HMS London Paying Off Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HMS London Paying Off Newsletter Captain J Garnier MVO FIL (RN) HMS London entering Portsmouth FOREWORD BY CAPTAIN J GARNIER MVO FIL (RN) It will be a sad day for all of us when HMS LONDON pays off in Portsmouth on return from the Caribbean. This fine ship has enjoyed a distinguished career since 1963, and our sadness will be shared by all those who served in previous commissions. We should not, however, allow our regret to dim our memories of the excellent spirit that has always prevailed onboard throughout the life of the ship, and particularly over the last two years. We have been faced with many challenges and I hope that all of you will share my great pride at our achievements. Both operationally and professionally we have reached a very high standard, and the obvious success of our goodwill visits will have contributed significantly to the diplomatic efforts of our national representatives. This has entailed a lot of hard work by everybody, and I have been continually impressed by the outstanding good humour and enthusiasm with which each new task was undertaken. Nor should we forget our families, without whose warm and unflagging support HMS LONDON would not have been such a happy and efficient ship. I am most grateful to the Editors of this booklet for their hard work in providing such an excellent souvenir of a most memorable last commission, and I wish you and your families the best of good fortune in the future. - - INTRODUCTION The aim of this Newsletter is to mark the end of the present HMS LONDON's life. Looking back into history at the careers of the other ships to bear the name, it can be seen that the present day LONDON has had a lot to live up to. The strong ties with the City of London date back to the seventeenth century when the City contributed to the building of the fourth LONDON. Since that time the 'London' ships have had a special association with the capital city. The London of today bas carried on this tradition, each time that the ship has visited the City the age old ties have been re-established and strengthened. By briefly covering the past twenty years from its launching in December 1961 until its Paying Off in December 1981, it is hoped that the ships varied career can be accounted for. Whilst not having an adventurous life as compared to its predecessors it has played its role in the Royal Navy of the present era. The West Indies deployment has been LONDONs 'Swan Song', everyone has enjoyed themselves at one time or another during the trip. The dits in the latter half of the Newsletter telling the story of this last deployment. A lot of work has gone into this Newsletter and it is hoped that the people reading it will be able to grasp the LONDON spirit in the years to come. ·, HMS LONDON History LONDONS PAST There have been 9 other HMS LONDONS, some more famous than others. What follows is a short summary of their careers. 1st LONDON 1620 The first ship to bear the name of LONDON was a famous fighting East Indiaman, privately owned and not a man-of-war. However, such ships did valuable service on the country's behalf and in 1620, LONDON accompanied by three escorts entered Saldanha Bay, just north of Capetown, and took possession of the neighbouring land in the name of James I. Five months later the ship fought two fierce battles against Portuguese corsair squadrons, which were attempting to stop the East India Company from establishing itself in the Persian Gulf. 2nd LONDON 1636 In 1636 another merchantman, the LONDON, equipped as a man of war of 4o guns served in the "ship-money fleet", one of ten vessels furnished by the City of London, in obedience of King Charles I's wish requiring the Lord Mayor to fit out a squadron for service with the Royal Navy. This ship is considered to be the first man-of-war named LONDON in the British Navy. She had an illustrious career, joining Blake's fleet and partaking in the battles of KENTISH KNOCK in the Thames Estuary and with Admiral Monk at GABBARD and SCHEVENINGEN against the Dutch Admiral Tromp. 3rd LONDON - 1656 - 1665 2nd RATE MAN-OF-WAR Built under an order by Cromwell she was launched on 30th July 1656. Cromwell had given the name 'LONDON' to this particular ship as a compliment to the City of London. At the time, however, the general election for the Second Parliament of the Protector was about to take place. London and Middlesex were to hold twelve seats between them; where voting was to be close on a division, these 12 seats were worth securing. Cromwell’s compliments were not usually given as a casual gesture. Cromwell at the time it is worth noting was spending 4/5ths of the National Revenue, of £1,050,000 on building up the British Fleet. He was laying down for the world in general the cardinal principle of his national policy. In his own words, "I will make the name 'Englishman' to be as much dreaded as was ever the name 'Roman Citizen' “• The London was a 2nd rate Han '0' War carrying 64 guns; she was 150ft long, 81ft across her beam and weighed 1050 tons. Her crew was of 360 Officers, men and boys. Her first duties after being fitted out were to fire a salute to Blake’s flagship, the St George, as she carried Blake’s body up the Thames. (He had been killed in a great sea battle against the Dutch). She was used as an escort for the first brigade of ironsides over to Dunkirk, where she witnessed the handing over of the keys of Dunkirk. (After the Battle of the Dunes). In the summer of 1660, after the death of Cromwell, the London formed one or a squadron which fetched Charles 2nd for the Restoration of the Monarchy. London’s own special passenger was the Kings brother, James, Duke of York (later James II). London was flying the flag of Lord High Admiral, the post to which James had been appointed. In March 1665 as the fleet was preparing for the second Dutch war, disaster struck the London. On her way up the Thames she blew up, killing three hundred on board. Only twenty four men and one woman survived the explosion, the cause of which was unknown. 4th LONDON 1665 - 1748 The second Dutch war had just broken out, shots had been fired. The loss at this particular time of one of Britain’s finest man-o-ward was a staggering blow. The City of London was startled and horrified (especially as the ship involved was 'London'). A cry went out to build a new LONDON for the Kings Navy. A letter was sent to the King offering to build a new LONDON. The King highly impressed by the Cities loyalty, announced that the new ship be called 'LOYAL LONDON'. Money for the subscription to build the new 'LOYAL LONDON' was slow in coming forth after the initial cry. However work had started down at Deptford on the new ship. The master builder, a Captain Taylor, who had built the previous LONDON, was to adopt his earlier design, improving on it in certain ways to make the new ship better. The money was now being collected from many sources. Every company in the city was approached - Goldsmiths to Brewers, Mercers, Glaziers, Taylors, Fishmongers and Grocers. The accounts of the building of the LOYAL LONDON were not in fact closed until 5 years later. However the City had kept its promise. The ship was launched in 1665 and was named the 'LOYAL LONDON' on the 10th July 1666, (the naming ceremony was usually carried out after the ship had been launched, as was the custom of those days). The day was a great occasion; the King was present, along with the Lord Mayor and his Sheriffs. The LOYAL LONDON was a three decker of 96 guns, with a crew of 470 men; she was described by Pepys as the best ship in the world. The LOYAL LONDON was described as a 'sea wasp', her sides were a bright canary yellow - the colour of the resin and oil varnish composition dubbed over the oak planking. In startling contrast, two double bands of black extended the length of the ship between each tier of ports and below to the waterline. The bulwarks and upper deck ports of the hull were painted blue, being decorated with arabesque work and gilded moulded wreaths. A gilded carved lion rampant with open jaws and wearing a crown decorated the bows, together with the shield of the City arms. At the stern was a carved representation of the Royal Arms of England painted in heraldic colours, together with King Charles' royal cypher in gilded letters. The whole of the rest of the stern was a mass of gilded brackets and mouldings, particularly around the lattice of the cabin windows. On board, the upperdeck gratings, hatchways and ladders were all painted a dull red - to hide "the unpleasant stains and splashes which occurred during battle". Below decks the woodwork was oiled and dubbed. The 'LOYAL LONDON' was ready to join the fleet the following month. Work had been hurried along as the Dutch fleet had been sailing up and down the English coast for some weeks; The French were poised with their Armies across the Channel. On July 25th 1666, St James Day, the two fleets engaged, the Dutch bad the slight advantage in numbers - 99 to 93 on the English side.
Recommended publications
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1892-1929 General
    HEADING RELATED YEAR EVENT VOL PAGE ABOUKIR BAY Details of HM connections 1928/112 112 ABOUKIR BAY Action of 12th March Vol 1/112 112 ABUKLEA AND ABUKRU RM with Guards Camel Regiment Vol 1/73 73 ACCIDENTS Marine killed by falling on bayonet, Chatham, 1860 1911/141 141 RMB1 marker killed by Volunteer on Plumstead ACCIDENTS Common, 1861 191286, 107 85, 107 ACCIDENTS Flying, Captain RISK, RMLI 1913/91 91 ACCIDENTS Stokes Mortar Bomb Explosion, Deal, 1918 1918/98 98 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Death of Major Oldfield Vol 1/111 111 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Turkish Medal awarded to C/Sgt W Healey 1901/122 122 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Ball at Plymouth in 1804 to commemorate 1905/126 126 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Death of a Veteran 1907/83 83 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Correspondence 1928/119 119 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Correspondence 1929/177 177 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) 1930/336 336 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Syllabus for Examination, RMLI, 1893 Vol 1/193 193 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) of Auxiliary forces to be Captains with more than 3 years Vol 3/73 73 ACTON, MIDDLESEX Ex RM as Mayor, 1923 1923/178 178 ADEN HMS Effingham in 1927 1928/32 32 See also COMMANDANT GENERAL AND GENERAL ADJUTANT GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING of the Channel Fleet, 1800 1905/87 87 ADJUTANT GENERAL Change of title from DAGRM to ACRM, 1914 1914/33 33 ADJUTANT GENERAL Appointment of Brigadier General Mercer, 1916 1916/77 77 ADJUTANTS "An Unbroken Line" - eight RMA Adjutants, 1914 1914/60, 61 60, 61 ADMIRAL'S REGIMENT First Colonels - Correspondence from Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of COPENHAGEN SHIPS of the LINE (Guns)
    THE BATTLE OF COPENHAGEN 2nd. April 1801 THE BRITISH FLEET SHIPS of the LINE (Guns) Elephant (74)* Captain Thomas Foley Captain Thomas Hardy (as volunteer) Defiance (74) Captain Richard Retallick Edgar (74) Captain George Murray Monarch (74) Captain James Mosse Bellona (74) Captain Thomas Thompson Ganges(74) Captain Thomas Fremantle Russell (74) Captain William Cuming Agamemnon (64) Captain Robert Fancourt Ardent (64) Captain Thomas Bertie Polyphemus (64) Captain John Lawford Glatton (50) Captain William Bligh Isis (50) Captain James Walker FRIGATES Amazon (38) Captain Henry Riou Desiree (36) Captain Henry Inman Blanche (36) Captain Graham Hammond Alcmene (32) Captain Samuel Sutton Jamaica (24) Captain Jonas Rose SLOOPS Arrow (12) Commander William Rose Dart (12) Commander John Devonshire BRIGS Cruiser (18) Commander James Brisbane Harpy (18) Commander William Birchall BOMB SHIPS Discovery Commander John Conn Explosion Commander John Martin Hecla Commander Richard Hatherill Sulphur Commander Hender Witter Terror Commander Samuel Rowley Volcano Commander James Watson Zebra Commander Edward Clay FIRE SHIPS Zephyr Commander Clotworthy Upton Otter Commander George McKinley THE COMMANDERS Admiral Sir Hyde Parker Commander­in­Chief, Baltic Fleet. HMS London (not engaged) Vice Admiral Lord Nelson KB Second in Command, Baltic Fleet Commanded the Fleet Action at Copenhagen HMS Elephant Rear Admiral Thomas Graves Third in Command, Baltic Fleet Second in Command at the Fleet Action HMS Defiance Notes: Captains Foley, Hardy, and Thompson had served under Nelson at The Battle of The Nile, 1st. August 1798. Captain William Bligh had resumed service following his acquittal by Court Martial over the Bounty mutiny. Contemporary Reports of the Battle of Copenhagen Foreword by Michael Bruff The following extracts from the Naval Chronicle for 1801 relate to the lead­up to the battle, the engagement itself, and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Burges Watson, C.V.O., R.N. Oct
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 24. 4th 27th Captain Burges Watson, C.V.O., R.N. Oct. Nov. B. 24 Sept 1846, St Nicholas, 1st Son of Rundle Burges Watson R.N. (B. 1809- 1896 1899 Warwick, Warwickshire, England. Alphington, Devon D. 5 July 1860). Who was, in D. 21 Sept 1902 died on Malta of turn eldest son of Captain Joshua Rowley pneumonia (aged 55). Watson (1772-1810) Rundle Burges Watson Mason R.N., died 5 Jul 1806 (while serving as 27 1 Oct 1859 Entered Naval Service aged Nov 1899 Superintendent of Sheerness Dockyard). 1895 13 years. Burges’s mother was Helen (1820-Bathampton April 1861 Census shows Burges Somerset, England.). Watson as a Naval Cadet, aged 14, Issue: 3 children, 1 boy, 2 girls. Ryde, Isle of White. 5 Jul 1866 Naval Cadet Burges 20 Sept 1882 - Married to Marie Thérèse Watson was promoted to Watson (nee Fischer) B. 1856 New Zealand, D. Mate/Sub Lieutenant. Nov 27, 1918 (62 yrs.) London, Middlesex, 5 Sep 1866 Sub Lieutenant Burges England. Watson Promoted to the rank of Lieutenant. Marriage Notice: The Sydney Morning Herald Jun 1867-Jan 1869 Lieutenant (New South Wales: 1842 - 1954) Thu 5 Oct 1882 Burges Watson posted to H.M.S. Page 13 Family Notices: WATSON—FISCHER— “Arethusa”, a wooden 4th Rate, Sept. 20, by Rev. T. Kemmis, Burges Watson, to launched as a sailing vessel of the Marie Thérèse Fischer. Constance class from Pembroke Registration Number Groom's Surname Groom's Royal Dockyard 20 Jun 1849. Her Given Name(s) Bride's Last Name at Time of builder’s measure was 2132 tons Marriage Bride's Given Name(s) District with a displacement of 3832 tons, 2700/1882 WATSON BURGES FISCHER MARIE I armed with 50 guns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispatch of Rear-Admiral Thomas Graves to America in 1780 David
    A Strategy of Detachments: The Dispatch of Rear-Admiral Thomas Graves to America in 1780 David Syrett Le professeur Syrett offre une critique de ce qu'il nomme la « stratégie des détachements » du conseil de l'Amirauté pendant la guerre d'indépendance américaine. Cet article établit la chronologie de l'envoi de l'amiral Sir Thomas Graves vers l'Amérique, en 1780, de la décision d'envoyer un escadron jusqu 'à l'arrivée de celui-ci à New York. Les délais de son départ forment un bon exemple de « friction en temps de guerre ». Syrett met l'accent sur le fait que les décisions prises à Londres l'étaient toujours en réaction au renseignement plutôt que d'être des initiatives. In the American War, unlike in the other maritime conflicts of the eighteenth century, the British followed mostly a strategy of detachments.' In the Seven Years' and French Revolutionary Wars, a strategy of blockade was employed and attempts were made to bottle up enemy naval forces in European seas. By contrast in the American War squadrons of warships were dispatched across the Atlantic in pursuit of enemy forces proceeding to the Western Hemisphere. Beginning in 1778, when Byron with a squadron of warships chased the French admiral Comte d'Estaing, first to America and then on to the West Indies, down to the Saints campaign of 1782,2 British naval strategy, for the most part, consisted of reacting to French and Spanish initiatives by sending British warships across the Atlantic to counter the movements of enemy squadrons of warships. While the application of such a strategy could prove challenging, its effectiveness could be even more tenuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Charles John Balfour, R.N. Mar 1896 B
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 23. 21st Oct. Captain Charles John Balfour, R.N. Mar 1896 B. 3 Oct 1841, Ventnor, Isle of Believed son of Charles Anthony Balfour and 1895 White, Hampshire, England – D. Charlotte Balfour, baptised on the 5 Nov 1841 in 19 Jan 1902, Ealing, Middlesex. Milbrook, Hampshire, England. (aged 61 years). Buried: South Ealing Cemetery, Middlesex, Mason 23 27 Nov London, England. Mar 1896 1895 12 Oct 1854-1 Mar 1856 Charles 1869 Oct-Dec: Marriage of Charles John Balfour John Balfour joined her Majesty's to Constance Marian Brooke (B. Oct 1844, service as a naval cadet, aged 13 Ilfracombe, Devon, England. D. 10 Nov 1910, years, on board H.M.S. “Calcutta” Chichester, Chester, England. Buried. 15 Nov 84 guns, a Teak timber 2nd rate 1910, Ealing & Old Brentford Cemetery [with vessel, launched: Bombay 14 Mar husband Charles John Balfour]). Marriage held 1831. She actively served in the in Exeter, Devon. China war 1856. She carried a complement of 435 officers and Issue: men; 60 boys; 150 marines, when 1. Margaret Edith Balfour (B. 1870, Southsea, operational. She had been paid Hampshire, England) off in 1842 at Plymouth and then 2. Constance M.E. Balfour (B. 1871, Southsea, recommissioned at Devonport Hampshire, England) and utilised as a training and 3. Frances M.L.S. Balfour (B. 1876, Middlesex, gunnery ship. She was of 2299 London, England) tons and finally disposed of in 1908. 2 Mar 1856-25 Aug 1856 Naval Cadet Charles John Balfour re- attached to H.M.S. “London” 90 gun, as a Naval Cadet.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Punishment in the Royal Navy: Discipline on the Leeward Islands Station, 1784-1812 (England)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1987 Crime and Punishment in the Royal Navy: Discipline on the Leeward Islands Station, 1784-1812 (England). John D. Byrn Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Byrn, John D. Jr, "Crime and Punishment in the Royal Navy: Discipline on the Leeward Islands Station, 1784-1812 (England)." (1987). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4345. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4345 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17”x 23” black and white photographic print.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Military Sale 1 – Catalogue.Pdf
    LONDON – MADDOX STREET e Military Sale MedalS, OrderS, decOratiOnS and Militaria Wednesday 5th June 2013 Part of the Noble Investments (UK) PLC Group IMPORTANT NOTICES Please see Conditions of Business and Conditions of Sale at the back of this catalogue Dreweatts & Dreweatts 1759 are trading names of The Fine Art Auction Group Limited. The Fine Art Auction Group Limited is registered in England, company number: 03839469, registered office: 11 Adelphi Terrace, London WC2N 6BJ. Buying at Dreweatts Bidding Increments There are several ways you can bid at a Dreweatts auction; in The Auctioneer will advance bids in the following preset person, by leaving a commission or absentee bid, on the increments, and is under no obligation to accept bids between telephone where available and live via the internet – please make these increments. arrangements before the sale. £200 £220 £240 £260... £300 Bidding in Person £320 £350 £380 £400... £500 If intending to buy you are required to register your name and £550 £600 £650 £700... £1000 details at reception prior to the commencement of the auction. £1100 £1200 £1300 £1400... £2000 You will then be allocated a bidding number, which you use when £2200 £2400 £2600 £2800... £3000 bidding for an item. £3200 £3500 £3800 £4000... £5000 £5500 £6000 £6500 £7000... £10000 Commission Bids £11000 £12000 £13000 £14000... £20000 Dreweatts will execute bids on your behalf if you are unable to £22000 £24000 £26000 £28000... £30000 attend the sale. Commission or absentee bids are accepted either £32000 £35000 £38000 £40000... £50000 directly at reception, or can be sent by post, fax, email, telephone £55000 £60000 £65000 £70000..
    [Show full text]
  • Midshipmen and Quarterdeck Boys in the Royal Navy, 1793-1815 Samantha A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2006 Playing at command: midshipmen and quarterdeck boys in the Royal Navy, 1793-1815 Samantha A. Cavell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cavell, Samantha A., "Playing at command: midshipmen and quarterdeck boys in the Royal Navy, 1793-1815" (2006). LSU Master's Theses. 2356. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2356 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLAYING AT COMMAND: MIDSHIPMEN AND QUARTERDECK BOYS IN THE ROYAL NAVY, 1793-1815 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Samantha A. Cavell Bachelor of Business, Queensland University of Technology, 1990 Brisbane, Australia May 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables . iv Abstract . v Introduction . 1 Two Critical Events for the Georgian Navy . 4 Testing Social Theories Using the Royal Navy Model . 8 Identifying the Quarterdeck Boy . 16 The Midshipman’s Lot. 21 Part I – Selecting Young Gentlemen for Sea Service Noble Rot . 27 Changing Selection . 28 Sobriety, Diligence, and Qualifications - The Ideal Young Gentleman . 34 Connections, Interest, and Patronage .
    [Show full text]
  • Forging Close Relationships with Allies Is a Force Multiplier An
    SURFACE SITREP Page 1 P PPPPPPPPP PPPPPPPPPPP PP PPP PPPPPPP PPPP PPPPPPPPPP Volume XXXI, Number 1 April 2015 Forging Close Relationships with Allies is a Force Multiplier An Interview with Admiral Mark Ferguson, USN Commander, Allied Joint Force Command, Naples; Commander US Naval Forces, Europe and Commander, US Naval Forces, Africa Conducted by CAPT Edward Lundquist, USN (Ret) Can you share with us the headquarters that is your synopsis of the certified for that year is major challenges that the one that steps up and face you today in your serves as the operational job as Commander of commander. Naval Forces Europe and Africa? I would imagine that My position is unique in force would be prepared that I wear three hats. and certify that year for First, I’m Commander of what the anticipated Joint Force Command, threat would be. Naples, under NATO. I In November, we have an 800 person staff conducted a very large based in Lago Patria. We exercise called Trident are an operational level Juncture 15. Our air headquarters and I’m the component commander current NATO Response was a French General Force Commander for based in Lyon, the the year. I am also the maritime component Operational Commander commander was Spanish, for NATO Forces in NAPLES, Italy (March 6, 2015) Adm. Mark Ferguson, commander of U.S. Naval the Special Forces were Kosovo, numbering Forces Europe-Africa, delivers closing remarks at the 2015 Combined Force Maritime Polish, and the land about 4,500 troops. That Component Commander (CFMCC) Flag Course Africa at Naval Support Activity component was the consumes a lot of my time Naples.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. Wliile the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]