DOCSLIB.ORG

Threat Assessment and Its Perils an Interview with Cecil D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Issue 83, 4th Quarter 2016 Threat Assessment and Its Perils An Interview with Cecil D. Haney Commentary on JOINT FORCE QUARTERL Chinese Military Reforms Y ISSUE EIGHTY -THREE, 4 TH QUARTER 2016 Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 83, 4th Quarter 2016 http://ndupress.ndu.edu Gen Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., USMC, Publisher MajGen Frederick M. Padilla, USMC, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Production Editor John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Book Review Editor Dr. Frank G. Hoffman Art Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Printing Office Advisory Committee COL Michael S. Bell, USA (Ret.), Ph.D./College of International Security Affairs; Brig Gen Christopher A. Coffelt, USAF/ Air War College; Col David J. Eskelund, USMC/Marine Corps War College; COL (P) Paul H. Fredenburgh III, USA/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Brig Gen Darren E. Hartford, USAF/National War College; Brig Gen (Sel) Brian E. Hastings, USAF/Air Command and Staff College; RADM P. Gardner Howe III/U.S. Naval War College; LTG Michael D. Lundy, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; LTG William C. Mayville, Jr., USA/The Joint Staff; Col William McCollough, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; MG William E. Rapp, USA/U.S. Army War College; RDML Jeffrey Ruth/Joint Forces Staff College; VADM Kevin D. Scott/The Joint Staff Editorial Board Richard K. Betts/Columbia University; Stephen D. Chiabotti/ School of Advanced Air and Space Studies; Eliot A. Cohen/The Johns Hopkins University; COL Joseph J. Collins, USA (Ret.)/ National War College; Mark J. Conversino/Air War College; Thomas P. Ehrhard/Office of the Secretary of Defense; Aaron L. Friedberg/Princeton University; Bryon Greenwald/Joint Forces Staff College; Col Thomas C. Greenwood, USMC (Ret.)/Office of the Secretary of Defense; Douglas N. Hime/Naval War College; Mark H. Jacobsen/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Col Jerome M. Lynes, USMC (Ret.)/The Joint Staff; Kathleen Mahoney-Norris/Air Command and Staff College; Thomas L. McNaugher/Georgetown University; Col Mark Pizzo, USMC (Ret.)/ National War College; James A. Schear/Office of the Secretary of Defense; LtGen Bernard E. Trainor, USMC (Ret.) Printed in St. Louis, Missouri, by Cover 2 images (top to bottom): Captain Brittny Barney, 1st Helicopter Squadron, performs preflight checks of equipment inside UH-1N Huey at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, August 3, 2016 (U.S. Air Force/Philip Bryant); Sailors secure waist catapults after launching aircraft on flight deck aboard USS Carl Vinson, under way in the Arabian Gulf, March 5, 2012 (U.S. Navy/George M. Bell); Marine with 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit surveys San Clemente Island in search of landing zone during Amphibious Squadron–Marine Expeditionary Unit Integration, prior to deployment to U.S. Pacific and U.S. Central Commands’ areas of operations, July 16, 2016 (U.S. Marine Corps/Robert B. Brown) About the Cover In this Issue U.S. Army 1st Lieutenant Kelly Elmlinger, Warrior Transition Battalion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Dialogue swims preliminary race during 2014 2 From the Chairman Warrior Games at U.S. Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado, September 30, 2014. More Forum than 200 wounded, ill, and injured 4 Executive Summary Servicemembers and veterans participated in the 2014 Warrior 6 Global Power Distribution and Games, an annual event featuring Warfighting in the 21st Century Paralympic-style competitions (U.S. By John R. Benedict, Jr. Army/Ronda Robb) 13 Fast Followers, Learning Machines, and the Third Joint Force Quarterly is published by the National Offset Strategy Features Defense University Press for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. JFQ is the Chairman’s flagship By Brent D. Sadler 66 An Interview with Cecil D. Haney joint military and security studies journal designed to 75 Global Mental Health: inform members of the U.S. Armed Forces, allies, and 19 Predicting the Proliferation other partners on joint and integrated operations; of Cyber Weapons Optimizing Uniformed national security policy and strategy; efforts to combat Services Roles terrorism; homeland security; and developments in into Small States training and joint professional military education to By Brian W. Flynn, Joshua C. transform America’s military and security apparatus By Daniel Hughes and Morganstein, Robert J. Ursano, to meet tomorrow’s challenges better while protecting Andrew M. Colarik Darrel A. Regier, James C. freedom today. All published articles have been vetted through a peer-review process and cleared by the 27 The Danger of False Peril: West, Gary H. Wynn, David M. Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review. Benedek, and Carol S. Fullerton Avoiding Threat Inflation NDU Press is the National Defense University’s cross-component, professional military and academic By Andrew Stigler 83 Applying Smart Power via publishing house. Global Health Engagement The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations By Sebastian Kevany expressed or implied within are those of the JPME Today contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views and Michael Baker of the Department of Defense or any other agency of 34 Wargaming the Third the Federal Government. Offset Strategy 91 NATO Nouvelle: Everything Submissions and Communications JFQ welcomes submission of scholarly, independent By Paul Norwood and Old Is New Again research from members of the Armed Forces, Benjamin Jensen By G. Alexander Crowther security policymakers and shapers, defense analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United 40 I Liked Ike . Whence Comes States and abroad. Submit articles for consideration to ScholarOne, available at https://mc04. Another? Why PME Needs a Recall manuscriptcentral.com/ndupress. Or write to: Congressional Advocate 99 Fighting with Friends: Editor, Joint Force Quarterly By John T. Kuehn Coalition Warfare in Korean NDU Press 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 2504) Waters, 1950–1953 Fort Lesley J. McNair By Corbin Williamson Washington, DC 20319 Commentary Telephone: (202) 685-4220/DSN 325 44 Is the Chinese Army the Real Email: [email protected] Winner in PLA Reforms? Book Reviews JFQ online: www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jfq/jfq.htm th By Phillip C. Saunders and John Chen 4 Quarter, October 2016 105 A Passion for Leadership ISSN 1070-0692 Reviewed by Christopher J. Lamb 49 China’s Military Reforms: An Optimistic Take 107 Carnage and Connectivity By Michael S. Chase and Reviewed by Jeffrey Meiser Jeffrey Engstrom 108 Assessing War 53 Chinese Military Reforms: Reviewed by Jonathan Schroden A Pessimistic Take By Roger Cliff Joint Doctrine 57 PLA Reforms and China’s 109 Let’s Fix or Kill the Nuclear Forces Center of Gravity By David C. Logan By Dale C. Eikmeier 63 What Do China’s Military 116 Joint Doctrine Update Reforms Mean for Taiwan? By Joel Wuthnow Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL students participate in Surf Passage as part of first phase of SEAL training (U.S. Navy/Michael Russell) From the Chairman Strategic Challenges and Implications have previously written in this Joint Readiness responsiveness, flexibility, and resiliency column to share with you the areas One of my priorities is joint readi- is ensuring that our men and women I where I am devoting my time and ness, which, from my perspective, never enter a fair fight. focus: joint readiness, joint warfighting is an ongoing engagement with the capability, and the development of President and Secretary of Defense Strategic Challenges leaders for the future. I have also shared to provide timely and viable military Many of you have heard me talk about with you my thoughts regarding the options that, in the event of a crisis five strategic challenges: the four imperative for the Joint Force to remain or contingency, are responsive to the potential state competitors of Russia, focused on and responsive to the desired policy endstate objectives of the China, Iran, and North Korea, and the current National Command Authority. National Command Authority. I also nonstate challenge of violent extremist That responsiveness underpins healthy consider flexibility (transitioning from organizations. We colloquially refer to civil-military relations and is the hall- one crisis or contingency to another these five challenges as the 4+1. But mark of the Profession of Arms. I now across the range of military options) these challenges cannot be the only ones write to share with you how we are and resiliency (sustaining what the we plan against. I am humble about our channeling these priorities and profes- Joint Force is doing) as part of joint ability to predict the future, so I use the sional focus into execution. readiness. Underlining the principles of 4+1 as a planning construct. Bench- 2 Dialogue / From the Chairman JFQ 83, 4th Quarter 2016 marking the Joint Force against one of continue to advance their interests at the information on a routine basis so they these challenges or two of these state qualitative and quantitative expense of can have real-time ability to see the challenges simultaneously, along with our own. fight; to visualize in time and space the violent extremism, helps inform our The third implication, and to me one opportunities to seize the initiative; and assessment of the current inventory of of the most significant, is that we have a to better identify potential opportunity current joint capabilities and capacities. mandate to keep pace with the character costs. Over time, as we successfully help Looking at the trajectory of capability of war in the 21st century. While the the Secretary of Defense to see the Joint development in the context of the 4+1 nature of war—the violent clash of po- Force better, it will inform the assess- also informs priorities for joint capability litical will—has not changed, we should ment process to make recommendations development.
Recommended publications
  • Richard Russell, the Senate Armed Services Committee & Oversight of America’S Defense, 1955-1968

    Richard Russell, the Senate Armed Services Committee & Oversight of America’S Defense, 1955-1968

    BALANCING CONSENSUS, CONSENT, AND COMPETENCE: RICHARD RUSSELL, THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE & OVERSIGHT OF AMERICA’S DEFENSE, 1955-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joshua E. Klimas, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor David Stebenne, Advisor Professor John Guilmartin Advisor Professor James Bartholomew History Graduate Program ABSTRACT This study examines Congress’s role in defense policy-making between 1955 and 1968, with particular focus on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), its most prominent and influential members, and the evolving defense authorization process. The consensus view holds that, between World War II and the drawdown of the Vietnam War, the defense oversight committees showed acute deference to Defense Department legislative and budget requests. At the same time, they enforced closed oversight procedures that effectively blocked less “pro-defense” members from influencing the policy-making process. Although true at an aggregate level, this understanding is incomplete. It ignores the significant evolution to Armed Services Committee oversight practices that began in the latter half of 1950s, and it fails to adequately explore the motivations of the few members who decisively shaped the process. SASC chairman Richard Russell (D-GA) dominated Senate deliberations on defense policy. Relying only on input from a few key colleagues – particularly his protégé and eventual successor, John Stennis (D-MS) – Russell for the better part of two decades decided almost in isolation how the Senate would act to oversee the nation’s defense.
  • University Microfilms International 300 N

    University Microfilms International 300 N

    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the Him inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin Hlming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
  • Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century

    Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century

    US Army TRADOC TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 AA MilitaryMilitary GuideGuide toto TerrorismTerrorism in the Twenty-First Century US Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC G2 TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity - Threats Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 August 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 1 Summary of Change U.S. Army TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 (Version 5.0) A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century Specifically, this handbook dated 15 August 2007 • Provides an information update since the DCSINT Handbook No. 1, A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, publication dated 10 August 2006 (Version 4.0). • References the U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • References the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Reports on Terrorist Incidents - 2006, dated 30 April 2007. • Deletes Appendix A, Terrorist Threat to Combatant Commands. By country assessments are available in U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • Deletes Appendix C, Terrorist Operations and Tactics. These topics are covered in chapter 4 of the 2007 handbook. Emerging patterns and trends are addressed in chapter 5 of the 2007 handbook. • Deletes Appendix F, Weapons of Mass Destruction. See TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.04. • Refers to updated 2007 Supplemental TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.01, Terror Operations: Case Studies in Terror, dated 25 July 2007. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No. 1.02, Critical Infrastructure Threats and Terrorism, dated 10 August 2006. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No.
  • Civilians: the Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet

    Civilians: the Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet

    Chief of Navy Essay Competition The Youth Division (MacDougall Prize) Civilians: The Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet “We need to think differently […] by reviewing our basic operating concepts, reimagining the way that Navy should view itself in the twenty-first century, re-examining our assumptions and, most importantly, re-engineering our modus operandi…”1 – Vice Admiral Tim Barrett AO CSC RAN On 3rd September 1939 Australia declared war on Germany and by 1941 was seeking innovative ways to sustain the war effort at sea. This need served as the genesis of two important augmentations to the Royal Australian Navy (RAN): the Women’s Royal Australian Naval Service (WRANS) in April2 and the Naval Auxiliary Patrol (NAP) that June3. This essay will briefly identify the role played by the aforementioned services in supplementing an RAN stretched for resources before identifying similar challenges in the Navy of today. It will then explore the possibility of rectifying this by increasing the use of civilian support across the RAN, such as through the introduction of a modern Australian Fleet Auxiliary. Spread across the globe, the RAN realised it would need to do everything it could to maximise the availability of her sailors and warships while continuing to maintain a suitable presence on the home front. For this reason, both the WRANS and NAP would target those not eligible to serve in conflict at sea. Officer Commanding Sydney Naval Establishments Commodore Muirhead-Gould was quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald on the 4th November 1941 as saying the NAP “would not release any member from any other kind of service under the laws of the Commonwealth” and that, while “applications for enrolment were being received from unmarried men under 35 […] these men could be enrolled in the patrol only if they were in reserve occupations or medically unfit”4.
  • Indo-Pacific

    Indo-Pacific

    INDO-PACIFIC Chinese Central Military Commission Issues New Outline of Joint Operations OE Watch Commentary: China’s Central Military Commission (CMC) has issued an outline for improving the joint combat capabilities of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The CMC is China’s senior military authority. According to a press release regarding the outline (which itself is not public) published by state-run press agency Xinhua, the document represents the highest level of the Chinese military’s system of operational regulations and is meant to clarify responsibilities and generally standardize how operations work at higher levels across the PLA. While references to the PLA’s joint operations appeared in white papers in the early 2000s, real progress toward actually reaching that goal has only appeared in the past ten years. At the end of 2015, the CMC reorganized China’s military regions into a system of joint Theater Commands and abolished the General Staff Department in favor of a Joint Staff Department with clearer lines of communication and a less dominant role for PLA ground forces. The 2019 Defense White Paper released by the Chinese State Council previously General Li Zuocheng, chief of the Joint Staff Department of the committed the PLA to “generally achieve mechanization by the year 2020 with Central Military Commission. Source: Chief Petty Officer Elliott Fabrizio via Wikimedia,, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/ significantly enhanced informatization and greatly improved strategic capabilities,” China%E2%80%99s_Central_Military_Commission_Gen._Li_Zuocheng.jpg, Public Domain essentially completing modernization by 2035 and “fully transforming” into “world- class forces” by 2050.
  • 2019 China Military Power Report

    2019 China Military Power Report

    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 Office of the Secretary of Defense Preparation of this report cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $181,000 in Fiscal Years 2018-2019. This includes $12,000 in expenses and $169,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019May02 RefID: E-1F4B924 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 A Report to Congress Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as Amended Section 1260, “Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China,” of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Public Law 115-232, which amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, Section 1202, Public Law 106-65, provides that the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report “in both classified and unclassified form, on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the People’s Liberation Army and the tenets and probable development of Chinese security strategy and military strategy, and of the military organizations and operational concepts supporting such development over the next 20 years.
  • National Defense University 2013-2014 Electives Program Catalog

    National Defense University 2013-2014 Electives Program Catalog

    National Defense University 2013-2014 Electives Program Catalog CONTENTS FALL SEMESTER ............................................................................................................................ 2 *EISENHOWER SCHOOL (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDUSTRIAL COLLEGE OF THE ARMED FORCES)………..….…………………..…… 2 INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT COLLEGE (IRMC) ................................................ 15 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY (NDU) ................................................................................ 18 NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE (NWC) ........................................................................................... 22 COLLEGE OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS (CISA).. ...................................................... 35 SPRING SEMESTER ..................................................................................................................... 36 *EISENHOWER SCHOOL (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDUSTRIAL COLLEGE OF THE ARMED FORCES)…. .................................. 36 INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT COLLEGE (IRMC) ................................................ 48 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY (NDU) ................................................................................. 51 NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE (NWC) ........................................................................................... 57 **COLLEGE OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS (CISA) * All Eisenhower School classes will be identified by the ICAF prefix. **College of International Security Affairs’ spring semester classes have not been
  • Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge

    Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge

    Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge Andrew Krepinevich, Barry Watts & Robert Work 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge by Andrew Krepinevich Barry Watts Robert Work Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 2003 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent public policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking about defense planning and investment strategies for the 21st century. CSBA’s analytic-based research makes clear the inextricable link between defense strategies and budgets in fostering a more effective and efficient defense, and the need to transform the US military in light of the emerging military revolution. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundation, corporate and individual grants and contributions, and government contracts. 1730 Rhode Island Ave., NW Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 http://www.csbaonline.org CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... I I. NEW CHALLENGES TO POWER PROJECTION.................................................................. 1 II. PROSPECTIVE US AIR FORCE FAILURE POINTS........................................................... 11 III. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND ASSURED ACCESS: A CRITICAL RISK ASSESSMENT .29 IV. THE ARMY AND THE OBJECTIVE FORCE ..................................................................... 69 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 93 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the Cold War, the United States defense posture called for substantial forces to be located overseas as part of a military strategy that emphasized deterrence and forward defense. Large combat formations were based in Europe and Asia. Additional forces—both land-based and maritime—were rotated periodically back to the rear area in the United States.
  • Magazine Fall 2014 Volume 1, Issue 1

    Magazine Fall 2014 Volume 1, Issue 1

    A BI-ANNUAL PUBLICATION OF ALLIED LAND COMMAND MAGAZINE FALL 2014 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1 03-06 08-11 12-15 15-18 The Allied Land Deep breathe: Collaborative Staff Operationalising The Command: NATO’s New Corps in brief Synchronization = Comprehensive Approach: Headquarters Focused Practice of the Joint Reflections From HQ ARRC on Land Forces Page Targeting System LAND POWER 1 UKR ROU RUS Headquarters BGR GEO GRC ARM Allied Land Izmir IRN Table of contents SYR Command IRQ 3 Commander Message LANDPOWER 5 Chief of Staff Message The LANDPOWER Magazine is a bi-annual 6 Command Sergeant Major Message publication produced by Allied Land Command (LANDCOM) dedicated to the promotion of actions 7 The Allied Land Command and ideas contributing to the improvement of the NATO Force Structure (NFS) efficiency and effectiveness. Most 10 Forensic Process to Certify as JTF HQ of the authors belong to the command but the views and opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily 12 Feasibility Review of the Joint Task reflect those of the LANDCOM Commander, SACEUR, NATO or its member nations and none can be quoted as Force Structure an official statement of those entities. An electronic version that includes additional 16 Legal Issues Inherent in NATO 3.0 links to in-depth articles, supplementary articles and an ability to provide online comments is available from the 20 Take A Deep breathe LANDCOM website (www.lc.nato.int). All articles are edited for content. 22 Preparing for the Future - NRDC GR 24 LANDCOM 2015 Timeline 26 Creating a More Efficient
  • Winter 2018, No

    Winter 2018, No

    StarshellA little light on what’s going on! A publication for the Naval Assocation of Canada • Winter 2018, No. 81 Orphan Monument No More Halifax’s neglected Bonaventure Monument gets a much-needed facelift 2 | Starshell Winter 2018 Starshell NEW ISSN-1191-1166 From the Editor National Magazine of the Naval Association of Canada Carmel Ecker Magazine Nationale de L’Association Navale du Canada www.navalassoc.ca “You have some big shoes to fill.” which I served for 14 years as a This is what I’ve heard repeatedly writer and graphic designer at CFB since agreeing to take on the role of Esquimalt’s Lookout Newspaper. I editor of the Starshell. treasure the time I spent embed- I daresay it seems like George ded in the community there. Moore WAS the Starshell. He The learning curve was steep. I PATRON: HRH THE PRINCE PHILIP, DUKE OF EDINBURGH took it from a 4 page newsletter grew up in the B.C. interior, had HONORARY PRESIDENT: H. R. (HARRY) STEELE and built it up to a 48 page maga- never been on a military base and zine over 20 years. Anyone who’s knew very little about our Armed BOARD OF DIRECTORS put out an association newsletter Forces. There was a plethora of PRESIDENT: Bill Conconi, [email protected] knows that is a feat of epic new terminology, acronyms, ranks, VICE PRESIDENT: Barry Walker, [email protected] proportions. ships, shore units and many other TREASURER: King Wan, [email protected] And like any good CO, George things to learn.
  • Speaker Bios

    Speaker Bios

    Intelligence Reform and Counterterrorism after a Decade: Are We Smarter and Safer? October 16 – 18, 2014 University of Texas at Austin THURSDAY, OCTOBER 16 Blanton Museum, UT Campus 4:00-5:00pm Welcome Remarks and Discussion: Admiral William McRaven (ret.) Admiral McRaven is the ninth commander of United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla. USSOCOM ensures the readiness of joint special operations forces and, as directed, conducts operations worldwide. McRaven served from June 2008 to June 2011 as the 11th commander of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) headquartered at Fort Bragg, N.C. JSOC is charged to study special operations requirements and techniques, ensure interoperability and equipment standardization, plan and conduct special operations exercises and training, and develop joint special operations tactics. He served from June 2006 to March 2008 as commander, Special Operations Command Europe (SOCEUR). In addition to his duties as commander, SOCEUR, he was designated as the first director of the NATO Special Operations Forces Coordination Centre where he was charged with enhancing the capabilities and interoperability of all NATO Special Operations Forces. McRaven has commanded at every level within the special operations community, including assignments as deputy commanding general for Operations at JSOC; commodore of Naval Special Warfare Group One; commander of SEAL Team Three; task group commander in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility; task unit commander during Desert Storm and Desert Shield; squadron commander at Naval Special Warfare Development Group; and SEAL platoon commander at Underwater Demolition Team 21/SEAL Team Four. His diverse staff and interagency experience includes assignments as the director for Strategic Planning in the Office of Combating Terrorism on the National Security Council Staff; assessment director at USSOCOM, on the staff of the Chief of Naval Operations, and the chief of staff at Naval Special Warfare Group One.
  • Joint Force Quarterly, Issue

    Joint Force Quarterly, Issue

    Issue 100, 1st Quarter 2021 Countering Chinese Coercion Remotely Piloted Airstrikes Logistics Under Fire JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY ISSUE ONE HUNDRED, 1 ST QUARTER 2021 Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 100, 1st Quarter 2021 https://ndupress.ndu.edu GEN Mark A. Milley, USA, Publisher VADM Frederick J. Roegge, USN, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Senior Editor and Director of Art John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Copyeditor Andrea L. Connell Book Review Editor Brett Swaney Creative Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Publishing Office Advisory Committee BrigGen Jay M. Bargeron, USMC/Marine Corps War College; RDML Shoshana S. Chatfield, USN/U.S. Naval War College; BG Joy L. Curriera, USA/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Col Lee G. Gentile, Jr., USAF/Air Command and Staff College; Col Thomas J. Gordon, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Ambassador John Hoover/College of International Security Affairs; Cassandra C. Lewis, Ph.D./College of Information and Cyberspace; LTG Michael D. Lundy, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; MG Stephen J. Maranian, USA/U.S. Army War College; VADM Stuart B. Munsch, USN/The Joint Staff; LTG Andrew P. Poppas, USA/The Joint Staff; RDML Cedric E. Pringle, USN/National War College; Brig Gen Michael T. Rawls, USAF/Air War College; MajGen W.H. Seely III/Joint Forces Staff College Editorial Board Richard K. Betts/Columbia University; Eliot A. Cohen/The Johns Hopkins University; Richard L.