The Benelux Food Retail Market Retail Foods Netherlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Benelux Food Retail Market Retail Foods Netherlands THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 6/25/2012 GAIN Report Number: NL2014 Netherlands Retail Foods The Benelux Food Retail Market Approved By: Mary Ellen Smith Prepared By: Marcel Pinckaers Report Highlights: The turnover of the Benelux food retail industry for 2011 is estimated at € 56.3 billion. For 2012, turnover is expected to increase by 2.5 percent. The retail market is fairly consolidated. Top 3 food retailers in the Netherlands have a market share of 64 percent while in Belgium the leading 3 retailers have 72 percent of the market. Sustainable food (including organic products) is one of the most important growth markets in food retail. The market share for private label products continues to go up in both Belgium and the Netherlands. The demand for convenient, healthy and new innovative products continues to be strong. Post: The Hague SECTION I. MARKET SUMMARY Benelux Food Retail Market Approximately 80 percent of the Dutch food retail outlets are full service supermarkets, operating on floor space between 500 and 1,500 square meters located downtown and in residential areas. Retailers with full service supermarkets have responded to the need of the Dutch to have these supermarkets close to their house. The remaining 20 percent includes mainly convenience stores (near office buildings and train/metro stations), some wholesalers and just a few superstores (convenient located alongside highways in shopping malls and industrial parks). The Belgians show a different shopping pattern. They prefer large supermarkets and superstores that are easy to access by car. In addition they increasingly appreciate having much smaller convenience stores, or superettes, close to their homes. In Belgium, full service supermarkets therefore account for an estimated 55 percent of the market. The share of convenience stores, superstores and wholesalers in Belgium is much higher than in the Netherlands, an estimated 45 percent. In all markets, independent food retail stores are increasingly leaving the scene. Shrinking margins and on-going consolidation in the retail market drive this trend. Top 3 food retailers in the Netherlands, Albert Heijn, Jumbo (C1000, Jumbo and Super de Boer) and Aldi, have a market share of 64 percent. The market for discounters like Aldi and Lidl has decreased to 13.5 percent. Dutch discounters like Bas van der Heijden, Dirk van den Heijden and Digros were able to maintain their share of the market. In Belgium, the leading 3 retailers have 72 percent of the market. The market share of the Belgium discounter Colruyt also grew at the expense of German based Aldi and Lidl. Table 1: Market Shares of Leading Food Retailers Netherlands Belgium Company: Market share, percentage: Company: Market share, percentage: Albert Heijn 33.6 Colruyt 27.1 C1000* (Jumbo) 11.5 Delhaize 22.8 Aldi 7.9 Carrefour 22.2 Plus 6.0 Aldi 11.1 Lidl 5.6 Louis Delhaize 5.4 Jumbo 5.5 Lidl 4.6 Super de Boer (Jumbo) 5.5 Makro 4.5 Other 24.4 Other 2.3 Total 100.0 Total 100.0 Source: Distrifood Retailplanner 2012, StoreCheck FoodGids 2012, FEVIA *Due to Jumbo‘s acquisition of C1000, the latter will gradually disappear and transform into Jumbo The turnover of the Benelux food retail industry is estimated at € 56.3 billion (€33.5 billion in the Netherlands and €22.8 billion in Belgium). For 2012, turnover is expected to increase by 2.5 percent since consumers are expected to spend more food euros at retailers than in the HRI industry. Growth is expected to be found in the full-service supermarkets and convenience stores. Table 2: Turnover Benelux food retail, billion Euros 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 * 47.7 50.5 52,7 54.5 56.3 57.8 Source: CBL, FEDIS, FEVIA * FAS/The Hague forecasts The Benelux food market is highly productive and export focused. In meeting its customers‘ needs it also heavily depends on imports. Last year, the Netherlands imported USD 29.3 billion of consumer-oriented products, about a third came from neighboring Germany and Belgium. After Brazil and South Africa, the U.S. is the third largest non-EU supplier of consumer-oriented products. Over 2011, U.S. exports totaled USD 840 million, dominated by food preparations, tree nuts and beef. In the same year Belgium imported USD 22.2 billion of consumer-oriented products, with 60 percent originating from Germany, France and the Netherlands. U.S. exports of consumer oriented products totaled USD 413 million, led by tree nuts and fruit juices. Table 3: Value of imports of Consumer Oriented and Fishery products, past 5 years, million USD 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Netherlands: Consumer Oriented Products Total imports: 25,033 28,800 25,690 26,462 29,298 Imports from U.S.: 655 732 704 735 840 Fishery Products Total imports: 2,575 2,843 2,646 2,654 3,055 Imports from U.S.: 70 98 92 88 98 Belgium: Consumer Oriented Products Total imports: 19,662 22,043 19,824 19,431 22,244 Imports from U.S.: 270 319 274 287 413 Fishery Products Total imports: 2,046 2,197 1,907 1,945 2,236 Imports from U.S.: 30 27 32 39 54 Source: www.gtis.com For fishery products the Benelux market also depends on imports. Last year, the Netherlands imported USD 3.1 billion of fishery products. Iceland is the largest supplier; the U.S. is the 7th largest non-EU supplier of fishery products. Over 2011, U.S. fish exports totaled 98 million, dominated by frozen fish fillets for further processing, cod, scallops and salmon. In the same year Belgium imported USD 2.2. U.S. fish exports totaled USD 54 million, led by scallops and salmon. Table 4: The number and type of retail outlets in the Netherlands Type of outlet: Number of Stores: Average floor space (M2): Supermarkets 3,545 500 – 1,500 Superstores 30 1,500 – 5,000 Wholesalers 112 >5,000 Convenience Stores 718 <500 Source: Distrifood Retailplanner 2012 Table 5: The number and type of retail outlets in Belgium: Type of outlet: Number of Stores: Average floor space (M2): Supermarkets 2,853 500 – 1,500 Superstores 995 1,500 – 5,000 Wholesalers 410 >5,000 Convenience Stores 1,216 <500 Source: StoreCheck FoodGids 2012 More Sustainable Food Products in the Netherlands During the last decade, especially Dutch retailers have increasingly sourced food products which are either produced sustainably or obtained in a sustainable manner. The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation recently published a report, Monitor Duurzaam Voedsel 2011, which gives an overview of consumer spending on sustainable food in the Netherlands. Sustainable food is one of the most important growth markets in food retail and foodservice markets. The turnover of sustainable food rose in 2011 by 30.5 percent while total spending on food in the same year only grew by 3.1 percent. As a result, the market share of sustainable food increased from 3.5 percent in 2010 to 4.5 percent last year. But how is sustainable food being defined and measured? The MinAg defines as food whereby during production and processing, more than what is legally required, environmental, animal welfare and social aspects or criteria have been taking into account. In the report, two criteria have been used to measure the sustainability claim: 1) at consumer level the sustainability efforts are visible by a label or mark and 2) the control of this mark must be independent. In addition, it is more correct to actually speak of more sustainable food rather than sustainable food in order to indicate that it is a proportionally sustainable product. The emphasis is on the process towards sustainable. Below labels or marks are examples of sustainable food products, recognized by MinAg: Beter Leven: Organic: FAIRTRADE/Ma Label Rouge: MSC: x Havelaar: Milieukeur: Rainforest Scharrelvlees: UTZ Certified: Vrije Uitloop: Alliance: In the Netherlands, spending on sustainable food in 2011 totaled 1.75 billion Euros, up by 410 million Euros compared to 2010. Total spending on food, including sustainable food, amounted 38.9 billion Euros in 2011. Table 6: Spending on sustainable food products, per label/mark, million Euros Label/Mark: 2010: 2011: Change in percentage: Beter Leven 153.6 295.3 92.3 Organic 668.5 802.9 20.1 FAIRTRADE/Max Havelaar 155.9 188.3 20.8 Label Rouge 0.8 1.2 50.0 MSC 111.3 130.5 17.3 Milieukeur 31.4 30.1 -4.1 Rainforest Alliance 98.0 97.8 -0.2 Scharrelvlees 0.2 1.7 750.0 UTZ Certified 214.5 328.0 52.9 Vrije Uitloop 8.0 4.3 -46.3 Total 1,442.2 1,880.1 30.4 Products with more than 1 label or mark 102.3 131.5 28.5 Total 1,339.9 1,748.6 30.5 Source: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation What are the most recent developments per label/mark? Beter Leven: The Beter Leven (or Better Life) is a system by the Dutch Society for the Protection of the Animals (or Dierenbescherming) which is widely accepted in the market. The amount of stars indicates the level of animal welfare friendly, http://beterleven.dierenbescherming.nl/ Organic: On July 1, 2010, the use of the EU organic logo became mandatory for prepackaged organic food produced in the EU. It may be accompanied by national (EKO) or private logos, http://www.eko-keurmerk.nl/. FAIRTRADE/Max Havelaar: This mark continues to demonstrate growth.
Recommended publications
  • Fuel Forecourt Retail Market
    Fuel Forecourt Retail Market Grow non-fuel Are you set to be the mobility offerings — both products and Capitalise on the value-added mobility mega services trends (EVs, AVs and MaaS)1 retailer of tomorrow? Continue to focus on fossil Innovative Our report on Fuel Forecourt Retail Market focusses In light of this, w e have imagined how forecourts w ill fuel in short run, concepts and on the future of forecourt retailing. In the follow ing look like in the future. We believe that the in-city but start to pivot strategic Continuously pages w e delve into how the trends today are petrol stations w hich have a location advantage, w ill tow ards partnerships contemporary evolve shaping forecourt retailing now and tomorrow . We become suited for convenience retailing; urban fuel business start by looking at the current state of the Global forecourts w ould become prominent transport Relentless focus on models Forecourt Retail Market, both in terms of geographic exchanges; and highw ay sites w ill cater to long customer size and the top players dominating this space. distance travellers. How ever the level and speed of Explore Enhance experience Innovation new such transformation w ill vary by economy, as operational Next, w e explore the trends that are re-shaping the for income evolutionary trends in fuel retailing observed in industry; these are centred around the increase in efficiency tomorrow streams developed markets are yet to fully shape-up in importance of the Retail proposition, Adjacent developing ones. Services and Mobility. As you go along, you w ill find examples of how leading organisations are investing Further, as the pace of disruption accelerates, fuel their time and resources, in technology and and forecourt retailers need to reimagine innovative concepts to become more future-ready.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Paris Region Is the #1 Destination on the Planet: with 50 Million Visitors Each Year, the Area Is Synonymous with “Art De Vivre”, Culture, Gastronomy and History
    Saint-Denis Basilicum and Maison de la Légion d’Honneur © Plaine Commune, Direction du Développement Economique, SEPE, Som VOSAVANH-DEPLAGNE - Plain of Montesson © CSAGBS-EDesaux - La Défense Business district © 11h45 for Defacto - Campus © Ecole Polytechnique Paris/Saclay. J. Barande - © Ville d’Enghien-les-Bains - INSEAD Fontainebleau © Yann Piriou - Charenton-le-Pont – Ivry-sur-Seine © ParisEstMarne&Bois - Bassin de La Villette, Paris Plages © CRT Ile-de-France - Tripelon-Jarry Welcome to Paris Region Paris Region Facts and Figures 2020 lays out a panorama of the region’s economic dynamism and social life, Europe’s business positioning it among the leading regions in Europe and worldwide. & innovation With its fundamental key indicators, the brochure “Paris Region Facts and powerhouse Figures 2020” is a tool for decision and action for companies and economic stakeholders. It is useful to economic and political leaders of the region and to all those who want to have a global vision of this dynamic regional economy. Paris Region Facts and Figures 2020 is a collaborative publication produced by Choose Paris Region, L’Institut Paris Region and the Paris Île-de-France Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Jardin_des_tuileries_Tour_Eiffel_01_tvb CRT IDF-Van Biesen Table of contents 5 Welcome to Paris Region 27 Digital Infrastructure 6 Overview 28 Real Estate 10 Population 30 Transport and Mobility 12 Economy and Business 32 Logistics 18 Employment 34 Meetings and Exhibitions 20 Education 36 Tourism and Quality of life 24 R&D and Innovation Paris Region Facts & Figures 2020 Welcome to Paris Region 5 A dynamic and A business fast-growing region and innovation powerhouse Paris Region, The Paris Region is a truly global region which accounts for 23.3% The highest GDP in the European of France’s workforce, 31% of Union (EU28) in billions of euros.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Acquisition by Co-Operative Foodstores Limited of Eight My Local Grocery Stores from ML Convenience Limited and MLCG Limited
    Completed acquisition by Co-operative Foodstores Limited of eight My Local grocery stores from ML Convenience Limited and MLCG Limited Decision on relevant merger situation and substantial lessening of competition ME/6625/16 The CMA’s decision on reference under section 22(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 given on 19 October 2016. Full text of the decision published on 10 November 2016. Please note that [] indicates figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. CONTENTS Page SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 2 ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 3 Parties ................................................................................................................... 3 Transaction ........................................................................................................... 4 Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................ 4 Counterfactual....................................................................................................... 5 Frame of reference ............................................................................................... 7 Competitive assessment ..................................................................................... 11 Third party views ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes of Consumers, Retailers and Producers to Farm Animal Welfare
    Attitudes of Consumers, Retailers and Producers to Farm Animal Welfare edited by Unni Kjærnes, Mara Miele and Joek Roex WELFARE QUALITY REPORTS NO. 2 This report is dedicated to the memory of Jonathan Murdoch. Welfare Quality Reports Edited by Mara Miele and Joek Roex School of City and Regional Planning Cardiff University Glamorgan Building King Edward VII Avenue Cardiff CF10 3WA Wales UK Tel.: +44(0)292087; fax: +44(0)2920874845; e-mail: [email protected] January 2007 The present study is part of the Welfare Quality research project which has been co- financed by the European Commission, within the 6th Framework Programme, contract No. FOOD-CT-2004-506508. The text represents the authors’ views and does not necessarily represent a position of the Commission who will not be liable for the use made of such information. © Copyright is with the authors of the individual contributions. ISBN 1-902647-73-4 ISSN 1749-5164 CONTENTS Preface iii PART I Farm Animal Welfare and Food Consumption Practices: Results from Surveys in Seven Countries (edited by Unni Kjærnes and Randi Lavik) 1 Introduction to Part I 1 2 Background and Research Questions 3 3 Methods 9 4 People Are Interested but Not Necessarily Worried 11 5 Considerations of Animal Friendliness When Purchasing Food 17 6 Availability Is a Bigger Problem Than Price 21 7 The Truth-telling of Institutional Actors 23 8 Concluding Remarks to Part I 29 PART II Analysis of the Retail Survey of Products that Carry Welfare-claims and of Non-retailer Led Assurance Schemes whose Logos Accompany Welfare-claims (edited by Emma Roe and Terry Marsden) 9 Introduction to Part II 33 10 Comparative Overview of Animal Welfare Claims 35 11 Welfare Bundling on Packaging 45 12 Comparative Analysis of Non-retailer Led Schemes of Production 51 13 Comparative Analysis of Marketing Schemes of Non-retailer Led 59 Assurance Schemes 14 Conclusions to Part II 65 PART III Pig Farmers and Animal Welfare: A Study of Beliefs, Attitudes and Behaviour of Pig Producers across Europe (edited by Bettina B.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Top 3 Retailers: Wal-Mart, Carrefour, Tesco Indian Retailers
    4. Case Studies Global Top 3 retailers: Wal-Mart, Carrefour, Tesco Indian Retailers: Future Group (Big Bazar), More, Reliance Fresh,Spencers and Vishal Mega Mart Chapter 4 W a l - M a r t "The secret of successful retailing is to give your customers what they want. And really, if you think about it from your point of view as a customer, you want everything: a wide assortment of good quality merchandise; the lowest possible prices; guaranteed satisfaction with what you buy; friendly, knowledgeable service; convenient hours; free parking; a pleasant shopping experience. ” - Sam Walton, founder of Wal-Mart. ''Exceed your customer’s expectations. If you do they’ll come back over and over. Give them what they want - and a little more. Let them know you appreciate them. - Sam Walton, founder of Wal-Mart Brief about Retailer; In July 1962, Walton - an economics graduate from the University of Missouri, established the first Wal-Mart Discount City in Rogers, a small town in the state of Arkansas, USA. Wal-Mart expanded rapidly by adopting acquisition and joint venture routes. Today Wal-Mart is the world’s number one retailer having operations spread in 14 countries with an employee base of 6, 80,000. Apart from USA, it operates mainly in Canada, South America, UK, Japan, China and India. In 2009, Wal-Mart distributed $423 million for charities in cash and in kind. Wal-Mart environmental friendly goals are: merchandise having 100 percent renewable energy, creation of zero landfill waste and products sell maintaining sustained environment. In India, Wal-Mart has joined hands with Bharati Enterprise and started B2B retail operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars
    Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR) October 2015 Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars Charles S. Mayer Reza M. Bakhshandeh Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Key Words MNE’s, SME’s, Hungary, FMCG Retailing, Cooperatives, Rivalry Abstract In this paper we explore the impact of the ivasion of large global retailers into the Hungarian FMCG space. As well as giving the historical evolution of the market, we also show a recipe on how the local SME’s can cope with the foreign competition. “If you can’t beat them, at least emulate them well.” 1. Introduction Our research started with a casual observation. There seemed to be too many FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) stores in Hungary, compared to the population size, and the purchasing power. What was the reason for this proliferation, and what outcomes could be expected from it? Would the winners necessarily be the MNE’s, and the losers the local SME’S? These were the questions that focused our research for this paper. With the opening of the CEE to the West, large multinational retailers moved quickly into the region. This was particularly true for the extended food retailing sector (FMCG’s). Hungary, being very central, and having had good economic relations with the West in the past, was one of the more attractive markets to enter. We will follow the entry of one such multinational, Delhaize (Match), in detail. At the same time, we will note how two independent local chains, CBA and COOP were able to respond to the threat of the invasion of the multinationals.
    [Show full text]
  • Cesifo Working Paper No. 9137
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Argentesi, Elena; Buccirossi, Paolo; Cervone, Roberto; Duso, Tomaso; Marrazzo, Alessia Working Paper The Effect of Mergers on Variety in Grocery Retailing CESifo Working Paper, No. 9137 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Argentesi, Elena; Buccirossi, Paolo; Cervone, Roberto; Duso, Tomaso; Marrazzo, Alessia (2021) : The Effect of Mergers on Variety in Grocery Retailing, CESifo Working Paper, No. 9137, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/236679 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have
    [Show full text]
  • SPAR International Annual Review 2017 2017 Year at a Glance the 2017 Statistics Show the Continuing Strength and Attractiveness of the SPAR Brand Globally
    SPAR International Annual Review 2017 2017 year at a glance The 2017 statistics show the continuing strength and attractiveness of the SPAR Brand globally. GLOBAL RETAIL 12,777 SALES AREA +5.3% stores globally €34.5 sales billion growth GLOBAL SALES 7.4 MILLION AVERAGE 13.5 STORE SIZE GLOBALLY MILLION 105 CUSTOMERS RETAIL & SERVed PER DAY 48 WHOLESALE countries PARTNERS 581 DISTRIBUTION €4,644 242 CENTRES 232 AVERAGE ANNUAL SALES 350,000 ADDITIONAL GLOBALLY SPAR COLLEAGUES STORES GLOBALLY per m² EMPLOYED “ In 2017, the SPAR worldwide organisation Managing Director’s Report achieved excellent growth of 5.3%. The renaissance in neighbourhood retailing in Europe, further international expansion and tailoring SPAR formats to different markets were all key drivers of this strong performance.” Tobias Wasmuht, Managing Director, SPAR International A YEAR OF enhancing the competitiveness, productivity UNPRECEDENTED and profitability of our retail and wholesale EXPANSION partners worldwide. Reaping the benefits of this shared scale and strength has never With the launch of SPAR in five new countries been more important than it is today. combined with a growth of 232 new stores and a sales increase of 5.3% to €34.5 billion, SPAR’s ability to localise, and take a tailored 2017 has been an unprecedented year of approach to integrate into individual markets, expansion for SPAR internationally. informed by international best practice and working better together, has secured its Our SPAR ‘Better Together’ strategy position as the world’s largest voluntary food launched in 2016, represents SPAR’s core retail chain, with 12,777 stores in 48 countries ethos of uniting together the global scale and global turnover of €34.5 billion at the end and resources of the SPAR network so that of 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade for Development Centre - BTC (Belgian Development Agency)
    Trade for Development Centre - BTC (Belgian Development Agency) 1 Trade for Development Centre - BTC (Belgian Development Agency) Author: Facts Figures Future, http://www.3xf.nl Managing Editor: Carl Michiels © BTC, Belgian Development Agency, 2011. All rights reserved. The content of this publication may be reproduced after permission has been obtained from BTC and provided that the source is acknowledged. This publication of the Trade for Development Centre does not necessarily represent the views of BTC. Photo courtesy: © iStockphoto/Mediaphotos Cover: © CTB Josiane Droeghag 2 Trade for Development Centre - BTC (Belgian Development Agency) ......................................................................................................................................... 3 ............................................................................................................................ 4 .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Consumption .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Imports .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Supplying markets ........................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Exports .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Abuse of Supermarket Buyers
    The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele, SOMO & Bob Young, Europe Economics On behalf of: AAI- Agribusiness Accountability Initiative Amsterdam, March 2009 Colophon The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector Preliminary Survey of Evidence Myriam Vander Stichele (SOMO) & Bob Young (Europe Economics) March 2009 Funding: This publication is made possible with funding from The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs via SOMO and DGOS (Belgian Directorate General for Development Cooperation) via Vredeseilanden (VECO). Published by: AAI - Agribusiness Action Initiatives, formerly called Agribusiness Accountability Initiative The authors can be contacted at: SOMO Sarphatistraat 30 1018 GL Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: + 31 (20) 6391291 Fax: + 31 (20) 6391321 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.somo.nl This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivateWorks 2.5 License. The Abuse of Supermarket Buyer Power in the EU Food Retail Sector 2 Contents Contents ..........................................................................................................................3 Summary .........................................................................................................................4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................6 1. Abusive buyer power problems are being discussed in many fora while a comprehensive
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Retail Mergers on Prices and Variety: an Ex-Post Evaluation Elena Argentesi, Paolo Buccirossi, Roberto Cervone
    No 225 The Effect of Retail Mergers on Prices and Variety: An Ex-post Evaluation Elena Argentesi, Paolo Buccirossi, Roberto Cervone, Tomaso Duso, Alessia Marrazzo June 2016 IMPRINT DICE DISCUSSION PAPER Published by düsseldorf university press (dup) on behalf of Heinrich‐Heine‐Universität Düsseldorf, Faculty of Economics, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany www.dice.hhu.de Editor: Prof. Dr. Hans‐Theo Normann Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE) Phone: +49(0) 211‐81‐15125, e‐mail: [email protected] DICE DISCUSSION PAPER All rights reserved. Düsseldorf, Germany, 2016 ISSN 2190‐9938 (online) – ISBN 978‐3‐86304‐224‐0 The working papers published in the Series constitute work in progress circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comments. Views expressed represent exclusively the authors’ own opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of the editor. The Effect of Retail Mergers on Prices and Variety: An Ex-post Evaluation∗ Elena Argentesi,y Paolo Buccirossi,z Roberto Cervone,z Tomaso Duso,§ Alessia Marrazzo z June 2016 Abstract Unlike most retrospective merger studies that only focus on price effects, we also estimate the impact of a merger on product variety. We use an original dataset on Dutch supermarkets to assess the effect of a merger that was conditionally approved by the Dutch Competition Authority (ACM) on prices and the depth of assortment. We find that the merger did not affect prices but it led the merging parties to decrease the depth of their assortment, thereby reducing consumer choice. This effect is mainly driven by a reduction in variety for stores that were not re-branded after the merger, suggesting that the merging firms reposition their product offerings in order to avoid cannibalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Trader Joe's Vs. Whole Foods Market
    MIT Students Trader Joe’s vs. Whole Foods Market: A Comparison of Operational Management 15.768 Management of Services: Concepts, Design, and Delivery 1 Grocery shopping is more diversified and evolved than ever before. Individuals across the nation have access to everything from exotic products to unique delivery services. Often, specialty stores have limited locations whereas specialty services have a limited reach. However, two retailers have expanded to hundreds of locations while adhering to unexpected market positioning for previously untargeted market segments. Whole Foods Market and Trader Joe’s have become household names while also innovating beyond regional and national traditional chains. Despite comparable size in terms of locations, each store’s growth has operated using a very different model. This document will address the various facets for both Whole Foods Market and Trader Joe’s in order to understand how each business model has won a piece of the market pie and share of wallet. Whole Foods Market Background and History In 1978, John Mackey had a vision to build a store that would meet his desire for whole, natural foods as part of the movement away from artificial, processed foods. Mackey was a college dropout, but against all odds he was able to borrow $45,000 in capital financing and open his first store for what would become Whole Foods in Austin, Texas.1 By all accounts it has been an incredible success and the most recent annual report (2009) reveals that there are 284 stores across most of the United States with a handful in Canada and Great Britain.2 2009 2008 2007 2006 Sales (000s) $8,031,620 $7,953,912 $6,591,773 $5,607,376 1 http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/company/history.php 2 Whole Foods Market Annual Report (2009), pg.
    [Show full text]