DOCSLIB.ORG

The Strength of Political Parties in Tanzania - a Focus on Local Government Councilor’S By-Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Strength of Political Parties in Tanzania - a Focus on Local Government Councilor’S By-Elections African Journal of History and Culture (AJHC) Vol. 1 (3), pp. 044-053, September, 2009 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJHC © 2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper The strength of political parties in Tanzania - A focus on local government councilor’s by-elections A. S. Norman The Institute of Training Research and Consultancy-International, Tanzania. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 24 July, 2009 This paper examines the strength of political parties in Tanzania Mainland focusing on the local government councilors by-elections of 2004. The first part provides an introduction, which explains the two types of strengths; that is, the number of voters supporting the party and the number of contestants willing to contest through the same. The second part covers the administration of local government elections in Tanzania. The third part covers the strength of political parties and the number of parties which participated in the elections and their stances. Managing political parties is the fourth part, and the conclusion is the fifth part. I find that the strength of political parties varies and is associated with several factors, including youthfulness and ability to manage political parties as organizations. However, the strongest party in terms of the averages of votes attained is United Democratic Party (UDP), while the strongest party on the aggregate of the factors assessed is Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM). On the other hand the party that has experienced the most drastic fall is NCCR- Mageuzi and the party that is experiencing most tremendous growth is Chama Cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (CHADEMA). The study has further revealed that Civic United Front (CUF) has kept pace in winning more electors in the Tanzania mainland than in the past elections. Key words: Political parties, strength, elections. INTRODUCTION The strength of political parties can be determined in includes attempts by some party leaders or contestants various ways subject to the eye of the examiner and the to enquire the electoral management body through the objectives of such examination. However, the common court to consider disallowing some other candidates from phenomenon is through number of people that support continuing with the elections due the grounds put forward the political party, as expressed through votes attained in by the petitioner. The attempt of some candidates filing a particular election. The second criterion is the number such petitions automates them to be known by the people of contestants who vied in such elections. as elections petitions are covered extensively by the There is, however, a tendency of conflating popularity media, hence they become popular. In Tanzania for of a political party with strength or acceptance. Some example Rev. Christopher Mtikira is popular despite the political party and/or leaders are popular due to the fact that his party is none among the ten strong parties, if uncommon behavior observed by the leaders or followers elections held in the year 1995, 2000 and 2005 are of such a party. The tendency of some leaders to considered. The trend on such popularity does not frequently petition on matters related to governance and necessarily mean acceptance. Thus, popularity of a poli- elections may capture the attention of the electors and tical party does not guarantee strength or acceptance. lead to popularity (Mtikira is connected with fighting for Perhaps, if a study was to be conducted in South Africa justice in Tanzania hence many people know him in 1985 - 1995, the most popular party would be the essentially because of petitioning and indeed winning Ikhatha led by Mangosuthu Buthelezi, while the strongest some important cases such as private contestants as party would be the African National Congress (ANC) led opposed to being member of political party). If at all the by Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, and latter Thabo Mbeki petitions can draw the attention of the majority people, (The Inkhata party in South Africa is popular. The popula- such behavior may lead into popularity of that person and rity is backed by many trends including behaviors of the even the party is representing - petitions in elections followers). Norman 045 Therefore observing elections through an eye of Maendeleo (CHADEMA). In 2000 general elections the specialist, popularity does not necessarily mean accep- arrangement of the parties order in terms of strength tance. Nevertheless, the number of votes a party attains changed. The strongest part was CCM, followed by CUF, may reflect acceptance/strength. Also the number of TLP, CHADEMA and NCCR-Mageuzi (NEC, 2000). In candidates contesting through the political party may also 2004 there were about 49 vacant wards which had to reflect acceptance of the political party. In this view this have elections so as to get representatives in those paper examines strength or acceptance/strength of areas. Vacant wards, just like vacant constituency hap- political parties in the local government councilors by pen through several reasons including death of the elections in Tanzania held on 11 January, 2004. In this councilor or Member of Parliament, insanity and impri- discussion therefore the strength of the political has been sonment. And when an election is conducted due to any used to reflect acceptance. Since the strength of the reason after General Election, it is known as by-election. party is actually weighed base on the two criteria: (1) the Hence, this article presents a discussion of the 49 number of people supporting the party through votes, and councilors by elections of 2004 articulating the factors (2) the number of contestants willing to stand/contest mentioned which are votes attained by political parties through the same party. (seats attained) and number of contestants fielded in the parties. Political parties in Tanzania ADMINISTERING THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT Tanzania practiced Mult-party democracy for the first time ELECTIONS in 1960 - 1964 (Msekwa, 2005). In 1964 the government under the presidency of Mwalimu Julius Nyerere aban- The power to conduct local government elections and by doned the mult-party democracy and decided to con- elections in Tanzania is vested in the National Electoral verge into single party system of parties. One of the Commission (URT, 1977). The Commission as an reasons for converging into one party system was the Elections Management Body (EMB) administers all pro- results of general elections of 1960/1961 which saw cedures through mandates of appointing electoral staff in TANU winning all seats except one (Msekwa, 2006). The various wards and councils (ACT, 1/1985 and Act 4/1979 elections revealed strength of the parties for the first time. sets the procedures and mandates of the Elections Nyerere felt that it was evident that Tanzanians had the Management Body in Tanzania, and that such mandates view that TANU was the party to bring fortune to the shall be vested to National Electoral Commission (NEC). country. Another reason was the union of Tanganyika Therefore, the electoral commission made a formal and Zanzibar which was officiated on 26 April, 1964. It announcement of the by elections which indicated that 41 was felt that both parts of the union should have one wards were vacant, and that the registration of voters strong party which will enable the people to participate as would start on 15 - 21 October, 2003, and the nomination one for the better of the nation. day would be on 22 October, 2003. Further, the timetable Hence TANU was strong and thus dominant on indicated that elections materials would be at the polling Tanzania mainland (then Tanganyika) and Afro-Shiraz district on 2nd - 7th January, 2004. The plan of actions Party (ASP) was strong and thus dominant on Tanzania concluded with Election Day on 11 January, 2004. Zanzibar. On 5th February, 1977 the two sister parties Generally the NEC conformed to every activity as TANU and A.S.P united to form one strong revolutionary scheduled in the plan of action. party in the name of Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM). Therefore CCM enjoyed supremacy since 1977 - 1992 when the re-introduction of Mult-party came into being. Registration The re-introduction of mult-party system marked a new history in Tanzania. In 1995 the first Mult-party election Registration started smoothly in 39 wards and was run was conducted and saw CCM emerging winner in from 15th - 21st October, 2003 (The elections in all wards presidential, parliamentary and local government elec- were conducted smoothly. Except for the two wards tions (councilors) elections (NEC, 1996). In this regard Mbezi and Shungabweni in Mkuranga district, Cost Norman (1997) notes that the strength of political parties region elections were postponed and thus were held from can be assessed in two ways: 1) votes attained by a 27th October to 9th November 2003). political party which is also reflected on the number of The total number of people registered for all wards that seats attained by the party 2) Number of people willing to conducted elections was 104,784; nevertheless, turnout contest through the same party. was 86,971, being 43 - 123% representing the minimum From the two criterion it can be revealed that during the and maximum ward attained respectively. The highest 1995 General Election CCM was the strongest party registration was marked by the Hamugembe Ward in followed by NCCR-Mageuzi, Civic United Front (CUF) Bukoba Town Council which attained 123% of the antici- and the fourth party was Chama cha Demokrasia na pated and the lowest was marked by Nsalaga in Mbeya 046 Afr. J. History Culture Table 1. Number of wards each political party contested and the performance. S/No. Name of Political Wards Wards % Wards Votes % Votes Average Votes Party Contested Elected Contested Attained Attained per Ward 1. CCM 41 39 100 46.975 65.36 1.146 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of Politics in Tanzania
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. TANZANIA RICHARD SHABA July 2007 State of Politics in Tanzania www.kas.de/kenia INTRODUCTION The assessment dwells on the political, eco- nomic and social situation as well on the THERE is a broad consensus that the major actors namely: the ruling and opposi- process of consolidating the transition tion political parties, civil society and the towards participatory political system media, the rise of fundamentalism factor in Tanzania over the past seventeen together with the influence of the external years has achieved remarkable suc- factor in shaping the political process. cess. Whereas once predominantly un- der a single party hegemony, Tanzania THE STATE OF THE ECONOMY AND SO- today is characterized by a plurality of CIAL SERVICES political parties. Though slow; the growth of the independent civil society Ranked 159 th out of 175 countries on the has gained momentum. Human Development Index [HDI] by the United Nations, Tanzania is one of the poor- The country has also witnessed a dramatic est countries in the world. And although transformation of the press. State-owned the economy is growing, it is still very much media outfits that had a virtual monopoly externally oriented with almost 100 percent for decades have now changed their accent of development expenditure externally fi- and become outlets for different voices, not nanced basically by donors. Internal reve- just the ruling party - a major step towards nue collection has not met the objective of promoting democratic practice. This para- collecting at least 18.5 per cent of the GDP digm shift has also helped engender a criti- growth rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Violence in Zanzibar – Ongoing Risk of Violence in Zanzibar 15 March 2011
    Country Advice Tanzania Tanzania – TZA38321 – Revolutionary State Party (CCM) – Civic United Front (CUF) – Election violence in Zanzibar – Ongoing risk of violence in Zanzibar 15 March 2011 1. Please provide a background of the major political parties in Tanzania focusing on the party in power and the CUF. The United Republic of Tanzania was formed in 1964 as a union between mainland Tanganyika and the islands of Unguja and Pemba, which together comprise Zanzibar. Since 1977, it has been ruled by the Revolutionary State Party (Chama Cha Mapinduzi or CCM). In 1992 the government legislated for multiparty democracy, and the country is now a presidential democratic republic with a multiparty system. The first multiparty national elections were held in 1995, and concurrent presidential and parliamentary elections have since been held every 5 years. The CCM has won all elections to date. The CUF, founded in 1991, constituted the main opposition party following the 1995 multiparty elections.1 At the most recent elections in October 2010, the CCM‟s Jakaua Kikwete was re-elected President with 61.7% of the vote (as compared to 80% of the vote in 2005) and the CCM secured almost 80% of the seats. Most of the opposition votes went to the Chadema party, which displaced the Civic United Front (CUF) for the first time as the official opposition. The opposition leader is Chadema‟s Chairman, Freeman Mbowe. Chadema‟s presidential candidate, Willibrod Slaa, took 27% of the vote, while CUF‟s Ibrahim Lipumba received 8%.2 Notwithstanding the CCM‟s election success, the BBC reports that Kikwete‟s “political legitimacy has been seen by some to have been somewhat dented in the 2010 elections”, given the decline in his percent of the vote, and a total election turnout of only 42%, down from 72% in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authoritarian Turn in Tanzania
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery The Authoritarian Turn in Tanzania Dan Paget is a PhD candidate at the University of Oxford, where he is writing his thesis on election campaigning in sub-Saharan Africa, and in particular the uses of the rally. While living in Tanzania in 2015, he witnessed the general election campaign and the beginning of Magufuli’s presidency first-hand. Abstract Since 2015, Tanzania has taken a severe authoritarian turn, accompanied by rising civil disobedience. In the process, it has become a focal point in debates about development and dictatorship. This article unpicks what is happening in contemporary Tanzania. It contends that Tanzania is beset by a struggle over its democratic institutions, which is rooted in rising party system competition. However, this struggle is altered by past experience in Zanzibar. The lessons that both government and opposition have drawn from Zanzibar make the struggle in mainland Tanzania more authoritarian still. These dynamics amount to a new party system trajectory in Tanzania Dan Paget 2 The Tanzanian general election of 2015 seemed like a moment of great democratic promise. Opposition parties formed a pre-electoral coalition, which held. They were joined by a string of high-profile defectors from the ruling CCM (Chama cha Mapinduzi, or the Party of the Revolution). The defector-in-chief, Edward Lowassa, became the opposition coalition’s presidential candidate and he won 40 per cent of the vote, the strongest showing that an opposition candidate has ever achieved in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Fadiga-Stewart Leslie Diss.Pdf (954.6Kb)
    THE GENDER GAP IN AFRICAN PARTY SYSTEMS by Leslie Ann Fadiga-Stewart, B.A., M.A. A DISSERTATION IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Dennis Patterson Chairperson of the Committee John Barkdull Glen Biglasier Ambassador Tibor Nagy, Jr. Accepted John Borrelli Dean of the Graduate School August, 2007 Copyright 2007, Leslie Ann Fadiga-Stewart Texas Tech University, Leslie Fadiga-Stewart, August 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It was a joy working with my advisor, Dr. Dennis Patterson. He provided valuable guidance and assistance and made this whole process easier because he was so supportive, understanding, and generous with his time. He saw my research project as an opportunity to learn something new and his positive attitude, infinite patience, and constant support are gifts I will share with my own students. I would also like to thank the members of my dissertation committee for their patience, feedback, and encouragement. I had the opportunity to work with Dr. Barkdull during my first year as his teaching assistant and valued the fact that he was fair, open-minded, and pushed students to think critically. I only had a chance to know Dr. Glen Biglasier for a short time, but appreciated his enthusiasm, kindness, and his suggestions along the way. It was also wonderful to have Ambassador Nagy on my committee and he provided invaluable insights from his experience from living and working in Africa. I want to offer many thanks to Dr. Susan Banducci for her support while she was at Texas Tech and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • BDP Mps Refuse Pay
    The PatriotWARNING: on Sunday | www.thepatriot.co.bw Stay Home, | May Wash 03, 2020 hands with Soap & Water, Avoid crowds, Don’t Touch, Hug or KissNews 1 www.thepatriot.co.bw MAY 03, 2020 | ISSUE 372 P12.00 BDP MPs refuse pay cut COVID-19 • Tsogwane to approach MPs for salary cut • Backbenchers to reject Cabinet proposal confidentiality • ‘Cabinet donated their salaries voluntarily’ - BDP Whip Kablay BAKANG TIRO Chairman Slumber Tsogwane, who is “I haven’t received any official When reached for comment, BDP Letlhakeng-Lephephe MP said. critical [email protected] also the Vice President. It has always information with regards to us to Chief Whip Liakat Kablay who also Asked if they are to be forced to been believed that the backbenchers donate voluntarily take salary cut to forms part of the backbench, said contribute how he will respond, he ruling Botswana will easily accept a pay cut as donate to COVID-19 but if someone he is not aware of any information Kablay held that MPs have authority • Data censorship prevents stigmatisation Democratic Party (BDP) donation to the COVID-19 relief brings that up it will cause an uproar regarding MPs expected to take pay to decide what they do with their -Govt T backbench is refusing to take fund in solidarity with cabinet. within the party. As an MP I am also cuts. money. a pay cut as contribution to COVID- Sources indicated that most of affected economically,” said one BDP He said cabinet agreed on its He advised his colleagues that • Tough balancing exercise; patients’ 19 Relief Fund just weeks after the BDP backbench have found MP who preferred anonymity.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICA RISK CONSULTING Tanzania Monthly Briefing
    AFRICA RISK CONSULTING Tanzania Monthly Briefing December 2020 Tanzania Summary 4 December 2020 President John Magufuli (2015-present) outlines his priorities for his second and final term in office during the inauguration of parliament on 13 November following the resounding win of the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) in the October general election. While Magufuli has signalled further assistance for the private sector, his delay in appointing a full cabinet has further slowed government engagement. The protracted downturn in tourism globally is putting Tanzania’s economy, and its levels of foreign exchange reserves, under strain. Tanzania fares moderately compared to its regional neighbours in the Mo Ibrahim Foundation’s annual Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG). Magufuli’s second term off to a slow start President John Magufuli (2015-present) outlined his priorities for his second, and final, term in office at the inauguration of parliament on 13 November.1 Magufuli won the 28 October election with 84.4% of the popular vote, while the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party won an overwhelming majority in the National Assembly.2 Although there were significant concerns both within Tanzania and among international observers about the level of government interference in the polls,3 the National Electoral Commission (NEC) has upheld the results and the focus has now shifted to what Magufuli’s second term in office is likely to look like. During the inauguration speech, Magufuli vowed to continue to prosecute his broadly successful anti- corruption campaign, which has seen Tanzania rise from 119th place in 2014 to 96th place in 2019 in Germany-based non-governmental organisation Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perceptions Index during his time in office.4 Magufuli also committed to work further to see the country industrialise, with a focus on job creation and infrastructure, as well as commitment to ensure that the country’s key economic indicators remain stable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weak Link the Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Natural Resource Management
    OXFAM RESEARCH REPORT THE WEAK LINK THE ROLE OF LOCAL INSTITUTIONS IN ACCOUNTABLE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TANZANIA COVER: Open-pit gold mines like this one bring high environmental and social costs to countries like Tanzania, and need to bring in revenues that can be used to offset negative effects. Brett Eloff / Oxfam America 2 Oxfam America | The Weak Link: The Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Resource Management, Tanzania CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Sociopolitical and economic overview ............................................................ 10 Format of the report…………………………………………………………………11 2. Methods and conceptual framings ................................................................. 13 3. Revenue sharing in Tanzania ........................................................................ 15 Mining ............................................................................................................ 15 Oil and gas..................................................................................................... 17 Understanding revenue-sharing policy: Mining ............................................... 19 Understanding revenue-sharing policy: Petroleum, oil and gas ...................... 26 Accountability in revenue sharing ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Or an Agency of Political Domination? Reassessing the Future of the Tanzanian Union
    IJGR 13_2-07-Kjil TronvollF 7/6/06 10:35 AM Page 223 International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 13: 223–241, 2006. 223 © Koninklijke Brill NV. Printed in the Netherlands. Bridging Divided Identities – or an Agency of Political Domination? Reassessing the Future of the Tanzanian Union KJETIL TRONVOLL* 1. Introduction Tanzania is often portrayed as an African success story of state and nation-building, surrounded by neighbouring countries which have been ridden by conflicts and grave human rights violations during the post-colonial period. The successive Tanzanian governments have, by most observers, been characterised as fairly benign and accountable, although the radical ujamaa policy has in retrospect been increasingly criticised.1 Despite this weakness of an indigenous brand of African socialism, the ‘father of the nation’, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, has left a legacy of political toler- ance and nationhood on line with few other African independence leaders. This is in particular noteworthy considering the fact that Tanzania is a political Union, estab- lished in 1964 by the two independent, sovereign states of Tanganyika and Zanzibar. The success of the Tanzanian polity is partly based on developing and formulating a national political discourse, where ethnic or parochial sentiments have been muted. This legacy of Nyerere has seemingly forged a vibrant and all-embracing Tanzanian identity. Or, this is how it was perceived until the fall of the single-party doctrine in the early 1990s. The introduction of a multiparty democratic system in Tanzania in 1992, and thus the broadening of civil and political rights in the country, has inspired a renewed interest in the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania: Recent Governance Trends and 2020 Elections in Brief
    Tanzania: Recent Governance Trends and 2020 Elections In Brief Updated October 26, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46579 Tanzania: Recent Governance Trends and 2020 Elections In Brief Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 President Magufuli .......................................................................................................................... 1 Governance Trends Under Magufuli ......................................................................................... 2 Limits on Organized Political Rights and Political Party Activity...................................... 2 Restrictions on Expression, the Press, and Independent Research ..................................... 4 Curtailing the Independence of Civil Society ..................................................................... 5 The Government’s Human Rights Record and Rhetoric........................................................... 5 Elections: Recent Trends and 2020 General Elections .................................................................... 6 October 2020 Elections ............................................................................................................. 8 U.S. Relations and Congressional Responses ................................................................................. 9 U.S. Governance Programs .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Registrar of Political Parties
    OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF POLITICAL PARTIES A LIST OF FULLY REGISTERED POLITICAL PARTIES AS AT 31st JULY, 2020 www.orpp.go.tz NO Registration Name of the Party and Date Two National Leaders of the Party Leaders Position Physical Address, Postal . No. of Permanent Registration and Office Status Address, Telephone, Fax and email His Excel. Dr. John Pombe Magufuli Chairperson 1. No. 0000001 Chama cha Mapinduzi (CCM) Dr. Bashiru Ally Kakurwa Secretary General 0754 022915 [email protected] 01st July, 1992 Head Quarters Kuu Street, Dodoma P.O. Box 50 Dodoma Tel +255 26 2322982 Fax: +255 26 2322965 Website: www.ccm.or.tz Email: [email protected] Lumumba Street P.O. Box 9151 Dar-es Salaam Sub-Head Quarters Tel. +255 22 2182200 Fax: +255 22 2185245 Kisiwandui Karume Road, Unguja Sub-Head Quarters P.O Box 875 Zanzibar Fax +255 24 2239342 0773 789820 Admin. Mr. Professor Ibrahim Haruna Chairperson 0684 625442 2. No. 0000002 The Civic United Front (CUF- Lipumba [email protected] Chama cha Wananchi) in vacant Secretary General 0772 444828 short CUF [email protected] Mtendeni Street 21st January, 1993 Mjini Magharibi, Unguja P.O. Box 2124 Head Quarters Zanzibar Plot No. 98 Block A Buguruni Pandya 1 Sub-Head Quarters P.O. Box 10979 Dar es Salaam Tell. +255 22 861009 Fax. +255 22 861010 0783 588280 DSG BARA Hon. Freeman Aikael Mbowe Chairperson 0784 779944 3. No. 0000003 Chama cha Demokrasia na Hon. John John Mnyika Secretary General 0784 222222 Maendeleo (CHADEMA) House No. 170 Ufipa Street, Kinondoni P.O. Box 31191 21st January, 1993 Head Quarters Dar es Salaam Tel: +255 22 2668866 Web: www.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania: Recent Governance Trends and 2020 Elections in Brief
    Tanzania: Recent Governance Trends and 2020 Elections In Brief Updated October 26, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46579 Tanzania: Recent Governance Trends and 2020 Elections In Brief Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 President Magufuli .......................................................................................................................... 1 Governance Trends Under Magufuli ......................................................................................... 2 Limits on Organized Political Rights and Political Party Activity...................................... 2 Restrictions on Expression, the Press, and Independent Research ..................................... 4 Curtailing the Independence of Civil Society ..................................................................... 5 The Government’s Human Rights Record and Rhetoric........................................................... 5 Elections: Recent Trends and 2020 General Elections .................................................................... 6 October 2020 Elections ............................................................................................................. 8 U.S. Relations and Congressional Responses ................................................................................. 9 U.S. Governance Programs .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democratisation's Third Wave and the Challenges of Democratic Deepening
    Good Governance, Aid Modalities and Poverty Reduction: Linkages to the Millennium Development Goals and Implications for Irish Aid Research project (RP-05-GG) of the Advisory Board for Irish Aid Working Paper 1 Democratisation’s Third Wave and the Challenges of Democratic Deepening: Assessing International Democracy Assistance and Lessons Learned Lise Rakner (Chr. Michelsen Institute), Alina Rocha Menocal (ODI) and Verena Fritz (ODI) August 2007 Disclaimer and acknowledgements The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Advisory Board for Irish Aid or those of any of the organisations in the research consortium implementing the project. The authors thank Bill Morton of the North-South Institute for comments on a previous draft, and Tammie O’Neil and Jo Adcock (ODI) for excellent editorial assistance. Responsibility for the content of published version remains with the authors. Overseas Development Institute 111 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7JD, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7922 0300 Fax: +44 (0)20 7922 0399 www.odi.org.uk ii Contents Executive summary ...........................................................................................................v 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.1 The emergence of democracy assistance............................................................................... 1 1.2 Democracy assistance and the broader ‘good governance’ agenda .....................................
    [Show full text]