Case 1:03-Md-01539-CCB Document 122 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 1 of 444

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case 1:03-Md-01539-CCB Document 122 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 1 of 444 Case 1:03-md-01539-CCB Document 122 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 1 of 444 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND x Civil No.: 1:03-MD-01539 IN RE ROYAL AHOLD N.V. SECURITIES & ERISA LITIGATION ALL SECURITIES ACTIONS x CONSOLIDATED AMENDED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Andrew J. Entwistle, Esq. (AE-6513) Stephen D. Oestreich, Esq. (SO-8933) Robert N. Cappucci, Esq. (RC-2193) Johnston de F. Whitman, Jr., Esq. (JW-5781) Jeffrey A. Klafter, Esq. (JK-0953) (Of Counsel) Asuncion C. Hostin, Esq. (MD Bar No. 24008) ENTWISTLE & CAPPUCCI LLP 299 Park Avenue, 14th Floor New York, New York 10171 Telephone: (212) 894-7200 Facsimile: (212) 894-7272 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs, the Public Employees’ Retirement Association of Colorado and Generic Trading of Philadelphia, LLC Andrew Radding, Esq. (Bar No. 00195) Gregory M. Kline, Esq. (Bar No. 14363) ADELBERG, RUDOW, DORF & HENDLER, LLC 600 Mercantile Bank & Trust Building 2 Hopkins Plaza Baltimore, MD 21201 (410) 539-5195 (410) 539-5834 Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs, the Public Employees’ Retirement Association of Colorado and Generic Trading of Philadelphia, LLC Case 1:03-md-01539-CCB Document 122 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 2 of 444 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ....................................................................................... 35 III. THE PARTIES.................................................................................................................. 39 A. The Public Employees’ Retirement Association of Colorado .......................................... 39 B. Generic Trading of Philadelphia, LLC ............................................................................. 40 C. The Ahold Defendants ...................................................................................................... 40 1. Royal Ahold N.V. ....................................................................................................... 40 2. Ahold USA.................................................................................................................. 42 3. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.................................................................................................. 43 D. The Deloitte Defendants ................................................................................................... 44 1. Deloitte & Touche LLP............................................................................................... 44 2. Deloitte & Touche Accountants.................................................................................. 44 E. The Individual Defendants................................................................................................ 45 1. Cees Van der Hoeven.................................................................................................. 47 2. Michiel Meurs............................................................................................................. 48 3. Henny de Ruiter.......................................................................................................... 50 4. Cor Boonstra ............................................................................................................... 50 5. James L. Miller ........................................................................................................... 51 6. Mark Kaiser................................................................................................................. 52 7. Michael Resnick.......................................................................................................... 53 8. Tim Lee....................................................................................................................... 54 9. Robert G. Tobin .......................................................................................................... 54 i Case 1:03-md-01539-CCB Document 122 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 3 of 444 10. William J. Grize .......................................................................................................... 55 11. Roland Fahlin.............................................................................................................. 55 12. Jan G. Andreae............................................................................................................ 56 F. THE UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS ......................................................................... 57 1. ABN AMRO Rothschild............................................................................................. 59 2. Goldman Sachs International...................................................................................... 60 3. Merrill Lynch International......................................................................................... 61 4. ING Bank N.V. ........................................................................................................... 62 5. Rabo Securities N.V.................................................................................................... 63 6. Kempen & Co. N.V..................................................................................................... 65 IV. SUMMARY OF AHOLD’S BUSINESS AND GROWTH............................................. 65 A. United States Acquisitions ................................................................................................ 72 1. Retail Acquisitions ...................................................................................................... 72 2. Food Service Acquisitions .......................................................................................... 73 B. European Acquisitions and Joint Ventures ....................................................................... 75 1. The Netherlands .......................................................................................................... 75 2. Poland.......................................................................................................................... 75 3. Spain............................................................................................................................ 76 C. Central American Acquisitions and Joint Ventures.......................................................... 77 D. South America Acquisitions and Joint Ventures .............................................................. 77 E. Asia Pacific Acquisitions.................................................................................................. 79 1. Malaysia...................................................................................................................... 79 2. Thailand ...................................................................................................................... 79 ii Case 1:03-md-01539-CCB Document 122 Filed 02/18/2004 Page 4 of 444 3. Indonesia ..................................................................................................................... 79 F. Scandinavian Acquisitions and Joint Ventures................................................................. 79 V. AHOLD’S FEBRUARY 24, 2003 ANNOUNCEMENT................................................. 79 VI. AHOLD COMMENCES INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS........................................... 88 VII. GOVERNMENTAL AND REGULATORY INVESTIGATIONS COMMENCE......... 90 A. The SEC Investigation...................................................................................................... 90 B. The Department of Justice Investigation.......................................................................... 91 C. The NYSE and NASD Investigations ............................................................................... 92 D. The Department of Labor Investigation............................................................................ 92 E. The Office of the Dutch Public Prosecutor’s Investigation.............................................. 92 F. The Euronext Investigation............................................................................................... 93 G. The Dutch Authority For Financial Markets’ Investigation............................................. 94 H. Investigation Relating To Illegal Payments in Argentina ................................................. 94 VIII. FURTHER DETAILS OF AHOLD’S FRAUD EMERGE .............................................. 95 A. USF’s Chief Financial Officer “Blew The Whistle” In 2000 After Ahold Acquired USF, But Defendants Ignored His Concerns .................................................... 95 B. USF Improperly Booked Vendor Rebate Income Since At Least 1997 ........................... 97 C. Federal Regulators Launch Probe Of USF’s Vendors...................................................... 98 D. The Internal Investigation Reveals Further Fraud At USF And Ahold Implicates Lee and Kaiser .................................................................................................................. 99 E. Ahold Terminates Defendants Miller and Resnick......................................................... 102 F. Ahold Disclses $24.8 Billion In Improper Revenues From The Company’s Joint Ventures ................................................................................................................. 105 G. Ahold Discloses Fraud At Its United States Retail Operations ...................................... 106 iii Case 1:03-md-01539-CCB Document 122
Recommended publications
  • Cesifo Working Paper No. 9137
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Argentesi, Elena; Buccirossi, Paolo; Cervone, Roberto; Duso, Tomaso; Marrazzo, Alessia Working Paper The Effect of Mergers on Variety in Grocery Retailing CESifo Working Paper, No. 9137 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Argentesi, Elena; Buccirossi, Paolo; Cervone, Roberto; Duso, Tomaso; Marrazzo, Alessia (2021) : The Effect of Mergers on Variety in Grocery Retailing, CESifo Working Paper, No. 9137, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/236679 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Retail Mergers on Prices and Variety: an Ex-Post Evaluation Elena Argentesi, Paolo Buccirossi, Roberto Cervone
    No 225 The Effect of Retail Mergers on Prices and Variety: An Ex-post Evaluation Elena Argentesi, Paolo Buccirossi, Roberto Cervone, Tomaso Duso, Alessia Marrazzo June 2016 IMPRINT DICE DISCUSSION PAPER Published by düsseldorf university press (dup) on behalf of Heinrich‐Heine‐Universität Düsseldorf, Faculty of Economics, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany www.dice.hhu.de Editor: Prof. Dr. Hans‐Theo Normann Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE) Phone: +49(0) 211‐81‐15125, e‐mail: [email protected] DICE DISCUSSION PAPER All rights reserved. Düsseldorf, Germany, 2016 ISSN 2190‐9938 (online) – ISBN 978‐3‐86304‐224‐0 The working papers published in the Series constitute work in progress circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comments. Views expressed represent exclusively the authors’ own opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of the editor. The Effect of Retail Mergers on Prices and Variety: An Ex-post Evaluation∗ Elena Argentesi,y Paolo Buccirossi,z Roberto Cervone,z Tomaso Duso,§ Alessia Marrazzo z June 2016 Abstract Unlike most retrospective merger studies that only focus on price effects, we also estimate the impact of a merger on product variety. We use an original dataset on Dutch supermarkets to assess the effect of a merger that was conditionally approved by the Dutch Competition Authority (ACM) on prices and the depth of assortment. We find that the merger did not affect prices but it led the merging parties to decrease the depth of their assortment, thereby reducing consumer choice. This effect is mainly driven by a reduction in variety for stores that were not re-branded after the merger, suggesting that the merging firms reposition their product offerings in order to avoid cannibalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilburg University Grocery Retail Dynamics and Store Choice Van Lin
    Tilburg University Grocery retail dynamics and store choice van Lin, Arjen Publication date: 2014 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): van Lin, A. (2014). Grocery retail dynamics and store choice. CentER, Center for Economic Research. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. sep. 2021 Grocery Retail Dynamics and Store Choice Arjen van Lin Grocery Retail Dynamics and Store Choice Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan Tilburg University op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. Ph. Eijlander, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op woensdag 18 juni 2014 om 16.15 uur door Arjen Ignatius Johan Gerard van Lin geboren op 21 mei 1986 te Haelen.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture Directory 2015 Download
    pg14_ASC.qxd 17/6/15 12:07 Page 14 14 AQUACULTURE ASC AQUACULTURE Aquaculture Stewardship Council Update ASC Feed Standard: driving Amsterdam for the ASC Responsible improvements in the Feed Project briefing event. Experts in aquaculture feed industry marine, plant and animal ingredients, as Feed is an essential element in farming, well as supply chain and feed mill repre- but it is also a major contributor to the sentatives, came together demonstrating overall environmental impact of aqua- that the sector is committed to a respon- culture. The environmental pressure sible future for fish feed production. ASC - a global initiative to created by the production of the key This year there will be two public move aquaculture towards ingredients in fish feed needs to be review rounds of the draft Feed Standard. The related audit manual that sustainable farming practices addressed. The ASC is developing a globally will guide auditors in applying the stan- The Aquaculture Stewardship Council’s applicable Responsible Feed Standard. A dard will then be developed, followed by (ASC) mission is to transform fish multi-stakeholder expert group includ- a field test for the standard and audit farming towards environmental sus- ing industry, scientists and conservation manual. tainability and social responsibility. group representatives has been carefully The ASC Responsible Feed Standard is ASC works with stakeholders around selected to develop the standard. The set to go live in the first quarter of 2016. the world including farmers, seafood feed standard will set requirements that When the standard is finalised it will be processors, retail and foodservice com- reflect industry best practice and devel- available for anyone who wants to use it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2016 01
    betterAnnual Reporttogether 2016 Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2016 01 Introduction Welcome to our first Annual Report as a merged company, Ahold Delhaize. In 2016, we brought two successful businesses together to In 2016, we brought two create one of the world’s largest retail groups, able to deliver even more for the customers of our great local brands. This is reflected in the theme of our report: Better together. It is also successful businesses together the name of our strategy, which you will find out more about as you read our report. We believe that our long-term financial to create one of the world’s success is directly tied to how well we manage our financial, natural, and human resources. For that reason, we have decided to publish one report that provides an integrated view largest retail groups, able of our sustainability performance as part of our overall company performance. Please read on to find out more about our to deliver even more for year and the good momentum we achieved following the merger. Our report outlines the progress our great local brands made on all the customers of our great our strategic priorities, including making our fresh offering even fresher, providing healthier choices for our customers, reducing waste, supporting our communities, expanding our local brands. online offering, making it easier to shop, and much more. Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2016 02 In this year’s report Overview Business review Governance Financials Investors 01 Introduction 20 Our Better Together strategy 73 Our Management Board
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Our Business in Europe
    Growing our business in Europe Sander van der Laan COO Ahold Europe / CEO Albert Heijn November 29, 2012 Proprietary and Company Confidential Key takeaways Still growth opportunities ahead for Albert Heijn in the Netherlands Leveraging our Albert Heijn format and business model in Flanders, Belgium Creating value with Albert in the Czech market Proprietary and Company Confidential Ahold Our joint Reshaping Retail framework Proprietary and Company Confidential 3 Europe we are proud of our strong brands Albert Heijn Supermarkets NL 125 years of • Est. 1887 • 815 stores local heritage • Market leader Albert Heijn New Markets >2,200 stores • 10 supermarkets Belgium • Two to go in Germany • 58 to gos in NL Serving a Albert Heijn Online trade area • Est. 2001 • Delivery and PUP’s (first two open) >40 million people • Market leader Etos In 5 countries • Est. 1918 • 538 stores • #2 in the market 96, 000 emp loyees Gall & Gall • Est. 1884 • 562 stores €12B+ sales • Market leader Czech Republic + Slovakia Joint ventures • Est. 1991 • 282 stores with ICA and JMR • #2 in the Czech market Bol.com • Est. 1999, joined Ahold 2012 • First 59 pick-up points in AH service counters • Market leader online Proprietary and Company Confidential 4 Europe We believe in complementary multi-format growth Discuss supermarkets today: Netherlands Still growth opportunities ahead for Albert Heijn Belgium LiAlbtLeveraging our Albert HijHeijn format and business model in Flanders Czech Republic Creating value with Albert in the CZ market small stores supermarkets online Proprietary and Company Confidential 5 Netherlands Albert Heijn remains the leading supermarket player, managing consistent growth in a tough and consolidating market 40 Main Market share Market share Market share NL 2007 2011 development supermarkets indicative 20 Nielsen Nielsen Albert Heijn 29.5% 33.5% 35.0+% 0 (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Sale of EMTÉ by Sligro Food Group to the Consortium of Jumbo and Coop Completed
    PRESS RELEASE Sale of EMTÉ by Sligro Food Group to the consortium of Jumbo and Coop completed Sligro Food Group N.V., Jumbo Groep Holding B.V. and Coop Holding B.V. announce that on 2 July 2018, they completed the transaction for the sale, announced on 5 March 2018, of all the shares in EMTÉ Holding B.V. and its subsidiaries EMTÉ Supermarkten B.V., EMTÉ Franchise B.V. and EMTÉ Vleescentrale B.V. by Sligro Food Group to the consortium of Jumbo and Coop. The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets The sale involves EMTÉ’s 130 supermarkets, its retail (ACM) had already approved the sale and the Works Councils distribution centres in Kapelle and Putten, its meat plant in had expressed a positive opinion. Jumbo and Coop will start Enschede and its supporting operational and commercial converting the EMTÉ supermarkets to their own formats this departments at the head office in Veghel. All employees autumn. Sligro Food Group will continue to provide certain involved will move to the consortium. support services to EMTÉ during the transition period in order to ensure a smooth handover of EMTÉ to Jumbo and Coop. Veghel/Velp, 2 July 2018, On behalf of the Executive Board On behalf of the Executive Board On behalf of the Executive Board Sligro Food Group N.V. Jumbo Groep Holding B.V. Coop Holding B.V. Koen Slippens Frits van Eerd Fred Bosch Rob van der Sluijs Ton van Veen Herco Boer 1 PROFILE About Sligro Food Group END OF PRESS RELEASE Sligro Food Group encompasses foodservice companies offering a complete range of food and food-related non-food items and services in the wholesale food and beverages For media enquiries: markets in the Netherlands and Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benelux Food Retail Market Retail Foods Netherlands
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 6/25/2012 GAIN Report Number: NL2014 Netherlands Retail Foods The Benelux Food Retail Market Approved By: Mary Ellen Smith Prepared By: Marcel Pinckaers Report Highlights: The turnover of the Benelux food retail industry for 2011 is estimated at € 56.3 billion. For 2012, turnover is expected to increase by 2.5 percent. The retail market is fairly consolidated. Top 3 food retailers in the Netherlands have a market share of 64 percent while in Belgium the leading 3 retailers have 72 percent of the market. Sustainable food (including organic products) is one of the most important growth markets in food retail. The market share for private label products continues to go up in both Belgium and the Netherlands. The demand for convenient, healthy and new innovative products continues to be strong. Post: The Hague SECTION I. MARKET SUMMARY Benelux Food Retail Market Approximately 80 percent of the Dutch food retail outlets are full service supermarkets, operating on floor space between 500 and 1,500 square meters located downtown and in residential areas. Retailers with full service supermarkets have responded to the need of the Dutch to have these supermarkets close to their house. The remaining 20 percent includes mainly convenience stores (near office buildings and train/metro stations), some wholesalers and just a few superstores (convenient located alongside highways in shopping malls and industrial parks). The Belgians show a different shopping pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.6588 - KONINKLIJKE AHOLD / VALK HOLDING
    EN Case No COMP/M.6588 - KONINKLIJKE AHOLD / VALK HOLDING Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 4(4) Date: 19.06.2012 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19/06/2012 C(2012)4300 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are MERGER PROCEDURE shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying party To the national Competition Authority Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No COMP/M.6588 - KONINKLIJKE AHOLD / VALK HOLDING Commission decision following a reasoned submission pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation No 139/20041 for referral of the case to the Netherlands I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 11 May 2012, the Commission received by means of a Reasoned Submission a referral request pursuant to Article 4(4) of the Merger Regulation with respect to the transaction cited above. The notifying Parties request the operation to be examined in its entirety by the competent authorities of the Netherlands. 2. According to Article 4(4) of the Merger Regulation, before a formal notification has been made to the Commission, the parties to the transaction may request that their transaction be referred in whole or in part from the Commission to the Member State where the concentration may significantly affect competition in a market which presents all the characteristics of a distinct market.
    [Show full text]
  • “Each Cultural Background Has It's Own Grocery Retail Format”
    Master Thesis “Each cultural background has it’s own grocery retail format” Student: Jihane Naji Student Number: 5802822 Date: 5 February 2014 (Final Version) First Supervisor: Drs. A.C.J. Meulemans Second Supervisor: Prof. Dr. J.H.J.P Tettero Preface ‘Hakuna matata’. I never thought that I could make it this far. I never dreamed that I could make the switch to economics after gaining my degree in molecular biology. Hard work, faith, belief in yourself, vision, determination, and dedication are the keywords to achieve anything what you ever want to accomplish in life. I shall be honest that it wasn’t easy at all, especially the fear of not be able to finish on time or whether my subject is well defined to receive an excellent grade, choked me up in a way that I never expected. In the end when the going gets tough the tough kept me going.. I want to thank first of all God for giving me the strength, enlightment and power, where shall I be without thou? Also I am very grateful with the beautiful people surrounding me giving me lots of energy, laughter and happiness to continue and never stop. Especially, the perfect guidance of Drs.Ing.Toon Meulemans helped me where I am now, finished and happy. Oh yeah, I mustn’t forget that music, my soul healer, also helped me a lot to keep on writing whilst singing. During my internship for the the Netherlands Consulate General in New York someone ever told me that a wise woman will make more opportunities than she finds.
    [Show full text]
  • GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network
    Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network Required Report - public distribution Date: 11/27/2002 GAIN Report #NL2059 The Netherlands Retail Food Sector Report 2002 Approved by: Philip A. Letarte U.S. Embassy, The Hague Prepared by: Marcel Pinckaers and Morgan Perkins Report Highlights: This report is an overview of the Dutch Retail Market. Includes PSD changes: No Includes Trade Matrix: No Unscheduled Report The Hague [NL1], NL GAIN Report #NL2059 Table of Contents Section I. Market Summary ..............................................1 Facts And Figures ..................................................1 Food Retail in Europe ...........................................1 Food Retail in the Netherlands ....................................2 Changes And Challenges Within Operating Companies And Formulas ............4 Section II. Road Map for Market Entry ......................................6 Entry Strategy .....................................................6 Market Structure ...................................................6 Company Profile ...................................................7 Section III. Competition ..................................................7 Section IV. Best Products Prospects .........................................8 Section V. Post Contact and Further Information ...............................8 Appendix I .............................................................9 GAIN Report #NL2059 Page 1 of 14 Section I. Market Summary Facts And Figures Food Retail in Europe
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Shops Ban 'Anaemic Veal' Over Animal Rights Concerns
    Digital Journal: Your News Network Page 1 of 4 http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/269237 Posted Mar 15, 2009 by ■ Adriana Stuijt Dutch shops ban 'anaemic veal' over animal rights concerns Animal-rights group Wakker Dier in The Netherlands -- which country is also Europe's largest veal-producers with 1,5million veal calves a year -- says they launched the campaign urging consumers not to buy this veal 'because pale veal is raised by keeping the calves deliberately ill, fed on a low-iron milk diet and kept Wakker Dier Animal Rights NL stabled in small cages. They never see the light of day'... Pale veal is 'manufactured' by keeping the young animals penned up and fed on a low- Dutch supermarkets Jumbo, Plus, Aldi, Lidl, Boon, Coop, Dekamarkt, Hoogvliet, iron milk diet for six months. A Nettorama, Poiesz, Sanders, Emté, Spar en Vomar have all undertaken to stop Dutch animal rights campaign selling the pale veal within the next few months - also because the Wakker Dier has managed to get this veal out of most supermarkets now. publicity campaign created a high level of consumer awareness, and people stopped buying it. Vote it up! Supermarket chain managers who were convinced almost immediately after viewing the publicity material from Wakker Dier, Dirk, C1000, Super de Boer, AH, Bas, Digros and Deen, stopped selling the pale veal within weeks from the start of the campaign in September 2008. "We are happy that with this campaign, nearly all the anaemic veal has now disappeared from our supermarkets,' said a spokesman for Wakker Dier.
    [Show full text]