space Flight Center, is illustrative of the Center's support for the von Braun Celebration of the Arts and Sciences (VBCAS). Marshall is honored to be a participant in the celebration of this 50-year cultural and technological legacy of Dr. Wernher von Braun and the members of his famed German rocket team. The VBCAS features a year-long series of events, performances, exhibits and historical, cultural and educational programs. Special performances by internationally known artists and speakers, and commemorative events featuring an aerospace, German, or nostalgic theme will be held during this year-long celebration. More than 30 arts, technology, educational and community organizations have been working for almost three years to plan this series of events. In 1950, Dr. von Braun and approximately 100 of his team members came to Huntsville, Alabama, to begin work on what would later become America's historic space program. Dr. von Braun eventually served as the first director of the Marshall Center and led the development of the Saturn V launch vehicle that lofted three American astronauts on their journey to the moon in July 1969. music. In the 1920s, von Braun was accepted for led the piano lessons by the great composer Paul design for the most powerful rocket the world has Hindemith and had even composed some pieces of ever known and used it to launch the first humans his own by the age of 15. Von Braun also took cello to the surface of the moon in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Earth Satellites Designed and Fabricated by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
    SDO-1600 lCL 7 (Revised) tQ SARTIFICIAL EARTH SATELLITES DESIGNED AND FABRICATED 9 by I THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY I __CD C-:) PREPARED i LJJby THE SPACE DEPARTMENT -ow w - THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY 0 APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, Maryland 20810 Operating under Contract N00024 78-C-5384 with the Department of the Navv Approved for public release; distributiort uni mited. 7 9 0 3 2 2, 0 74 Unclassified PLEASE FOLD BACK IF NOT NEEDED : FOR BIBLIOGRAPHIC PURPOSES SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE ER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER 4._ TITLE (and, TYR- ,E, . COVERED / Artificial Earth Satellites Designed and Fabricated / Status Xept* L959 to date by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. U*. t APL/JHU SDO-1600 7. AUTHOR(s) 8. CONTRACTOR GRANT NUMBER($) Space Department N00024-=78-C-5384 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME & ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT. TASK AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Task Y22 Johns Hopkins Road Laurel, Maryland 20810 11.CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME & ADDRESS 12.R Naval Plant Representative Office Julp 078 Johns Hopkins Road 13. NUMBER OF PAGES MyLaurel,rland 20810 235 14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS , -. 15. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report) Naval Plant Representative Office j Unclassified - Johns Hopkins Road f" . Laurel, Maryland 20810 r ' 15a. SCHEDULEDECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING 16 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of th,s Report) Approved for public release; distribution N/A unlimited 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstrat entered in Block 20. of tifferent from Report) N/A 18.
    [Show full text]