DOCSLIB.ORG

Please Renew Interim Regulations Without Any Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Please Renew Interim Regulations Without Any Amendments From: Richard Berkowitz <RBerkowitz@trans‐inst.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 3:31 PM To: City Clerk's Office Subject: Please Renew Interim Regulations without any Amendments Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Mayor Woodards and Tacoma City Council Members, The Transportation Institute (TI) works on behalf of the interests of the US-Flag Maritime Industry. Our members include Crowley Maritime, Matson Navigation, and TOTE, Inc. –all of whom currently own assets propelled by LNG and also operate vessels in and near the Port of Tacoma. TI has long supported local efforts to reduce emissions and, notably, particulate matter (PM) that has long plagued areas of Pierce County to the point where the region surpassed its EPA limits. We find it illogical for there to be new found calls to limit the potential for the needed infrastructure in and near the Port of Tacoma that would allow access to LNG by our member companies, other vessel operators, and fleet transport providers. These are some of the same companies who have long invested in the Port of Tacoma/trade gateway and regional economy and assure family-wage jobs are available to its residents. It is anticipated that 30 percent of vessel operators will be requiring LNG as their primary propulsion fuel in the years following the implementation of international marine fuel sulfur limits to be in place in 2020. The Port of Tacoma is the economic engine for this region and not to have access to LNG would place the port in a precarious state to retain and attract ships and the trade that supports our state. Changing the rules midstream on companies who have taken the bold risk of investing in a clean propulsion alternative would be a terrible message for policymakers to send to them and all who wish to support bold steps in technology and environmental remediation. Consequently, we urge you to keep the existing regulations in place until the full planning process, involving all stakeholders and the community, is initiated and completed. I appreciate your attention and consideration of this critical matter. Best wishes, Richard Berkowitz Director, Pacific Coast Operations Transportation Institute 2200 Alaskan Way #110 Seattle WA 98121 206‐443‐1738 www.transportationinstitute.org From: Chris heiberg <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 2:20 PM To: City Clerk's Office Cc: [email protected]; '[email protected]'; Randy Heiberg ([email protected]); Chris heiberg; Chris heiberg Subject: Amended Ordinance 28470 Tideflat Interim Regulations Attachments: 3rd response request Interim Tideflat Regulations 4‐23‐2017.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged To whom it may concern, Please find attached my written comment to be included in the Tideflat Interim Regulation meeting of 4/23/19. Sincerely, Barbara Ardelle Heiberg Amended Ordinance 28470 Tideflat Interim Regulations->3rd response request Interim Tideflat Regulations 4-23-2017.docx 4/23/2019 To: Tacoma City Council Re: Tideflat Interim Regulations (Ordinance No. 28542) Dear Members of the Tacoma City Council, Please find attached my original written email comment from the 9/13/2017 meeting, requesting a response regarding the exclusion of my residence at 5324 12th Street NE and its 8.33 acres from your Item #3 Marine View Drive Residential Restrictions prohibiting residential development and mining moratorium. I am submitting this 3rd written comment to again request a response and determine your intentions to allow or disallow changes to your proposed blue cross hatched boundary area map. The value of this developable acreage, as well as my existing residence is a significant part of my “nest egg” for my future living expenses. I have been paying the property taxes on this acreage for over 60 years to the City of Tacoma while it has always been zoned for, and allowed to be used as, prime residential view property. I cannot afford to have this valuable asset reduced to an unsellable, useless property tax burden, because of the City of Tacoma’s expanding growth and port operations of which I have so faithfully supported for years. I have included a map of my parcel (0321361036) that is in question for your review which is at the southern end of your proposed map. Please let me know your intentions so I may make the appropriate preparations to protect my property. Sincerely, Barbara Ardelle Heiberg 5324 12th Street N.E. Tacoma, WA 98422 253-927-6146 Amended Ordinance 28470 Tideflat Interim Regulations->3rd response request Interim Tideflat Regulations 4-23-2017.docx From: Sorum, Doris Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 12:43 PM To: City Clerk's Office Subject: FW: Request for an Additional SEIS for the PSE LNG Facility Attachments: Tacoma City Council Request for Additional SEIS on LNG Project.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Anne Kroeker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 11:35 AM To: Woodards, Victoria <[email protected]>; Ibsen, Anders <[email protected]>; Thoms, Robert <[email protected]>; Blocker, Keith <[email protected]>; Ushka, Catherine <[email protected]>; Beale, Chris <[email protected]>; Hunter, Lillian <[email protected]>; McCarthy, Conor <[email protected]>; Mello, Ryan <[email protected]> Cc: Sorum, Doris <[email protected]>; City Manager <[email protected]>; Holderman, Celia <[email protected]>; Richard Leeds <[email protected]> Subject: Request for an Additional SEIS for the PSE LNG Facility Dear City of Tacoma Council and Staff, At your Council meeting on Tuesday evening this week, I, along with many others, spoke in support of asking the City to consider undertaking the process for an additional supplemental environmental impact statement, in the wake of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency’s release of their Final SEIS for the GHG analysis of the PSE LNG plant. As I did not have time to verbally present all of my statement, I am writing to you now, to include it and again ask for your consideration. <<...>> I, and my husband, understand that this request is not an easy one to grant nor do you probably feel that it is appropriate at this stage. According to the normally expected progression of EIS and permits, it is not. However, we believe that this particular process was never normalized nor is this project anything but extraordinary, in all of its applications, current and proposed. We understand that PSE believes they are solving a problem for future energy needs for their customers and supplying cleaner burning fuel for Tote Marine and other waterway hauling and that most of the rest of the world, our climate focused Governor included, believes that LNG is a necessary transition fuel. Of course not having diesel fumes is better for breathing. It’s just that the evidence points to this one benefit, which could be achieved by jumping ahead of the transition to electric generation, at least along the Sound out to the Ocean, is fraught with so many other killing side effects, from the additional carbon added to our overburdened atmosphere to the actual explosive nature of the LNG fuel itself. And being able to switch to true renewable energy sources, as from solar and wind generation, is doable now. The Tacoma Tideflats used to be an amazing estuary and still has some wonderful little spots left, which we have visited and supported with the Earthcorps restoration crews. Undoing all the environmental degradation that has been put into Commencement Bay to replace it with a healthy ecosystem, is not going to happen overnight but perhaps one effort at a time will make a difference. I know that every time we remove an invasive plant and replace it with a native wetland plant, we feel hope. So we realize that this is an uphill battle, on all fronts, and are asking you to lead the charge. A big ask and one that you may not feel you can do. We need to ask anyway and to ask if you could use your influence to persuade other State agencies, such as the Department of Ecology, to look into this project and see what they can do. We also ask that no matter what your choice, that you do meet with the Puyallup Tribe, to confer and consult with what has happened on this project and with what might happen in the future, and to promise them that going forward, Tacoma recognizes their authority on their traditional lands. The past is behind us. The future is everything. Thank you again for your time and attention to this very urgent matter, Anne Kroeker and Richard Leeds FW: Request for an Additional SEIS for the PSE LNG Facility->Tacoma City Council Request for Additional SEIS on LNG Project.docx Anne Kroeker and Richard Leeds, Des Moines, WA 4/9/2019 Support for Additional SEIS on PSE’s LNG Facility in Consultation with Puyallup Tribe To the Tacoma City Council and City staff, thank you for considering this request to require an additional SEIS for the PSE LNG plant in coordination with the Puyallup Tribe. Please allow me to explain why I, and my husband, care about this project not continuing. As residents who live along Poverty Bay in Des Moines, north of the proposed LNG Plant and along the path of ships which will be carrying this volatile (explosive) Liquefied Natural/Fracked Gas (LNG) fuel, we, and the communities up and down the waterways all the way to and from the Pacific Ocean, will have our lives put in jeopardy every time this fuel goes by. As community supporters who come to Tacoma for cultural events at the museums, musical and dramatic productions, we, along with City inhabitants, will be putting our lives and health in danger when we are in close proximity to the refinery toxins and operations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3
    2008 The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3 Grantees 13 Fiscal Sponsorships 28 Financial Highlights 30 Trustees and Staff 33 Committees 34 www.seattlefoundation.org | (206) 622-2294 While the 2008 financial crisis created greater needs in our community, it also gave us reason for hope. 2008 Foundation donors have risen to the challenges that face King County today by generously supporting the organizations effectively working to improve the well-being of our community. The Seattle Foundation’s commitment to building a healthy community for all King County residents remains as strong as ever. In 2008, with our donors, we granted more than $63 million to over 2000 organizations and promising initiatives in King County and beyond. Though our assets declined like most investments nationwide, The Seattle Foundation’s portfolio performed well when benchmarked against comparable endowments. In the longer term, The Seattle Foundation has outperformed portfolios comprised of traditional stocks and bonds due to prudent and responsible stewardship of charitable funds that has been the basis of our investment strategy for decades. The Seattle Foundation is also leading efforts to respond to increasing need in our community. Late last year The Seattle Foundation joined forces with the United Way of King County and other local funders to create the Building Resilience Fund—a three-year, $6 million effort to help local people who have been hardest hit by the economic downturn. Through this fund, we are bolstering the capacity of selected nonprofits to meet increasing basic needs and providing a network of services to put people on the road on self-reliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation As a National Heritage Area
    Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation as a National Heritage Area WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation as a National Heritage Area WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION APRIL 2010 The National Maritime Heritage Area feasibility study was guided by the work of a steering committee assembled by the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Steering committee members included: • Dick Thompson (Chair), Principal, Thompson Consulting • Allyson Brooks, Ph.D., Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation • Chris Endresen, Office of Maria Cantwell • Leonard Forsman, Chair, Suquamish Tribe • Chuck Fowler, President, Pacific Northwest Maritime Heritage Council • Senator Karen Fraser, Thurston County • Patricia Lantz, Member, Washington State Heritage Center Trust Board of Trustees • Flo Lentz, King County 4Culture • Jennifer Meisner, Washington Trust for Historic Preservation • Lita Dawn Stanton, Gig Harbor Historic Preservation Coordinator Prepared for the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation by Parametrix Berk & Associates March , 2010 Washington State NATIONAL MARITIME HERITAGE AREA Feasibility Study Preface National Heritage Areas are special places recognized by Congress as having nationally important heritage resources. The request to designate an area as a National Heritage Area is locally initiated,
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019
    October 2019 Community Attributes Inc. tells data-rich stories about communities that are important to decision makers. President and CEO: Chris Mefford Project Manager: Michaela Jellicoe Analysts: Madalina Calen Spencer Cohen, PhD Diana Haring Maureen McLennon Carrie Schaden Zack Tarhouni Community Attributes Inc. 500 Union Street, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98101 www.communityattributes.com October 2019 E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The Ports of Seattle and Tacoma combined represent a core economic development asset for businesses and communities in Washington state and elsewhere in the U.S. Both ports facilitate the movement of millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) of containerized cargo as well as millions of metric tons of breakbulk, automobiles, logs, and liquid bulk. Both ports are also host to industrial and non-industrial activities that spur job growth and economic wealth creation in the Central Puget Sound and Washington state. The Port of Seattle facilities support a large and growing cruise ship industry and serve approximately half of the North Pacific Fisheries Fleet. Exhibit E1. Estimated Direct Impacts of Activities at The Northwest Seaport Alliance, Port of Seattle, and Port of Tacoma, Washington, 2017 and 2019 Business Labor Income Jobs Output (mils) (mils) The Northwest Seaport Alliance (2017) 20,100 $5,858.7 $1,902.7 Containerized Cargo 14,900 $4,537.6 $1,502.5 Automobiles 1,300 $308.8 $108.4 Breakbulk, Logs and Other Cargo 3,900 $1,012.2 $291.9 Port of Seattle Cruise Industry (2019, 2018$) 3,000 $467.8 $122.7 Port of Seattle Commercial Fishing (2017) 7,200 $671.3 $313.4 Port of Seattle Recreational Marinas and Other Business (2017) 3,600 $728.8 $357.2 Port of Tacoma Tenants and Other Business (2017) 1,500 $852.2 $114.3 Sources: Puget Sound Regional Council, 2019; Washington State Employment Security Department, 2018; Washington State Department of Revenue, 2018; The Northwest Seaport Alliance, 2018; Port of Seattle, 2018; Port of Tacoma, 2018; Community Attributes Inc., 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Northwest Seaport Alliance Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Plan
    DRAFT Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Plan Produced by the Northwest Seaport Alliance June 30, 2021 Executive Summary: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER i Table of Contents: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER ii Glossary: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER iii 1. Purpose The Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA) is committed to reducing, and ultimately eliminating, the air and climate pollution emissions of diesel particulate matter (DPM) and greenhouse gases (GHG) – that are associated with the cargo shipping operations that we manage on behalf of the ports of Tacoma and Seattle. That is why The NWSA, at its inception in 2015, joined the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy (NWPCAS). The NWPCAS is a voluntary collaboration between the four largest port entities of the Pacific Northwest – NWSA, Port of Tacoma (PoT), Port of Seattle (PoS), and Port of Vancouver (VFPA) – to reduce air and climate pollution from their respective seaport activities throughout the Puget Sound – Georgia Basin Airshed. The NWPCAS constitutes a shared strategic framework for clean air and climate actions and investments that creates a “level playing field” across the four participating port entities, and helps them coordinate, collaborate, and hold each other accountable. The participating ports updated and renewed the NWPCAS in 2020, strengthening their commitment to reducing air and climate pollution. The 2020 NWPCAS puts forth an ambitious, aspirational, joint vision to phase out emissions from seaport activities by 2050, and a suite of high-level joint objectives and actions to advance that vision. In addition, each of the four participating port entities committed to developing a detailed implementation plan tailored to their particular policy environments, governance structures, lines of business, emissions profiles, and community priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion 09611
    -., .. ~ ~ ~.! .. ~ ~~, '" • ~ 1 L:\RRY PHllUP$ , KENT PULLE.N LOUISE MILLI:Fi 1 June 2.1995 INTRODUCED BY: BRUCE LAING 2 II CRD/lLK PROPOSED NO: 95 - 44 1 3 4 MOTION NO. 9 611 .:J 5 A MOTION approving projects for the King County Cultural Facilities Program, 6 in accordance with Ordinance 10189. 7 WHEREAS, the King County arts commission and landmarks and heritage commission 8 are authorized by Ordinance 10189 to administer cultural facilities projects, and 9 WHEREAS, the King County cultural resources division received 87 applications 10 requesting $8,639,677 fromthe 1995 Cultural Facilities Program and County.Council's Arts 11 and Natuml Resources Initiative. and 12 WHEREAS, two review panels of arts and heritage professionals, coro.munity 13 representatives, and commission representatives reviewed the applications and made 14 recommendations to the King County arts commission and landmarks and heritage 15 commission, as listed in Attachments A (arts) and B (heritage), and 16 WHEREAS, the Kin~ County arts commission and the King County landmarks and 17 heritage commission approved the review panels' recommendations, and 18 WHEREAS, the recommendations for arts and heritage Cultural Facilities Program 19 funding adhere to the guidelines and fmancial plan policies approved by the King County 20 council in Motion 8797, and 21 WHEREAS, the fmancial plan inc1u~ed as Attachment C, has been revised to indicate 22 actual hoteVmotel tax revenue. for 1994 and projected revenue consistent with assumptions 23 made in the 1995 adopted budget, and 24 WHEREAS, the financial, plan supports Cultural Facilities program funding; 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 , ' ( -~ f" ," '\ , 9611 ~ I " NOW THEREFORE BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: 2 The executive is hereby authorized to allocate a total of $727,399, which includes 3 $512,200 for twenty arts projects as listed in Attachment A for Cultural Facilities program arts ~ projects and $215,199 for eight heritage projects as listed in Attachment B for Cultural .S Facilities program heritage projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Lightship No. 83 (Lv 83 Wal 508)
    LIGHTSHIP NO. 83 HAER No. WA-175 (LV 83 WAL 508) Lightship BLUNTS Lightship SAN FRANCISCO Lightship RELIEF SWIFTS URE) South Lake Union Pier Seattle King County Washington PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C St. NW Washington, DC 20240 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD LIGHTSHIP No. 83 (LV 83) c,vAL sos) (Lightship BLUNTS) (Lightship SAN FRANCISCO) (Lightship RELIEF) (SWIFTS URE) HAER No. WA-175 LOCATION: South Lake Union Pier, Seattle, King County, Washington RIG/TYPE OF CRAFT: Lightship OFFICIAL NUMBERS: LV 83, WAL 508 PRINCIPAL DIMENSIONS: Length: 129' (112' as built in 1904) Beam: 28'-6" Depth: 12'-6" DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1904 DESIGNER: United States Office of the Light-House Board, C.J. Hutchins, Capt. U.S.N. Naval Secretary BUILDER: New York Shipbuilding Company, Camden. New Jersey SIGNIFICANCE: Lightship No. 83 is one of three surviving lightships and "the oldest on the West Coast." Of the three surviving lightships. "only No. 83 has retained her original marine steam engine and machinery, and hence is not only one of the oldest surviving American lightships, but also the lightship with the greatest integrity of design and form." 1 PROJECT INFORMATION: The Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) is a part of the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering 1 Information from U.S. Coast Guard, http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-cp/history/weblightships/lv83.html, accessed March 2005. Quote from James Delgado, "Lightship No. 83," National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, Maritime Heritage of the United States NHL Study-Large Vessels, July J 988, statement of significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Charting Washington State's Economy
    CHARTING WASHINGTON STATE’S ECONOMY: WHY FREIGHT MATTERS A Freight Primer by the Washington Public Ports Association and the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Dear Friends of a strong Why does trade matter to the PORTS CREATE JOBS and healthy state economy, state of Washington, its citizens, and businesses? PORT DISTRICTS The state of Washington stands astride an international trade route that links our state to 75 IN WASHINGTON STATE the world’s economy. Imports and exports through our ports sustain thousands of The state of Washington exported $79.6 billion in Washington businesses. Imports not only bring consumer goods and raw materials into goods in 2016. Goods exports accounted for DIRECT our state, they also increase opportunities for Washington producers to export their 19.2% of Washington's state Gross Domestic JOBS Product (GDP) in 2014, according to the United 71,300 products at lower costs by providing container capacity. Staying competitive in global markets supports jobs and helps families stretch paychecks further. States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration. With more than 95% of MARITIME Much of the cargo received at Washington's ports is discretionary and can move through the world’s population and 80% of the world’s 25,300 ACTIVITIES JOBS alternative gateways. In order to preserve the shipping options available to local purchasing power outside of the United States, producers, we must compete aggressively to preserve and expand access to trade routes. future American economic growth and job creation depends on open markets abroad. BILLION IN The Washington Public Ports Association (WPPA) has been forecasting waterborne cargo $4.6 ECONOMIC IMPACT through the state’s port system since 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Port of Tacoma Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Plan
    DRAFT Port of Tacoma Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Plan Produced by The Port of Tacoma July 8, 2021 1 Executive Summary: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER 2 Table of Contents: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER 3 Glossary: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER 4 1. Purpose Improving air quality and reducing impacts on climate change are key priorities for the Port of Tacoma (PoT) and as such, it has been a partner in the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy (NWPCAS) since its inception in 2008. The NWPCAS is a voluntary collaboration between the PoT, Port of Seattle (PoS), The Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA) and Port of Vancouver (VFPA) to reduce and ultimately eliminate air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from seaport activities in the Puget Sound-Georgia Basin Airshed. The NWPCAS constitutes a shared strategic framework for clean air and climate actions and investments that creates a “level playing field” across the four participating port entities, and helps them coordinate, collaborate, and hold each other accountable. The participating ports completed a renewal of the NWPCAS in 2020, continuing their commitment to work jointly to reduce air pollution and climate impacts. The 2020 NWPCAS puts forth an aggressive, aspirational joint vision to phase out emissions from seaport activities by 2050, supported by a suite of high-level joint objectives and actions. Given that each port exists in a unique policy environment, has different lines of business, and different community interests, there is a need for flexibility in how the ports individually implement the NWPCAS. Therefore, each port has committed to developing an Implementation Plan that details the individual actions they will take to work towards the NWPCAS vision and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 * Vol
    SKEETER NEWS A newsletter from The Steamer VIRGINIA V Foundation SUMMER 2019 * VOL. 97, NO. 2 From left to right: 2018 intern Kat in the forward hold; 2017 intern Jack at the engine throttle; and the 2017 internship cohort enjoying the view from the boatdeck. Interns Ahoy! By Margaret Saunders, Programs Manager Please help us welcome our 2019 C. Keith Birkenfeld Another facet of this internship we have sought to summer interns! You may run into these students aboard expand in 2019 is building career skills. This year, our the ship in July and August, as they learn alongside our interns will be attending the week-long Experience crew to work as deckhands and engineers operating and Maritime workshops at Seattle Maritime Academy to maintaining the SS VIRGINIA V. learn more about ocean literacy, shipboard operations, marine safety, survival at sea, marine mechanics, and This is our sixth year hosting the high school internship more. They will be able to network with industry peers program, and we are proud to share with you how the at Youth Maritime Collaborative’s South Lake Union program has grown and changed since its inception. intern fair with MOHAI, the Center for Wooden Boats, We received eighteen applications this year—a new and Northwest Seaport. The Foundation will also host record!—from students all across the Seattle area. By our own career training seminar to help these students expanding our network and outreach, we were able to fill build soft skills like resume writing, networking, and the six internship spots with enthusiastic and deserving interviewing.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME INDUSTRY PRESENT MARITIME 101 a Celebration of a Five Star Working Waterfront
    NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION AND THE SEATTLE MARITIME INDUSTRY PRESENT MARITIME 101 A Celebration of a Five Star Working Waterfront Photos courtesy of Don Wilson, Port of Seattle. Seattle Maritime 101: A Celebration of a Five Star Working Waterfront This Newspapers In Education (NIE) section provides an inside look at the The maritime industry has never been stronger—or more important to our region. maritime industry. From fishing and shipping to the cruise and passenger boat Annually, the industry contributes $30 billion to the state economy, according to a industries, Seattle has always been a maritime community. 2013 study by the Workforce Development Council of Seattle and King County. Our maritime industry is rooted in our rich history of timber production, our The Washington maritime industry is an engine of economic prosperity and location as a trade hub and our proximity to some of the world’s most growth. In 2012, the industry directly employed 57,700 workers across five major productive fisheries. The industry consists of the following sectors: subsectors, paying out wages of $4.1 billion. Maritime firms directly generated over $15.2 billion in revenue. Indirect and induced maritime positions accounted • Maritime Logistics and Shipping for another 90,000 jobs. It adds up to 148,000 jobs in Washington. That’s a lot! • Ship and Boat Building Washington is the most trade-dependent state in the country. According to the • Maintenance and Repair Port of Seattle, four in 10 jobs in Washington are tied to international trade. • Passenger Water Transportation (including Cruise Ships) Our maritime industry relies on a robust and concentrated support system to • Fishing and Seafood Processing fuel its growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northwest Seaport Alliance Memorandum
    THE NORTHWEST SEAPORT ALLIANCE MEMORANDUM MANAGING MEMBERS Item No. 8A STAFF BRIEFING Date of Meeting August 4, 2020 DATE: July 22, 2020 TO: Managing Members FROM: John Wolfe, CEO Sponsors: Sandy Kilroy, Director, Maritime Environment & Sustainability, Port of Seattle, and Jason Jordan, Director, Environmental and Planning Services Project Manager: Jon Sloan, Sr. Manager, Environmental Programs, Port of Seattle SUBJECT: “Quiet Sound” Underwater Noise Reduction Program Recommendations (State Orca Task Force Recommendation #22) A. BRIEFING REQUESTED Staff will brief the Managing Members on the recommendations of the Planning Team to establish a program for reducing underwater noise from large commercial vessels. No action is being requested. B. BACKGROUND GOVERNOR’S ORCA TASK FORCE Governor Inslee’s Southern Resident Orca Task Force issued its Task Force Report and Recommendations on November 16, 2018. It consisted of 36 recommendations to collectively achieve the vision of a thriving and resilient Southern Resident orca population. The recommendations emphasize four goals: Increase Chinook salmon abundance Decrease disturbance and risk to Southern Resident orcas from vessels and noise Reduce the exposure of Southern Resident orcas and their prey to contaminants Ensure that funding, information and accountability mechanisms are in place to support effective implementation Task Force Recommendation #22 is to “Implement shipping noise-reduction initiatives and monitoring programs, coordinating with Canadian and U.S. authorities”. This includes the following objective related to noise reduction: The Northwest Seaport Alliance “Quiet Sound” Underwater Noise Reduction Program Recommendations Meeting of August 4, 2020 Page 2 of 5 Create a program similar to Port of Vancouver’s Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation program (ECHO) for Washington State, including participation by ports, whale watching operators, private vessel operators and tribal governments as desired.
    [Show full text]
  • SIA 2011 Conference Seattle, WA Paper Session Abstracts and Bios
    Society for Industrial Archeology Saturday, June 4, 2011 40th Annual Conference Paper Sessions Grand Hyatt, Seattle, WA Time Track 1: Industrial Facilities and Landscapes Track 2: Documentation and Preservation Track 3: 22nd Annual Historic Bridge Symposium 8:00- 1A: Industry of the Pacific Northwest 2A: Maritime Archaeology in the Pacific Northwest 3A: 22nd Annual Historic Bridge Symposium, Part I 9:30 Moderator: Feliks Banel Moderator: Todd Croteau Moderators: Kitty Henderson and Eric DeLony 1. Lloyd B. Tepper and Jeffrey H. Tepper, “The Rise and 1. Todd Croteau, Welcome and Introduction 1. Kitty Henderson and Eric DeLony, Welcome and Fall of the Tacoma Arsenic Industry” 2. Shelly Leavens, “Gig Harbor Net Sheds” Introduction 2. Rick Minor and Susanna Kuo, “The Oswego Iron 3. Shannon Fitzgerald and Diana Hennick, “Historic 2. Rex W. Meyer, “History of the Lacey V. Murrow Works: An 1866 Charcoal Iron Furnace near Portland, Ships at the Northwest Seaport” Bridge: The World’s First Concrete Floating Bridge” Oregon” 4. Emmett Smith and Sam Johnson, “The Pacific 3. Michael Roberts, “Blue Bridge Blues in British 3. Anthony Meadow, “Steel in the Northwest” Northwest Boat Documentation Project” Columbia’s Capital City” 4. Sandy Carter, “Stories from the Mill at the Falls – Insiders’ Memories of the Evolution of Mill Work at Crown Zellerbach International” 9:45- 1B: Water and Power 2B: Recording Our Industrial Heritage: Challenges and 3B: 22nd Annual Historic Bridge Symposium, Part II 11:30 Moderator: Carol Litchfield Techniques Moderators: Kitty Henderson and Eric DeLony 1. Duncan Hay, “Get Pumped! Revitalization of Boston’s Moderator to be confirmed 1.
    [Show full text]