AHDI`S GÜLŞEN-Î ŞUARÂ: an Unusual Example of Biographical Dictionary of Poets
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A History of Ottoman Poetry
; All round a thousand nightingales and many an hundred lay. ' Come, let us turn us to the Court of Allah: Still may wax The glory of the Empire of the King triumphant aye, 2 So long as Time doth for the radiant sun-taper at dawn A silver candle-stick upon th' horizon edge display, ^ Safe from the blast of doom may still the sheltering skirt of Him Who holds the world protect the taper of thy life, we pray. Glory the comrade, Fortune, the cup-bearer at thy feast; * The beaker-sphere, the goblet steel-enwrought, of gold inlay ! I give next a translation of the famous Elegy on Sultan Suleyman. It is, as usual, in the terkib-bend form. There is one other stanza, the last of all, which I have not given. It is a panegyric on Suleyman's son and successor Selim II, such as it was incumbent on Baqi, in his capacity of court poet, to introduce into a poem intended for the sovereign but it strikes a false note, and is out of harmony with, and altogether unworthy of, the rest of the poem. The first stanza is addressed to the reader. Elegy on Sultan Sulcym;in. [214] thou, fool-tangled in the incsli of fame and glory's snare! How long this lusl of things of 'I'linc lliat ceaseless lluwolli o'er? Hold tliou in mitiil thai day vvliicli shall be hist of life's fair spring, When Mii:<ls the I uli|)-tinlcd cheek to auluniu-lcaf must wear, » Wiieii lliy lasl (Iwclling-placc must Ije, e'en like tlie dregs', tlic diisl, « When mi<l ihe iiowl of cheer must fail the stone I'injc's haml doth licar. -
A History of Ottoman Poetry
n J '^nvDjo'^ ^^^ojnvDjo'*^ ^j^hdkvsoi'^ "^/saaAwnatfv^^ ^mmts/j^ ^losANCEi^o. ^5MEUNIVER% ^•UBRARYO^ ^ ^OF'CAUFOff^ ^OFCAllFOft^ ... ^ %umm^ "^aAINMVft^ >&Aavaan-^^ ^lUBRARYQ^, ^mtmOA ^^WEIINIVER% ^10SANCEI% ^^ioJiiwio'^ <J?130NVS(n^ %a3MNrt]ttV^ ^OFCAUFOR^ ^OF-CAUF0«^ ,5S\EUNIVERS/A ^lOSANCEUr^ o ^AHvaan-^ '^^^uonvsoi'^ %a3AiNn]WV^ «^^EUNIVERS5j^ ^IDSANCEl^^ ^lUBRARYQ^ -i^lUBRARYQc. o ^smmm^ "^/smmid ^OJIIVDJO'^ ^mmns/^ ^IDSANCEUr^ ^OFCAUFOff^ ^OFCAIIFOR^ o ^^JlJDNVSm'v? '^^Aavaaiv^'^ "^(^Aavaani^ -^lUBRARYQ^^ -jAl-UBRARY^^, . \WE UNIVERi/A. a>;10SANCEI% ijuivi Ijuivi ii^l tort ^^OilTVDJO'^ ^i^ONVSOl^ "^MAINftiftV^ ^OFCAUFORjj^ «^5ji«llNIVER% ^IDSANCHft^ as ^^AHVaan# ^iJUDNVSOl'^ "^/JiBAINIl-^WV^ ^10SANCEI% ^5MEIINIVER% ^i^UONVSOV^ ^OFCAUFOff^ ^OFCAUFOI?^ %a3AiN(i3Wv ^(?Aavaan-i^ ^Aavaan#' %a3AI -^lUBRARYQc aweuniver% ^lUBRARYQ^ ^lUBR ^tfoJnvDjo'^ '^J^33NVS01'^ "^/saHMNn-iVkV ;OFCAUF0«5«j ^OFCAUF(%, ^OFCA . ^r ^ ^<?Aava8n# clOSANCElCr^ ^•UBRARYO^ ^lUBRARYQr, .5MEUNIV!R% avIOSA i IS ''/sajAiNaiiw ^lOSANCflfjr OFCAllFOff^ OFCAlirORi^, mx^1 ^^/imJNIlii^'^'' -^C^AUVJlllll i^"^"^ iK\'Mn'^ ^•UBRARYOc^ .^ irl^g\ iu I It Hiod hath Treasuries aneath the 'Ihronc, the Keys whereof are tlie Tongues of the Poets.' - • H a d f s i S li e r 1 f. EXninUOTHECA FRANC. BAB[NCL'R HISTORY OF OTTOMAN POETRY BY THE LATE E. J. W. GIBB, M. R. A.S. VOLUME III EDITED r.V EDWARD G. likOWXl-:, M. A., M. B., SIK THOMAS ADAMs' I'ltOI'KSSOK OK AKAIIIC ANI> I'KI.l.i >W OK I'KMUKOKK «;oi,i.k,(;k in iiik iinivkkski'V ok camhkiock; kki.i.ow ml iiik iikitisii acadkmv. EX BinLIOTHECA FRANC. BABINGER I , O N D (^ N LUZAC & CO.. C.Rl'.A'r RUSSl-.I.l. SlRl-l' T ";"4 PRINTED BY E. J. BRILL. LEYDEN. -
Among the the Name of Many Poems
lOI Hymns, wlion addressed to God, are called Munajat; when addressed to the Prophet, they are styled Na*^t. There are usually some of each class among the collected works of a poet. The Mesnevis alone have individual titles. In the case of romances these are as a rule formed of the names of the hero and heroine, as 'Khusrev and Shfrin;' in the case of didactic poems they are often purely fanciful, as Nefhat-ul- Ezhar 'The Waft of the Flowers;' sometimes the title may be indicative of the subject of the work, as Saqi-Name 'The Book of the Cupbearer,' which is the name of many poems dealing with the pleasures of wine w^hether literal or allegoric. Qasidas are often distinguished by a title taken from the subject of the exordium, or from the word that forms the redif, or, where there is no redi'f, from the last letter of the rhyming words. Thus a Qasida-i Behariya or 'Spring Qasi'da,' is one the exordium of which describes the spring season, a Gul Qasidasi or 'Rose Qasi'da' is one where the word " ' ' gul or rose forms the redif, and a Qasida-i Ra^iye or R Qasida' is one in which the rhyme- words end in the let- ter R. LLbas-i husnina goz dikdi "^alem: Niqdb-i zulfini ref" etdi didem. 'On the vestment of her beauty did the world fw its gaze; ' set aside the veil of e. I her face My eye her curls (i. saw through them).' To get at the solution here we see the 'eye' must 'set aside' or replace the 'curl.' Now the word for 'eye' in the verse is h^Xj^ (dide), but there is another word with the same ^^^ ^^is word meaning, namely r-y*;^ C*yi^)i is also the name of the letter c to holds ; again, according a convention that in Enigmas the word -curl' may be used (because of the form of a curl) to represent the letter J. -
Thirst for Wisdom, Lust for Conquest: Ahmedi's 14Th Century
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository THIRST FOR WISDOM, LUST FOR CONQUEST: AHMEDI’S 14TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ALEXANDER ROMANCE A Master’s Thesis by KAMİL ERDEM GÜLER The Department of History İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara September 2013 To Dr.Ulya Ertem THIRST FOR WISDOM, LUST FOR CONQUEST: AHMEDI’S 14TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ALEXANDER ROMANCE Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by KAMİL ERDEM GÜLER In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2013 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. ......................................... Dr. Evgenia Kermeli-ÜNAL Thesis Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. ......................................... Prof. Dr. Özer ERGENÇ Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. ........................................... Prof. Dr. Semih TEZCAN Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences. ........................................... Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT THIRST FOR WISDOM, LUST FOR CONQUEST: AHMEDI’S 14TH CENTURY OTTOMAN ALEXANDER ROMANCE Güler, Kamil Erdem M.A., Department of History, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Supervisor: Dr. -
Necâtî Bey Divanı'nda Irsâl-I Mesel Ve Temsîlî Teşbih
T.C. İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TÜRK DİLİ VE EDEBİYATI ANA BİLİM DALI ESKİ TÜRK EDEBİYATI BİLİM DALI NECÂTÎ BEY DİVANI’NDA İRSÂL-İ MESEL VE TEMSÎLÎ TEŞBİH Orhan AY Danışman Doç. Dr. Cafer MUM YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ MALATYA-2016 T.C. İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TÜRK DİLİ VE EDEBİYATI ANA BİLİM DALI ESKİ TÜRK EDEBİYATI BİLİM DALI NECÂTÎ BEY DİVANI’NDA İRSÂL-İ MESEL VE TEMSÎLÎ TEŞBÎH Orhan AY Danışman Doç. Dr. Cafer MUM YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ MALATYA-2016 i BİLDİRİM Hazırladığım tezin tamamen kendi çalışmam olduğunu ve her alıntıya kaynak gösterdiğimi taahhüt eder, tezimin kâğıt ve elektronik kopyalarının İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü arşivlerinde aşağıda belirttiğim koşulda izin verdiğimi onaylarım: • Tezimin tamamı her yerden erişime açılabilir. 14.11.2016 Orhan AY ii ONUR SÖZÜ "Doç. Dr. Cafer Mum’un danışmanlığında Yüksek Lisans Tezi olarak hazırladığım NECÂTÎ BEY DİVANI’NDA İRSÂL-İ MESEL VE TEMSÎLÎ TEŞBÎH başlıklı bu çalışmanın, bilimsel ahlak ve geleneklere aykırı düşecek bir yardıma başvurmaksızın tarafımdan yazıldığını ve yararlandığım bütün yapıtların hem metin içinde hem de kaynakçada yöntemine uygun biçimde gösterilenlerden oluştuğunu belirtir, bunu onurumla doğrularım. " Orhan AY iii NECÂTÎ BEY DİVANI’NDA İRSÂL-İ MESEL VE TEMSÎLÎ TEŞBÎH ORHAN AY İÇİNDEKLER ONUR SÖZÜ ................................................................................................................................ iii ÖN SÖZ ....................................................................................................................................... -
A History of Ottoman Poetry
20I sionally, but not often, tells a story, and sometimes indulges in a little fine language. He is, moreover, the last Tezkire- writer to attempt a complete survey of the field of Ottoman poetry, to start at the' beginning and carry the thread down to the time of writing. The subsequent biographers take up the story at about the point where it is left off by the preceding writer to whose work they mean their own to be a continuation, always bringing the history down to the year in which they write. Riyazi was a poet of some distinction, and as we shall have occasion to speak of his career more fully later on, it is enough to say here that he was born in 980 (1572— 3) and died in 1054 (1644). His Tezkirc, which is of very con- siderable value, is dedicated to Sultan Ahmed I and was begun in the year 10 16 (1607 — 8) and completed in the Rejcb of 10 1 8 (1609). In the preface the author takes credit to himself, justly enough, for having avoided prolixity in language, lest it should prove a 'cause of weariness to the reader and the writer.' He also claims to be more critical than his predecessors who, he says, have inserted in their 'iczkires poets and poetasters alike, while he has admitted the poets (Jiily, turning the others out. In like manner he has perused the entire wcjrks of nearly all the poets he inchules, and chosen as examples such verses only as are really worthy of commendation, while the otlu-r biographers iiave not given themselves this trouble, {•"iiially, lie professes to he \n:yU:rA\y inipaifial in his criticisms, cxtollin).; no man !>) nason ol Im(Im1'.1ii|) 01 coniniinnt )' o| aitn, and \\ it hholdint; due IHiiiM- liMHi none !)(•(, Ill, (• III |)(i soiial aversion. -
Pan-Eurasian Expansions, Ca. 1400–1600
part one Pan-Eurasian Expansions, ca. 1400–1600 1 Imperial Ambitions, Mystical Aspirations Persian Learning in the Ottoman World Murat Umut Inan The preface to the 1504 commentary on the introduction to the Gulistan (Rose Garden) of Sa‘di (d. 1292) of the Ottoman scholar Lami‘i Çelebi (d. 1532), a Naqshbandi Sufi translator of the Timurid-era Sufi poet ‘Abd al-Rahman Jami (d. 1492), begins: It should be known that Persian is a language built upon beauty and elegance. Dari is another name of Persian. Lexicographers explain the reason [why Persian is also called Dari] as follows: Bahram Gur forbade the people in his palace to speak in Persian and to write the letters and edicts in Persian. Because at that time the language became associated with his palace, people called it Dari. Since this language is founded on elegance, its alphabet does not include many letters [that ,Second .[ث] ”are found in the Arabic alphabet]. First, it does not have the letter “s The words that are pronounced in this language .[ح] ”it does not have the letter “h are either of Arabic origin or borrowed from another language or have [ح] ”with “h which is a common word in ,[ﺤﻴﺰ] ”been corrupted by common use. The word “hiz but people ,[ﻩ] ”Persian, means catamite. This word was originally spelled with “h As a .[ح] ”have corrupted the word, pronounced it harshly and spelled it with “h matter of fact, if one looks at Asadi Tusi’s [d. 1072–73] Mustashhadat [Evidences], Hindushah Nakhichawani’s [d. ca. -
T.C. Firat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Türk Dili Ve Edebiyati Ana Bilim Dali
T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TÜRK DİLİ VE EDEBİYATI ANA BİLİM DALI NEDİM’İN SANATI ÜZERİNE BİR TAHLİL DENEMESİ DOKTORA TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. Sabahattin KÜÇÜK Abdulmuttalip İPEK Elazığ - 2013 T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TÜRK DİLİ VE EDEBİYATI ANA BİLİM DALI NEDİM’İN SANATI ÜZERİNE BİR TAHLİL DENEMESİ DOKTORA TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. Sabahattin KÜÇÜK Abdulmuttalip İPEK Jürimiz, 07.06.2013 tarihinde yapılan tez savunma sınavı sonunda bu doktora tezini oy birliği ile başarılı saymıştır. Jüri Üyeleri: 1. Prof. Dr. Sabahattin KÜÇÜK 2. Prof. Dr. İ. Çetin DERDİYOK 3. Prof. Dr. Ali YILDIRIM 4. Prof. Dr. Şener DEMİREL 5. Yrd. Doç. Dr. Bedri AYDOĞAN F. Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yönetim Kurulunun ..... / ..... / ........... tarih ve ........... sayılı kararıyla bu tezin kabulü onaylanmıştır. Prof. Dr. Enver ÇAKAR Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü II ÖZET Doktora Tezi Nedim’in Sanatı Üzerine Bir Tahlil Denemesi Abdulmuttalip İPEK Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı Eski Türk Edebiyatı Bilim Dalı Elazığ – 2013, Sayfa: IX + 329 XVIII. yüzyıl divan şairi Nedim, klasik Türk şiirinin en tanınmış şahsiyetlerindendir. Yaşadığı dönemden günümüze kadar neredeyse üç asır geçmiş olmasına rağmen onun şiir dünyamızdaki etkisi hâlâ devam etmektedir. Nedim’in sanatı üzerine bir tahlil denemesi olan bu çalışmada, geleneksel tahlil yönteminin dışında kimi çağdaş edebiyat kuram ve eleştirilerinden de istifade edilmiş; şairin sanatını belirgin kılan hususlar, kısa bir girişten sonra dört ana bölümde incelemeye tabi tutulmuştur. Bu bölümler, klasik divan tahlili şablonuna göre yapılmayıp ana ve alt başlıklar, okumalar esnasında karşılaşılan birtakım soru ve sorunlardan hareketle oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma neticesinde elde edilen tespit ve değerlendirmeler ise “Sonuç” başlığı altında verilmiştir. -
10.Sinif Türk Dili Ve Edebiyati
10.SINIF TÜRK DİLİ VE EDEBİYATI EDEBİYATIN TARİH VE DİN İLE İLİŞKİSİ felsefesinden ayrı değerlendirmemiz gerektiğini gözler Edebiyat-Tarih İlişkisi önüne serer. Sanatçılar gerek dini konular hakkında Edebiyat öyle bir sanat dalıdır ki içinde birçok bilimin bilgi vermek gerekse Allah’a ve Hz. Muhammed’e olan ve sanatın derin izlerini görebilirsiniz. Edebiyatı diğer sevgilerini dile getirmek için edebiyatı bir araç olarak sanat dallarından ve bilimden ayrı düşünmek adeta kullanmışlardır. Örneğin Fuzuli, Su Kasidesi adlı edebiyatı yok etmektir. Aslında edebiyat yaşamın adeta eserinde Peygamberimizi övmüş ve ona olan sevgisini özeti gibidir. Bu nedenle çevresindeki her şeyden çok güzel bir şekilde dile getirmiştir. Yine aynı şekilde etkilenmektedir. Süleyman Çelebi, Mevlid (Vesîletün Necât) adlı Edebiyatın en yoğun ilişki kurduğu bilim dallarının mesnevisinde Hz. Muhammed’i doğum gününde anmış başında tarih gelmektedir. Öyle ki tarih biliminin ona olan sevgisini dile getirmiştir. Bunun yanında Hz. inceleme yöntemleri baz alınarak edebiyat tarihi bilimi Peygamber’imizin hayatını anlatan “Siyer” kitapları, ortaya çıkmıştır. Edebiyat tarihi yüzyıllar boyunca bir dini konuları içeren “ilahi” türü ve mevlit dinin milletin ortaya koyduğu tüm edebiyat eserlerinin, edebiyatla ne kadar içli dışlı olduğunun kanıtıdır. yazarların ve edebi akımları derinlemesine incelemektedir. Bu bakımdan edebiyatın tarihten TÜRK EDEBİYATININ DÖNEMLERİ yararlandığını söyleyebiliriz. Eski dönemler hakkında Türk Edebiyatının dönemlere ayrılmasındaki ölçütler; araştırma yapan bir tarihçi dönemin zihniyeti hakkında bilgi edinmek için o dönemde yazılmış bir edebi ➢ Dil anlayışı eserden yararlanabilir. Örneğin Kurtuluş Savaşı’na ➢ Dini hayat yakından tanıklık eden Halide Edip Adıvar’ın Ateşten ➢ Kültürel farklılaşma Gömlek adlı romanı dönemi yansıtması bakımından ➢ Sanat anlayışı son derece önemli bir eserdir. Kurtuluş Savaşı hakkında ➢ Coğrafya değişimi araştırma yapan bir tarihçinin dönemin zihniyetini ➢ Lehçe ve şive ayrılıkları etkili olmuştur. -
A History of Ottoman Poetry
51 marks an epoch; for although it docs not diftcr in the least in purpose from the lyrical work of Ahmedi and other similar writers, not only is it more highly finished and therefore — looking to the ideals of the school — more successful than theirs, but it is the first truly artistic verse in that dialect which was destined to be used, to the practical exclusion of all others, for literature among the Turks of the West. So much is this the case that, as was said on a previous page, ' the history of strictly Ottoman poetry begins with this writer. There certainly had been Ottoman poets before him, such as Suleyman and Yaziji-oghli; but those early workers stand as it were isolated, outside the line of develop- ment of this poetry. They were but dialect-poets, writers in one out of a number of sister-dialects; they had no followers, their verses influenced no successor ; Ahmed would have written just as, he did, had they never lived. With Ahmed it is altogether different; he founded a school, he inaugurated a period ; all the lyric poets who succeeded, down to the time of Baqi who died in 1008 (1600), followed in the way he led. Many among them far surpassed him, but they did not deviate from the path that he marked out. "^Ashiq and Hasan, both of whom wrote while the style which Ahmed established was still exclusively followed, are in agreement here ; the former observing that it is universally admitted that he was the leader of the poets of Riim, and of more importance than all his predecessors; and the latter, that as he was the earliest to give grace and force to Turkish poetry, he is the 'First Master', and that the robe of his verse is embroidered with the saying 'Honour to the pioneer;'- for in truth before his time Turkish poetry was barren of grace ' Vol. -
Turkish Literature of the Period of Sultan Süleyman the Magnificent I*
Divan Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Dergisi 18, İstanbul 2017, 563-623. Turkish Literature of the ÂMİL ÇELEBİOĞLU Period of Sultan Süleyman The Magnificent I Turkish literature of the times of Sultan Süleyman the Lawgiver, given the well deserved title by his European peers, was just as Makalenin Geliş Tarihi/ Date of entry of the article: 16.04.2017/ Kabul Tarihi/Acceptance date: 18.05.2017 This article was previously published in a book: Tülay Duran (ed.), The Ottoman Empire in the reign of Süleyman the magnificent, The Foundation for Establishing and Promoting Centers for Historical Research and Documentation, II, İstanbul 1988, p. 61-119. Prof. Dr. Republic of Turkey Marmara University Faculty of Science Literature. Amil Çelebioğlu was born on April 20, 1934 as a son of a Mevlevi family in Karaman. In 1941, he came to Istanbul with his family and completed his primary, secondary and high school education in Istanbul. He completed his university education at the department of Turkish Language and Literature in Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters (1961). After graduation he worked as a teacher and lecturer in Konya (1964-1966). In 1966 he became a research assistant in his graduated department Istanbul University (1966). At the end of his studies he became professor of Old Turkish Literature in 1982. He became faculty member and administrator in Konya Selçuk University, Erzurum University, Ankara Hacet- tepe University and lastly Marmara University. He specialized at Ottoman period classical literature together with completely knew Turkish literature. His works fully reflect Turkish literature. His works are 10 books and about 50 articles and papers. -
A History of Ottoman Poetry
. 'God hath Treasuries aneath the Throne, the Keys whereof are the Tongues of the Poets.' H a d i s - i S h e r i f HISTORY OF OTTOMAN POETRY BY THE LATE E. J. W. GIBB, M. R. A. S. VOLUME II EDITED BY EDWARD G. BROWNE, M. A., M. B., SIR THOMAS ADAMS' PROFESSOR OF ARABIC AND FEIJ.OW OF PEMBROKE COLLEGE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. LONDON LUZAC & CO., GREAT RUSSELL STREET 1902 LEYDEN. PRINTED HY E. J. BRILL. EDITOR'S PREFACE. The sad circumstances which led to my becoming respon- sible for the editing of this and the succeeding volumes of the History of Ottoman Poetry are known to all those who are interested in Oriental scholarship, and are fully set forth in the Athenaeum for January i8, 1902, pp. 81 — 82, and the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society for April, 1902, pp. 486 —489. Nevertheless it seems to me desirable to begin my Preface to this the first posthumous volume of my late friend's great and admirable work with a brief notice of his life, a life wholly devoted and consecrated to learning and fruitful labour of research, but cut short, alas! in its very prime by premature and unexpected death. Elias John Wilkinson Gibb was born at Glasgow on June 3, 1857, and received his education in that city, first at Park School under Dr. Collier, the author of the History of England, and afterwards at the University. It appears that him from an early age linguistic studies especially attracted ; but I have not been able to ascertain exactly how and when his attention first became directed to the Ofient, though I believe that here, as in many other cases, it was the fascination of the Arabian A'ights which first cast over him the spell of the East.