Navn Sum Utgiver Sum Opphavsmenn Til Bedrift Adresseavisen 217 095
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media. -
Aviser, Vekepresse Og Fagpresse.Pdf
Statistiske analysar 131 Kulturstatistikk 2011 12. Aviser, vekepresse og fagpresse 12.1. Nokre resultat Minkande avisopplag Trenden med nedgang i opplagstala for papiravisene held fram. Samla avisopplag i 2011 var på 2,5 millionar, ein nedgang på 71 000, eller 2,8 prosent frå året før. Frå 2009 til 2010 var fallet noko større, 3,3 prosent. 2011 er det tolvte året på rad med nedgang, og samla nedgang sidan 1998 er 21 prosent (Høst 2012). Sjølv om avisopplaga fell, er det likevel verdt å merke seg at talet på aviser har vore nokolunde stabilt dei siste åra. Ved utgangen av 2011 var det 228 aviser i Noreg. Dette er to aviser fleire enn i 2010. Nesten alle kategoriar aviser har hatt fall i opplagstala, bortsett frå riksspreidde meiningsbêrande aviser og nasjonale fådagarsaviser. Dei fleste åra sidan 2005 har laussalsavisene vore dei store taparane. Samla opplagstal for dei to laussalsavisene i Noreg, Verdens Gang og Dagbladet, var 311 000 i 2011. Samanlikna med 2010 er det ein nedgang på 20 000, eller 6 prosent. Sidan 2005 er opplagstalet for laussalsavisene redusert med nesten 39 prosent. Sjå tabell 12.4. Figur 12.1. Aviser. Opplagstal, etter type.1 2005-2011 Aften#2Aften3 2005 2007 2009 2010 2011 Nasjonale fådagarsaviser Lokale vekeaviser Lokale 2-3 dagarsaviser Lokale dagsaviser, nr. 2 Leiande lokale dagsaviser Riksspreidde meiningsbêrande aviser Nr.2-aviser i store byar Storbyaviser#3Storbyaviser 2 Laussalsaviser 0 200 400 600 800 1 000 Opplag i 1 000 1 Ei avis som før 2007 blei rekna som avis, er ikkje lenger med i statistikken. -
Bakgrunnen for Media Norge
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Camilla Fosse Knut Tornes Helge Østbye Bakgrunnen for Media Norge Rapport til Rådet for anvendt medieforskning (RAM) Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap Universitetet i Bergen juni 2010 1 © Forfatterne ISBN 978-82-8033-030-7 Rapporten er også lagt ut i BORA (Bergen Open Research Archive) for gratis nedlasting: https://bora.uib.no/ Henvendelser til: [email protected] Helge Østbye Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap Boks 7801 5020 Bergen 2 Innhold: Forord 5 1. Introduksjon 7 2. Frykten for eierkonsentrasjon i mediene 13 3. Schibsted-sfæren 25 4. Ideen om Media Norge 33 5. Eierne behandler fusjonen: «… and then they were four» 55 6. Hvem skal stanse gorillaen? 67 7. Stoffutveksling 2008 – 2009 93 8. Avslutning 109 Referanser 111 3 4 Forord Prosjektet ble etablert på oppfordring fra Rådet for anvendt medieforskning (RAM), og med finansiering fra Rådet. RAM er får sine midler fra Kultur- departementet og er administrert av Medietilsynet. Oppdraget gikk til Helge Østbye ved Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap (Universitetet i Bergen). Camilla Fosse leverte i 2008 en masteroppgave i medievitenskap med tittelen Historien om Media Norge . En del av materialet ble videre bearbeidet i et bokkapittel i Martin Eide (red.): Journalistiske nyorienteringer (2009) Knut Tornes leverte i 2009 en masteroppgave i medievitenskap med tittelen Media Norge, samarbeid og mangfold. Disse tre arbeidene er brukt i denne rapporten. I den grad det i rapporten hentes saksframstillinger, sitater fra kilder, etc. fra disse arbeidene, skjer det som oftest uten nærmere henvisninger til det aktuelle arbeidet. -
Komiteer Og Utvalg Pr 1
KOMITEER OG UTVALG PR 1. MAI 2019 Styrer MBL Hovedstyre: Tove Nedreberg, Adresseavisen (17-19) Stig Finslo, Amedia (17-19) Siv Juvik Tveitnes, Schibsted (18-20) Nils Gauslaa, Agderposten (18-20) Victoria Schultz, Amedia (17-19) Pål Nedregotten, Amedia (17-19) Bård Skaar Viken, Schibsted Norge (18-20) Tomas Myrbostad, TV 2 (18-20) Hanne Haugsgjerd, Dagbladet/Aller Media (17-19) Per Magne Tveiten, Mentor Medier (17-19) Axel Walø, Egmont Publishing (18-20) Grethe Malkmus, VG (18-20) Varamedlemmer (i rekkefølge) Trond Sundnes, Dagens Næringsliv (18-20) Stig Jacobsen, Mediehuset iTromsø (17-19) Eirik Hoff Lysholm, Dagsavisen (17-19) Torunn Pettersen, Bonnier Media (17-19) Ingrid Kløve-Graue, Hordaland Bladdrift (18-20) Marit Skog, Harstad Tidende Gruppen (18-20) Leder: Tove Nedreberg Nestleder: Stig Finslo Arbeidsutvalg: Tove Nedreberg, Adresseavisen Stig Finslo, Amedia Siv Juvik Tveitnes, Schibsted Norge Per Magne Tveiten, Mentor Medier Tomas Myrbostad, TV 2 Valgkomite for årsmøtet 2019: Medlemmer: 1. Harald Jacobsen, Schibsted Norge 2. Harald H. Rise, Polaris 3. Kjersti Moe, Egmont Publishing 4. Pål Eskås, Amedia 5. Sarah Willand, TV2 6. Ernst A. Eik, Jærbladet/Nordsjø Media 7. Anna B. Jenssen, Morgenbladet 1 Personlige varamedlemmer: 1. Ann Mari Ågotnes, Schibsted Norge 2. Per Olav Monseth, Polaris Media 3. Ingeborg Heldal, Aller Media 4. Ann Baekken, Amedia 5. Øivind Johannesen, TV2 6. Øyvind Klausen, Agderposten 7. Irene Halvorsen, Vårt Land NHOs Representantskap Tove Nedreberg, Adresseavisen Vararepresentant: Stig Finslo, Amedia NHOs Generalforsamling Siv Juvik Tveitnes, Schibsted Norge Nils Gauslaa, Agderposten Vararepresentanter: Tomas Myrbostad, TV 2 Per Magne Tveiten, Mentor Medier Analyse og utvikling Markedsforum Mandat: MBLs markedsforum skal gi strategiske råd til hovedstyret om hvordan markedsområdets utfordringer og muligheter kan løses og utvikles fremover, særlig med tanke på å identifisere de områder der samarbeid mellom medlemsbedriftene er formålstjenlig. -
Media, Market, State and Politics in Norway
ISSN 1392–0561. INFORMACIJOS MOKSLAI. 2008 47 Media, market, state and politics in Norway Dr. Robert Vaagan Oslo University College, Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information Science PO Box 4, St.Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway Phone: 47 22 45 26 65, fax: 47 22 45 26 05 E-mail: [email protected] The article builds on Hallin & Mancini (2004) who have used a democratic corporatist model to analyze the media markets of several Northern and Central European countries, including Norway. An analysis of the Norwegian media market is presented, focusing on five key issue areas: changes in media usage, financing, technology, ownership and legislation. The analysis partially supports one of the key features of Hallin & Mancini’s model, i.e. the fairly interventionist role of the Norwegian authorities in the media sector. This is nonetheless tempered by the high level of marketization in most issue areas examined. Overall, there is therefore some reason to argue that “market is king” in Norwegian media. Keywords: Norwegian media market, media usage, financing, technology, ownership, legislation, marketization 1. Introduction and microeconomic issues on the supply and the demand side, ranging from international This paper originated in a lecture I gave 18– trade, business strategy, pricing policies, 19 April 2008 at the Baltic-Nordic conference competition, and industrial concentration as BAMR: Setting A Comparative Baltic-Nordic they affect media enterprises and industries Media Research Agenda, held at the Vytautas (Doyle, 2002, p. 2). In this line of analysis Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania. I any given “media market” would include had been invited to speak on the subject of both the supply side – the media industry “Market-led reforms and the media in Nor� and its total output – and the demand side – way”. -
ID-Nummer Aktørnavn 1 ADRESSEAVISEN 2
ID-nummer Aktørnavn 1 ADRESSEAVISEN 2 AFTENPOSTEN 399 AFTENPOSTEN JUNIOR 143 AGDER FLEKKEFJORDS TIDENDE 5 AGDERPOSTEN 6 AKERS AVIS GRORUDDALEN 7 AKERSHUS AMTSTIDENDE 10 ALTAPOSTEN 418 ALVDAL MIDT I VÆLA 11 ANDØYPOSTEN 14 ARBEIDETS RETT 371 ARENDALS TIDENDE 15 ASKER OG BÆRUMS BUDSTIKKE 16 ASKØYVÆRINGEN 17 AURA AVIS 18 AUST AGDER BLAD 397 AVISA HEMNES 419 AVISA LOFOTEN 326 AVISA NORDLAND 158 AVISA SØR-TRØNDELAG 270 AVVIR 19 BERGENSAVISEN (BA) 20 BERGENS TIDENDE 352 BIRKENES-AVISA 181 BLADET VESTERÅLEN 21 BRØNNØYSUNDS AVIS 22 BYGDANYTT 23 BYGDEBLADET 310 BYGDEBLADET RANDABERG OG RENNESØY 24 BYGDEPOSTEN 284 BØ BLAD 25 BØMLO-NYTT 27 DAGBLADET 28 DAGEN 113 DAGENS NÆRINGSLIV 403 DAGENS PERSPEKTIV 26 DAG OG TID 13 DAGSAVISEN 30 DALANE TIDENDE 31 DEMOKRATEN 32 DRAMMENS TIDENDE 316 DRANGEDALSPOSTEN 33 DRIVA 313 DØLEN 34 EIDSVOLD ULLENSAKER BLAD 344 EIKER BLADET 322 ENEBAKK AVIS 35 FANAPOSTEN 245 FINANSAVISEN 38 FINNMARK DAGBLAD 39 FINNMARKEN 37 FINNMARKSPOSTEN 40 FIRDA 43 FIRDAPOSTEN 42 FIRDA TIDEND 311 FISKERIBLADET FISKAREN 271 FJELL-LJOM 44 FJORDABLADET 45 FJORDENES TIDENDE 46 FJORDINGEN 238 FJUKEN 49 FOSNA-FOLKET 375 FRAMTIA 231 FRAMTID I NORD 50 FREDRIKSSTAD BLAD 51 FREMOVER 370 FROLENDINGEN 206 FROSTINGEN 56 FÆDRELANDSVENNEN 335 GAULA 57 GAULDALSPOSTEN 58 GJENGANGEREN 243 GJESDALBUEN 59 GLÅMDALEN 60 GRANNAR 61 GRENDA 62 GRIMSTAD ADRESSETIDENDE 63 GUDBRANDSDØLEN DAGNINGEN 65 HADELAND 66 HALDEN ARBEIDERBLAD 67 HALLINGDØLEN 68 HAMAR ARBEIDERBLAD 393 HAMMERFESTINGEN 72 HARDANGER FOLKEBLAD 73 HARSTAD TIDENDE 74 HAUGESUNDS AVIS 76 HELGELANDS BLAD -
Curb+Your+Enthusiasm.Pdf (585.2Kb)
Curb your enthusiasm: on media communication of bioenergy and the role of the news media in technology diffusion Article published in Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture (2012)6 (4): 512-531. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2012.705309 Curb your enthusiasm: on media communication of bioenergy and the role of the news media in technology diffusion Tomas Moe Skjølsvold There is widespread agreement that the mitigation of climate changes requires societies across the globe to speed up the diffusion of renewable energy technologies. This paper pursues an interest in the diffusion of one such technology: bioenergy. It does so through a study of how bioenergy is covered and communicated in the news media of Norway and Sweden, countries where the diffusion of this technology looks radically different. Mobilizing a domestication perspective, it finds that the news media in the two countries ascribe diverging meaning to the technology, offering audiences clearly varied images of what bioenergy “is”. In other words, the technology is domesticated in different ways, suggesting that media coverage plays a role in systems of innovation and diffusion. How this affects the public, however, is an under analysed element in the innovation and diffusion literature, and the paper calls for further investigation into this matter. Key words: domestication, media analysis, bioenergy, diffusion, Norway, Sweden Tomas Moe Skjølsvold is a Ph.D. candidate at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Correspond to: Department of Interdiciplinary Studies of Culture, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Policy discussions about increasing the use of renewable energy tend to focus on technical and economic aspects of current and future technologies (e.g. -
Akkreditering Jubreise 030616
Navn Medium Tom Hansen Her og Nå Roger Øversveen Her og Nå Heidi Venæs TV2-Trondheim Mette Estep NTB Roy-Arne Salater TV2-Bodø Kevin Benum Kjeldsrud TV2-Bodø Aasta Børte Bureau Aasta Signe Prøis Tynning TV2 Nina Einem NRK-Troms Marita Andersen NRK-Troms Caroline Rugeldal NRK-Troms Torbjørn Krane NRK-Troms Erling Bjørklund NRK-Troms Morten H. Kræmer NRK-Troms Gunnar Grindstein NRK-Troms Sveinung Åsali NRK-Troms Eskil Mehren NRK-Troms Ida Louise Rostad NRK-Troms Marit Garfjeld NRK-Troms Elise Holdal NRK-Troms Marthe Kindervaag TV-Vest Footograf TV-Vest TV-Vest Ingrid Margrethe Blåsmo Aronsen Mediehuset iTromsø Håkon Steinmo Mediehuset iTromsø Jørund Wessel Carlsen Mediehuset iTromsø Ronald Johansen Mediehuset iTromsø Frank Asbjørn Hole Nilsen Studentradioen Ingunn Helen Arnøy Hole Studentradioen Marius Gulliksrud Stella Pictures Kjell Arne Totland TV2 Anne Frdrikstad TV2 Lene Østby TV2 Julian Parker UK Press Bernard Rübsamen Royalportraits Europe Marion Roth The Protestant Church of Baden Caroline Vagle Se og Hør Anders J. Stavseng Se og Hør Andreas Fadum Se og Hør Morten Torjussen TV2-Kristiansand Christopher Fornebo TV2-Kristiansand Connie Bentzrud TV2-Kristiansand Steinar Figved TV2-Stavanger Marte Skodje TV2-Stavanger Kristian Myhre TV2-Stavanger Øyvind Hermstad TV2-Trondheim Tommy Andersen TV2-Trondheim Carl Gunnar Eltervaag TV2-Trondheim Martin Andersen Adresseavisen Rune Petter Ness Adresseavisen Kim Nygård Adresseavisen Terje Svaan Adresseavisen Jens P. Søraa Adresseavisen Kjell A. Olsen, fotograf Adresseavisen Kjerstin Rabås, journalist. Adresseavisen Kai Kristiansen, journalist. Adresseavisen Pål Solberg, journalist. Adresseavisen Charlotte Ø. Sundby, journalist. Adresseavisen Aagot Opheim, journalist. Adresseavisen Mia Kristin Midtbø, journalist. Adresseavisen Lina Leth-Olsen, journalist. Adresseavisen Camilla Kilnes, journalist. -
Antisemitism in the Contemporary American University
The Norwegian Government: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Policies (2005–2013) Manfred Gerstenfeld and Orna Orvell ABSTRACT The Labor-dominated Norwegian governments (2005–2013) in which Jens Stoltenberg was Prime Minister played a major role in incitement against and demonization of Israel, along with Norway’s leading media and segments of the country’s elites. Several of Norway’s discriminatory acts or proposals against Israel expressed double standards and constituted antisemitic behavior. Under Stoltenberg, Norway was often a pioneer of anti-Israelism in the Western world. The frequent inflammatory rhetoric greatly contributed to the finding in a government-funded study that 38% of the Norwegian population believe that Israel behaves toward the Palestinians like the Nazis behaved toward the Jews. INTRODUCTION Thirty-eight percent of Norwegians believe that Israel acts toward the Palestinians like the Nazis behaved toward the Jews. This figure was published in 2012 by the Norwegian Center for Studies of the Holocaust and Religious Minorities, a study paid for by the Norwegian government.1 Its findings show that about 1.5 million adult citizens of the country hold a demonic view of Israel. Studies in other European countries found similar or higher percentages of people who believe that Israel behaves like the Nazis, or is waging a war of ex- termination against the Palestinians. To be considered like Nazis is a con- temporary expression of “absolute evil” in Western societies. In June 2011, the Oslo Municipality published a study on harassment of children in Oslo high schools. It found that one-third of Jewish high school students were harassed verbally or physically at least two or three times a month.2 One rarely finds such high levels of antisemitism at schools in other Western societies. -
Rethinking Mass Communications in Norway the Neglected Power of the Centre-Left Alliance in the Early 20Th Century and Its Importance Until the Present
Nordicom Review 35 (2014) 2, pp. 43-63 Rethinking Mass Communications in Norway The Neglected Power of the Centre-Left Alliance in the Early 20th Century and its Importance until the Present Henrik G. Bastiansen Abstract The present article discusses the importance of the early years of mass communications in order to understand the shaping of them – the power of creating mass media for whole nations. It begins with references to scholars studying large nations and asks whether their results can be generalized to smaller countries. Therefore, it uses Norway as a case study. To what degree were Norway’s four major mass media – press, film, radio and television – formed institutionally in their early years? And if they were formed in this way, how long did the consequences of such a formation last? These questions have been neglected topics in research, so in order to answer them we also need to rethink the connections between the different media. Keywords: formative years of mass communications, media power, media system, media history Introduction The person who wants to see his/her own time correctly, must see it from afar. José Ortega y Gasset, in The Revolt of the Masses, 1934: 51 In countries like the United States and Great Britain, we know that the modern means of mass communication became organized quite early. A large body of scholarly work has shown the importance of the formative years: What happened then established the foundations for much of the later development. Pioneers started up new media, organized their power and achieved dominance over institutions that became world famous giants of mass communications. -
Unique Visitors December 1999 1.1 Mill
schibsted.com company overview and on-line statistics NEWSPAPERS TV/FILM MULTIMEDIA Annual Accounts 1999 "schibsted.com" Scandinavia Online Newspapers' on-line activites Schibsted Multimedia • SOL Norway 64% • Aftenposten.no 100% • Hugin AS 30% • SOL Sweden 50% • VG.no 100% • TicNet AB 50% • SOL Denmark 86.5% • Aftonbladet.se 100% • Startsiden 32% • Svenska Dagbladet.se 74% • SOL Børs 51% • Bokkilden AS 100% • Alt om København 49% • Alt om Stockholm 100% • Lommelegen AS 18% • Skiinfo 11% • Filminfo AS 66% • Ecomda/Referanse 38% • Imedia AS 50% • Musikklink.com 100% NEWSPAPERS TV/FILM MULTIMEDIA Annual Accounts 1999 Scandinavia Online Scandinavia Online AS 64% 64% Infostream (OSE: INF) 9% 5.8% Reisefeber * 14.25% 36% Billettservice AS 17% 10.9% SOL Børs AS 45.0% 51% Schibsted owns 56% of ”Pan-SOL” Nettmarked (Netbonus)* 36% 57% Bid2Day* 24% 38% Freetrax* 10.4% 12.4% Radio SOL 49.0% 31.4% "SOL OY" 100% 100% Scandinavia Online AB 50% 50% 86.5% 86.5% Scandinavia Online AS DK Netbonus Holding AB* 36% 57% Avanza AB (Inside) 11% 6% Reisefeber* 14.25% 36% Resfeber* 28% 36% Bid2Day* 12% 38% Bilguiden/Bilweb AB 53% 27% Billettnet 0% (royalty agr.) Bid2Day AB* 24% 38% Netbonus AS* 18% 57% Freetrax* 7.2% 12.4% Freetrax* 2.4% 12.5% Netstationen AS 50% 43.25% left column; ownership right column: Schibsted’s total ownership NEWSPAPERS TV/FILM MULTIMEDIA Annual Accounts 1999 Newspapers’ on-line activities Aftenposten Aftonbladet Aftenposten Interaktiv 100% 100% Net2 Interactive 12% 41% Aftonbladet Hierta AB 100.0% 100% FINN 62% 73% Aftonbladet Nya Medier -
Actors, Arenas, and Aspirations
2 Georg Borgström and the population-food dilemma Reception and consequences in Norwegian public debate in the 1950s and 1960s Sunniva Engh I have been to many meetings and heard many lectures, but hardly anything has made a stronger impact than this, on 18 March 1968. The Student Union was crowded. People were standing along the walls and in the corridors. The lecture hall was quiet as a grave – a breathless attention, soon followed by wild applause.1 This 2018 description by Svein Sundsbø of Georg Borgström’s lecture, “Agri- culture and the World Hunger Crisis”, delivered 50 years earlier at the Nor- wegian Agricultural College at Ås reveals Borgström’s enormous, lasting appeal. To the students, Borgström was an international academic superstar who spoke with transformative effect about the issues that mattered to the 1968 generation. According to Borgström, the world’s population explosion created food shortages, which, in combination with unjust international distribution and the exhaustion of natural resources, would lead to a global crisis. The world had, at most, ten years to choose a different course and save humanity from a dismal future. The career of Sundsbø, the 1968 president of the student union at Ås, illustrates the effect of Borgström’s message: he has dedicated his professional life to public service, as secretary general of the Centre Party and as minister for agriculture 1985–1986, focusing in particular on matters of climate, energy, and environment. How did Georg Borgström (1912–1990) come to make such an impression on Sundsbø and other Norwegians in 1968? A Swedish plant physiologist and scientist, Borgström earned his PhD in botany at the University of Lund in 1939.