DOCSLIB.ORG

Framing of Pro-Minority Political Parties by Mainstream Media

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Framing of Pro-Minority Political Parties by Mainstream Media UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN Department of Administration and Organization Theory AORG350 Master's Thesis in Administration and Organizational Science SPRING 2021 Framing of Pro-Minority Political Parties by Mainstream Media: A case study of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (Halkların Demokratik Partisi – HDP) and the Turkish Press ARJEN CELEBI 1 Contents List of tables and figures ................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 6 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Relevance and Importance ................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Research Objectives and Questions ................................................................................... 10 1.3. Outline of the Thesis .......................................................................................................... 11 2. CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION ....................................................................................... 13 2.1. Kurdish Conflict in Turkey ................................................................................................ 13 2.2. Turkeyfication and the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) ................................................ 16 2.3. The Kurdish Issue during the AKP governments .............................................................. 21 2.4. Newspaper Landscape and Journalism in Turkey ............................................................. 26 3. LITERATURE REVIEW & THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .......................................... 30 3.1. Framing & Frames in Political Communication ................................................................ 31 3.2. News-frames and Public Opinion ...................................................................................... 34 3.3. Framing of the Kurds in Turkish Context .......................................................................... 41 3.4. Theoretical Framework ...................................................................................................... 43 4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 47 4.1. Choice of the Case ............................................................................................................. 47 2 4.2. Data Collection .................................................................................................................. 50 4.3. Analysis.............................................................................................................................. 52 4.4. Limitations ......................................................................................................................... 64 4.5. Validity .............................................................................................................................. 65 5. FINDINGS & DISCUSSION ................................................................................................ 68 5.1. RQ1: How was the HDP framed in the front pages of the Hürriyet, Sabah and Sözcü from June 2015 to November 2015? ..................................................................................................... 68 5.1.1. Hürriyet ............................................................................................................................... 68 5.1.2. Sabah ................................................................................................................................... 73 5.1.3. Sözcü ................................................................................................................................... 78 5.2. RQ2: What are the differences and similarities between the frames used by different newspapers to address/refer to the HDP in their coverage of events? .......................................... 83 5.3. RQ3: What is the relationship between the variations in the framing of the HDP and the political alignment of the newspapers? ......................................................................................... 87 5. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 92 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................... 95 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 97 3 List of tables and figures Table1: Transition of the Mainstream Pro-Kurdish Parties in Turkey (Adapted from (Celep, 2018) ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 2: Parliamentary Election Results for the Mainstream Pro-Kurdish Parties in Turkey (1991 – 2018) Source: Supreme Election Council Election Archive ...................................................... 21 Table 3 Political alignment and size information about the selected newspapers for 2015 ......... 50 Table 4 Hurriyet, 12 October ........................................................................................................ 54 Table 5 Sabah, 13 August ............................................................................................................. 55 Table 6 Sözcü, 10 June ................................................................................................................. 55 Table 7 Overview of the generic and issue-specific frames ......................................................... 57 Table 8 Overview of the events through which the HDP were addressed .................................... 62 Table 9 – Overview of findings for Hürriyet ................................................................................ 70 Table 10 Hürriyet, 1 August ......................................................................................................... 71 Table 11 Hürriyet, 13 July ............................................................................................................ 71 Table 12 Hürriyet, 18 October ...................................................................................................... 72 Table 13 Hürriyet, 28 September .................................................................................................. 72 Table 14 Hürriyet, 27 October ...................................................................................................... 72 Table 15 Overview of findings for Sabah ..................................................................................... 75 Table 16 Sabah, 20 August ........................................................................................................... 76 Table 17 Sabah, 18 June ............................................................................................................... 76 Table 18 Sabah, 26 June ............................................................................................................... 77 Table 19 Sabah, 17 September ...................................................................................................... 77 Table 20 Sabah, 2 August ............................................................................................................. 77 4 Table 21 Overview of findings for Sözcü ..................................................................................... 80 Table 22 Sözcü, 8 August ............................................................................................................ 81 Table 23 Sözcü, 6 September ........................................................................................................ 81 Table 24 Sözcü, 13 August ........................................................................................................... 82 Table 25 Sözcü, 14 October .......................................................................................................... 82 Table 26 Sözcü, 26 October .......................................................................................................... 83 Table 27 Comparison of newspapers based on themes ................................................................ 86 Table 28 Comparison of frames .................................................................................................... 86 Table 29 Codebook for identification of generic and issue-specific frames ................................ 95 Figure 1 Cascading network activation (Entman, 2003) .............................................................. 39 Figure 2 Scheme of Research Questions ...................................................................................... 46 Figure 5 Hürriyet, 15 August ........................................................................................................ 69 Figure 8 Sabah, 15 August ............................................................................................................ 74 Figure 7 Sözcü, 15 August ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey's Kurdish Initiatives
    ARTICLE IDENTITY, NARRATIVE AND FRAMES: ASSESSING TURKEY’S KURDISH INITIATIVES Identity, Narrative and Frames: Assessing Turkey’s Kurdish Initiatives JOHANNA NYKÄNEN* ABSTRACT In 2009 the Turkish government launched a novel initiative to tackle the Kurdish question. The initiative soon ran into deadlock, only to be un- tangled towards the end of 2012 when a new policy was announced. This comparative paper adopts Michael Barnett’s trinity of identity, narratives and frames to show how a cultural space within which a peaceful engage- ment with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) would be deemed legiti- mate and desirable was carved out. Comparisons between the two policies reveal that the framing of policy narratives can have a formative impact on their outcomes. The paper demonstrates how the governing quality of firmness fluctuated between different connotations and references, finally leading back to a deep-rooted tradition in Turkish governance. ince 1984 when the PKK commenced its armed struggle against the Turkish state, Turkish security policies have been framed around the SKurdish question with the PKK presented as the primary security threat to be tackled. Turkey’s Kurdish question has its roots in the founding of the republic in 1923, which saw Kurdish ethnicity assimilated with Turkishness. In accordance with the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), only three minorities were and continue to be officially recognized in Turkey: Armenians, Jews and Greeks. These three groups were granted minority status on the basis of their religion. Kurdish identity – whether national, racial or ethnic – was not recognized by the republic, resulting in decades of uprisings by the Kurds and oppressive and * Department assimilative politics by the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Turkey in Europe. Political, Economic, and Foreign Policy
    ISSN 2239-2122 9 IAI Research Papers The EU is changing, Turkey too, and - above all - there is systemic change and crisis all G round, ranging from economics, the spread of democratic norms and foreign policy. LOBAL The IAI Research Papers are brief monographs written by one or N.1 European Security and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, This research paper explores how the EU and Turkey can enhance their cooperation in more authors (IAI or external experts) on current problems of inter- T edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Erik Jones, 2011 URKEY GLOBAL TURKEY national politics and international relations. The aim is to promote the political, economic, and foreign policy domains and how they can find a way out of the stalemate EU-Turkey relations have reached with the lack of progress in accession greater and more up to date knowledge of emerging issues and N. 2 Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty, IN trends and help prompt public debate. edited by Raaello Matarazzo, 2011 negotiations and the increasing uncertainty over both the future of the European project E after the Eurozone crisis and Turkey’s role in it. UROPE IN EUROPE N. 3 The Challenges of State Sustainability in the Mediterranean, edited by Silvia Colombo and Nathalie Tocci, 2011 A non-profit organization, IAI was founded in 1965 by Altiero Spinel- li, its first director. N. 4 Re-thinking Western Policies in Light of the Arab Uprisings, SENEM AYDIN-DÜZGIT is Assistant Professor at the Istanbul Bilgi University and Senior POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND FOREIGN POLICY edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Miguel Haubrich-Seco, 2012 Research Affiliate of the Istanbul Policy Centre (IPC).
    [Show full text]
  • Mehmet Yuksel the Representative to The
    MEHMET YUKSEL THE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED STATES OFFICE PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC PARTY (HDP) IN TURKEY. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE, EURASIA, AND EMERGING THREATS HEARING: “TURKEY’S DEMOCRACY UNDER CHALLENGE” APRIL 5, 2017 Dear Honorable Chairman Dana Rohrabacher and distinguished members of the House Subcommittee, It is an honor for me to testify today on a crucial development in Turkey. I would like to discuss a few major threats to democracy and rule of law in Turkey. The constitutional amendments that are proposed by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the ruling AK Party projects an authoritarian system of governance, whereby absolute power is held by a single person. Even though the proposed constitutional amendments have not been legally accepted, the amendments have been implemented and practiced under the State of Emergency Rule. Let me enlist several indications of this extralegal, single-person rule: Since the failed coup attempt in July 2016, the immunity of 55 out of 59 HDP law makers has been removed. Following this, 11 HDP deputies have been arrested, including the Co-Chair Selahattin Demirtas and Co-Chair Figen Yüksekdag. The freedom of speech that democracy supports and Turkey’s Constitution guarantees is the basic allegation against Co-Chair Demirtas for what he is subjected to over 500 years of detention. Between July 22, 2015, and March, 27 2017, 8,930 HDP members were detained; and 2782 party members have been imprisoned. 494 HDP offices have been attacked; burned or vandalized, including the party headquarters. HDP rallies were attacked and law enforcement’s support for these attacks have been widely documented, even on social media.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy
    EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy Senem Aydın-Düzgit and E. Fuat Keyman Istanbul Bilgi University and Sabanci University WORKING PAPER 02 EU-Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy Senem Aydın-Düzgit and E. Fuat Keyman* Turkey EU Accession Process Democracy Deficit Abstract Introduction The current stagnation of Turkish democracy goes hand in hand with the current impasse in EU-Turkey relations. A combination of domestic Back in August 2004, we published a working paper on the role of factors with a loss of credibility of EU conditionality led to a situation Turkey’s relations with the EU in transforming Turkish democracy in which political reform is substantially stalled and in cases where it as part of a larger project on EU-Turkey relations conducted by the is realised, it is mostly conducted to serve the interests of the ruling Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) and the Economics and political elite and with no real reference to the EU. The virtuous cycle of Foreign Policy Forum (Aydın and Keyman 2004). The central argument reform that characterised the 1999-2005 period has been replaced by of the paper was that the strengthening credibility of EU conditionality a vicious cycle in which lack of effective conditionality feeds into po- towards Turkey, coupled with favourable domestic and international litical stagnation which in turn moves Turkey and the EU further away dynamics resulted in substantial reforms towards the consolidation from one another. of Turkish democracy. The paper, written prior to the EU’s decision to open accession negotiations with Turkey, concluded that the opening of accession talks with the country on the basis of a fair decision that rests on Turkey’s achievements in its modernity and democracy would constitute a crucial step in remedying the remaining problematic aspects of Turkish democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Turkish Politics Spring 2018 Türkiye'de Siyasetin
    European Union This project is co-funded by the European Union, Norwegian MFA, and Irish Aid / Bu proje Avrupa Birliği, Norveç Dışişleri Bakanlığı, ve Irlanda Yardım tarafından ortaklaşa finanse edilmektedir A Survey of Turkish Politics Spring 2018 Türkiye’de Siyasetin Topografyası Bahar 2018 Ali Bayramoğlu May/Mayıs 2018 This project is co-funded by the European Union, Norwegian MFA, and Irish Aid / Bu proje Avrupa Birliği, Norveç Dışişleri Bakanlığı, ve Irlanda Yardım tarafından ortaklaşa finanse edilmektedir European Union This project is co-funded by the European Union, Norwegian MFA, and Irish Aid / Bu proje Avrupa Birliği, Norveç Dışişleri Bakanlığı, ve Irlanda Yardım tarafından ortaklaşa finanse edilmektedir A Survey of Turkish Politics Spring 2018 Türkiye’de Siyasetin Topografyası Bahar 2018 Ali Bayramoğlu May/Mayıs 2018 3 Published by / Yayınlayan Democratic Progress Institute – Demokratik Gelişim Enstitüsü 11 Guilford Street London WC1N 1DH www.democraticprogress.org [email protected] + 44 (0) 20 7405 3835 First published / İlk Baskı, 2018 ISBN - 978-1-911205-22-7 © DPI – Democratic Progress Institute / Demokratik Gelişim Enstitüsü DPI – Democratic Progress Institute is a charity registered in England and Wales. Registered Charity No. 1037236. Registered Company No. 2922108 DPI – Demokratik Gelişim Enstitüsü İngiltere ve galler’de kayıtlı bir vakıftır. Vakıf kayıt No. 1037236. Kayıtlı Şirket No. 2922108 This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable. Bu yayının telif hakları saklıdır, eğitim amacıyla telif ödenmeksizin yada önceden izin alınmaksızın çoğaltılabilir ancak yeniden satılamaz.
    [Show full text]
  • DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 10 September 2020
    DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 10 September 2020 MAP This map is presented for information only. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade accepts no responsibility for errors or omission of any geographic feature. Nomenclature and territorial boundaries may not necessarily reflect Australian government policy. Provided by the Commonwealth of Australia under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. DFAT Country Information Report Turkey SEPTEMBER 2020 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS 4 GLOSSARY 6 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 7 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 Recent History 8 Demography 9 Economic Overview 9 Political System 14 Human Rights Framework 16 Security Situation 18 3. REFUGEE CONVENTION CLAIMS 20 Race/Nationality 20 Religion 22 Political Opinion (Actual or imputed) 27 Groups of Interest 31 4. COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION CLAIMS 40 Arbitrary Deprivation of Life 40 Death Penalty 41 Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 41 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 45 State Protection 45 Internal Relocation 49 Treatment of Returnees 49 Documentation 50 DFAT Country Information Report Turkey SEPTEMBER 2020 3 ACRONYMS AKP Justice and Development Party (the ruling conservative political party) AKS Address Registration System BTK Information and Communication Technologies Authority CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women CHP Republican People’s Party (centre-left opposition political party) CMHC Community
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of the Peace Process with the Kurds in Turkey
    Back to Square One? The Collapse of the Peace Process with the Kurds in Turkey Gallia Lindenstrauss The Kurdish question is one of the fundamental problems, if not the most important, facing the Turkish republic. Since the 1980s, some 40,000 people have been killed in the violent struggle between Turkey’s central government and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, the PKK. Serious efforts were made to promote solutions during the tenure of President Turgut Ozal in the early 1990s, but since its rise to power in 2002, the Justice and Development Party has made the most progress on the issue compared to previous governments. Since 2008, and in greater intensity since the end of 2012, Turkey promoted a peace process between the government and the Kurdish minority. However, in July 2015, the process collapsed, leading to renewed violence between the sides, especially in the southeast of the country. Compared to the past, the PKK is putting more emphasis on urban warfare. Consequently, one of the Turkish army’s reactions to the renewed hostilities has been to impose an extended curfew on several neighborhoods and towns with a Kurdish majority, which severely disrupts the population’s routine of life. While past talks between the government and the Kurdish minority have also ended without a resolution and have seen the resumption of fighting, it seems that this time the escalation is more acute. Statements such as that made by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that Turkey’s objective is “to annihilate” the armed Kurds 1 raise concern that it will be extremely difficult to revive the peace process anytime soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • FSC Contents.Qxd
    HDP dossier_Template.qxd 08/02/2017 11:38 Page 28 28 THE END OF DEMOCRACY IN TURKEY AND THE NEW DICTATORSHIP INFORMATION FILE ON ARRESTED MPs OF PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC PARTY – HDP T Index: Ø Summary about the latest situation Ø Joint Defense Statement of Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) MPs Ø Profiles and Messages from the Arrested MP’s Ø Balance -sheet F or A ttacks on E lected R epresentatives and M unicipalities Ø Turkish State’s Cross Border Attacks into Rojava Go Up Seven -fold in One Year HDP dossier_Template.qxd 08/02/2017 11:38 Page 29 29 Summary about the latest situation On the 3rd of November, the purge of President Erdogan against our party has reached another peak: our Co -Chairs Selahattin Demirtas and Figen Y!ksekdag , along with ten further Members of Parliament (MP) of our party, namely Nursel Aydogan , Idris Baluken , Ley la Birlik , Ferhat Enc! , Selma Irmak, Sirri S!reyya "nder, Ziya Pir, Imam Tascier, G!lser Yildirim and Abdullah Zeydan have been detained across Turkey. Demirtas , Y!ksekdag, Aydogan, Baluken, Birlik, Enc!, Irmak, Zeydan , Nihat Akdogan and Yildirim HDP co -chair Demirtas brought to prison have been arrested by court order and sent to prison. Pir, "nder and Tascier have been released on probation. More arrests are to be expected. Within the scope of the operation, police also raided the HDP headquarters in Turkish capital Ankara and attacked the HDP deputies and members inside. Police later blocked all the roads leading to the building with barricades. Even the party members and deputies are not allowed access to the building amid intense measures and mobilization by police forces in large numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Civil War
    Revised Pages Anatomy of a Civil War Anatomy of a Civil War demonstrates the destructive nature of war, rang- ing from the physical destruction to a range of psychosocial problems to the detrimental effects on the environment. Despite such horrific aspects of war, evidence suggests that civil war is likely to generate multilayered outcomes. To examine the transformative aspects of civil war, Mehmet Gurses draws on an original survey conducted in Turkey, where a Kurdish armed group, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), has been waging an intermittent insurgency for Kurdish self- rule since 1984. Findings from a probability sample of 2,100 individuals randomly selected from three major Kurdish- populated provinces in the eastern part of Turkey, coupled with insights from face-to- face in- depth inter- views with dozens of individuals affected by violence, provide evidence for the multifaceted nature of exposure to violence during civil war. Just as the destructive nature of war manifests itself in various forms and shapes, wartime experiences can engender positive attitudes toward women, create a culture of political activism, and develop secular values at the individual level. Nonetheless, changes in gender relations and the rise of a secular political culture appear to be primarily shaped by wartime experiences interacting with insurgent ideology. Mehmet Gurses is Associate Professor of Political Science at Florida Atlantic University. Revised Pages Revised Pages ANATOMY OF A CIVIL WAR Sociopolitical Impacts of the Kurdish Conflict in Turkey Mehmet Gurses University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Revised Pages Copyright © 2018 by Mehmet Gurses All rights reserved This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Discourse of the Islamist Humor Magazines in Turkey: the Case of Misvak
    THE IDEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE OF THE ISLAMIST HUMOR MAGAZINES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF MISVAK A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY NAZLI HAZAL TETİK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MEDIA AND CULTURAL STUDIES JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Barış Çakmur Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Necmi Erdoğan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Özgür Avcı (METU, PADM) Prof. Dr. Necmi Erdoğan (METU, PADM) Prof. Dr. Lütfi Doğan Tılıç (Başkent Uni., ILF) PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Nazlı Hazal Tetik Signature: iii ABSTRACT THE IDEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE OF THE ISLAMIST HUMOR MAGAZINES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF MISVAK Tetik, Nazlı Hazal M.S., Department of Media and Cultural Studies Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Necmi Erdoğan July 2020, 259 pages This thesis focuses on the ideological discourse of Misvak, one of the most popular Islamist humor magazines in Turkey in the 2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2021 Report
    January 2021 Report 1. Administrative Bans, Police Intervention 01: Ankara Women’s Defense Network member B.U. was sent to court after being detained due to her social media post, which said, “The days we will burn this city down are close” on femicides on December 31, 2020. She was later released on January 1, 2021 with judicial measures. 01: Hakkâri The Governorate banned all protests and demonstrations for 15 days. 04: Ankara Someone protesting in front of Çankaya Social Health Center in order to be re- employed after having been dismissed with a Statutory Decree, was detained by the police with physical violence. 04: Istanbul The police detained 2 students protesting the appointment of a rector to Boğaziçi University by the President, using physical violence. 04: Van All protests and demonstrations to be organised in the province were banned for 15 days. 05: Ankara The police intervened against the protest organized by Ankara Women’s Platform for the first anniversary of the disappearance of Gülistan Doku, detaining 18 people including journalists. Those detained were released the same day after testifying at the police station. 05: Istanbul Two people, who were detained as they were protesting the rector appointment to Boğaziçi University, were searched naked and and they police used physical violence to take off their clothes because they didn’t accept being searched naked. 05: Istanbul The meeting of Boğaziçi University students, who were kept at the police station, with lawyer Eren Keskin wasn’t allowed. 05: Istanbul Warrants were issued against 11 students due to the protests at Boğaziçi University.
    [Show full text]