DOCSLIB.ORG

What Are China's Regional Ambitions?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Are China's Regional Ambitions? WHAT ARE CHINA’S REGIONAL AMBITIONS? By Maj Gen Harsha Kakar (Retd) China’s spate of strong military and economic actions, against its adversaries, are neither rushed nor a reaction to threats. In every case, it is China which has taken the first offensive step, militarily pushingagainst nations across the region. Though the current Chinese leadership faces internal challenges and questioning for its multiple failures ranging from handling of COVID 19 to poor economic revival, it is illogical for them to simultaneously open multiple frontiers, without well-conceived logic. It is also unlikely that all challenges have arisen simultaneously. China has threatened nations in near vicinity with military power and those at a distance by economic actions. Economically, China has challenged Europe and Australia, while facing a looming trade war with the US. Militarily, it is displaying aggressive actions against Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. The joint statement last week by ASEAN nations indicated that they are united against China. There is a standoff since May along the Indian LAC. China’s aggressiveness is at levels never witnessed before. It is pressurizing its challengers to a notchbelow that of open hostilities. Such actions cannot be random or uncoordinated. This possibly indicates that either China is preparing decisive military action against one adversary, keeping others subdued or alternatively is seeking to project a message, announcing its arrival on the world stage as a 2 challenger to the US. While the US expects China to attempt military action against one adversary, the second option of conveying a global message is equally probable. For any Chinese leadership to reverseinternal dissent and challenges, there are one of two major adversaries, which it could attempt to subdue. These could be either Taiwan or India. Hence, maximum probing is currently on against these two countries. India has always been a challenger to China. Its proximity to the US as also its close partnerships in organizations which threaten Chinese power in Asia make it a suitable target. If China manages to subdue India and change status quo in Ladakh, either with or without employment of military power, it could send a strong global message.A strong military counter deployment by India would make any such attempt of subduing by China difficult. Taiwan has always been considered a renegade state by China. Under Xi Jinping, China has attempted to isolate Taiwan, forcing it out of global forums, as well as increasing military and economic coercion to compel it to amend its policy into one ofvoluntary reunification, at some future date. The re- election of Tsai Ing-wen, in Jan this year, with a strong majority, ended this Chinese dream. This has led to China resorting to military threats against Taiwan. Li Zuocheng, member of the Chinese Military Commission, stated in end May, ‘If the possibility for peaceful reunification is lost, the people's armed forces will, with the whole nation, including the people of Taiwan, take all necessary steps to resolutely smash any separatist plots or actions,’ adding ‘we do not promise to abandon the use of force, and reserve the option to take all necessary measures, to stabilise and control the situation in the Taiwan Strait.’ Chinese aircraft have repeatedly violated Taiwanese airspace, while its aircraft carrier led fleet has sailed in its waters on multiple occasions in recent times. China has also been conducting amphibious exercises along its coast displaying an intent to invade Taiwan. Its Southern Command appears to be gearing up for operations. Ithasalso been broadcasting its offensive actions against Taiwan. 3 An article in The Global Times of 26th Jun stated, ‘For the eighth time in June, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reportedly sent military aircraft to Taiwan’s southwestern airspace,’ adding, ‘(these flights are launched) with the aim of gathering military information from Taiwan, and suppressing potential US and Japanese reinforcements coming from the Miyako Strait and Bashi Channel.’ In the first three weeks of Jun, Taiwan was compelled to scramble its aircraft four times to chase away Chinese military aircraft approaching the island. Taiwan is a supporter for the ongoing agitation in Hong Kong, an action which has adverselyimpacted China. The Taiwanese President, Tsai Ing-wen, stated in May, ‘Taiwan will even more proactively perfect and forge ahead with relevant support work, and provide Hong Kong’s people with necessary assistance.’ China, on the other hand, has accused supporters of Taiwan independence of colluding with protesters in Hong Kong.In case the scenario in Hong Kong worsens, then Chinese focus will meander towards Taiwan. It is considering this factor, that the US has deployed its aircraft carrier led fleets in the region. Against India, China has been involved in a standoff along the LAC in multiple locations. The standoff was planned and conceived to be prolonged. Its troops moved in prepared for physical violence, just below levels of firing, thus displaying that it has yet to violate the multiple agreements signed between the two nations. It has accepted talks to resolve the incursions, however, is in no hurry, while reports of build-up continue. The Chinese force levels in Ladakh are currently not intended for large scale military operations. How would this change with passage of time remains a mute question. The Chinese intention currently appears to be to tie down Indian forces and the Indian government from actively supporting the US. Its propaganda machinery and comments by its stakeholders including the Chinese Ambassador in Delhi are in same tune. They keep mentioning resolution of the current standoffs, with no timetable. If China is seeking military action for Xi Jinping to counter internal threats and strengthen his position, then they could be aimed at one of these two nations, where Chinese armed forces are openly displaying an offensive character, while keeping the other at bay. While Taiwan may not directly jump to back India, however, it could provide the US requisite support to enhance pressure on China. India, on the other hand could join the US in activating the 4 QUAD militarily to offset Chinese military actions against Taiwan. Hence, China may seek to pressure one nation, while it acts offensively against the other. The US, in response to China’s provocations is redeploying part of its forces, currently in Germany into the Indo-Pacific. Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State mentioned that China’s threats to India and South East Asia were amongst the main reasons for the US to reduce its troops in Europe. He stated, ‘We are going to make sure we are postured appropriately to counter the PLA. We think that this is the challenge of our time and we are going to make sure we have resources in place to do that.’ Alternatively, this pressure on India and Taiwan could also be aimed at broadcasting a global message. The non-official message which China would be attempting to convey is that the world is bipolar and regions of influence between the US and China are distinctly dividedas also China would not desire any interference by the US in its own zone of influence, where it seeks to be a dominant power, which is the Indo-Pacific. It has hinted that if it decides to act, the US may not find requisite support to stop China. It is proving this by simultaneously challengingall its adversaries in the region. By adopting economic measures with nations in Europe and Australia it is conveying its power to challenge US hegemony in regions where the US traditionally dominates, thereby announcing that it possesses economic might to challenge US domination. Intelligence may provide all inputs, less intentions of the adversary. China has hidden its intentions well. Its employment of military and economic power against adversaries spread across the region is not a simple response to threats. It is a well evaluated strategy, with a predetermined end state. Whether the ultimate objective is India or Taiwan remains to be seen. Neither nation can let its guard down. Simultaneously, if it continues with its posturing, then it is seeking to convey a strong global message. Its true intentions would flow with time. Disclaimer: Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of CENJOWS. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indo-Pacific
    INDO-PACIFIC Chinese Central Military Commission Issues New Outline of Joint Operations OE Watch Commentary: China’s Central Military Commission (CMC) has issued an outline for improving the joint combat capabilities of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The CMC is China’s senior military authority. According to a press release regarding the outline (which itself is not public) published by state-run press agency Xinhua, the document represents the highest level of the Chinese military’s system of operational regulations and is meant to clarify responsibilities and generally standardize how operations work at higher levels across the PLA. While references to the PLA’s joint operations appeared in white papers in the early 2000s, real progress toward actually reaching that goal has only appeared in the past ten years. At the end of 2015, the CMC reorganized China’s military regions into a system of joint Theater Commands and abolished the General Staff Department in favor of a Joint Staff Department with clearer lines of communication and a less dominant role for PLA ground forces. The 2019 Defense White Paper released by the Chinese State Council previously General Li Zuocheng, chief of the Joint Staff Department of the committed the PLA to “generally achieve mechanization by the year 2020 with Central Military Commission. Source: Chief Petty Officer Elliott Fabrizio via Wikimedia,, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/ significantly enhanced informatization and greatly improved strategic capabilities,” China%E2%80%99s_Central_Military_Commission_Gen._Li_Zuocheng.jpg, Public Domain essentially completing modernization by 2035 and “fully transforming” into “world- class forces” by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 China Military Power Report
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 Office of the Secretary of Defense Preparation of this report cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $181,000 in Fiscal Years 2018-2019. This includes $12,000 in expenses and $169,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019May02 RefID: E-1F4B924 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 A Report to Congress Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as Amended Section 1260, “Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China,” of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Public Law 115-232, which amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, Section 1202, Public Law 106-65, provides that the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report “in both classified and unclassified form, on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the People’s Liberation Army and the tenets and probable development of Chinese security strategy and military strategy, and of the military organizations and operational concepts supporting such development over the next 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on China's Military Reforms and Modernization: Implications for the United States Hearing Before the U.S.-China Economic
    HEARING ON CHINA'S MILITARY REFORMS AND MODERNIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES HEARING BEFORE THE U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2018 Printed for use of the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission Available via the World Wide Web: www.uscc.gov UNITED STATES-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON: 2018 U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION ROBIN CLEVELAND, CHAIRMAN CAROLYN BARTHOLOMEW, VICE CHAIRMAN Commissioners: HON. CARTE P. GOODWIN HON. JAMES TALENT DR. GLENN HUBBARD DR. KATHERINE C. TOBIN HON. DENNIS C. SHEA MICHAEL R. WESSEL HON. JONATHAN N. STIVERS DR. LARRY M. WORTZEL The Commission was created on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for 2001 § 1238, Public Law No. 106-398, 114 STAT. 1654A-334 (2000) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 7002 (2001), as amended by the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for 2002 § 645 (regarding employment status of staff) & § 648 (regarding changing annual report due date from March to June), Public Law No. 107-67, 115 STAT. 514 (Nov. 12, 2001); as amended by Division P of the “Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003,” Pub L. No. 108-7 (Feb. 20, 2003) (regarding Commission name change, terms of Commissioners, and responsibilities of the Commission); as amended by Public Law No. 109- 108 (H.R. 2862) (Nov. 22, 2005) (regarding responsibilities of Commission and applicability of FACA); as amended by Division J of the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008,” Public Law Nol. 110-161 (December 26, 2007) (regarding responsibilities of the Commission, and changing the Annual Report due date from June to December); as amended by the Carl Levin and Howard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Is Accelerating the Thucydides Trap in US-China Relations
    Covid-19 is Accelerating The Thucydides Trap in US-China Relations Ifty Islam, [email protected], June 2, 2020 From “Frenemies” to Cold Warriors US-China tensions, which are the worst since the 1989 Tiannemen Square crisis, have re- emerged as a major theme for global markets joining the debate on the shape of the recovery, the scale of further policy stimulus and the prospects for a vaccine before year. The announcement at the NPC annual meeting on a new Security Law to be imposed on Hong Kong is the immediate focal point of the rapid worsening of US-China tensions. But we believe more significant is that a more assertive China reflects a major shift in Chinese leadership thinking that recognises the inevitability of worsening relations with the US. The Covid 19 crisis is accelerating their move into Thucydides trap, the battle between the incumbent great power and the rival, which will be a major risk factor for the global economy and markets. Anti-China blame with clearly be the preferred strategy for Trump’s re-election campaign, with the current turmoil in US cities from the George Floyd protests increasing the importance of a need for a political scapegoat. But Beijing is pushing back far more aggressively than most would have anticipated. The hardening of hard-line sentiment reflects in part the need to distract from the worsening economy as a result of Covid-19. But President Xi Jinping is also likely to have concluded that with recession and collapsing exports unavoidable, now is the time to accelerate the shift to less reliance on external demand.
    [Show full text]
  • In Maldives Standoff, China Looks to Safeguard Growing Interests Matt Schrader
    VOLUME XVI • ISSUE 1 • JANUARY 11, 2016 VOLUME XVIII • ISSUE 4 • FEBRUARY 26, 2018 IN THIS ISSUE In a Fortnight: In Maldives Standoff, China Looks to Safeguard Growing Interests Matt Schrader Party Congress Reshuffle Strengthens Xi’s Hold on Central Military Commission Nan Li "Full Employment" in Tibet: The Beginning and End of Chen Quanguo's Neo-Socialist Experiment Adrian Zenz Beijing’s Vision for a Reshaped International Order Nadége Rolland Amphibious Operations: Lessons of Past Campaigns for Today’s PLA Kevin McCauley In a Fortnight: In Maldives Standoff, Yameen to free a number of jailed opposition leaders and restore them to their seats in Parliament, a move which China Looks to Safeguard Growing would restore the opposition’s parliamentary majority. The Interests court also vacated a conviction of exiled former president Mohamed Nasheed. Yameen responded on February 5 By Matt Schrader with a 15-day “state of emergency,” seeking to annul the ruling. On February 20, he extended the state of emer- A deepening electoral crisis in the small island nation of the gency a further 30 days. As of this writing, the situation re- Maldives, located roughly 300 miles west-southwest of In- mains fluid. dia’s southern tip, has highlighted the growth of Chinese interests in a part of the world long considered India’s stra- Both China and India have significant equities in the Mal- tegic backyard, and points the way toward likely future dives. Geographical proximity has long given India a strong Sino-Indian friction, both in the Maldives and elsewhere voice in Maldivian affairs, and former president Nasheed is throughout the Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joint Operation Structure of the Chinese People's Liberation Army with Focus on the Reorganization of the Chain of Command
    The Joint Operation Structure of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army with Focus on the Reorganization of the Chain of Command and Control under the Xi Jinping Administration* Yasuyuki Sugiura** Abstract In November 2013, at the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Xi Jinping, Chairman of the Central Military Commission, announced the implementation of national defense and military reform. Drawing special attention among the series of reforms was the question of what kind of organizational reform China would be doing to strengthen the joint operation structure. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reforms, announced in waves between the autumn of 2015 and February 2016, exceeded the expectations of many observers by beginning with the abolition of the four general departments structure and the seven military regions system. This change has been called the “greatest reform since the birth of the nation,” with some even calling it the Chinese version of the Goldwater–Nichols Act. The main interest of this study lies in revealing the present situations of the joint operation structure of the PLA with a focus on the reorganization of the chain of command and control through the series of reforms. Specifically, the main purpose of this study is to shed light on the following points: 1) Overview: How did the reform unfold, and what changed? 2) The features and the aims: What are the features of the reform, and what are the aims? 3) Political background: Why did they launch the reform, and
    [Show full text]
  • SPF China Observer China Observer Project Web Collection (March to August 2018)
    Research Report SPF China Observer China Observer Project Web Collection (March to August 2018) https://www.spf.org/spf-china-observer/en/ Research Report SPF China Observer “China Observer” Project Web Collection (March to August 2018) About this Publication There have been visible signs of improvements in Japan-China relations since the second half of 2017. Looking at the press coverage of the visit to China of Mr. Toshihiro Nikai of the Liberal Democratic Party in December 2017, it could be seen that China was seeking to improve relations with Japan. Since the start of 2018, this movement to improve Japan-China relations has become even more substantial. That same year, a Japan, China and Korea Summit was held in Tokyo on May 9, for the first time in two and a half years, and Prime Minister Abe signaled his intention to have a summit meeting with President Xi Jinping on the occasion of the “Eastern Economic Forum” held in Vladivostok, Russia in September. He further noted that he was planning a visit in October. There is no question about the momentum towards the improvement of relations between Japan and China as we marked the 40th anniversary of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Japan and China in 2018. Probably behind this move to seek improved relations with Japan is China’s desire to balance strong pressure from the United States over the trade imbalance and other economic issues. Furthermore, the concentration of power within China to President Xi Jinping and the increased caution surrounding this has impacted its policy towards the United States and has also influenced the effectiveness of the pressure that is being applied by the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • “Young Guards”: the Recent High Turnover in the PLA Leadership (Part III: Personal and Political)
    Promoting “Young Guards”: The Recent High Turnover in the PLA Leadership (Part III: Personal and Political) Cheng Li The most noticeable trend under the leadership of Xi Jinping since the 2012 National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been the continuing consolidation of power. In particular, the military has been a key forum in which Xi has strengthened both his personal power and his new administration’s authority. Xi has adopted several approaches and political tactics to achieve this, including purging the two highest-ranking generals under the previous administration for corruption and other charges; arresting 52 senior military officers on various charges of wrongdoing; reshuffling generals between regions, departments, and services; attempting to systematically reform the PLA’s structure and operations; and, last but not least, rapidly promoting “young guards” ( ) in the Chinese military. These bold moves will have profound implications—not only for Xi’s political standing in the lead-up to the next leadership turnover in 2017, but also for the development of civilian-military relations in the country and for the trajectory of China’s military modernization. The third installment in this series focuses on personnel changes that have occurred during the early phase of military reform. Who are the rising stars in the PLA following the recent reorganization and reshuffling? What are the distinguishing characteristics of the “young guards”? What are possible explanations for and implications of some of the highest-level
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman Xi Remakes the PLA: Assessing Chinese Military Reforms
    Edited by Saunders, Ding, Chairman Xi Remakes the PLA hina’s current military reforms are unprecedented in their Scobell, Yang, and ambition and in the scale and scope of the organizational Wuthnow ASSESSING CHINESE MILITARY REFORMS Cchanges. Virtually every part of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) now reports to different leaders, has had its mission and Chairman Xi Remakes the PLA Xi Remakes Chairman responsibilities changed, has lost or gained subordinate units, or has undergone a major internal reorganization. Drawing on papers presented at two conferences co-organized by the U.S. National Defense University, RAND, and Taiwan’s Council REFORMS MILITARY CHINESE ASSESSING of Advanced Policy Studies, this edited volume brings together some of the world’s best experts on the Chinese military to analyze the various dimensions of the reforms in detail and assess their implications for the PLA’s ability to conduct joint operations, for the Chinese Communist Party’s control of the army, and for civil-military integration. The contributors review the drivers and strategic context under- pinning the reform effort, explore the various dimensions of PLA efforts to build a force capable of conducting joint operations, con- sider the implications for the PLA services, and examine Xi Jinping’s role in driving the reforms through and using them to strengthen control over the military. The chapters chronicle successes and outstanding problems in the reform effort, and consider what the net effect will be as the PLA strives to become a “world- class” military by mid-century, if not much sooner. Edited by Phillip C.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
    China Data Supplement September 2008 J People’s Republic of China J Hong Kong SAR J Macau SAR J Taiwan ISSN 0943-7533 China aktuell Data Supplement – PRC, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan 1 Contents The Main National Leadership of the PRC ......................................................................... 2 LIU Jen-Kai The Main Provincial Leadership of the PRC ..................................................................... 30 LIU Jen-Kai Data on Changes in PRC Main Leadership ...................................................................... 37 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Agreements with Foreign Countries ......................................................................... 44 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Laws and Regulations .............................................................................................. 47 LIU Jen-Kai Hong Kong SAR................................................................................................................ 48 LIU Jen-Kai Macau SAR....................................................................................................................... 55 LIU Jen-Kai Taiwan .............................................................................................................................. 60 LIU Jen-Kai ISSN 0943-7533 All information given here is derived from generally accessible sources. Publisher/Distributor: GIGA Institute of Asian Studies Rothenbaumchaussee 32 20148 Hamburg Germany Phone: +49 (0 40) 42 88 74-0 Fax: +49 (040) 4107945 2 September 2008 The Main National Leadership
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/83 the Covid-19 Pandemic Complicates Japan-China Relations
    ISSUE: 2020 No. 83 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE ANALYSE CURRENT EVENTS Singapore | 5August 2020 The COVID-19 Pandemic Complicates Japan-China Relations: Will This Benefit ASEAN? David Arase* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Due to China’s coronavirus lockdown, Japan’s imports from China in February 2020 fell by almost half from a year earlier. This disrupted the flow of parts to Japanese factories and goods to Japanese retail malls, which sharply affected Japan’s exports, GDP, and consumer welfare. • The $2.2 billion fund announced on 7 April has a narrow and limited intention to restore production of critically needed goods such as medical masks, help Japanese firms seeking to relocate outside China, and mitigate accumulating supply chain risk in China which Japanese firms had been ignoring. • This move initially appeared to be only a minor setback to warming Sino-Japanese relations. • However, far-reaching consequences of the coronavirus pandemic have caused adjustments to Japan’s perceptions and foreign relations in such a way as to make this move part of an overall setback in Japan-China relations. • Japan’s post-pandemic foreign policy outlook may create new opportunities for ASEAN-Japan cooperation. * Guest writer, David Arase, is Resident Professor of International Politics, the John Hopkins University-Nanjing University Center for Chinese and American Studies, Nanjing, China. 1 ISSUE: 2020 No. 83 ISSN 2335-6677 INTRODUCTION In early April 2020 as the coronavirus pandemic sharply curtailed Japan’s supply of intermediate and finished goods produced by supply chains anchored in China, Japan earmarked ¥220 billion of its emergency economic support package to help Japanese manufacturers shift production of critically needed goods from China to Japan and another ¥23.5 billion to move production to third countries.
    [Show full text]
  • El 19° Congreso Nacional Del Partido Comunista De China
    Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Facultad de Economía Centro de Estudios China-México Número 1, 2018 El 19° Congreso Nacional del Partido Comunista de China Eugenio Anguiano Roch Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Dr. Enrique Graue Wiechers Rector Dr. Leonardo Lomelí Vanegas Secretario General Mtra. Mónica González Contró Abogada General Dr. Alberto K. Oyama Nakagawa Secretario de Desarrollo Institucional Mtro. Javier de la Fuente Hernández Secretario de Atención a la Comunidad Universitaria Ing. Leopoldo Silva Gutiérrez Secretario Administrativo Facultad de Economía Mtro. Eduardo Vega López Director Lic. Rosa Carmina Ramírez Contreras Secretario General Lic. Porfirio Díaz Rodríguez Secretario Administrativo Lic. Dulce María Ruedas Moreno Coordinadora de Comunicación Social Lic. Ricardo Iglesias Flores Coordinador de Publicaciones Centro de Estudios China-México Dr. Enrique Dussel Peters Coordinador Dra. Yolanda Trápaga Delfín Responsable Editor Responsable: Dr. Sergio Efrén Martínez Rivera Comité Editorial: Alejandro Álvarez Bejar, Eugenio Anguiano Roch, Romer Cornejo Bustamante, Huiqiang Cheng, Leonel Corona Treviño, Marcos Cordeiro Pires, Enrique Dussel Peters, Octavio Fernández, Juan José Ling, Xue Dong Liu, Ignacio Martínez Cortés, Jorge Eduardo Navarrete López, Manuel Pérez García, María Teresa Rodríguez y Rodríguez, Xiaoping Song, Hongbo Sun, Mauricio Trápaga Delfín, Yolanda Trápaga Delfín, Zhimin Yang, Yongheng Wu (†). Diseño de portada: Mauricio Trápaga Delfín Corrección de estilo: Stella Cuéllar Cuadernos de Trabajo del Cechimex, revista bimestral, 2018. Editor Responsable: Sergio Efrén Martínez Rivera. Número de certificado de reserva otorgado por el Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor para versión impresa: 04-2010-071617584500-102. Número de certificado de licitud de título y de contenido (15252). Domicilio de la Publicación: Centro de Estudios China-México de la Facultad de Economía, edificio “B”, segundo piso, Ciudad Universitaria.
    [Show full text]