DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Resource Document: Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Resource Document: Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores EPA 530-R-94-031 NTIS PB94-200979 TECHNICAL RESOURCE DOCUMENT EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION OF ORES AND MINERALS VOLUME 4 COPPER August 1994 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste Special Waste Branch 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Technical Resource Document: Copper DISCLAIMER AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The mention of company or product names is not to be considered an endorsement by the U.S. Government or by the EPA. This Technical Resource Document consists of four sections. The first is EPA's Profile of the copper industry; the remaining sections are Reports from several site visits conducted by EPA. The Profile Section was distributed for review to the U.S. Department of the Interior's (DOI's) Bureau of Mines and Bureau of Land Management; the States of Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah; the American Mining Congress (AMC), and environmental organizations. Summaries of the comments and EPA's responses are presented as Appendix 1-A to the Profile Section. The Site Visit Reports were reviewed by individual company, State, and Federal representatives who participated in the site visit. Comments and EPA responses are included as appendices to the specific Site Visit Section. EPA is grateful to all individuals who took the time to review sections of this Technical Resource Document. The use of the terms "extraction," "beneficiation," and "mineral processing" in the Profile section of this document is not intended to classify any waste streams for the purposes of regulatory interpretation or application. Rather, these terms are used in the context of common industry terminology. i Technical Resource Document: Copper TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DISCLAIMER AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................. i 1.0 MINING INDUSTRY PROFILE: COPPER ................................................ 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1-1 1.2 ECONOMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INDUSTRY ......................... 1-3 1.3 ORE CHARACTERIZATION .................................................. 1-8 1.3.1 Porphyry Copper and Associated Deposits ................................ 1-8 1.3.2 Sedimentary and Metasedimentary Deposits ............................... 1-8 1.3.3 Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits .................................. 1-9 1.3.4 Veins and Replacement Deposits ........................................ 1-9 1.3.5 Ultrabasic and Carbonatite Deposits ..................................... 1-9 1.3.6 Mineral Assemblages ................................................. 1-9 1.4 COPPER EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION PRACTICES ..................... 1-11 1.4.1 Extraction Operations ............................................... 1-11 1.4.1.1 Typical Mining Operations ................................... 1-11 1.4.1.2 Surface Mining Methods ..................................... 1-11 1.4.1.3 Underground Mining Methods ................................ 1-14 1.4.2 Beneficiation Operations ............................................. 1-20 1.4.2.1 Conventional Milling/Flotation ................................ 1-20 1.4.2.2 Leach Operations (In Situ, Dump, Heap, and Vat) ................ 1-42 1.5 WASTES AND OTHER MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH COPPER EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION ...................................................... 1-73 1.5.1 Extraction and Beneficiation Wastes and Materials ........................ 1-76 1.5.1.1 RCRA Wastes ............................................. 1-77 1.5.1.2 Materials ................................................. 1-78 1.5.2 Waste and Materials Management ...................................... 1-81 1.5.2.1 RCRA Units .............................................. 1-81 1.5.2.2 Non-RCRA Units .......................................... 1-85 1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................... 1-88 1.6.1 Potential Sources of Contamination ..................................... 1-88 1.6.1.1 Mine Dewatering ........................................... 1-88 1.6.1.2 Releases from Active Leach Units ............................. 1-88 1.6.1.3 Releases from Leach Units During and After Closure .............. 1-89 1.6.1.4 Releases from Tailings Impoundments .......................... 1-89 1.6.1.5 Acid Drainage ............................................. 1-90 1.6.1.6 Beneficiation Reagents ...................................... 1-92 1.6.2 Factors Affecting the Potential for Contamination ......................... 1-92 1.6.3 Affected Media ..................................................... 1-92 1.6.3.1 Ground Water/Surface Water ................................. 1-92 1.6.3.2 Soil ...................................................... 1-93 1.6.3.3 Air ...................................................... 1-93 1.6.4 Damage Cases ..................................................... 1-94 1.6.4.1 National Priorities List ...................................... 1-94 1.6.4.2 304(l) Sites ............................................... 1-94 1.7 CURRENT REGULATORY AND STATUTORY FRAMEWORK ................... 1-95 1.7.1 Environmental Protection Agency Regulations ............................ 1-95 1.7.1.1 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ....................... 1-95 1.7.1.2 Clean Water Act ........................................... 1-96 1.7.1.3 Clean Air Act ............................................. 1-100 1.7.2 Department of the Interior ............................................ 1-101 1.7.2.1 Bureau of Land Management ................................. 1-101 1.7.2.2 National Park Service and Fish and Wildlife Service ............... 1-103 ii Technical Resource Document: Copper 1.7.3 Department of Agriculture ............................................ 1-103 1.7.3.1 Forest Service ............................................. 1-103 1.7.4 Army Corps of Engineers ............................................. 1-104 1.7.5 State Programs ..................................................... 1-105 1.7.5.1 Arizona .................................................. 1-105 1.8 REFERENCES ............................................................. 1-110 2.0 MINE SITE VISIT: ASARCO/TROY MINE ............................................. 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Background ........................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 General Facility Description ........................................... 2-2 2.1.3 Environmental Setting ................................................ 2-7 2.1.3.1 Surface Water .............................................. 2-7 2.1.3.2 Geology ................................................... 2-8 2.1.3.3 Hydrogeology .............................................. 2-8 2.2 FACILITY OPERATIONS .................................................... 2-11 2.2.1 Mining Operations .................................................. 2-13 2.2.2 Milling Operations .................................................. 2-15 2.3 WASTE MANAGEMENT .................................................... 2-18 2.3.1 Types of Waste ..................................................... 2-18 2.3.2 Solid Waste Management Units ........................................ 2-18 2.3.2.1 Tailings Thickener .......................................... 2-18 2.3.2.2 Tailings Pipeline ........................................... 2-19 2.3.2.3 Tailings Impoundment ...................................... 2-19 2.3.2.4 Waste Rock ............................................... 2-24 2.3.2.5 Waste Oil Storage Tanks .................................... 2-24 2.3.2.6 Burn Pit .................................................. 2-24 2.3.3 Waste Water Management Units ....................................... 2-24 2.3.3.1 Mine Water ............................................... 2-24 2.3.3.2 Sanitary Sewage ........................................... 2-25 2.3.3.3 Assay Laboratory Wastes .................................... 2-25 2.3.4 Hazardous Waste Management Unit .................................... 2-25 2.3.4.1 Waste Solvent Tanks ........................................ 2-25 2.4 MONITORING ............................................................. 2-26 2.4.1 Surface Water ...................................................... 2-26 2.4.2 Ground Water ...................................................... 2-29 2.4.3 Air ............................................................... 2-29 2.5 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE ......................... 2-30 2.5.1 Operating Permit ................................................... 2-30 2.5.2 Solid Waste ....................................................... 2-30 2.5.3 Surface Water ...................................................... 2-31 2.5.4 Ground Water ...................................................... 2-31 2.5.5 Air ............................................................... 2-31 2.5.6 Hazardous Waste ................................................... 2-32 2.6 REFERENCES ............................................................. 2-33 3.0 MINE SITE VISIT: SAN MANUEL FACILITY MAGMA COPPER COMPANY .................... 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Background ........................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 General Description .................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 Environmental Setting ...............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium
    In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium (June 2009) l Most uranium mining in the USA and Kazakhstan is now by in situ leach methods, also known as in situ recovery (ISR). l In USA ISL is seen as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable method of mining, and Australian experience supports this. l Australia's first ISL uranium mine is Beverley, which started operation late in 2000. The proposal for Honeymoon has government approval and it is expected to be operating in 2008. Conventional mining involves removing mineralised rock (ore) from the ground, breaking it up and treating it to remove the minerals being sought. In situ leaching (ISL), also known as solution mining, or in situ recovery (ISR) in North America, involves leaving the ore where it is in the ground, and recovering the minerals from it by dissolving them and pumping the pregnant solution to the surface where the minerals can be recovered. Consequently there is little surface disturbance and no tailings or waste rock generated. However, the orebody needs to be permeable to the liquids used, and located so that they do not contaminate ground water away from the orebody. Uranium ISL uses the native groundwater in the orebody which is fortified with a complexing agent and in most cases an oxidant. It is then pumped through the underground orebody to recover the minerals in it by leaching. Once the pregnant solution is returned to the surface, the uranium is recovered in much the same way as in any other uranium plant (mill). In Australian ISL mines (Beverley and the soon to be opened Honeymoon Mine) the oxidant used is hydrogen peroxide and the complexing agent sulfuric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrology of Ore Deposits
    Petrology of Ore Deposits An Introduction to Economic Geology Introductory Definitions Ore: a metalliferous mineral, or aggregate mixed with gangue that can me mined for a profit Gangue: associated minerals in ore deposit that have little or no value. Protore: initial non-economic concentration of metalliferous minerals that may be economic if altered by weathering (Supergene enrichment) or hydrothermal alteration Economic Considerations Grade: the concentration of a metal in an ore body is usually expressed as a weight % or ppm. The process of determining the grade is termed “assaying” Cut-off grade: after all economic and political considerations are weighed this is the lowest permissible grade that will mined. This may change over time. Example Economic Trends Economy of Scale As ore deposits are mined the high-grade zones are developed first leaving low-grade ores for the future with hopefully better technology Since mining proceeds to progressively lower grades the scale of mining increases because the amount of tonnage processed increases to remove the same amount of metal Outputs of 40,000 metric tons per day are not uncommon Near-surface open pit mines are inherently cheaper than underground mines Other factors important to mining costs include transportation, labor, power, equipment and taxation costs Classification of Ore bodies Proved ore: ore body is so thoroughly studied and understood that we can be certain of its geometry, average grade, tonnage yield, etc. Probable ore: ore body is somewhat delineated by surface mapping and some drilling. The geologists is reasonably sure of geometry and average grade. Possible Ore: outside exploration zones the geologist may speculate that the body extends some distance outside the probable zone but this is not supported by direct mapping or drilling.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Extractive Metallurgy Lectures Note
    PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY B.TECH, 3RD SEMESTER LECTURES NOTE BY SAGAR NAYAK DR. KALI CHARAN SABAT DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING PARALA MAHARAJA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BERHAMPUR DISCLAIMER This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. The information presented here is merely a collection by the author for their respective teaching assignments as an additional tool for the teaching-learning process. Various sources as mentioned at the reference of the document as well as freely available material from internet were consulted for preparing this document. The ownership of the information lies with the respective author or institutions. Further, this document is not intended to be used for commercial purpose and the faculty is not accountable for any issues, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of this document. The committee faculty members make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. BPUT SYLLABUS PRINCIPLES OF EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY (3-1-0) MODULE I (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Pyro metallurgy: Calcination and roasting, sintering, smelting, converting, reduction, smelting-reduction, Metallothermic and hydrogen reduction; distillation and other physical and chemical refining methods: Fire refining, Zone refining, Liquation and Cupellation. Small problems related to pyro metallurgy. MODULE II (14 HOURS) Unit processes in Hydrometallurgy: Leaching practice: In situ leaching, Dump and heap leaching, Percolation leaching, Agitation leaching, Purification of leach liquor, Kinetics of Leaching; Bio- leaching: Recovery of metals from Leach liquor by Solvent Extraction, Ion exchange , Precipitation and Cementation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Fluid–Rock Interactions and Lixiviant/Oxidant Behaviour for the In-Situ Recovery of Metals from Deep Ore Bodies
    School of Earth and Planetary Science Department of Applied Geology Understanding Fluid–Rock Interactions and Lixiviant/Oxidant Behaviour for the In-situ Recovery of Metals from Deep Ore Bodies Tania Marcela Hidalgo Rosero This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University February 2020 1 Declaration __________________________________________________________________________ Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief, I declare that this work of thesis contains no material published by any other person, except where due acknowledgements have been made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Tania Marcela Hidalgo Rosero Date: 28/01/2020 2 Abstract __________________________________________________________________________ Abstract In-situ recovery (ISR) processing has been recognised as a possible alternative to open- pit mining, especially for low-grade resources. In ISR, the fluid–rock interaction between the target ore and the lixiviant results in valuable- (and gangue-) metal dissolution. This interaction is achieved by the injection and recovery of fluid by means of strategically positioned wells. Although the application of ISR has become more common (ISR remains the preferential processing technique for uranium and has been applied in pilot programs for treating oxide zones in copper deposits), its application to hard-rock refractory and low-grade copper-sulfide deposits is still under development. This research is focused on the possible application of ISR to primary copper sulfides usually found as deep ores. Lixiviant/oxidant selection is an important aspect to consider during planning and operation in the ISR of copper-sulfide ores.
    [Show full text]
  • Profits from the Past
    Reprocessing and tailings reduction.qxp_proof 29/04/2020 09:50 Page 1 REPROCESSING AND TAILINGS REDUCTION In Colombia, AuVert's technology is being combined with CDE's experience in dewatering Profits from the past and tailings management to extract the remaining precious metals existing in the ground, while removing up to 93% of residual mercury which has to date prevented this land from being used by the local population reasons why mining companies may be cautious about using tailings as backfill material or relocating current day ‘waste’ to an inaccessible area of the mine, according to Gerritsen. “As technology improves, the opportunity to recover more of the metals/minerals increases,” he said. “There are elements where that may not be the case – coal ash, for example, cannot be reprocessed but can be used to produce cement. While tailings dam liabilities and falling water resources are There are certainly opportunities with gold, affecting the ability of miners to start new mines, or expand copper and even coal, for instance.” The strategies companies ultimately pursue for existing ones, these issues are strengthening the case for these ‘waste streams’ depend on the technology reprocessing and retreating ‘waste’ sites or streams. Dan available and the safety of the facilities, Gerritsen Gleeson explores an increasingly diverse market focused on remarked. revenue generation and risk reduction “For instance, it may not be economically viable to reprocess the material currently in a ith improved transparency around recycling and thickening, or SART, plant from BQE tailings storage facility and, therefore, the owner tailings dams and waste stockpiles now Water will only bolster cash reserves through the may decide to close it or put it into a non-active Wpart and parcel of being a responsible recovery of a high-grade saleable copper sulphide state,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11: Beneficiation
    CHAPTER 11 Beneficiation – Comminution Sponsored by: SPONSOR PROFILE Through pioneering the introduction of modern process • project controls and reporting plants and associated technologies to remote and logistically • contract management challenging locations, Lycopodium Minerals Pty Ltd has • procurement and logistics management developed a successful track record in developing and • inspection and expediting commissioning major resource projects worldwide. • quality assurance/quality control Since its establishment in 1992, Lycopodium has become a • financial evaluations leading international engineering and project management • client representation. consultancy, with an enviable reputation for providing Engineering technically innovative and cost-effective engineering solutions. They are focused on the evaluation and development of projects • Conceptual through to detailed design in the fields of minerals processing, materials handling and • across all disciplines: earthworks, civil infrastructure. • structural, mechanical, piping • electrical, instrumentation, control Lycopodium Minerals has undertaken studies and projects across a broad range of commodities including gold (free, • systems, automation and infrastructure. gravity, refractory, preg robbing), base metals (concentrators, Process hydrometallurgy), iron ore, uranium, rare earths and industrial minerals. Their resume of projects reflects diversity in not • Metallurgical test work design only commodity, but client background, technology, scale of • management and interpretation
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Tailings1
    A HISTORY OF MINERAL CONCENTRATION: A HISTORY OF TAILINGS1 by Timothy c. Richmond2 Abstract: The extraction of mineral values from the earth for beneficial use has been a human activity- since long before recorded history. Methodologies were little changed until the late 19th century. The nearly simultaneous developments of a method to produce steel of a uniform carbon content and the means to generate electrical power gave man the ability to process huge volumes of ores of ever decreasing purity. The tailings or waste products of mineral processing were traditionally discharged into adjacent streams, lakes, the sea or in piles on dry land. Their confinement apparently began in the early 20th century as a means for possible future mineral recovery, for the recycling of water in arid regions and/or in response to growing concerns for water pollution control. Additional Key Words: Mineral Beneficiation " ... for since Nature usually creates metals in an impure state, mixed with earth, stones, and solidified juices, it is necessary to separate most of these impurities from the ores as far as can be, and therefore I will now describe the methods by which the ores are sorted, broken with hammers, burnt, crushed with stamps, ground into powder, sifted, washed ..•. " Agricola, 1550 Introduction identifying mining wastes. It is frequently used mistakenly The term "tailings" is to identify all mineral wastes often misapplied when including the piles of waste rock located at the mouth of 1Presented at the 1.991. National mine shafts and adi ts, over- American. Society for Surface burden materials removed in Mining and Reclamation Meeting surface mining, wastes from in Durango, co, May 1.4-17, 1.991 concentrating activities and sometimes the wastes from 2Timothy c.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges Related to the Processing of Fines in the Recovery of Platinum Group Minerals (Pgms)
    minerals Review Challenges Related to the Processing of Fines in the Recovery of Platinum Group Minerals (PGMs) Kirsten C. Corin 1,* , Belinda J. McFadzean 1, Natalie J. Shackleton 2 and Cyril T. O’Connor 1 1 Centre for Minerals Research, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Cape Town, P Bag X3, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa; [email protected] (B.J.M.); [email protected] (C.T.O.) 2 Minerals Expertise Tech Pty Ltd., Germiston 2007, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In order to increase the recovery of PGMs by flotation, it is necessary to optimise the liberation of the key minerals in which the platinum group elements (PGEs) are contained which include sulphides, arsenides, tellurides, and ferroalloys among others, while at the same time ensuring the optimal depression of gangue minerals. In order to achieve this, comminution circuits usually consist of two or three stages of milling, in which the first stage is autogeneous, followed by ball milling. Further liberation is achieved in subsequent stages using ultra-fine grinding. Each comminution stage is followed by flotation in the so-called MF2 or MF3 circuits. While this staged process increases overall recoveries, overgrinding may occur, hence creating problems associated with fine particle flotation. This paper presents an overview of the mineralogy of most of the more significant PGM ores processed in South Africa and the various technologies used in comminution circuits. The paper then summarises the methodology used in flotation circuits to optimise recovery Citation: Corin, K.C.; McFadzean, of fine particles in terms of the collectors, depressants, and frothers used.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Comminution Method on Particle Damage and Breakage Energy
    EFFECT OF COMMINUTION METHOD ON PARTICLE DAMAGE AND BREAKAGE ENERGY Michael Moats, Jan Miller, Chen-Lun Lin and Raj Rajamani Department of Metallurgical Engineering University of Utah Outline • Our Department • High Pressure Grinding • Particle Damage Characterization • Breakage Energy • Application to Simulant Development Department of Metallurgical Engineering • University of Utah is located in Salt Lake City along the Wasatch Mtns. • Only stand alone Metallurgical Engineering department remaining in the U.S. • Traditional curriculum with critical mass of professors – Mineral Processing – Chemical Metallurgy – Physical Metallurgy High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR) HPGR consists of a pair of counter rotating rolls, one fixed and the other floating. The feed is introduced to the gap in between the rolls and they compress the bed of particles. The grinding force applied to the crushing zone is controlled by a hydro-pneumatic spring on the floating roll. Speeds of the rolls are also adjustable to obtain optimum grinding conditions. Comparison of HPGR and AG/SAG Mills Aspect HPGR AG/SAG Mill Grinding Mechanism Inter-particle compression Impact, attrition and compression Residence Time Low-single pass High (feed migrates through length of mill) Wet/Dry Grinding Dry-Low moisture Predominantly wet milling Availability >90% -2-4 change outs pa >90% -1-2 change outs pa Size regulated feed Required Yes-strongly affects stud breakage AG-No, SAG-Sometimes Critical material size Not required Required Product particle Yes (beneficial for downstream Negligible micro-cracking processes Maximum Throughput 2000tph 4000tph Footprint Small Large Specific power 1-5kWh/t 5-12kWh/t Operating cost Overall plant 20% lower Overall plant 20% higher Capital Cost 25% lower 25% higher Delivery time Substantially faster Substantially longer Variation in feed hardness Single parameter variable High losses •Reference: Koenig, R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Smelting Iron from Laterite: Technical Possibility Or Ethnographic Aberration?
    Smelting Iron from Laterite: Technical Possibility or Ethnographic Aberration? T. O. PRYCE AND S. NATAPINTU introduction Laterites deposits (orlateriticsoilsastheyarealsocalled)arefrequently reported in Southeast Asia, and are ethnographically attested to have been used for the smelting of iron in the region (Abendanon 1917 in Bronson 1992:73; Bronson and Charoenwongsa 1986), as well as in Africa (Gordon and Killick 1993; Miller and Van Der Merwe 1994). The present authors do not dispute this evidence; we merely wish to counsel cautioninitsextrapolation.Modifyingour understanding of a population’s potential to locally produce their own iron has immediate ramifications for how we reconstruct ancient metal distribution net- works, and the social exchanges that have facilitated them since iron’s generally agreed appearance in Southeast Asian archaeological contexts during the mid-first millennium b.c. (e.g., Bellwood 2007:268; Higham 1989:190). We present this paper as a wholly constructive critique of what appears to be a prevailingperspectiveonpre-modernSoutheastAsianironmetallurgy.Wehave tried to avoid technical language and jargon wherever possible, as our aim is to motivate scholars working within the regiontogivefurtherconsiderationtoiron as a metal, as a technology, and as a socially significant medium (e.g., Appadurai 1998; Binsbergen 2005; Gosden and Marshall 1999). When writing a critique it is of course necessary to cite researchers with whom one disagrees, and we have done this with full acknowledgment that in modern archaeology no one person can encompass the entire knowledge spectrum of the discipline.1 The archaeome- tallurgy of iron is probably on the periphery of most of our colleagues’ interests, but sometimes, within the technical, lies the pivotal, and in sharing some of our insights we hope to illuminate issues of benefit to all researchers in Metal Age Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Applications of Ore Microscopy in Mineral Technology
    CHAPTER 11 APPLICATIONS OF ORE MICROSCOPY IN MINERAL TECHNOLOGY 11.1 INTRODUCTION The extraction of specific valuable minerals from their naturally occurring ores is variously termed "ore dressing," "mineral dressing," and "mineral beneficiation." For most metalliferous ores produced by mining operations, this extraction process is an important intermediatestep in the transformation of natural ore to pure metal. Although a few mined ores contain sufficient metal concentrations to require no beneficiation (e.g., some iron ores), most contain relatively small amounts of the valuable metal, from perhaps a few percent in the case ofbase metals to a few parts per million in the case ofpre­ cious metals. As Chapters 7, 9, and 10ofthis book have amply illustrated, the minerals containing valuable metals are commonly intergrown with eco­ nomically unimportant (gangue) minerals on a microscopic scale. It is important to note that the grain size of the ore and associated gangue minerals can also have a dramatic, and sometimes even limiting, effect on ore beneficiation. Figure 11.1 illustrates two rich base-metal ores, only one of which (11.1b) has been profitably extracted and processed. The McArthur River Deposit (Figure I 1.1 a) is large (>200 million tons) and rich (>9% Zn), but it contains much ore that is so fine grained that conventional processing cannot effectively separate the ore and gangue minerals. Consequently, the deposit remains unmined until some other technology is available that would make processing profitable. In contrast, the Ruttan Mine sample (Fig. 11.1 b), which has undergone metamorphism, is relativelycoarsegrained and is easily and economically separated into high-quality concentrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioleaching for Copper Extraction of Marginal Ores from the Brazilian Amazon Region
    metals Article Bioleaching for Copper Extraction of Marginal Ores from the Brazilian Amazon Region Dryelle Nazaré Oliveira do Nascimento 1,†, Adriano Reis Lucheta 1,† , Maurício César Palmieri 2, Andre Luiz Vilaça do Carmo 1, Patricia Magalhães Pereira Silva 1, Rafael Vicente de Pádua Ferreira 2, Eduardo Junca 3 , Felipe Fardin Grillo 3 and Joner Oliveira Alves 1,* 1 SENAI Innovation Institute for Mineral Technologies, National Service for Industrial Training (SENAI), Belém, PA 66035-405, Brazil; [email protected] (D.N.O.d.N.); [email protected] (A.R.L.); [email protected] (A.L.V.d.C.); [email protected] (P.M.P.S.) 2 Itatijuca Biotech, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.P.); [email protected] (R.V.d.P.F.) 3 Graduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (Unesc), Criciúma, SC 88806-000, Brazil; [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (F.F.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 5 December 2018; Accepted: 8 January 2019; Published: 14 January 2019 Abstract: The use of biotechnology to explore low-grade ore deposits and mining tailings is one of the most promising alternatives to reduce environmental impacts and costs of copper extraction. However, such technology still depends on improvements to be fully applied in Brazil under industrial scale. In this way, the bioleaching, by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, in columns and stirred reactors were evaluated regarding to copper extraction of a mineral sulfide and a weathered ore from the Brazilian Amazon region.
    [Show full text]