DOCSLIB.ORG

IPARD Programme 2007-2013”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IPARD Programme 2007-2013” “IPARD Programme 2007-2013” Ex-post Evaluation of the IPARD Programme 2007-2013 of the Republic of North Macedonia FINAL REPORT This project is funded by Evaluation is performed by the European Commission Project Planning & Management Ltd EX-POST EVALUATION OF IPARD PROGRAMME 2007- 2013 REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA Contract No. IPARDMA/03/2018 FINAL REPORT / Version 2/ Date: 22/06/2020 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared with the financial assistance of the European Commission. The views expressed herein are those of the consultants and therefore in no way reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Authors of the Report: Project Planning and Management Ltd. - Senior Local Expert Quality assurance: Project Planning and Management Ltd. Contractor name and address: Project Planning and Management Ltd. 98A Kniaz Boris I Str., Sofia, Bulgaria Phone: +359 2 953 3567 / Fax: +359 2 905 8810 e-mail: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 8 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 10 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 18 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Purpose of the report ........................................................................................................................................ 21 3. THE EVALUATION CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Economic Context ....................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Policy Background....................................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Legal context ............................................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Description of the evaluation process: Recapitulation of the terms of reference, purpose and scope of the evaluation .......................................................................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Brief outline of previous evaluations related to the programme ......................................................... 28 3.6 Supplementary instruments of international support ......................................................................... 29 4. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ............................................................................................................... 31 4.1 Explanation of the evaluation design and the methods used ............................................................ 31 4.2 Description of key evaluation criteria ................................................................................................. 32 4.3 Source of data used for the evaluation .............................................................................................. 32 4.4 Limitations in the Applied Methodology ....................................................................................................... 34 5. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAMME, MEASURES AND BUDGET ................................................................. 36 5.1 General background .......................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Composition of the programme, description of priorities and measures and budget ......................... 37 5.3 Institutional framework ...................................................................................................................... 40 5.4 Review of the Accreditation Process ................................................................................................. 51 5.5 Timeliness of the implementation process ........................................................................................ 55 5.6 Approval-Rejection Process .............................................................................................................. 60 5.6 Analysis of the Intervention Logic of individual measures ........................................................................... 63 5.6.1 Measure 101 - Investments in Farms for Purpose of restructuring and achievement of Community standards ....................................................................................................................................... 63 2 5.6.2 Measure 103 - Investments in processing and marketing of agricultural and fishery products for the purpose of restructuring these activities and achieving them within community standards ......................... 92 5.6.3 Measure 302 - Diversification and development of rural economic activities ........................... 111 5.6.4 Measure 501 - Technical Assistance ....................................................................................... 131 6. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS .............................................................................................. 139 6.1 Evaluation of Target Indicators - Completion and Responses ......................................................... 139 6.2 Answers to Examination Issues at Programme Level – Summary Findings .................................... 143 6.3 Questions related to institutions involved in the management of IPARD programme ...................... 147 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 150 7.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................... 150 7.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 154 7.2.1 Recommendations for the selection process .......................................................................................... 154 7.2.2 Recommendations for a more integrated approach of the stakeholders ................................................ 154 7.2.3 Additional recommendation .................................................................................................................... 155 ANNEXES ....................................................................................................................................................... 156 ANNEX 1 Survey Analyses. Successful Beneficiaries ..................................................................................... 157 Summary of general data ................................................................................................................................ 158 Survey findings for MEASURE 101: ................................................................................................................ 161 Survey findings from Measure 103 .................................................................................................................. 165 Survey findings Measure 302 .......................................................................................................................... 166 ANNEX 2. Survey analyses: Rejected IPARD applicants ................................................................................ 167 ANNEX 3. Stakeholder lists interviewed in the process of the ex-post evaluation.......................................... 172 Beneficiaries of the Programme ...................................................................................................................... 172 Rejected applicants of the Programme Interviewed during the evaluation process. ........................................ 181 Measure 101 ................................................................................................................................................... 181 Measure 103 ................................................................................................................................................... 201 Measure 302 ................................................................................................................................................... 203 Representatives of Institutional Stakeholders Interviewed .............................................................................. 206 ANNEX 4. Consolidated Survey results .......................................................................................................... 207 APPROVED APPLICATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 207 Measure 101 ..................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohrid Municipality I
    PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Rehabilitation of various streets and two local roads and procurement of special vehicles for communal enterprise August 2014 OHRID MUNICIPALITY I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY Ohrid municipality is one of 80 municipalities in the Republic of Macedonia and belongs to the South West planning region occupying part of Ohrid-Struga valley, Lake Ohrid and part of Galicica National Park. It borders Debarca municipality to the north, Resen municipality to the east, Struga municipality to the west and Albania to the south. Total area of 383.93km 2 comprises 204km 2 land and 179.93km 2 water. Total population is 55,749 inhabitants. The climate is continental with some Mediterranean influence coming through the mountain of Galicica. There are 18 urban communities and 26 rural communities in the city. Ohrid city and the Ohrid Lake became a world cultural and natural heritage under the protection of UNESCO since 1979. Figure 1: Republic of Macedonia *note: the municipal territory is marked in green 2 Figure 2: Municipalities of the South West region *The South-west planning region is one of eight statistical regions within the Republic of Macedonia. It comprises 9 municipalities: Vevcani, Debar, Debrca, Ohrid, Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Plasnica, Struga and Centar Zupa. B. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE According to the last 2002 Census the total number of inhabitants in the municipality is 55,749 from which male are 27,598 and female 28,151 with natural increase of 0.4%. In relation to the ethnic affiliation of the citizens, the prevailing population are Macedonians, representing 85% of the total population (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Implementation of the Plan of Activities for Visibility and Comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020
    Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE FORESTRY AND WATER ECONOMY Managing Authority REPORT on implementation of the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020 (According to Article 30, paragraph 3 of the Sectoral Agreement) (March 2016 – December 2017) December 2017 Project implemented by: IPARD Managing Authority, Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy Str. Aminta Treti 2, Skopje; Tel: +389 2 313 44 77 Financed: Measure Technical Assistance under IPARD Programme 2014-2020 1 Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee I. INTRODUCTION In the period 2016-2017 , the following activities from the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014-2020 were realized: 1. Update of website www.ipard.gov.mk ; 2. IPARD info events; 3. Trainings, workshops and seminars 4. Appearances on national and local radio and television stations as newspapers and Internet portals; 5. Publications of leaflets, brochure, supplements; The institutions responsible for the implementation of the abovementioned activities, respectively to their powers and the functions they perform, were the following: the Managin Authority (MA) within Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy and the Agency for Financial Support of Agriculture and Rural Development (AFSARD). II. IMPLEMENTED ACTIVITIES 5TU U5T 1. Updating the website www.ipard.gov.mk The new MA website www.ipard.gov.mk5TU U5T that was launched in July 2016 is registering great increase of visits and if in the first months the average number of visits was up to 2000, in January 2017, more than 9000 visits have been registered. In the period July 2016 –December 2017 in total 519.455 visitors on the website have been registerd.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGY for SOCIAL INCLUSION, SOCIAL PROTECTION and ALLEVIATING POVERTY in the MUNICIPALITY of NEGOTINO Јuly2011
    STRATEGY FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION, SOCIAL PROTECTION AND ALLEVIATING POVERTY IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF NEGOTINO Јuly2011 Publisher Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights – BIM-FV Skopje The preparation and the printing of this publication is supported by The Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC) Prepared by Liljana Alceva – Local consultant on behalf of BIM-FV Marina Dimova – Assistant to the local consultant Contact person from the Municipality of Negotino Slobodanka Krteva, Coordinator of the Local Partnership Group Project Human Rights and Social Inclusion in Macedonia Institute of Human Rights Ludwig Boltzmann- BIM-FV, Skopje ul. “Veljko Vlahovic” 1 A-1 / 4 1000 Skopje tel.: +389 (0)2 3216 956 AND SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION, STRATEGY OF NEGOTINO THE MUNICIPALITY POVERTY IN ALLEVIATING fax: +389 (0)2 3216 982 BIM-FV Support Team, Skopje 1 Petranka Delova-Miladinova - Project Manager Stojan Mishev - Human Rights Advisor Ninoslav Mladenovic – Human Rights Advisor Jagoda Iljov - Administrative Assistant Contact Person from the Ministry of Labour and Social Aairs of the RM Irena Todoroska - Head of Sector for Social Inclusion Translation from Macedonian into English Tatjana Stoimenovska The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not always reect the ocial position of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights (BIM-FV) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC) When using the data, please indicate the source: STRATEGY FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION, SOCIAL PROTECTION AND ALLEVIATION OF POVERTY IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF NEGOTINO, CONTENT Address of the Mayor of the Municipality of Negotino 3 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 1. Process of Preparation of the Strategic Plan for Alleviation of Poverty and Social Exclusion 5 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • ESMP Karbinci Correct Title__Eng Final
    Environmental and Social Management Plan for the Sub-Project „ Plachkovica-natural beauties with unique and diverse cultural and historical heritage “ Environmental and Social Management Plan for the Sub-Project: Plachkovica-natural beauties with unique and diverse cultural and historical heritage Municipality of Karbinci, June 2020 1 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the Sub-Project „ Plachkovica-natural beauties with unique and diverse cultural and historical heritage “ Content: 1. Description of the project …………………………………………….4 2. Legal framework………………………………………………………14 3. Basic Data/ Description of the municipality………………………………...17 4. Environmental and Social Impacts……………………………….....26 5. Mitigation measures……….…………………………........................32 6. Environmental and Social Management Plan………………………36 2 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the Sub-Project „ Plachkovica-natural beauties with unique and diverse cultural and historical heritage “ Introduction Local and Regional Competitiveness Project (LRCP) is a four-year investment operation, supported by the European Union using funds from IPA II earmarked for competitiveness and innovation in N. Macedonia. LRCP will be managed as a Hybrid Trust Fund and consists of four components, executed by the World Bank and the Government of N. Macedonia. The Project will provide investment funding and capacity building to support sector growth, investment in destinations and specific destination prosperity. At the regional and local levels, the Project will support selected tourism destinations in the country through a combination of technical assistance to improve destination management, infrastructure investment and investments in linkages and innovation. The investments will be undertaken through a grant scheme for the regional tourism stakeholders such as municipalities, institutions, NGOs and private sector. The investment will be made through a grant scheme for the regional tourism actors, such as municipalities, institutions, NGOs, and the private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Vkupno Naselenie Vo Zemjata Total Population in The
    REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA DR@AVEN ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKA REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE POPIS NA NASELENIETO, DOMA]INSTVATA I STANOVITE VO REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA, 2002 definitivni podatoci Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia, 2002 final data VKUPNO NASELENIE VO ZEMJATA - DEFINITIVNI PODATOCI PO NASELENI MESTA - NASELENIE VO ZEMJATA SPORED AKTIVNOSTA I POLOT BOOK XII XII TOTAL POPULATION IN THE COUNTRY - FINAL DATA BY SETTLEMENTS - POPULATION IN THE COUNTRY ACCORDING TO THE ACTIVITY AND SEX KNIGA KNIGA PRI KORISTEWE NA PODATOCITE DA SE NAVEDE IZVOROT: POPIS NA NASELENIETO, DOMA]INSTVATA I STANOVITE VO REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA, 2002 - KNIGA XII WHEN USING DATA CONTAINED HERE, PLEASE CITE THE SOURCE AS FOLLOWS: CENSUS OF POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, 2002 - BOOK XII Izdava~: DR@AVEN ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKA, "Dame Gruev" - 4, Skopje Publisher: THE STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE, "Dame Gruev" - 4, Skopje Odgovara m-r Don~o Gerasimovski, direktor For the publisher: M.Sc. Donco Gerasimovski, Director Broj na stranici: 399 Number of pages: 399 Pe~ateno vo Pe~atnicata na Slu`bata za op{ti i zaedni~ki raboti pri Vladata na Republika Makedonija Printed in Printing House at General Administration Services at the Government of the Republic of Macedonia Tira`: 500 primeroci Number of copies printed: 500 2 Popis na naselenieto, doma}instvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija, 2002 PREDGOVOR Popisot na naselenieto, doma}instvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija be{e sproveden vo periodot od 1 do 15 noemvri 2002 godina. Podatocite vo popisnite obrasci se zapi{ani so sostojba na den 31 oktomvri 2002 godina vo 24 ~asot, odnosno na polno} pome|u 31 oktomvri i 1 noemvri 2002 godina.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Touristic Itinerary in the Region of Prespa Abstract
    International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection Vol. 4, No. 7, 2016 ISSN 2309-0405 CREATING TOURISTIC ITINERARY IN THE REGION OF PRESPA M.Sc. Ema MUSLLI, PhD Candidate University of Tirana ABSTRACT The Prespa Region is located on the Balkan Peninsula, between the countries of Albania, Macedonia and Greece. It includes Greater Prespa Lake and the surrounding beach and meadow areas, designated agricultural use areas and the towns of Pustec, Resen and Prespes. This region is now a part of the Trans-Boundary Biosphere Reserve ‘Ohrid-Prespa Watershed. Greater and Lesser Prespa lakes plus Ohrid Lake are included in the UNESCO world Heritage Site. This area has been known historically for its diverse natural and cultural features. Prespa Region is currently covered by Prespa National Parks in Albania and Greece and Galichica and Pelisteri National Parks in Macedonia. The natural environment and the cultural heritage are a key element designated for the development of the region’s sustainable tourism. This study was enhanced via the Geographic Info System (GIS) digital presentation showing the opportunities for nature tourism in the Pustec and Resen commune. The article also includes two touristic itineraries that will help a better promotion of the tourism in the Prespa Region. Keywords: Touristic potential, cultural heritage, nature heritage, touristic itineraries. INTRODUCTION The Greater Prespa Watershed is located in the southeastern region of Albania and in the southwestern part of Macedonia, in the region of Korçë, commune of Pustec in the Albanian part, in the Resen commune in the Macedonian part and in the Prespe commune in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Prespa Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis
    Lake Prespa Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis July 2009 Lake Prespa – Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis CONTENTS Abbreviations Summary 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Structure of Summary TDA ........................................................................ 1 2 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Stakeholder and governance analysis........................................................ 3 2.3 Identification of transboundary environmental stresses .............................. 3 2.4 Analysis of root causes of environmental stress ......................................... 4 3 Description Lake Prespa Basin .......................................................................... 5 3.1 Physical and geographic description of the basin ....................................... 5 3.1.1 Lake, river and groundwater systems ..................................................... 5 3.1.2 Land Resources ..................................................................................... 5 3.1.3 Mineral resources .................................................................................. 6 3.1.4 Climate .................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Ecosystem status ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: PAD3461 Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF EUR 46 MILLION (US$50.5 MILLION EQUIVALENT) Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA FOR AN AGRICULTURE MODERNIZATION PROJECT January 7, 2020 Public Disclosure Authorized Agriculture and Food Global Practice Europe And Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective November 30, 2019) Currency Unit = EUR EUR 1.0 = US$ 1.10 US$ 1.0 = EUR 0.9094 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Regional Vice President: Cyril E Muller Country Director: Linda Van Gelder Regional Director: Steven N. Schonberger Practice Manager: Frauke Jungbluth Task Team Leader(s): Silvia Mauri ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ABP Animal By-Products AFP Agri-food Platform AFSARD Agency for Financial Support of Agriculture and Rural Development AIR Annual Implementation Report AREC Agency for Real Estate and Cadastre CAP Common Agricultural Policy CCC Collection and Conditioning Center CMEF Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework CMES Common Monitoring and Evaluation System CPF Country Partnership Framework DG AGRI Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    [Show full text]
  • (Ipa) Rural Development Programme 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA EU INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION (IPA) RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 Table of Contents 1. TITLE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ............................................................ 10 2. COUNTRY PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Geographical area covered by the Programme ...................................................................... 10 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ................................................................... 11 3.1 General socio-economic context .................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Definition of areas related to Programme implementation ..................................................... 11 3.1.2 Demographic situation ............................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.3 Administrative system ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.4 Economic Drivers, Productivity and Growth .................................................................................. 15 3.1.5 Labour market ............................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.6 Education system ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Ipa) Rural Development Programme 2014-2020
    IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA EU INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION (IPA) RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 (first modification) Skopje, January 2019 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 10 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... 10 1. TITLE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ..................................................................... 14 2. COUNTRY PROFILE ............................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Geographical area covered by the Programme .............................................................. 14 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ............................................................................ 15 3.1 General socio-economic context .......................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Definition of areas related to Programme implementation ............................................ 15 3.1.2 Demographic situation ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Municipality of Valandovo Project Appraisal Document “Procurement
    MUNICIPALITY OF VALANDOVO PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT “PROCUREMENT OF MECHANIZATION FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE COMMUNAL SERVICES IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF VALANDOVO” Skopje, January 2021 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. General description ................................................................................................................. 6 1.1.1. Current condition ............................................................................................................ 6 1.1.2. Future condition ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1.3. Strategic goals ............................................................................................................... 15 1.1.4. Knowledge and experience of municipality of Valandovo............................................ 15 1.2. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 16 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 16 2.1. General information on the municipality ............................................................................. 16 2.2. Demographic profile ............................................................................................................. 18 2.3. Economic profile
    [Show full text]