DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts on Oak Ridge Landowners of Off-Site Releases to the Environment from the Y-12 Plant and Associated Long-Term Stewardship Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts on Oak Ridge Landowners of Off-Site Releases to the Environment from the Y-12 Plant and Associated Long-Term Stewardship Issues Impacts on Oak Ridge Landowners of Off-site Releases to the Environment from the Y-12 Plant and Associated Long-term Stewardship Issues BY INSTITUTE FORTECHNOLOGY, SOCIAL, AND POLICY AWARENESS, INC. IMPACTS ON OAK RIDGE LANDOWNERS OF OFF-SITE RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT FROM THE Y-12 PLANT AND ASSOCIATED LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP ISSUES PERFORMED FOR INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY, SOCIAL, AND POLICY AWARENESS, INC. PERFORMED BY KAPLINE ENTERPRISES, INC. SUSAN ARNOLD KAPLAN PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR MARCH 31, 2005 4121 Guinn Road Knoxville, TN 37931 Tel: (865) 927-3784 • Fax: (865) 927-1772 INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY, SOCIAL, AND POLICY AWARENESS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS i. TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................i ii. FOREWORD............................................................................................................... x iii. DEDICATION ...........................................................................................................xi iv. DISCLAIMER...........................................................................................................xii v. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................xiii vi. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................xix 1.0 SCOPE, PURPOSE, AND GOALS........................................................................... 1 1.1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND GOALS.............................................................................. 1 1.3 WHY THE STUDY WAS DONE................................................................. 2 1.3.1 CONFUSION IN THE COMMUNITY.......................................... 2 1.3.1.1 ABOUT THE CREEK...................................................... 2 1.3.1.2 ABOUT POTEN. HEALTH RISKS AND EFFECTS ..... 5 1.3.2 REVISITING THE 400 PPM MERCURY CLEANUP LEVEL ... 5 1.3.3 LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP.................................................... 9 1.3.4 BIG PICTURE PERSPECTIVE................................................... 11 2.0 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS....................................... 12 3.0 OVERVIEW OF ISSUES IMPACTING PROPERTY OWNERS ......................... 14 3.1 THE “RELEASE” PROBLEM..................................................................... 14 3.2 THE “IMAGE” PROBLEM ........................................................................ 16 3.3 THE RESULTING “REAL ESTATE” PROBLEM.................................... 17 3.4 REAL ESTATE DISCLOSURE.................................................................. 18 3.5 ECONOMIC AND OTHER IMPACTS...................................................... 19 3.5.1 ECONOMIC................................................................................. 19 3.5.2 PUBLIC HEALTH ....................................................................... 20 3.6 EFPC IN PERSPECTIVE WITH OTHER URBAN CREEKS................... 21 4.0 PUBLIC HEALTH AND RELATED ACTIVITIES .............................................. 22 4.1 TIMELINE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND RELATED ACTIVITIES ......... 23 4.2 ATSDR STATEMENT OF MERCURY ISSUES ....................................... 33 4.3 HEALTH HAZARDS OF Y-12 CONTAMINANTS .................................. 35 4.3.1 MERCURY................................................................................... 35 4.3.1.1 POSSIBLE FORMS IN THE ENVIRONMENT ........... 35 4.3.1.2 ANIMAL STUDY RESULTS........................................ 35 4.3.1.3 KNOWN HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS ..................... 36 © ITSPA Rev.1 - 3/23/05 i INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY, SOCIAL, AND POLICY AWARENESS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 4.3.1 MERCURY (CONT.) 4.3.1.4 HAZARDS OF FORMS FOUND IN THE EFPC FLOODPLAIN ............................................................... 37 4.3.1.4.1 1993 ATSDR HEALTH CONSULTATION..37 4.3.1.4.2 1995 ATSDR HEALTH CONSULTATION..38 4.3.1.5 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS ...........................................38 4.3.1.5.1 SOIL AND SEDIMENT................................. 39 4.3.1.5.2 FISH CONSUMPTION.................................. 39 4.3.1.5.3 FOOD CHAIN................................................ 40 4.3.1.6 EXPOSURE SCENARIOS AND EXPECTED RISK .. 40 4.3.1.6.1 PLAYING IN THE FLOODPLAIN............... 40 4.3.1.6.2 EATING FISH................................................ 41 4.3.1.6.3 INHALATION OF VAPOR FROM SOIL..... 42 4.3.1.7 DOSE CALCULATION EQUATIONS............. 42 4.3.2 URANIUM.................................................................................... 43 4.3.3 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)............................. 44 4.3.4 BERYLLIUM................................................................................ 45 4.4 SAMPLING BASIS (MERCURY/PCBs) ................................................... 46 4.4.1 1985 HOUSEHOLD SURVEY AND HUMAN SAMPLING..... 46 4.4.1.1 PHASE I..........................................................................47 4.4.1.2 PHASE II........................................................................ 47 4.4.2 1997 WATTS BAR RESERVOIR AND CLINCH RIVER TURTLE SAMPLING SURVEY................................................. 47 4.4.3 1997 WATTS BAR EXPOSURE INVESTIGATION................. 48 4.4.4 DOE-FUNDED MONITORING AND SAMPLING................... 49 4.4.4.1 SOIL AND SEDIMENTS.............................................. 49 4.4.4.2 GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ............ 50 4.4.4.3 AIR................................................................................. 50 4.5 EPA CONCERNS AND COMMENTS (Y-12 URANIUM PHA) .............. 50 4.5.1 CURRENT AND PAST EXPOSURES........................................ 51 4.5.2 EMPHASIS ON SCARBORO ALONE....................................... 56 4.5.3 TECHNICAL RIGOR .................................................................. 57 4.5.4 NEED FOR ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY SAMPLING.......... 57 4.5.5 EPA’S PRESENTATION TO ORRHES...................................... 58 4.5.5.1 GENERAL COMMENTS............................................. 58 4.5.5.2 AIR PATHWAY............................................................ 59 4.5.5.3 SOIL/SEDIMENT PATHWAY.................................... 61 4.5.5.4 FISH/SURFACE WATER PATHWAY........................63 4.6 ATSDR’S STATED POSITION .................................................................. 65 4.7 DOE’S STATED POSITION ....................................................................... 65 5.0 IMPORTANT RELATED ISSUES.......................................................................... 66 5.1 WHAT’S THE MEANING OF “FREE USE” OF EFPC?.......................... 66 5.2 ON-GOING RELEASES TO EFPC............................................................ 67 © ITSPA Rev.1 - 3/23/05 ii INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY, SOCIAL, AND POLICY AWARENESS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 5.0 IMPORTANT RELATED ISSUES (CONT.) 5.3 WHAT’S HAZARDOUS/WHAT’S CONTAMINATED?......................... 69 5.4 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST...................................................................... 69 5.5 DATA: QUESTIONABLE, CENSORED, CLASSIFIED/ RECLASSIFIED, OR LACK OF ............................................................... 70 5.5.1 LACK OF OR QUESTIONABLE DATA ................................... 70 5.5.1.1 LACK OF SOIL CORE SAMPLING AND SURFACE SMEAR DATA........................................... 71 5.5.1.2 QUESTIONABLE EFPC CORE SAMPLING DATA . 73 5.5.1.3 LACK OF DISEASE AND BIRTH DEFECTS REGISTRY DATA........................................................ 75 5.5.1.4 LACK OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS AND CONCERNS DOCUMENTATION .............................. 76 5.5.2 CENSORED OR CLASSIFIED/RECLASSIFIED DATA .......... 78 5.5.2.1 STEVE GOUGH INCIDENT........................................ 78 5.5.2.2 RECLASSIFIED SOIL SAMPLING DATA ................ 79 5.5.2.3 CENSUS TRACT AND EPA DATA............................ 79 5.6 LACK OF KNOWLEDGE.......................................................................... 79 5.6.1 THE CADMUS GROUP SURVEY ............................................. 79 5.6.2 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE REPORT................................. 80 5.7 LACK OF TRUST....................................................................................... 81 5.7.1 THE CADMUS GROUP SURVEY ............................................. 82 5.7.2 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE REPORT................................. 83 6.0 OVERVIEW OF IMPACTED/POTENTIALLY IMPACTED AREAS................. 84 6.1 OVERVIEW OF RELEASES ..................................................................... 84 6.1.1 OAK RIDGE.................................................................................. 84 6.1.2 OTHER.......................................................................................... 87 6.1.2.1 DOWNSTREAM AREAS............................................. 87 6.1.2.1.1 KINGSTON..................................................... 92 6.1.2.1.2 POPLAR CREEK............................................ 92 6.1.2.1.3 CLINCH RIVER.............................................. 92 6.1.2.2 KNOX COUNTY.......................................................... 93 6.2 REMEDIATED SITES................................................................................ 93 6.2.1 EFPC PROPERTIES (I.E., BRUNER SITE, INCLUDING94 CLARK AND STURM SITES) AND NOAA ............................. 94 6.2.2 CITY AND OTHER PROPERTIES............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016-17 2016-2017 Catalog
    Catalog 2016-17 2016-2017 CATALOG GREENEVILLE CAMPUS 60 Shiloh Rd. Greeneville, TN 37743 423-636-7300 KNOXVILLE REGIONAL CENTER 1305 Centerpoint Blvd. Knoxville, TN 37932 865-693-1177 MORRISTOWN CENTER 420 West Morris Blvd., Suite 120 Morristown, TN 37814 423-581-5002 www.tusculum.edu Tusculum College is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges to award baccalaureate and master’s degrees. Contact the Commission at Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 or call 404-679-4500 for questions about the accreditation of Tusculum College. In compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 as amended, and with its own policies and philosophy, Tusculum College does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, age, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, military or veteran status, disability, genetic information, or any other protected discriminatory factor, in its employment practices or in the provision of, or access to, educational programs and services, except where sex, age, or ability represent bona fide educational or employment qualifications. The Tusculum College catalog is not to be construed as a contract. This catalog does present policies and programs as accurately as possible at the time of publication, but the College reserves the right to alter any part or section as deemed necessary. Academic Time/Year .................................................................... 36 ABLE OF ONTENTS Adding and Dropping Classes ...................................................... 36 T C Withdrawal from Class, College ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May 15, 2020 Tennessee Department of Transportation James K. Polk Building, Suite 1800 505 Deaderick Street Nashville, TN 37243
    May 15, 2020 Tennessee Department of Transportation James K. Polk Building, Suite 1800 505 Deaderick Street Nashville, TN 37243-0349 SUBJECT: Amendment to project 20-2014-003 (Alcoa Highway, Pellissippi Pkwy. to Little River IA) Dear TDOT, The Knoxville Regional TPO requests concurrence by TDOT to amend the FY 2020-2023 TIP concerning the following project: Amendment 20-2014-003 (Alcoa Highway, Pellissippi Pkwy. to Little River IA) - Amend TIP to revise the project terminus description, project length and increase the ROW cost. The project description includes reconstructing from a 4-lane to a 6-lane facility, including a frontage road system with two (2) new interchanges (SR-115 at Singleton Station Road and SR-115 at Topside Road (SR-333)); modifying the existing SR-115 and SR-162 interchange, and constructing a multi-use path. The project length is 2.71 miles, and the entire project is in Blount County. The ROW cost increased from $32,200,000 to $57,000,000 in FY 2020. The total project cost increased from $82,350,000 to $107,150,000. This amendment has been incorporated into our FY 2020-2023 TIP. The project pages, expenditure summary sheets, conformity summary report, air quality conformity determination report and federal approval, resolution and planning process self-certification are included. If you have any questions please contact me at (865) 215-3825. Sincerely, Craig Luebke Transportation Planner KNOXVILLE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION KnoxTPO.org | 400 Main Street, Suite 403 | Knoxville, TN 37902 | 865.215.2500 Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2020-2023 ORIGINAL TIP No.
    [Show full text]
  • SHELBY COUNTY Notable Unfunded Transportation Infrastructure Projects Totaling $1 Billion Via Tennessee Department of Transportation
    SHELBY COUNTY Notable Unfunded Transportation Infrastructure Projects Totaling $1 billion Via Tennessee Department of Transportation 1. I-240 - Replacement of 3 Overhead Bridges; Norfolk Southern Railroad (LM 15 45), Poplar Avenue (SR-57 EB LM 15 57), and Poplar Avenue (SR-57 WB LM 15 73): $20 million 2. I-240 - I-55 to Midtown, Memphis: $50 million 3. I-240 - Airways Interchange: $43 million 4. I-269 - Implement Smartway ITS system on SR 385/I-269 from I-40 southward to the Mississippi state line and connect it to the Mississippi ITS system. The implementation of the Smartway ITS system will include the installation of fiber, CCTV cameras, DMS and HAR.: $9 million 5. I-40 - SR-177, Germantown Road, to SR-205, Collierville-Arlington Road: $65.1 million 6. I-69 - Shelby County Portion: $1 billion 7. SR-385 - Extend the current Smartway ITS system eastward on SR 385 from Mile Marker 7 to approximately Mile Marker 15 at the junction of future I-269. The Smartway ITS system extension will include the installation of fiber, CCTV cameras, DMS and HAR.: $4 million 8. SR-1 - US-70/US-79, Summer Avenue; From I-40 to North of Elmore Road: $62.3 million 9. SR-1 - U.S. Highway 70 / 79 Bridge over Loosahatchie River: $9.8 million 10. SR-1 - Summer Avenue Bridge over SR1 / 0K371, 05250 and Railroad: $3.4 million 11. SR-14 - Austin Peay Highway, from Old Covington Pike to Tipton County line: $75.4 million 12. SR-176 - New Getwell Road Bridge over Nonconnah Creek: $3.5 million 13.
    [Show full text]
  • State Technical Institute at Knoxville 1984-85 Catalog
    STATE TECHNICAL INSTITUTE AT KNOXVILLE 1984-85 CATALOG STATE TECHNICAL INSTITUTE AT KNOXVILLE CATALOG 1984-85 State Technical Institute at Knoxville does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, re li gion , national origin, age, handicap, or veteran status in provisions of educational opportunities or employment opportunities and benefits. State Tech does not discriminate on the basis of sex or handicap in the education programs and activities wnich it operates, pursuant to the require­ ments of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. 92-318; and Section 504 of the Rehabi litation Act of 1973, Pub . L. 93-112; respectively. This policy extends to both employment by and admission to the college. In conjunction wi th these requirements STIK provides ramps, elevators, and limited reserved parking to accommodate the needs of handicapped students, staff, and visitors. Inquiries concerning Title IX and Section 504 should be directed to the Director of Administrative Affairs, State Technical Institute at Knoxvil le. Charges of violation of the above policy should also be directed to the Director of Administrative Affairs. PRIVACY RIGHTS ACT OF PARENTS AND STUDENTS PUBLIC LAW 93-380 State Technical Institute at Knoxville adheres to the guidelines developed by the Department of Health , Education and Welfare regarding the Educational Rights and Privacy Act (Buckley Amendment) of 197 4 Public Law 93-380. State Tech provides students and parents of dependent students access to official records directly related to them and limits dissemination of personally identifia­ ble information without the student's consent. Students enrolled at State Techni­ cal Institute at Knoxville may review gui del ines and procedures regarding Public Law 93-380 in the Office of Student Affairs .
    [Show full text]
  • Projects Report
    Report generated on 1/12/2017 Projects Report Est. Cost to County Program Route Project Description Length (mi.) Completion MEADOW ST. BRIDGE OVER RIGHT FORK COAL ANDERSON Local Bridges 0A460 0.010 $425,000 CREEK ANDERSON State Bridges SR-61 STATE HWY. 61 BRIDGE OVER BRUSHY CREEK 0.010 $2,234,000 US-25W (SR- ANDERSON State Bridges US-HWY. 25W BRIDGE OVER BULL RUN CREEK 0.010 $4,802,000 9) ANDERSON Local Bridges 4365 BRIAR CLIFF AVE. BRIDGE OVER BRANCH 0.010 $254,000 ANDERSON Local Bridges 0A276 OLD STATE CIR. BRIDGE OVER BULL RUN CREEK 0.000 $2,419,000 FROM SR-9/US-25W (CLINTON HWY) TO SR-162 ANDERSON Rural Access SR-170 6.180 $88,320,000 (OAK RIDGE HIGHWAY) ITS INSTRUMENTATION AT SR-61 (ANDERSONVILLE ANDERSON Technology I-75 0.100 $500,000 HWY., EXIT 122) INTERCHANGE HORSE MOUNTAIN RD. BRIDGE OVER PANNELL BEDFORD Local Bridges 0A468 0.010 $490,000 CREEK ROWESVILLE CHURCH RD. BRIDGE OVER BEDFORD Local Bridges 0A233 0.010 $640,000 SHIPPMAN CREEK BEDFORD Local Bridges 0A170 KELLERTOWN RD. BRIDGE OVER STRAIGHT CREEK 0.010 $235,000 NORMANDY TO TULLAHOMA RD. BRIDGE OVER BEDFORD State Bridges SR-269 0.010 $121,000 CARR BRANCH US-41A (SR- BEDFORD State Bridges US-41A BRIDGE OVER HOOK CREEK 0.010 $2,287,000 16) WALKING HORSE PKWY. BRIDGE OVER SUGAR BEDFORD State Bridges SR-64 0.010 $3,176,000 CREEK ROY MOORE RD. BRIDGE OVER NORTH FORK BEDFORD Local Bridges 0A048 0.010 $280,000 CREEK BEDFORD Local Bridges 0A122 GREGORY MILL RD.
    [Show full text]
  • SR-162) Interchange at Oak Ridge Hwy (SR-62) in Solway (IA) Lead Agency TDOT Total Project Cost $22,724,000
    June 7, 2021 Tennessee Department of Transportation James K. Polk Building, Suite 1800 505 Deaderick Street Nashville, TN 37243‐0349 SUBJECT: Amendment to project 20‐2017‐057 (Pellissippi Parkway (SR‐162) Interchange at Oak Ridge Highway (SR‐62) in Solway (IA)) Dear TDOT, The Knoxville Regional TPO requests concurrence by TDOT to amend the FY 2020‐2023 TIP concerning the following project: Amendment 20‐2017‐057 ‐ Pellissippi Parkway (SR‐162) Interchange at Oak Ridge Highway (SR‐62) in Solway (IA) ‐ Amend project to revise the project description and update several schedule elements and revise PE‐Design, Right of Way and Construction cost estimates and total project cost to reflect most current estimates and Knox County contributions. The project description is revised to "Reconstruct interchange to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) and provide connection to Solway Road". PE‐N costs of $200,000 NHPP ($160,000 federal/$40,000 state) are revised from FY 2020 to FY 2021. State PE‐ D costs of $300,000 NHPP ($240,000 federal/$60,000 state) are revised from FY 2020 to FY 2021. Local PE‐D costs of $473,000 (100% local) are added in FY 2021. Local ROW costs of $2,500,000 (100% local) are added in FY 2022. Local CN costs of $5,418,000 (100% local) are added in FY 2023. A total of $8,391,000 is added to the project cost (100% local) as well as the TIP. Additional details are revised to reflect $700,000 total funds previously obligated to this project. The total project cost is increased to a corrected $30,615,000.
    [Show full text]
  • PELLISSIPPI PARKWAY EXTENSION (State Route 162) from State Route 33 (Old Knoxville Highway) to US 321/State Route 73/Lamar Alexander Parkway
    RECORD OF DECISION PELLISSIPPI PARKWAY EXTENSION (State Route 162) from State Route 33 (Old Knoxville Highway) to US 321/State Route 73/Lamar Alexander Parkway BLOUNT COUNTY, TENNESSEE Submitted Pursuant to 42 USC 4332(2)(c) U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Tennessee Department of Transportation Cooperating Agencies: US Army Corps of Engineers Tennessee Valley Authority August 2017 Table of Contents LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS .................................................................... EC-1 1. DECISION .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ....................................................................................................... 3 3. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................ 4 3.1. No-Build Alternative ..................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Three Build Alternatives ............................................................................................... 4 3.3. Two Modifications Considered for 2012 Preferred Alternative (A) ................................ 5 4. REEVALUATION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT .......................... 9 5. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE ...............................................................................................10 6. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ...........................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Impact of Lane Use Restrictions for Large Trucks Along I-40 Near Knoxville
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2002 An Evaluation of the Impact of Lane Use Restrictions for Large Trucks Along I-40 near Knoxville Vasin Kiattikomol University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Kiattikomol, Vasin, "An Evaluation of the Impact of Lane Use Restrictions for Large Trucks Along I-40 near Knoxville. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2002. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2077 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Vasin Kiattikomol entitled "An Evaluation of the Impact of Lane Use Restrictions for Large Trucks Along I-40 near Knoxville." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Civil Engineering. Arun Chatterjee, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Frederick J. Wegmann, Lee D. Han Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Vasin Kiattikomol entitled “An Evaluation of the Impact of Lane Use Restrictions for Large Trucks Along I-40 near Knoxville.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Civil Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Road Plan
    2018 Major Road Plan This plan was adopted by: Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission on September 13, 2018 Knox County Commission on October 22, 2018 Knoxville City Council on October 23, 2018 10/23/18 2018 Major Road Plan TABLE OF CONTE NTS SECTION I: Major Road Plan Overview and Description ........................................................................ 1 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 B. Responsibility and Authority ....................................................................................................... 1 C. Right-of-Way Preservation ......................................................................................................... 2 D. Roadway Functional Classification ............................................................................................. 3 E. Roadway Cross Section Standards .............................................................................................. 6 F. Right-of-Way Dedication Requirements ..................................................................................... 7 G. Planned Roadway Projects ......................................................................................................... 8 H. Major Road Plan Implementation and Update Process ............................................................. 9 SECTION II: Table of Roadway Classifications and Right-of-Way .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section III Corridor Design Introduction
    Section Corridor Design III Section III: Corridor Design 28 Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan Section III Corridor Design Introduction The Greenway Vision The vision for this greenway is much more than a linear path. The greenway has potential to connect neighborhoods, to link children to schools, and to bring users to the natural world. It can be key to improving the mental and physical health of residents and workers and be a means of transportation for work and play. Perhaps its greatest potential is to be a major draw of the Technology Corridor, attracting businesses that are drawn to relocate, in part, because of it. The vision is of office parks and campuses that incorporate open space and internal trail systems connecting to the greenway as part of their design. This vision provides opportunities for whole office complexes to have an opportunity for increased health and productivity, for bike commuters to utilize the system to get to work, and for reduced motor vehicle traffic because of increased greenway use for transportation. This vision promotes the redevelopment of the Solway area surrounding Melton Hill Lake, creating a more vibrant, walkable commercial experience that is oriented toward the Lake and connects to Melton Lake Greenway, Haw Ridge, the UT Arboretum, and Oak Ridge. This vision sets defining principles that drive corridor design. Existing site conditions, opportunities, constraints, and input from the Technical Advisory Committee and public all have informed the corridor design recommendations. Design Principles of the Greenway Below are guiding principles to design the preferred and alternative greenway corridors: Connect Infrastructure, Connect People.
    [Show full text]
  • Knox County Schools How to Get There
    Knox County Schools How to Get There MO–106 (7/05) Revised July 2005 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS A.L. LOTTS ELEMENTARY 9320 Westland Drive Knoxville, TN 37922 539-8611 TRAVELING WEST ON KINGSTON PIKE turn left at Peters Rd. traffic light (Town & Country Shopping Center is on your right). Continue about 1/3 mile to STOP. Go through STOP and around slight bend and over the railroad tacks. You will pass Ebenezer United Methodist Church on your right. Shortly after you will come to Westland Drive (lots of construction!). Turn right onto Westland and travel about 1-2 miles - school will be on your left. ADRIAN BURNETT ELEMENTARY 4521 Brown Gap Rd. Knoxville, TN 37918 689-1474 TAKE 1-40 TO 1-640 EASTBOUND and exit 1-640 at Broadway; turn right; you'll be heading North. Continue approximately 3.6 miles. On your left you will pass Curtis Lane, and Black Oak Ridge Lane. Just after Black Oak Ridge, you will come to a street on your right; this is Brown Gap Road, but there is no street sign. There is a gas station on this right comer. Turn right onto Brown Gap and continue approximately 1 mile. Adrian Burnett will be on your left. AMHERST ELEMENTARY 7201 Ballcamp Pike Knoxville, TN 37931 TAKE 1-40 TO 1-640 and take the second Western Avenue exit. Go west on Western Avenue for 3.8 miles. Turn left onto Ballcamp Pike. Go 1.3 miles. Amherst Elementary will be on your right. BALL CAMP PRIMARY 9801 Middlebrook Pike Knoxville, TN 37931 539-7888 FROM THE WEST take 1-40 to Cedar Bluff Road exit north.
    [Show full text]
  • TENNESSEE STATEWIDE MULTIMODAL FREIGHT PLAN Tennessee Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan
    TENNESSEE STATEWIDE MULTIMODAL FREIGHT PLAN Tennessee Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan CONTENTS 1. Strategic Goals .......................................................................................... 1-1 2. Economic Context of Freight Transportation Planning ........................... 2-1 3. Freight Policies, Strategies, and Institutions ........................................... 3-1 4. State Freight Transportation Assets ........................................................ 4-1 5. Conditions and Performance of the State’s Transportation System ...... 5-1 6. Freight Forecast ........................................................................................ 6-1 7. Overview of Trends, Needs, and Issues ................................................... 7-1 8. Tennessee’s Freight Transportation System Strengths & Challenges ... 8-1 9. The State’s Decision-Making Process ..................................................... 9-1 10. Tennessee’s Freight Improvement Strategy .......................................... 10-1 11. Implementation Plan .............................................................................. 11-1 Tennessee Department of Transportation Tennessee Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan CONTENTS 1. Strategic Goals.................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Relationship to fixing America’s surface transportation (FAST) Act ...............
    [Show full text]