DOCSLIB.ORG

Does the Web Create a Pathway to Political Engagement for Young People?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does the Web Create a Pathway to Political Engagement for Young People? THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER - APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED THESIS/DISSERTATION COVER-PAGE Electronic identifier: 15188 Date of electronic submission: 26/06/2015 The University of Manchester makes unrestricted examined electronic theses and dissertations freely available for download and reading online via Manchester eScholar at http://www.manchester.ac.uk/escholar. This print version of my thesis/dissertation is a TRUE and ACCURATE REPRESENTATION of the electronic version submitted to the University of Manchester's institutional repository, Manchester eScholar. Approved electronically generated cover-page version 1.0 DOES THE WEB CREATE A PATHWAY TO POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT FOR YOUNG PEOPLE? AN EXAMINATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF ELECTORAL WEBSITES ON POLITICAL ATTITUDES, BEHAVIOUR AND COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT. A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in Social Change in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Cheryl Anderson School of Social Sciences 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 17 1.1 Electoral engagement and theoretical perspectives ............................................................ 17 1.1.1 Is turnout declining among young people? .................................................................. 17 1.1.2 Explanations for youth (dis)engagement ...................................................................... 22 1.1.3 What can be done to increase youth turnout? ............................................................. 36 1.2 The web and political engagement ....................................................................................... 40 1.2.1 Why the web? ............................................................................................................... 40 1.2.2 The web and engagement ................................................................................................... 43 1.2.2 Websites and engagement .................................................................................................. 45 1.3 Mobilization websites ........................................................................................................... 47 1.3.1 Youth mobilization websites ......................................................................................... 48 1.3.2 Candidate websites .............................................................................................................. 51 1.3.3 Vote Advice Applications .............................................................................................. 55 1.4 Mobilization websites: a pathway to participation for young people? ................................ 61 Chapter 2: Data and Methods............................................................................................................... 65 2.1 Website identification and content analysis .............................................................................. 66 2.2. Online survey and experiment ................................................................................................... 72 2.2.1 User experience and evaluation .......................................................................................... 78 2.3 Testing website effects ............................................................................................................... 81 2.3.1 Independent variables ......................................................................................................... 81 2.4 Ethical considerations ................................................................................................................. 86 2.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 87 Chapter 3: Content analysis .................................................................................................................. 88 3.1 Youth mobilization and candidate websites in the 2012 elections ............................................ 92 3.1.1 Overall website scores: youth mobilization and candidate sites ......................................... 93 3.1.2 Design and functionality ...................................................................................................... 97 3.1.3 Information provision: candidate and issues ....................................................................... 99 3.1.4 Information provision: election and voting ....................................................................... 103 3.1.5 Content interactivity .......................................................................................................... 106 3.1.5 Interpersonal interactivity ................................................................................................. 109 3.1.6 Candidate and youth mobilization website summary ....................................................... 111 3.2 VAA sites ................................................................................................................................... 116 2 3.2.1 Overall scores and design and functionality ...................................................................... 116 3.2.2 Information provision ........................................................................................................ 122 3.2.3 Interactivity and Mobilization ............................................................................................ 126 3.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 129 Chapter 4: Impact, evaluation and experience of the websites ......................................................... 131 4.1 Candidate websites ................................................................................................................... 132 4.2 Youth Mobilization websites ..................................................................................................... 139 4.3 VAAs .......................................................................................................................................... 154 4.4 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 168 Chapter 5: Website effects ................................................................................................................. 173 5.1 Vote ........................................................................................................................................... 175 5.2 Attention to news ..................................................................................................................... 177 5.3 Political attitudes ...................................................................................................................... 181 5.3.1 Internal Efficacy.................................................................................................................. 183 5.3.2 External Efficacy ................................................................................................................. 192 5.3.3 Trust ................................................................................................................................... 203 5.5 Chapter summary...................................................................................................................... 209 Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusion ................................................................................................ 214 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................ 223 Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... 245 3 List of Figures Figure 1: Voter Turnout in the UK 1964-2010 (British Election Study) ................................................. 20 Figure 2: Voter Turnout in the US 1952-2012 (American National Election Study) ............................. 21 Figure 3: Outline of online experiment ................................................................................................. 76 Figure 4: Overall website scores for youth mobilization and candidates sites, London ...................... 95 Figure 5: Overall website scores for youth mobilization and candidate scores, US ............................. 96 Figure 6: Design features in youth mobilization and candidate websites, London .............................. 98 Figure 7: Design features in youth mobilization and candidate websites, US ...................................... 99 Figure 8: Information provision on issues and candidates on youth mobilization and candidate websites, London ................................................................................................................................ 101 Figure 9: Information provision on issues and candidates on youth mobilization and candidate websites, US ........................................................................................................................................ 102 Figure 10: Provision of election information on youth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Support – Strategisches Planungs- Und Entscheidungsinstrument
    Do Policy Impact Assessment Processes Promote Stringent Environmental Policy? A Comparative Analysis between Great Britain and Germany Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades einer Doktorin der Philosophie am Fachbereich Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Johanna Ferretti Berlin, 2017 GutachterInnen: Dr. Klaus Jacob Prof. Dr. Thurid Hustedt Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 17.11.2017 Acknowledgement/Danksagung I would like to thank the following persons for supporting my work: First, Dr Klaus Jacob for the many ideas on my work and the critical supervision of my thesis. Thank you also to Prof Thurid Hustedt for the friendly and uncomplicated takeover of supervisioning my thesis. I would also like to extend my thanks to Prof Philipp Lepenies, Dr Kerstin Tews for serving as committee members, and notably Dr Sabine Weiland for the many fruitful discussions and comments on my work. Thank you also to my interview partners in England and Germany for taking the time to share your exciting insights and knowledge on the policy and IA processes, and your expertise on envi- ronmental policies with me. In regards to my research stay at the Tyndall Centre/University of East Anglia, Norwich I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Andrew Jordan for hosting me and notably Viviane Gravey and Jonas Schoenefeld for making my stay so enjoyable and fun. I am especially grateful for my family’s and friends’ support and interest in my work, my mother and my sister Ulli and Kien, Ingrid Hu ttemeier, Maike Grube, Conrad, and Katrin Daedlow. I would like to express special thanks to my friend Aranka Podhora for her unwavering support throughout my work.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Acknowledgement Booklet
    Copyright Acknowledgement Booklet For the June 2015 exam series This booklet contains the acknowledgements for third-party copyright material used in OCR assessment materials for GCE & GCSE Qualifications. www.ocr.org.uk About the Copyright Acknowledgement Booklet Prior to the June 2009 examination series, acknowledgements for third-party copyright material were printed on the back page of the relevant exam papers and associated assessment materials. For security purposes, from that series onwards, OCR has created this separate booklet to include all of the acknowledgements, rather than including them in the exam papers or associated assessment materials. The booklet is published after each examination series, as soon as the assessment materials become available to the public. It is available online from the OCR website at: http://www.ocr.org.uk/i-want-to/download-past-papers/conditions-of-use/ The Assessment Material Production Team can be contacted by post at 1 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB1 2EU, or by email at [email protected]. Where possible, OCR has sought and cleared permission to reproduce items of third-party owned copyright material. Every reasonable effort has been made by OCR to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, please contact the Assessment Material Production Team at the addresses above and OCR will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity. How to find an acknowledgement Each acknowledgement is filed firstly by subject and then under the unit number of the exam paper in which the copyright material appears. Where an exam paper has more than one document associated with it, each document is identified with its separate acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • London Elections Poll Prepared on Behalf of the Daily Telegraph
    London Elections Poll Prepared on behalf of The Daily Telegraph Contents Methodology.............................................................................................................................2 Data Tables............................................................................................................................. 3 Prepared by Survation on behalf of The Daily Telegraph Fieldwork Dates: 18 – 24th April 2012 Data Collection Method: The survey was conducted via online panel. Invitations to complete surveys were sent out to members of the panel. Differential response rates from different demographic groups were taken into account. Population Sampled: All adults aged 18+ living in Greater London Total Sample Size: 1443 Data Weighting: Data were weighted to the profile of all adults aged 18+. Data were weighted by sex, age, socio-economic group, and region. Targets for the weighted data were derived from the National Readership Survey, a random probability survey comprising 36,000 random face-to-face interviews conducted annually. Data were weighted by Pamela Varley and analysed and presented by Patrick Briône Charlotte Jee of Survation. For further information please contact: Damian Lyons Lowe Chief Executive Survation Ltd 020 7490 4094 [email protected] Survation are a member of The British Polling Council and abide by its rules: http://www.britishpollingcouncil.org Survation Ltd Registered in England and Wales Number 07143509 Prepared by Survation on behalf of The Daily Telegraph Which party
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 July 16.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Tuesday 16 July 2013 7 Ramadan 1434 - Volume 18 Number 5762 Price: QR2 QIIB posts Man Utd make QR366m $38m bid for H1 profit Fabregas: Reports Business | 17 Sport | 24 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 Al Jazeera wins Driving licence EPL rights for three years DOHA: Al Jazeera television curbs only for said yesterday it has secured the rights to air the English Premier League across the Middle East and North Africa for a further three years, limited period extending to 2015-2016. The pan-Arab network said the agreement makes it the “exclu- sive media rights holder to all 380 Ban due to road projects: Al Kharji Barclays Premier League matches across all media platforms and DOHA: The ban on some cat- by a traffic policeman in assessing devices in the MENA region that egories of expatriate workers a traffic accident. In those cases a comprises 23 countries”. from acquiring a driving licence lenient view can be taken.” “We are extremely excited is temporary and will last On an average, some 100 driv- by the addition of the Barclays only until major development ing licences are withdrawn by Premier League for the next three projects are completed, says the the traffic police every day due year cycle, the value that this can Traffic Department. to serious violations of the traf- add to our customer proposition The nature of work of these fic law. and extending further our port- categories of people is such that In Qatar, the minimum age for folio of top European football,” they do not “at the moment” need issuing the driving licence is 19 Al Jazeera Sport chairman a driving licence, said the director years while in other countries in Nasser Al Khelaifi said in a of the department.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Decision of the Election Committee on a Due Impartiality Complaint
    Decision of the Election Committee on a Due Impartiality Complaint Brought by Siobhan Benita in relation to The Battle for London – The Mayoral Debate, ITV1, 24 April 2012 1 On Monday 30 April 2012, Ofcom‟s Election Committee (“the Committee”) met to consider and adjudicate upon a complaint made on behalf of Siobhan Benita, the independent candidate in the London Mayoral Election. The complaint was about the broadcast of The Battle for London – The Mayoral Debate (“the Mayoral Debate”) broadcast on the ITV1 network (in all its English regions) at 22:35 on 24 April 2012. The complaint was made by email dated 25 April 2012 (the “Complaint”) from Siobhan Benita. The Committee consisted of the following members: Tim Gardam (Chairman of the Committee, Chairman of the Ofcom Content Board); Anthony Lilley (Member of Ofcom‟s Content Board); Glyn Mathias (Member for Wales of Ofcom‟s Content Board); Janey Walker (Member of Ofcom‟s Content Board); and Christopher Woolard (Ofcom Group Director with responsibility for Content, International and Regulatory Development and Member of Ofcom‟s Content Board). For the reasons set out below, having considered all the submissions and evidence before it under the relevant provisions of the Broadcasting Code (“the Code”), the Committee decided that Siobhan Benita‟s complaint should not be upheld, that the broadcast of the Mayoral Debate complied with the requirements of the Code and that no remedial action was required on the part of ITV licensees. Background The Battle for London – The Mayoral Debate The Mayoral Debate was a 65-minute live factual programme featuring the candidates in the current London Mayoral Election of the Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green parties in debate on policy matters affecting London based on questions put by members of the 1 The Committee‟s Terms of Reference are available at: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/how-ofcom-is- run/committees/election-committee/terms-of-reference/ 1 studio audience and moderated by the presenter, Alastair Stewart.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Study 2014
    Economics at Warwick Undergraduate Study 2014 Economics at Warwick is ranked No 1 in the UK in the Complete University Guide, is one of the top Departments in Europe and in the top 3 for research (RAE 2008). Our standards are high, we are looking for the best. And you should be too. It’s time to choose wisely… Undergraduate Study 2014 warwick.ac.uk/economics 03 Economics at Warwick Quality attracts quality For students wishing to begin their University career, the Department of Economics at The University of Warwick is the perfect destination. We attract students from all around the world due to our reputation for offering rigorous and exciting training which provides our graduates with a distinct career advantage. Our aim is to ensure that not only will you graduate with a degree from one of the best Economics departments, but that you will reach your full potential during your time here. As well as being taught by top class teachers and researchers, we work hard to make your experience memorable and to provide you with valuable opportunities to enhance your CV and provide you with a flying start to your career. In less than 50 years, the Department has become one of the leading Economics departments in Europe at the forefront of economic research and education; we are ranked first in the UK for the proportion of research meriting the top rankings in the most recent Research Assessment Exercise (2008). We expect our research reputation to be confirmed in the next REF (Research Excellence Framework). Dynamism, vision and energy were the essence of our founding mission, and they remain at the core of our present and our future.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Election Statistics: 1918- 2021: a Century of Elections
    By Sam Pilling, RIchard Cracknell UK Election Statistics: 1918- 18 August 2021 2021: A Century of Elections 1 Introduction 2 General elections since 1918 3 House of Commons by-elections 4 European Parliament elections (UK) 5 Elections to devolved legislatures and London elections 6 Local Elections 7 Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) Elections 8 Referendums 9 Appendix A: Voting systems and electoral geographies used in the UK elections commonslibrary.parliament.uk Number CBP7529 UK Election Statistics: 1918-2021: A Century of Elections Image Credits Autumn colours at Westminster by Manish Prabhune. Licensed by CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. Disclaimer The Commons Library does not intend the information in our research publications and briefings to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. We have published it to support the work of MPs. You should not rely upon it as legal or professional advice, or as a substitute for it. We do not accept any liability whatsoever for any errors, omissions or misstatements contained herein. You should consult a suitably qualified professional if you require specific advice or information. Read our briefing ‘Legal help: where to go and how to pay’ for further information about sources of legal advice and help. This information is provided subject to the conditions of the Open Parliament Licence. Feedback Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publicly available briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Violence Commission Interim Report – July 2018
    The Youth Violence Commission Interim Report – July 2018 THE YOUTH VIOLENCE COMMISSION: INTERIM REPORT – JULY 2018 1 Forward from Vicky Foxcroft, Chair of the Youth Violence Commission and Member of Parliament for Lewisham Deptford Youth violence has devastating consequences for other groups and organisations who are working to individuals, families, communities and society at large. tackle youth violence and related issues, including the As the MP for Lewisham Deptford, I have personally APPG on Knife Crime1 and the Science and Technology witnessed the destruction of too many young inquiry into evidence-based, early-years intervention.2 lives and bright futures. London is experiencing Our Commissioners include Labour, Conservative, a particularly tragic year but the issue of youth SNP and Liberal Democrat MPs (See Annex A). Most violence is not confined to the capital alone. It is a recently, we welcomed the Government’s Serious national issue. It is also a national shame because the Violence Strategy. We were particularly pleased to violence, injuries and deaths are preventable. see the Government recognising: the impact on young people of childhood trauma and adverse experiences, The Youth Violence Commission was established the importance of early intervention in preventing to identify solutions. Through the work that the violence later in life and the need for greater integration Commissioners and our core team have undertaken of services (what is often termed the “public health over the past two years, we are now in a position to start approach”). We would, however, like to see the Strategy articulating our recommendations. The Commission going further and faster in key areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2016 Mayoral Elections in London Timothy Whitton
    ”My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London Timothy Whitton To cite this version: Timothy Whitton. ”My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2017, The May 2016 Devolved Elections in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and London: Convergences and Divergences, XXXII (4). hal-01912519 HAL Id: hal-01912519 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01912519 Submitted on 5 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Timothy WHITTON “My Dad was a bus driver”. The 2016 mayoral elections in London In May 2016 Sadiq Khan became the first “British” Muslim to be elected mayor of a European capital city, ushering in a new era of politics in London which will undoubtedly contrast starkly with the respective reigns of Ken Livingstone (2000 – 2008) and Boris Johnson (2008 – 2016). To his great pride, Livingstone had defied and to some extent beaten both Thatcher and Blair becoming the first directly elected mayor of London in May 2000 after running as an independent candidate.1 He renewed his victory in 2004 with the success of the Congestion Charge, this time round as New Labour’s candidate, but lost in 2008 to Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson and in 2012 when the incumbent piped him once again to the post.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Decision of the Election Committee on a Due Impartiality
    Decision of the Election Committee on a Due Impartiality Complaint Brought by Siobhan Benita in relation to The London Debate, Sky News, 19 April 20121 2 On Monday 30 April 2012, Ofcom’s Election Committee (“the Committee”) met to consider and adjudicate upon a complaint made on behalf of Siobhan Benita, the independent candidate in the London Mayoral Election. The complaint was about the broadcast of The London Debate (“the Programme”) broadcast on Sky News at 20:00 on 19 April 2012. The complaint was made by email dated 25 April 2012 (the “Complaint”) from Siobhan Benita. The Committee consisted of the following members: Tim Gardam (Chairman of the Committee, Chairman of the Ofcom Content Board); Anthony Lilley (Member of Ofcom’s Content Board); Glyn Mathias (Member for Wales of Ofcom’s Content Board); Janey Walker (Member of Ofcom’s Content Board); and Christopher Woolard (Ofcom Group Director with responsibility for Content, International and Regulatory Development and Member of Ofcom’s Content Board). For the reasons set out below, having considered all the submissions and evidence before it under the relevant provisions of the Broadcasting Code (“the Code”), the Committee decided that Siobhan Benita’s complaint should not be upheld and that the broadcast of the Programme complied with the requirements of the Code and that no remedial action was required on the part of Sky News. Background The London Debate The Programme was a two-hour live factual programme featuring debate on policy matters affecting London and consisted of two halves: the first half of the Programme consisted of a debate (“the Debate”) between the candidates in the current London Mayoral Election of the 1 This Decision was retaken by the Committee on 1 May 2012 after the complainant raised with Ofcom a factual inaccuracy in Head B of the Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Election Statistics: 1918–2012
    UK Election Statistics: 1918-2012 RESEARCH PAPER 12/43 7 August 2012 This paper presents an overview of results from UK elections since 1918. It includes summary results for general elections and parliamentary by-elections; local government elections including elected mayors; elections to the European Parliament and devolved bodies; and results from referendums. Data are also provided on the social backgrounds of Members elected to the House of Commons. Feargal McGuinness Recent Research Papers 12/30 Defamation Bill [Bill 5 of 2012-13] 28.05.12 12/31 Inflation: the value of the pound 1750-2011 29.05.12 12/32 Economic Indicators, June 2012 07.06.12 12/33 Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill [Bill 7 of 2012-13] 07.06.12 12/34 Unemployment by Constituency, June 2012 20.06.12 12/35 Bank of England (Appointment of Governor) Bill [Bill 8 of 2012-13] 03.07.12 12/36 Economic Indicators, July 2012 03.07.12 12/37 House of Lords Reform Bill [Bill 52 of 2012-13] 04.07.12 12/38 Olympic Britain 10.07.12 12/39 Scrap Metal Dealers Bill [Bill 9 of 2012-13] 10.07.12 12/40 The Supporting People programme 16.07.12 12/41 Unemployment by Constituency, July 2012 18.07.12 12/42 Economic Indicators, August 2012 07.08.12 Research Paper 12/43 This paper replaces Library Research Paper 08/12 Election Statistics: UK 1918-2012. Contributing Authors: Feargal McGuinness Richard Cracknell Martin Davies Mark Taylor This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • The Candidates Whatthe the Elections Candidates Are About • How to Vote How to Vote What the Election Is About Have Your Say - Vote 3Rd May
    MAYOR OF LONDON & LONDON ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS THE CANDIDATES WHATTHE THE ELECTIONS CANDIDATES ARE ABOUT • HOW TO VOTE HOW TO VOTE WHAT THE ELECTION IS ABOUT HAVE YOUR SAY - VOTE 3RD MAY londonelects.org.uk CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction 03 On Thursday 3rd May you can vote for the Mayor of London and the 25 members of the London Assembly. The Mayor of London 04 The Mayor of London and the London Assembly make decisions on aspects Mayor of London candidates 05 of your everyday life in London including transport, policing, housing, the Lawrence Webb, Fresh Choice for London 06 environment, and fire & emergency planning. Carlos Cortiglia, British National Party 08 I am required by law to send this booklet to every registered elector in London. Inside you will find information about the elections, including mini-manifestos Siobhan Benita 10 from candidates standing for Mayor of London, and names of all the candidates Brian Paddick, London Liberal Democrats 12 standing for the London Assembly. Boris Johnson, The Conservative Party Candidate 14 You will also find information about how to fill in your ballot papers and how the results are calculated. Jenny Jones, Green Party 16 Ken Livingstone, The Labour Party Candidate 18 The Mayor of London candidates The London Assembly 20 There are seven candidates standing for Mayor of London. They will be listed on the pink ballot paper alphabetically. Please see overleaf for the candidate Constituencies 21 names. Constituency London Assembly Member candidates 22 All of the candidates were invited to put their mini-manifesto in this booklet in London-wide Assembly Member candidates 27 return for the £10,000 contribution towards the costs which the law requires.
    [Show full text]