The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Truth, Justice Or Accountability?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Truth, Justice Or Accountability? THE MIDDLE EAST, BETTER EXPLAINED The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Truth, Justice or Accountability? THE MIDDLE EAST, BETTER EXPLAINED The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Truth, Justice or Accountability? Olga Kavran is a fellow and PhD candidate at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and the Founding Director of IUSTICOM, the first NGO specifically dedicated to communicating justice. From 2010-2020, she was the Head of Outreach and Legacy at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Nadim Shehadi is the executive director of the LAU Headquarters and Academic Center in New York and an Associate Fellow of Chatham House in London. INTRODUCTION up an investigative commission to assist ixteen years ago, on Valentine’s the Lebanese authorities in investigating Day 2005, a massive car bomb these crimes.4 By the end of the year, the exploded outside Beirut’s St. Lebanese demanded more assistance from Georges Hotel, killing Lebanon’s the international community in obtaining former prime minister Rafik justice and accountability, and requested SHariri and 21 other people. Another 269 the establishment of an internationalized people suffered life-altering physical and tribunal. psychological injuries, and the entire Despite vocal opposition from the-then country was traumatized.1 Before the Bei- minority pro-Syrian “March 8 Alliance,” the rut port blast of Aug. 4, 2020,2 this was the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), based biggest explosion to hit a country that had in Leidschendam in the Netherlands, began experienced 15 years of civil war. work four years after the assassination.5 Thus began the STL’s battle for legitimacy and In the aftermath of the assassination, the recognition. Cedar Revolution brought over a million In the years since the issuance of UN people onto the streets, leading ultimately Security Council Resolution 1757 which to the withdrawal of Syrian troops from established the STL, those opposed to the Lebanon after nearly 30 years. Whether tribunal have gone to great lengths to prevent intended or not, Hariri’s assassination it fulfilling its mandate,6 including attacking brought an end to Pax Syriana.3 its investigators and attempting to intimidate However, Hariri’s murder was not the witnesses.7 Many, only assassination to have been committed In January 2008, a car bomb killed Wissam however, had in that year — over a dozen other critics or Eid, the Lebanese investigator who is widely little idea as to opponents of Syrian domination had been credited with major breakthroughs in the the tribunal’s attacked or killed in 2004 and 2005. technical aspects of the investigation into the actual The international community reacted, as 2004-2005 terrorist attacks, and in October findings it often does, by issuing a number of UN 2012 another car bomb killed Wissam and chose to Security Council resolutions and setting Al-Hassan, head of Lebanon’s internal ignore them intelligence agency, who had led the initial Former PM Rafik international tribunal with jurisdiction over Hariri was a very well investigation into the assassination of Hariri.8 protected man with terrorism and the first to conduct trials in Ultimately, its opponents failed in both private security the absence of the accused (but with the and that provided by undermining the work of the STL but the state of Lebanon. participation of counsel appointed to conduct succeeded in damaging its reputation among (FILE/Getty Images) their defense.) For the first time in the region, the Lebanese. Through sustained media the tribunal introduced the principle of campaigns the tribunal was portrayed as accountability for political crimes, which “an American-Zionist” plot against the today is needed more than ever. “Resistance” on the one hand and, on the Despite tough initial negotiations at other, as ineffective because it neither the UN Security Council, a number of prosecuted nor convicted Hezbollah or states cooperated with the Independent Syria.9 International Investigation Commission So, when the tribunal issued its judgment which preceded the STL, and 29 countries on Aug. 18, 2020, convicting Hezbollah voluntarily contributed to the tribunal’s member Salim Jamil Ayyash but acquitting funding. his three co-defendants, some celebrated At the local level in Lebanon, the STL did the “exoneration,” while most decided the deliver a significant part of “the truth” that process had failed because it “convicted only people had sought after the assassination of one person.” Many, however, had little idea as Hariri. However, due primarily to unrealistic to the tribunal’s actual findings and chose to expectations and the lack of consensus on the ignore them. objectives of truth, justice and accountability, STL’s critics in Lebanon claim that the THE STL DID tribunal delivered too little too late and at AND STILL CAN REINFORCE huge cost, with several periods of instability INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE and paralysis. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon was the THE MIDDLE EAST, BETTER EXPLAINED first of its kind. It represents a successful THE TRIBUNAL LAID multilateral effort to reinforce a rules- OUT FACTS THAT based international order. It is also the first CANNOT BE IGNORED Rather than focusing on what the STL 2,641 pages of important and judicially tested could not and did not do, its stakeholders in facts about Lebanon’s recent past.10 Lebanon and internationally would benefit For the first Former PM Hariri was a well-protected from an earnest examination of the judgment time in the man, with both private security and that and the process that led to the tribunal’s region, the provided by the state of Lebanon. During creation and governed its conduct. Such an tribunal 415 days in court, the judges heard from 297 examination would have to include a clear introduced the witnesses, received 171,000 pages of exhibits, understanding of the system of international principle of and concluded that the careful planning and criminal justice and its limits, as well as preparation required to assassinate someone accountability the specific restrictions placed on the STL. as closely protected as Hariri involved at These are essential prerequisites for properly for political least 10 and possibly many more individuals, evaluating the importance of the judgment crimes who used four different interconnected, issued on Aug. 18, 2020 and identifying coordinated and covert mobile phone possible avenues by which the judgment networks. and the facts it established can be used to On the afternoon of that fateful Valentine’s take Lebanon down the path of justice and Day, the criminals also attempted to divert accountability. attention from themselves by creating a false Disappointment with the judgment is based claim of responsibility. They kidnapped, on a combination of unrealistic expectations, filmed and then disappeared a young man a lack of understanding of the tribunal’s by the name of Abu Adass. In the video, he rigorous procedures, and legitimate concerns claimed responsibility for the assassination about the narrowness of its mandate and the of Hariri on behalf of a nonexistent militant length of time it took to reach its judgment — group. nine years from the indictment and 15 years The judgment provides details of this after the crime, at an estimated cost of around carefully planned crime — obtaining $700 million. detailed knowledge of Hariri’s movements, In view of the scale of suffering during the his convoy, its personnel and his usual Lebanese civil war, for which no one has ever position within it; establishing closed mobile been held accountable, and the dozens of networks for communications between those political assassinations throughout Lebanon’s with a role in the plot; choosing a method history, it was indeed difficult to argue that of assassination; obtaining the vehicle used the assassination of one man warranted such for the killing; picking a suitable site for an an expensive and complex legal instrument. explosion; selecting a manner of detonation, This added to the unrealistic expectations including recruiting the suicide bomber; that the tribunal would address much broader procuring the explosives; and setting up the issues of states and groups which regularly claim of responsibility, including arranging interfere with and undermine the authority Adass’ role in it. of the Lebanese nation. This is also evidenced The judgment also describes the political by the little-known fact that the tribunal’s situation in Lebanon leading up to Hariri’s victims’ liaison officer received many calls assassination and concludes that the attack from victims of the civil war and other was intended to resonate throughout the conflicts in Lebanon requesting assistance in country and the region, and that its intended achieving some measure of justice — justice effects were not just confined to Hariri’s that the tribunal could never provide. supporters but were designed to destabilize In 2005, after the Hariri assassination, Lebanon generally. Lebanese protesters demanded “the truth.” The judges also concluded that the attack In simpler and less controversial terms, they did not occur in a political or historical wanted to know who did it. vacuum, and that Syria and Hezbollah may On Aug. 18, 2020, the STL provided the have had motives to eliminate Hariri and his answer — the terrorist attack that killed political allies.11 22 people, injured 226 and devastated a In fact, the judges stated that the evidence significant part of Beirut was carried out by THE MIDDLE EAST, BETTER EXPLAINED presented was sufficient
Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Rise of the Lebanese Hezbollah
    A report on recent developments in the Middle East and the Muslim world nderstanding the Rise of the Lebanese UHezbollah The 1985–2000 South Lebanon Security Zone Conflict Introduction The fruit of foreign interference in Lebanon: Hezbollah emerges The “Party of God” navigates troubled domestic waters Hezbollah’s military performance in south Lebanon: Resilience and hybrid warfare Conclusion Jumada I - II, 1437 23 February - March, 2016 © KFCRIS, 2016 This edition of Masarat is the latest publication of the King Faisal Research Center's new initiative: The Middle East Strategy Project. The aim of this project is to conduct in-depth research and analysis that falls within the scope of regional grand strategy of security and defense. In light of the recent ISSN: 1658-6972 events in the Syrian Arab Republic, the study will focus on Issue No. 23 - 07/04/2016 examining the ongoing turmoil, study the resulting regional L.D. No: 1437/2868 repercussions unfolding across the Levant, and analyze the policy objectives of the local, sub-state, and international actors. February - March, 2016 - Jumada I - II, 1437 3 hile pundits attribute the Damascene Wregime’s resilience in the ongoing Syrian conflict largely to the Russian intervention since September 2015, the sudden emergence of the Lebanese Hezbollah on Syrian turf since 2013 has arguably proven to be no less valuable for Bashar al-Assad’s continuous grip on power. This report showcases, by virtue of a case study, a detailed account of Hezbollah’s internal adaptability in transforming from a loose Khomeinist guerilla movement in its early stages into a “state within a state” in Lebanon.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire
    Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire: Fault-Lines, Resilience and Possible Futures Ishac Diwan, Paris Sciences et Lettres Youssef Chaitani, UN ESCWA Working Paper for Discussion The purpose of this paper is to examine the weaknesses and strengths of Lebanon amidst the tensions created by the Syrian conflict that started in 2011. Lebanon’s sectarian governance system has been over 150 years in the making. But the Syrian fire next door, which has taken an increasing sectarian nature, is likely to burn for a long time. With such dire prospects, what is the fate of Lebanon’s governance system? Will it lead the country inexorably towards civil strife? The Lebanese governance system could be described as a horizontal deal among communal oligarchs, supported by vertical organizations within each community. While oligarchs have changed over time, the system itself survived devastating civil wars, endured extensive global and regional influences, and was also undeterred by the projection of power by many external forces, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Syria, Iran and Israel. What are the forces at work that make the Lebanese governance system both resilient and resistant to change? In the paper, we use as an analytical framework, which is introduced in section one, the model of limited orders developed by Douglas North and his associates. In section two, we argue that the Syrian civil war is likely to be long lasting. Section three examines the weaknesses and fault-lines of the Lebanese system in light of the Syrian war. Section four explores the factors that continue to contribute to the strength and resilience of Lebanon in spite of the rise in extremist Islamic militancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes
    Number 21 — August 2014 RESEARCH NOTES THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY MINDING THE HOME FRONT Hezbollah in Lebanon Mona Alami riggered by the March 2011 uprising against the egie’s online journal Sada, have addressed Hezbol- regime of Bashar al-Assad, the civil war in Syria lah’s involvement in Syria.1 However, this paper goes Thas been marked by the extensive military involve- beyond the emphasis of such reports—which often ment of Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based Shiite Mus- discuss the effects of Hezbollah’s war involvement on lim militant group and political party. Although con- the regional power balance and Lebanon’s economics sidered a terrorist organization by the United States, and security—by also probing the party’s relationship the “Party of God” is embraced by Lebanon’s Shiite with its Lebanese constituency. population as a resistance movement and represented Alongside the experts named in this report, some within the Lebanese government. Backed by Iran and forty Lebanese Shiites were interviewed, including Syria, Hezbollah has an extensive security apparatus fifteen from southern Lebanon, twelve from Beirut, and a wide-reaching social services network. Hez- ten from the largely Shiite Beqa Valley, and two Shi- bollah has always framed itself according to its resis- ite party members, in addition to security sources and tance against Israel and its commitment to moumana Hezbollah fighters. The interviews were conducted (securing immunity from Western influence) in the off the record due to security concerns. A request for Middle East, alongside Syria and Iran. In recent years, an interview with Hezbollah’s public relations arm especially since the end of the Pax Syriana—a period was declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire Fault-Lines, Resilience and Possible Futures
    Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire Fault-Lines, Resilience and Possible Futures by Youssef Chaitani Ishac Diwan Outline What are we trying to do? I. Conceptual Framework II. Why the Syrian War will Last and impact on Lebanon III. Weaknesses of the Lebanese System IV. Lebanese Strengths and Resilience V. Comparing Future Scenarios “In a country like ours, composed of minorities that are already approximately equal and equally jealous of their rights, where no single element can hope to constitute a dominant majority, where there can be no question of a dictatorial regime – the only possible peace is one arrived at by consent, based on understanding and cooperation, on a state of Charles Helou, Lebanese President equilibrium.” (1941) (1964 – 1970) 1. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK What is “Sectarian, Ethnic, Communal”? • group wt shared sense of identity (cultural tradition, language, religion, historical narratives etc.) reinforced by social relations of kinship that tends to be stable (Geertz 1967) • Formation of social groups and emergence Manipulation of culture of communal identities as responses to (histories of oppression, Generate inequalities martyrdom) in a manner economic and political conditions, and hence Social - or are discriminatory that becomes politicized towards certain groups as inherently dynamic (Horowitz 1985 and and exclusionary Economic Anderson 2006) • Historical events can strengthen or even create a sense of communal identity. Political actors, often Tensions/ State Cultural with interests of their own, may manipulate or Identity
    [Show full text]
  • WARS and WOES a Chronicle of Lebanese Violence1
    The Levantine Review Volume 1 Number 1 (Spring 2012) OF WARS AND WOES A Chronicle of Lebanese Violence1 Mordechai Nisan* In the subconscious of most Lebanese is the prevalent notion—and the common acceptance of it—that the Maronites are the “head” of the country. ‘Head’ carries here a double meaning: the conscious thinking faculty to animate and guide affairs, and the locus of power at the summit of political office. While this statement might seem outrageous to those unversed in the intricacies of Lebanese history and its recent political transformations, its veracity is confirmed by Lebanon’s spiritual mysteries, the political snarls and brinkmanship that have defined its modern existence, and the pluralistic ethno-religious tapestry that still dominates its demographic makeup. Lebanon’s politics are a clear representation of, and a response to, this seminal truth. The establishment of modern Lebanon in 1920 was the political handiwork of Maronites—perhaps most notable among them the community’s Patriarch, Elias Peter Hoyek (1843-1931), and public intellectual and founder of the Alliance Libanaise, Daoud Amoun (1867-1922).2 In recognition of this debt, the President of the Lebanese Republic has by tradition been always a Maronite; the country’s intellectual, cultural, and political elites have hailed largely from the ranks of the Maronite community; and the Patriarch of the Maronite Church in Bkirke has traditionally held sway as chief spiritual and moral figure in the ceremonial and public conduct of state affairs. In the unicameral Lebanese legislature, the population decline of the Christians as a whole— Maronites, Greek Orthodox, Catholics, and Armenians alike—has not altered the reality of the Maronites’ pre-eminence; equal confessional parliamentary representation, granting Lebanon’s Christians numerical parity with Muslims, still defines the country’s political conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Elite Politics in Postwar Lebanon
    Pax Syriana Modern Intellectual and Political History of the Middle East Mehrzad Boroujerdi, Series Editor Other titles in Modern Intellectual and Political History of the Middle East Britain and the Iranian Constitutional Revolution of 1906–1911: Foreign Policy, Imperialism, and Dissent Mansour Bonakdarian Class and Labor in Iran: Did the Revolution Matter? Farhad Nomani and Sohrab Behdad Democracy and Civil Society in Arab Political Thought: Transcultural Possibilities Michaelle L. Browers The Essentials of Iba¯d¯ı Islam ˙ Valerie J. Hoffman Globalization and the Muslim World: Culture, Religion, and Modernity Birgit Schaebler and Leif Stenberg, eds. God and Juggernaut: Iran’s Intellectual Encounter with Modernity Farzin Vahdat A Guerrilla Odyssey: Modernization, Secularism, Democracy, and the Fadai Period of National Liberation in Iran, 1971–1979 Peyman Vahabzadeh The International Politics of the Persian Gulf Mehran Kamrava, ed. The Kurdish Quasi-State: Development and Dependency in Post–Gulf War Iraq Denise Natali The Urban Social History of the Middle East, 1750–1950 Peter Sluglett, ed. Pax Syriana Elite Politics in Postwar Lebanon Rola el-Husseini With a Foreword by Ryan Crocker Syracuse University Press Copyright © 2012 by Syracuse University Press Syracuse, New York 13244-5290 All Rights Reserved First Edition 2012 12 13 14 15 16 17 6 5 4 3 2 1 ∞ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. For a listing of books published and distributed by Syracuse University Press, visit our website at SyracuseUniversityPress.syr.edu. ISBN: 978-0-8156-3304-4 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data El-Husseini, Rola.
    [Show full text]
  • Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations
    UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL OF Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations ISSUE XI UNDERGRADUATE JOURNAL OF Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations ISSUE XI Staff & Credits EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Ofelia Tychon EDITORS Farida Abdelmeguied Charlie Gordon Salwa Iqbal Ritika Lal Christopher Legerme Mohamed Serageldin Catharine Solomon ILLUSTRATOR Meagan Jahrles LAYOUT Catharine Solomon THANK YOU Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations Students’ Union Arts & Sciences Students’ Union 2 Table of Contents 5 Letter from Editor-in-Chief 6 A Study of the Royal Ontario Museum’s Shabti of Senkamanisken Evelyn Hayes 14 Sounds Like Multiculturalism: “Paramount”, Home, and Consuming Diversity Ahmed Hegazy 20 Can the Lebanese Phalange Be Considered a Fascist Movement? A Critical Examination Using Stanley G. Payne’s Typology of Fascism Callum Hutchinson 38 Coptic vs. Christian: A Question of Cultural Identity in the Medieval Cemeteries of Lower Nubia Jason Silvestri 50 Cultural Consciousness and the Evolution of Islamism in the Iranian Revolution of 1979 Nazanin Zarepour 3 4 Letter from Editor-in-Chief Dear Reader, I am honoured to present to you the eleventh edition of the Undergraduate Journal of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations. This year marks the Journal’s 15 year anniversary. The Journal is proud to continue to provide a platform to showcase the intellectual depth of the undergraduate students of the Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations. Spanning three millennia, this edition’s articles embody the diversity of the Department’s ancient, medieval and modern streams. They were written by your fellow University of Toronto undergraduate students, and I hope their work inspires your continued interest in the field. I would like to especially thank the Journal’s talented team, without whom this edition would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis in Lebanon: a Test of Consociational Theory
    THE CRISIS IN LEBANON: A TEST OF CONSOCIATIONAL THEORY BY ROBERT G. CHALOUHI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1978 Copyright 1978 by Robert G. Chalouhi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my thanks to the members of my committee, especially to my adviser, Dr. Keith Legg, to whom I am deeply indebted for his invaluable assistance and guidance. This work is dedicated to my parents, brother, sister and families for continued encouragement and support and great confidence in me; to my parents-in-law for their kindness and concern; and especially to my wife Janie for her patient and skillful typing of this manuscript and for her much- needed energy and enthusiasm. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1 Applicability of the Model 5 Problems of System Change 8 Assumption of Subcultural Isolation and Uniformity 11 The Consociational Model Applied to Lebanon 12 Notes 22 CHAPTER II THE BEGINNINGS OF CONSOCIATIONALISM: LEBANON IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. 25 The Phoenicians 27 The Birth of Islam 29 The Crusaders 31 The Ottoman Empire 33 Bashir II and the Role of External Powers 38 The Qaim Maqamiya 41 The Mutasarrif iyah: Confessional Representation Institutionalized. 4 6 The French Mandate, 1918-1943: The Consolidation of Consociational Principles 52 Notes 63 CHAPTER III: THE OPERATION OF THE LEBANESE POLITICAL SYSTEM 72 Confessionalism and Proportionality: Nominal Actors and Formal Rules . 72 The National Pact 79 The Formal Institutions 82 Political Clientelism: "Real" Actors and Informal Rules The Politics of Preferment and Patronage 92 Notes 95 CHAPTER IV: CONSOCIATIONALISM PUT TO THE TEST: LEBANON IN THE FIFTIES AND SIXTIES.
    [Show full text]
  • Push-Pull Hezbollah: the New York Times and the Washington Post News Coverage of Three Israel-Lebanon Conflicts
    Push-Pull Hezbollah: The New York Times and the Washington Post News Coverage of Three Israel-Lebanon Conflicts (1996, 2000, 2006) A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Abhinav K. Aima August 2019 © 2019 Abhinav K. Aima. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Push-Pull Hezbollah: The New York Times and the Washington Post News Coverage of Three Israel-Lebanon Conflicts (1996, 2000, 2006) by ABHINAV K. AIMA has been approved for the E.W. Scripps School of Journalism and the Scripps College of Communication by Robert Stewart Professor of Journalism Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii Abstract AIMA, ABHINAV K., Ph.D., August 2019, Journalism Push-Pull Hezbollah: The New York Times and the Washington Post News Coverage of Three Israel-Lebanon Conflicts (1996, 2000, 2006) Director of Dissertation: Robert Stewart This content analysis of attributed sources in the 1996, 2000, and 2006 news coverage of Israel’s military actions in Lebanon shows a “Late Breaking Foreign Policy” effect Warren P. Strobel cites in his work, wherein media “Push” forward with reliance on government sources and allies in conflicts, but “Pull” back after setbacks. Israel dominated news sources in The New York Times and Washington Post, but there was significant increase in attributions to Lebanese sources due to rising civilian casualties in each conflict. iii Dedication This work is dedicated to Terry Anderson, my teacher, and Sourabh Narang, my friend. iv Acknowledgments I’m thankful for the effort, attention, and guidance provided to me by my Dissertation Committee Chair Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Investigation of Power and Ideology Through the Special Tribunal for Lebanon
    A Critical Investigation of Power and Ideology through the Special Tribunal for Lebanon Alexander Mark Baxter A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2019 This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed in the owner(s) of the Intellectual Property Rights. Contents Table of Figures .................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ iv Acronyms............................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Context and Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 1 Approach of the thesis .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire Fault-Lines, Resilience and Possible Futures
    Lebanon in the Syrian Quagmire Fault-Lines, Resilience and Possible Futures by Youssef Chaitani Ishac Diwan Harvard, April 29, 2014 Outline What are we trying to do? I. Conceptual Framework II. Why the Syrian War will Last and impact on Lebanon III. Weaknesses of the Lebanese System IV. Lebanese Strengths and Resilience V. Comparing Future Scenarios “In a country like ours, composed of minori6es that are already approximately equal and equally jealous of their rights, where no single element can hope to cons6tute a dominant majority, where there can be no ques6on of a dictatorial regime – the only possible peace is one arrived at by consent, based on understanding and cooperaon, on a state of Charles Helou, Lebanese President equilibrium.” (1941) (1964 – 1970) 1. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK What is “Sectarian, Ethnic, Communal”? • group wt shared sense of iden6ty (cultural tradi6on, language, religion, historical narraves etc.) reinforced by social relaons of kinship that tends to be stable (Geertz 1967) • Formaon of social groups and emergence Manipulaon of culture of communal iden66es as responses to (histories of oppression, Generate inequali6es economic and poli6cal condi6ons, and hence martyrdom) in a manner or are discriminatory that becomes poli6cized Social - towards certain groups as inherently dynamic (Horowitz 1985 and and exclusionary Economic Anderson 2006) • Historical events can strengthen or even create a sense of communal iden6ty. Poli6cal actors, oXen Tensions State Cultural with interests of their own, may manipulate or /Iden6ty
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing and Destructing the Peace: Models of International Engagement in Post-Conflict States Colin Churchill Macalester College, [email protected]
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Political Science Honors Projects Political Science Department 5-1-2019 Constructing and Destructing the Peace: Models of International Engagement in Post-Conflict States Colin Churchill Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Eastern European Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Churchill, Colin, "Constructing and Destructing the Peace: Models of International Engagement in Post-Conflict States" (2019). Political Science Honors Projects. 83. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors/83 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Constructing and Destructing the Peace Models of International Engagement in Post- Conflict States Colin Churchill Professor Andrew Latham – Political Science 5/1/2019 1 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Literature Review.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]