DOCSLIB.ORG

The Power of Targeted Prayer How Are You Doing?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Power of Targeted Prayer How Are You Doing? FRONTLINES A Window into America’s Universities APRIL 2020 Faculty Commons® A CRU MINISTRY §1 – How are you doing? The Power of A Tentmaking Not Falling Targeted Prayer Professor Through Cracks Eliciting hope and bringing comfort in the How God specifically set the stage to develop Cal Poly professor helps others live out their We want every grad student to have the ravages of a pandemic. §1 a thriving faculty ministry at NC State. §2 faith in academia and business. §3 opportunity to know Jesus. §4 How are you doing? Rick Hove, Faculty Commons® National Director to each other, “Aren’t we glad to be home!” As I On March 5 write this, our Israel/Italy trip is so far from my Sonya and I mind. A dear friend with Cru struggles to live. My Duke doctor/professor friend suits up in planned to hazmat gear to care for those with the disease. COVID-19 has rocked our world, leaving our leave with mouths agape, wondering in disbelief how this could be, and speculating what will be. So, like three other a daffodil emerging in spring after a deep freeze, anything emerging these days as couples for an extended “certain,” “reliable,” or “comforting” becomes trip to Israel, which would cherished indeed. One thing that has emerged as certain, re- culminate with a visit to our Faculty Com- liable, and comforting is that we need each mons work in Italy. One of our traveling other. From the moment normal life began friends is an infectious disease doctor/profes- to unravel, I sensed the Lord encouraging me Reimagining Ministry sor at Duke, who obviously kept a watchful eye to ask folks, “How are you doing? How is this Faculty Commons has been reimagining what ministry looks like given social distancing on this new virus across the globe. hitting you? Can I do anything?” Others have and quarantine. God had already equipped us for this unique period in history with im- Just three days prior to our departure, on asked me this, too. And boy, I have needed it. portant online video conferencing technologies such as Zoom and Google Hangouts. These March 2, upon his advice (and the advice of As our staff began to ask professors these have now become indispensable tools in making ministry connections. Although most of his mentor), we sadly canceled the trip. At the questions, pages and pages of email responses the articles in this issue highlight approaches God was using before this pandemic, He is time, not one of us feared the disease. What poured in. You would not believe the stories. now giving us new ways to let the light of Jesus Christ shine in a dark and needy world. terrified us, however, was being overseas in Faculty have cried on the phone. One Faculty quarantine, unable to return. Or, in quarantine Commons staff couple told me they had to fessors, universities, and the world. The way We are so grateful for you, and we’d love to once we returned. limit each day how many people they emailed we start this is important: love those around know. Feel free to contact me at rick.hove@ In hindsight, we were so wrong about the with these questions. The responses were just us. Take time to ask, “How are you doing?” cru.org or any Faculty Commons/Cru staff. disease and so providentially right about the so sincere and overwhelming that they did not Care. Jesus modeled this. Every human yearns God’s blessing upon you in this time of great reality of getting stuck overseas (we would have time to reply in earnest to each response. for this, and is, in fact, made for this. loss and need. have) and our decision to cancel. The profound power of asking: How are you The simple question, “How are you doing?” National Director of Faculty Commons® Rick That week, the pre-tremors of COVID-19 doing? Simple. Life-giving. Hope-producing. is powerful enough to elicit hope and bring Hove and his wife, Sonya, live in Durham, NC, leveled much of life as we knew it, pummeling Faculty Commons’ mission is to build move- comfort in the ravages of a pandemic. That is and have three adult children. us with one devastating, inconceivable blow ments of Christ-following professors who take amazing. after another. More than once we commented the hope of Jesus Christ to our students, pro- How are you doing? §2 The Power of Targeted Prayer Ministry Profile: Mike & Sharon Mehaffie, Faculty Commons Representatives, NC State Univ. When was the last God set the stage leading the Mehaffies to time you experienced pray and led these faculty members to restart God answer prayer in a faculty fellowship. Soon a core group of an unexpected and five professors met regularly for prayer and surprising manner? planning faculty events. They started small- Mike and Sharon group Bible studies and A Grander Story book Mehaffie, Cru cam- studies for colleagues. To make their presence pus staff at North known on campus they distributed gift bags to Carolina State University since 1981, were new faculty. Now 140 professors sign their Faculty Appreciation Dinners provide a win/win for students and faculty. Students are able to say “thank stunned at how God answered their prayer names to half or full-page faculty ads in you” in a meaningful way, and professors feel appreciated and honored. of faith. the student newspaper identifying themselves for their impact, it is a refreshing change. by a student who survived my tough course. It Early in 2018 the NC State campus staff team as Christians. Mike Mehaffie explains: “These dinners was lovely to spend the evening with her. The met in a planning session. Brainstorming areas Each year the faculty group and the Cru bring non-Christian faculty to hear a thought- speaker was inspiring.” And this year, seven of ministry, they made a list of 30 places student ministry organize a Faculty Apprecia- ful gospel message, and professors are truly professors wanted to know more about being “where we are not.” Each person put their tion Dinner. Christian students each invite affected by the encouraging words of their involved in faculty ministry. name next to one area to pray. Mike Mehaffie a former professor to honor at the dinner. students. We’ve seen faculty beaming and even It’s exciting to watch a faculty ministry chose “faculty ministry.” There had been an In the academic world, faculty are constantly some tears of happiness.” begin anew and then grow because of the effort to develop a faculty ministry years critiqued. When students invite faculty to This February one professor wrote: “It was targeted prayer of Faculty Commons staff and earlier, but it now needed to be restarted. attend a dinner to hear words of appreciation an absolute honor to be invited to this dinner professors. The Mehaffies prayed that God would pro- vide professors to establish a faculty ministry. Within one month they received two unso- North Carolina State University licited emails. Retired Professor Gerald Van NC State, located in Raleigh, NC, first held classes in 1889 and is now the state’s Dyke asked, “Can we restart the faculty minis- largest university. A powerhouse in science, technology, engineering and math, try at NC State?” Then Dr. Steven Hall, a NC State is a national leader in efforts to curb nuclear proliferation, develop a smart electric grid, create self-powered health monitors, help farmers confront professor who had recently moved from LSU climate changes, and build a new American manufacturing sector. to NC State, sent this question: “I was involved with Faculty Commons at LSU. Is there any- • Total 2019 enrollment 36,304. • #3 among national research universities in producing Fulbright Scholars. thing like that here?” • #3 nuclear engineering program, #8 biological and agricultural engineering The year before this happened, God was (U.S. News & World Report). already at work in the lives of faculty mem- • #4 veterinary medicine program nationally (U.S. News & World Report). bers. Dr. Laura Sremaniak and Dr. Ed • #4 graphic design program in the country and best among public universities Gehringer attended Faculty Commons’ 2017 A (Animation Career Review). Common Call conference for Christian profes- • #6 nationally in online graduate computer and information technology sors in Greenville, South Carolina. Afterward, programs (U.S. News & World Report). • One of just two NCAA schools in 2019 to have a first-round draft pick in the Dr. Gehringer emailed Dr. Sremaniak, “We WNBA, MLB, and NFL drafts. James B. Hunt Jr. Library (Centennial Campus) features an iconic modern exterior and an need to get something going with faculty at • Go Wolfpack! interior filled with cutting-edge technological integration. NC State!” §3 A Tentmaking Professor Faculty Profile: Dr. David Janzen, Professor of Computer Science, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA Dr. Janzen was awarded the 2019 Nilson seeking to build a network of Christian profes- Award, given by Faculty Commons to an out- sors at Cal Poly who would work together with standing professor in the U.S. to recognize men the 800-strong Cru student movement there to and women God is raising up to forward His impact their campus for Christ. cause in the university. This provided a perfect opportunity for Dr. When Dr. David Janzen left a lucrative career Janzen to multiply his efforts by now having in the software industry to become a professor, a Christian influence with other professors as he was following a leading from God. “I feel well as students. He leads Christian colleagues called to be in a public space as a tentmaker,” in small discipleship groups to pray, study, he explains, “sharing the gospel, making dis- and join one another in missional activities Cal Poly professor David Janzen and wife, Karen, interacting with students on a recent international ciples, and being a light in a dark place.” on campus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY MOOD How Does Your City Feel?
    CITY MOOD how does your city feel? Luisa Fabrizi Interaction Design One year Master 15 Credits Master Thesis August 2014 Supervisor: Jörn Messeter CITY MOOD how does your city feel? 2 Thesis Project I Interaction Design Master 2014 Malmö University Luisa Fabrizi [email protected] 3 01. INDEX 01. INDEX .................................................................................................................................03 02. ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................04 03. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................05 04. METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................................08 05. THEORETICAL FRamEWORK ...........................................................................................................09 06. DESIGN PROCESS ...................................................................................................................18 07. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ..............................................................................................................41 08. FURTHER IMPLEMENTATIONS ....................................................................................................44 09. APPENDIX ..............................................................................................................................47 02.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing God? Towards Machines That Deny Their Maker
    Lecture with Prof. Rosalind Picard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Playing God? Towards Machines that Deny Their Maker 22. April 2016 14:15 UniS, Hörsaal A003 CAMPUS live VBG Bern Institut für Philosophie Christlicher Studentenverein Christliche Hochschulgruppe Länggassstrasse 49a www.campuslive.ch/bern www.bern.vbg.net 3000 Bern 9 www.philosophie.unibe.ch 22. April 2016 14:15 UniS, Hörsaal A003 (Schanzeneckstrasse 1, Bern) Lecture with Prof. Rosalind Picard (MIT) Playing God? Towards Machines that Deny their Maker "Today, technology is acquiring the capability to sense and respond skilfully to human emotion, and in some cases to act as if it has emotional processes that make it more intelligent. I'll give examples of the potential for good with this technology in helping people with autism, epilepsy, and mental health challenges such as anxie- ty and depression. However, the possibilities are much larger: A few scientists want to build computers that are vastly superior to humans, capable of powers beyond reproducing their own kind. What do we want to see built? And, how might we make sure that new affective technologies make human lives better?" Professor Rosalind W. Picard, Sc.D., is founder and director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab where she also chairs MIT's Mind+Hand+Heart initiative. Picard has co- founded two businesses, Empatica, Inc. creating wearable sensors and analytics to improve health, and Affectiva, Inc. delivering software to measure and communi- cate emotion through facial expression analysis. She has authored or co-authored over 200 scientific articles, together with the book Affective Computing, which was instrumental in giving rise to the field by that name.
    [Show full text]
  • Membership Information
    ACM 1515 Broadway New York, NY 10036-5701 USA The CHI 2002 Conference is sponsored by ACM’s Special Int e r est Group on Computer-Human Int e r a c t i o n (A CM SIGCHI). ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is a major force in advancing the skills and knowledge of Information Technology (IT) profession- als and students throughout the world. ACM serves as an umbrella organization offering its 78,000 members a variety of forums in order to fulfill its members’ needs, the delivery of cutting-edge technical informa- tion, the transfer of ideas from theory to practice, and opportunities for information exchange. Providing high quality products and services, world-class journals and magazines; dynamic special interest groups; numerous “main event” conferences; tutorials; workshops; local special interest groups and chapters; and electronic forums, ACM is the resource for lifelong learning in the rapidly changing IT field. The scope of SIGCHI consists of the study of the human-computer interaction process and includes research, design, development, and evaluation efforts for interactive computer systems. The focus of SIGCHI is on how people communicate and interact with a broadly-defined range of computer systems. SIGCHI serves as a forum for the exchange of ideas among com- puter scientists, human factors scientists, psychologists, social scientists, system designers, and end users. Over 4,500 professionals work together toward common goals and objectives. Membership Information Sponsored by ACM’s Special Interest Group on Computer-Human
    [Show full text]
  • Download a PDF of This Issue
    Hal Abelson • Edward Adams • Morris Adelman • Edward Adelson • Khurram Afridi • Anuradha Agarwal • Alfredo Alexander-Katz • Marilyne Andersen • Polina Olegovna Anikeeva • Anuradha M Annaswamy • Timothy Antaya • George E. Apostolakis • Robert C. Armstrong • Elaine V. Backman • Lawrence Bacow • Emilio Baglietto • Hari Balakrishnan • Marc Baldo • Ronald G. Ballinger • George Barbastathis • William A. Barletta • Steven R. H. Barrett • Paul I. Barton • Moungi G. Bawendi • Martin Z. Bazant • Geoffrey S. Beach • Janos M. Beer • Angela M. Belcher • Moshe Ben-Akiva • Hansjoerg Berger • Karl K. Berggren • A. Nihat Berker • Dimitri P. Bertsekas • Edmundo D. Blankschtein • Duane S. Boning • Mary C. Boyce • Kirkor Bozdogan • Richard D. Braatz • Rafael Luis Bras • John G. Brisson • Leslie Bromberg • Elizabeth Bruce • Joan E. Bubluski • Markus J. Buehler • Cullen R. Buie • Vladimir Bulovic • Mayank Bulsara • Tonio Buonassisi • Jacopo Buongiorno • Oral Buyukozturk • Jianshu Cao • Christopher Caplice • JoAnn Carmin • John S. Carroll • W. Craig Carter • Frederic Casalegno • Gerbrand Ceder • Ivan Celanovic • Sylvia T. Ceyer • Ismail Chabini • Anantha • P. Chandrakasan • Gang Chen • Sow-Hsin Chen • Wai K. Cheng • Yet-Ming Chiang • Sallie W. Chisholm • Nazil Choucri • Chryssosto- midis Chryssostomos • Shaoyan Chu • Jung-Hoon Chun • Joel P. Clark • Robert E. Cohen • Daniel R. Cohn • Clark K. Colton • Patricia Connell • Stephen R. Connors • Chathan Cooke • Charles L. Cooney • Edward F. Crawley • Mary Cummings • Christopher C. Cummins • Kenneth R. Czerwinski • Munther A. Da hleh • Rick Lane Danheiser • Ming Dao • Richard de Neufville • Olivier L de Weck • Edward Francis DeLong • Erik Demaine • Martin Demaine • Laurent Demanet • Michael J. Demkowicz • John M. Deutch • Srini Devadas • Mircea Dinca • Patrick S Doyle • Elisabeth M.Drake • Mark Drela • Catherine L.Drennan • Michael J.Driscoll • Steven Dubowsky • Esther Duflo • Fredo Durand • Thomas Eagar • Richard S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wearable Platform to Foster Learning of Natural Facial Expressions and Emotions in High-Functioning Autism and Asperger Syndrome
    Wearable Platform to Foster Learning of Natural Facial Expressions and Emotions in High-Functioning Autism and Asperger Syndrome PRIMARY INVESTIGATORS: Matthew Goodwin, The Groden Center. Rosalind Picard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory Rana el Kaliouby, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory Alea Teeters, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory June Groden, The Groden Center DESCRIPTION: Evaluate the scientific and clinical significance of using a wearable camera system (Self-Cam) to improve recognition of emotions from real-world faces in young adults with Asperger syndrome (AS) and high-functioning autism (HFA). The study tests a group of 10 young adults diagnosed with AS/HFA who are asked to wear Self-Cam three times a week for 10 weeks, and use a computerized, interactive facial expression analysis system to review and analyze their videos on a weekly basis. A second group of 10 age-, sex-, IQ-matched young adults with AS/HFA will use Mind Reading – a systematic DVD guide for teaching emotion recognition. These two groups will be tested pre- and post-intervention on recognition of emotion from faces at three levels of generalization: videos of themselves, videos of their interaction partner, and videos of other participants (i.e. people they are less familiar with). A control group of 10 age- and sex- matched typically developing adults will also be tested to establish performance differences in emotion recognition abilities across groups. This study will use a combination of behavioral reports, direct observation, and pre- and post- questionnaires to assess Self-Cam’s acceptance by persons with autism. We hypothesize that the typically developing control group will perform better on emotion recognition than both groups with AS/HFA at baseline and that the Self-Cam group, whose intervention teaches emotion recognition using real-life videos, will perform better than the Mind Reading group who will learn emotion recognition from a standard stock of emotion videos.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Multimodal Affective Computing to Enhance the User Experience of Educational Software Applications
    Hindawi Mobile Information Systems Volume 2018, Article ID 8751426, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8751426 Research Article Multimodal Affective Computing to Enhance the User Experience of Educational Software Applications Jose Maria Garcia-Garcia ,1 Vı´ctor M. R. Penichet ,1 Marı´a Dolores Lozano ,1 Juan Enrique Garrido ,2 and Effie Lai-Chong Law3 1Research Institute of Informatics, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain 2Escuela Polite´cnica Superior, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain 3Department of Informatics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Mar´ıa Dolores Lozano; [email protected] Received 19 January 2018; Revised 8 July 2018; Accepted 5 August 2018; Published 13 September 2018 Academic Editor: Salvatore Carta Copyright © 2018 Jose Maria Garcia-Garcia et al. -is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Affective computing is becoming more and more important as it enables to extend the possibilities of computing technologies by incorporating emotions. In fact, the detection of users’ emotions has become one of the most important aspects regarding Affective Computing. In this paper, we present an educational software application that incorporates affective computing by detecting the users’ emotional states to adapt its behaviour to the emotions sensed. -is way, we aim at increasing users’ engagement to keep them motivated for longer periods of time, thus improving their learning progress. To prove this, the application has been assessed with real users. -e performance of a set of users using the proposed system has been compared with a control group that used the same system without implementing emotion detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Affect Control. Or
    Total Affect Control Or: Who’s Afraid of a Pleasing Little Sister? Marie-Luise Angerer and Bernd Bösel Abstract Through the emergence of affect- and psychotechnologies, especially with the advent of affective computing, the recognition, regulation and production of affects have been automatised to an unforesee- able degree. The roots of this algorithmic automation can be seen in the propagation of cybernetic models in the field of psychology from the 1950s onwards. A direct genealogical line leads from Silvan Tomkins’ affect system via Paul Ekman’s facial emotion recogni- tion to Rosalind Picard’s conception and co-development of affect- sensitive computer systems. Nevertheless, the implicated aspects of surveillance and collection of affective information have yet to be assessed critically. Such an assessment is outlined here. The Tip of the Iceberg of Digital Control: Affective Computing As discussed in many recent publications, the regulation of affects and emotions is dependent on historical, cultural, socio-political and not least media-tech- nological developments.1 How affects and emotions are coded and expressed, whether they are fostered and actively supported or whether they are ignored or even denied, depends on a wealth of factors that are dealt with individually by many scholars in the fields of history and cultural studies.2 Today, however, a fundamental shift is taking place in the conditions of media technology (a shift whose socio-political impact is still entirely unclear) as affectivity is technicised 1 See for example: Angerer/Bösel/Ott (2014); Goldberg (2012); Wetherell (2012); Dixon (2003). 2 We deliberately use both terms here to point out that in the discourses in question no distinction between affect and emotion is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratory Tool for Autism Spectrum Conditions
    MIT | Media Lab | Affective Computing Exploratory Tool for Autism Spectrum Conditions Rana el Kaliouby Alea Teeters Rosalind Picard http://www.media.mit.edu/affect BSN 2006 Workshop Autism Spectrum Conditions autism mind-reading machines demo challenges Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) – 1 child in 166 has ASC {kaliouby, teeters, picard}@media.mit.edu MIT | Media Lab | Affective Computing New Initiative: Autism Wearables autism mind-reading machines demo challenges Repetitive, obsessive behavior Related work • Monitoring • Assessment • Natural environment Communication Social interaction {kaliouby, teeters, picard}@media.mit.edu MIT | Media Lab | Affective Computing Examples of Autism Wearables autism mind-reading machines demo challenges Automated capture to support therapists Recognition of stimming behavior during intervention sessions (e.g. flapping, rocking) (Digital Pen, Voice Input and Video) Bluetooth accelerator and HMMs Kientz, Broing, Abowd, Hayes Westeyn, Vadas, Bian, Starner, (Ubicomp 2005) and Abowd (ISWC 2005) {kaliouby, teeters, picard}@media.mit.edu MIT | Media Lab | Affective Computing Autism Spectrum Conditions autism mind-reading machines demo challenges Repetitive, obsessive behavior Communication Social interaction Our research • Intervention • Assistive • Natural environment {kaliouby, teeters, picard}@media.mit.edu MIT | Media Lab | Affective Computing Mind-Read > Act > Persuade autism mind-reading machines demo challenges hmm … Roz looks busy. Its probably not a good time to bring this up Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Affectiva-MIT Facial Expression Dataset (AM-FED): Naturalistic and Spontaneous Facial Expressions Collected In-The-Wild
    Affectiva-MIT Facial Expression Dataset (AM-FED): Naturalistic and Spontaneous Facial Expressions Collected In-the-Wild The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation McDuff, Daniel Jonathan; el Kaliouby, Rana; Senechal, Thibaud; Amr, May; Cohn, Jeffrey F.; Picard, Rosalind W. " Affectiva-MIT Facial Expression Dataset (AM-FED): Naturalistic and Spontaneous Facial Expressions Collected In-the-Wild." Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2013. Publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/80733 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Affectiva-MIT Facial Expression Dataset (AM-FED): Naturalistic and Spontaneous Facial Expressions Collected In-the-Wild Daniel McDuffyz, Rana El Kalioubyyz, Thibaud Senechalz, May Amrz, Jeffrey F. Cohnx, Rosalind Picardyz z Affectiva Inc., Waltham, MA, USA y MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA x Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA [email protected], fkaliouby,thibaud.senechal,[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract ing research and media testing [14] to understanding non- verbal communication [19]. With the ubiquity of cameras Computer classification of facial expressions requires on computers and mobile devices, there is growing interest large amounts of data and this data needs to reflect the in bringing these applications to the real-world. To do so, diversity of conditions seen in real applications.
    [Show full text]
  • AI Ignition Ignite Your AI Curiosity with Roz Picard
    AI Ignition Ignite your AI curiosity with Roz Picard How can AI support wellbeing? From Deloitte’s AI institute, this is AI ignition, a monthly chat about the human side of artificial intelligence, with your host, Beena Amaranth. We’ll take a deep dive into the past, present, and future of AI, machine learning, neural networks, and other cutting-edge technologies. Here’s your host, Beena. Beena Amaranth: Hello, my name is Beena Amaranth, and I’m the executive director for Deloitte AI Institute. And today on AI ignition, we have Rosalind Picard, Roz, a professor, author, and inventor. Roz is the founder and director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the MIT Media Lab, as well as a co-founder of two companies: Affectiva Inc. and Empatica, Inc. Roz, welcome to the show. How have you been? Rosalind Picard (Roz): I’m doing well, Beena, thank you so much. How are you doing? Beena: I’m doing well, and I’m so glad I’m vaccinated, so I’m looking forward to getting out there and meeting people in real, so someday we might actually meet in person soon. I’m very excited about that. Roz, I really wanted to start our discussion with a field that you created—affective computing, the research group that you are the founder and director of, to advance human well-being via emotion AI. That’s a fascinating area. Can you share a little bit more about what is emotion AI and why is it important and what does affective computing mean? Roz Picard: Yes, thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Affective Computing
    The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems Affective Computing Affect is a core aspect of intelligence. Drives and emotions, such as excitement and depression, are used to coordinate action throughout intelligent life, even in species that lack a nervous system. Emotions are one mechanism that humans evolved to accomplish what needs to be done in the time available with the information at hand—to satisfice. Emotions are not an impediment to rationality; arguably they are integral to rationality in humans. Humans create and respond to both positive and negative emotional influence as they coordinate their actions with other individuals to create societies. Autonomous and intelligent systems (A/IS) are being designed to simulate emotions in their interactions with humans in ways that will alter our societies. A/IS should be used to help humanity to the greatest extent possible in as many contexts as are appropriate. While A/IS have tremendous potential to effect positive change, there is also potential that artifacts used in society could cause harm either by amplifying, altering, or even dampening human emotional experience. Even rudimentary versions of synthetic emotions, such as those already in use within nudging systems, have already altered the perception of A/IS by the general public and public policy makers. This chapter of Ethically Aligned Design addresses issues related to emotions and emotion- like control in interactions between humans and design of A/IS. We have put forward recommendations on a variety of topics: considering how affect varies across human cultures; the particular problems of artifacts designed for caring and private relationships; considerations of how intelligent artifacts may be used for “nudging”; how systems can support human flourishing; and appropriate policy interventions for artifacts designed with inbuilt affective systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Summary Exploring the Role of Emotion in Propelling the SMET
    Project Summary Exploring the Role of Emotion in Propelling the SMET Learning Process Rosalind Picard, Barry Kort, Rob Reilly Media Laboratory, M.I.T. {picard, bkort, reilly}@media.mit.edu The current educational system is constructed so as to emphasize the evolution of rule-based reasoners (students who understand the ‘what’ of a task/problem). However scientists, mathematicians, engineers, and technologists are not rule-based reasoners. They are model-based reasoners/thinkers (e.g., they do recursion, diagnostic reasoning, cognitive assessment, cognitive appraisal). To provide for the development of SMET (science, math, engineering, technology) learners, teachers and mentors who are reflective of the educational system’s pedagogy must not model directive teaching, which develops rule-based thinkers, but they should model how to learn. The educational pedagogy of a teacher and of the curriculum must include an understanding of learning intelligence-the ability to understand and model how-to-learn, how to solve a unique problem even when confronted with discouraging set- backs during its solution; in other words, they must be able to do model-based reasoning. Based upon this hypothesis, we propose to explore and evolve current educational pedagogy such that SMET learning will move toward a model-based reasoning pedagogy. There has been a good deal of researcher conducted in this field that is very important. Their focus, however, is largely on how mood influences the content of what is learned or retrieved, and very much in a rule-based learning context. Our focus, in contrast, is on constructing a theory of affect in SMET learning, together with building practical tools that can specifically aid the student learn how to learn.
    [Show full text]