The Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipteris

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipteris The Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipteris. BY M. G. SYKES. Girton College, Cambridge; Bathurst Student, Newnkam College, Cambridge. With Plates VII and Vm and thirteen FigureB in the Text. HE material on which the following investigation is based was kindly T sent by Professor Thomas, of Auckland in New Zealand, at the request of Professor Seward ; it comprised two forms, differing only slightly in appearance and structure, but separated by Dangeard 1 as two species: T. tannensis (Fig. I) and T. lanceolata (Fig. II). My thanks are due to Professor Seward, both for liis kindness in obtaining the material for me and for his helpful interest in my work and useful suggestions during its progress. I. HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION. Tmesipteris is found living as an epiphyte on tree-ferns in New Zealand, Australia, and Polynesia.8 Each plant consists of an aerial portion and a rhizome, or subterranean region, but has no roots. In my specimens the aerial part varied from three to eight inches in length. It is very difficult to extricate any but small pieces of the rhizome from the tree-fern roots with which it intertwines.3 I therefore received only small broken posterior portions of the rhizome and short lengths of the anterior region, the latter being attached to the aerial shoots.* Our knowledge of Tmesipteris is based entirely on the adult plant: spores have never been germinated, so nothing is known of the gameto- phyte. It seems probable that the plant has a saprophytic mode of life, and the occurrence of a fungus8 growing in the cortical cells of the rhizome supports this suggestion. ... 1 Dangeard, Le Botaniste, ii, p. 316. ' Baker, Fern Allies, 297-30. 3 Dangeard, Le Botaniste, ii, p. 168. * Jennings and Hall, 1891, PI. I, Fig. 4. 1 Dangeard, Le Botaniste, ii, pp. 233-30, PI. IX, Figs. 15, 16. [Annals of.BoUny, Vol. XXIL No. LXXXV. January, 1908.] Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/os-22/1/63/201535 by Queen Mary University of London user on 24 March 2018 6\ Sykes.—T/ie Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipleris. II. EXTERNAL FEATURES. (x) Vegetative regions. The underground portion of Tmesipteris runs more or less horizontally and forks at intervals. Generally one of the branches thus formed remains small, while the other continues as the main axis. Rhizome apices were very rare in my material; they are easily distinguished by their smoothness, while the rest of the rhizome is covered FIGURE I. 7*. ianntnsis. FIGURE II. T. laiucolata (f nat. tize). with soft hairs. One apex was divided into three lobes, but investigation of the vascular structure revealed no branching of the stele, and I can offer no explanation of this unusual case. In every specimen examined the anterior end of the rhizome is directly transformed into a single aerial shoot, but Dangeard describes plants Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/os-22/1/63/201535 by Queen Mary University of London user on 24 March 2018 Sykes.— The Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipteris. 65 in which several aerial stems arose from one rhizome.1 Usually the winding, hairy, and irregular rhizome passes by a more or less straight and glabrous transition region into the upright stem. The surface of the upper part of the transition region becomes gradually ridged owing to the fact that the leaf, bases are decurrent. At this stage a number of small scale- leaves, varying from two to six, according to the size of the plant, and reminding one of the leaves of Psilotum, are given off. Every transition is found between these and normal leaves. The latter in T. tannensis are from a half to three-quarters of an inch long, while in T. lanceolata they may reach one and a quarter inches in length. In the former species the largest leaves are found about half way up the stem, and decrease in size again towards the apex of the plant. Each leaf is sessile and ovate— lanceolate, has a mucronate tip, and is adnate to the stem by its base and part of one side. In T. lanceolata the largest leaves are found lower down on the stem than in T. tannensis; they have no mucronate tip, but taper gradually to a point, and they are lanceolate in shape. It is doubtful whether these two kinds of leaves are sufficiently distinct to warrant in themselves the distinction of the forms bearing them as two species; especially as in some cases2 both kinds have been found on the same plant. There appears to be no other important difference between the so-called species. The leaves are arranged spirally in two to five irregular rows, and are vertically placed, like the phyllodes of Acacia. (a) Fertile region. In T. tannensis the first branches are formed at the region of maximum development of the leaves, in T. lanceolata rather above this region. There may be a leaf here and there among the branches, but generally the purely foliar regions of the stem are sharply marked off from the branch-bearing regions, somewhat in the same manner as was noted by Bower in Lycopodium Selago? In several cases these regions were found to alternate, six to eight sterile leaves being placed between two fertile regions. No sterile branches such as those described by Bertrand4 and Dangeard 8 were borne on my specimens, but every branch was fertile and generally bore two leaves and a bisporangiate synangium. In some plants growth had stopped, and in these cases the main axis ended in a fertile branch or sporophyll, bearing as usual two leaves and a synangium. Presumably the apex is here employed in the formation of the terminal synangium. In one case the last organ borne by the mature plant was a leaf. Other specimens were still growing at the time 1 Dangeaid, Le Bot., li, p. 168. 3 Vanghan JenniDgs and Hall, 1891. * Bower, 1894, p. 353. * Bertrand, Figs. 203, 243-6. » Dangeard, Le Bot., ii,.p. 181, PI. XII, Fig. 5, and PL XIV, Fig. 8. F Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/os-22/1/63/201535 by Queen Mary University of London user on 24 March 2018 66 Sykes.— The Anatomy and Morphology of Tmesipleris. of preservation, and all these bore at their apex numerous fertile branches in all stages of development (Text-fig. II, p. 64). Such plants do not appear to have been among Bertrand's or Dangeard's material, but are figured by Jennings.1 Each ' sporophyll' consists of a short axis at the apex of which two leaves and a synangium are situated. The synangium is borne on a short pedicel or sporangiophore, which may, however, in unusual cases become much elongated, and even attain a considerable length-2 The leaves are exactly similar to those on the main axis. The synangia are generally bisporangiate, consisting of two lobes, each dehiscing longitudinally, and separated from each other by a plate of sterile tissue. A few abnormal fertile branches are described below. III. SHORT SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK ON TMESIPTERIS. The most exhaustive account of Tmesipteris is found in Bertrand's monograph3, which deals very fully with both the anatomy and the morphology. Dangeard4 has given a more concise description of the genus, of which he recognizes several species, differing chiefly in the shape of their leaves and synangia. This author was the first to investigate the rhizome, and he studied to some extent the fungus5 found in its cells, and considered by him to be a member of the Chytridiaceae. Jennings and Hall6 have described the anatomy of Tmesipteris, but few new facts are to be gleaned from their account. The results of the above authors may be shortly summarized as follows: Tmesipteris is a rootless plant,' the underground portion absorbing moisture by means of rhizoids, containing a fungus and having a single concentric stele, which has usually two exarch protoxylem groups. In no case has an endodermis been seen either in the rhizome or in the aerial stem, and the minute structure of the phloem is as yet uninvestigated. The aerial portion of the plant bears leaves and sterile and fertile branches. The branches each bear a pair of leaves, and in the case of the fertile branches each has also a two-lobed spore-producing organ, formed on the end of a short pedicel arising at the point of divergence of the two leaves. The aerial stem also is monostelic, but here the phloem forms a continuous ring, while the xylem is arranged in several mesarch groups. Bertrand states that the leaves and branches each receive a single trace with a single protoxylem group, but Dangeard describes the formation of diarch steles to supply the branches. Each leaf-trace arises from one of the xylem groups of the stem by division at or near the place of origin, but each 1 Jennings and Hall, 1891, PI. I, Fig. II. ' Thomas, 1902, p. 343. * Bertrand, Recherches sur 1M Te'mripte'rid^es. 1 DflDgeard, Le Botanisle, ii, pp. 163-319, PI. IX-XV. ' Dangeard, Le Botaniste, ii, p. 222-30. * Jennings and Hall, 1891. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/os-22/1/63/201535 by Queen Mary University of London user on 24 March 2018 Sykes.—The Anatomy and Morphology of Ttnesipteris. 67 branch trace is formed by the passing out of a whole group from the stem, its place being subsequently taken in the stem by. a group formed by division from one of the others. The various authors agree that in each fertile branch three bundles are finally found, one of which supplies the spore-producing organ, while the other two form the traces of the two leaves.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Ophioglossidae (PDF, 873
    Ophioglossidae 1 Polypodiopsida Ophioglossidae – Gabelblattgewächse (Polypodiopsida) Zu den Ophioglossidae werden 2 rezente Ordnungen gestellt, die Psilotales (Gabelfarne) und die Ophioglossales (Natternzungenartigen). Die Ophioglossidae sind eine sehr alte Landpflanzengruppe. Die Blätter sind, anders als dies für viele makrophylle Farnpflanzen typisch ist, zu Beginn nicht eingerollt. Ein gemeinsames Merkmal der Psilotales mit den Ophioglossales sind eusporangiate Sporangien, d. h. die Sporangienwand weist mehrere Zellschichten auf (Unterschied lepto- sporangiate Farne, hier einschichtig). Bei einigen Arten der Psilotales fehlt eine echte Wurzel. Alle Arten sind mykotroph (Ernährung mittels Pilzsymbiose im Boden, Mykorrhiza). 1. Ordnung: Psilotales (Gabelfarne) 1.1 Systematik und Verbreitung Die Ordnung der Psilotales enthält nur 1 Familie, die Psilotaceae mit nur 2 Gattungen und 17 Arten (Psilotum 2 und Tmesipteris 15 Arten). Die Familie ist überwiegend tropisch verbreitet. 1.2 Morphologie 1.2.1 Habitus Die Arten der Psilotales sind ausschließlich krautige Pflanzen mit einem kräftigen, unterirdischen Kriechspross (Rhizom), das zahlreiche Rhizoide ausbildet. Echte Wurzeln fehlen. Die vollständige Reduktion der Wurzel wird hier als sekundäres, abgeleitetes Merkmal angesehen. Wie der Gametophyt ist auch der Sporophyt mykotroph, was erst die morphologische Reduktion der Wurzel erlaubte. Die oberirdischen sparrig dichotom verzweigten Sprossachsen weisen eine (angedeutete) Siphonostele mit einem holzigen Mark auf. Die unterirdischen Rhizome haben hingegen eine Protostele. 1.2.2 Blatt Arten aus den Psilotales haben ausschließlich schraubig angeordnete Mikrophylle. Bei Psilotum sind nur die Sporophylle Gabelblätter (im Unterschied zu den sterilen © PD DR. VEIT M. DÖRKEN, Universität Konstanz, FB Biologie Ophioglossidae 2 Polypodiopsida Blättern). Die Photosynthese erfolgt daher hauptsächlich über die chlorophyllreichen Sprossachsen (Rutenstrauch-Prinzip). Abb. 1 & 2: Psilotum nudum, dichotom verzweigte Sprossachse (links); Querschnitt einer Sprossachse (rechts).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks and Wildlife Amendment (Protected Native Plants) Order 2009 Under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
    2009 No 138 New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Amendment (Protected Native Plants) Order 2009 under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 MARIE BASHIR, Governor I, Professor Marie Bashir AC, CVO, Governor of the State of New South Wales, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of section 115 (2) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, make the following Order. Dated, this 8th day of April 2009. By Her Excellency’s Command, CARMEL TEBBUTT, M.P., Minister for Climate Change and the Environment Explanatory note The object of this Order is to substitute Schedule 13 to the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (the Act) (the Schedule that classifies certain plants as protected native plants). The consequences of a plant being classified as a protected native plant are: (a) section 115A of the Act provides for the preparation of plans of management for any commercial activity relating to a species or group of species of protected native plant if the Director-General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change is of the opinion that the activity has the potential to affect adversely the conservation of the species or group, and (b) section 116 of the Act prevents the issue of licences under the Forestry Act 1916 for the removal of protected native plants from any State forest, timber reserve or Crown land, and (c) section 117 of the Act restricts the picking or possession of protected native plants, and (d) section 118 of the Act restricts the selling of protected native plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Tmesipteris Tannensis
    Tmesipteris tannensis COMMON NAME Fork Fern SYNONYMS Lycopodium tannense Spreng.; Tmesipteris fowerakeri H.N.Barber, Tmesipteris forsteri sensu A.Cunn. nom. inv., FAMILY Psilotaceae AUTHORITY Tmesipteris tannensis (Spreng.) Bernh. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes Tararua Forest Park. June 2005. Photographer: ENDEMIC GENUS Jeremy Rolfe No ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Ferns NVS CODE TMETAN CHROMOSOME NUMBER Tararua Forest Park. June 2005. Photographer: 2n = 208 Jeremy Rolfe CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | Not Threatened PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Not Threatened 2004 | Not Threatened DISTRIBUTION Endemic. New Zealand, North, South, Stewart, Chatham and Auckland Islands. HABITAT Coastal to subalpine.Terrestrial or epiphytic on a wide range of hosts and often sympatric with Tmesipteris elongata (less frequently with T. lanceolata and T. sigmatifolia). Less common in coastal and lowland areas in the far north where it is mostly known from higher altitude forest. However, steadily becoming more common from about Whangarei south. FEATURES Rhizome: dichotomously branched, brittle, 2.0-3.5 mm diameter. Aerial shoot: developing over one to many years, but eventually terminating in a small appendage 0.1-0.5× the length of the largest leaves, simple, erect, suberect, or pendulous, 50-1200 mm long, triangular in cross-section, leaves and sporophylls spirally arranged. Leaves coriaceous, brittle, one surface deep glossy green, occasionally with a few stomata towards the far end, other surface dull green covered with stomata; shape variable often on same shoot, oblong, lanceolate, falcate, or ovate, 6-30 mm long × 2.5-9.0 mm broad; apex of leaf very variable often on the same plant, acute, obtuse to truncate, mucronate; mucro 1-2 mm long.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Fern Chloroplasts and Decelerated Evolution Linked to the Long Generation Time in Tree Ferns
    GBE Two New Fern Chloroplasts and Decelerated Evolution Linked to the Long Generation Time in Tree Ferns Bojian Zhong1,*, Richard Fong1,LesleyJ.Collins2, Patricia A. McLenachan1, and David Penny1 1Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Universal College of Learning, Palmerston North, New Zealand *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: April 23, 2014 Data deposition: The two new chloroplast genomes (Dicksonia and Tmesipteris) have been deposited at GenBank under accessions KJ569698 and KJ569699, respectively. Abstract We report the chloroplast genomes of a tree fern (Dicksonia squarrosa) and a “fern ally” (Tmesipteris elongata), and show that the phylogeny of early land plants is basically as expected, and the estimates of divergence time are largely unaffected after removing the fastest evolving sites. The tree fern shows the major reduction in the rate of evolution, and there has been a major slowdown in the rate of mutation in both families of tree ferns. We suggest that this is related to a generation time effect; if there is a long time period between generations, then this is probably incompatible with a high mutation rate because otherwise nearly every propagule would probably have several lethal mutations. This effect will be especially strong in organisms that have large numbers of cell divisions between generations. This shows the necessity of going beyond phylogeny and integrating its study with other properties of organisms. Key words: Tmesipteris, Dicksonia, ferns and fern allies, chloroplast genomes, generation time effect, mutation rates. Introduction problematic. Tmesipteris was to help test the possibility that We address three main types of questions in this study: The themorewidespreadPsilotum was misplaced because of phylogeny of early land plants, the decelerated evolutionary “long branch attraction” artifact (Hendy and Penny 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Ferns, Cycads, Conifers and Vascular Plants
    Flora of Australia Glossary — Ferns, Cycads, Conifers and Vascular plants A main glossary for the Flora of Australia was published in Volume 1 of both printed editions (1981 and 1999). Other volumes contain supplementary glossaries, with specific terms needed for particular families. This electronic glossary is a synthesis of all hard-copy Flora of Australia glossaries and supplementary glossaries published to date. The first Flora of Australia glossary was compiled by Alison McCusker. Mary D. Tindale compiled most of the fern definitions, and the conifer definitions were provided by Ken D. Hill. Russell L. Barrett combined all of these to create the glossary presented here, incorporating additional terms from the printed version of Volume 37. This electronic glossary contains terms used in all volumes, but with particular reference to the flowering plants (Volumes 2–50). This glossary will be updated as future volumes are published. It is the standard to be used by authors compiling future taxon treatments for the Flora of Australia. It also comprises the terms used in Species Plantarum — Flora of the World. Alternative terms For some preferred terms (in bold), alternative terms are also highlighted (in parentheses). For example, apiculum is the preferred term, and (=apiculus) is an alternative. Preferred terms are those also used in Species Plantarum — Flora of the World. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2017. Flora of Australia Glossary — Ferns, Cycads, Conifers and Vascular plants is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 23: the Early Tracheophytes
    Chapter 23 The Early Tracheophytes THE LYCOPHYTES Lycopodium Has a Homosporous Life Cycle Selaginella Has a Heterosporous Life Cycle Heterospory Allows for Greater Parental Investment Isoetes May Be the Only Living Member of the Lepidodendrid Group THE MONILOPHYTES Whisk Ferns Ophioglossalean Ferns Horsetails Marattialean Ferns True Ferns True Fern Sporophytes Typically Have Underground Stems Sexual Reproduction Usually Is Homosporous Fern Have a Variety of Alternative Means of Reproduction Ferns Have Ecological and Economic Importance SUMMARY PLANTS, PEOPLE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT: Sporophyte Prominence and Survival on Land PLANTS, PEOPLE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT: Coal, Smog, and Forest Decline THE OCCUPATION OF THE LAND PLANTS, PEOPLE, AND THE The First Tracheophytes Were ENVIRONMENT: Diversity Among the Ferns Rhyniophytes Tracheophytes Became Increasingly Better PLANTS, PEOPLE, AND THE Adapted to the Terrestrial Environment ENVIRONMENT: Fern Spores Relationships among Early Tracheophytes 1 KEY CONCEPTS 1. Tracheophytes, also called vascular plants, possess lignified water-conducting tissue (xylem). Approximately 14,000 species of tracheophytes reproduce by releasing spores and do not make seeds. These are sometimes called seedless vascular plants. Tracheophytes differ from bryophytes in possessing branched sporophytes that are dominant in the life cycle. These sporophytes are more tolerant of life on dry land than those of bryophytes because water movement is controlled by strongly lignified vascular tissue, stomata, and an extensive cuticle. The gametophytes, however still require a seasonally wet habitat, and water outside the plant is essential for the movement of sperm from antheridia to archegonia. 2. The rhyniophytes were the first tracheophytes. They consisted of dichotomously branching axes, lacking roots and leaves. They are all extinct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomic Position of the Psilotales in the Light of Our Knowledge of Devonian Plant Life*
    THE TAXONOMIC POSITION OF THE PSILOTALES IN THE LIGHT OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF DEVONIAN PLANT LIFE* F. P. JONKER Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht, The Netherlands ABSTRACT exclusively Devonian Psilophytales and of the latter the Rhyniaceae are regarded The order Psilotales, containing the two recent genera Psilatum and Tnzesiptel'is only, is usually usually as the closest relatives. Among classified by taxonomists and palaeo botanists those who take this st?nd I mention G. M. in the phylum Psiiophyta. This concept is, Smith (1955), Magdefra.u in Strasburger in spite of the synangia, based on the primitive (1971) and Lcmoigne (1968c). The concept general appearance reminding one of that of the of the last mentioned author will be dis• Devonian Rhyniaceae. Numerous attempts have been made to derive both genera, including their cussed further on. Darrah (1960) states synangia, from either the Rhvniaceae or from other that the status of the putative primitive Psilophyta. These attempts' sometimes led to the nature of the plant body in the Psilotaceae acceptance of a series of missing Jinks but this concept is, however, not supported bv palaeo· is controversial although there is a strong botanical data. tendency to accept the family as a pel'sis• In the opinion of the present reporter the order tent remnant of the Psilopsida. Andrews has kept a primitive general appearance of its (1961) states that Psilatum has been reaarded Devonian ancestors but in its synangia and in its monolete spores it is more advanced. by some botanists as a very simpl~ land In its anatomy, its microphyllous leaves, and in its plant, possibly a very ancient type that gametophyte perhaps, it shows more affiinity to the has managed to survive for several hundreds phylum Lycopodiophyta.
    [Show full text]
  • Pteridophyte Fungal Associations: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives
    This is a repository copy of Pteridophyte fungal associations: Current knowledge and future perspectives. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/109975/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Pressel, S, Bidartondo, MI, Field, KJ orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-2360 et al. (2 more authors) (2016) Pteridophyte fungal associations: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 54 (6). pp. 666-678. ISSN 1674-4918 https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12227 © 2016 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Pressel, S., Bidartondo, M. I., Field, K. J., Rimington, W. R. and Duckett, J. G. (2016), Pteridophyte fungal associations: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Jnl of Sytematics Evolution, 54: 666–678., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12227. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of South Australia 5Th Edition | Edited by Jürgen Kellermann
    Flora of South Australia 5th Edition | Edited by Jürgen Kellermann KEY TO FAMILIES1 J.P. Jessop2 The sequence of families used in this Flora follows closely the one adopted by the Australian Plant Census (www.anbg.gov. au/chah/apc), which in turn is based on that of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG III 2009) and Mabberley’s Plant Book (Mabberley 2008). It differs from previous editions of the Flora, which were mainly based on the classification system of Engler & Gilg (1919). A list of all families recognised in this Flora is printed in the inside cover pages with families already published highlighted in bold. The up-take of this new system by the State Herbarium of South Australia is still in progress and the S.A. Census database (www.flora.sa.gov.au/census.shtml) still uses the old classification of families. The Australian Plant Census web-site presents comparison tables of the old and new systems on family and genus level. A good overview of all families can be found in Heywood et al. (2007) and Stevens (2001–), although these authors accept a slightly different family classification. A number of names with which people using this key may be familiar but are not employed in the system used in this work have been included for convenience and are enclosed on quotation marks. 1. Plants reproducing by spores and not producing flowers (“Ferns and lycopods”) 2. Aerial shoots either dichotomously branched, with scale leaves and 3-lobed sporophores or plants with fronds consisting of a simple or divided sterile blade and a simple or branched spikelike sporophore ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fern Gazette
    THE FERN GAZETTE INDEX VOLUME13 The Parts of Fern Gazette Volume 13 were published on the following dates and comprised the following pages: Date of Pages publication Part 1 29 August 1985 1-64 Part2 29 Se tember 1986 65-128 Part3 28 Ju hy 1987 129-192 Part4 15 October 1988 193-256 PartS 22 November 1989 257-320 Part 6 18 June 1990 321-360 Part 7 26 October 1990 361 - 396 Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr Nan Raybould who did a wonderful job in preparing this manuscript. Final camera ready copy was produced by Dr Mary Gib by. 2 FERN GAZETfE-INDEX VOLUME 13 Acroph01us Anhropteris stipellatus 28,32 monocarpa 296,304,312 Acrostichum Aspidotis a/pestre 110 schimperi 308 aureum 97-102 Asp/enidictyum 53,54 danaeifo/ium 97-102 Asplenium speciosum 97 adiantum-nigrum 322,349, 391-394 Actiniopteris 314 aegeum 154, 163 dim01pha 307 aethiopicum 104,105,219,222 radiata 306 223,296,304 ADAMS,C.D. 266,276 aitchisonii 163 Adiantum 314 x a/temifolium 357 capillus-veneris 57,104,105,322 anceps 287,393 caudatum 28,31 anisophyllum 304 digitatum 219,222,223 xananense 349-355 edgewonhii 31 aureum 61 fi/iforme 110 x barrancense 133 incisum 309 birii 61 philippense 28,30,31,309 b/astophornm 104, 105 poiretii 219,222,223,309 boltonii 104, 105, 302, 312, raddianum 308 313 reniforme 342 bourgaei 154, 163,167 sinuosum 110 buettneri 308 subvolubile 219,221,222,223 bulbifernm 78,80,81,84 venustum 30,31 capense 58,61,62 Amauropelta castaneo-viride 59 bergiana 306,315 ce/tibericum 151-156 Amphineuron ceterach opulentum 104,107 ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification, Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Time, And
    The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for Plant Systematics ISSN 1346-7565 Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 56 (2): 111-126 (2005) Invited article and Classification,MolecularPhylogeny,DivergenceTime, Morphological Evolution of Pteridophytes with Notes on Heterospory and and Monophyletic ParaphyleticGroups MASAHIRO KATO* Department ofBiotogicat Sciences,Graduate Schoot ofScience,Universitv. of7bkyo, Hongo, 7bk)]o IJ3- O033, lapan Pteridophytes are free-sporing vascular land plants that evolutionarily link bryophytes and seed plants. Conventiona], group (taxon)-based hierarchic classifications ofptcridophytes using phenetic characters are briefiy reviewcd. Review is also made for recent trcc-based cladistic analyses and molecular phy- logenetic analyses with increasingly large data sets ofmultiplc genes (compared to single genes in pre- vious studies) and increasingly large numbers of spccies representing major groups of pteridophytes (compared to particular groups in previous studies), and it is cxtended to most recent analyses of esti- mating divergcnce times ofpteridephytes, These c]assifications, phylogenetics, and divergcncc time esti- mates have improved our understanding of the diversity and historical structure of pteridophytes. Heterospory is noted with referencc to its origins, endospory, fertilization, and dispersal. Finally, menophylctic and paraphyletic groups rccently proposed or re-recognized are briefly dcscribcd. Key words: classification, divergence timc estimate. fems,heterospory, molecular phylogcny, pteri- dophytcs. Morphological
    [Show full text]