DOCSLIB.ORG

The U.S. Nuclear Disarmament Policy Imposed Towards Iran During Obama’S Presidency with a Focus on the Reasons, Procedures and Implications of This Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The U.S. Nuclear Disarmament Policy Imposed Towards Iran During Obama’S Presidency with a Focus on the Reasons, Procedures and Implications of This Policy People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research جامعة 8 ماي 5491 قالمة University of 8 May 1945 / GUELMA كلية اﻵداب واللغات Faculty of Letters and Languages قسم اﻵداب واللغة اﻻنجليزية Department of Letters and English language Option: Civilization The U.S. Nuclear Disarmament Policy Imposed towards Iran during Obama’s Presidency. A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Letters and English Language in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master Degree of Philosophy in Anglophone Language, Literature and Civilizations Submitted by Supervisor: LABROUKI Yaakoub Mrs. BARES Meryem Board of Examiners Chairwoman: Mrs. ZIYAYA Rima (M/B) (University of 8 May 1945/ Guelma) Supervisor: Mrs. BARES Meryem (M/B) (University of 8 May 1945/ Guelma) Examiner: Mrs. SADAOUI Lamia (M/B) (University of 8 May 1945/ Guelma) Septembre 2016 I Dedication I dedicate this work to my family, my beloved mother, who stayed up all nights with me when I was sick during last few months. I would like to thank her for encouraging me to carry on my academic career and finish university when I was about to leave it for a job opportunity I have received in 2013. Special thanks for my father who really inspired me to love politics and chose civilization because of his discussions which turn around daily political issues. Also this work is dedicated to my brother Ryan who tried hard to reach any congress man in the United States and conduct a short interview with him even though he failed to do so. Big thanks go to my friends and classmates who supported me during the whole year, Houssem, Safwan, Rabeh, and special thanks for Besma, Halima, and Fatma. II Acknowledgments First I would like to single out my supervisor Mrs. BARESM. for her professional guidance, positive feedback and encouragements. I am also grateful to all the teachers at the Department of Letters and English language at Guelma’s University including Pr. Toulgui L, Mr. ATY M. , Mr. BOUDECHICHE H., Mrs ZEMITI A., Mrs. KRIBES A., Miss CHIHEB A. Special thanks to those teachers who worked honestly and with conscience to enlighten our brains and souls. Finally, I would like to thank Mr. CHOUANA K. who provided me with many significant documents and videos which helped me in writing my dissertation. III Abstract The present dissertation discusses the U.S. nuclear disarmament policy imposed towards Iran during Obama’s presidency with a focus on the reasons, procedures and implications of this policy. The study comes to conclude that the real reason behind the permanent American interventions to stop the Iranian nuclear program is the protection of its interests in the Gulf and Middle East regions. This study explored the nature U.S-Iran relations before and after the Islamic Revolution of Iran in 1979. It pointed out the transformation of America from being a trustworthy friend of Iran into a fierce enemy following the fall of the Shah regime and its replacement by an Islamic regime. This work has also traced the evolution of Iran’s nuclear program and the pressure this program has endured and resisted. The major findings of the present dissertation include first the validation of the speculations raised around the American attempt to delay and prevent the Iranians from making further advancements in the nuclear field, and second the affirmation of the positive assumptions attributed to Obama’s “new policy” towards Iran. IV Résumé La présente thèse traite la politique de désarmement nucléaire des Etats-Unis imposé vers l’Iran pendant la présidence d’Obama avec un accent sur les raisons, les procédures et les implications de cette politique. L’étude a conclu que la véritable raison derrière les permanentes interventions américaines contre le programme nucléaire Iranien est la protection de ses intérêts au Golfe et en Moyen-Orient. Cette étude a aussi exploré la nature de la relation entre les Etats-Unis et l’Iran avant et après la Révolution Islamique d’Iran en 1979. Elle a souligné la transformation des U.S.A d’un de l’Iran en un farouche ennemi après la chute du régime du Shah et son remplacement par un régime Islamique. Ce travail a également retracé l’évolution du programme nucléaire Iranien et les pressions que ce programme a soufferts et a résistés. Les conclusions principales de la présente thèse comprennent d’abord la validation des spéculations soulevées autour de la tentative américaine de retarder et d’empêcher les Iraniens de faire d’autres progrès dans le domaine nucléaire, et deuxièmement l’affirmation des hypothèses positives attribuées à la “Nouvelle Politique” d’Obama envers L’Iran. V ملخص اﻷطروحة الحالية تناقش السياسة اﻷمريكية لنزع السﻻح النووي التي فرضت على إيران خﻻل فترة حكم الرئيس أوباما مع التركيز على اﻷسباب،اﻹجراءات واﻵثار المترتبة عن هذه السياسة. تنتهي هذه الدراسة باستنتاج مفاده أن اﻷسباب الحقيقية وراء التدخﻻت اﻷميركية الدائمة لوقف البرنامج النووي اﻹيراني هو حماية مصالحها في منطقة الخليج والشرق اﻷوسط. كما تقوم هذه الدراسة أيضا بالتحقيق في طبيعة العﻻقة بين الوﻻيات المتحدة وإيران قبل وبعد الثورة اﻹسﻻمية في إيران عام 5474. أشارت نتائج هذا التحقيق إلى تحول أمريكا من كونها صديق جدير بالثقة ﻹيران إلى عدو شرس بعد سقوط نظام’الشاه‘واستبداله بالنظام اﻹسﻻمي. هذا البحث أيضا تتبع مراحل تطور البرنامج النووي اﻹيراني والضغوطات التي عانى منها وقاومها. وتشمل النتائج الرئيسية لهذه اﻷطروحة أول إثبات صحة التكهنات التي أثيرت حوﻻ المحاوﻻت اﻷميركية لتأخير و منع اﻹيرانيين من تحقيق المزيد من التقدم في المجال النووي،و ثانيا تأكيد اﻻفتراضات اﻹيجابية حول "سياسة أوباما الجديدة" الموجهة نحو إيران. VI List of Abbreviations/Acronyms BBC British Broadcasting Corporation CIA Central Intelligence Agency IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INTEC Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center JCPOF Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action LEU Low-enriched uranium NBC National Broadcasting Company NPT Non- Proliferation Treaty SAVAK Organization of Intelligence and Security of the Country (Sazman-e Etelaat Va Amniat Keshvar). UNSC United Nation Security Council WMD Weapon of Mass Destruction VII Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Chapter One: U.S. - Iran Relations: From Partnership to Mutual Exclusion……..…… 8 1.1. A Glimpse of History about Iran- U.S. Relations Up the 1980’s…………………...…… 9 1.2. The Islamic Revolution in Iran: Causes and Effects……………………….......……….. 51 1.3. U.S. -Iran Diplomacies Following 9/11 Attacks………………………….........……….. 22 Chapter Two: Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions vs. U.S. Opposition……………......…………. 22 2.1. Iran’s Nuclear Program: A Historical Overview………………………….....…………. 22 2.2. The Fuel Swap Deal and Obama’s Letter…………………………………............……. 22 2.3. The Laptop Incident and Iran-IAEA Modalities Agreement………………….......……. 21 2.4. Iran’s Violation of The NPT: Truth or Propaganda? ……………………….………….. 38 Chapter Three: Obama’s New “direct policy” towards Iran and its Outcome............... 46 3.1. The JCPOA between U.S. Conviction and “Israeli” Obstruction…………………… 47 3.2. “Israel’s” Safety Comes First…………………………………………………………… 52 3.3. Obama’s View on Islam and the Islamic Republic of Iran……………..……………… 57 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..……………. 63 Endnotes……………………………………………………………………………….……. 66 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………...……. 67 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………..... 81 1 Introduction During the Cold War the U.S.A and the U.S.S.R as the emerging powers in the aftermath of the Second World War distrusted each other to a high degree. This distrust escalated to reach an exaggerated fear from each other engendering huge effort from each side to implement an unbreakable defense and protection for their spheres of influence. Unfortunately, both powers invested all their efforts to produce and hold nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction. At the beginning, the arms race seemed a great idea, and grace from God for both powers that enabled them to protect themselves. However, within time this turned to become a very reckless endeavor that brings more harm than security, contrary to what was thought. By being produced and hold by only two powers, nuclear arms strained the less strong. Yet the whole world is unsecure with the existence of such weapons. The entire humanity may get involved in a nuclear war just because some people hate each other’s values and ideologies. As a reaction most of western powerful countries tried their best to get an immediate solution to this threat, and the result was to apply a new policy known as Nuclear Disarmament. Nuclear armament took the attention of many governments around the world, but the issue has also generated popular contention around the world. Ironically, the best popular action against nuclear armament was the New York demonstrations of 12 June 1982 that took place in Central Park. The demonstrators called for the end of the arms race and thus of the Cold War conflict. It was the largest anti-Cold War protest in American history. Despite many efforts to reduce nuclear weapons’ possession, more and more countries became eager to start their own nuclear programs to reduce the degree of threat that may be directed to them from some unfriendly nuclear states, as in the case of Iran. 2 By starting its own nuclear program Iran has entered in competition with the world’s powers challenging their rules and restrictions. From U.S. perspective the Iranian nuclear program is a threat to the whole world. Needless to mention that the United States is playing the role of the world’s peace maker and therefore is determined to end by all means Iran’s nuclear program. In this context, the present work has explored the nature of U.S. - Iran relation before and after the Islamic Revolution of 1979 with a focus on President’s Obama “new policy” used to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue. Successive American administrations consider the Iranian nuclear threat as a high priority, but the rhetoric used to describe the Iranian regime and the way used in dealing with it had differed from one president to another.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iran Nuclear Programme: Revisiting the Nuclear Debate
    Journal of Power, Politics & Governance June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-227 ISSN: 2372-4919 (Print), 2372-4927 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Iran Nuclear Programme: Revisiting the Nuclear Debate Khurshid Ahmad Mir1 The trajectory of the nuclear program of Iran dates back to the 1950s. The nuclear programme of Iran was assisted by the west in general and the United States of America in particular as part of the Atoms for Peace program (Roe, 2007). The United States and Western European governments continued to support the Iran's nuclear program continued until the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The revolution of 1979 toppled the Shah of Iran (Iran Affairs, 2006). It was 1957 when Iran and The United States of America signed a civil nuclear co-operation agreement. The agreement was signed as a part of the U.S. Atoms for Peace program. As a confidence building measure Iran signed the Partial nuclear test ban treaty (PTBT) on August 9, 1963: and ratified it on December 23, 1963. And more importantly, in July 1968 Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and latter ratified it. Therefore, there was a marriage between the West and Iran and under the Shah regime, Iran initiated a series of motivated nuclear projects that relied on assistance and backing from the United States of America and Europe. The support from the west made it possible for Iran to launch a nuclear programme which presently seems a global concern. The revolution of 1979 in Iran brought a tremendous change in the policies of the Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation: Perception and Reality Jacques E
    ROUNDTABLE: NONPROLIFERATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation: Perception and Reality Jacques E. C. Hymans* uclear weapons proliferation is at the top of the news these days. Most recent reports have focused on the nuclear efforts of Iran and North N Korea, but they also typically warn that those two acute diplomatic headaches may merely be the harbingers of a much darker future. Indeed, foreign policy sages often claim that what worries them most is not the small arsenals that Tehran and Pyongyang could build for themselves, but rather the potential that their reckless behavior could catalyze a process of runaway nuclear proliferation, international disorder, and, ultimately, nuclear war. The United States is right to be vigilant against the threat of nuclear prolifer- ation. But such vigilance can all too easily lend itself to exaggeration and overreac- tion, as the invasion of Iraq painfully demonstrates. In this essay, I critique two intellectual assumptions that have contributed mightily to Washington’s puffed-up perceptions of the proliferation threat. I then spell out the policy impli- cations of a more appropriate analysis of that threat. The first standard assumption undergirding the anticipation of rampant pro- liferation is that states that abstain from nuclear weapons are resisting the dictates of their narrow self-interest—and that while this may be a laudable policy, it is also an unsustainable one. According to this line of thinking, sooner or later some external shock, such as an Iranian dash for the bomb, can be expected to jolt many states out of their nuclear self-restraint.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Strategy Vis-À-Vis the Us Foreign Policy in the Iran Nuclear Deal
    ULB- LUISS Double Degree Master’s Degree in International Relations, Major in: Political violence and Security Practices ( ULB) Geopolitical Scenarios and Political risk (LUISS) Master’s dissertation: THE ISRAELI STRATEGY VIS-À-VIS THE US FOREIGN POLICY IN THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL SUPERVISORS Prof. Christian Olsson (ULB) Prof. Giuseppe Scognamiglio (LUISS) CANDIDATE Michela Muscau (638382) CO-SUPERVISOR Prof. Gregory Alegi (LUISS) 0 1 Alla mia famiglia, A Davide e a mio Padre, a chi non smette di credere. 2 TABLE OF CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT .......................................................................................................................................................... II ACRONYMS/ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. ........................................................................................................................... III SUMMARY. ............................................................................................................................................................................. I INTRODUCTION. .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: PREMISES AND THEORY. .......................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY. ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Iran's Perilous Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons
    INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY REPORT Highlights of Iran’s Perilous Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons By David Albright with Sarah Burkhard and the Good ISIS Team August 25, 2021 Iran’s Perilous Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons chronicles the Islamic Republic of Iran’s effort to acquire nuclear weapons. It started slowly, building to a crash nuclear weapons program in the early 2000s to create five nuclear weapons and an industrial complex to produce many more. Under international pressure, fearful of military attack, the program was driven to downsize and deeper secrecy. Nonetheless, Iran remains on the brink of becoming a nuclear weapons power; its nuclear material production capabilities stronger than ever, its weaponization capabilities lurking under the surface. But just how close did Iran get to nuclear weapons during its crash program and how close is it today? Up until the events of a cold, clear night in January 2018, the world could only guess. In a dramatic nighttime raid, the Israeli Foreign Intelligence Service Mossad broke into a warehouse in Tehran and seized a large cache of documents detailing Iran’s darkest and long- denied secret. The Amad Plan, the codename for its crash nuclear weapons program, was far larger and made much more progress than previously known. Containing many top secret details, the seized documents offer unprecedented insights into Iran’s progress—and the hurdles it faced in building nuclear weapons. With what Iran learned about building nuclear weapons during the Amad Plan, combined with its subsequent accomplishments, the Islamic Republic has developed a sophisticated capability to make nuclear weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mahnaz Afkhami Oral History Content Summary Track 1
    Mahnaz Afkhami Oral History Content Summary Track 1 [duration: 1:15:04] [Session one: 5 January 2013] [00:00] Mahnaz Afkhami [MA] Born Kerman, Iran to farming family. Description of division of responsibility within extended family. Describes household and communal living with all family in one compound of separate houses, coming together at mealtimes. Description of mealtimes with grandfather at head of dining cloth, youngest at opposite end. Evocative description of kitchen set apart from living areas and emerging platters of food, served by grandmother. Explanation of private section of household and outer areas used for greeting visitors, business, formalities, predominantly by men. Grandparents’death bringing change with each house entertaining individually. [05:08] Remarks on speed of change consistent with change in country after Second World War. Describes intermingling of agricultural workers with household members. Describes donkeys carrying fruits from harvest, then modernisation. Describes city of Kerman, houses side by side each with garden, fruit trees. Describes characteristics of pistachio trees. Describes attendance of Zoroastrian school despite family being Sheikhi, Shi’ite branch of Islam. Head of Sheikhis, head of MA’s family with belief underpinning daily affairs without observing all religious practices. Reflects on enjoyment of school atmosphere and household full of children to play with, including servant component, MA among youngest, eldest of three in immediate family. [10:29] Divorce of parents, MA age 11, move to Tehran with mother and grandmother. Describes mother, from intellectual, academically oriented Nafisi family, among first women to attend university in Iran. Mother abandoning university studies to marry. Mentions grandmother single mother supporting herself through tailoring business.
    [Show full text]
  • Masaryk University, Brno
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY, BRNO Faculty of Social Studies Department of International Relations and European Studies Political influence of Iran in the Middle East after 2003 Bachelor‟s thesis Author: Oleg Kuznetsov (UČO 330969) MVZ-EVS 2013 Supervisor: PhDr. Pavel Pšeja, Ph.D. Brno 2013 I hereby declare that this thesis I submit for assessment is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Date: Signature 2 Acknowledgment: As the author of this thesis, first of all I would like to thank my supervisor PhDr. Pavel Pšeja Ph.D. for his patience, help, and advices during writing this work. I would like to acknowledge my family for giving me moral support during writing the thesis. I also would like to acknowledge Ms. Shahira Amin and Rohit Jobanputra for their support, kindness and friendship. 3 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 I) Iran’s overview ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Iran’s political system and overview of the country ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mantle of the Prophet: Religion and Politics in Iran Pdf Free Download
    THE MANTLE OF THE PROPHET: RELIGION AND POLITICS IN IRAN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Roy Mottahedeh | 416 pages | 01 Dec 2008 | Oneworld Publications | 9781851686162 | English | London, United Kingdom The Mantle of the Prophet: Religion and Politics in Iran PDF Book The fire started outside three entrance doors to the main hall after the attackers allegedly dropped a match into the petrol. Instead it follows the intellectual life of a boy of a traditional mullah family from his childhood in the 40s of the 20th century through his education and up to the revolution of This book examines the life and thought of Ahmad Riza Khan - , the legendary leader of the 20th-century Ahl-e Sunnat movement, who represented a strong tendency in South Asian Islam which is sufi, ritualistic, intercessionary, and hierarchical in It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. Share Share. According to Middle East expert Daniel L. Our membership in ETAS has temporarily doubled our digital collections, adding 3 million additional items. You know the saying: There's no time like the present While in prison, Ali had come "close to despair, and he thanked God The true story of a young mullah, his life in the sacred shrine city of Qom, and the dramatic events of the Revolution, this enthralling account paints a vivid picture of contemporary Iran, while providing a panoramic survey of Muslim, Shi'ite and Persian culture from the Middle Ages to the current day. Read an excerpt of this book! He was elected a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Council on Foreign Relations and has served as a series editor for several academic publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Newspaper for Month of June 2008 Issue
    Sarbazan Organization for Support of the Families of the Unsung Hero's Members of the Iranian Imperial Armed Forces www.sarbazan.com , [email protected] , [email protected] , P.O Box 16166 Beverly Hills, CA 90209, US ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ IN THE NAME OF MY FATHER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We never give-up, never surrender, and we must go home, it is our destiny. We are proud Iranian, we will defeat our enemy and will prevail our enemy as our parents did, and we shall do it. Index 1. Dedicated from page 2-7 2. History of Monarchy in Iran Zamin from page 7-8 3. Annually 40 Tones of Uranium is Consumed by Iranian from page 8-9 4. One Factor of 1979 Riot in Iran from page 9-16 5. The Islamic Republic in Iran is an Illegitimate State from page 16-18 6. History of Nuclear Proliferation in Iran. Part ½ from page 19-20 7. Memoirs of a Soldier page 20 8. Behind Every Successful Man, There Is a Strong Woman from page 21-22 9. Feeling Pain page 22 10. Obituary page 22 11. Putting Smile on Your Face page 23 Page 1 of 23 Newspaper for month of June 2008 Issue Dedicated: This month’s paper is dedicated to Unsung Heroes that they faced cruelty of Marxist- Islamist riot of 1979 and their families felt huge losses in their life and nothing would be able to illustrate their excruciating pain that they have been going through in this life. 1. 1979 Jun 01 Hamzehlouieyan Ali Captain Shahsavar Execution 2. 1979 Jun 01 Kordbacheh Abbas Private-Army Yazd Execution 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian Government Policy on the Iranian Nuclear Program for Energy
    INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY ON THE IRANIAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM FOR ENERGY By YAYAN FIRMANSYAH ID No. 016201000071 A thesis presented to the Faculty of International Relations, Communication and Law President University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for Bachelor’s Degree in International Relations Specialization in Diplomacy 2014 THESIS ADVISER RECOMMENDATION LETTER This thesis entitled “Indonesian Government Policy on the Iranian Nuclear Program for Energy” prepared and submitted by Yayan Firmansyah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in International Relations in the School of International Relations, Communications and Law, President University, has been reviewed and found to have satisfied the requirements for a thesis fit to be examined. I therefore recommend this thesis for Oral Defense. Jakarta, Indonesia, January 25th, 2014 Thesis Adviser _______________________________ Dr. Muhammad A.S. Hikam, M.A DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I declare that this thesis entitled “Indonesian Government Policy on the Iranian Nuclear Program for Energy” is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, an original piece of work that has not been submitted, either in whole or in part, to another university to obtain a degree. Jakarta, Indonesia, January 23th 2014. _____________________________ Yayan Firmansyah PANEL OF EXAMINER APPROVAL SHEET The panel of examiners declare that the thesis entitled “Indonesian Policy on Iranian Nuclear Program for Energy” that was submitted by Yayan Firmansyah majoring in International Relations from the Faculty of Business and International Relations was assessed and approved to have passed the Oral Examinations on (February 17th 2014) Hendra Manurung, MA. Chair – Panel of Examiners Prof. Anak Agung Banyu Perwita Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Indeterminate Governmentality: Neoliberal Politics in Revolutionary Iran, 1968-1979 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fm253hw Author Davari, Arash Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Indeterminate Governmentality: Neoliberal Politics in Revolutionary Iran, 1968-1979 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Arash Davari 2016 ã Copyright by Arash Davari 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Indeterminate Governmentality: Neoliberal Politics in Revolutionary Iran, 1968-1979 by Arash Davari Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Kirstie M. McClure, Co-Chair Professor Mark Q. Sawyer, Co-Chair This dissertation situates the emergence of revolutionary resistance in Pahlavi Iran in parallel with the emergence of neoliberal political rationality in the Middle East. In the process, it theorizes neoliberalism anew. Through an engagement with archives of social practice in Iran and its diaspora between 1968 and 1979, neoliberalism is presented as a political rationality that involves rhetorical disavowal at root ¾ what I refer to as indeterminate governmentality. The study employs parallelism as a theoretical construct reflecting the logic of the revolutionary transformation and periodic shift at hand. The disavowals considered include renderings of a collective on individualist terms; formations of solidarity through empathy; and orientations toward order in the production of disorder. The archival material considered includes state documents; activist records, ephemera, and publications; theoretical texts; literature; popular cinema; periodicals; and ethnographic interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Sayı / Issue: 17 TÜRKİYE NEDEN BAŞARILI? Why Turkey Is Thriving
    İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ UYGULAMA GAZETESİ / ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY PERIODICAL JOURNAL 1 Mayıs-1 Haziran 2013 / 1st May – 1st June 2013 nobel Barış AlmAn mucizesinin AmerikA’nın Geleceği tahrip olAn cepheyi darAlTmAk sosyAl Doku Ödüllü Tevekkül sırrı: ArGe Dini ve ToplumsAl YahuDi sorunu, KarmAn istanbul krizler ve bunlArın orta sınıfın krizi Nasıl filisTin AyDın üniversiTesi sonuçlArı ve AmerikAn Gücü sorunu’nA DönüşTü KadrosunA KatılDı The fuTure THE DESTRUCTION OF NarrowInG DoWn THE WINNER OF NOBEL The secreT of The of USA THE SOCIAl TeXTu The fronT PEACE PRIZE, TEVEKKÜL GermAn mırAcle: relIgIous AnD THE CRISIS OF THE hoW The jewIsh kARMAn hAs JOINED r&D THE TeACHING sTAFF socIal crısıs MIDDLE CLASS AnD problem TurneD OF ISTANBUL AyDIN AnD Theır THE POWER OF ınTo The problem of UNIVERSITy consequence s AMERICA PalestIne Klaus Deuser James Petras George Friedman Celal Tahir 02 03 04 06 10 Sayı / Issue: 17 TÜRKİYE NEDEN BAŞARILI? Why Turkey is Thriving Jeffrey D. Sachs EW YORK – Türkiye’ye yaptığım son ziyaret, EW YORK – A recent visit to Turkey reminded son on yıldaki büyük ekonomik başarıyı bana me of its enormous economic successes during the hatırlattı. Ekonomi hızlı bir şekilde büyümüş, last decade. The economy has grown rapidly, in- eşitsizlikN azalıyor ve innovasyon yükselişte. equalityN is declining, and innovation is on the rise. Türkiye’nin başarıları, komşuları düşünüldüğünde, Turkey’s achievements are all the more remarkable when daha fazla dikkate değerdir. Batı komşuları Kıbrıs ve Yu- one considers its neighborhood. Its neighbors to the west, nanistan, euro bölge krizinin merkezindedir. Güneydo- Cyprus and Greece, are at the epicenter of the eurozone cri- ğusunda, neredeyse 400000 mülteciyi Türkiye’ye sü- sis.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Iranian Nuclear Puzzle
    An Arms Control Association Briefing Book Solving the Iranian Nuclear Puzzle February 2013 ACA Research Staff An Arms Control Association Briefing Book Solving the Iranian Nuclear Puzzle February 2013 ACA Research Staff Arms Control Association Research Staff Tom Z. Collina is ACA’s Research Director. He previously served as Director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists and Executive Director of the Institute for Science and International Security. Kelsey Davenport is the Nonproliferation Research Analyst at ACA. She first joined ACA in 2011 as the Herbert Scoville Jr. Peace Fellow. She has worked for a think tank in Jerusalem researching regional security issues and track II diplomatic negotiations and holds a masters degree in peace studies from the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame. Daryl G. Kimball has been Executive Director of ACA since 2001. Previously, he was Executive Director of the Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers, a consortium of 17 of the largest U.S. nongovernmental organizations working on nonproliferation and disarmament, and was Director of Security Programs for Physicians for Social Responsibility. Greg Thielmann joined ACA as Senior Fellow in 2009. He served more than three decades in the executive and legislative branches of government, specializing in political-military and intelligence issues, including as a senior professional staffer of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and Director of the Strategic, Proliferation and Military Affairs Office in the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Acknowledgements The Arms Control Association is grateful for the generous support of our members and donors, without which this report would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]