Canadian Mineraloslst Vol. 14, pp. 387-390 (197Q

ZEMANNITE,A ZINGTETLURITE FROM MOCTEZUMA, SONORA, MEXICO

J. A. MANDARINO Department of Mineralogy and Geology, Royal Ontario Museum, L00 Qaeeds Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada E. MATZAT Mineraloglsch-krlstallographisches Institut, University of Gdttingen, Gdttlngen, Gennany S. J. WILLIAMS Pera State College, Pera, Nebraska, U,S-4.

ABSIRAG"I fesseurJosef Zemann,de I'Universit6 de Vienne, qui a contribu6 tellement i nos connaissancesdes struc- Zemannite occurs as minute hexagonal prisms tures des compos6sde tellure. terminated by a bipyramid. The mineral is light Clraduit par le journal) to dark brown, has an adamantine , and is brittle. It is uniaxial positive:

hardness was not determined, but the mineral Zemannite is uniaxial positive with or=1.85 is quite soft and is very brittle. Although the and e-1.93. The mineral is dichroic with or red- density could not be measured, it was calculated dish brown and e yellowish brown; absorption, to be about 4.36:L0.08 glcn8. The method of .ole. calculation is given in a later section. Cnvster.r.ocnepgy Zemannite is hexagonal, space gf,oup P6s/ m - Cab a 9,4I:O,02, c 7.64f.0.O2A, c;a = 0.8119, I/-585.9A8, Z=2. T\e crystals are moryhologically simple and consist of only two forms: {1010} and {10i1}. The habit is usually prismatic, but a few crystals with a very small prhm development have been seen. No twinning was observed. The angular relations of the two - forms are: {10f0}, O 30' oo,op = 90o 00t; - {1011} 0 30' OO',p 43" O9t.A typical crystal is shown in Figure 1. Full details of the structure of zemannite are given by Matzat (L967). The X-ray powder dif- fraction data are grven in Table 1.

CHEMTcaL CotvtposrtroN A complete chemical analysis was not per- formed. Partial XRF and electron microprobe FIG. 1. A typical crystal of zemannite showing the analyses indicated that the atomic ratio of Zn forms ane {1010} {10T1}. to Fe is between 3:1 and 3:2. The atomic ratio 'I. of (Zn*Fe) to Te is about 2t3. Small amounts TABLE X.MY POI{DERDATA FOR ZEMANNITE of Mn, Mg, and Na were detected, but do not exceed one percent each. 'r '10 'l0Trolo 8.r50 8.15 3143 4 The structural determination by Matz.at (1967) s.5i4 3282 rr!o 4.705 showed that zemannite is a zeolite-like tellurite \z so50 'I 2020 4.075 B 21tr4 with a negatively charged framework of Zna rrZl 4.006 4'152 1 00!2 3.820 3.80 3 soSt (IeOr), with a large (8.28A diameter) sftannel 2021 3.594 40tI3 2 running parallel to [0001]. These shannels are r oT2 3.458 3.44 1 336-0 2r30 3.080 3.07 4 30-34 \z statistically occupied by Na and H ions and 1122 2,966 2.96 6 4260 possibly by HeO. Partial analyses and the 2r3l 2.857 I .645 6 JJb I \z zo72 2.788 2.178 9 4261 crystal structure analysis suggest the formula 3o3o 2.717 SaaJ (Zn,Fe)z(IeO:)aNa"Hr"'IHrO, where .r can vary 3o3r 2.560 ? 1oJ5 r ol3 2.431 5052 from 0 to 2. Type material is ferroan zemannite. 21i2 2.398 ?.390 3 2244 zz4o 2.352 z.J4a 5 5rq0 3i40 2.260 3r94 1.459) 2241 2.248 4153 1.4581 I .455 Celcur,lrroN oF DENsrry lr 23 2.240 2.242 rlz 1.453) 3032 2.214 2.207 4 3&2 'I1.451 Because of the small size of the crystals, it 3rlr 2,168 5r0l .438 2023 2.I60 2.160 5 r.431 was not possible to measure the density of the 4oEo 2.038 4zdz 1.428 2242 2.003 1 1.393 mineral. A crystal placed in a liquid with a 4oAr r.969 t3g3'I1.373 density of 4.05 g/cm3 sant, thus establishing 1.963 2115 'I.369 3rf2 1.946 Y; 5192 .367 the fact that the density was greater than 4.05 0094 'II.9t0 2 6060 I .358 glcml. The density of zemannite was calculated 3250 .870 4370 I .340 r oI4 r .860 6oEl in the following manner. 'r I J 'I 3013 .858t 3254 'I.336 From tle unit cell dimensions and the formu- 325r 1.8i6 'I.336 4042 I .798 4 3035 '|.332 la (Zn,Fe)z(IeOs)aNaJIz*'yHrO, it is obvious 415o 1.778 $71 .320 that a range in densrty can be calculated for nA 1.770 v" 4263 'lI .318 I .316 4t5t '11.732 szlo 305 each value of y varying the value of .r between zo14 .7301 1.728 | 0 and 2. The lower limif sf this range is 3.705 g/cme .r=0 y-0; i.e, the formula Cu.traradiation, camera dlam. ll4.6m, m€asurenents corrected where and for film shrlnkago, RoMspeclnen numberltl?5933, fllm No, 3477. is (Zn,Fe),CIeOa)'H, (the amounts of Zn and

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/canmin/article-pdf/14/3/387/3420048/387.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 ZEMANNTTB, A NEV/ ANC TELLURITE 389

TABLE2. SAmPLECALCULATToN 0F THE DENSITy 0F (Znr.ruFeo.uu)(reOr)rNatr.SHrO

Constituent 1,1t.%=p k pk/100 Denslty frcm Gladstone-Dalerelationship 'I 'l Zn0 4. 35 0. 58 0,0227 o -';t " - 4.g8s/cm3 Fe0 6.10 0.188 0.0115 ## TeO, 62.55 0.183 0.'l't45 Density from unit cell NaZ0 4.05 0.190 0.0077 o-ffi- l!!8#- 4.34s/cm3 Hzo 12.95 0.340 0.0440 u - nolecularweight Total I 00.00 0.2004 z - numberof formulaunits per unit cell tp765.45 x-0.200 Y - volumeof unit cell 4 = Avogadro'snurnber (0.6023x1024)

Fe in the formula ate, respectively 1.35 and of various compsitions in two ways. First, the 0.65 throughout this discussion. This is equiva- density wascalculated in the usual way from the lent to an atomic ratio for Zn:Fe of about 2 to unit-cell parameters.Next, the density was cal- 1). There is no upper limit if it is assumed that culated from the Gladstone-Dalerelationship. y can vary infinitely. Obviously, there must be n-r used is p : where p is a limit to the number of water molecules that The formula K , can be accommodated in the channel Without density, Z is the meanreftactive index, and K is going into this question, however, it is possible the specificrefractive energyof the mineral. The to calculate a probable upper limit for the mean refractive index for a uniaxial mineral to reduce the density of zemannite and, further, : range in density. such as zemanniteis given by the tormula,T .s-t2,., -L.E . The value of K must be calculated The approach was to calculate the densities J

F (t, z lrl o lrl J o I lrl o= oF o J (9

3.50 4.OO 4.5O 5.OO UNIT CELL DENSITY Frc. 2. Unit sell densrty versus Gladstone-Dalodensity qf (7n1.asFe6.es)Cfeos)aN%Hr*'lHao,for various values of r and y.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/canmin/article-pdf/14/3/387/3420048/387.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 390 TIIE CANADIAN I\4INERALOCIST

ftom tle weight percentagesof eachconstituent AcrNowr,nncuvrENTS for a particular mmposition and from the spe- The writers wish to thank D. cific refractive energiesof those constituents. IUr. B. Sturman who prepared Figure 1, Mr. D. R. McKinnon The formula for this relationship is: /l : prepared bh who Figure 2, and Miss IL Driver who hrft, + kzqz +, ...ffi. Here,kt, k' typed the manuscript Dr. D. C. Haris provided i6ti ffi partial XRF analyses. etc. are the specific refractive energies of the constituents and Pr, fu etr. are tJre weight per- RSF.ERBNCES centages of the constituents. The values of the (1965): &'s used in these calculations are those given by GAr\rEs,R. V. Mineralizacion de telurio eu la mina Moctexuma, Mandarino (1976). A sample cerca de Mocteznrma,So calculation for an tora. Univ. Nat. Auton. M€xico, Inst. Geol. Bol. assumed composition of (Znr.arFeo.as) (TeOs)g 75, Pt. l. NaH . 5 H:O is given in Table 2. -, (1970): The Moctezumatellurium de- The values of the two densities were calcu- posit. Mineral. Record L, 4043. lated for various compositions and are plotted Meroenmo, J. A. & Wu-LraMs,S. J. (1961): Five against each other in Figure 2. T:he composi- new minerals from Moctezuma, Sonora, Mexico. tional limits of zemannite are represented by a Sclcncet33,2Ot7. band running from upper left to lower righl , MarzAT, E. & Wn-r-reus, S. I. (1969): The width of the band is governed by the value Znmqnnite, a new tellurite mineral from Moc- of .;r. The length of the band is determined by t€zuma, Sonora, Mexico. Can. Ml,neral. 10, 139- the value of y. The line at 45o to the soordinates 140 (Abstr.). represents points where ttre "structural" den- -, (1976): The Gladstone-Dalerelationship. sities are equal to the "Gladstone-Dale" den- Part Ir Derivation of new constants.Can. Min- sities. This line intersects the band at 4.28 eral. (in press). g/cma and 4.44 g/cm'. The density of zeman- MArzAT, E. (1967): Die Krista[struktur eines un- nite is probably between these two values. The benannten zeolithartigen Telluritminerals, {(n, averageof these values is 436 g/clor3.In Figure Fe)rfIeOrl")NaJIz-.]HeO. Tschermaks Mlneral 2, this density correspondsto a composition of Petrog. Mitt. XU, 108-117. (Zn,Fe),(f eO.)rl.[aH.5. 2HrO. Manuscript received March 1976.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/canmin/article-pdf/14/3/387/3420048/387.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021