Hills M2 Upgrade Community Update Jan-March 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Strategic Review of the Westconnex Proposal: Final Report
Strategic Review of the WestConnex Proposal Final Report City of Sydney February 2015 140511-Final Report_150409 This report has been prepared for City of Sydney. SGS Economics and Planning has taken all due care in the preparation of this report. However, SGS and its associated consultants are not liable to any person or entity for any damage or loss that has occurred, or may occur, in relation to that person or entity taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd ACN 007 437 729 www.sgsep.com.au Offices in Canberra, Hobart, Melbourne and Sydney 140511-Final Report_150409 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 THE ECONOMIC AND TRANSPORT CONTEXT 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Recent employment growth 5 2.1 Historic population growth and distribution 7 2.1 Transport movements over time 8 2.2 Planning response to date 13 2.3 Significant future infrastructure 14 2.4 Key observations 14 3 ABOUT WESTCONNEX 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 Project history 16 Original route (2012) 16 Updated WestConnex Route (2013) 18 Updated WestConnex Route (2014) 19 3.3 WestConnex Policy Alignment 21 3.4 Summary 23 4 STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT OF WESTCONNEX 24 4.1 Introduction 24 4.2 Strong population growth in Western Sydney with employment growth in Sydney’s East 24 Origin-destination evidence 24 Journey to work – to Sydney CBD 25 Journey to work – to Global Economic Corridor (GEC) 27 Journey to work – to Eastern Sydney 28 Journey to work – from Eastern Sydney 29 Employment type 30 Corridor growth 31 4.3 Urban renewal along Parramatta Road 32 4.4 The economic stimulus of WestConnex 34 4.5 The cost, benefits and risks of WestConnex 35 NSW Auditor-General Review (2014) 36 4.6 Summary of findings 37 5 STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES TO WESTCONNEX 39 5.1 Introduction 39 5.2 Strategic alternatives 40 West Metro 40 Road Pricing 41 Wider Public Transport Investments 42 Other considerations 43 6 CONCLUDING REMARKS 44 APPENDIX 1. -
Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Scoping Report BLANK PAGE Document Controls
October 2017 Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Scoping Report BLANK PAGE Document controls Title: Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Scoping report Approval and authorisation Prepared by: Arcadis | Jacobs Accepted on behalf of Roads and Maritime Camilla Drover Services NSW by: Executive Director Motorways Signed: Date: 30/10/2017 Location File name BL_Scoping Report_Final Document status Date Final Scoping Report 30 October 2017 © Roads and Maritime Services NSW Executive summary Introduction and need The Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link is a NSW Government initiative to provide additional road network capacity across Sydney Harbour and to improve connectivity with Sydney’s northern beaches. The Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link program of works includes: The Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade project, comprising a new tolled motorway tunnel connection across Sydney Harbour, and the Warringah Freeway Upgrade to integrate the new motorway infrastructure with the existing road network and to connect to the Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection The Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection, including a new tolled motorway tunnel connection from the Warringah Freeway to Balgowlah and Frenchs Forest, and upgrade and integration works to connect to the Gore Hill Freeway. This scoping report relates to the Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection (the project). A separate application and scoping report has been prepared for the Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade project. The project would involve construction and operation of a 7.5 kilometre, tolled twin tunnel motorway to improve transport connections to the Northern Beaches, reduce road congestion, improve amenity and provide better access to employment centres. -
This Is an Objection to Many Aspects of the Proposed Northconnex Tunnel
SUMMARY OF CONCERNS IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED NORTHCONNEX TUNNEL This is an objection to many aspects of the proposed NorthConnex tunnel. We would like to record that we are in favour of a tunnel linking the M2 with the F3 / M1. We see this as a necessary improvement to The Hills Area and the Sydney road network as a whole. It will clearly benefit most residents along the Pennant Hills Road corridor. It will also greatly benefit the long-haul freight vehicles travelling between Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland. However, on careful reading of the NorthConnex Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), we have serious concerns with regard to the tunnel project as it is currently proposed in the EIS. Our concerns are detailed in six sections which show the changes we consider necessary to make the project acceptable. Section A - Page 2 The connectivity of the NorthConnex Southern Ventilation facility at the Southern Interchange, the southbound tunnel in particular. Section B - Page 16 The location and operation of the NorthConnex Southern Ventilation facility at the Southern Interchange. Section C - Page 17 Air Quality and Health. Section D - Page 20 Traffic arrangements during and after the construction of the Northconnex tunnel. Section E - Page 22 The restoration and preservation of the landscape around residential properties. Section F - Page 23 Involvement in the consultation process after the closure date for submissions in relation to the EIS. Date: 6 August 2014 Page 1 of 23 SECTION A: THE CONNECTIVITY OF NORTHCONNEX SOUTHERN VENTILATION FACILITY AT THE SOUTHERN INTERCHANGE, THE SOUTHBOUND TUNNEL IN PARTICULAR On careful reading of the NorthConnex Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) , which purports to include all details of the project construction We find that there is no detailed description of how and where the southbound tunnel will be connected to the ventilation facility at the southern interchange. -
John Marinovich Director
John Marinovich Director Areas of Expertise Planning, Programming, Project Management, Dispute Resolution Industries Infrastructure, Roads, Resource & Mining, ICT Qualifications Bachelor of Applied Science (Building) Post Graduate Diploma Project Management Accredited Expert Witness (RICS) Certificate in SOPA Adjudication (NSW) Key Experiences John joined TBH as a consultant in 1989 and has been a Director since 2004. He has over 30 years’ experience in the construction and infrastructure industries, with a particular emphasis on project delivery and planning advice, contractual claims and dispute advice. John has been responsible for providing advice on project strategies, time management of design, procurement, construction and commissioning, contract management, risk management, value management and the preparation and, or defence of contractual claims. John has worked on several major capital works program projects, undertaking the role of project co-ordinator throughout the design, documentation, tender, construction and commissioning phases. Prior to joining TBH, John worked for developers and building companies with on-site and office positions and gained experience in contract administration, estimating, tender preparation and project planning. A Director of TBH since 2004, John has been responsible for providing advice on the project delivery strategies and control of time on numerous projects. John Marinovich | tbhconsultancy.com John’s work at TBH includes: Project Management Advice • Providing advice to various clients (public -
ASX Release Template
asx release 2 February 2015 Financial Close on the NorthConnex Project in NSW Transurban, along with its partners in the Westlink M7, announces financial close on the NorthConnex project in Sydney, NSW. This represents the culmination of a process initiated and led by Transurban that began with the submission of an unsolicited proposal to the NSW Government in March 2012. Key project details remain consistent with the in-principle agreement announced in May 2013, when the project progressed into Stage 3 of the unsolicited proposal assessment process. NorthConnex project construction and capital cost The NorthConnex project includes the following construction and capital costs: • Nine kilometre tolled twin tunnels connecting the southern end of the M1 Pacific Highway at Wahroonga to the Hills M2 Motorway at the Pennant Hills Road interchange; • Total project cost of approximately $2.9 billion, which includes a fixed price Design and Construction contract to be delivered by a Lend Lease / Bouygues Construction joint venture, together with development, planning, approvals, and financing costs; • Combined Federal and NSW Government contribution of circa $800 million; • Construction will commence early in 2015 and is expected to be complete by the end of 2019; and • M7 and NorthConnex to be wholly owned by the umbrella entity known as North West Roads Group. Transurban will own 50% of the North West Roads Group. NorthConnex project financial returns The NorthConnex project will deliver financial returns principally through the following sources: • Toll revenue derived from the NorthConnex tunnel through a concession agreement until 2048, governed by pricing that is aligned with the Hills M2 main toll point (currently cars $6.36 and trucks $19.06) and quarterly escalation of CPI or one percent (whichever is greater); and • M7 concession adjustments comprising a concession extension to June 2048 (11.4 years) and an increase in the truck toll multiplier to three times the rate for cars (currently parity with cars) commencing in early February 2015. -
Submission to Senate Committee Inquiry Into Operations of Existing and Proposed Toll Roads in Australia
Submission to Senate Committee Inquiry into Operations of existing and proposed toll roads in Australia This document contains the formal submission made by WestConnex Action Group Incorporated (WAG) to the aforementioned Inquiry. We would welcome the opportunity to appear before the Committee. We also urge the Committee to hold at least one hearing in Western Sydney so that its community has an opportunity to present its views. WAG is a community group made up of residents from across western, inner and southwest Sydney. We are not affiliated with any political party. For enquiries relating to this submission, please contact us at: WestConnex Action Group PO Box 3249 Marrickville Metro NSW 2204 [email protected] 1.0 Terms of reference We note that the terms of reference for the Inquiry are as follows: Operations of existing and proposed toll roads in Australia, including: a. financial arrangements of existing and proposed private toll roads, and transparency, accountability and equity aspects of these arrangements; b. interaction of commercial considerations of private toll road operators with federal and state transport and infrastructure policy; and c. any other related matters. 2.0 Overview of issues covered in this submission 1 Due to the overlapping nature of these terms of reference, we have not dealt with the issue under those specific headings but instead dealt with the issues under the following headings. 1. Tolling regimes are designed to deliver private profit rather than ongoing public benefit. 2. Lack of transparency around tolling arrangements 3. New tolls levied on existing motorways to subsidise other toll roads 4. -
Westconnex Acquisition
WestConnex Acquisition Transurban equity raising For personal use only For illustrative purposes only and is not indicative of distance, proximity or scale. NOT FOR RELEASE OR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES Disclaimer This investor presentation (“Presentation”) has been prepared by Transurban Holdings Limited (ACN 098 143 429), Transurban International Limited (ACN 121 746 825) and Transurban Infrastructure Management Limited (ACN 098 147 678; AFSL 246585) as the responsible entity of Transurban Holding Trust (ARSN 098 807 419) (together, “Transurban”). This Presentation has been prepared in relation to a pro rata accelerated renounceable entitlement offer of new Transurban stapled securities (“New Securities”) with retail entitlements trading, to be made to: • eligible institutional security holders of Transurban (“Institutional Entitlement Offer”); and • eligible retail security holders of Transurban (“Retail Entitlement Offer”), under sections 708AA and 1012DAA of the Corporations Act as modified by ASIC Corporations (Non-Traditional Rights Issues) Instrument 2016/84 and ASIC Corporations (Disregarding Technical Relief) Instrument 2016/73 (together, the “Entitlement Offer”). Unless the context otherwise requires, capitalised terms and abbreviations have the meaning given in the glossary at the end of this Presentation. SUMMARY INFORMATION This Presentation contains summary information about the current activities of Transurban and its subsidiaries as at the date of this Presentation. The information in this Presentation is of a general nature and does not purport to be complete. This Presentation does not purport to contain all of the information that an investor should consider when making an investment decision nor does it contain all of the information which would be required in a product disclosure statement or prospectus prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act. -
Surface Transportation
Reason Foundation April 2012 Annual Privatization Report 2011: Surface Transportation By Robert W. Poole, Jr. Edited by Leonard Gilroy and Harris Kenny Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. Copyright © 2012 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Annual Privatization Report 2011: Surface Transportation By Robert W. Poole, Jr. Edited by Leonard Gilroy and Harris Kenny This is an excerpt from Reason’s Annual Privatization Report, which is available online at http://reason.org/apr2011 -
Beaches Link Tunnel Project Submission from the Balgowlah Residents Group
Beaches Link Tunnel Project Submission from the Balgowlah Residents Group 1 March 2021 Extracts from the Report of Justice David Kirby into the Preservation of the Warringah Corridor for a Freeway, Sept 1983 From page 4: From page 5: 1 Table of Contents Preamble EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Objectives of Building the Beaches Link Tunnel Project 8 1.1. SEARS Requirements 8 1.1.1. Objectives of the Project 8 1.1.2. Alternatives to the Project 8 1.1.3. Benefits of the Program of Works for the Beaches Link Tunnel 9 1.1.4. Scenarios used for Operational Modelling within EIS 9 1.2. Benefits Claimed by TfNSW 10 1.3. Time Savings 10 1.4. Improvement in Traffic Flows on Congested Roads 11 1.5. Forecast Traffic in 2037 11 1.5.1. Implausibility of the Traffic Forecast for 2037 11 1.5.2. Importance and Relevance of the TfNSW Traffic Flow Forecast for 2037 12 1.5.3. Adoption of WFH by Residents in the Northern Beaches 13 1.5.4. Infrastructure Australia 2021 Priority List 16 1.6. The Challenges in Forecasting Future Traffic Levels 17 1.7. The Lack of an Alternative to the Beaches Link Tunnel in the EIS 18 1.8. Conclusion 19 2. Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) of the Beaches Link Tunnel 21 2.1. Why Include a BCA in this Submission? 21 2.2. What is a Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) 23 2.3. The Major Benefits in the BCA for the Beaches Link Tunnel Project 23 2.4. The Major Costs in the BCA for the Beaches Link Tunnel Project 26 2.5. -
New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator's Guide
New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide 1 March 2019 New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Contents Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Approved Routes and Travel Restrictions ................................................................................................................ 3 1. Part 1 NSW Urban Zone ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Travel Restrictions in the NSW Urban Zone ................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1. Clearway and transit lane travel ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.2. Peak hour travel ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.3. Peak hour travel – Newcastle Outer Zone ............................................................................................... 4 1.1.4. Night travel ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.5. Sundays and state-wide public holidays ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.6. Public -
Willoughby City Council Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade Submission to Transport for NSW
Willoughby City Council Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade Submission to Transport for NSW Executive Summary The Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade project is a city shaping project that, if implemented, will have a significant impact on strategic planning for the communities, environments, transport and traffic movements within the Willoughby local area. Council has prepared this submission to identify and convey concerns regarding the impact on Council’s residents, assets and businesses caused by the Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade project, as detailed in the TfNSW Reference Documents. This submission also identifies issues requiring further clarification, improved accuracy and justification. The State Government is invited to respond to these issues upon receipt of this submission. In summary the issues relate to: • Strategic Planning Matters • Communication and engagement • Northern Beaches Link • Noise and Vibration • Social Impacts • Environment • Traffic and Transport Matters • Design Issues and Improvement Opportunities • Construction Traffic Management The complexity of EIS information was broken down and simplified through the introduction of the EIS guide to reduce the overwhelming extent of information into something more easily digestible. Regardless, residents have raised significant concern about the volume and density of information to be absorbed in a short period of time. Willoughby City Council EIS Submission - Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade Project It is unfortunate that no consideration has been given to changed consultation arrangements and stakeholder submissions in light of the impact of State and Federal Government advice and legislation arising from the COVID-19 global pandemic. No engagement with Councillors and key Council personnel across the organisation was offered in the lead up to, nor during, the EIS exhibition period. -
Annual Report 2002 T Ransurban Annual Report 2002
6550 TRAN Cover(prntchange) 26/9/02 4:26 PM Page 1 Annual Report 2002 T ransurban Annual Report ransurban Annual Report 2002 www.transurban.com.au 6550 TRAN Cover(prntchange) 26/9/02 4:26 PM Page 2 Enquiries and Information Enquiries About Your Stapled Securities The Stapled Securities Register is maintained by Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited. If you have a question about your Transurban Securities, transfer of securities or distributions, please contact: Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited. Level Twelve, 565 Bourke Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000. Enquiries (within Australia) 1300 850 505 (outside Australia) +613 9615 5970 Facsimile +613 9611 5710 Enquiries About Transurban Contact Transurban’s Investor Relations: Manager, Investor Relations. Telephone + 613 9612 6999 Facsimile +613 9649 7380 Or write to: Manager, Investor Relations Transurban Group Level 43 Rialto South Tower, 525 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000. Emails may be sent to our web-site: www.transurban.com.au Stock Exchange Listing The Stapled Securities are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange under the name Transurban Group and under the code ’TCL’. The securities participate in the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS). Removal From Annual Report Mailing List Security Holders can nominate not to receive an Annual Report by written notice to the Stapled Securities Register. Security holders will continue to receive all other shareholder information, including Notice of Annual General Meeting and proxy form. Transurban Holdings Limited ABN 86 098 143 429 Transurban Holding Trust ARSN 098 807 419 Tax File Number (TFN) Information Transurban Infrastructure Developments Limited ABN 96 098 143 410 While it is not compulsory for security holders to provide a TFN, the Company is obliged to deduct tax from distributions or dividends to holders resident in Australia who have Registered Office not supplied such information.