DOCSLIB.ORG

Post-ISIS States by Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Post-ISIS States by Dr Background Report VII: September 5, 2017 - April 30, 2018 Post-ISIS States By Dr. Gina Lennox Kurdish Lobby Australia Email: [email protected] Website: www.kurdishlobbyaustralia.com ©2018 Kurdish Lobby Australia You are welcome to share this report but please do not make changes without permission from Kurdish Lobby Australia. 1 Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 3 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 5 Why what is happening in the Middle East is relevant to Australia .......................... 9 What the Australian Government Can Do ........................................................................... 9 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 10 ISIS................................................................................................................................................... 10 Cost of War ................................................................................................................................... 11 Reconciliation and Reconstruction ..................................................................................... 14 FULL REPORT .................................................................................................................... 17 Iraq ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 17 ISIS................................................................................................................................................... 17 Iraqi Elections, May 12 ............................................................................................................ 19 Justice ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Reconstruction ........................................................................................................................... 25 Consequences of the Kurdistan Region’s Referendum on Independence ............. 26 Ways forward .............................................................................................................................. 35 Syria ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 36 War against ISIS ......................................................................................................................... 39 Raqqa ........................................................................................................................................................ 40 Deir Ezzor ............................................................................................................................................... 42 US announcements regarding its presence in Syria ............................................................. 47 Democratic Federation of Northern Syria ................................................................................ 49 ISIS in Hama, Homs, Idlib and Damascus .................................................................................. 51 Turkey’s invasion of Afrin ...................................................................................................... 52 Turkey’s offensives beyond Afrin ........................................................................................ 56 Civil War ........................................................................................................................................ 59 Eastern Ghouta, an alleged Chemical Attack, and the Response ..................................... 61 Idlib ........................................................................................................................................................... 65 Israel in Syria .............................................................................................................................. 70 Political Negotiations ............................................................................................................... 72 Reconstruction ........................................................................................................................... 76 Ways forward .............................................................................................................................. 78 Turkey ................................................................................................................................. 80 Conditions in Turkey in the lead up to elections, June 24 .......................................... 80 Armed conflict between the Turkish state and PKK ..................................................... 89 Are PKK terrorists? ................................................................................................................... 92 Turkey’s International Relations ......................................................................................... 93 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 103 Iran ..................................................................................................................................... 104 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 104 Widespread Protests from December 28 ....................................................................... 110 Ways forward ........................................................................................................................... 114 A Final Word .................................................................................................................... 114 2 Table of Figures Figure 1: Map of who controls what territory in northern Iraq and Syria .................... 5 Figure 2: Costs of Iran’s forward defence strategy ...................................................... 13 Figure 3: Iraqi forces converging on K-1 Military Base, Kirkuk, October 16, 2017 ...... 26 Figure 4: Map of disputed areas taken by military force in October 2017 ................. 28 Figure 5: Map of Syria showing zones of influence, March 30, 2018 .......................... 37 Figure 6: Map showing the location of major oil fields in Syria before the SDF took fields in Deir Ezzor held by ISIS .................................................................................... 43 Figure 7: Turkey-backed militants walking through Afrin city, March 18, 2018 ......... 53 Figure 9: Turkish soldier and Turkey-backed militants overlooking Afrin’s central square, March 18, 2018 ............................................................................................... 54 Figure 10: Destruction of the statue of Kawa, a legendary Kurdish figure, in Afrin’s central square, March 18, 2018 ................................................................................... 54 Figure 11: Map of de-escalation zones in Syria ........................................................... 59 Figure 12: Map of Idlib and Aleppo, before Turkey’s occupation of Afrin .................. 66 Figure 13: Casualties of armed conflict between Turkish security forces and PKK, 2015 – 2018 ................................................................................................................. 90 Figure 14: Map of NATO and US’ military presence in Turkey .................................. 102 3 Acronyms Asayish Kurdish police AKP Justice and Development Party (Turkey) CHP Republican People’s Party (Turkey) DBP Democratic Regions Party (Turkey) EU European Union GoI Government of Iraq HDP People’s Democratic Party (Turkey) HPG People’s Defence Force (Armed wing of PKK) HNC High Negotiation Committee (Saudi-backed Syrian opposition) HTS Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (coalition led by Jabhat Fatah al-Sham) ISIS Islamic State of Iraq and Syria IRGC Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps JFS Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, formerly called Al-Qaida/ Al-Nusra KDP/PDK Kurdistan Democratic Party (Iraq) KDPI Kurdistan Democratic Party (Iran) KNC/ENKS Kurdish National Council (KDP-linked coalition of parties) KPC Kirkuk Provincial Council KRG Kurdistan Regional Government (Iraq) KRI Kurdistan Region of Iraq MHP Nationalist Movement Party (Turkey) MIT National Intelligence Agency (Turkey) NGO Non-government organisation OPCW Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons PKK Kurdistan Workers Party (Turkey) PMUs Popular Mobilisation Units or Hashd al-Shaabi PUK Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (Iraq) PYD Democratic Union Party (Syria) SDF Syrian Democratic Forces SDC Syrian Democratic Council SNC Syrian National Coalition (Turkey-backed opposition) SOHR Syrian Observatory of Human Rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offensive Against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of a Campaign to Liberate the Area Near the Syrian-Turkish Border from ISIS
    June 23, 2016 Offensive against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of a Campaign to Liberate the Area near the Syrian-Turkish Border from ISIS Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) fighters at the western entrance to the city of Manbij (Fars, June 18, 2016). Overview 1. On May 31, 2016, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a Kurdish-dominated military alliance supported by the United States, initiated a campaign to liberate the northern Syrian city of Manbij from ISIS. Manbij lies west of the Euphrates, about 35 kilometers (about 22 miles) south of the Syrian-Turkish border. In the three weeks since the offensive began, the SDF forces, which number several thousand, captured the rural regions around Manbij, encircled the city and invaded it. According to reports, on June 19, 2016, an SDF force entered Manbij and occupied one of the key squares at the western entrance to the city. 2. The declared objective of the ground offensive is to occupy Manbij. However, the objective of the entire campaign may be to liberate the cities of Manbij, Jarabulus, Al-Bab and Al-Rai, which lie to the west of the Euphrates and are ISIS strongholds near the Turkish border. For ISIS, the loss of the area is liable to be a severe blow to its logistic links between the outside world and the centers of its control in eastern Syria (Al-Raqqah), Iraq (Mosul). Moreover, the loss of the region will further 112-16 112-16 2 2 weaken ISIS's standing in northern Syria and strengthen the military-political position and image of the Kurdish forces leading the anti-ISIS ground offensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Squaring the Circles in Syria's North East
    Squaring the Circles in Syria’s North East Middle East Report N°204 | 31 July 2019 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Search for Middle Ground ......................................................................................... 3 A. The U.S.: Caught between Turkey and the YPG ........................................................ 3 1. Turkey: The alienated ally .................................................................................... 4 2. “Safe zone” or dead end? The buffer debate ........................................................ 8 B. Moscow’s Missed Opportunity? ................................................................................. 11 C. The YPG and Damascus: Playing for Time ................................................................ 13 III. A War of Attrition with ISIS Remnants ........................................................................... 16 A. The SDF’s Approach to ISIS Detainees ..................................................................... 16 B. Deteriorating Relations between the SDF and Local Tribes ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Opposition to the Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)
    Country Policy and Information Note Iraq: Opposition to the government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Version 2.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Orchestrating Violence Beyond Borders
    TURKEY: ORCHESTRATING VIOLENCE BEYOND BORDERS By RETHINKING Mohammed Sami POLICY BRIEF Middle East Analyst January 2020 SECURITY IN 2020 SERIES INTRODUCTION KEY TAKEAWAYS In late December 2019, the Tripoli based-UN backed- • Turkey continues its deployment of Government of National Accord (GNA) appealed for Syrian rebels to Libya. Turkey to intervene in Libya. As a response, the Turkish rd Parliament held an emergency session on January 3 , • Syrian rebels are deployed with attractive 2020, and voted to authorize President Recep Tayep Er- salaries to fight in Libya. dogan to deploy Turkish troops to Libya. Soon after, the deployment of troops materialized. However, not only • The selection process of rebels was based were Turkish military forces deployed but Syrian rebels on a specific criterion. from northern Syria too. In recent months, Turkey’s military activities, such as its expatriation of Syrian ref- • Private military contractors played a role in ugees to their war-torn country and the deployment of preparing and deploying Syrian rebels to Turkish-backed Syrian rebels to fight along the GNA in Libya. Libya, pose serious risks of escalation in the region. While the European Union remains committed to fund its Facility for Refugees in Turkey, these activities re- local activists, partners, and local population, this pol- quire greater scrutiny on its financial support provided icy brief explores Turkey’s deployment of Syrian rebels to Turkey. Based on first-hand data collected through to Libya, its deportation of refugees to Syria and ques- interviews conducted by the BIC research team with tions the implications these developments have on the EU’s Facility for Refugees in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian War at the Crossroads
    \ POLICY BRIEF 4 \ 2020 Syrian war at the crossroads Curbing arms flow, imposing a no-fly zone and opening al-Yarubiyah border crossing Lena Schellhammer, Marius Bales \ BICC Policy recommendations to EU member states \ Impose a comprehensive arms embargo \ Establish a UN-mandated no-fly zone in to secondary conflict parties northern Syria Suspend the transfer of weapons, ammunition and To stop the cycle of mass displacement and attacks military equipment to secondary conflict parties, such against civilians, a UN-mandated no-fly zone must be as Turkey and Saudi Arabia, to stop illegal re-transfers established in northern Syria. If a no-fly zone is not to the Syrian war zone. Existing national agreements successful in protecting civilians in northern Syria, a to suspend certain arms exports to Turkey (2019) by UN-mandated safe zone must also be considered and Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, France, the United ultimately implemented. Kingdom and Germany, as well as the export moratoria of limited duration for Saudi Arabia (2018), should be \ Extend humanitarian cross-border aid extended to a comprehensive, not time-limited EU (UNSCR 2165) and reopen the al-Yarubiyah arms embargo. border crossing EU member states must call on the UN Security Council \ Buy and destroy the still existing stocks to vote for continuing humanitarian cross-border aid of former Yugoslav weapons (UNSCR 2165) and to reopen the al-Yarubiyah border Many of the weapons that are re-exported to Syria are crossing with Iraq in north-eastern Syria to prevent old arms, produced in former Yugoslavian countries or the humanitarian situation from deteriorating further.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region
    KURDISTAN RISING? CONSIDERATIONS FOR KURDS, THEIR NEIGHBORS, AND THE REGION Michael Rubin AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region Michael Rubin June 2016 American Enterprise Institute © 2016 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20036 www.aei.org. Cover image: Grand Millennium Sualimani Hotel in Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, by Diyar Muhammed, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons. Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Who Are the Kurds? 5 2. Is This Kurdistan’s Moment? 19 3. What Do the Kurds Want? 27 4. What Form of Government Will Kurdistan Embrace? 56 5. Would Kurdistan Have a Viable Economy? 64 6. Would Kurdistan Be a State of Law? 91 7. What Services Would Kurdistan Provide Its Citizens? 101 8. Could Kurdistan Defend Itself Militarily and Diplomatically? 107 9. Does the United States Have a Coherent Kurdistan Policy? 119 Notes 125 Acknowledgments 137 About the Author 139 iii Executive Summary wo decades ago, most US officials would have been hard-pressed Tto place Kurdistan on a map, let alone consider Kurds as allies. Today, Kurds have largely won over Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehmet Yuksel the Representative to The
    MEHMET YUKSEL THE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED STATES OFFICE PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC PARTY (HDP) IN TURKEY. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE, EURASIA, AND EMERGING THREATS HEARING: “TURKEY’S DEMOCRACY UNDER CHALLENGE” APRIL 5, 2017 Dear Honorable Chairman Dana Rohrabacher and distinguished members of the House Subcommittee, It is an honor for me to testify today on a crucial development in Turkey. I would like to discuss a few major threats to democracy and rule of law in Turkey. The constitutional amendments that are proposed by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the ruling AK Party projects an authoritarian system of governance, whereby absolute power is held by a single person. Even though the proposed constitutional amendments have not been legally accepted, the amendments have been implemented and practiced under the State of Emergency Rule. Let me enlist several indications of this extralegal, single-person rule: Since the failed coup attempt in July 2016, the immunity of 55 out of 59 HDP law makers has been removed. Following this, 11 HDP deputies have been arrested, including the Co-Chair Selahattin Demirtas and Co-Chair Figen Yüksekdag. The freedom of speech that democracy supports and Turkey’s Constitution guarantees is the basic allegation against Co-Chair Demirtas for what he is subjected to over 500 years of detention. Between July 22, 2015, and March, 27 2017, 8,930 HDP members were detained; and 2782 party members have been imprisoned. 494 HDP offices have been attacked; burned or vandalized, including the party headquarters. HDP rallies were attacked and law enforcement’s support for these attacks have been widely documented, even on social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting-For-Kurdistan.Pdf
    Fighting for Kurdistan? Assessing the nature and functions of the Peshmerga in Iraq CRU Report Feike Fliervoet Fighting for Kurdistan? Assessing the nature and functions of the Peshmerga in Iraq Feike Fliervoet CRU Report March 2018 March 2018 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: Peshmerga, Kurdish Army © Flickr / Kurdishstruggle Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Feike Fliervoet is a Visiting Research Fellow at Clingendael’s Conflict Research Unit where she contributes to the Levant research programme, a three year long project that seeks to identify the origins and functions of hybrid security arrangements and their influence on state performance and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomperud I Bagdad
    Fagfellevurdert artikkel A˚ rgang 74 | Nr. 3 | 2016 | ISSN 1891-5580 Stomperud i Bagdad Cecilie Hellestveit*, PhD, Seniorforsker, International Law and Policy Institute Artikkelen foretar en analyse av Norges militære bidrag i Irak fra 2015 med utgangspunkt i folkerettens regler for militære utenlandsoppdrag. Artikkelen argumenterer for at de folkerettslige rammene for det norske militære bidraget i Irak pa˚ et par vesentlige punkter skiller seg fra andre nyere norske militære utenlandsoperasjoner. Den peker pa˚ tre utfordringer som det norske militære engasjementet i Irak derfor medfører: notoriteten til det militære oppdraget innad og utad, rettssikkerheten til norske soldater, og effektiviteten til soldater i en prekær rettslig situasjon. Stikkord: folkerett × maktbruk × Irak × Syria × IS × norske militære utlandsoperasjoner The article analyses the Norwegian military contribution to Iraq initiated in 2015 from the perspective of international law regulating military operations on foreign soil. It argues that this military operation is distinguished from other Norwegian military expeditions in recent decades. The article draws attention to three challenges that consequently arise: a low level of clarity concerning the nature and scope of the assignment, lack of legal guarantees calibrated to the tasks of the soldiers and finally poor efficiency resulting from a precarious legal situation. Innledning Den norske regjeringen besluttet i oktober 2014 a˚ sende 120 norske soldater til Irak for a˚ «bidra til a˚ trene opp irakiske sikkerhetsstyrker» (Solberg 2014). Fra april 2015 er en kontingent stasjonert i den kurdiske provinshovedstaden Irbil, formelt underlagt sikkerhetsstyrkene til den autonome kurdiske regionen i Nord-Irak (KRG), mens en annen er stasjonert i hovedstaden Bagdad. Militærpersonalet skal støtte irakiske sentralmyndigheter og kurdiske regionale myndigheter i kampen for a˚ gjenerobre territorium fra organisasjonen Islamsk Stat (IS), som i 2015 kontrollerte ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdish Islamists in Iraq 5
    5 Kurdish Islamists in Iraq from the MuslimBrotherhood to the So-Called Islamic State: Shaban 1436 June 2015 Continuity or Departure? Mohammed Shareef Visiting Lecturer, Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, University of Exeter Kurdish Islamists in Iraq from the Muslim Brotherhood to the So-Called Islamic State: Continuity or Departure? Mohammed Shareef Visiting Lecturer, Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, University of Exeter العدد - )اﻷول( 4 No. 5 June 2015 © King Faisal Center for research and Islamic Studies, 2015 King Fahd National Library Catalging-In-Publication Data King Faisal Center for research and Islamic Studies Dirasat: Kurdish Islamists in Iraq from the Muslim Brotherhood to the So-Called Islamic State: Continuity or Departure? / King Faisal Center for research and Islamic Studies - Riyadh, 2015 p 44; 16.5x23cm (Dirasat; 5) ISBN: 978-603-8032-65-7 1- Kurds - Iraq - Politics and government - History I- Title 956 dc 1436/6051 L.D. no. 1436/7051 ISBN: 978-603-8032-65-7 Designer: Azhari Elneiri Disclaimer: This paper and its contents reflect the author’s analyses and opinions. Views and opinions contained herein are the author’s and should not be attributed to any officials affiliated with the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies or any Saudi Arabian national. The author is solely responsible for any errors that remain in the document. Table of Contents Abstract 5 Introduction 7 Kurdish Islamist Parties and the So-Called Islamic State 10 The Muslim Brotherhood and the Beginnings of Islamism in Kurdistan 13 The Emergence of Indigenous Kurdish Islamist Groups 19 The Islamic Movement of Kurdistan and Ansar al-Islam after 1991 27 Kurds in the So-Called Islamic State 35 Bibliography 39 Author Biography 40 3 4 No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Precariousness of the De-Escalation Zones in Syria
    The Precariousness of the De-Escalation Zones in Syria Mustafa Gurbuz May 10, 2017 Although the Russia-Turkey-Iran agreement on Given the fact that neither the Assad regime nor de-escalation zones in Syria was announced the Syrian opposition has signed the recent with boastful statements, ongoing clashes on agreement, maintaining the de-escalation zones the designated zones point to serious could be an arduous task. Three major problems impediments in implementing the ceasefire on arise (1) the Assad regime’s militaristic the ground. “We as guarantors…will do interpretation of the agreement and reluctance everything for this to work,” declared Russian to provide “rapid, safe and unhindered President Vladimir Putin in his meeting with humanitarian access” and “measures to restore Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who basic infrastructure facilities,” which are stated in turn said that the agreement will solve “50 as essential elements in the agreement, (2) the percent of the Syrian issue.” The Syrian opposition’s deep skepticism and internal opposition groups, however, criticized the divisions, and (3) the potential provocations by overall Astana process, noting that the de- Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and other al-Qaida escalation zones could result in partitioning affiliates to disrupt the process. These are “the country through vague meanings.” nestled among the rebels in all proposed de- escalation zones and are most powerful in the According to a statement from the Russian Idlib region and its surroundings—a critical Foreign Ministry, the agreement suggests that zone that could determine the fate of the the guarantor states—Russia-Turkey-Iran— agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Contributions to Countering the Islamic State
    Coalition Contributions to Countering the Islamic State Kathleen J. McInnis Analyst in International Security Updated August 24, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44135 Coalition Contributions to Countering the Islamic State Contents The Global Campaign to Counter the Islamic State ........................................................................ 1 Counter-IS Coalition Mandate......................................................................................................... 2 Military Aspects of the Coalition .................................................................................................... 2 NATO ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Russia ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Turkey ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Challenges to Coalition Coherence ........................................................................................... 6 Figures Figure 1. Operation Inherent Resolve: Average U.S. Daily Costs, by Month ................................. 3 Figure 2. Country Participation at Training and Capacity Building Bases in Iraq .......................... 7 Tables Table 1. Military Coalition Contributions to Countering the Islamic State ....................................
    [Show full text]