DOCSLIB.ORG

ID-Nummer Aktørnavn 1 ADRESSEAVISEN 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ID-Nummer Aktørnavn 1 ADRESSEAVISEN 2 ID-nummer Aktørnavn 1 ADRESSEAVISEN 2 AFTENPOSTEN 399 AFTENPOSTEN JUNIOR 143 AGDER FLEKKEFJORDS TIDENDE 5 AGDERPOSTEN 6 AKERS AVIS GRORUDDALEN 7 AKERSHUS AMTSTIDENDE 10 ALTAPOSTEN 418 ALVDAL MIDT I VÆLA 11 ANDØYPOSTEN 14 ARBEIDETS RETT 371 ARENDALS TIDENDE 15 ASKER OG BÆRUMS BUDSTIKKE 16 ASKØYVÆRINGEN 17 AURA AVIS 18 AUST AGDER BLAD 397 AVISA HEMNES 419 AVISA LOFOTEN 326 AVISA NORDLAND 158 AVISA SØR-TRØNDELAG 270 AVVIR 19 BERGENSAVISEN (BA) 20 BERGENS TIDENDE 352 BIRKENES-AVISA 181 BLADET VESTERÅLEN 21 BRØNNØYSUNDS AVIS 22 BYGDANYTT 23 BYGDEBLADET 310 BYGDEBLADET RANDABERG OG RENNESØY 24 BYGDEPOSTEN 284 BØ BLAD 25 BØMLO-NYTT 27 DAGBLADET 28 DAGEN 113 DAGENS NÆRINGSLIV 403 DAGENS PERSPEKTIV 26 DAG OG TID 13 DAGSAVISEN 30 DALANE TIDENDE 31 DEMOKRATEN 32 DRAMMENS TIDENDE 316 DRANGEDALSPOSTEN 33 DRIVA 313 DØLEN 34 EIDSVOLD ULLENSAKER BLAD 344 EIKER BLADET 322 ENEBAKK AVIS 35 FANAPOSTEN 245 FINANSAVISEN 38 FINNMARK DAGBLAD 39 FINNMARKEN 37 FINNMARKSPOSTEN 40 FIRDA 43 FIRDAPOSTEN 42 FIRDA TIDEND 311 FISKERIBLADET FISKAREN 271 FJELL-LJOM 44 FJORDABLADET 45 FJORDENES TIDENDE 46 FJORDINGEN 238 FJUKEN 49 FOSNA-FOLKET 375 FRAMTIA 231 FRAMTID I NORD 50 FREDRIKSSTAD BLAD 51 FREMOVER 370 FROLENDINGEN 206 FROSTINGEN 56 FÆDRELANDSVENNEN 335 GAULA 57 GAULDALSPOSTEN 58 GJENGANGEREN 243 GJESDALBUEN 59 GLÅMDALEN 60 GRANNAR 61 GRENDA 62 GRIMSTAD ADRESSETIDENDE 63 GUDBRANDSDØLEN DAGNINGEN 65 HADELAND 66 HALDEN ARBEIDERBLAD 67 HALLINGDØLEN 68 HAMAR ARBEIDERBLAD 393 HAMMERFESTINGEN 72 HARDANGER FOLKEBLAD 73 HARSTAD TIDENDE 74 HAUGESUNDS AVIS 76 HELGELANDS BLAD 75 HELGELENDINGEN 85 HITRA-FRØYA LOKALAVIS 78 HORDALAND 79 HORDALAND FOLKEBLAD 392 HÅLOGALAND AVIS 261 INDERØYNINGEN 82 INDRE AKERSHUS BLAD 406 INNHERRED 168 ITROMSØ 249 JARLSBERG AVIS 86 JÆRBLADET 356 KANALEN 600 KLAR TALE 89 KLASSEKAMPEN 373 KLÆBUPOSTEN 345 KORSETS SEIER 90 KRAGERØ BLAD VESTMAR 404 KRONSTADPOSTEN 91 KVINNHERINGEN 391 KYST OG FJORD 286 LIERPOSTEN 94 LILLESANDS-POSTEN 95 LINDESNES 36 LISTER 96 LOFOTPOSTEN 211 LOFOT-TIDENDE 301 LOKALAVISA NORDSALTEN 367 LOKALAVISA TRYSIL-ENGERDAL 402 LYNGDALS AVIS 92 LAAGENDALSPOSTEN 212 MARSTEINEN 213 MELØYAVISA 214 MERÅKERPOSTEN 99 MORGENBLADET 100 MOSS AVIS 102 MØRE 103 MØRE-NYTT 104 NAMDALSAVISA 105 NATIONEN 369 NORDDALEN 107 NORDHORDLAND 110 NORDLYS 70 NORDRE 111 NORDSTRANDS BLAD 235 NORDVESTNYTT 325 NORGE IDAG 116 NYE TROMS 119 OPDALINGEN 357 OPP 120 OPPLAND ARBEIDERBLAD 215 OS OG FUSAPOSTEN 123 PORSGRUNNS DAGBLAD 190 RAKKESTAD AVIS 124 RANA BLAD 125 RAUMNES 126 RINGERIKES BLAD 127 RINGSAKER BLAD 128 RJUKAN ARBEIDERBLAD 130 ROGALANDS AVIS 8 ROMERIKES BLAD 133 ROMSDALS BUDSTIKKE 135 RYFYLKE 217 RØYKEN OG HURUMS AVIS 137 SAGAT 300 SALTENPOSTEN 218 SAMNINGEN 265 SANDE AVIS 141 SANDEFJORDS BLAD 246 SANDNESPOSTEN 140 SARPSBORG ARBEIDERBLAD 219 SELBYGGEN 144 SETESDØLEN 343 SMAALENENES AVIS 295 SNÅSNINGEN 147 SOGN AVIS 299 SOLABLADET 381 SOLUNGAVISA 365 STANGEAVISA 148 STAVANGER AFTENBLAD 220 STEINKJER-AVISA 150 STJØRDALENS BLAD 234 STORFJORDNYTT 152 STRANDBUEN 153 STRILEN 221 SULAPOSTEN 222 SULDALSPOSTEN 154 SUNNHORDLAND 202 SUNNMØRINGEN 156 SUNNMØRSPOSTEN 232 SVALBARDPOSTEN 223 SVELVIKSPOSTEN 283 SYDVESTEN 157 SYKKYLVSBLADET 228 SYNSTE MØRE 321 SØGNE OG SONGDALEN BUDSTIKKE 159 SØR-VARANGER AVIS 285 SØVESTEN 161 TELEMARKSAVISA 163 TELEN 165 TIDENS KRAV 167 TROMS FOLKEBLAD 169 TRØNDER-AVISA 97 TRØNDERBLADET 170 TVEDESTRANDSPOSTEN 224 TYSNES 225 TYSVÆR BYGDEBLAD 171 TØNSBERGS BLAD 364 UTROP 226 VAKSDAL POSTEN 174 VALDRES 175 VARDEN 176 VARINGEN 177 VENNESLA TIDENDE 227 VESTAVIND BYGDEBLAD FOR SVEIO 258 VESTBY AVIS 180 VESTERAALENS AVIS 183 VESTLANDSNYTT 236 VESTNESAVISA 233 VESTNYTT 179 VEST-TELEMARK BLAD 178 VG 289 VIGGA 186 VIKEBLADET VESTPOSTEN 259 VÅGANAVISA 188 VÅRT LAND 405 YDERST 318 YTRE SOGN 189 YTRINGEN 247 ØKSNESAVISA 320 ØSTERDØLEN 296 ØSTHAVET 192 ØSTLANDETS BLAD 193 ØSTLANDS-POSTEN 195 ØSTLENDINGEN 230 ØY-BLIKK 323 ØYENE 309 ØYPOSTEN 374 ÅMLIAVISA 198 ÅNDALSNES AVIS 274 ÅSANE TIDENDE 273 ÅS AVIS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2003
    ANNUAL REPORT 2003 >>02 Main Events >>19 Social responsibility >>30 Newspapers >>53 Schibsted Eiendom >>03 Key Figures >>20 Statement of the >>40 TV, Film & Publishing (Property >>04 The Schibsted Group Election Committee >>48 Business Management) >>05 President & CEO >>21 The Tinius Trust Development >>54 Articles of Kjell Aamot >>22 Focus on Newspaper >>49 Management Association >>06 Business Areas >>24 Focus on Mobile Development >>55 Annual Accounts >>10 The Board of phone >>50 Shareholder >>87 Auditor’s Report Director’s Report >>26 Focus on TV, Film & Information >>88 Company Structure >>16 Corporate Publishing >>52 Schibsted Finans >>89 Addresses Governance >>28 Focus on Internet (Finance) Tomorrow’s media society will be different from that of today. Anyone who doubts this needs only look at how young people use media. Their choices are forging the future direction. Schibsted follows this development closely. In this way, we are better equipped to exploit our strength as a leading media group in Scandinavia. >> 2 THE SCHIBSTED GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2003 MAIN EVENTS • avis1 cuts approx. 10 full-time jobs. duction of 925 new episodes of the • Knut L. Tiseth appointed Managing popular series Hotel Cæsar. Q 1 03 Director of Schibsted Trykk. • Establishment of European Works • Morten Kongrød appointed Chief Council (ESU) in the Group. Executive Officer of Sandrew • Sandrew Metronome renews coopera- Metronome. tion agreement with Warner Bros. • Kristin Skogen Lund appointed Chief • 20 Min Holding AG enters into agree- Executive Officer of Scanpix ment with tamedia for the sale of Scandinavia. Swiss operations by 1st quarter 2007. • Metronome Film & Television enters into agreement with TV 2 for the pro- • 20minutos launched in Seville, with a • Aftonbladet’s online version shows its circulation of 50,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Navn Sum Utgiver Sum Opphavsmenn Til Bedrift Adresseavisen 217 095
    Navn Sum Utgiver Sum opphavsmenn Til bedrift Adresseavisen 217 095 208 736 425 831 Aftenposten 379 331 364 726 744 057 Agder (Flekkefjords Tidende) 59 646 57 350 116 996 Agderposten 30 153 28 992 59 145 Akershus Amtstidende 5 623 5 406 11 029 Altaposten 79 750 76 680 156 430 Andøyposten 1 536 1 477 3 013 Arbeidets Rett 4 572 4 396 8 969 Askøyværingen 7 562 7 271 14 832 Aura Avis 2 647 2 545 5 191 Aust Agder Blad 1 222 1 175 2 397 Avisa Nordland 19 544 18 791 38 335 Avisenes nyhetsbyrå 4 387 4 218 8 605 Ávvir 833 801 1 633 Bergens Tidende 124 846 120 039 244 885 Bergensavisen 21 823 20 983 42 806 Bladet Vesterålen 17 412 16 742 34 154 Brønnøysunds Avis 7 662 7 367 15 029 Budstikka 104 050 100 044 204 093 Bygdanytt 5 682 5 463 11 145 Bygdebladet 2 684 2 581 5 265 Bygdeposten 3 855 3 707 7 562 Bømlo-nytt 10 664 10 254 20 918 Computerworld 9 270 8 913 18 182 Dag og Tid 751 722 1 473 Dagbladet 182 977 175 933 358 910 Dagen Magazinet 60 337 58 014 118 351 Dagsavisen 69 612 66 932 136 543 Dalane Tidende 3 462 3 329 6 791 Demokraten 3 224 3 100 6 323 Drammens Tidende 39 530 38 009 77 539 Driva 3 702 3 560 7 262 E24 Næringsliv 77 353 74 375 151 728 Eidsvold Ullensaker Blad 27 635 26 571 54 207 Eikerbladet 1 025 986 2 011 Fanaposten 5 788 5 565 11 354 Farsunds Avis 32 762 31 501 64 262 Firda 10 044 9 657 19 701 Firda Tidend 2 707 2 603 5 310 Firdaposten 3 050 2 932 5 982 Fiskeribladet Fiskaren 246 237 483 Fjordabladet 7 716 7 418 15 134 Fjordenes Tidende 2 676 2 573 5 250 Fjordingen 2 762 2 656 5 418 Forskning.no 45 605 43 849 89 454 Fosna-Folket
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Influence on Immigration: the Case of Norway
    ISSN 0080–6757 Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00250.x © 2010 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2010 Nordic Political Science Association Partisan Influence on Immigration: The Case of Norwayscps_250 248..270 Frøy Gudbrandsen* Do governments decide the size of immigration? This article analyses partisan impact on refugee immigration to Norway.The first part maps party positions on refugee immigration and demonstrates that the views of Norwegian parties are far from consensual. The second part tests whether the number of refugees admitted has been affected by changes of government by way of a panel analysis covering the period 1985–2005 and 143 sending countries. Controlling for other determinants of immigration both in receiving and sending countries, the analysis suggests that that the number of refugees admitted to Norway has been significantly lower during Conservative rule. Among parties with government experience, the Conservative Party also has adopted the most restrictive stand in its manifestoes. No significant differences between Labour Party and centre governments were found, even though the centre parties express more liberal preferences. The partisan influence on immigration remains uncertain. Scholars come to diverging conclusions, both on the validity of the partisan theory in general (see, e.g., Blais et al. 1993; Imbeau et al. 2001) and on states’ capacity to control immigration (see, e.g., Sassen, 1996, 2000; Guiraudon & Lahav 2000). Although some studies reject a partisan effect on national economic indicators, many find strong empirical support for the hypoth- esis (e.g., Huber & Stephens 2000; Cusack 1997; Reed 2006; Pettersson- Lidbom 2004). Yet what about immigration? Do governments control it, or is it determined entirely by external determinants? Not only scholars, but politicians, too, disagree on their influence on immigration.
    [Show full text]
  • Schibsted Annual Report 2019 Who We Are
    Index Who we are .................................................................................................................................. 3 Message from the CEO ................................................................................................................ 4 Board of Directors’ report ........................................................................................................... 5 Sustainability report ................................................................................................................. 12 Corporate governance .............................................................................................................. 36 Financial statements for the Group .......................................................................................... 44 Financial statements for parent company ............................................................................... 91 Share information ................................................................................................................... 104 Members of the Board (2019-2020) ........................................................................................ 107 SCHIBSTED ANNUAL REPORT 2019 WHO WE ARE Who we are Schibsted is an international family of digital consumer brands with more than 5,000 employees. We have world-class media houses in Scandinavia, leading marketplaces and digital services that empower consumers. Millions of people interact with Schibsted companies every day. What we do We rely on
    [Show full text]
  • Aviser, Vekepresse Og Fagpresse.Pdf
    Statistiske analysar 131 Kulturstatistikk 2011 12. Aviser, vekepresse og fagpresse 12.1. Nokre resultat Minkande avisopplag Trenden med nedgang i opplagstala for papiravisene held fram. Samla avisopplag i 2011 var på 2,5 millionar, ein nedgang på 71 000, eller 2,8 prosent frå året før. Frå 2009 til 2010 var fallet noko større, 3,3 prosent. 2011 er det tolvte året på rad med nedgang, og samla nedgang sidan 1998 er 21 prosent (Høst 2012). Sjølv om avisopplaga fell, er det likevel verdt å merke seg at talet på aviser har vore nokolunde stabilt dei siste åra. Ved utgangen av 2011 var det 228 aviser i Noreg. Dette er to aviser fleire enn i 2010. Nesten alle kategoriar aviser har hatt fall i opplagstala, bortsett frå riksspreidde meiningsbêrande aviser og nasjonale fådagarsaviser. Dei fleste åra sidan 2005 har laussalsavisene vore dei store taparane. Samla opplagstal for dei to laussalsavisene i Noreg, Verdens Gang og Dagbladet, var 311 000 i 2011. Samanlikna med 2010 er det ein nedgang på 20 000, eller 6 prosent. Sidan 2005 er opplagstalet for laussalsavisene redusert med nesten 39 prosent. Sjå tabell 12.4. Figur 12.1. Aviser. Opplagstal, etter type.1 2005-2011 Aften#2Aften3 2005 2007 2009 2010 2011 Nasjonale fådagarsaviser Lokale vekeaviser Lokale 2-3 dagarsaviser Lokale dagsaviser, nr. 2 Leiande lokale dagsaviser Riksspreidde meiningsbêrande aviser Nr.2-aviser i store byar Storbyaviser#3Storbyaviser 2 Laussalsaviser 0 200 400 600 800 1 000 Opplag i 1 000 1 Ei avis som før 2007 blei rekna som avis, er ikkje lenger med i statistikken.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norwegian Progress Party: an Established Populist Party Johan Bjerkem
    EUROPeAN VIeW DOI 10.1007/s12290-016-0404-8 ARTICLE The Norwegian Progress Party: an established populist party Johan Bjerkem © The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This article sheds light on one of Europe’s successful right-wing populist parties, the Norwegian Progress Party. Since 2013 the party has been in a coalition with the Conservative Party. The history, ideology and position of the party in the Norwegian political system are factors that explain how a centre–right party and a populist one have been able to form a viable coalition. Over time the Progress Party has become increasingly well integrated into the political system. The fact that no cordon sanitaire or total boycott policy was implemented against it may explain why the party developed a more moderate and pragmatic approach than most other right-wing populist parties. In turn, this made it possible for the Conservative Party to offer to form a coalition with the Progress Party and placed the centre–right in the strategic position of cooperating with parties both in the centre and to the right. Keywords Populism | Right-wing politics | Political parties | Centre–right | Norway | The Progress Party J. Bjerkem (*) Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, Rue du Commerce 20, 1000 Brussels, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 1 3 EUROPEAN VIEW Introduction The Norwegian Progress Party is an example of a successful European populist party which has not only gained seats in parliament, but has also become a governing party. Established in the early 1970s, mainly as an anti-tax protest party, it transformed into an anti-immigration and anti-establishment party in the 1980s, before positioning itself as one of the main political forces in Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Euroscepticism Revisited. the Gap Between Policy and Practice
    NORWEGIAN EUROSCEPTICISM REVISITED. THE GAP BETWEEN POLICY AND PRACTICE LISE RYE Norway has a reputation for being Eurosceptic. It earned this reputation for hav- ing rejected membership of the European Union (EU) on two separate occasions. Both rejections followed advisory referenda where a small majority had voted down the government’s negotiations with the EU: In September 1972, 53.5% voted against joining the then European Community (EC), and in November 1994, 52.2% opposed the Norwegian EU accession. This makes Norway the only country which rejected an offer to partake in the European integration project on two separate occasions. Previous research has highlighted the reasons for Nor- way’s reluctance to join the EU. While rationalists emphasize the characteristics of the country’s industrial structure1, constructivists draw the attention to aspects related to identity2 and values.3 This chapter’s point of departure is that Norway, alongside its refusal to join the EU’s political unification project, is the EU’s most integrated outsider.4 This current but less known position is the result of an economic integration process between Norway and the EC that goes back to 1973. In an attempt to compensate for the failed attempt to enter the EC together with Denmark and the United Kingdom in the early 1970s, the Norwegian governments engaged in a political process aiming at formalizing and then gradually extending relations between the remaining members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and the EC.5 This process entered a new and more dynamic phase with the 1994 com- mencement of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), which in- stitutionalized Norway’s relations with the EU and extended them to new policy areas.6 Norway’s continuous quest for ever-closer relations with the EU nuances its image as a Eurosceptic country and calls for closer examination of its multi- faceted relation with Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakgrunnen for Media Norge
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Camilla Fosse Knut Tornes Helge Østbye Bakgrunnen for Media Norge Rapport til Rådet for anvendt medieforskning (RAM) Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap Universitetet i Bergen juni 2010 1 © Forfatterne ISBN 978-82-8033-030-7 Rapporten er også lagt ut i BORA (Bergen Open Research Archive) for gratis nedlasting: https://bora.uib.no/ Henvendelser til: [email protected] Helge Østbye Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap Boks 7801 5020 Bergen 2 Innhold: Forord 5 1. Introduksjon 7 2. Frykten for eierkonsentrasjon i mediene 13 3. Schibsted-sfæren 25 4. Ideen om Media Norge 33 5. Eierne behandler fusjonen: «… and then they were four» 55 6. Hvem skal stanse gorillaen? 67 7. Stoffutveksling 2008 – 2009 93 8. Avslutning 109 Referanser 111 3 4 Forord Prosjektet ble etablert på oppfordring fra Rådet for anvendt medieforskning (RAM), og med finansiering fra Rådet. RAM er får sine midler fra Kultur- departementet og er administrert av Medietilsynet. Oppdraget gikk til Helge Østbye ved Institutt for informasjons- og medievitenskap (Universitetet i Bergen). Camilla Fosse leverte i 2008 en masteroppgave i medievitenskap med tittelen Historien om Media Norge . En del av materialet ble videre bearbeidet i et bokkapittel i Martin Eide (red.): Journalistiske nyorienteringer (2009) Knut Tornes leverte i 2009 en masteroppgave i medievitenskap med tittelen Media Norge, samarbeid og mangfold. Disse tre arbeidene er brukt i denne rapporten. I den grad det i rapporten hentes saksframstillinger, sitater fra kilder, etc. fra disse arbeidene, skjer det som oftest uten nærmere henvisninger til det aktuelle arbeidet.
    [Show full text]
  • Komiteer Og Utvalg Pr 1
    KOMITEER OG UTVALG PR 1. MAI 2019 Styrer MBL Hovedstyre: Tove Nedreberg, Adresseavisen (17-19) Stig Finslo, Amedia (17-19) Siv Juvik Tveitnes, Schibsted (18-20) Nils Gauslaa, Agderposten (18-20) Victoria Schultz, Amedia (17-19) Pål Nedregotten, Amedia (17-19) Bård Skaar Viken, Schibsted Norge (18-20) Tomas Myrbostad, TV 2 (18-20) Hanne Haugsgjerd, Dagbladet/Aller Media (17-19) Per Magne Tveiten, Mentor Medier (17-19) Axel Walø, Egmont Publishing (18-20) Grethe Malkmus, VG (18-20) Varamedlemmer (i rekkefølge) Trond Sundnes, Dagens Næringsliv (18-20) Stig Jacobsen, Mediehuset iTromsø (17-19) Eirik Hoff Lysholm, Dagsavisen (17-19) Torunn Pettersen, Bonnier Media (17-19) Ingrid Kløve-Graue, Hordaland Bladdrift (18-20) Marit Skog, Harstad Tidende Gruppen (18-20) Leder: Tove Nedreberg Nestleder: Stig Finslo Arbeidsutvalg: Tove Nedreberg, Adresseavisen Stig Finslo, Amedia Siv Juvik Tveitnes, Schibsted Norge Per Magne Tveiten, Mentor Medier Tomas Myrbostad, TV 2 Valgkomite for årsmøtet 2019: Medlemmer: 1. Harald Jacobsen, Schibsted Norge 2. Harald H. Rise, Polaris 3. Kjersti Moe, Egmont Publishing 4. Pål Eskås, Amedia 5. Sarah Willand, TV2 6. Ernst A. Eik, Jærbladet/Nordsjø Media 7. Anna B. Jenssen, Morgenbladet 1 Personlige varamedlemmer: 1. Ann Mari Ågotnes, Schibsted Norge 2. Per Olav Monseth, Polaris Media 3. Ingeborg Heldal, Aller Media 4. Ann Baekken, Amedia 5. Øivind Johannesen, TV2 6. Øyvind Klausen, Agderposten 7. Irene Halvorsen, Vårt Land NHOs Representantskap Tove Nedreberg, Adresseavisen Vararepresentant: Stig Finslo, Amedia NHOs Generalforsamling Siv Juvik Tveitnes, Schibsted Norge Nils Gauslaa, Agderposten Vararepresentanter: Tomas Myrbostad, TV 2 Per Magne Tveiten, Mentor Medier Analyse og utvikling Markedsforum Mandat: MBLs markedsforum skal gi strategiske råd til hovedstyret om hvordan markedsområdets utfordringer og muligheter kan løses og utvikles fremover, særlig med tanke på å identifisere de områder der samarbeid mellom medlemsbedriftene er formålstjenlig.
    [Show full text]
  • Media, Market, State and Politics in Norway
    ISSN 1392–0561. INFORMACIJOS MOKSLAI. 2008 47 Media, market, state and politics in Norway Dr. Robert Vaagan Oslo University College, Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information Science PO Box 4, St.Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway Phone: 47 22 45 26 65, fax: 47 22 45 26 05 E-mail: [email protected] The article builds on Hallin & Mancini (2004) who have used a democratic corporatist model to analyze the media markets of several Northern and Central European countries, including Norway. An analysis of the Norwegian media market is presented, focusing on five key issue areas: changes in media usage, financing, technology, ownership and legislation. The analysis partially supports one of the key features of Hallin & Mancini’s model, i.e. the fairly interventionist role of the Norwegian authorities in the media sector. This is nonetheless tempered by the high level of marketization in most issue areas examined. Overall, there is therefore some reason to argue that “market is king” in Norwegian media. Keywords: Norwegian media market, media usage, financing, technology, ownership, legislation, marketization 1. Introduction and microeconomic issues on the supply and the demand side, ranging from international This paper originated in a lecture I gave 18– trade, business strategy, pricing policies, 19 April 2008 at the Baltic-Nordic conference competition, and industrial concentration as BAMR: Setting A Comparative Baltic-Nordic they affect media enterprises and industries Media Research Agenda, held at the Vytautas (Doyle, 2002, p. 2). In this line of analysis Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania. I any given “media market” would include had been invited to speak on the subject of both the supply side – the media industry “Market-led reforms and the media in Nor� and its total output – and the demand side – way”.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 CASE TWO: Reversals of Body-Law in Norway: Birth Control and Abortion
    6 CASE TWO: Reversals of Body-Law in Norway: Birth Control and Abortion 6.1 Introduction: Same Issues, Different Direction, Different Result Both the United States and Norway underwent social movements that advocated for the right to birth control and to have an abortion within certain parameters; but those paths took different forms and eventually led to significant differences. Effectively, the Storting became the arena in which the debate on these measures took place in Norway. In America, reformers worked at both the state and federal levels within their individual state legislatures, all the while attempting various arguments at the Supreme Court level. In contrast to the American case law resulting from the facts in Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), the Norwegian Storting had, at various times, passed laws on birth control and abortion from the late 1950s to 1978, in which accommodations on the issues had been reached and legally formalized within that body. But in 1978, the new Norwegian law was the result of a legislative consensus which itself was based on a larger socio-political upheaval. Norwegian women had tried for as long as their country had existed to extract the same reproductive rights as their American counterparts had also fought for, working consistently but also unsuc- cessfully on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean. At the beginning of the Storting session in 1978, members of the Norwegian Stort- ing who might have happened to read Aftenposten, could have read about protests by both the Christian-based Folkesaksjon (People’s Action Against Abortion, FASA) and the Feminist Movement in Oslo and throughout Norway.914 Segments of the national Lutheran Church (Den Norske Kirke, DNK) in Norway became the leading resisters to social change especially change with regard to the role of women in society and to any changes in sexual norms.
    [Show full text]