Strengthening Public Sector Institutions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strengthening Public Sector Institutions AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUND SECOND COMMUNITY AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND COMPETITIVENESS PROJECT COMPONENT 2: STRENGTHENING PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN CONSTRUCTION OF VETERINARY SERVICE CENTRE IN HRAZDAN COMMUNITY OF THE RA KOTAYK MARZ A. GENERAL PROJECT AND SITE INFORMATION INSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE Country Republic of Armenia Second Community Agricultural Resource Management and Name of the Project Competitiveness Second Project (CARMAC II) Construction of veterinary service center in Kotayk marz, Subproject Title Hrazdan community Institutional Task Team Leader Safeguard Specialists Arrangements (co-TTL if applicable) (env., soc.) (Name and contacts) Bekzod Shamsiev Darejan Kapanadze Arusyak Alaverdyan Sophia Georgieva Institutional/implementation Implementing entity Safeguards Works provider arrangements supervisor (World Bank) Agriculture Development (if external to (to be selected) Fund Implementing Entity) N/A SITE DESCRIPTION Name of the institution whose The Hrazdan Veterinary Service Center (VSC) will be owned premises are to be by the Ministry of Agriculture. The Operator of the Hrazdan construction/rehabilitated VSC will be defined at a later stage. Address/location of premises RA Kotyak marz, Hrazdan town, Southern district, Hrazdan- to be constructed/rehabilitated Lernanist Highway, number 15 land plot Project description/scope of The veterinary service center (VSC) will provide services not activity only to Hrazdan community, but also its nearby communities, particularly: Solak, Kaghsi, Lernansit, Artavaz, Hankavan, Jrarat, Aghavnadzor, Meghradzor, Tsaghkadzor, Kakavadzor; Several Sevan region communities, such as Zovaber, Ddmashen, Gagarin and Tsaghkunk, are also potential beneficiaries of the VSC. It will provide veterinary services, counseling, and serve as a point of sale of medications, as well as a training facility. The Center is located in such an area of the town, where the livestock market is organized, due to which more people will be informed about the Center and there will be greater number of beneficiaries. Total area of the structure (storage and one floor building) will comprise 400 m2, and will include a meeting room/demonstration room with the area of 22,8 m2, a corridor, three working rooms, of which one with the area of 22, 8 m2, and another two with the area of 13,6 m2, a kitchen – 7,80 m2, a storage room 28,8 m2, bathroom/toilet – 2,40 m2 and a balcony – 12,8 m2. The following construction activities will be implemented under the proposed sub-project: Establishment of the construction site and mobilization of construction works Community Agricultural Resource Management and Competitiveness Project II Environmental and Social Management Plan 2 Earth works / excavation, backfilling, leveling Construction works foundation, external walls, internal partition, concrete floors installation of steel doors and windows installation of steel roof Internal renovation works Internal and external water supply and sanitation Internal and external water supply facility installation Installation of 1 septic chamber, internal and external power facility construction, solar water heating system installation Landscaping and final restoration of construction site Fencing with metallic fence and illumination of FSC territory The works also include arrangements for water and electricity supply. For connection to the municipal water supply system, an agreement with technical conditions has been obtained from Veolia Djur. The municipal sewerage system does not exist in the area. The flash toilet with 1 concrete septic chamber (length – 2.80 cm width – 1.90 cm, bottom depth - 20 cm) will be constructed inside of VSC building. Septic chamber will be regularly cleaned by cesspool truck during construction as well as during operation of the VSC based on an agreement to be concluded with Veolia Djur. The building will be heated with electric heaters. The design for construction of the VSC in Hrazdan community of the RA Kotayk marz was developed by the Kve Nakhagits LLC under the contract dated on 10.10.2017 (Hrazdan VSC Design) concluded with AADF. Project site location The site allocated for the construction fo VSC premises is located within the administrative area of Hrazdan community of the RA Kotayk marz, at a distance of about 40 km from the city of Yerevan. The site is at the altitude of 1750 under the sea level. The relief of the area has elevation variations of 1,8 m. The building will be located at the edge of Hrazdan-Lernanist road, leaving some free area (9 m) in front of the building. The construction is planned to be located in the eastern part of the land plot, and the rest of the area that is not used under construction will be improved and landscaped. The site is mainly surrounded by agricultural lands. There are some semi-build constructions not close to it, and the nearest private house is at about 100 m distance from the construction area. As the construction site is located at about 9 m distance from the edge of the Hrazdan-Lernanist road, which is among other things, is not a very busy road, the construction works will not impede the traffic on the road, therefore no closure of and/or Community Agricultural Resource Management and Competitiveness Project II Environmental and Social Management Plan 3 restriction of traffic on the road can occur due, as well as no need to provide alternative routes. Considering that there are no private houses close to the construction area, during construction works, there is a very minimal risk, if any, of disturbance to local residents (even temporary) related to noise and dust, as well as no restriction of access to any building/land is expected. No tree removal is expected. The natural relief and landscape will be recovered after construction works. As for water pipelines passing through 0.02 ha community lands, no private lands or lands used by illegal users will be used for the purpose also. Overall duration of construction works is estimated to be four months, and one month will be required for preparatory works prior to construction. Land title and user right The site allocated for the construction of VSC building, 0.4 ha holder(s) public construction lands, belongs to the Ministry of Agriculture (donated by the Hrazdan Community to the RA Ministry of Agriculture according to the RA Government Decree № 564-A of April 26, 2018). In addition to the abovementioned land used for the VSC, water pipelines will pass through 0.02 ha of community lands. No private lands or lands used by illegal users will be used. This was checked and verified via the community cadastral map and field surveys. The Land Ownership Rights Certificate of the RA Ministry of Agriculture (Certificate No26062018-07-0040, dated June 26.2018), is attached. Description of geographic, Project area is located in the Kotayk marz of Armenia in the physical, biological, geological, administrative area of Hrazdan community. The Hrazdan hydrographic and socio- River flows through the city, Marmarik and Aghveran rivers economic context are flow into the Hrazdan. The average annual air temperature is 5.5-60 ° C. The annual precipitation is 715-730 mm. Natural landscape is dry mountainous. Hrazdan town is the marz center of Kotayk marz, which is divided into three regions: Nairi, Kotayk and Hrazdan. Hrazdan town is situated in North-Eastern part of Armenia. Its administrative area is 15,343 ha and the population is 59502 of whom 33124 men and 26378 women, overall 3500 households. 11.6 % of the overall population of the Republic involved in the migration processes is from Kotayk marz. Of the overall population of the Republic not returning and returning to the Republic, Kotayk marz population is 7,9% and 17.2% respectively. Poverty rate of Kotayk marz is 10.5 % within the overall poverty rate of the Republic. In Hrazdan town there are 2145 families in the family benefit system, 12307 pensioners and persons with disability. In the past, the town was developed industrial centre. Now the Community Agricultural Resource Management and Competitiveness Project II Environmental and Social Management Plan 4 major part of industrial enterpizes is not functioning. There are about 24 enterprises functioning in the community, and also entities engaged in bakery production. The activity sectors are energy, cement, semiconductors, radio technical equipment, clothes, knitted goods, bread, bakery. In Kotayk marz, there are 27845 heads of cattle, of which 11587 are cows, and 21003 are sheep and goats. Also, there are 9267 pigs, 77630 poultry, 283 horses and 11222 hives of bees. Overall there are 46 veterinarians operating in the Marz, who provide services to 70 communities. In the marz, there are also a number of large livestock complexes that are provided services by the hired specialists. Besides, there are a number of big villages, the headcount of livestock of which is so big, that it is serviced by more than one specialist. On the other hand, there are small villages, mainly in Hrazdan region, which are provided services by one specialist only. Almost in the center of the Hrazdan town, there is the Sevan- Hrazdan cascade and an important water-reservoir, regulating water supply of the whole system. Yerevan-Sevan interstate highway, Yerevan-Tsaghkadzor and Yerevan-Hankavan roads pass along the Northern part of the town. Infrastructure rehabilitation and development are the main areas of development of Hrazdan town as per the Community Development Program for 2017-2021. Locations and distance for Water for construction works will be provided by water cistern material sourcing, especially track. External toilet facilities/septic chamber during aggregates, water, stones construction works will be temporarily installed by the Contractor or will be used facility, located in nearby houses. Aggregates and machinery will be obtained from the licensed providers within the project area. Contractor may choose to extract equipment himself, in which case contractor must obtain an extraction license prior to commencement of extraction. Metallic and PE pipes for water supply will be purchased from an official supplier.
Recommended publications
  • Tourism Development Trends in Armenia
    Tourism Education Studies and Practice, 2018, 5(1) Copyright © 2018 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. Published in the Slovak Republic Tourism Education Studies and Practice Has been issued since 2014. E-ISSN: 2409-2436 2018, 5(1): 20-25 DOI: 10.13187/tesp.2018.1.20 www.ejournal10.com Tourism Development Trends in Armenia Gayane Tovmasyan а , * Rubik Tovmasyan b a ''AMBERD'' Research Center of the Armenian State University of Economics, Armenia b Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia, Armenia Abstract In recent years tourism develops rapidly in Armenia. The main tourism statistics, tourism competitiveness index are presented and analyzed in the article. The article discusses the main types of tourism that may be developed in Armenia such as religious, historical-cultural, spa-resort, eco- and agri-, sport and adventure, gastronomic, urban, educational, scientific, medical tourism. Although the growth of tourism in recent years, there are still many problems that hinder the promotion of tourism. The tourism statistics, marketing policy, legislation must be improved. Besides, the educational system must meet the requirements of the labor market. Tourist specialists must have all the skills for tourism industry development. Thus, the main problems are revealed and the trends and ways of tourism development are analyzed in the article. Keywords: tourism, competitiveness, types of tourism, marketing, statistics, GDP, tourism development trends. 1. Introduction Tourism is one of the largest industries all over the world and develops very fast. Year by year more and more people travel to visit friends and relatives, to have leisure time, or with the purpose of business travel, education, health recovery, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 Initial Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council Of
    Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Initial Periodical Report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter ARMENIA The First Report of the Republic of Armenia According to Paragraph 1 of Article 15 of European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages June 2003, Yerevan 2 INTRODUCTION The Republic of Armenia signed the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages on May 11, 2001. In respect of Armenia the Charter has come into force since May 1, 2002. The RA introduces the following report according to Paragraph 1 of Article 15 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. This report has been elaborated and developed by the State Language Board at the Ministry of Education and Science based on the information submitted by the relevant ministries NGOs and administrative offices, taking into consideration the remarks and suggestions made by them and all parties interested, while discussing the following report. PART I Historical Outline Being one of the oldest countries in the world, for the first time in its new history Armenia regained its independence on May 28, 1918. The first Republic existed till November 29, 1920, when Armenia after forced sovetalization joined the Soviet Union, becoming on of the 15 republics. As a result of referendum the Republic of Armenia revived its independence on September 21, 1991. Armenia covers an area of 29,8 thousand km2, the population is nearly 32000001. Armenia borders on Iran, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • American University of Armenia Energy Security Of
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA ENERGY SECURITY OF ARMENIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY NATALYA SHAKARYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA JUNE 2012 SIGNATURE PAGE ______________________________________________________________________________ Faculty Advisor Date ______________________________________________________________________________ Dean Date American University of Armenia June 2012 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my Faculty Advisor Dr. Vahram Ter- Matevosyan for his invaluable advice and help, which have greatly supported the conduction of this research. Special thanks to Dr. Vahram Ter-Matevosyan for his continuous encouragement and regular consultancy. I would like to express my special acknowledgement to Dr. Douglas H. Shumavon, the dean of the Graduate School of Political Science and International Affairs. His immense support during the last year of my study at the American University of Armenia enabled me to overcome many obstacles, as well as gain deeper knowledge of the field. My thankfulness also goes to all the members of the Faculty of the School of Political Science and International Affairs for their assistance and feedback in the development of both theoretical knowledge and analytical skills. 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a River Basin Management Plan for Hrazdan River Basin
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Results 2 & 3 DEVELOPMENT OF A RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HRAZDAN RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES Version 1, 28 September 2020 APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF THE HRAZDAN BASIN PUBLIC CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES EUWI+ PROJECT: "COMMUNICATION ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION PLAN FOR PARTICIPATIVE RBM PLANNING IN ARMENIA" Within the framework of the European Union Water Initiative Plus (EUWI+) programme, the process of developing Hrazdan and Sevan basin management plans started in 2018. The process of public discussion and consultation of the Hrazdan Basin Management Plan took place from 20 June to 20 August 2020. The Water Basin Management Plan is a guidance document developed as a result of collaboration between different stakeholders, offering common solutions to meet the needs of all water users, taking into account also the needs of the environment. Public participation plays a key role in the management plan development process. Questionnaires were used as a key tool in the public discussion and consulting process, through which expert opinions and information were collected to make additions to the water basin management plan. The questionnaires were disseminated through Gegharkunik Marzpetaran, the official website of the Ministry of Environment of the RA, the official website of EUWI+, the social networks of the CWP, as well as various CSO networks. The questionnaire was filled in by local self-government bodies (LSGB) representing 52 communities (57 questionnaires) and by non-governmental stakeholders in the basin – 134 questionnaires .A total of 191 questionnaires were completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia
    Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia DISCLAIMER This report has been developed within the framework of The European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) funded by the European Union, implemented by the OECD in partnership with UNECE. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. FOREWORD The project was implemented as part of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on water policy in Armenia conducted in co-operation with the European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia and facilitated by the OECD and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The OECD commissioned Trémolet Consulting Limited (UK) jointly with JINJ Ltd. (Armenia), which included Sophie Trémolet, Lilit Melikyan, Kevin Tayler, Eduard Mesropyan and Aida Iskoyan, for the analytical work and whom are also the authors of this report. Tatiana Efimova at the OECD provided essential oversight and inputs. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of participants of the EUWI National Policy Dialogue to the project and to this report, and would like to thank the State Committee of Water Systems of Armenia for a very productive co-operation. The authors thank Xavier Leflaive (OECD) for his valuable comments that helped improve both the content and structure of the report, and express their appreciation to Matthew Griffiths (OECD) for professional contributions to the project at its final stage. In addition, the authors thank Shukhrat Ziyaviddinov, Maria Dubois and Lupita Johanson (all OECD), for their valuable contribution to preparing publication of the report. The views presented in this report are those of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Government of Armenia, the European Union, or the OECD and its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and Deportation of Azerbaijanis
    GENOCIDE AND DEPORTATION OF AZERBAIJANIS C O N T E N T S General information........................................................................................................................... 3 Resettlement of Armenians to Azerbaijani lands and its grave consequences ................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Iran ........................................................................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Turkey ................................................................................... 8 Massacre and deportation of Azerbaijanis at the beginning of the 20th century .......................... 10 The massacres of 1905-1906. ..................................................................................................... 10 General information ................................................................................................................... 10 Genocide of Moslem Turks through 1905-1906 in Karabagh ...................................................... 13 Genocide of 1918-1920 ............................................................................................................... 15 Genocide over Azerbaijani nation in March of 1918 ................................................................... 15 Massacres in Baku. March 1918................................................................................................. 20 Massacres in Erivan Province (1918-1920) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Ground Survey
    Chapter 3 Ground Survey Chapter 3 Ground Survey 3.1 Drilling, Laboratory Tests The outline of the lithologic structure in Yerevan can be understood by the geological maps and the collected drilling database, which contains 5,094 logs; however, the data concerning the S wave velocity for the amplification analysis and the soil properties for the liquefaction analysis are not enough. To collect these data, 10 drillings were newly conducted in Yerevan and several tests were conducted using these boreholes. The quantities of the tests are shown in Table 3.1-1. Table 3.1-1 Quantities of Tests Category Quantities Drilling 30m x 10 Groundwater Level Measurement 10 Standard Penetration Test 129 Disturbed Soil Sampling 116 Laboratory Test 116 The drilling points are mainly set to the area where the Quaternary deposits cover because it is effective for the amplification of the earthquake motion by the ground and liquefaction potential. The geologic condition of Yerevan was estimated as follows from the existing information. The rock layer may be shallow in the northern area and the soft soils cover the southern area. Therefore, the selected newly boring points locate in the south of Yerevan city (Figure 3.1-1). The surface soils of each drilling points are shown in Table 3.1-1. The drilling logs are shown in Data Book. The example of drilling log is shown in Figure 3.1-1. 3-1 Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Figure 3.1-1 Location of drilling points Table 3.1-2 Surface geology of the drilling points Quaternary layer Symbol Age No.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project –</Nobr>
    Initial Environmental Examination Loan 2860 (SF) July 2015 ARM: Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project – Additional Financing Improvement of Kotayk Region Settlements Water Supply Systems (revised version) Prepared by the Armenian Water and Sewerage Closed Joint Stock Company (AWSC) for the Asian Development Bank. The initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. HGSN LLC -JINJ Ltd Improvement of the water supply systems of the settlements of Kotayk region STATE COMMITTEE OF WATER SYSTEM UNDER THE RA MINISTRY FOR TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE “ARMWATERSEWERAGE” CJSC FUNDED BY ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING Date of preparation 17.10.2013 Date of revision 14.07.2015 IV Subproject IMPROVEMENT OF THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OF THE SETTLEMENTS OF KOTAYK REGION L2860-ICB-1-03: ABOVYAN, CHARENTSAVAN, HRAZDAN, TSAGHKADZOR TOWNS AND KAGHSI, AKUNK, SOLAK VILLAGES INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION REVISED VERSION Yerevan, July, 2015 Subproject IV Initial Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Positive Outlook for Mineral Sector Growth
    Norwest Mineral Sector Investment Focus MINERAL SECTOR Investment Focus Armenia Positive outlook for mineral sector growth he smallest of the three countries that comprise the Caucasus, Armenia lies at Tthe cultural crossroads between Europe and Central Asia. Trade routes, including parts of the Great Silk Road, have passed through this area for millennia, while the region’s mining history dates back at least 5,000 years. Historical sources suggest that the Sumerians obtained copper from the area east of Lake Van (in present-day Turkey) at that time, later developing the metallurgy of bronze. Industrial-scale metal production began in modern-day Armenia in 1846 with the opening of the Kapan copper mine, still being worked today for copper and other base metals, albeit Although in neighbouring Turkey, Mount Ararat dominates the Yerevan skyline under different ownership. Contents th During the second half of the 20 Century, Armenia past and present 2 Armenia’s mineral resources reflect the Armenia’s mines supplied much of the Soviet country’s complex underlying geology, which Union’s molybdenum and perlite, while at the Alaverdi - risen from the ashes 3 in turn has resulted from crustal movements other end of the scale, volcanic tuff is the facing Mining - a cornerstone of national connected with the impact of the major Arabian stone of choice for a significant proportion of development 3 and Eurasian plates. This process, for which direct the country’s buildings, from domestic to official evidence can be seen in the form of the Caucasus Armenia’s geology and mineral architecture. However, the disintegration of the mountains between Georgia and southern Soviet Union at the start of the 1990s led to resources 4 Russia, and through the regular occurrence of the virtual collapse of the Armenian economy, The mining industry today 5 earthquakes in the region, is continuing.
    [Show full text]
  • Report SEIA Final with Annexes Zip.Indd
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK IN ARMENIAN COMMUNITIES ARMENIA 2020 2020 SEIA REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................................8 SEIA Results at a Glance ............................................................................................................................................................10 Impact of COVID-19 on Armenia’s marzes and communities ...........................................................................................12 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................14 Background ...............................................................................................................................................................................14 SEIA objectives and approach .............................................................................................................................................16 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................................18 Part 1. Key Socio-Economic Development Trends in Armenia Prior to the COVID-19 Outbreak ............................20 Part 2. Assessment of COVID-19’s Immediate Impact
    [Show full text]