DOCSLIB.ORG

Kleverud-Sørli-Åkersvika

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Dovre Line: Kleverud-Sørli-Åkersvika Stine Ilebrekke Undrum Project Director Bane NOR Tender Conference June 5. 2019 Important HSE principles for Bane NOR • Safety always has first priority • Our safety culture shall ensure that we work systematically with safety to avoid human injury and environmental or material damages. − we adhere to the highest safety standards. − we understand and consider risk. − we have zero tolerance for breach of safety regulations • The Working Environment Act applies to EVERYONE working in Norway, both Norwegian and foreign nationals. − http://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/working-conditions-in- norway.html Everybody safely home 4 Infrastructure Construction Division Infrastrucure Construction Einar Kilde Project 2020 Plan & Portfolio Brede Nermoen Elsebeth A Bakke Finance & Communication projectcontrol Cecilie Melland Birger Steffensen Contract & Market Safety & Quality Henning Scheel Vigdis Bjørlo Technique & Concept HR Trude Anke Gry Jødestøl Folloline Ringerikeline/ E16 East (Østfoldline & West/Mid Vestfoldline New Oslo-tunnel Per David Morten Dovreline) Hans-Egil Larsen Lars A Tangerås Anne Siri Haugen Borenstein Klokkersveen Stine I Undrum 5 East – Østfold Line & Dovre Line Project director Stine Ilebrekke Undrum Dep. Projectcontrol Project director Tor-A Holst Larsen Per B Vilnes Communication HR TBN Arild Sæthre Contract & Safety & Quality strategy Bente Gamst Karin Kaasen Hornnæs Venjar – Langset Kleverud – Sørli – Planprojects Sandbukta – Moss Planprojects Rønnaug-Ingeborg Åkersvika Dovreline – Såstad Østfoldline Resset Geir H Kvillum Lars Eide Jarle Rasmussen Elisabeth Nordli 6 Construction Projects Dovre Line 7 1:23 (2:14) InterCity-projects Oslo-Lillehammer on Dovre Line 0:55 (1:23) Oslo-Hamar • Venjar-Langset 2023 • Kleverud-Sørli 2026 0:37 (1:23) • Sørli-Åkersvika 2026 Oslo-Hamar • Brumunddal-Moelv 2030 • Hamar-Brumunddal 2032 • Moelv-Lillehammer 2034 1:00 (1:28) Oslo-Tønsberg 1:30 (2:45) 0:45 (1:08) 1:08 (1:45) Oslo-Porsgrunn Oslo-Fredrikstad Oslo-Halden 8 Project status • Kleverud- Sørli • Sørli -Åkersvika − Preparatory work ongoing − Zoning plan expected to be approved late 2019 − Preparation of invitation to tenders − Start pre-qualifications of contracts late 2020 − Start pre-qualification of two first main − Contract award remaining contract 2021/2022 contracts autumn 2019 − Contract award first Main Contract late 2020 Tangen Railway Station Hestnes Tunnel Sørli Timber Stange Åkersvika (3 km) Terminal Railway Station Wetland Area Tangenvika Bridge (1 km) 9 Lillehammer Project summary Moelv Brumunddal • Facts and numbers Hamar Converter Jessnes Hamar − 30 km new double track railway from Kleverud to Åkersvika Sørli-Åkersvika Stange − The Hestnes Tunnel 3,1 km Sørli Tangen − Tangenvika Railway Bridge 1,07 km Kleverud-Sørli − Construction of a new railway station at Tangen Kleverud − Rebuild of existing railway station at Stange − Åkersvika Wetland Langset − 21 other large constructions Eidsvoll − Tracks and catenary. Railway technique Venjar − Designed for a max speed of 250 km/h Oslo Airport • Planned government funding − Kleverud-Sørli 2020 including Hamar Converter station Lillestrøm − Sørli-Åkersvika 2021 Oslo S 10 Kleverud – Sørli - Åkersvika Geir Kvillum Head of Project Bane NOR Tender Conference June 5. 2019 1:23 (2:14) InterCity-projects Oslo-Lillehammer on Dovre Line 0:55 (1:23) Oslo-Hamar • Venjar-Langset 2023 • Kleverud-Sørli 2026 0:37 (1:23) • Sørli-Åkersvika 2026 Oslo-Hamar • Brumunddal-Moelv 2030 • Hamar-Brumunddal 2032 • Moelv-Lillehammer 2034 1:00 (1:28) Oslo-Tønsberg 1:30 (2:45) 0:45 (1:08) 1:08 (1:45) Oslo-Porsgrunn Oslo-Fredrikstad Oslo-Halden 12 Contract structure 15 Procurement plan 16 KS-1 The Hestnes tunnel 17 Contract KS-1 The Hestnes tunnel Preparatory works at KS-1 KS-2 KSÅ-3 SÅ-4 Hamar Kleverud Tangen Sørli Stange Åkersvika Hamar Espa From Kleverud to Espa 1200 m open landscape 3100 m rock tunnel no. of large constructions: 3 18 Contract KS-1 The Hestnes tunnel • Civil work - EPC contract • Contract basis: Norwegian total contract 2015 (NTK 15) • Procurement procedure: Negotiated procedure (konkurranse med forhandling) • Number of pre-qualified tenderers should preferably be between 3-5 • Planned schedule − Start prequalification Q4 (December) 2019 − Contract award Q4 (December) 2020 19 KS-1 Civil works • Handling of excavated rock: • 4 technical buildings − 130 000 m3 fillings in lake Mjøsa • 2 access tunnels, total length 850m − Surplus of rock being transported to Sørli • Bridge over stream Labbelva 20 KS-1 Hestnes tunnel • Drill & blast • 3,1 km single tube tunnel, cross- section area 125m2 • Excavation volume, 420 000 sm3 − Hard rock, mainly granitic gneiss and amphibolite • Water & frost-protection; membrane and concrete lining 21 KS-2 Tangenvika railway bridge 22 Contract KS-2 Tangenvika railway bridge Preparatory works at KS-1 KS-2 KSÅ-3 SÅ-4 Hamar Kleverud Tangen Sørli Stange Åkersvika Hamar Espa From Espa to Furnesbakken 1800 m open landscape 1070 m bridge no. of large constructions: 2 23 Contract KS-2 Tangenvika railway bridge • Civil work - EPC contract • Contract basis: Norwegian total contract 2015 (NTK 15) • Procurement procedure: Competitive dialogue (Konkurransepreget dialog) − With the aim to: ‒ Focus and align project needs and goals in an early phase ‒ Make use of competence and technology in the market / Exploit innovative ideas and solutions ‒ Empower efficient project execution through common understanding of technical solutions and allocation of risk • Number of pre-qualified tenderers should preferably be between 3-5 • Planned schedule − Start prequalification Q4 (October) 2019 − Contract award Q4 (December) 2020 24 KS-2 Tangenvika railway bridge • Tangenvika railway bridge • Restructuring of local road • Civil work in open landscape • Rock cut approx. 250 000 sm3 • Fillings for abutment and embankments • Temporary quay facilities at northern side of Tangenvika bay • Wildlife crossing 25 KS-2 Tangenvika Railway bridge • Concrete bridge • Water depth of up to 50 m with 40 m layer of soils/subsoils above bedrock • Challenging foundation due to location and depths • Focus on increased degree of freedom in span-widths and piling method 26 KSÅ-3 Open landscape, incl. 2 stations 27 Contract KSÅ-3 Open landscape, incl. 2 stations Preparatory works at KS-1 KS-2 KSÅ-3 SÅ-4 Hamar Kleverud Tangen Sørli Stange Åkersvika Hamar Espa From Furnesbakken to Stange including Stange station 13 250 m open landscape 2 stations no. of large constructions: 7 28 Contract KSÅ-3 Open landscape, incl. 2 stations • Civil work - EPC contract • Contract basis: Norwegian total contract 2015 (NTK 15) • Procurement procedure: Negotiated procedure (Konkurranse med forhandling) • Number of pre-qualified tenderers should preferably be between 3-5 • Planned schedule − Start prequalification Q4 2020 − Contract award Q4 2021 29 KSÅ-3 • 13,3 km substructure including civil works at two stations, Tangen and Stange • Excavation and handling of approx. 1 500 000 sm3 rock and soils − Large capacity landfills close to site • “Greenfield” areas to Sørli • Close to existing railway from Sørli timber- terminal • Wildlife crossings 30 KSÅ-3 Tangen station • New 4-track Tangen station, 2 tracks to platform. • Parking areas 31 KSÅ-3 Stange station • New 3- track station situated at the same place as existing Stange station • Stange station shall be at full operation during construction. • Parking, bus and taxi areas 32 SÅ-4 Open landscape 33 Contract SÅ-4 Open landscape Preparatory works at KS-1 KS-2 KSÅ-3 SÅ-4 Hamar Kleverud Tangen Sørli Stange Åkersvika Hamar Espa From Stange to Åkersvika 9000 m open landscape no. of large constructions: 9 34 Contract SÅ-4 Open landscape • Civil work - EPC contract • Contract basis: Norwegian total contract 2015 (NTK 15) • Procurement procedure: Negotiated procedure (konkurranse med forhandling) • Number of pre-qualified tenderers should preferably be between 3-5 • Planned schedule − Start prequalification Q4 2020 − Contract award Q4 2021 35 SÅ-4 • 9 km civil works in open landscape • Excavation and handling of: − approx. 680 000 sm3 rock and soils − 72 000 sm3 of alum shale • Large landfill at Nesten/Skjerden • Approved landfill for disposal of alum shale close to site • 2 large culvert/ concrete tunnels • Restructuring of roads 36 SÅ-4 • Two large culverts/concrete tunnels • Deep cuttings in agricultural landscape 37 SÅ-4 Åkersvika and construction work • Permanent filling above existing track in Åkersvika – Ramsar area • New operational phase with temporary fillings • Restrictions in construction work during the breeding period for birds (April-May) • Permission from county governor granted before construction starts 38 Kleverud – Sørli - Åkersvika Niklas Marcussen Engineering manager Bane NOR Tender Conference June 5. 2019 KSÅ-6 & KSÅ-7 – Railway technique 40 Contract KSÅ-6 and KSÅ-7 Railway technique Preparatory works at KS-1 KS-2 KSÅ-3 SÅ-4 Hamar Kleverud Tangen Sørli Stange Åkersvika Hamar Espa KSÅ-6 Tracks and OCL KSÅ-7 Power supply and Telecom From Kleverud to Åkersvika 30 000 m railway no. of technical buildings: 19 41 Contract KSÅ-6/ KSÅ-7 Railway technique • Railway technique - Construction contract • Engineering – Integrated team with Bane NOR employees and consulting engineers • Contract basis construction contract: NS 8405 • Procurement procedure: Negotiated procedure • Number of pre-qualified tenderers should preferably be between 3-5 • Planned schedule Construction contract − Start prequalification Q3 or Q4 2021 − Contract
Recommended publications
  • Measuring the Inaccurate: Causes and Consequences of Train Delays

    Measuring the Inaccurate: Causes and Consequences of Train Delays

    Summary: Measuring the inaccurate: Causes and consequences of train delays TØI Report 1459/2015 Author(s): Askill Harkjerr Halse, Vegard Østli and Marit Killi Oslo 2015, 71 pages Norwegian language In this report, we argue that the rich available data on train performance and railway infrastructure should be used to get precise measurements of economic relationships in railway management. As one such exercise, we first show how temporary speed reductions on railway links caused by low infrastructure quality affects running time and delays for Norwegian freight trains. Even though each speed reduction only adds about 44-50 seconds to running time, speed reductions still contribute to delay at the destination. Secondly, we show that delays has a negative effect on demand for passenger and freight trains services. The corresponding demand elasticity is lower than the one implied by willingness-to-pay studies, consistent with evidence from Great Britain. In is widely acknowledged in the transportation economics literature that more reliable transport time constitutes an economic benefit. In the presence of unreliability, individuals and firms adjust by taking costly measures like departing early or keeping a safety stock of goods. The ‘cost’ of train delays is therefore the foregone benefits that could have been achieved if all trains were running on time. Much of the existing literature on railway punctuality is based on optimization and/or simulation, calling for more empirical studies. In the innovation project PRESIS, funded by the Research Council of Norway and the Norwegian National Rail Administration, we have developed methods to survey reliability in the Norwegian rail sector.
  • Congestion Relief Toll Tunnels

    Congestion Relief Toll Tunnels

    Policy Study No. 164 July 1993 CONGESTION RELIEF TOLL TUNNELS by Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Yuzo Sugimoto EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Changing urban land-use patterns have reduced the importance of traditional downtowns as the origin and destination of numerous vehicular trips. Much traffic on downtown-area freeways seeks merely to get past downtown, thereby worsening the level of congestion for those seeking access to downtown. A number of European cities have begun to develop a new type of transportation facility: congestion-relief toll tunnels in downtown areas. These projects appear to be economically feasible largely or entirely from premium-price tolls paid by users. Hence, they are being developed by private consortia, operating under long-term franchises from government. Other keys to the feasibility of such projects are peak/off-peak pricing structures (congestion pricing), nonstop electronic toll collection, and restriction of use to auto-size vehicles only (to reduce tunnel dimensions and therefore capital investment). Preliminary analysis indicates that congestion-relief bypass tunnels for downtown Los Angeles and San Francisco would be economically feasible as private business ventures, if developed along European lines. Similar approaches might be applied to other controversial freeway projects in both cities, and to restructuring Boston's huge and controversial Central Artery/Tunnel project. Congress has already authorized public-private partnerships of this type, permitting private capital and private owner/operation to be used, both for new projects and to rebuild existing highway, bridge, and tunnel facilities. Six states and Puerto Rico have enacted private-tollway legislation under which such projects could be developed and operated.
  • Flytogets Årsrapport 2009 INNLEDNING

    Flytogets Årsrapport 2009 INNLEDNING

    Flytogets årsrapport 2009 INNLEDNING Når alt er på sitt beste, kan man bli enda bedre. Det er Flytogets filosofi. I tillegg har vi gjennomført to store operasjoner som ytterligere vil tilføre De siste årene kan vi vise til gode resultater og målinger både økonomisk verdi til Flytoget i årene som kommer. Vi kjører nå til og fra Drammen. For og omdømmemessig. å øke kapasitet og komfort har vi lagt til enda en vogn til togene våre. Vi økte vår markedsandel på reiser til og fra Oslo Lufthavn, til tross for at OSL Tradisjonen tro scorer vi fortsatt blandt de beste i Norge på tilfredshet blant opplevde merkbar reduksjon i sin trafikk. Billettløse reiser har vært, og er, et ansatte. Dette er vi stolte av. Fokuset på medarbeiderskap mener vi er viktig fokuspunkt for å etterstrebe effektivitet og punktlighet. I år var 50 % nøkkelen til forbedring år etter år. av alle reiser billettløse, noe som var vår målsetting da året startet. Men så ser jo Flytoget lys i tunellen oftere enn de fleste andre, da. 23 2009 2008 NØKKELTALL/KEYFIGURES Alle tall i mill NOK Driftsinntekter/Operating income 724 719 Driftskostnader/Operating costs 575 520 Driftsresultat/Operating revenues 149 199 Netto finans/Net financial cost -1 -4 Ekstraordinære kostnader/Extraordinary costs 0 0 Årets resultat/Annual results (MNOK) 148 195 INNHOLD Balanse/Balance Immaterielle eiendeler/Immaterial assets 275 289 Nøkkeltall s. 05 Administrerende direktør s. 06 Anleggsmidler/Fixed assets 1 083 914 Styrets beretning s. 09 Kontanter/Current assets 81 168 Presentasjon av styret s. 14 Fordringer/Receivables 49 15 Regnskapsprinsipper s.
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure

    Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure

    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
  • Punktlighetsrapport 2007

    Punktlighetsrapport 2007

    Punktlighetsrapport / Punctuality Report 2007 1 Innhold / Contens Forord / Introduction 3 Punktlighet / Punctuality 4 Persontrafikken / Passenger services 6 Lokaltog / Suburban 6 Flytoget / Gardermoen 10 Mellomdistanse / Regional 10 Strekningsvis punktlighet / Punctuality by line 12 Persontrafikk langdistanse / Long-distance passenger 12 Utlandstog / Cross-border 13 Godstrafikk / Freight 14 Punktlighet i togtrafikken / Train punctuality 1999–2007 16 Forsinkelsestimer / Hours lost to delays 2007 17 Forsinkelsesårsaker totalt / Overall causes of delays 17 Sporkapasitet / Track capacity 18 Flaskehalser / Bottlenecks 18 Kapasitetsforbedringer 2007 / Capacity enhancements in 2007 20 Eksempler på beregnet tidstap ved saktekjøringer / Examples on time lost owing to speed restrictions 21 Krav til oppetid / Uptime requirements 22 Trafikkutvikling / Traffic changes 25 Persontrafikken / Passenger services 25 Godstrafikken / Freight 26 2 Forord / Introduction Jernbaneverkets andel av forsinkelser i togtrafikken, inklu- Jernbaneverket’s rate of train delays and cancellations is sive innstillinger (kanselleringer) defineres som ”oppetid”. described as the infrastructure’s “uptime”. To meet the target For å tilfredsstille behovet for oppetid mht punktlighet, for uptime in punctuality terms, which should be close to som bør være nær 100 %, er det stilt krav til de forhold som 100%, we apply requirements in respect of the following påvirker dette; contributory factors: – tidstap på grunn av saktekjøringer. – Time lost owing to speed restrictions – forsinkelsestimer og innstillinger av tog som skyldes – Delays and service cancellations owing to infrastructure forhold i infrastrukturen. conditions – høy tilgjengelighet og lav feilfrekvens i anleggene til – High levels of availability and low failure rates in Jernbane- Jernbaneverkets. verket’s infrastructure Dette er viktige bidrag til god punktlighet og regularitet. These factors play a major part in good timekeeping and service reliability.
  • Annual Report 2004

    Annual Report 2004

    Annual Report 2004 1 Contents Time for trains 3 What is Jernbaneverket? 4 Organisational structure 5 Safety 6 Finance and efficiency 10 Operations 10 Maintenance 11 Capital expenditure – rail network development 12 State Accounts for 2004 14 Human resources 16 Personnel and working environment 16 JBV Ressurs 16 Competitiveness 18 Train companies operating on the national rail network 18 Infrastructure capacity – Jernbaneverket’s core product 18 Operating parameters 19 Key figures for the national rail network 21 Traffic volumes on the national rail network 23 Punctuality 24 Environmental protection 26 International activities 28 Contact details 30 www.jernbaneverket.no 2 Cover: Jernbaneverket’s celebrations to mark 150 years of Norwegian railways. Photo: Øystein Grue Time for trains The past year marked the 150th anniversary of the railways in Norway and proved a worthy celebration. Punctuality has never been better, rail traffic is growing, and in summer 2004 the Norwegian Parliament took the historic decision to invest NOK 26.4 billion in developing a competitive rail network over the ten years from 2006 to 2015. In other words, the anniversary year not only provided the opportunity for a nostalgic look back, but also confirmed that the railways will continue to play a central role in the years ahead. In line with Parliament’s decision, value our good working relationship with autumn 2005. This brings us one step clo- Jernbaneverket has drawn up an action the trade unions. The railway has a culture ser to our goal of an efficient, modern rail programme which, if implemented, will and a historic legacy which need to be network in the Oslo region.
  • Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an Area with Increased Risk

    Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an Area with Increased Risk

    REPORT Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an area with increased risk February 2014 Published by: Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) 2015 ISBN: 978-82-7768-350-8 (PDF) Graphic production: Erik Tanche Nilssen AS, Skien Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an area with increased risk February 2014 CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 01 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Mandat .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Questions and scope ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Organisation of the project ................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.4
  • Jernbaneverket

    Jernbaneverket

    On track in 2008 A brief look at the activities of Jernbaneverket Director General Elisabeth Enger is preparing for record railway investments and recruiting more and more young people to Jernbaneverket, the Norwegian National Rail Administration ALL ABoard! 155 years of Norwegian Contents railway history All aboard! 155 years of Norwegian railway history 2 1854 Norway’s first railway line opens, linking Kristiania As Jernbaneverket’s new Director General, I see a high level of commitment to Key figures 2 (now Oslo) with Eidsvoll. the railways – both among our employees and others. Many people would like 1890-1910 Railway lines totalling 1 419 km are built in Norway. All aboard! 3 to see increased investment in the railway, which is why the strong political will 1909 The Bergen line is completed at a cost equivalent to This is Jernbaneverket 4 the entire national budget. to achieve a more robust railway system is both gratifying and inspirational. 2008 in brief 6 1938 The Sørland line to Kristiansand opens. Increased demand for both passenger and freight transport is extremely positive Working for Jernbaneverket 8 1940-1945 The German occupation forces take control of NSB, because it is happening despite the fact that we have been unable to offer our Norwegian State Railways. Restrictions on fuel Construction 14 loyal customers the product they deserve. Higher funding levels are now providing consumption give the railway a near-monopoly on Secure wireless communication 18 transport. The railway network is extended by grounds for new optimism and – slowly but surely – we will improve quality, cut Think green – think train 20 450 km using prisoners of war as forced labour.
  • Hydrogen and Batteries for Propulsion of Freight Trains in Norway

    Hydrogen and Batteries for Propulsion of Freight Trains in Norway

    Hydrogen and Baeries for Propulsion of Freight Trains in Norway Federico Zenith Steffen Møller-Holst Magnus Thomassen Birmingham, July 4–5, 2016 Outline Non-Electrified Railways in Norway Alternaves for Electrificaon Techno-Economical Analysis 1 Outline Non-Electrified Railways in Norway Alternaves for Electrificaon Techno-Economical Analysis 2 Norwegian Railway Network Focus on non-electrified lines (in red) • Røros and Solør lines (381 km, 94 km) – Catenary officially proposed – “Backup” for Dovre line • Rauma line (111 km) – Scenic line for tourists – Catenary not desirable • Nordland line, 731 km – To be partly electrified (130 km) – Up to 19 ‰ slope • Policians: “Please electrify everything” • Railway authority asked SINTEF 3 Freight on Nordland line Alternaves for Railway Electrificaon in Norway As considered in SINTEF’s study • Alternaves considered: – Biofuels – Natural gas – Hydrogen – Baeries – Diesel – Catenary – Hybrids • Evaluaon criteria – Environment – Technology readiness – Regulatory framework – Economy – Flexibility & robustness 4 Alternaves for Railway Electrificaon in Norway As considered in SINTEF’s study • Alternaves considered: – Biofuels – Natural gas – Hydrogen – Baeries – Diesel – Catenary – Hybrids • Evaluaon criteria – Environment – Technology readiness – Regulatory framework – Economy – Flexibility & robustness Freight on Nordland line 4 • Crosses polar circle • Strong winds (few or no trees) • Ice formaon on infrastructure 10-hour cab rides on Youtube (“Nordlandsbanen minu for minu”) The Nordland Line • Single-track
  • 14 09 21 Nordics Gids 200Dpi BA ML

    14 09 21 Nordics Gids 200Dpi BA ML

    1 Impressies Oslo Vigelandpark Architecten aan het werk bij Snohetta Skyline in stadsdeel Bjørvika Stadhuis Oeragebouw (Snohetta) Noors architectuurcentrum Gyldendal Norsk Forlag (Sverre Fehn) Vliegveld Gardemoen (N.Torp) Mortensrud kirke (Jensen Skodvin) Ligging aan de Oslo Fjord Vikingschip Museum Nationaal museum 2 Impressies Stockholm Husbyparken Bonniers Konsthalle Royal Seaport Bibliotheek Strandparken Medelhavsmuseet HAmmersby sjostad Riksbanken Markus Kyrkan Arstabridge Terminal building Vasaparken 3 Inhoudsopgave Inhoudsopgave Programma 5 Contactgegevens 7 Deelnemerslijst 8 Plattegronden Oslo 9 Plattegronden Stockholm 11 Introductie Oslo 13 Noorse architectuur 15 Projecten Oslo 21 Introductie Stockholm 48 Projecten Stockholm 51 4 Programma Oslo OSLO, vrijdag 12 september 2014 6:55 KLM vlucht AMS-OSL 9:46 transfer met reguliere trein van vliegveld naar CS (nabij hotel) 10:10 bagage drop Clarion Royal Christiania Hotel, Biskop Gunnerus' gate 3, Oslo 10:35 reistijd metro T 1 Frognerseteren van Jernbanetorget T (Oslo S) naar halte Holmenkollen T 11:10 Holmenkollen ski jump, Kongeveien 5, 0787 Oslo 12:00 reistijd metro T 1 Helsfyr van Holmenkollen T naar halte Majoerstuen T 12:40 Vigelandpark, Nobels gate 32, Oslo 14:00 reistijd metro T 3 Mortensrud van Majorstuen T naar halte Mortensrud T 14:35 Mortensrud church, Mortensrud menighet, Helga Vaneks Vei 15, 1281 Oslo 15:20 reistijd metro 3 Sinsen van Mortensrud naar halte T Gronland 16:00 Norwegian Centre for Design and Architecture, DogA, Hausmanns gate 16, 0182 Oslo lopen naar hotel
  • Relocation of Trondheim's Port

    Relocation of Trondheim's Port

    Relocation of Trondheim's port Manuel Cienfuegos Delgado Coastal and Marine Civil Engineering Submission date: June 2014 Supervisor: Tore Øivin Sager, BAT Co-supervisor: Edward McCormack, BAT Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Civil and Transport Engineering Relocation of Trondheim's port Manuel Cienfuegos Delgado June 24, 2014 Dedicado a mi familia I II Preface This master thesis is the product of work carried out during the spring semester 2014 from January to June and represents the last element of my Civil Engineering degree; concluding my Civil and Transport Engineering studies period at the Nor- wegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). The thesis was performed at the Department of civil and Transport Engineering. In the first place, I would like to thank my supervisor, associate professor Ed- ward McCormack for his support, excellent guidance and valuable comments as I developed and finished my ideas throughout the work period in my thesis resarch; Additionally I would like to thanks proffesor Trude Tørset for the time spent teach- ing me how to use the software, and to Christian Steinsland, of "tansportøkonomisk institutt", for providing me the data needed. Finally, this thesis could not be carried out without the special support of my family, specially my parents, Francisco Javier Cienfuegos and Marina Delgado, who have been absolutely essential, not only to finish this thesis, but also to get up here, without their continued support I would never have done it. Additionally, thanks to a very important person, Laura Chico, always encouraging me in my worst moments and rejoicing in my bests.
  • Norwegian Travel Workshop 2012 Norwegian Travel Workshop 2019

    Norwegian Travel Workshop 2012 Norwegian Travel Workshop 2019

    1 PRE-/POST- TOURS Norwegian Travel Workshop 2012 Norwegian Travel Workshop 2019 View of Ålesund from Aksla. Photo: Arnfinn Tønnesen / VisitÅlesund 2 3 PRICES PRE AND POST TOURS 2019 INDEX NOTE! TOUR NAME/DESTINATION PAGE Participation on pre- and post-tours for NTW 2019 is free of charge apart from costs for domestic flights as specified under each tour. Cancellation of tour after 1st March 2019 will be charged with a fee equal to Pre-tour A Southern comfort - nature and culture in southernmost Norway 4 these costs. If there is no flight cost, the cancellation fee will be NOK 1.000,-. (Sørlandet & Telemark - Munch & Ibsen) Domestic flights will mainly be booked by Innovation Norway. See information under each tour re. which Pre-tour B In Ibsen’s footsteps (Oslo-Gudbrandsdalen-Geiranger) 8 flights will be booked by us and which must be arranged by each participant. Pre-tour C The railway route - a journey through Norwegian culture 12 Participants who wish to use alternative flights must book and pay them on their own. They must also ensure that (Gudbrandsdalen-Dovre-Romsdalen & Munch) departure and arrival times fit with the tour programme. In addition they must inform us, so that we may cancel flights/legs accordingly. Pre-tour D Fjord Norway - off the beaten track (Bergen-Fjordkysten-Loen) 16 Cost for legs cancelled will only be reimbursed if cancellation involves all flights connected with the tour. Pre-tour E Local food tour with World Champions 20 (Molde-Torjulvågen-Averøy-Ålesund) Please reckon with approx. 1,5 hrs for check-in/transfer in Oslo.