1 of 256

Nuclear Crime Attacks Against Holy St. Peters Church, The Vatican: Discovery of 'hot' Radiation evidence . . ., © 2009, by Kenneth MacKenzie -- includes fifteen page SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Docket No. 08-9595, PETITION FOR REHEARING OF A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

. . . INTRODUCTION: . . . Should the Holy St. Peters become "Nuclear Crime" cross- contaminated as the consequence of a Radiological attack against the presence of U.S. Corporations doing business in and , especially as the consequence of a Radiological attack against U.S. Corporations doing business in Italy and Rome, then it is certain that one fifth of the earth's population will eventually have passionate questions about the responsibility of the United States in contributing to "Nuclear Crime" cross-contamination of the Holy St. Peters. . . This book explains how the Holy St. Peters could become a victim of the United States wars in Italy and Rome. . . . Petitioner Kenneth MacKenzie has therefore decided that it is worthwhile to make efforts to defend the Holy St. Peters and litigate crime tort claims against those United States Corporations most responsible for endangering the Holy St. Peters with the potential of "Nuclear Crime" cross-contamination of Holy St. Peters and the entire -State. . . . Plaintiff MacKenzie's legal efforts to defend the Holy St. Peters have the simple goal of seeking United Nations International Criminal Court judgments in condemnation of U.S. Corporation presence in Italy and Rome and to thereby persuade the world that U.S. Corporation presence in Italy and Rome endangers world Nuclear Peace, and that all U.S. Corporations should divest and leave Italy and Rome. . . . MacKenzie could say much worse against the presence of U.S. commercial corporations in Italy and Rome and how their presence in Italy and Rome endangers the national security of the United States and her allies. However, MacKenzie leaves that judgment to the courts and the readers of this book.

1 of 256 2 of 256

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

CHAPTER 1 . . . Pg. 4 . . . History of Holy St. Peters with photos of St. Peters inside Vatican City, Rome, Italy. WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) : CHAPTER 2 . . . Pg 16 Defendants D#1 through D#17 owe multi-billion dollar damages to the people and nation of Italy and Rome CHAPTER 3 . . . Pg. 26 . . . War against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” CHAPTER 4 . . . Pg. 35 . . . War against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” CHAPTER 5 . . . Pg. 44. . Radiological landmines on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear 'Target Magnets' . . . equivalent to the 20 kiloton Russian RA115 . . . described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 . . . same Radiological damage as U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War Two. CHAPTER 6 . . . Pg 56 History of Holy St. Peters with photos of St. Peters inside courtyard of Vatican City buildings and basilica. CHAPTER 7 . . . Pg. 81 . . . Radiological landmines on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear 'Target Magnets' . . . equivalent to the 20 kiloton Russian RA115 . . . described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 . . . same Radiological damage as U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War Two. CHAPTER 8 . . . Pg. 88. . . ceiling painted by Michelangelo between 1508 and 1512, CHAPTER 9 . . . Pg. 115 . . Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction ("WMD") in Iraq that might be used in "Nuclear Crimes' against U.S. targets in the U.S., U.S. Corporation targets in ITALY AND Europe, and used against U.S. Corporation targets located in Italy and Rome. CHAPTER 10 . . . Pg. 128 . . . LETTERS FROM CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHAPTER 11 . . . Pg. 156 . . . U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL

2 of 256 3 of 256

BRIEF. Plaintiffs submit this brief in an effort to list additional particular facts regarding this matter as it has been presented as a Crime Tort Claim to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome . CHAPTER 12 . . . Pg. 197 U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF #3 : WAR CRIME COMPLAINT AGAINST Gray Miller, Defendant in his private persona 'aka' U.S. Judge Gray Miller (Defendant Gray Miller) CHAPTER 13 . . Pg. 232 PETITION FOR REHEARING OF A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO U.S. COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PREFACE :

This book is dedicated to protecting Holy St. Peters and is dedicated to peace for people of the Christian Catholic faith. Wikipedia acknowledgements: . . . The Author most gratefully acknowledges Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, as a source for his quotations of Wikipedia photographs and Wikipedia supplemental text describing the history of great Mosques and man-portable Nuclear weapons and the Terrorists who tortured to death Pvt. Kristian Kenchaca and Pvt. Thomas Tucker as cited in this book. Should the reader desire further more detailed information on the history of these great mosques or Nuclear Weapons and terrorists, the Author recommends Wikipedia sites as follows: See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masjid_al-Haram SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_uranium_mines SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Muhajer : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

3 of 256 4 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 1 . . . History of Holy St. Peter's with photos of St. Peter's inside Vatican City, Rome, Italy. WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. Court Case H- 08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) : . . . History & Burial site of St. Peter, 's tomb After the crucifixion of in the second quarter of the 1st century AD, it is recorded in the Biblical book of the Acts of the Apostles that one of his twelve disciples, Simon known as Peter, a fisherman from Galilee, took a leadership position among Jesus' followers and was of great importance in the founding of the Christian Church. The name Peter is "Petrus" in and "Petros" in Greek, deriving from "petra" which means "stone" or "rock" in Greek. It is believed by a long tradition that Peter, after a ministry of about thirty years, traveled to Rome and met his martyrdom there.

The Alter over St. Peter's burial tomb in the Basilica.

According to the traditional story, Peter was executed in the year 64 AD during the reign of the Roman Emperor Nero. His execution was one of the many martyrdoms of Christians following the Great Fire of Rome. He was said to have been crucified head downwards, by his own request, near the obelisk in the . This obelisk now stands in Saint Peter's Square and is revered as a "witness" to Peter's death. It is one of several ancient Obelisks of Rome.

The traditional story goes on to say that Peter's remains were buried just outside the Circus, on the Mons Vaticanus across the Via Cornelia from the Circus, less than 150 metres (490 ft) from his place of death. The Via Cornelia (which may have been known by another name to the ancient Romans) was a road which ran east-to-west along the north wall of the Circus on land now

4 of 256 5 of 256 covered by the southern portions of the Basilica and Saint Peter's Square. Peter's grave was initially marked simply by a red rock, symbolic of his name, but meaningless to non-Christians. A shrine was built on this site some years later. Almost three hundred years later, Old Saint Peter's Basilica was constructed over this site. It is possible that the exact location of Peter's grave was known with certainty by Christians throughout all this time and that therefore the traditional location of Saint Peter's tomb is, in fact, its true location.

. . . On December 23, 1950, in his pre-Christmas radio broadcast to the world, Pius XII announced the discovery of Saint Peter's tomb.[9] This was the culmination of 10 years of archaeological research under the crypt of the basilica, an area inaccessible since the 9th century. The burial place appears to have been an underground vault, with a structure above it believed to have been built by Pope Anacletus in the 1st century. Human remains were discovered, but it could not be determined if they were, in fact, the bones of the Apostle Peter. Indeed, the area now covered by the Vatican City had been a cemetery for some years before the Circus of Nero was built. It was a burial ground for the numerous executions in the Circus and for many years after the burial of Saint Peter many Christians chose to be buried near him. It is likely that any excavation anywhere on the Vatican grounds would discover human remains.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT: U.S. SUPREME COURT & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

. . . .1. WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. SUPREME Court Case 08-9595 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) : . . . (1) U.S. Corporation Businesses are "Nuclear Crime" targets in Rome, Italy, and are "Nuclear Crime" targets in Monaco, Vatican, & France, Europe, making these countries potential victims of Nuclear Contamination Crimes. "Nuclear Radiological Crime" attacks in Italy mean 'Nuclear-Crime'

5 of 256 6 of 256

Contamination of Holy St. Peters & 'Nuclear-Crime' Contamination of 3.5 million St. Peter's pilgrims in Rome, Italy.

U.S. SUPREME COURT BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

. . . The following is a 'Nuclear Crime tort' Claim to the Attorneys General / Ministers of Justice in Italy and the other European countries . The same 'Nuclear Crime' truths described in the following Claim to any Minister of Justice are virtually "irrefutable." The same pleadings apply in Italy and Rome, Europe, UK, USA, and so-forth.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, The Hague, The Netherlands Al Qaida Terrorists have several times announced intent to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries. And, Plaintiffs are victims of Terrorist intent and efforts to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries. This means that Hilton Hotels and other large U.S. Corporation holdings will

6 of 256 7 of 256 be facing some questions in Italy and Rome, especially if the Holy St. Peters shows positive when scanned by a Geiger Counter, now, or in the future. . . . Remainder of this letter is attached at Appendix 1. 'Nuclear Crime Claim' follows. Sincerely, Kenneth MacKenzie, Plaintiff and Claimant of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE, ITALY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Notice of 'Qui Tam' Claim to Minister of Justice, Italy, For Damage, Injury And Death

Submitted To: Minister of Justice for Italy, Ministry of Justice Ufficio del Capo del Dipartimento per gli Affari di giustizia CAPO DEL DIPARTIMENTO – Italo Ormanni VICE CAPO DEL DIPARTIMENTO VICARIO – Maria Teresa Saragnano VICE CAPO DEL DIPARTIMENTO – Alfonso Malato Via Arenula, 70 – 00186 Roma, tel. +39 06.68851, fax +39 06.68897768

Claimants (See Appendix 1 for Claimants' addresses):

Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez

Menchaca; Claimant #3. The Government and People of Italy and Rome (listed as 'presumed

Claimant' War Crime victims interested in justice); #4. All Other Claimants, . . .(See Appendix 1 for “Further Claimant” names & addresses) . . .,

Claimants

7 of 256 8 of 256 against

Defendants (See Appendix 2 for Defendant List and addresses):

D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and

Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann

Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley

Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4

Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and

Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan

Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton

Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant

FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome;

D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492, Italy and

Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16

Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17

Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); IP#18

Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19

Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya

Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties

______

Interested Parties (see Apendix for address information of Interested Parties) :

Interested Parties (#1), U.S. news media: CNN; NBC; ABC; BBC;

Interested Parties (#2), British news media: BBC

Interested Parties (#3), Italy and Rome news media

8 of 256 9 of 256

Interested Parties (#4), European news media

Interested Parties (#5), Middle East news media

______

PRELIMINARY SHORT STATEMENT EXPLAINING REASONS FOR this 'CLAIM' regarding

'NUCLEAR WAR CRIMES' IN-PROGRESS against U.S. and 'Coalition' targets in the nation of Italy and in City of Rome and in City of the Vatican, location of St. Peter's Basilica :

.1. Claimants say the truth is that the nation and people of Italy and Rome are innocent victims caught in the middle of the “war crossfire” between Nuclear Jihad Insurgents and U.S. and

Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants,” also known as “U.S. Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” who own large business properties on the soil of Italy and Rome ” that attract hostile, life-destroying

'NUCLEAR Landmine WAR CRIME' attacks currently in-progress as threatened by Nuclear

Jihad militias onto the soil of Italy and Rome against U.S. and Coalition Corporation Business targets. SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ;

SEE: http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm ;

SEE: http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ;

. . .2. The Nation of Italy is an “innocent third-party victim nation” that is not a “Coalition Nation” at war in the Nations of Iraq and Afghanistan against al Shura Nuclear Jihad Insurgents and is not a “Coalition Nation” at war against Western al Qaida Nuclear Jihad Insurgents led by Ussama bin

Ladin.

.3. The Nation of Italy is an “innocent third-party victim nation” that is in mortal danger of its life from Nuclear weapon attacks deployed by Western al Shura Nuclear Jihad Insurgents and

Western al Qaida Nuclear Jihad Insurgents led by Ussama bin Ladin against U.S. and Coalition target Defendants D#1 through D#17 on the soil of Italy and Rome .

SEE: Hiroshima Nuclear Bomb Damage Photos:

9 of 256 10 of 256 http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ; http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm ;

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition http://www.writesafe.com/storage8/CANCOPY_cvrAfAmp_MATT.pdf

SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ;

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais

.4. Claimants petition the government of Italy, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of the people and nation of Italy and Rome regarding these most dangerous and life destroying “Nuclear

War Crime” attack matters currently in progress within the nation of Italy as brought against said U.S. and 'Coalition' corporation business targets, Defendants D#1 through D#17 , in the

Nation of Italy and city of Rome to determine whatever action the Nation of Italy and Rome may take in the interests of justice regarding the most reasonable voluntary removal from the nation of Italy and Rome of Defendants D#1 through D#17 , “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” and to determine the most reasonable removal of similar Coalition Corporate Business target 'Nuclear

Crime' magnets away from the nation of Italy and city of Rome.

.5. For purposes of simplifying this Claim, Claimants MacKenzie and Menchaca primarily focus on three theaters of War: Iraq, Afghanistan, and Italy and focus on the Saint Peter's Church in the

Vatican, the holiest place of Christianity .

.6. The current “Nuclear War Crime” attack matters perpetrated against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear

Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” have the potential to motivate and inspire Nuclear Jihad terrorists, IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested

10 of 256 11 of 256

Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, to inflict collateral blast and radiological poison (Uranium / radium ores from "hot" mines that test in the range of

50-100 mR / hr) damage of said “Nuclear Landmine Crimes against Defendants D#1 through

D#17 , which will catastrophically destroy millions of people in Italy and Rome, Vatican and will permanently damage the nation of Italy.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; SEE: http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm ;

SEE: http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ;

A. Italy and the city of Rome are immediately recognizable as an an easy mark and easy victim posing no difficulty for Terrorists to contaminate with Nuclear Crime attacks delivering deadly, life- destroying, readily obtainable, radioactive Radium (Uranium / radium ores from "hot" mines that test in the range of 50-100 mR / hr) from the abandoned Uranium/Radium, mine-pits in the United States, France, Pakistan, Russia, Europe, and South Africa , to the American target hotels, and so forth, of , Italy and Rome by "one man Nuclear Isotope courier" and thereby destroying , Italy and Rome with longterm radioactive contaminants for centuries.

Terrorists could decide to Radiologically attack , Italy and Rome with nuclear mining wastes for several reasons related to retaliation against U.S. Corporations doing business in Italy and

Rome.

SEE: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VB2-4BKN19P-

1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&

_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=824f6ac3be8817d7bde137ff1198abf0

. . "Abandoned, 'open pit,' Uranium mines" ("hot" mines of Uranium / radium ores that test in the range of 50-100 mR / hr) are also located at the following "Nuclear Crime" attack launching locations: (1) "Abandoned" South Terras Mine with the "HOTTEST 31 % Uranium/

Radium ore" ever discovered, near St. Stephen in Cornwall, England, (2) "Abandoned"

11 of 256 12 of 256

Autunois in France's Massif Central, (3)"Abandoned" Oberpfalz in Bavaria, and (4) Billingen in

Sweden. More "Abandoned, 'open pit,' Uranium mines" with deadly Uranium / Radium ore deposits are found at (5)"Abandoned" Shinkolobwe Uranium deposits in Katanga, (6)

"Abandoned" Uranium pits in Congo-Kinshasa, (7) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Namibia, (8)

"Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Nigeria, (9) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Côte d'Ivoire, (10)

"Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Djibouti, (11) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Egypt, (12) in

Equatorial Guinea, (13) in Czech Republic, and (14) in Romania, also at (15) "Abandoned"

Uranium Pits in Port Radium, near Great Bear Lake, Canada , (16) Uranium in at Beira Province,

Portugal; (17) at Tyuya Muyun, Uzbekistan, and at (18) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Radium

Hill, Australia. Uranium in "Abandoned, 'open pit,' Uranium mines" with deadly Uranium /

Radium ore deposits ("Radium" is lethal if inhaled) are everywhere on the Colorado Plateau of

(19) Utah and (20) Colorado. SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_uranium_mines

. . "Abandoned" Uranium Pit "Lethal radioactive Uranium waste" is simply piled on the ground near most of these abandoned open pit mines as, for example, at the entrance of the unguarded Margnac open Pit Uranium mine in France; and, anyone can take it at anytime. It is like shoveling garden dirt into the back of an automobile . . . , very simple.

. . Uranium / Radium waste piles at abandoned open pit mines present a lethal hazard because of release of bone rotting radioactive dust and radioactive radon gas that could easily be inhaled by victims. Toxic Radium dust is nine million times more radioactive than Uranium and once inhaled into lungs is impossible to remove. Radiological dust shows as glowing white spots on X-Ray plates of the inside of victim's lungs and is always fatal over time.

SEE: http://www.wise-uranium.org/uwai.html , Margnac open Pit Uranium mine near Limoges,

France. Also SEE: http://apps.sipri.org/sipri/stafflist_disp.php ;

.7. Yet, these conditions can be easily solved and eliminated by the voluntary self-removal from

Italy and Rome of U.S. and Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 , who are at war and who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” and can be easily solved by voluntary self-

12 of 256 13 of 256 removal of similar Coalition Corporate Business targets from Italy and Rome by publicly selling their entire interest and ownership of said U.S. Corporations and Coalition Corporations to Saudi

Arabian investors, Banks, and to other non-Western buyers who are known not to be “Nuclear

Landmine” targets.

.8. These Nuclear Landmine War crime Claims and Conditions may also be supervised under art.15 of the Rome Statute and may be sent to: International Criminal Court, Information and

Evidence Unit, Office of the Prosecutor, Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The

Netherlands, or sent by email to [email protected] , or sent by facsimile to +31

70 515 8555.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ; http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm ;

.9. Claimants petition the government of Italy and Rome to consider these most important

“Nuclear War Crime attack matters in-progress against U.S. and Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation Combatants” and are 'Coalition

Corporation Combatants' doing business on the soil of Italy and Rome .

.10. Claimants petition the government of Italy and Rome to consider and determine if U.S. and

Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 may be charged as Crime “accessories” who are concealing “Nuclear War Crime attack matters” in progress on the soil of Italy and Rome and thereby aiding and abetting “Nuclear War Crime” attack matters in progress against the Nation and people of Italy and Rome as described, in part, in U.S. House Hearing 106-158, but said

Nuclear Crimes concealed by U.S. and Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 from the people and nation of Italy and City of Rome :

SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ;

13 of 256 14 of 256 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais

Also SEE: 'Classified' & Extensive U.S. House Hearings 106-158 describing 'War Crime' attack information, not publicly published.

.11. Claimants further petition the government of Italy and Rome to consider and investigate U.S. and Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 to determine if they are concealing information of threats related to “Nuclear War Crime attack matters” in progress against their business addresses on the soil of Italy and Rome as described in U.S. House Hearings 106-158.

SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ; http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais

Also SEE: 'Classified' Extensive U.S. House Hearings 106-158 describing 'War Crime' attack information, not publicly published.

.12. Claimants further petition the government of Italy and Rome to Gieger / Roentgen Count all the business property holdings of said U.S. and Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 to determine if there are “Nuclear War Crime” attack matters in progress against the Nation and people of Italy and Rome as described, in part, as described in U.S. House Hearing 106-158, but concealed by U.S. and Coalition Defendants D#1 through D#17 from the people and nation of

Italy and Rome .

.13. Claimants petition the government of Italy and Rome to submit this “Nuclear War Crime”

Complaint to the government of Italy and Rome regarding whatever issues the Executive

Branch of Italy and Rome believes are best determined by the the government of Italy and

City of Rome in these most important “Nuclear War Crime matters.”

.14. On information and belief, Claimants complain and claim against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” in the nations of Italy

14 of 256 15 of 256 and Rome and Iraq. Claimants also complain against IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida

Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura

Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad insurgents . . . who are often identified in Western media as Western “Terrorists” fighting the

United States primarily in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also fighting the United States and Coalition

Countries from other bases of operation in other countries. Claimants do not make damage

Claims against Interested Parties IP#18 , IP#19, and IP#20.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

15 of 256 16 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 2 . . . Defendants D#1 through D#17 owe multi-billion dollar damages to the people and nation of Italy and Rome

.15. Claimants say All Defendants D#1 through D#17 owe multi-billion dollar damages to the people and nation of Italy and Rome and owe multi-billion dollar damages to Claimants by reason of the facts and truths related to the following most important “Nuclear War Crime matters” indicating Nuclear Crime attacks may have occurred against the People and nation of Italy and

Rome. For example, The United States currently has in prison a "Nuclear Jihad Terrorist" from

Chicago, Illinois, named Jose Padilla, once accused of plotting with al Qaeda to blow up a radioactive

"dirty bomb." Padilla was undoubtedly working with other al Qaeda Radiological Militias in the United

States and elsewhere, numbering in the hundreds or thousands, who have not yet been identified or imprisoned.

A. What is most frightening about the combination of Nuclear Jihad Terrorists, such as Padilla, and said abandoned Uranium pit mines in Pakistan, Iran, South Africa, England, Europe, Canada,

Indonesia, and in the United States, is that Nuclear Jihad Terrorists are within short driving distance to unguarded and abandoned Uranium pit mines where they can load their vehicles with thousands of kilos of deadly Uranium/Radium, drive deadly Uranium/Radium to a nearby large city and commence to deliver said Uranium/Radium contamination by use of a variety of attack deployment means, including vehicle dispersal delivery, or explosives dispersal delivery, or aerial dispersal delivery. The entire action of obtaining Nuclear / Radiological Contamination from abandoned Uranium pit mines is

16 of 256 17 of 256 obviously simple to accomplish; yet, no government effort is being made to guard or seal abandoned

Uranium pit mines in any country where they exist. These abandoned Uranium pit mines should be under national military or U.N. guard until effectively sealed as unaccessible and monitored by satellite surveillance.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ;

http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm ;

.16. Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca (died in Iraq, 2006) and Uncle of Claimant #2 Cesar Menchaca, brother of PFC Kristian Menchaca, a soldier who did serve with the U.S Military Expeditionary Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, says that President George W. Bush has proclaimed many times in the news media that U.S Military Expeditionary Forces in Iraq and

Afghanistan are fighting against Western Insurgents who have possession of “Nuclear Weapons of

Mass Destruction” (“NWMD”) in in Iraq and Afghanistan and in other countries.

.17. These “Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction” (“NWMD”) include 'fissile' (Nuclear Fission

Explosion of the Hiroshima type) and 'non-fissile' (Radio Active Isotope Pollution non-explosion type) 'Stealth' Nuclear Landmines that can catastrophically destroy great numbers of human beings once deployed. In 1996, The United Nations International Court of Justice denounced deployment of these 'Stealth' Nuclear Landmines to attack any country as “War Crimes” against

Humanity.

.18. Jurisdiction: the government of Italy and Rome has jurisdiction of these Nuclear War

Crime matters for the following reasons.

.19. Prior to June 2006 and during June 2006, U.S. Army PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC

Thomas Tucker were involved in military operations in partnership with the Iraq offices of

Defendants D#1 through D#17 of Italy and Rome . Defendants D#1 through D#17 of Iraq, in

17 of 256 18 of 256 fact, are extensions of Defendants D#1 through D#17 of said U.S. Corporations in Italy and

Rome who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” in Iraq and are “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” in the nation of Italy and City of Rome who are also “Nuclear

Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” in the Western Nation of Iraq and in the Western Nation of

Italy and Rome .

.20. PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were involved in military operations in partnership in Iraq with the representatives of Defendants D#1 through D#17 who were and are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants' in both Iraq and Italy and Rome and were and are military strategic targets simultaneously in both Iraq and Italy and Rome while PFC

Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were assigned to protect Defendants D#1 through D#17 from Nuclear Landmine attack in Iraq and protect Defendants D#1 through D#17 in the nation of Italy and Rome during June 2006.

.21. As a consequence of these extensive conditions wherein Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants' in both Iraq and Italy and Rome , simultaneously, and Defendants D#1 through D#17 are also “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet'

Targets” in the Western Nation of Italy and Rome , then the Royal Executive and Courts of Italy and Rome have lawful jurisdiction over the issues of these Nuclear War Crime matters, under

Geneva Conventions, under Laws of Italy and Rome , and under Laws of the Holy Koran as

Defendants D#1 through D#17 are Nuclear Crime targets in Italy and Rome.

.22. Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca and Claimant #2 Cesar

Menchaca, brother of PFC Kristian Menchaca (killed in Iraq 2006), a soldier who served with the

U.S Army Expeditionary force in Iraq, have been victimized by Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine

Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” who are at war in Iraq and Italy and Rome against IP#18 Interested

Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested

Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear

18 of 256 19 of 256

Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, who torture-murdered Vasquez-Menchaca family member, PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker, U.S. Army soldiers, June 2006, in Yosifiya, Iraq in violation of the Geneva Conventions of 1949; and, said IP#18 Interested

Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested

Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear

Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, were inspired and motivated to torture murder PFC

Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker by insufficient, life slandering, life defaming

U.S. $50,000 rewards offered by U.S. Attorney General Gonzales and U.S. Attorney General

Mukaysey and thereby indirectly offered by U.S. Defendants D#1 through D#17 -- D#1

Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome;

D#3 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Llimited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 Italy and

Rome ; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank,; D#5 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips

Company , Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953 ,

Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#8 Defendant CITICORP,

Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant DU PONT , Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant JP Morgan Chase,

Italy and Rome; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler,

Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors, Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant Coca-Cola

Bottling, Italy and Rome; D#15 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#16

Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#17 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome -- who did not increase $50,000 'Death rewards' on behalf of the lives of PFC Kristian Vasquez

Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker. U.S. Attorney General Gonzales set $50,000 'Death rewards' by broadcasting $50,000 'Death rewards,' worldwide, during 16, 17, 18, and 19 June 2006 in broadcast media, that were corruptly and criminally low and unequal compared to the mega- million dollar life rewards the U.S. Defendants D#1 through D#17 affiliated with the U.S. government were offering to save the lives of IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear

Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear

19 of 256 20 of 256

Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . .,

Interested Parties. U.S. Defendants D#1 through D#17 could have offerred increased rewards as Plaintiffs did offer under U.S. Case H-08-60. However, U.S. Defendants D#1 through D#17 did not offer increased life rewards on behalf of the lives of PFC Kristian

Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker; and, both were barbarically tortured to death.

.23. All Defendants D#1 through D#17 are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” --

D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann

Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley

Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4

Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and

Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan

Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton

Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant

FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome;

D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and

Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16

Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); – participating in the U.S. led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and All said Defendants D#1 through

D#17 in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also participated in the

U.S. Reward process for Prisoners of war by donating money to Rewards for Justice, Washington,

20 of 256 21 of 256

D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927; [email protected]; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/ http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english

.24. However, All said Defendants D#1 through D#17 in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” affiliated with the United States military have denied equal multi Million dollar rewards for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, for the lives of PFC Kristian Vasquez

Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker, thereby informing their Western Captors that PFC Kristian

Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were not worth valuable monetary consideration and little money was offered to save their lives.

.25. All said Defendants D#1 through D#17 in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” were aware that U.S. proclaimed “$50,000 Rewards,” proclaimed by News Media were and are known to be “$50,000 Reward Torture-Death Sentences” for captured U.S. troops who have have been tortured to Death as a consequence of U.S. proclaimed “$50,000 Torture-

Death Rewards.

.26. Moreover, All said Defendants D#1 through D#17 withheld money to equalize rewards for captured U.S. Prisoners of War knowing that the few soldiers, Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC

Thomas Tucker, who had learned that Defendants D#1 through D#17 were targeted with Nuclear

Landmines in the Nation of Italy and Rome in early 2006, were Prisoners of D#18 Defendant 'al

Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, D#19 Defendant 'al Shura Nuclear

Jihad insurgents; therefore, all said Defendants D#1 through D#17 in their roles as “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” had reason to keep the life rewards low for Kristian Vasquez

Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker to immorally cause their deaths by withholding equalizing reward money alongside the United States Rewards; and, Defendants D#1 through D#17 watched while Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were barbarically tortured to death as a consequence of said insufficient “U.S. $50,000 Reward Torture-Death Sentences” in which All said

Defendants D#1 through D#17 participated in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

21 of 256 22 of 256

'Combatants.” SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ; http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm ;

.27. Defendants D#1 through D#17 cannot prove they ever offered any Reward Money beyond said “U.S. $50,000 Reward Torture-Death Sentences” on behalf of Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and

PFC Thomas Tucker during June 2006 in an effort to save their lives.

.28. Apparently, the deaths of Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were convenient in terms of the fact that when dead they could not testify regarding the fact that all said Defendants D#1 through D#17 in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” were identified by al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin and al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents as Nuclear Landmine targets in the nation of Italy and Rome and in several other countries where U.S. Corporations are Nuclear Landmine target magnets of

Nuclear Radiological terrorists like Jose Padilla of al Qaida.

.29. All said Defendants D#1 through D#17 in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” were informed of U.S. House Hearings 106-158 indicating that All said Defendants D#1 through D#17 in the nation of Italy and Rome were targets of nuclear Landmines; and, all said Defendants D#1 through D#17 never at any time informed the government of Italy and Rome that the Nation of Italy and Rome and its people were in mortal danger of catastrophic Nuclear Landmine and Radiological

Landmine attacks.

.30. Defendants D#1 through D#17, in their roles as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants,” perpetrated crimes in violation of Geneva Conventions, in violation of the laws of

Italy and Rome , and in violation of the Laws of The Holy Korean in Defendant D#1 through D#17 concealment of information indicating that All Defendants D#1 through D#17 were targets of

Nuclear Landmine attacks in Italy and Rome , nuclear attacks which could kill millions of Italy and

22 of 256 23 of 256

Rome people and damage the nation of Italy and Rome so severely that it could never recover.

.31. Claimants say that Radiological contamination from a concealed al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear

"Radiological" Nuclear landmine on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear

'Target Magnets' would be equivalent to the radiological contamination of a Russian RA115 or U.S.

MADM class Nuclear Landmine described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 and will inflict the same damage as the U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War

Two.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition

SEE: http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ;

SEE: http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm ;

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ;

SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ;

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons

SEE: http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm

.32. Said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” Defendants D#1 through D#17 , also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target Magnets” -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and

Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley

Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel

Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union

Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant

Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ;

D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome;

23 of 256 24 of 256

D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto

& truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13

Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron-

Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant Halliburton

(Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant

Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry) -- acted in the same role as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime

Targets” in three theaters of War: Iraq, Afghanistan and Italy and Rome .

.33. Yet, in each of these three theaters of War, All Defendants D#1 through D#17 -- D#1

Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and

Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann

Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley

Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4

Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and

Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan

Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton

Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant

FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome;

D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and

Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16

Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

24 of 256 25 of 256

-- “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime

'Magnet' Targets,” acted in different Scenarios while playing the same roles as “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets.”

.34. IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin

Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested

Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, acted in the same role as in said three theaters of War -- Iraq, Afghanistan and Italy and Rome -- against the U.S. government and against Private Business, non-government, Defendants D#1 through D#17 and against Coalition Corporations.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

25 of 256 26 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CHAPTER 3 . . . War against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets”

.35. However, in the nation of Italy and Rome , Interested Parties D#18 through D#20, al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin and al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents and al Jimaya are at war with only the Coalition Countries and are at war against the United States, and are at war against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” who own and operate privately owned business property in the nation of Italy and Rome where IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, have previously deployed 'explosives' to bomb- attack Western targets owned by U.S. or Coalition Corporations comprised mostly of Western persons who are known to generally be non-Western . .36. IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, have deployed previous explosive bomb attacks in the nation of Italy and Rome against Western targets owned by U.S. or Coalition Corporations such as Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets.” .37. IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin

Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested

Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties, are primarily at war against U.S. Corporation and Coalition targets .

.38. It is important to note that D#18 Defendant 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by

26 of 256 27 of 256

Ussama bin Ladin, and D#19 Defendant 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, and D#20 Defendant al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad insurgents, are at war with the United States and are at war with “U.S.

Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are “U.S.

Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet'

Targets.”

.39. Violations of Geneva Comnvention War Crimes, Laws of Italy and Rome , and laws of Koran: all Defendants D#1 through D#17 , “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan

Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by

(2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector

Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union

Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant

Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ;

D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome;

D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome

(auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome;

D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron-

Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant Halliburton

(Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant

Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry) -- conspired with each other to violate Geneva Conventions, violate laws of Italy and Rome , and violate laws of the

Holy Koran by concealing “Nuclear War Crime” information from the government of Italy and

27 of 256 28 of 256

Rome and concealing that Defendants D#1 through D#17 and Coalition Corporations and other entities conspired with each other to deliberately not inform the government of Italy and Rome that All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” were designated by Nuclear Jihadists for Nuclear

Landmine attack in the nation of Italy and Rome as indicated in U.S. House Hearing 106-158 and indicated by information collected by U.S. Army Intelligence during early 2006 as observed by

U.S. Army Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, but concealed from the knowledge of the Nation and people of Italy and Rome .

.40. Claimants say that the Nuclear contamination from a concealed al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear

Radiological Nuclear landmine on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear

'Target Magnets' would be equivalent to the radiological contamination of a "fissile" Russian RA115 or U.S. MADM Nuclear Landmine described in U.S. House hearing 106-158, but without fissile explosion, and will inflict the same Radiological damage as the U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War 2; but, said Radiological damage will remain lethal for longer periods of time.

.41. “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” are currently in violation of the Geneva

Conventions and laws of Italy and Rome and in violation of the laws of The Holy Koran, and did perpetrate and commit violations of the Laws of the Holy Koran when Defendants D#1 through

D#17 maintained control of each of said “Nuclear Crime conspiracies of silence” to violate Geneva

Conventions and violate laws of Italy and Rome and to violate the Laws of the Holy Koran and to violate laws under jurisdiction of the Rome Statute .15 of the International Criminal Court.

.42. At all times relevant hereto, “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,”, “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” have attempted and conspired to violate and, in fact, have violated the Crime provisions and Nuclear

Crime provisions of the Geneva Conventions and laws of Italy and Rome and did commit

28 of 256 29 of 256 violations of the Laws of the Holy Koran by concealing from the people and nation of Italy and

Rome that “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” are Nuclear Crime

'Magnet' Corporations that attract Nuclear crimes aimed at said “All Defendants D#1 through

D#17 ” as Nuclear Crime 'Magnet' Corporations inside the Nation of Italy and Rome that are objects of Terrorism Nuclear Crimes by reason of identification of Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” as United States Corporations doing business as “Nuclear Crime Magnets” in the country of Italy and Rome that would not otherwise be targets of Nuclear Landmine attacks if “All Defendants

D#1 through D#17 ” were NOT identified as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” said Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Targets 'Magnets.'”

.

.43. At all times relevant hereto, “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” well understood that they were “high priority” Nuclear Crime Target Magnets for Nuclear Jihad attack thereby increasing the liklihood of a Nuclear Crime attack against “All Defendants D#1 through

D#17 ,” “several-hundred-times-over” in a peaceful nation that would not normally be the target of a Nuclear crime attack.

.44. At all times relevant hereto “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” well understood that their Business Corporation presence in the Nation of Italy and Rome increased the likelihood of Nuclear Crime attacks to abnormally high levels against the nation of Italy and

Rome by several “Nuclear Jihad” Insurgent groups, Defendants D#18 through D#20” who viewed

“All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” as component parts of United States war- making machinery that was and currently is in operation in the Western countries of Iraq,

29 of 256 30 of 256

Afghanistan, and Italy and Rome .

.45. Under these conditions, “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” were and are on one side of the firing line while said “Nuclear Jihad” Insurgent groups, Defendants D#18 through D#20 ,” were and are on the other side of the firing line and the innocent people of Italy and Rome are caught as victims in the middle of the war between “All Defendants D#1 through

D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” and “Nuclear Jihad” Insurgent groups, wherein “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” never made any effort to assist the nation and people of Italy and Rome to avoid the Nuclear crime threats that “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets,” brought to the Nation of

Italy and Rome by their “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant'' presence as “Nuclear

Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Targets” on the soil of Italy and Rome . Claimants say that the

Radiological contamination from a concealed al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Radiological Nuclear landmine on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear 'Target Magnets' would be equivalent to the 20 kiloton Russian RA115 or U.S. MADM Nuclear Landmine described in U.S.

House hearing 106-158 and will inflict the same Radiological contamination damage as the U.S.

Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War 2.

.46. The corrupt presence on the soil of Italy and Rome of “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” while concealing the fact that they are “Nuclear Crime 'Magnet' Targets” is a violation of the laws of the Holy Koran and is punishable under the laws of the Holy Koran. Once it became known that the presence on Saudi Arabian soil of Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnets'” was a

Nuclear Crime 'Magnet' threat exposing Italy and Rome to increased Nuclear Crime danger, which

Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” could easily have notified to the Nation of Italy and Rome and

30 of 256 31 of 256 cooperated to eliminate said increased Nuclear Crime threat to the people and Nation of Italy and

Rome by very publicly selling all property owned by Defendants D#1 through D#17, “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnets'” to the highest non-Western bidders who would “NOT” be “U.S. Military Industrial Corporations known as a “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnets,'”and then Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” completely departing the Nation of Italy and Rome to wherever else they might relocate.

.47. However, Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnets,'” wrongfully did not behave in a moral and ethical manner as required under the laws of the Holy Koran.

.48. Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnets,'” behaved in an immoral and Nuclear

Crime life-threatening manner by not informing the Nation of Italy and Rome of said increased

Nuclear Crime threats to the Nation of Italy and Rome, which could come from concealed fissile or radiological Nuclear Landmines aimed and targeted against Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,”

“U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime

'Magnet' Targets,” by 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, and by 'al

Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents. Claimants say that the blast explosion from a concealed al-

Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Radiological Nuclear landmine on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at

U.S. Corporation Nuclear 'Target Magnets' would be Radiologically equivalent to the 20 kiloton

Russian RA115 or U.S. MADM Nuclear Landmine described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 and will inflict the same damage as the U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War Two.

.49. The ownership of Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnets,'” could be easily and publicly replaced by non-Western, non United States owners who are native-born Saudis from

31 of 256 32 of 256

Italy and Rome or easily replaced by other nationalities that are not perceived as undesirable in the nation of Italy and Rome and therefore not a Nuclear Crime target magnet.

.50. Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Target' enterprises” who did violate provisions of the

Geneva Conventions and laws of Italy and Rome and did commit violations of the Laws of the

Holy Koran by concealing Nuclear Crimes and nuclear Crime threats from the nation of Italy and

Rome and by conspiring to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of said Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” Said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnet' enterprises,” conspired as Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnet'” enterprises” through a pattern of concealment of their status as “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants.” And further, each of the aforesaid Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants,” have been and currently are parties to an unlawful agreement to conceal their identity also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target 'Magnet' enterprises.”

Each of the aforesaid Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” who are Nuclear Crime 'Magnet'

Corporation enterprises, pursuant to said agreement, has agreed, conspired, and attempted to commit Geneva Convention Nuclear War Crime violations and Nuclear Crime violations of the laws of Italy and Rome and commit violations of the Laws of the Holy Koran by concealing from the nation of Italy and Rome said criminal concealment threats, by concealing information that

Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” had been “identified” by Western Fundamentalist Groups for

Nuclear landmine attacks on the soil of Italy and Rome targeting the radiological radius of said

Nuclear Landmine weapons to destroy said U.S. Military Industrial Corporations inside the nation of Italy and Rome. SEE: Nuclear Landmine weapons of U.S. House Hearing 106-158

(SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ;

32 of 256 33 of 256 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais)

.51. Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” directly and indirectly, have been and currently are parties to an unlawful “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” agreement to conceal their identity, also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet' Target' enterprises,” concealed from the people and nation of Italy and Rome that proveably could lead to the nuclear crime deaths of millions of Saudi Arabian people who could likely become nuclear crime victims at any time 'al

Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, and anytime 'al Shura

Nuclear Jihad insurgents decide to deploy one of the several types of Radiological Nuclear

Landmines said 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents and 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents claim to have aimed at aimed at “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” that are “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Magnet Target' enterprises” on the soil of Italy and Rome.

.52. It was as part of these conspiracies that said “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” attempted, conspired, aided, abeted, and agreed to commit multiple acts of Geneva Convention Nuclear

Crime violations and Nuclear Crime violations of the laws of Italy and Rome and commit violations of the Laws of the Holy Koran by concealing from the nation of Italy and Rome said

Nuclear Crime acts that provably could lead to the nuclear crime deaths of millions of Saudi

Arabians the soil of Italy and Rome .

A. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” who, jointly and severally, conspired with each other as Nuclear Crime 'Magnet' Corporations and

“enterprises” to violate the Geneva Conventions and laws of Italy and Rome and did commit violations of the Laws of the Holy Koran in repeated “patterns of deception and concealing information of “Nuclear Crime” activity reported in U.S. House Hearing 106-158.

SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ;

33 of 256 34 of 256 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais

.53. And, “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” did violate and maintain control of each of said conspiracies to violate the Geneva Conventions and violations of the laws of Italy and Rome and did commit violations of the Laws of the Holy Koran in concealing mass murder attacks against innocent men, women, and children people of Italy and Rome .

(SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ; http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais)

.54. And, at all times relevant hereto, said “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” have attempted and conspired to violate the provisions of

Geneva Conventions and laws of Italy and Rome and did commit violations of the Laws of the

Holy Koran by conspiring to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of said “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” through a “pattern of violating the Geneva Conventions, violatiing the laws of Italy and Rome and violating the Laws of the Holy

Koran by concealing Nuclear Crime threats and concealing Nuclear Crimes against “Defendants

D#1 through D#17 ” in the nation of Italy and Rome, thereby wrongfully endangering the nation and people of Italy and Rome to the increased likelihood of Nuclear Crime attack .

.55. By reason of the foregoing, each of the aforesaid Defendants has been and currently is a party to an unlawful agreement, and each of the aforesaid Defendants, pursuant to said agreement, has apparently agreed to maintain silence and thereby commit two or more such predicate acts.

.56. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Target Magnet' Corporations have participated in these

Nuclear War Crime criminal acts of silence at all times.”

.57. Al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents understood that said U.S. $50,000 Death rewards offered by the U.S. government with support from “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” for captured U.S.

34 of 256 35 of 256 soldier Prisoners of War were slanders and defamations of U.S. Prisoner of War life values prohibited by the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977. CHAPTER 4. . .

.58. After U.S. Army Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker were captured in Yosifiya during 16 June 2006, by D#18 Defendant 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin

Ladin and D#19 Defendant 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, al Shura / al Qaida Insurgents in the Iraq War theater, U.S. Army Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker were ‘Bad Faith’ proclaimed as worth “$50,000 Rewards” by the U.S. government together with News media and, in ‘Bad Faith,’ were denied by “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” moral Reward life values of $25 million dollars equal to their enemies who are known to be the same Insurgent Defendants,

IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin,

IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al

Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties ..., Insurgent Defendants D#18 through D#20, who have indicated and proclaimed intent to Nuclear landmine attack “Defendants

D#1 through D#17 ,” in the nation of Italy and Rome.

.59. During June 2006, Insurgent Defendants IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear

Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear

Jihad insurgents, IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . .,

Interested Parties ..., Insurgent Defendants D#18 through D#20, were valued at one million dollar Reward Life Values to $25 Million Dollars by U.S. Attorney General Gonzales, which

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” in the nation of Italy and Rome did not enlarge.

.60. During June 2006, Reward Life Values of “equal life saving $25 Million Rewards” of United

States `Counter-terrorism Funds,' were bestowed on Terrorists in Iraq but were denied to Pfc.

Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker; and, as a consequence of such “omissions” and

35 of 256 36 of 256

“denials” by “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,”

Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker were mutilation-torture-murdered by al-Queda

& al-Shura Insurgents who tortured them to death during the three day period from 16 June to 19

June 2006. Said “Defendant Al-Queda & al-Shura Insurgents tortured Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and

Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker as shown in the enclosed video photos at the indicated Internet Web site addresses and as explained in the following:

(1) Al-Queda & al-Shura Insurgents smashed Pfc. Kristian Menchaca's and Pfc. Thomas

L. Tucker's faces to unrecognizable pulp while alive, (2) cut off their genitalia while

alive, (3) disemboweled & yanked-their-intestines-to-ground while alive, (4) amputated

their hands while alive, (5) tied Pfc. Kristian Menchaca's and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker's

arms and legs behind motor vehicles and set their bodies on fire with gasoline while

alive, (6) then dragged them behind motor vehicles while on fire and alive, (7) then

gouged out their eyes while alive, (8) then dragged them behind motor vehicles until

their arms and legs were torn from their bodies while alive, (9) then cut their heads off

and their hearts out in their last moments of life at the end of said three days of “long-

term” mutilation and torture.

SEE: Rewards for Justice, Washington, D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927;

[email protected]; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/

http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english

.61. During the time frame from 16 June 2006 to 19 June 2006, while Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker were deliberately defamed and slandered in their life values downward to U.S. $50,000 Death Rewards,” and denied equal $25 million Rewards by U.S.

Attorney General Gonzales and “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” in ‘Bad Faith’ of the Geneva

Conventions, and denied to equal life-saving treatment of said United States `Counter-terrorism

Funds' of Corporation provided money sourced at Rewards for Justice, Washington, D.C.20522-

36 of 256 37 of 256

0303, 1-800-877-3927, Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker were mutilation- torture-murdered as indicated, and “simultaneously, concurrently, and at the same time,” during this same time frame of June-2006, as said United States Code Title 1 money was paid out of the

U.S. Treasury and paid from Rewards for Justice, Washington, D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927, on behalf of said members of these same al Shura and al Queda Terrorist Organizations (with membership who were U.S.Reward-life-valued at multi-millions of dollars to $25 million), these same U.S.mega-million dollar Reward-life-valued al Shura and al Queda Terrorist Organizations were in-juxtaposition, “simultaneously, concurrently, and at the same time,” torture-murdering

(1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, who were “simultaneously, concurrently, and at the same time,” denied U.S. Attorney General Gonzales the same mega- million dollar Reward amounts bestowed by U.S. Attorney General Gonzales and were denied the same 25 mega-million dollar Reward amounts, unchallenged, by “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” in the nation of Italy and Rome , 25 mega-million dollar

Reward amounts bestowed by the U.S. on al Shura and al Queda Assassins of (1) Pfc. Kristian

Menchaca and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker.

.62. The deaths of (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker worked to maintain silence about the Nuclear Landmine shipments from Iraq to Italy and Rome claimed by 'al Qaida

Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin and 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents.

.63. Claimants, the family of Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, have been wrongfully thwarted and denied at every turn by the United States District Court system from filing a Geneva Convention

“CRIME TORT” lawsuit against the 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin and 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents who barbarically murdered PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC

Thomas Tucker in Yosifiya, Iraq, 2006; and Claimants, the family of Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, have been wrongfully thwarted and denied at every turn by the United States District Court system from filing a Geneva Convention “CRIME TORT” lawsuit against those in the U.S. Executive

37 of 256 38 of 256

Branch who, in violation of Geneva Conventions, contributed to defaming and slandering PFC

Kristian Menchaca's reward life value while he was most vulnerable as a disarmed Prisoner of War in Iraq.

. . . SEE: "U.S. Judge Gray Miller, accessory to Geneva Convention War Crimes against U.S.Troops," : http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/view.php?id=1047762 . . . SEE: Rewards for Justice, Washington , D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/ ; [email protected] ; .64. Claimants have been wrongfully and corruptly thwarted by U.S. Courts from filing a lawsuit against those who shared in the “Bad Faith” wrongdoings and errors associated with PFC Kristian

Menchaca's death.

.65. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear Landmine Crime 'Target Magnet' Corporations,” owe multi-billion dollar damages to the people and nation of Italy and Rome and owe at least 3 to 8 Billion dollars damages to the Kristian Vasquez Menchaca Family Claimants by reason of following facts:

.66. According to U.S. House Hearing 106-158 and U.S. Army interrogation records of U.S. Army interviews, early 2006, with captured 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents and 'al Shura Nuclear

Jihad insurgents, said “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” who are “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” are currently under threat or have been attacked with unexploded

Nuclear Landmine “Stealth” weapons in the nation of Italy and Rome that are not visible to the naked eye when concealed. And, “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” are threatened with imminent Nuclear Landmine War Crime annihilation explosions in violation of the laws of Italy and Rome and also in violation of the Geneva

Conventions of 1949, and in violation of the Geneva Protocols of 1977, and in violation of the

Laws of The Holy Koran and in violation of laws related to the International criminal Court Rome

Statute, Article .15, under which the International Criminal Court (ICC) operates.

.67. By reason of the fact that “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial

38 of 256 39 of 256

Corporation 'Combatants” are currently in violation of the laws of the Holy Koran, the government of Italy and Rome has jurisdiction of these War Crime matters and has further jurisdiction under those laws set forth in the Koran by Mohammed regarding treatment of “Prisoners of War.”

.68. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” are U.S.

Military Industrial Complex Corporations operating within the military interests and war-making capability of the government of the United States as U.S. war-machine component parts functioning in the nation of Italy and Rome and also operating as parts of the United States

Military machine in Iraq, where Defendants “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” supply motor vehicles and petroleum to U.S. Military forces fighting Western Fundamentalist Groups identified as 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' lead by Ussama bin

Ladin, and 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad.

.69. Western Fundamentalist Groups identified as 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' lead by Ussama bin

Ladin, and 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad. formerly lead by Abu al Masri (Masri reported as deceased) and led by Western Fundamentalist Groups known as al Jamiya, and lead by other Western

Fundamentalist Groups in the Nations of Iraq and Afghanistan have declared war against all U.S.

Corporation presence in all Western countries governed by the laws of the Koran and have therefore targeted U.S. Corporation owned property and Coalition-Corporation owned property for explosion-demolition attack to damage U.S. Military supplies facilitated through or originating in

Western countries, such as Italy and Rome , Egypt, Italy and Rome, and so forth, shipped to the

U.S. Expeditionary War efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

.70. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” are identified as “Nuclear attack” target magnets, which Western Fundamentalist Groups at war with the United States claim they will destroy as effectively as al Qaida destroyed the U.S. world Trade

Center in New York by reason of the fact that “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military

Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” provide petroleum and equipment to fuel the U.S.

Expeditionary Force at War against these same Nuclear Jihad Western Fundamentalist Groups in

39 of 256 40 of 256 the Nations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

.71. During U.S. Army 101st Airborne Division operations in Iraq of the year 2006, Pfc. Kristian

Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker were present as witnesses on several occassions when captured al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Jihad Terrorists informed their U.S. Army 101st Airborne

Division captors that several U.S. Corporations and Coalition Corporations including “Defendants

D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” were targeted for

“Nuclear attack” by Western Fundamentalist Groups who planned to conceal Nuclear landmine weapons on the soil of Italy and Rome while targeting the explosion blast and radiological radius of said Nuclear Landmine weapons to destroy said “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S.

Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” inside the nation of Italy and Rome.

SEE: Nuclear Landmine weapons of U.S. House Hearing 106-158: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais) http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ;

.72. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” are U.S.

Military Industrial Complex Corporations and are “target magnets” for concealed Nuclear landmine weapons and were most criminally wrongful in not notifying the government and people of Italy and Rome that Defendants are a “target magnet” for concealed Nuclear landmine weapons, which the United Nations International Court of Justice, during 1996, identified and condemned as a

“Nuclear Landmine War Crime” weapon and condemned deployment of said Nuclear Landmine weapons concealed in any country as a “War Crime.”

.73. Thus, the government of Italy and Rome has Geneva Convention jurisdiction of War Crime issues targeted against the Nation of Italy and Rome aided and abetted by “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” also known as “Nuclear

Landmine Crime 'Target Magnet' Corporations.”

.74. And, the U.N. International Criminal Court and the U.N. International Criminal Court have jurisdiction of these Nuclear Landmine “deployment” War Crime matters aimed against the Nation

40 of 256 41 of 256 of Italy and Rome .

.75. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” who are under threat with unexploded Nuclear Landmine “Stealth” weapons in the nation of Italy and Rome as alleged by said 'Al Qaida' and 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad Militia Groups who claim to have targeted radiological “Stealth” Nuclear Landmines aimed at “Defendants D#1 through D#17

” who are are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” and “Defendants D#1 through

D#17 ” claim to have targeted “Stealth” Nuclear landmines at the addresses other U.S. “Military

Industrial Complex Corporations” (see list at Appendix 2, herein) and said 'Al Qaida' and 'al Shura

Nuclear Jihad Militia Groups claim to have have targeted “Stealth” Nuclear landmines at Coalition

Corporations owning and operating bases of business on the soil of Italy and Rome . SEE:

Hiroshima Nuclear Bomb Damage Photos: http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ;

http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm

Also SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ; http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais

.76. On reasonable information and belief, Claimants allege that according to statements of captured Terrorist Insurgents to U.S. Army 101st. Airborne Military Intelligence, (1) unexploded

Nuclear Landmine “Stealth” weapons are offensively targeted at Saudi Arabian soil to “Nuclear

Crime” attack “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” and (2) unexploded Nuclear Landmine “Stealth” weapons are offensively targeted at

Saudi Arabian soil to “Nuclear Crime” attack other U.S. “Military Industrial Complex Corporations” and (3) unexploded Nuclear Landmine “Stealth” weapons are offensively targeted to “Nuclear

Crime” attack Coalition Corporations on Saudi Arabian soil.

SEE: U.S. House hearing 106-158: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ; http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?

41 of 256 42 of 256 dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais

.77. Claimants allege that if Nuclear Landmines are eventually exploded on Saudi Arabian soil, the “Nuclear Crime” blast and radiological damage will catastrophically destroy large areas of the nation of Italy and Rome and make them radiological Uranium wastelands too dangerous to support human life or support any life, whatsoever.

.78. The potentials for such horrifying “Nuclear Crime” damage do shock the human conscience beyond words to describe said “Nuclear Crimes.”

SEE: Hiroshima Nuclear Bomb Damage Photos: http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ; http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm

.79. There are several nuclear landmine types including fissile and radiological as described in

U.S. House Hearing 106-158 ( SEE: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ; http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais ) alleged by al Shura / al Qaida Terrorist

Insurgents as targeted at Saudi Arabian soil to “Nuclear Crime” attack “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” who are “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” and targeted at

Saudi Arabian soil to “Nuclear Crime” attack other U.S. “Military Industrial Complex

Corporations” doing business in the Nation of Italy and Rome and to “Nuclear Crime” attack

Coalition Corporations on Saudi Arabian soil that are members of the U.S. Military expeditions currently fighting wars against al Shura / al Qaida Terrorist Insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

.80. “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” and the government of the United States have behaved wrongfully by not forewarning the nation of Italy and Rome of the nuclear landmine attack information revealed in U.S. House Hearing 106-158 as said nuclear landmine information reveals Nuclear crime information that “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” and al-Shura / al-Qaida

42 of 256 43 of 256

Nuclear Jihad Terrorists have wrongfully concealed from the nation and people of Italy and Rome .

SEE: http://fas.org/irp/congress/2000_hr/hr_012400.htm ; http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=106_house_hearings&docid=f:66968.wais)

SEE:http://www.brook.edu/FP/projects/nucwcost/madm.htm http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama2.htm ;

http://titan.iwu.edu/~rwilson/hiroshima/rama3.htm

.81. The well-informed “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation

'Combatants” and, the government of the United States have behaved wrongfully by not forewarning the nation of Italy and Rome of planned and threatened nuclear landmine attacks against the nation of Italy and Rome described by captured al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Jihad

Terrorists who were interviewed by U.S. Army 101st Airborne Division captors during the first months of 2006 in the U.S. 101st Airborne Division areas of operation in Iraq.

.82. During May 2006, while home on “Military leave,” before he was later captured in Iraq, June

2006, by al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Jihad Terrorists and tortured to death, PFC Kristian

Menchaca explained to Claimant MacKenzie that PFC Kristian Menchaca was present at several

U.S. Army interrogations of captured al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Jihad Terrorists who claimed that al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Landmines had been “stealth” targeted inside the nation of Italy and

Rome and “stealth” concealed inside other foreign countries, including Europe, wherein al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Landmines had been “stealth” concealed targeting “U.S. Military Industrial

Complex Corporations” that have large multi-billion dollar business holdings inside several other foreign countries.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

43 of 256 44 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 5 . . .

Radiological landmines on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation

Nuclear 'Target Magnets' . . . equivalent to the 20 kiloton Russian RA115 . . . described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 . . . same Radiological damage as U.S.

Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War Two.

.83. Moreover, during May 2006, while home on Military “leave,” PFC Kristian Menchaca also explained to Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie (PFC Kristian Menchaca's Uncle relative) that PFC

Kristian Menchaca was present at several U.S. Army interrogations of captured Nuclear Jihad

Terrorists who claimed that al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Landmines had been also been targeted and / or concealed inside Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan against “U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants” , during years prior to early 2006. Claimants say that the Radiological

44 of 256 45 of 256 contamination from a concealed al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Radiological landmine on the soil of

Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear 'Target Magnets' would be equivalent to the 20 kiloton Russian RA115 or U.S. MADM Nuclear Landmine described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 and will inflict the same Radiological damage as the U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War Two.

.84. Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, was eyewitness to Kristian

Menchaca's testimony regarding Kristian Menchaca's explained presence at said interrogations of captured al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Jihad Terrorists by U.S. Army 101st Airborne Division captors during the early months of 2006, in the U.S. 101st Airborne Division areas of operation in Iraq during the early 2006 time frame.

.85. In fact, it was well publicized in the news media and in the internet that Abu al Masri, the al-

Shura Nuclear Jihad terrorist who tortured PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker to death, did call for a Nuclear Jihad in al Masri's subsequent news media videos to al Jazeera Middle

East News Media while celebrating the deaths of PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Muhajer : Abu Ayyub al-Masri, “also known as”:

“Abu Hamza al-Muhajir” Also SEE: http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ayyub_al-Masri

.86. Abu al Masri refered to Nuclear Radiological landmines that, when interviewed by U.S. Army

101st Airborne Division captors during the first months of 2006, al-Shura / al-Qaida Nuclear Jihad

Terrorists revealed had been targeted at U.S. “Military Industrial Complex Corporations” that have large multi-billion dollar business holdings in said foreign countries, such as Italy and Rome.

.87. WHEREFORE: In the interest of justice, in the interest of Claimants, and in the interest of discovering Nuclear Landmine attacks against “Defendants D#1 through D#17,” Claimants request

Royal Executive Decree that the government of Italy and Rome or Court make provision for a special counsel to address the issues of all included said violations of the Geneva conventions, The

Laws of Italy and Rome, and the Laws of The Holy Koran. Plaintiffs make no monetary or damage

45 of 256 46 of 256 claim for themselves against IP#18 Interested Partry 'al Qaida Nuclear Jihad' insurgents lead by Ussama bin Ladin, IP#19 Interested Partry 'al Shura Nuclear Jihad insurgents,

IP#20 Interested Partry al Jimaya Nuclear Jihad Insurgents . . ., Interested Parties

.88. Claimants request: a Royal Executive Decree or a Court Order that all the areas near All

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” properties in the nation of Italy and Rome be Roentgen or

Geiger counted daily for the presence of Nuclear Isotope Pollution to detect the presence of a radiological attack against all “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” and the results be reported in the news Media of Italy and Rome , costs of such Roentgen or Geiger count paid by all “Defendants

D#1 through D#17 ”

.89. Claimants request: an Executive Decree or a Court Order that all Saudi Arabian persons residing within the Radiological contamination range of several miles of any property owned by

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” be forewarned of the possibility of a nuclear attack against

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” and all said Saudi Arabian persons be assisted to move away from their residences to a safer area of Italy and Rome and the expenses of all said moves to a safer area be paid by “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” who must pay for an equivalent house structure equal to the fair market value of the house vacated by all all said Saudi Arabian persons assisted to move away from their residences to a safer area of Italy and Rome and further that

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” must pay all reasonable moving expenses to remove the furniture from the abandoned previous home to the new home and pay such other expenses deemed reasonable.

.90. Claimants request: an a Royal Executive Decree or Court Order that addresses the issues regarding U.S. troops in the Western Nation of Iraq making efforts to intercept Nuclear

Landmines in Iraq that are being shipped en route to attack “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,”

“U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants” in the nation of Italy and Rome that are a

“target magnet” for concealed Nuclear Landmine weapons being shipped from Iraq aboard ocean-

46 of 256 47 of 256 going ships or aircraft from Iraq to Italy and Rome, which Nuclear Landmine weapons, the United

Nations International Court of Justice, during 1996, identified as a “Nuclear Landmine War Crime” weapon and condemned deployment of said Nuclear Landmine weapons shipped to or concealed in any country as “War Crimes.” Said Executive Decree or Court Order provide a Reward and

Ransom fund of $10 billion U.S. dollars to offer Rewards and Ransoms for “captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War in Iraq” equal to said $25 million dollar Rewards and Ransoms advertised as a life saving reward value for Usama bin Ladin.

.91. Claimants request: an an Executive Decree or Court Order that requires “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” 'U.S. Military Industrial Private Corporation 'Combatants,' to pay rewards for recovery of stolen Russian RA115 Nuclear Landmines and other Nuclear Landmines aimed at

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 who are Private Corporations in the nation of Italy and Rome and in the nations of Iraq and Afghanistan; and, “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” pay rewards for recovery of stolen Russian RA115 Nuclear Landmines and pay for recovery of other Nuclear

Landmines aimed at “Defendants D#1 through D#17 that are negotiable at the “black market price of $250 million dollars for each structurally complete fissile Nuclear Landmine recovered essentially intact with its Nuclear core charge in place.

.92. Claimants request: an Executive Decree or Court Order that requires Defendants pay for efforts to intercept Nuclear Landmines sent from Iraq that are being shipped en route to attack

“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” operating large business properties in Italy and Rome , which are “target magnets” for concealed Nuclear

Landmine weapons being shipped from Iraq aboard ocean going ships or being flown aboard aircraft from Iraq to Italy and Rome. Deployment of said Nuclear Landmine weapons shipped to or concealed in any country was described by the United Nations International Court of Justice, during 1996, as “Nuclear Landmine War Crimes.”

.93. Claimants request: an Executive or Court order that “Defendants #1 through #17 post

47 of 256 48 of 256

Rewards of $25 Million for each U.S. soldier captured in Iraq and Afghanistan to supplement the insufficient United States proclaimed “Fifty-Thousand-Dollar ($50,000)Death-Sentence Rewards” against Terrorist-captured U.S. Soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan who are currently involved in combat operations protecting “Defendants #1 through #17 from Nuclear Landmine attack launched by al Shura Nuclear Jihad Militia snd al Qaida Nuclear Jihad Militia against “Defendant #1 through #17 business address properties inside the nation of Italy and Rome , which Nuclear

Crime attacks would catastrophically destroy the lives of millions of Saudi Arabian people and damage the nation of Italy and Rome . Said Executive Decree or Court Order would provide a

Reward and Ransom fund of $10 billion U.S. dollars paid by U.S. “Defendants D#1 through

D#17 ,” to offer increased Rewards and Ransoms for “captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War in

Iraq” to become Reward equal to captured terrorists, such as Ussama Bin Ladin, who is advertised at a U.S. publicized $25 Million 'life saving' reward. Insufficient “U.S. $50,000 Rewards,” manipulated by the U.S.“Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” who are“U.S. Military Industrial

Corporation 'Combatants,” do become “$50,000 Torture-Death Rewards,” widely known to be

“$50,000 Death sentence Rewards” of 500 times less life value than terrorist enemies of Italy and

Rome. A Reward and Ransom fund of $10 billion U.S. dollars to offer increased Rewards and

Ransoms for “captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War in Iraq will save lives of U.S. soldiers who are currently combating al Shura's and al Qaida's efforts to ship Nuclear Landmines to attack “U.S.

Defendants D#1 through D#17 ,” “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatants,” in the nation of Italy and Rome .

.94. Claimants request: a Royal Executive Order or Court order for a Reward and Ransom fund of $10 billion U.S. dollars to make available increased Rewards and Ransoms for “captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War in Iraq who are combating the al Shura / al Qaida deployment and shipping from Iraq of said 'Nuclear War Crime Landmine weapons' to the nation of Italy and

Rome to attack “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” in Vatican, Italy and Rome and to 'Nuclear

48 of 256 49 of 256

War Crime 'attack “Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” in other areas of Italy and Rome. The government of the United States, former U.S. Attorney General Gonzales and current U.S.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey, has treacherously refused to value and protect captured U.S.

Soldiers equal to the $25 million Dollar life value of Terrorists; and, because of said $25,000,000

Reward, all 100% of Terrorists valued at mega millions who have been captured in Iraq have survived capture to remain alive, while said captured U.S. $50,000 Dollar low-value U.S. Soldiers have been tortured to Death. Those captured U.S. soldiers who knew of the al Shura and al Qaida shipping of Radiological Landmines comprised of Uranium/Radium ore tailings from open pit

Uranium mines in Iran to Iraq to Italy and Rome to attack U.S. Defendants D#1 through D#17, in the nation of Italy and Rome were tortured to death when captured by al Qaida.

. . . A. Said U.S. proclaimed low life value, insufficient U.S. $50,000 Dollar Rewards, alongside

U.S. $25 million offered on behalf of Terrorists, do indicate that the U.S. government is operating a deliberate manipulation of low and insufficient Reward offers in the U.S. government expectation that by offering low Reward sums for “captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of

War in Iraq, somehow the Jihadist Insurgents will manage to kill “captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq because the rewards are so slanderously and shamefully low, insufficient, and unbalanced that said $50,000 Rewards are more death sentences than they are rewards. This is proven by the fact that all one hundred per cent of captured $50,000 U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq have been tortured to death and murdered by their Terrorist captors. These

'$50,000 death sentence rewards' were created and inflicted on captured $50,000 U.S. Soldier

Prisoners of War in Iraq by the U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, a War Criminal, and U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, another War Criminal, whose infliction of these '$50,000 death sentence rewards' appear to have been manipulated to silence captured $50,000 U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War who were informed of the U.S. Military

Intelligence that said Nuclear terrorists were transporting lethal Uranium/Radium ore tailings

49 of 256 50 of 256 from open pit Uranium mines in Iran to Iraq, thence to Italy and Rome .

.95. Claimants request: an Executive Order or Court order, in the interests of justice, that all causes of action and all issues in this Complaint be heard and tried in courts of Italy and Rome.

.96. Claimants request: an Executive Order or Court order retaining jurisdiction in the Nation of

Italy and Rome for purpose of assuring that defendants comply in all respects with the orders of the Italy and Rome government.

.97. Claimants request: a judgment, to be made and entered upon the conclusion of the trial of this action, declaring the rights of the parties.

.98. CLAIMANTS REQUEST MONETARY RELIEF: War Crime victim Claimants repeat and reallege each and every allegation contained in foregoing paragraphs as if set forth fully herein and further request monetary relief as follows:

.99. that the Italy and Rome Government take administrative action or Court action to award

War Crime victim Claimants #3, The People and Nation of Italy and Rome (listed as War

Crime victim Claimants ) against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , -- D#1 Defendant

Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3

"Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of

Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and

Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First

Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6

Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and

Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and

Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and

Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and

50 of 256 51 of 256

Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant

Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant

Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17

Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry) and each of them, each, and jointly and severally, the following (1.) Monetary relief, Wrongful and Criminal

“Nuclear Crime Death Threat” damages, general damages, and special damages in excess of

$1,000,000,000,000 U.S. dollars (One Trillion dollars, U.S.) suffered by Claimant #3, the Italy and Rome Government (listed as Claimant' War Crime victims), the exact amount to be proven at trial, plus interest thereon; (2.) For prejudgement interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and Attorney fees to the the Italy and Rome Government and to Claimant

Kenneth macKenzie and Claimant cesar Menchaca; (3.) For interest, cost, and disbursements of this action; (4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to the government of Italy and Rome and to

Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to Claimant

#1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to Claimant #2. Cesar Vasquez

Menchaca; and to Claimant #3, the government of Italy and Rome (listed as Claimant War

Crime victims) (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon;

.100. that the government of Italy and Rome take Royal administrative action or Court action to award War Crime victim Claimants #3, the Nation of of Italy and Rome (listed as War

Crime victim Claimants ) against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , -- D#1 Defendant

Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3

"Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of

Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt

51 of 256 52 of 256 collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and

Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; D#4 Defendant First

Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6

Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and

Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and

Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and

Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and

Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant

Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant

Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17

Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry), and each of them, each, and jointly and severally, the following : (1.) that until “All U.S. Defendants

D#1 through D#17 ” -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase

Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson,

Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of

Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New

York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant

JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant

Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11

Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto

& truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and

Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 ,

52 of 256 53 of 256

Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

D#16 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry) -- are able to VOLUNTARILY divest themselves of all interest and ownership of all their property in the nation of Italy and Rome within reasonable time to save the lives of millions of

Italy and Rome War Crime victim Claimants who could likely be mass-murdered by Nuclear War

Crime attacks as described herein, “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” immediately post

"Nuclear Crime liability insurance" or surety of $1,000,000,000,000 U.S. dollars (One Trillion dollars, U.S.) to cover (1) Monetary relief, Wrongful and Criminal “Nuclear Crime Death Threat” damages, general damages, and special damages in excess of $1,000,000,000,000 U.S. dollars

(One Trillion dollars, U.S.) that may be suffered by War Crime victim Claimants #3, the Nation of

Italy and Rome (listed as War Crime victim Claimants ), the exact amount to be proven at trial, plus interest thereon; (2.) For pre-judgment interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and award Attorney fees to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome and Attorney Fees to

War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and War Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca ;

(3.) For interest, cost, and disbursements of this action; (4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to the Attorneys of Italy and Rome and to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to War

Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to War Crime victim Claimant #1.

Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to War Crime victim Claimant #2 Cesar

Vasquez Menchaca; (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper;

(6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon;

.101. that in compensation for violations of the Geneva Conventions, violations of the laws of

Italy and Rome and violations of those laws set forth in the Koran by Mohamed regarding treatment of “Prisoners of War, the Court award to Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of

53 of 256 54 of 256

Kristian Menchaca, and award to Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez Menchaca against All Defendants

D#1 through D#17 -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase

Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson,

Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of

Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New

York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant

JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant

Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11

Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto

& truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and

Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 ,

Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry);

D#16 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry), Insurgent Defendants and each of them, each, and jointly and severally, the following:

(1.) Monetary relief, Wrongful death, general, and special damages in excess of $8,000,000,000,

(eight billion dollars, U.S.) suffered by Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian

Menchaca, and suffered by Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez Menchaca , the exact amount to be proven at trial, plus interest thereon; (2.) For pre-judgement interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and Attorney fees; (3.) For interests, cost, and disbursements of this action;

( 4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to theMinister of Justice of Italy and Rome and reasonable

Attorney's fees to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to War Crime victim

Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to War Crime victim Claimants #1. Kenneth

54 of 256 55 of 256

MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to War Crime victim Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez

Menchaca. (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon;

.102. that the Court award Plaintiffs against the Defendants and each of them, jointly and severally, the following:

(1.) Monetary relief, general, and special damages to include $10,000,000,000 (Ten Billion

Dollars) to be held in Private Enterprise Banks as reward funds. Said $10,000,000,000 (Ten Billion

Dollars) to be used exclusively for payment of “life-rewards” for return alive of captured U.S. soldiers at $25 million each, immediately offered over world news media, within hours on the day of capture, and paid within hours on the day of capture, without delay, until all war hostilities have ended, and special bank arrangements be made for rapid transfer of any and all reward amounts be made to speed transfer of $25 million dollar reward amounts to whichever country is designated as a destination for reward payments;(2.) For prejudgment interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and Attorney fees; (3.) For interests, cost, and disbursements of this action; ( 4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome and reasonable Attorney's fees to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to War

Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to War Crime victim

Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to War Crime victim

Claimant #2. Cesar Vasquez Menchaca. (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon;

Dated: 19 January 2009

Claimants’ type-printed-signature names are also submitted as Claimants’ authorization that their type-printed-signatures, herein, are intended by them to suffice the same as their hand-written

55 of 256 56 of 256 signature names on this document, should their hand-written names be inadvertently omitted by any one of them on this document, which is submitted electronically:

Claimant’s type-printed-signature name: Kenneth W. MacKenzie,

Claimant’s Electronic signature signed name: S/ Kenneth W. MacKenzie,

Claimant’s hand-signature signed name: S/Kenneth W. MacKenzie,

Claimant’s type-printed-signature name: Cesar Menchaca,

Claimant’s Electronic signature signed name: S/Cesar Menchaca

Claimant’s hand-signature signed name: S/Cesar Menchaca

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 6 . . . History of Holy St. Peters with photos of St. Peters inside courtyard of Vatican City buildings and basilica. St. Peter's Basilica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search St. Peter's Basilica Basilica Sancti Petri (Latin) Basilica di San Pietro in Vaticano (Italian)

56 of 256 57 of 256

The interior of St. Peter's Basilica by Giovanni Paolo Pannini

Basic information Location Vatican City 41°54′8″N 12°27′12″E/41.90222°N Geographic coordinates 12.45333°E/41.90222; 12.45333 Coordinates : 41°54′8″N 12°27′12″E/41.90222°N 12.45333°E/41.90222; 12.45333 Religious affiliation Roman Catholic Year consecrated 1626 Ecclesiastical status Major basilica Architectural description Donato Bramante

Antonio da Sangallo the Younger Michelangelo Architect(s) Vignola Giacomo della Porta Carlo Maderno Gianlorenzo Bernini

Architectural style Renaissance and Groundbreaking 1506 Year completed 1626 Specifications Capacity 60,000 + Length 730 feet (220 m) Width 500 feet (150 m) Width (nave) 151.5 feet (46.2 m)

57 of 256 58 of 256

Height (max) 452 feet (138 m) Dome dia. (outer) 137.7 feet (42.0 m) The Basilica of Saint Peter (Latin: Basilica Sancti Petri), officially known in Italian as the Basilica di San Pietro in Vaticano and commonly known as St. Peter's Basilica, is located within the Vatican City. St. Peter's has the largest interior of any Christian church in the world, holding 60,000 people.[1] It is regarded as one of the holiest Christian sites and has been described as "holding a unique position in the Christian world" and as "the greatest of all churches of Christendom". [2] [3] [4] In Catholic Tradition, it is the burial site of its namesake Saint Peter, who was one of the twelve apostles of Jesus and, according to Tradition, first of Rome and therefore first in the line of the papal succession. Catholic tradition holds that Saint Peter's tomb is below the altar of the basilica. For this reason, many , starting with the first ones, have been buried there. There has been a church on this site since the 4th century. Construction on the present basilica, over the old Constantinian basilica, began on April 18, 1506 and was completed on November 18, 1626.[5] St. Peter's is famous as a place of pilgrimage, for its liturgical functions and for its historical associations. It is associated with the papacy, with the Counter-reformation and with numerous artists, most significantly Michelangelo. As a work of architecture, it is regarded as the greatest building of its age.[6] Contrary to popular misconception, Saint Peter's is not a cathedral, as it is not the seat of a bishop. It is properly termed a basilica. Like all of the earliest churches in Rome,[7] it has the entrance to the east and the apse at the west end of the building.

St. Peter's Basilica from the River Tiber. The iconic dome dominates the skyline of Rome. The Basilica of St. Peter is one of four Major Basilicas of Rome, the others being the Basilica of St. John Lateran, and St. Paul outside the Walls. It is the most prominent building inside the Vatican City. Its dome is a dominant feature of the skyline of Rome. Probably the largest church in Christianity,[1] it covers an area of 2.3 hectares (5.7 acres) and has a capacity of over 60,000 people. One of the holiest sites of Christendom in the Catholic Tradition, it is traditionally the burial site of its namesake Saint Peter, who was one of the twelve apostles of Jesus and, according to Roman Catholic Tradition, also the first Bishop of , and later first Bishop of Rome, the first Pope. Although the New Testament does not mention Peter's presence or martyrdom in Rome, Catholic tradition holds that his tomb is below the baldachin and altar; for this reason, many Popes, starting with the first ones, have been buried there. Construction on the current basilica, over the old Constantinian

58 of 256 59 of 256 basilica, began on April 18, 1506. At length on November 18, 1626, Pope Urban VIII solemnly dedicated the church[5]. St Peter's Basilica is neither the Pope's seat nor first in rank among the Major Basilicas of Rome. This honour is held by the Pope's cathedral, the Basilica of St. John Lateran. However, it is most certainly the Pope's principal church, as most Papal ceremonies take place at St. Peter's due to its size, proximity to the Papal residence, and location within the Vatican City walls. In the apse of the basilica is Bernini's monument enclosing the "Chair of Saint Peter" or , sometimes presumed to have been used by Saint Peter himself, but which was a gift from Charles the Bald and used by various popes.[8]

[edit] History

[edit] Burial site of St. Peter Main article: Saint Peter's tomb After the crucifixion of Jesus in the second quarter of the 1st century AD, it is recorded in the Biblical book of the Acts of the Apostles that one of his twelve disciples, Simon known as Peter, a fisherman from Galilee, took a leadership position among Jesus' followers and was of great importance in the founding of the Christian Church. The name Peter is "Petrus" in Latin and "Petros" in Greek, deriving from "petra" which means "stone" or "rock" in Greek. It is believed by a long tradition that Peter, after a ministry of about thirty years, traveled to Rome and met his martyrdom there. According to the traditional story, Peter was executed in the year 64 AD during the reign of the Roman Emperor Nero. His execution was one of the many martyrdoms of Christians following the Great Fire of Rome. He was said to have been crucified head downwards, by his own request, near the obelisk in the Circus of Nero. This obelisk now stands in Saint Peter's Square and is revered as a "witness" to Peter's death. It is one of several ancient Obelisks of Rome. The traditional story goes on to say that Peter's remains were buried just outside the Circus, on the Mons Vaticanus across the Via Cornelia from the Circus, less than 150 metres (490 ft) from his place of death. The Via Cornelia (which may have been known by another name to the ancient Romans) was a road which ran east-to-west along the north wall of the Circus on land now covered by the southern portions of the Basilica and Saint Peter's Square. Peter's grave was initially marked simply by a red rock, symbolic of his name, but meaningless to non-Christians. A shrine was built on this site some years later. Almost three hundred years later, Old Saint Peter's Basilica was constructed over this site. It is possible that the exact location of Peter's grave was known with certainty by Christians throughout all this time and that therefore the traditional location of Saint Peter's tomb is, in fact, its true location. On December 23, 1950, in his pre-Christmas radio broadcast to the world, Pope Pius XII announced the discovery of Saint Peter's tomb.[9] This was the culmination of 10 years of archaeological research under the crypt of the basilica, an area inaccessible since the 9th century. The burial place appears to have been an underground vault, with a structure above it believed to have been built by Pope Anacletus in the 1st century. Human remains were discovered, but it could not be determined if they were, in fact, the bones of the Apostle Peter. Indeed, the area now covered by the Vatican City had been a cemetery for some years before the Circus of Nero was built. It was a burial ground for the numerous

59 of 256 60 of 256 executions in the Circus and for many years after the burial of Saint Peter many Christians chose to be buried near him. It is likely that any excavation anywhere on the Vatican grounds would discover human remains.

A conjectural view of the Old Saint Peter's Basilica by H. W. Brewer, 1891

[edit] Old St. Peter's Main article: Old Saint Peter's Basilica Old St. Peter's Basilica was the fourth-century church begun by the Emperor Constantine between 326 and 333 AD. It was of typical basilical Latin Cross form with an apsidal end at the chancel, a wide nave and two aisles on either side. It was over 103.6 metres (340 ft) long, and the entrance was preceded by a large colonnaded atrium. This church had been built over the small shrine believed to mark the burial place of St. Peter. It contained a very large number of burials and memorials, including those of most of the popes from St. Peter to the 15th century. Since the construction of the current basilica, the name Old St. Peter's Basilica has been used for its predecessor to distinguish the two buildings.[10]

[edit] The plan to rebuild By the end of the 15th century, having been neglected during the period of the Avignon Papacy, the old basilica was in bad repair. It appears that the first pope to consider rebuilding, or at least making radical changes was Pope Nicholas V (1447–55). He commissioned work on the old building from Leone Battista Alberti and Bernardo Rossellino and also got Rossellino to design a plan for an entirely new basilica, or an extreme modification of the old. His reign was frustrated by political problems and when he died, little had been achieved. [11] He had, however, had 2,522 cartloads of stone transported from the Roman Colosseum.[12] In 1505, Pope Julius II, failing to heed warnings that the death of Nicholas V was an omen to those who might interfere with St Peter's, in order to glorify Rome and also undoubtedly for his own self- aggrandizement,[6] made a decision to demolish the ancient building and replace it with something grander. A competition was held, and a number of the designs have survived at the Uffizi Gallery. A succession of popes and architects followed in the next 120 years, their combined efforts resulting in the present building. The scheme begun by Julius II continued through the reigns of Leo X (1513– 1521), Hadrian VI (1522–1523). Clement VII (1523–1534), Paul III (1534–1549), Julius III (1550– 1555), Marcellus II (1555), Paul IV (1555–1559), Pius IV (1559–1565), Pius V (saint) (1565–1572), Gregory XIII (1572–1585), Sixtus V (1585–1590), Urban VII (1590), Gregory XIV (1590–1591),

60 of 256 61 of 256

Innocent IX (1591), Clement VIII(1592–1605), Leo XI (1605), Paul V (1605–1621), Gregory XV (1621–1623), Urban VIII (1623–1644) and Innocent X (1644–1655).

[edit] Architecture

[edit] Successive plans

Bramante's plan

Raphael's plan

61 of 256 62 of 256

Michelangelo's plan, extended with Maderna's nave and facade Pope Julius' scheme for the grandest building in Christendom[6] was the subject of a competition for which a number of entries remain intact in the Uffizi Gallery, Florence. It was the design of Donato Bramante that was selected, and for which the foundation stone was laid in 1506. This plan was in the form of an enormous Greek Cross with a dome inspired by that of the huge circular Roman temple, the Pantheon.[6] The main difference between Bramante's design and that of the Pantheon is that where the dome of the Pantheon is supported by a continuous wall, that of the new basilica was to be supported only on four large piers. This feature was maintained in the ultimate design. Bramante's dome was to be surmounted by a lantern with its own small dome but otherwise very similar in form to the Early Renaissance lantern of Florence Cathedral designed for Brunelleschi's dome by Michelozzo.[13] Bramante had envisioned that the central dome be surrounded by four lower domes at the diagonal axes. The equal chancel, nave and transept arms were each to be of two bays ending in an apse. At each corner of the building was to stand a tower, so that the overall plan was square, with the apses projecting at the cardinal points. Each apse had two large radial buttresses, which squared off its semi- circular shape.[14] When Pope Julius died in 1513, Bramante was replaced with Giuliano da Sangallo, Fra Giocondo and Raphael. Sangallo and Fra Giocondo both died in 1515, Bramante himself having died the previous year. The main change in Raphael's plan is the nave of five bays, with a row of complex apsidal chapels off the aisles on either side. Raphael's plan for the chancel and transepts made the squareness of the exterior walls more definite by reducing the size of the towers, and the semi-circular apses more clearly defined by encircling each with an ambulatory.[15] In 1520 Raphael also died, aged 37, and his successor Baldassare Peruzzi maintained changes that Raphael had proposed to the internal arrangement of the three main apses, but otherwise reverted to the Greek Cross plan and other features of Bramante.[16] This plan did not go ahead because of various difficulties of both church and state. In 1527 Rome was sacked and plundered by Emperor Charles V. Peruzzi died in 1536 without his plan being realised.[6] At this point Antonio da Sangallo the Younger submitted a plan which combines features of Peruzzi, Raphael and Bramante in its design and extends the building into a short nave with a wide façade and portico of dynamic projection. His proposal for the dome was much more elaborate of both structure and decoration than that of Bramante and included ribs on the exterior. Like Bramante, Sangallo

62 of 256 63 of 256 proposed that the dome be surmounted by a lantern which he redesigned to a larger and much more elaborate form.[17] Sangallo's main practical contribution was to strengthen Bramante's piers which had begun to crack.[11] On January 1, 1547 in the reign of Pope Paul III, Michelangelo, then in his seventies, succeeded Sangallo the Younger as "Capomaestro", the superintendent of the building program at St Peter's.[18] He is to be regarded as the principal designer of a large part of the building as it stands today, and as bringing the construction to a point where it could be carried through. He did not take on the job with pleasure; it was forced upon him by Pope Paul, frustrated at the death of his chosen candidate, Giulio Romano and the refusal of Jacopo Sansovino to leave Venice. Michelangelo wrote "I undertake this only for the love of God and in honour of the Apostle." He insisted that he should be given a free hand to achieve the ultimate aim by whatever means he saw fit.[11]

[edit] Michelangelo's contribution Michelangelo took over a building site at which four piers, enormous beyond any constructed since the days of Ancient Rome, were rising behind the remaining nave of the old basilica. He also inherited the numerous schemes designed and redesigned by some of the greatest architectural and engineering brains of the 16th century. There were certain common elements in these schemes. They all called for a dome to equal that engineered by Brunelleschi a century earlier and which has since dominated the skyline of Renaissance Florence, and they all called for a strongly symmetrical plan of either Greek Cross form, like the iconic St. Mark's Basilica in Venice, or of a Latin Cross with the transepts of identical form to the chancel as at Florence Cathedral. Even though the work had progressed only a little in 40 years, Michelangelo did not simply dismiss the ideas of the previous architects. He drew on them in developing a grand vision. Above all, Michelangelo recognized the essential quality of Bramante's original design. He reverted to the Greek Cross and, as Helen Gardner expresses it: "Without destroying the centralising features of Bramante's plan, Michelangelo, with a few strokes of the pen converted its snowflake complexity into massive, cohesive unity."[19] As it stands today, St. Peter's has been extended with a nave by Carlo Maderno. It is the chancel end (the ecclesiastical "Eastern end") with its huge centrally placed dome that is the work of Michelangelo. Because of its location within the Vatican State and because the projection of the nave screens the dome from sight when the building is approached from the square in front of it, the work of Michelangelo is best appreciated from a distance. What becomes apparent is that the architect has greatly reduced the clearly defined geometric forms of Bramante's plan of a square with square projections, and also of Raphael's plan of a square with semi-circular projections.[20] Michelangelo has blurred the definition of the geometry by making the external masonry of massive proportions and filling in every corner with a small vestry or stairwell. The effect created is of a continuous wall-surface that is folded or fractured at different angles, but lacks the right-angles which usually define change of direction at the corners of a building. This exterior is surrounded by a giant order of Corinthian pilasters all set at slightly different angles to each other, in keeping with the ever-changing angles of the wall's surface. Above them the huge cornice ripples in a continuous band, giving the appearance of keeping the whole building in a state of compression.[21]

63 of 256 64 of 256

[edit] Dome - successive designs and final solution

Bramante's dome The dome of St. Peter's rises to a total height of 136.57 metres (448.1 ft) from the floor of the basilica to the top of the external cross. It is the tallest dome in the world.[22] Its internal diameter is 41.47 metres (136.1 ft), being just slightly smaller than two of the three other huge domes that preceded it, those of the Pantheon of Ancient Rome and Florence Cathedral of the Early Renaissance. It has a greater diameter by approximately 30 feet (9.1 m) than that of the third great dome, Constantinople's Hagia Sophia church, completed in 537. It was to the domes of the Pantheon and Florence duomo that the architects of St. Peter's looked for solutions as to how to go about building what was conceived, from the outset, as the greatest dome of Christendom.

[edit] Bramante and Sangallo, 1506 and 1513 The dome of the Pantheon, 43.3 metres (142 ft), (the widest dome in the world until the 19th century), stands on a circular wall with no entrances or windows except a single door. The whole building is as high as it is wide. Its dome is constructed in a single shell of concrete, made light by the inclusion of a large amount of the volcanic stones tufa and pumice. The inner surface of the dome is deeply coffered which has the effect of creating both vertical and horizontal ribs, while lightening the overall load. At the summit is an ocular opening 8 metres (26 ft) across which provides light to the interior.[6] Bramante's plan for the dome of St. Peter's (1506) follows that of the Pantheon very closely, and like that of the Pantheon, was designed to be constructed in tufa concrete for which he had rediscovered a formula. With the exception of the lantern that surmounts it, the profile is very similar, except that in this case the supporting wall becomes a drum raised high above ground level on four massive piers. The solid wall, as used at the Pantheon, is lightened at St. Peter's by Bramante piercing it with windows and encircling it with a peristyle.

64 of 256 65 of 256

Sangallo's design In the case of Florence Cathedral, the desired visual appearance of the pointed dome existed for many years before Brunelleschi made its construction feasible.[23] Its double-shell construction of bricks locked together in herringbone pattern (re-introduced from Byzantine architecture), and the gentle upward slope of its eight stone ribs made it possible for the construction to take place without the massive wooden formwork necessary to construct hemispherical arches. While its appearance, with the exception of the details of the lantern, is entirely Gothic, its engineering was highly innovative, and the product of a mind that had studied the huge vaults and remaining dome of Ancient Rome.[13] Sangallo's plan (1513), of which a large wooden model still exists, looks to both these predecessors. He realised the value of both the coffering at the Pantheon and the outer stone ribs at Florence Cathedral. He strengthened and extended the peristyle of Bramante into a series of arched and ordered openings around the base, with a second such arcade set back in a tier above the first. In his hands, the rather delicate form of the lantern, based closely on that in Florence, became a massive structure, surrounded by a projecting base, a peristyle and surmounted by a spire of conic form.[24] According to James Lees-Milne the design was "too eclectic, too pernickety and too tasteless to have been a success".[11]

[edit] Michelangelo and Giacomo della Porta, 1547 and 1585

St. Peter's Basilica from Castel Sant'Angelo showing the dome rising behind Maderna's facade Michelangelo redesigned the dome in 1547, taking into account all that had gone before. His dome, like that of Florence, is constructed of two shells of brick, the outer one having 16 stone ribs, twice the

65 of 256 66 of 256 number at Florence but far fewer than in Sangallo's design. As with the designs of Bramante and Sangallo, the dome is raised from the piers on a drum. The encircling peristyle of Bramante and the arcade of Sangallo are reduced to 16 pairs of Corinthian columns, each of 15 metres (49 ft) high which stand proud of the building, connected by an arch. Visually they appear to buttress each of the ribs, but structurally they are probably quite redundant. The reason for this is that the dome is ovoid in shape, rising steeply as does the dome of Florence Cathedral, and therefore exerting less outward thrust than does a hemispherical dome, such as that of the Pantheon, which, although it is not buttressed, is countered by the downward thrust of heavy masonry which extends above the circling wall. [6] [11] The ovoid profile of the dome has been the subject of much speculation and scholarship over the past century. Michelangelo died in 1564, leaving the drum of the dome complete, and Bramante's piers much bulkier than originally designed, each 18 metres (59 ft) across. On his death the work continued under his assistant Vignola with Giorgio Vasari appointed by Pope Pius V as a watchdog to make sure that Michelangelo's plans were carried out exactly. Despite Vignola's knowledge of Michelangelo's intentions, little happened in this period. In 1585 the energetic Pope Sixtus appointed Giacomo della Porta who was to be assisted by Domenico Fontana. The five year reign of Sixtus was to see the building advance at a great rate.[11]

The engraving by Stefan du Pérac was published in 1569, five years after the death of Michelangelo. Michelangelo left a few drawings, including an early drawing of the dome, and some drawings of details. There were also detailed engravings published in 1569 by Stefan du Pérac who claimed that they were the master's final solution. Michelangelo, like Sangallo before him, also left a large wooden model. Giacomo della Porta subsequently altered this model in several ways, in keeping with changes that he made to the design. Most of these changes were of a cosmetic nature, such as the adding of lion's masks over the swags on the drum in honour of Pope Sixtus and adding a circlet of finials around the spire at the top of the lantern, as proposed by Sangallo. The major change that was made to the model, either by della Porta, or Michelangelo himself before his death, was to raise the outer dome higher above the inner one.[11] A drawing by Michelangelo indicates that his early intentions were towards an ovoid dome, rather than a hemispherical one.[19] Stefan du Pérac's engraving shows a hemispherical dome, but this was perhaps an inaccuracy of the engraver. The profile of the wooden model is more ovoid than that of the engraving, but less so than the finished product. It has been suggested that Michelangelo on his death bed reverted to the more pointed shape. However Lees-Milne cites Giacomo della Porta as taking full

66 of 256 67 of 256 responsibility for the change and as indicating to Pope Sixtus that Michelangelo was lacking in the scientific understanding of which he himself was capable.[11] Helen Gardner suggests that Michelangelo made the change to the hemispherical dome of lower profile in order to establish a balance between the dynamic vertical elements of the encircling giant order of pilasters and a more static and reposeful dome. Gardner also comments "The sculpturing of architecture [by Michelangelo]... here extends itself up from the ground through the attic stories and moves on into the drum and dome, the whole building being pulled together into a unity from base to summit."[19] It is this sense of the building being sculptured, unified and "pulled together" by the encircling band of the deep cornice that led Eneide Mignacca to conclude that the ovoid profile, seen now in the end product, was an essential part of Michelangelo's first (and last) concept. The sculptor/architect has, figuratively speaking, taken all the previous designs in hand and compressed their contours as if the building were a lump of clay. The dome must appear to thrust upwards because of the apparent pressure created by flattening the building's angles and restraining its projections.[21] If this explanation is the correct one, then the profile of the dome is not merely a structural solution, as perceived by Giacomo della Porta; it is part of the integrated design solution that is about visual tension and compression. In one sense, Michelangelo's dome may appear to look backward to the Gothic profile of Florence Cathedral and ignore the Classicism of the Renaissance, but on the other hand, perhaps more than any other building of the 1500s, it prefigures the architecture of the Baroque.[21]

[edit] Completion

The dome was brought to completion by Giacomo della Porta and Fontana. Giacomo della Porta and Fontana brought the dome to completion in 1590, the last year of the reign of Sixtus V. His successor, Gregory XIV, saw Fontana complete the lantern and had an inscription to the honour of Sixtus V placed around its inner opening. The next pope, Clement VIII, had the cross raised into place, an event which took all day, and was accompanied by the ringing of the bells of all the city's churches. In the arms of the cross are set two lead caskets, one containing a fragment of the True Cross and a of St. Andrew and the other containing medallions of the Holy Lamb.[11] In the mid-18th century, cracks appeared in the dome, so four iron chains were installed between the two shells to bind it, like the rings that keep a barrel from bursting. As many as ten chains have been installed at various times, the earliest possibly planned by Michelangelo himself as a precaution, as Brunelleschi did at Florence Cathedral.

67 of 256 68 of 256

Around the inside of the dome is written, in letters 2 metres (6.6 ft) high: Tv es Petrvs et svper hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam. Tibi dabo claves regni caelorvm ("...you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church. ... I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven..." Vulgate, Matthew 16:18–19.)

Beneath the lantern is the inscription: S. Petri gloriae sixtvs pp. v. a. m. d. xc. pontif. V. (To the glory of St Peter; Sixtus V, pope, in the year 1590 and the fifth year of his pontificate.)

[edit] Discovery of Michelangelo draft On December 7, 2007, a fragment of a red chalk drawing of a section of the dome of Saint Peter's, almost certainly by the hand of Michelangelo was discovered in the Vatican archives.[25] The drawing shows a small precisely drafted section of the plan of the entabulature above two of the radial columns of the cupola drum. Michelangelo is known to have destroyed thousands of his drawings before his death.[26] The rare survival of this example is probably due to its fragmentary state and the fact that detailed mathematical calculations had been made over the top of the drawing. [25]

The nave looking towards the entrance

[edit] The change of plan On the first day of Lent, February 18, 1606, under Pope Paul V, the demolition of the remaining parts of the Constantinian basilica began. The marble cross set at the top of the pediment by Pope Sylvester and the Emperor Constantine was lowered to the ground. The timbers were salvaged for the roof of the Borghese Palace and two rare black marble columns, the largest of their kind, were carefully stored and later used in the narthex. The tombs of various popes were opened, treasures removed and plans made for reinterment in the new basilica.[11] The Pope had appointed Carlo Maderno in 1602. He was a nephew of Domenico Fontana and had

68 of 256 69 of 256 demonstrated himself as a dynamic architect. Maderno's idea was to ring Michelangelo's building with chapels, but the Pope was hesitant about deviating from the master's plan, even though he had been dead for forty years. The Fabbrica or building committee, a group drawn from various nationalities and generally despised by the Curia who viewed the basilica as belonging to Rome rather than Christendom, were in a quandary as to how the building should proceed. One of the matters that influenced their thinking was the Counter-Reformation which increasingly associated a Greek Cross plan with paganism and saw the Latin Cross as truly symbolic of Christianity.[11] Another influence on the thinking of both the Fabbrica and the Curia was a certain guilt at the demolition of the ancient building. The ground on which it and its various associated chapels, vestries and sacristies had stood for so long was hallowed. The only solution was to build a nave that encompassed the whole space. In 1607 a committee of ten architects was called together, and a decision was made to extend Michelangelo's building into a nave. Maderno's plans for both the nave and the façade were accepted. The building began on May 7, 1607, and proceeded at a great rate, with an army of 700 labourers being employed. The following year, the façade was begun, in December 1614 the final touches were added to the stucco decoration of the vault and early in 1615 the partition wall between the two sections was pulled down. All the rubble was carted away, and the nave was ready for use by Palm Sunday.[11]

[edit] Maderno's façade

Maderno's facade The façade designed by Maderno, is 114.69 metres (376.3 ft) wide and 45.55 metres (149.4 ft) high and is built of travertine stone, with a giant order of Corinthian columns and a central pediment rising in front of a tall attic surmounted by statues of Christ, John the Baptist, and eleven of the apostles. The inscription on the facade reads: “ IN HONOREM PRINCIPIS APOST PAVLVS V BVRGHESIVS ROMANVS PONT MAX AN MDCXII PONT VII ” (Paul V Borghese, Roman, Pontiff, in the year 1612, the seventh of his pontificate, erected in honor of the Prince of Apostles) The façade is often cited as the least satisfactory part of the design of St. Peter's. The reasons for this, according to James Lees-Milne, are that it was not given enough consideration by the Pope and committee because of the desire to get the building completed quickly, coupled with the fact that Maderno was hesitant to deviate from the pattern set by Michelangelo at the other end of the building.

69 of 256 70 of 256

Lees-Milne describes the problems of the façade as being too broad for its height, too cramped in its details and too heavy in the attic storey. The breadth is caused by modifying the plan to have towers on either side. These towers were never executed above the line of the facade because it was discovered that the ground was not sufficiently stable to bear the weight. One effect of the façade and lengthened nave is to screen the view of the dome, so that the building, from the front, has no vertical feature, except from a distance.[11]

The narthex

[edit] Narthex and portals Behind the façade of St. Peter's stretches a long portico or "narthex" such as was occasionally found in Italian Romanesque churches. This is the part of Maderno's design with which he was most satisfied. Its long barrel vault is decorated with ornate stucco and gilt, and successfully illuminated by small windows between pendentives, while the ornate marble floor is beamed with light reflected in from the piazza. At each end of the narthex is a rather theatrical space framed by ionic columns in each of which is set and equestrian figure, Charlemagne by Cornacchini (18th century) to the south and Emperor Constantine by Bernini (1670) to the north. Five portals, of which three are framed by huge salvaged antique columns, lead into the basilica. The central portals has a bronze door created by Antonio Averulino in 1455 for the old basilica and somewhat enlarged to fit the new space.

[edit] Maderno's nave

70 of 256 71 of 256

Maderno's nave, looking towards the chancel To the single bay of Michelangelo's Greek Cross, Maderno added a further three bays. He made the dimensions slightly different to Michelangelo's bay, thus defining where the two architectural works meet. Maderno also tilted the axis of the nave slightly. This was not by accident, as suggested by his critics. An ancient Egyptian obelisk had been erected in the square outside, but had not been quite aligned with Michelangelo's building, so Maderno compensated, in order that it should, at least, align with the Basilica's facade. [11] The nave has huge paired pilasters, in keeping with Michelangelo's work. The size of the interior is so "stupendously large" that it is hard to get a sense of scale within the building. [11] [27] The four cherubs who flutter against the first piers of the nave, carrying between them two Holy Water basins, appear of quite normal cherubic size, until approached. Then it becomes apparent that each one is over 2 metres high and that real children cannot reach the basins unless they scramble up the marble draperies. The aisles each have two smaller chapels and a larger rectangular chapel, the Chapel of the Sacrament and the Choir Chapel. These are lavishly decorated with marble, stucco, gilt, sculpture and mosaic. Remarkably, there are very few paintings, although some, such as Raphael's "Sistine Madonna" have been reproduced in mosaic. The most precious painting is a small icon of the Madonna, removed from the old basilica.[11] Maderno's last work at St. Peter's was to design a crypt-like space or "Confessio" under the dome, where the Cardinals and other privileged persons could descend in order to be nearer the burial place of the apostle. Its marble steps are remnants of the old basilica and around its balustrade are 95 bronze lamps.

[edit] Bernini's furnishings

[edit] Pope Urban VIII and Bernini As a young boy Gianlorenzo Bernini (1598–1680) visited St. Peter's with the painter Annibale Carracci and stated his wish to build "a mighty for the apostle". His wish came true. As a young man, in 1626, he received the patronage of Pope Urban VIII and worked on the embellishment of the Basilica for 50 years. Appointed as Maderno's successor in 1629, he was to become regarded as the greatest architect and sculptor of the Baroque period. Bernini's works at St. Peter's include the baldacchino, the Chapel of the Sacrament, the plan four the niches and loggias in the piers of the dome and the chair of St. Peter. [11] [19]

[edit] Baldacchino and niches Main article: St. Peter's baldachin Bernini's first work at St. Peter's was to design the baldacchino, a pavilion-like structure 30 metres (98 ft) tall and claimed to be the largest piece of bronze in the world, which stands beneath the dome and above the altar. Its design is based on the ciborium, of which there are many in the churches of Rome, serving to create a sort of holy space above and around the table on which the Sacrament is laid for the Eucharist and emphasizing the significance of this ritual. These ciborium are generally of white

71 of 256 72 of 256 marble, with inlaid coloured stone. Bernini's concept was for something very different. He took his inspiration in part from the baldachin or canopy carried above the head of the pope in processions, and in part from eight ancient columns that had formed part of a screen in the old basilica. Their twisted barley-sugar shape had a special significance as the column to which Jesus was bound before his crucifixion was believed to be of that shape. Based on these columns, Bernini created four huge columns of bronze, twisted and decorated with olive leaves and bees, which were the emblem of Pope Urban.

The altar with Bernini's baldacchino The baldacchino is surmounted not with an architectural pediment, like most baldacchini, but with curved Baroque brackets supporting a draped canopy, like the brocade canopies carried in processions above precious iconic images. In this case, the draped canopy is of bronze, and all the details, including the olive leaves, bees, and the portrait heads of Urban's niece in childbirth and her newborn son, are picked out in gold leaf. The baldacchino stands as a vast free-standing sculptural object, central to and framed by the largest space within the building. It is so large that the visual effect is to create a link between the enormous dome which appears to float above it, and the congregation at floor level of the basilica. It is penetrated visually from every direction, and is visually linked to the Cattedra Petri in the apse behind it and to the four piers containing large statues that are at each diagonal. [11] [19] As part of the scheme for the central space of the church, Bernini had the huge piers, begun by Bramante and completed by Michelangelo, hollowed out into niches, and had staircases made inside them, leading to four balconies. There was much dismay from those who thought that the dome might fall, but it did not. On the balconies Bernini created showcases, framed by the eight ancient twisted columns, to display the four most precious of the basilica: the spear of Longinus, said to have pierced the side of Christ, the veil of Veronica, with the miraculous image of the face of Christ, a fragment of the True Cross discovered in Jerusalem by Constantine's mother, Helena, and a relic of St. Andrew, the brother of St. Peter. In each of the niches that surround the central space of the basilica was placed a huge statue of the saint associated with the relic above. Only St. Longinus is the work of Bernini.[11] (See below)

72 of 256 73 of 256

[edit] Cattedra Petri and Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament

Bernini's "Cathedra Petri" and "Gloria" Bernini then turned his attention to another precious relic, the so-called Cathedra Petri or "throne of St. Peter" a chair which was often claimed to have been used by the apostle, but appears to date from the 12th century. As the chair itself was fast deteriorating and was no longer serviceable, Pope Alexander VII determined to enshrine it in suitable splendour as the object upon which the line of successors to Peter was based. Bernini created a large bronze throne in which it was housed, raised high on four looping supports held effortlessly by massive bronze statues of four Doctors of the Church, Saints and Augustine representing the Latin Church and Athanasius and John Chrysostum the Greek Church. The four figures are dynamic with sweeping robes and expressions of adoration and ecstasy. Behind and above the Cattedra, a blaze of light comes in through a window of yellow alabaster, illuminating, at its centre, the Dove of the Holy Spirit. The elderly painter, Andrea Sacchi, had urged Bernini to make the figures large, so that they would be seen well from the central portal of the nave. The chair was enshrined in its new home with great celebration of January 16, 1666. [11] [19] Bernini's final work for St. Peter's, undertaken in 1676, was the decoration of the Chapel of the Sacrament. To hold the sacramental Host, he designed a miniature version in gilt bronze of Bramante's Tempietto, the little chapel that marks the place of the death of St. Peter. On either side is an , one gazing in rapt adoration and the other looking towards the viewer in welcome. Bernini died in 1680 in his 82nd year.[11]

73 of 256 74 of 256

This wide-angle view of the interior shows the transept arms to right and left, and the chancel beyond the baldicchino.

[edit] St. Peter's Piazza Main article: Saint Peter's Square To the east of the basilica is the Piazza di San Pietro, (St. Peter's Square). The present arrangement, constructed between 1656 and 1667, is the Baroque inspiration of Bernini who inherited a location already occupied by an Egyptian obelisk of the 13th century BC, which was centrally placed, (with some contrivance) to Maderno's facade. The obelisk, known as "The Witness", at 25.5 metres (84 ft) and a total height, including base and the cross on top, of 40 metres (130 ft), is the second largest standing obelisk, and the only one to remain standing since its removal from Egypt and re-erection at the Circus of Nero in 37 AD, where it is thought to have stood witness to the crucifixion of St Peter. [28] Its removal to its present location by order of Pope Sixtus V and engineered by Domenico Fontana on September 28, 1586, was an operation fraught with difficulties and nearly ending in disaster when the ropes holding the obelisk began to smoke from the friction. Fortunately this problem was noticed by a sailor, and for his swift intervention, his village was granted the privilege of providing the palms that are used at the basilica each Palm Sunday.[11]

74 of 256 75 of 256

Two fountains form the axis of the piazza. The other object in the old square with which Bernini had to contend was a large fountain designed by Maderno in 1613 and set to one side of the obelisk, making a line parallel with the façade. Bernini's plan uses this horizontal axis as a major feature of his unique, spatially dynamic and highly symbolic design. The most obvious solutions were either a rectangular piazza of vast proportions so that the obelisk stood centrally and the fountain (and a matching companion) could be included, or a trapezoid piazza which fanned out from the façade of the basilica like that in front of the Palazzo Publicco in Siena. The problems of the square plan are that the necessary width to include the fountain would entail the demolition of numerous buildings, including some of the Vatican, and would minimise the effect of the facade. The trapezoid plan, on the other hand, would maximise the apparent width of the façade, which was already perceived as a fault of the design.[19] Bernini's ingenious solution was to create a piazza in two sections. That part which is nearest the basilica is trapezoid, but rather than fanning out from the façade, it narrows. This gives the effect of countering the visual perspective. It means that from the second part of the piazza, the building looks nearer than it is, the breadth of the façade is minimised and its height appears greater in proportion to its width. The second section of the piazza is a huge elliptical circus which gently slopes downwards to the obelisk at its centre. The two distinct areas are framed by a colonnade formed by doubled pairs of columns supporting an entabulature of the simple Tuscan Order. The part of the colonnade that is around the ellipse does not entirely encircle it, but reaches out in two arcs, symbolic of the arms of "the Roman reaching out to welcome its communicants". [19] The obelisk and Maderno's fountain mark the widest axis of the elipse. Bernini balanced the scheme with another fountain in 1675. The approach to the square used to be through a jumble of old buildings, which added an element of surprise to the vista that opened up upon passing through the colonnade. Nowadays a long wide street, the , built by Mussolini after the conclusion of the Lateran Treaties, leads from the River Tiber to the piazza and gives distant views of St. Peter's as the visitor approaches.[11] Bernini's transformation of the site is entirely Baroque in concept. Where Bramante and Michelangelo conceived a building that stood in "self-sufficient isolation", Bernini made the whole complex "expansively relate to its environment".[19] Banister Fletcher says "No other city has afforded such a wide-swept approach to its cathedral church, no other architect could have conceived a design of greater nobility...(it is) the greatest of all atriums before the greatest of all churches of Christendom."[6]

75 of 256 76 of 256

View of Rome from the Dome of St. Peter's Basilica

[edit] Treasures

[edit] Tombs and relics Main article: List of papal tombs There are over 100 tombs within St. Peter's Basilica (extant to various extents), many located in the Vatican grotto, beneath the Basilica. These include 91 popes, St. Ignatius of Antioch, Otto II, and the composer Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina. Exiled Catholic British royalty James Francis Edward Stuart and his two sons, Charles Edward Stuart and Henry Benedict Stuart, are buried here, having been granted asylum by Pope Clement XI. Also buried here are Maria Clementina Sobieska, wife of Charles Edward Stuart, and Queen Christina of Sweden, who abdicated her throne in order to convert to Catholicism. The most recent interment was Pope John Paul II, on April 8, 2005. Beneath, near the crypt, is the recently-discovered vaulted fourth-century "Tomb of the Julii". (See below for some descriptions of tombs)

76 of 256 77 of 256

[edit] Artworks

[edit] The towers and narthex

The Holy Door is opened only for great celebrations. In the towers to either side of the facade are two clocks. The clock on the left has been operated electrically since 1931. Its oldest bell dates from 1288. One of the most important treasures of the cathedral is a mosaic set above the central external door. Called the "Navicella", it is based on a design by Giotto (early 13th century) and represents a ship symbolising the Christian Church. At each end of the narthex is an equestrian figure, to the north Emperor Constantine by Bernini (1670) and to the south Charlemagne by Cornacchini (18th century). Of the five portals, three contain notable doors. The central portal has the Renaissance bronze door by Antonio Averulino (1455), enlarged to fit the new space. The southern door, the "Door of the Dead", was designed by 20th century sculptor Giacomo Manzù and includes a portrait of Pope John XXIII kneeling before the crucified figure of St. Peter. The northernmost door is the "Holy Door" which, by tradition, is opened only for holy years such as the Jubilee year. The present door is bronze and was designed by Vico Consorti in 1950. Above it are inscriptions commemorating the opening of the door: PAVLVS V PONT MAX ANNO XIII and GREGORIVS XIII PONT MAX. Recent commemorative plaques read: IOANNES PAVLVS II P.M. PORTAM SANCTAM IOANNES PAVLVS II P.M. PAVLVS VI PONT MAX ANNO IVBILAEI MCMLXXVI ITERVM PORTAM SANCTAM HVIVS PATRIARCALIS A PAVLO PP VI APERVIT ET CLAVSIT VATICANAE BASILICAE RESERVATAM ET CLAVSAM ANNO MAGNI IVBILAEI PORTAM SANCTAM APERVIT ET CLAVSIT AB INCARNATIONE DOMINI APERVIT ET CLAVSIT ANNO IVB HVMANE REDEMP MM-MMI ANNO IVBILAEI MCMLXXV MCMLXXXIII – MCMLXXXIV

John Paul II, Pontifex Maximus, Paul VI, Pontifex Maximus, In the jubilee year of human redemption 1983-4, again opened and closed the holy opened and closed the holy door John Paul II, Pontifex Maximus, opened and closed door in the year of the great jubilee, of this patriarchal Vatican again the holy door closed and set apart by Paul VI from the incarnation of the Lord basilica in the jubilee year of in 1976. 2000-2001. 1975.

77 of 256 78 of 256

[edit] The nave

The statue of Saint Peter, attributed to Arnolfo di Cambio • On the first piers of the nave are two Holy Water basins held by pairs of cherubs each 2 metres high, commissioned by Pope Benedict XIII from designer Agostino Cornacchini and sculptor Francesco Moderati, (1720s). • Along the floor of the nave are markers showing the comparative lengths of other churches, starting from the entrance. • On the decorative pilasters of the piers of the nave are medallions with relief depicting the first 38 popes. • In niches between the pilasters of the nave are statues depicting 39 founders of religious orders. • Set against the north east pier of the dome is a statue of St. Peter Enthroned, sometimes attributed to late 13th century sculptor Arnolfo di Cambio, with some scholars dating it to the 5th century. One foot of the statue is largely worn away due to centuries of pilgrims kissing it. • The sunken Confessio leading to the Vatican Grottoes (see above) contains a large kneeling statue by Canova of Pope Pius VI, who was captured and mistreated by the Napoleon's army. • The High Altar is surmounted by Bernini's baldachin. (See above) • Set in niches within the four piers supporting the dome are the statues associated with the basilica's holy relics: St. Helena holding the True Cross, by Andrea Bolgi); St. Longinus holding the spear that pierced the side of Jesus, by Bernini (1639); St. Andrew with the St. Andrew's Cross, by Francois Duquesnoy and St. Veronica holding her veil with the image of Jesus' face, by Francesco Mochi.

Saint Helena Saint LonginusSaint Andrew Saint Veronica

78 of 256 79 of 256

[edit] North aisle

The Pietà sculpted by Michelangelo

Truth, by Bernini, tramples England beneath her foot. • In the first chapel of the north aisle is Michelangelo's Pietà.[29] • On the first pier in the right aisle is the monument of Queen Christina of Sweden, who abdicated in 1654 in order to convert to Catholicism. • The second chapel, dedicated to St. Sebastian, contains the tombs of popes Pius XI and Pius XII. • The large chapel on the right aisle is the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament which contains the tabernacle by Bernini (1664) resembling Bramante's Tempietto at San Pietro in Montorio supported by two kneeling and with behind it a painting of the Holy Trinity by Pietro da Cortona. • Near the altar of Our Lady of Succour are the monuments of popes Gregory XIII by Camillo Rusconi (1723) and Gregory XIV. • At the end of the aisle is an altar containing the relics of St. Petronilla and with an altarpiece "The Burial of St Petronilla by Guercino (Giovanni Francesco Barbieri), 1623.

[edit] South aisle • The first chapel in the south aisle is the baptistry, commissioned by Pope Innocent XII and designed by Carlo Fontana, (great nephew of Domenico Fontana). The font, which was previously located in the opposite chapel, is the red porphyry sarcophagus of Probus, the 4th century Prefect of Rome. The lid came from a different sarcophagus, which had once held the remains of the Emperor Hadrian and in removing it from the Vatican Grotto where it had been

79 of 256 80 of 256

stored, the workmen broke it into ten pieces. Fontana restored it expertly and surmounted it with a gilt-bronze figure of the "Lamb of God". • Against the first pier of the aisle is the Monument to the Royal Stuarts, James and his sons, Charles Edward, known as "Bonnie Prince Charlie" and Henry, Cardinal and Duke of York. The tomb is a Neo-Classical design by Canova unveiled in 1819. Opposite it is the memorial of Charles Edward Stuart's wife, Maria Clementina Sobieska. • The second chapel is that of the Presentation of the Virgin' and contains the tombs of Pope Benedict XV and Pope John XXIII. • Against the piers are the tombs of Pope Pius X and Pope Innocennt VIII. • The large chapel off the south aisle is the Choir Chapel which contains the altar of the Imacculate Virgin Mary. • At the entrance to the Sacristy is the tomb of Pope Pius VIII • The south transept contains the altars of St. Thomas, St. Joseph and the Crucifixion of St. Peter. • The tomb of Fabio Chigi, Pope Alexander VII, towards the end of the aisle, is the work of Bernini and called by Lees-Milne "one of the greatest tombs of the Baroque Age". It occupies an awkward position, being set in a niche above a doorway into a small vestry, but Bernini has utilised the doorway in a symbolic manner. Pope Alexander kneels upon his tomb, facing outward. The tomb is supported on a large draped shroud patterned red marble, and is supported by four female figures, of whom only the two at the front are fully visible. They represent Charity and Truth. The foot of Truth rests upon a globe of the world, her toe being pierced symbolically by the thorn of Protestant England. Coming forth, seemingly, from the doorway as if it was the entrance to a tomb, is the skeletal winged figure of Death, its head hidden beneath the shroud, but its right hand carrying an hour-glass stretched upward towards the kneeling figure of the pope. [11]

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

80 of 256 81 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 7 . . . Pg. 81 . . . Radiological landmines on the soil of Italy and Rome aimed at U.S. Corporation Nuclear 'Target Magnets' . . . equivalent to the 20 kiloton Russian RA115 . . . described in U.S. House hearing 106-158 . . . same Radiological damage as U.S. Nuclear bombs inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during World War Two.

'Nuclear Crime' letter to Italy and Rome. 19 Jan 2009 SUBJECT: Qui-Tam War Crime Claim and Complaint litigation to the Attorneys General / Ministers of Justice in Middle East countries . . . .1. WAR CRIME CLAIM: Potential of Radiological Contamination of Holy St. Peters & Radiological Contamination of 3.5 million St. Peter's pilgrims in Vatican, Italy and Rome : A War Crime Claim against U.S. Attorney General Mukasey & former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales . . . .2. WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc- cpi.int/home.html&l=en) : (1) U.S. business targets in Monaco, Vatican, & France, Europe, potential victims of Nuclear Contamination Crimes : 'Nuclear-Crime' Contamination of Holy St. Peters & 3.5 million St. Peter's pilgrims in Maccah, 2008:

. . . .FROM: Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, H. Phone: 713-225-0123 ; Cell : 281 684 6028 ; [email protected] ; U.S. Court Case H-08- 60; eBook titles : http://www.kristianmenchaca.com ; Screen Play : http://www.writesafe.com/storage8/CANCOPY_cvrAfAmp_MATT.pdf ; http://www.writesafe.com/storage9/PRINCESS_22Jan05.pdf © 1997, 2004, 2005 . . . .TO: Ufficio del Capo del Dipartimento per gli Affari di giustizia CAPO DEL DIPARTIMENTO – Italo Ormanni VICE CAPO DEL DIPARTIMENTO VICARIO – Maria Teresa Saragnano VICE CAPO DEL DIPARTIMENTO – Alfonso Malato Via Arenula, 70 – 00186 Roma, tel. +39 06.68851, fax +39 06.68897768

Gentlemen:

. . . The following is a 'Nuclear Crime tort' Claim to the Attorneys General / Ministers of Justice in

Italy and Rome countries . The 'Nuclear Crime' truths described in the following Claim to your

Minister of Justice are virtually "irrefutable." Al Qaida Terrorists have several times announced intent to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries. And, Plaintiffs are victims of Terrorist

81 of 256 82 of 256 intent and efforts to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries. This means that Hilton Hotels and other large U.S. Corporation holdings will be facing some questions in Italy and Rome, especially if the Holy St. Peters shows positive when scanned by a Geiger Counter, now, or in the future.

We are seeking Middle East law firms to litigate Nuclear Crime questions in the Saudi Court after the Attorneys General are served copies of our Nuclear Crime Complaint that the War Criminal

Bush-Mukasey U.S. administration has taken efforts to wrongfully conceal and suppress.

Our introductory letter to said Middle East Attorneys General follows:

. . . . PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:

. . . . "We, the family of PFC Kristian Menchaca seek to file Qui Tam litigation in Italy and Rome regarding potential "Radiological cross-contamination" of Islamic countries whose U.S. Corporation guest businesses are at high risk of being Radiologically attacked and Radiologically poisoned with

Radiological contamination that unintentionally cross-contaminates other sites, such as

"unintentional Radiological contamination" of the Holy St. Peters in Vatican, Italy and Rome, after

'Nuclear-Crime' attack on an American business in Vatican, which should be considered in the following "Qui Tam Claim for Damage, Injury, or Death.

. . . . CAUSE #1 OF 'Qui Tam' ACTION: . . . PFC Kristian Menchaca (Killed, Iraq: 19 Jun 2006),

U.S. Army, was assigned to a U.S. Military operation in Iraq seeking to locate and nullify Nuclear

Weapons of Mass Destruction ("WMD") in Iraq that might be used in "Nuclear Crimes' against U.S. targets in the U.S., used against U.S. Corporation targets in Europe, and used against U.S.

Corporation targets located in Italy and Rome, Africa, and South America.

. . . While home in Texas, during May 2006, Kristian Menchaca explained to members of his family he was present during U.S. Army interrogation of captured terrorists in Iraq, early 2006; and, said

Terrorists explained that they were transporting "hot" Uranium ore tailings from Uranium mines in

Iran, by truckload, to Iraq for export out of Iraq to serve purposes of Radiologically 'stealth' attacking & contaminating U.S. Corporations doing business in Middle East countries, and attack

82 of 256 83 of 256

U.S. Corporations doing business in Europe, in Africa, South america and USA.

. . . . After his Army leave finished in the USA, PFC Kristian Menchaca returned to Iraq in June

2008 and was eventually captured together with PFC Thomas Tucker by al Shura Nuclear Jihad

Terrorists who barbarically tortured both to death from 16 Jun to 19 Jun 2009.

. . . . PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were fighting to stop Nuclear Crime

Radiological attack against U.S. Corporation properties in Italy and Rome that would have undoubtedly produced catastrophic cross-contamination of land, Western people, and nearby businesses that become collateral victims of Nuclear Crimes in countries attacked with Radiological

"Nuclear Crime" poisons.

. . . . Such a "Nuclear Crime" potential has been hypothetically described of Vatican, Italy and

Rome, wherein the rooms of the American Hilton Hotel in Vatican or other Saudi cities could be

Radiologically stealth-contaminated with "Hot" Uranium / Radium ore oxides of radiation counts exceeding 50-100 mR / hr. exposure rates, more than 25 times the exposure of Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html : rules for a nuclear power plant), which require evacuation at 2 mR /hr. to prevent fatal exposure to Nuclear radioactivity.

. . . . Currently, all U.S. Corporations, by their presence with business property addresses in Italy and Rome, are antagonizing "Nuclear Crime" Radiological attacks against all U.S. Corporation business holdings inside Western countries.

. . . . If the premises of any American-owned business in Vatican are radiologically contaminated in a Nuclear Crime attack, then common sense makes us realize that the Holy St. Peters could become Radiologically "cross-contaminated" by innocent pilgrims who have been previously

Radiologically contaminated by deadly Uranium/Radium particles attached their clothing from exposure inside their Radiologically contaminated hotel rooms. Unlike Anthrax, lethal

Uranium/Radium contamination is virtually impossible to effectively clean-up. A Geiger Counter will always be able to detect some remaining lethal Uranium/Radium contamination particles that

83 of 256 84 of 256 may be lethally inhaled at a target site no matter how often cleaned. In essence, the reality is that

"once a city becomes "Nuclear Crime" contaminated unto the condition of a "Nuclear wasteland," it will remain a wasteland until the Radiological contaminant, Radium 226, decays to safe levels, likely taking sixteen centuries, a very long time.

. . . Anyone, commoner and royalty, alike, is a potential victim of inhaling Radium 226 dust particles into his lungs where they cannot be removed. The X-rays of Radium contaminated lungs in Radiologically contaminated victims display Radium particles like stars glowing in the midnight universe, a picture of certain death a-coming as caused by Radium inhalation, which leads to eye cataracts, bone cancer rot, liver, breast cancer, and other related Cancers that generally kill within a few years or less.

. . . SEE: RADIUM-226 AND 228: Radium is a known cancer-causing substance. Exposure to radium can lead to eye cataracts, bone, liver and breast cancer. http://www.oasisllc.com/abgx/effects.htm#faq11

Contact: http://www.setonresourcecenter.com/hazcom/ATSDR/Docs/wcd00001/wcd0013c.pdf ; http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts144.html

. . . SEE: http://www.oasisllc.com/abgx/effects.htm#faq11

. . . Also SEE: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Agency for

Toxic Substances and Disease, Registry, WWW is http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html ; Email:

[email protected] ; 24/7 Emergency Contact Number: 1-888-295-5156 Revised: 04/2007

. . . Terrorists intent to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries can be easily prevented throughout Italy and Rome and Italy and Rome by US Corporations voluntarily selling their business Corporations and evacuating to maintain Nuclear peace in Italy and Rome, Italy and

Rome , Europe, South America, and Africa.

. . . . Presented with the undeniable fact that Terrorists have announced intent to destroy U.S. corporations in these Western countries, it makes a great deal of good sense for U.S.

Corporations to voluntarily sell and change ownership to local Saudi ownership or change U.S.

84 of 256 85 of 256

Corporation ownership to other Middle East Investors who could purchase U.S. owned

Corporations that are Nuclear Crime targets in all Western Middle East countries, including Italy and Rome and Indonesia, and thereby remove U.S. owned Corporations from the "Nuclear Crime" list of targets.

. . . SEE: U.S. District Court, New York, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 03 CV 6978, regarding World Trade Center.

. . . . Such a change of ownership can be accomplished without loss of initial investment money to

U.S. Corporations. Moreover, a change of U.S. Corporation ownership can be done without loss of tax revenue to the host country. This "change of ownership" is a simple answer to a catastrophic

"Nuclear Crime" threat potential that can be effectively eliminated by the simple sale of property.

Therefore, the larger question is why not immediately advertise U.S. corporations for sale across

Italy and Rome and then sell them to prevent "Nuclear Crime" and keep the peace ! ! !

. . . . After all, why should the lives of the people of Italy and Rome and the sanctity of the Holy

St. Peters be threatened just so American business Corporations may continue to make profits in

Italy and Rome at the expense of her people and her sanctity, AND "Nuclear Crime" risk to the

Holy St. Peters ?

. . . . This is an unconscionable Nuclear Crime condition; and, it can be easily changed by

American corporations "Voluntarily" selling and divesting their Middle East properties to prevent nuclear War Crimes causing catastrophic "Nuclear War Crimes" in Middle East Countries.

. . . If any U.S. corporation does not want to sell to remove itself from the "Nuclear War Crime" list of American "Nuclear Crime" magnet corporations, the question is: "Why not?"

. . . American Corporations should be required by court action to address this catastrophic

"Nuclear War Crime" situation in all Western countries where American Corporation presence creates increased potential for "Nuclear War Crime"; and, they should volunteer to divest themselves from ownership and then depart said countries in the interest of preventing Nuclear

Crime cross-contamination of said Western countries and saving lives of citizens who would be killed in a Nuclear Crime attack on American-owned businesses in said Western countries.

85 of 256 86 of 256

. . . Currently, it is apparent that U.S. corporations in Western countries are willing to continue business no matter what the cost to their Western 'host' countries and people who host U.S.

Corporate businesses inside their borders. This American Corporation willingness in Western countries to expose citizens of Western countries to "Nuclear Crime" is wrongful.

. . . The American owners and managers of U.S. Corporation businesses are always located in their headquarter offices, in the USA, managing their Western country Corporations and 'rarely' or 'never' are present when Nuclear Crime catastrophe may strike. Thus, there is little incentive to be concerned about the potential of Radiological death against their employees attacked as victims of "Nuclear Crimes" inflicted with easily available Uranium/Radium 226 Radiological poison from abandoned "Uranium Open Pit Mines" in Iran, Pakistan, Europe, Africa, 500 abandoned

"Uranium Open Pit Mines" in Texas, Arizona, Dakotas, Colorado-Utah plateau, New Mexico: abandoned Mi Vida Mine in Moab, Utah; abandoned South Terras Mine in Cornwall, England that yield some of the "hottest" Uranium ores ever recorded, most Uranium ore in the range of 50-100 mR / hr. SEE: http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/cwillis/rad/hirocks.html

. . . Once volunteered change of U.S. ownership of Nuclear Crime corporation targets takes place with "diplomacy" in all these Western countries to remove them from the "Nuclear Crime Target

List" for purposes of achieving peace, and after these U.S. Corporation properties are sold to

Middle East Investors, all of the Nuclear Crime antagonisms should disappear when American

Corporations depart throughout Italy and Rome leaving no reason for "Nuclear Jihad" to continue against a country that has no American-owned businesses.

. . . . Otherwise, if American Corporations do not divest and depart throughout Italy and Rome,

U.S. business presence in Italy and Rome will continue to jeopardize the Nuclear peace of Italy and Rome until Court action is taken to prove that U.S. Corporations must volunteer to leave Italy and Rome to maintain world Nuclear peace in Italy and Rome. While there has not been another attack on U.S. soil, the number of terrorist acts against 'easier-to-strike targets of opportunity' around the world has increased; Iran has gained influence in the Mideast; North Korea still hasn't

86 of 256 87 of 256 verifiably declared its nuclear work; anti-Americanism abroad has emboldened extremists.

. . .The evidence is irrefutable that the abandoned "Mi Vida" Mine in Moab, Utah and abandoned

South Terras Mine in Cornwall, England yield some of the "hottest" Uranium ores ever recorded. i

Uranium / radium ores from "hot" mines test in the range of 50-100 mR / hr.

. . . SEE: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html

. . . Therefore, it is urgent that Middle East Courts supervise an orderly withdrawal of U.S.

Corporations from Italy and Rome, whereby, U.S. Corporations could sell their holdings without

"loss of initial investment" and depart. The host country would not lose tax revenue as the new business owners could continue to operate the business as is or build it into a larger enterprise with no risk of "Nuclear Crime" attack.

CAUSE #2 OF 'Qui Tam' ACTION:. . . Cause #2 of Action is related to Cause #1. Plaintiffs, a family of Americans, were first victimized by Nuclear Jihad terrorists who tortured to death their family member, PFC Kristian Menchaca, a U.S. Army soldier serving in Iraq. Then, the Kristian Menchaca family was simultaneously victimized by the government of President G.W. Bush and his Attorneys

General, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey, in the Bush Administration, by their deliberated efforts to thwart Plaintiffs' litigation of U.S. District Court Case 08-60 filed February 2008 regarding the wrongful death of Kristian Menchaca in Iraq as it was manipulated by U.S. Executive

Branch reward denials administered by former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. After Gonzales left office, U.S. Attorney General Michael "Waterboard" Mukasey took office and continued offering insufficient Gonzales-devisd $50,000 for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War who were all tortured to death or murdered as a consequence of the Gonzales-Mukasey $50,000 rewards.

The U.S. justice Department did manipulate U.S. laws against Plaintiff Kristian Menchaca family denying them court access and denying them Victim/Witness protection in their efforts to litigate these issues in an effort to save lives of U.S. soldiers and be compensated for their loss of Kristian

Menchaca.

87 of 256 88 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 8 . . . Pg. 88. . . painted by Michelangelo between 1508 and 1512 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Sistine Chapel ceiling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The iconic image of the Hand of God giving life to Adam.

88 of 256 89 of 256

The interior of the Sistine Chapel showing the ceiling in relation to the other frescos For images see: Gallery of Sistine Chapel ceiling

The Sistine Chapel ceiling, painted by Michelangelo between 1508 and 1512, is one of the most renowned artworks of the High Renaissance. The ceiling is that of the large Sistine Chapel built within the Vatican by Pope Sixtus IV, begun in 1477 and finished by 1480. The chapel is the Papal Chapel within the Vatican, and is the location for Papal Conclaves and many important services. The ceiling's various painted elements comprise part of a larger scheme of decoration within the Sistine Chapel which includes the large fresco of The Last Judgment on the sanctuary wall, also by Michelangelo, wall paintings by a team of the most highly regarded painters of the late 15th century including Botticelli and Perugino, and a set of large tapestries by Raphael, the whole illustrating much of the doctrine of the Catholic Church. [1] [2] (Main article:Sistine Chapel) Central to the ceiling decoration are nine scenes from the Book of Genesis of which the Creation of Adam is the best known, having an iconic standing equalled only by Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa, the hands of God and Adam being reproduced in countless imitations.[3]

89 of 256 90 of 256 History

Pope Julius II by Raphael In 1506 Pope Julius II conceived a program to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.[4] Around the central area of the walls of the chapel there already existed a complex scheme of paintings illustrating the Life of Christ and the Life of Moses. It had been carried out by some of the most renowned Renaissance painters, Perugino, Botticelli, Ghirlandaio, Pintoricchio and Cosimo Rosselli.[1] Michelangelo, who was not primarily a painter but a sculptor, was reluctant to take on the work. Also, he was occupied with a very large sculptural commission for the Pope's own tomb. The Pope was adamant, leaving Michelangelo no choice but to accept. But a war with the French broke out, diverting the attention of the Pope who was a powerful military leader, and Michelangelo fled from Rome to continue sculpting. The tomb sculptures, however, were never to be finished because in 1508 the Pope returned to Rome victorious and summoned Michelangelo to begin work on the ceiling. The contract was signed on 10 May 1508.[4] The proposed scheme was for twelve large figures of the Apostles. But Michelangelo changed the scheme for a much more complex design which eventually comprised some three hundred figures and took four years, being completed in 1512. [4] [5] Contrary to popular belief, he painted in a standing position, not lying on his back. According to Vasari, "The work was carried out in extremely uncomfortable conditions, from his having to work with his head tilted upwards". [5] [6] Michelangelo described his physical discomfort in a humorous sonnet accompanied by a little sketch.[7]

90 of 256 91 of 256

Michelangelo's illustration to his sonnet “ Here like a cat in a Lombardy sewer! Swelter and toil!

With my neck puffed out like a pigeon,

belly hanging like an empty sack,

beard pointing at the ceiling, and my brain

fallen backwards in my head!

Breastbone bulging like a harpy’s

and my face, from drips and droplets,

patterned like a marble pavement.

Ribs are poking in my guts; the only way

to counterweight my shoulders is to stick

my butt out. Don’t know where my feet are-

they’re just dancing by themselves!

In front I’ve sagged and stretched; behind,

my back is tauter than an archer’s bow! ”

91 of 256 92 of 256 [edit] Michelangelo's scheme realised

The ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, "an artistic vision without precedent" [8]

[edit] Method

The location of the scaffolding is evident on this lunette In order to reach the chapel's ceiling, Michelangelo designed his own scaffold, a flat wooden platform on brackets built out from holes in the wall near the top of the windows, rather than being built up from the floor which would have involved a massive structure and would have meant that the chapel was unavailable for services. The areas of the wall covered by the scaffolding still appear as unpainted ares across the bottom of the lunettes. The holes were re-used to hold scaffolding in the latest restoration.

92 of 256 93 of 256

The scaffolding did not occupy the entire area of the ceiling. The painting was done in three stages. The reports of Michelangelo's pupil and biographer Condivi, indicate that the brackets and frame which supported the steps and flooring were all put in place at the beginning and some sort of light-weight screen, possibly of cloth, was suspended beneath them to catch plaster drips, dust and splashes of paint, but only half the building was scaffolded at a time.[9] The painting technique employed was fresco, in which the paint is applied to damp plaster. Michelangelo was experienced with this method of painting, having been trained in the workshop of Ghirlandaio, one of the most competent and prolific of Florentine fresco painters, who completed several important fresco cycles in churches in Florence and whose work was represented on the walls of the Sistine Chapel.[10] At the outset, the plaster, intonaco, began to grow mold because it was too wet. Michelangelo had to remove it and start again. He then tried a new formula created by one of his assistants, Jacopo l'Indaco, which resisted mold, and entered the Italian building tradition.

The evidence of the plaster laid for a day's work can be seen around the head and arm of this ignudo Because he was painting fresco, the plaster was laid in a new section every day, called a giornata. At the beginning of each session, the edges would be scraped away and a new area laid down. This is more apparent in the Last Judgement than on the ceiling. The reason that Michelangelo employed the fresco technique is that if the artist worked onto completely dry plaster, then the medium in every brushstroke sank in immediately and the pigment could not be manipulated as well, and did not bond as well to the plaster. The disadvantage of fresco painting is that the plaster becomes very hot while it is setting and gives off fumes. It was customary for fresco painters to use a full-sized detailed drawing, a cartoon, to transfer a design onto a plaster surface—many frescoes show little holes made with a stiletto, outlining the figures. Here Michelangelo broke with convention; once confident in the application of fresco, he drew directly onto the ceiling. His energetic sweeping outlines can be seen scraped into some of the surfaces,[11] while on others a grid is evident, indicating that he enlarged directly onto the ceiling from a small drawing. Michelangelo painted onto the damp plaster using a wash technique to apply broad areas of colour, then as the surface became drier, he revisited these areas with a more linear approach, adding shade and detail with a variety of brushes. For some textured surfaces, such as facial hair and woodgrain, he used a broad brush with bristles as sparse as a comb. Altogether, Michelangelo's techniques show the skill that one would expect of Ghirlandaio's greatest pupil. He employed all the finest workshop methods and best innovations, combining them with a diversity of brushwork and breadth of skill far exceeding

93 of 256 94 of 256 that of the meticulous Ghirlandaio. The work commenced at the end of the building furthest from the altar and coinciding with the latest of the narrative scenes, rather than the earliest. The first three scenes, from the story of Noah, contain a much larger number of small figures than the later panels. This is partly because of the subject matter, which deals with the fate of Humanity, but also because all the figures at that end of the ceiling, including the prophets and ignudi, are smaller than in the central section. The scale further increased in the third section. As the scale got larger, so did Michelangelo's style become broader, the final narrative scene of God in the act of Creation was painted in a single day.

This image of God was painted in a single day. The bright colours and broad, cleanly-defined outlines make each subject easily visible from the floor. Despite the height of the ceiling the proportions of the Creation of Adam are such that when standing beneath it, "it appears as if the viewer could simply raise a finger and meet those of God and Adam". The colours, which now appear so fresh and spring-like with pale pink, apple green, vivid yellow and sky blue against a background of warm pearly grey, were so discoloured by candlesmoke as to make the pictures seem almost monochrome. The long restoration (1981 through 1994) has removed the filter of grime to reveal the colours again. Vasari tells us that the ceiling is "unfinished", that its unveiling occurred before it could be reworked with gold leaf and vivid blue lapis lazuli as was customary with frescoes and in order to better link the ceiling with the walls below it which were highlighted with a great deal of gold. But this never took place, in part because Michelangelo was reluctant to set up the scaffolding again, and probably also because the gold and particularly the intense blue would have distracted from his painterly conception. Some areas were, in fact, decorated with gold:- the shields between the ignudi and the columns between the prophets and sybils. It seems very likely that the gilding of the shields was part of Michelangelo's original scheme since they are painted to resemble a certain type of processional shield, a number of which still exist.[12] Section reference. [5] [2] [6] [13] [14]

[edit] Content The subject matter of the ceiling is the doctrine of humanity's need for Salvation as offered by God through Jesus. It is about Humankind's need for a covenant with God. The old covenant of the Children

94 of 256 95 of 256 of Israel through Moses and the new covenant through Christ Jesus had already been represented around the walls of the chapel.[15]

The Downfall of Adam and Eve and their Expulsion from the Garden of Eden. The ceiling illustrates that God made the World as a perfect creation and put humanity into it, humanity fell into disgrace and was punished by death, and by separation from God. God sent Prophets and Sibyls to tell humanity that the Saviour or Christ, Jesus, would bring them redemption. God prepared a lineage of people, all the way from Adam, through various characters written of in the Old Testament, such as King , to the Virgin Mary through whom the Saviour of humanity, Jesus, would come. The various components of the ceiling are linked to this doctrine. But there was another factor. During the 15th century in Italy, and in Florence in particular, there was a strong interest in Classical literature and the philosophy of Humanism. Michelangelo, as a young man, had spent time at the Humanist academy established by the Medici family in Florence. He was familiar with early Humanist-inspired sculptural works such as Donatello's bronze David, and had himself responded by carving the enormous nude marble David which was placed in the piazza near the Palazzo Vecchio, the home of Florence's council. The Humanist vision of humanity was one in which people responded to other people, to social responsibility and to God in a direct way, not through intermediaries, such as the Church. This conflicted with the Church's emphasis. While the Church emphasised humanity as essentially sinful and flawed, Humanism emphasised humanity as potentially noble and beautiful. These two views were not necessarily irreconcilable to the Church, but only through a recognition that the unique way to achieve this "elevation of spirit, mind and body" was through the Church as the agent of God. To be outside the Church was to be beyond Salvation.

The prophet Daniel In the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo has presented both Catholic and Humanist elements in a way that does not appear visually conflicting, but the inclusion of "non-Christian" figures can appear as an ideological conflict to those more familiar with the intensely "religious" works of the

95 of 256 96 of 256

Counter Reformation and unfamiliar with the rationalising of Humanist and Christian thought of the Renaissance. The main components of the design are nine scenes from the Book of Genesis, of which five smaller ones are each framed and supported by four naked youths or "ignudi". At either end, and beneath the scenes are the figures of twelve men and women who prophesied the birth of Jesus. On the crescent- shaped areas, or "lunettes", above each of the chapel's windows are the Ancestors of Christ, identified by name. In the triangular spandrels above them are a further eight groups of figures, the identity of which is not known and which is subject to speculation. The scheme is completed by four large corner pendentives each showing a dramatic Biblical story. The iconography of the ceiling has had various interpretations in the past, some elements of which have been contradicted by modern scholarship[16] and others of which continue to defy interpretation. Of interest to some modern scholars is the question of how Michelangelo's own spiritual and psychological state is reflected in the iconography and the artistic expression of the ceiling.[17] Section reference [2] [5]

[edit] Architectural scheme

Plan of the architectural elements, real and illusionary

[edit] Real The Sistine Chapel is 40.5 metres long and 14 metres wide. The ceiling rises to 20 metres above the main floor of the chapel. The vault is of quite a complex nature and it is unlikely that it was originally

96 of 256 97 of 256 intended to have such complex decoration. Pier Matteo d'Amelia provided a plan for its decoration with the architectural elements picked out and the ceiling painted blue and dotted with gold stars, similar to that of the Arena Chapel decorated by Giotto at Padua. The chapel walls have three horizontal tiers with six windows in the upper tier down each side. There were also two windows at each end, but these have been closed up above the altar when Michelangelo's Last Judgement was painted. Between the windows are large pendentives which support the vault. Between the pendentives are triangularly shaped arches or spandrels cut into the vault above each window. Above the height of the pendentives, the ceiling slopes gently without much deviation from the horizontal. This is the real architecture. Michelangelo has elaborated it with illusionary or fictive architecture.[1]

[edit] Illusionary

God dividing the waters, showing the illusionary architecture, and the positions of the ignudi and shields The first element in the scheme of painted architecture is the defining of the real architectural elements by painted decorative courses that look like stone moldings.[18] The decorative courses have two repeating motifs, a formula common to such decorations in Classical Roman buildings.[19] In this case one motif is the acorn, the symbol of the Pope's family, the Rovere.[20] The other motif is the scallop shell, one of the symbols of the Blessed Virgin Mary to whom the chapel is dedicated. Part of Michelangelo's painted design are broad architectural ribs of travertine which appear to cross the ceiling from one pendentive to another, further supported by similar architectural bands at either end of the chapel. The ten painted cross-ribs divide the ceiling into alternately wide and narrow pictorial spaces. Above the level of the spandrels, where the ceiling flattens, is painted a strongly-projecting cornice that runs right around the ceiling, enclosing the main pictorial areas. These fictive architectural elements form a grid in which all the figures have defined spaces. Integrated with the painted architecture are a great number of small figures the purpose of which appears to be purely decorative. These include two seemingly-marble putti below the cornice on each rib, stone rams-heads above the spandrels, figures like animated book-ends hiding in the shadows of the ribs and little putti, both clothed and unclothed who strike a variety of poses as they support the name-plates of the prophets and sybils.

97 of 256 98 of 256

Above the cornice and to either side of the smaller scenes are an array of round shields. They are in part supported by twenty more figures, not part of the architecture, but sitting on inlaid plinths, their feet planted convincingly on the fictive cornice. They are the so-called ignudi. [21] [4]

[edit] Pictorial scheme

Plan of the pictorial elements of the ceiling showing the division of the narrative scenes into three parts themes

[edit] Nine scenes from the Book of Genesis Along the central section of the ceiling, Michelangelo depicted nine scenes from the Book of Genesis, the first book of the Bible. The pictures fall into three groups of three. The first group shows God creating the Heavens and the Earth. The second group shows God creating the first man and woman, Adam and Eve, and their disobedience of God and consequent expulsion from the Garden of Eden where they have lived and where they walked with God. The third group of three pictures shows the plight of Humanity, and in particular the family of Noah. The pictures are not in strictly chronological order. If they are perceived as three groups, then the pictures in each of the three units inform upon each other, in the same way as was usual in Medieval paintings and stained glass.[22]

98 of 256 99 of 256

Detail of the Face of God The scenes are painted so as to be viewed looking from the altar towards the main door and are ordered accordingly, as follows: 1. The Separation of Light and Darkness 2. The Creation of the Sun, Moon and Earth 3. The Separation of Land and Water 4. The Creation of Adam 5. The Creation of Eve 6. The Temptation and Expulsion 7. The Sacrifice of Noah 8. The Great Flood 9. The Drunkenness of Noah

[edit] Creation The three Creation pictures show scenes from the first chapter of Genesis, which relates that God created the Earth and all that is in it in six days, resting on the seventh day. In the first scene, the First Day of Creation, God creates light and separates light from darkness. Chronologically, the next scene takes place in the third panel, in which, on the Second Day, God divides the waters from the heavens. In the central panel, the largest of the three, there are two representations of God. On the Third Day, God creates the Earth and makes it sprout plants. On the Fourth Day, God puts the Sun and the Moon in place to govern the night and the day, the time and the seasons of the year. On the Fifth Day, God created the birds of the air and fish and creatures of the deep, but we are not shown this. Neither do we see God's creation of the creatures of the earth on the Sixth Day. [4] [23] [2] These three scenes, completed in the third stage of painting, are the most broadly conceived, the most broadly painted and the most dynamic of all the pictures. Of the first scene Vasari says "...Michelangelo depicted God dividing Light from Darkness, showing him in all his majesty as he rests self-sustained with arms outstretched, in a revelation of love and creative power."[5]

99 of 256 100 of 256

[edit] Adam and Eve

The Creation of Adam For the central section of the ceiling, Michelangelo has taken four episodes from the story of Adam and Eve as told in the first, second and third chapters of Genesis. In this sequence of three, two of the panels are large and one small. In the first of the pictures, and one of the most widely recognised images in the history of painting, Michelangelo shows God reaching out to touch Adam, who, in the words of Vasari, is "a figure whose beauty, pose and contours are such that it seems to have been fashioned that very moment by the first and supreme creator rather than by the drawing and brush of a mortal man."[5] The central scene, of God creating Eve from the side of the sleeping Adam has been taken in its composition directly from another Creation sequence familiar to Michelangelo from his youth, the relief panels by Jacopo della Quercia that surround the door of the Basilica of San Petronio, Bologna. [24] In the final panel of this sequence Michelangelo shows two contrasting scenes, that of Adam and Eve taking fruit from the forbidden tree, Eve trustingly taking it from the hand of the Serpent and Adam eagerly picking it for himself; and their banishment from the Garden of Eden, where they have lived in the company of God, to the world outside where they have to fend for themselves and experience death. [4] [25] [2]

Detail from the Great Flood.

100 of 256 101 of 256

[edit] Story of Noah As with the first sequence of pictures, the three panels concerning Noah, taken from the sixth to ninth chapters of Genesis are thematic rather than chronological. In the first scene is shown the sacrifice of a sheep. Vasari, in writing about this scene mistakes it for the sacrifices by Cain and Abel, in which Abel's sacrifice was acceptable to God and Cain's was not. What this image almost certainly depicts is the sacrifice made by the family of Noah, after their safe deliverance from the Great Flood which destroyed the rest of Humankind.[2] The central, larger, scene shows the Great Flood. The Ark in which Noah's family escaped floats at the rear of the picture while the rest of humanity tries frantically to scramble to some point of safety. This picture, which has a large number of figures, conforms the most closely to the format of the paintings that had been done around the walls. The final scene is the story of Noah's drunkenness. After the Flood, Noah tills the soil and grows vines. He is shown doing so, in the background of the picture. He becomes drunk and inadvertently exposes himself. His youngest son, Ham, brings his two brothers Shem and Japheth to see the sight but they discreetly cover their father with a cloak. Ham is later cursed by Noah and told that the descendents of his son Canaan will serve Shem and Japheth's descendents forever. Taken together, these three pictures serve to show that Humankind had moved a long way from God's perfect creation. However, it is through Shem and his descendants, the Israelites, that Salvation will come to the world. [26] [2]

[edit] Shields Adjacent to the smaller Biblical scenes and supported by the ignudi are ten circular pageant shields, painted to resemble bronze or leather and with their details picked out in gold leaf. Each is decorated with a picture drawn from the Old Testament or the Book of Maccabees from the Apocrypha. The subject in almost every case is one of the more gruesome or shameful of Biblical episodes, the only exception being that of Elijah being swept up to Heaven in a Chariot of Fire, leaving Elisha in a state of despair.[27] In four of the five most highly finished medallions the space is crowded with figures in violent action, similar to Michelangelo's cartoon for the Battle of Cascina. The technique that Michelangelo has employed is unusual in fresco, and may be original in its employment on this scale, but is not unique. He has utilised the same technique that was employed for decorating shields used in pageants and is similar to that used when drawing in metal point and white chalk on a coloured ground. The ground colour (in this case red ochre streaked with black) makes the background and all the mid tones in the composition. The shadowed edges are then painted or rather, drawn with a brush and the shadows drawn in a highly linear manner that defines the contours of the forms. On coloured paper, the highlights and brightly lit contours would usually be drawn with white chalk or finely painted in white paint. But in this case, gold leaf entirely replaces the white and has been applied exactly as if it had been drawn on, using the same method of defining contour as the black lines.[12] This application of gold serves to link the ceiling frescoes to some extent with those around the walls. In the latter, gold leaf has been applied lavishly to many details and in some of the frescoes, notably those by Perugino, has been most expertly used not just to detail the robes but to highlight the folds by subtle graduation in the density of golden flecks. It is this technique that Michelangelo has picked up

101 of 256 102 of 256 on and carried a step further, inspired also perhaps by the medallions that appear on a Roman triumphal arch in Botticelli's episode from the Life of Moses, showing the punishment of the Sons of Corah.

Detail of The Idol of Baal, showing the linear use of black paint and gold leaf defining forms. The medalions represent:- • Abraham about to sacrifice his son Isaac • The Destruction of the Statue of Baal • The worshippers of Baal being brutally slaughtered. • Uriah being beaten to death. • Nathan the priest condemning King David for murder and corruption. • King David's traitorous son Absalom caught by his hair in a tree while trying to escape and beheaded by David's troops. • Abner sneaking up on Joab to murder him • Joram being hurled from a chariot onto his head. • Elijah being carried up to Heaven • On one medalion the subject is either obliterated or incomplete. Section references [2] [1] [4]

[edit] Twelve prophetic figures On the five pendentives along each side and the two at either, Michelangelo painted the largest figures on the ceiling: twelve people who prophesied or represented some aspect of the Coming of Christ. Of those twelve, seven were Prophets of Israel and were male. The remaining five were prophets of the Classical World, called Sibyls and were female. The prophet Jonah is placed above the altar and Zechariah at the further end. The other male and female figures alternate down each side, each being identified by an inscription on a painted marble panel supported by a putto.

102 of 256 103 of 256

The Libyan Sibyl

• Jonah (IONAS) - above the altar • Jeremiah (HIEREMIAS) • Persian Sibyl (PERSICHA) • Ezekiel (EZECHIEL) • Erythraean Sibyl . (ERITHRAEA) • Joel (IOEL) • Zechariah (ZACHERIAS) - above the main door of the chapel • Delphic Sibyl . (DELPHICA) • Isaiah (ESAIAS) • Cumaean Sibyl . (CVMAEA) • Daniel (DANIEL) • Libyan Sibyl (LIBICA)

[edit] Prophets The seven prophets of Israel chosen for depiction on the ceiling include the four so-called Major Prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel. Of the remaining twelve possibilities among the Minor Prophets, the three represented are Joel, Zechariah and Jonah. Although the prophets Joel and Zechariah are considered "minor" because of the comparatively small number of pages that their prophecy occupies in the Bible, each one produced prophesies of profound significance.

103 of 256 104 of 256

The prophet Joel They are often quoted, Joel for his "Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your elderly shall dream dreams and your youth shall see visions".[28] These words are significant for Michelangelo's decorative scheme, where women take their place among men and the youthful Daniel sits across from the brooding Jeremiah with his long white beard. Zechariah prophesied "Behold! Your King comes to you, humble and riding on a donkey".[29] His place in the chapel is directly above the door through which the Pope is carried in procession on Palm Sunday, the day on which Jesus fulfilled the prophecy by riding into Jerusalem on a donkey and being proclaimed King. Jonah's main prophesy concerned the downfall of the city of Nineveh. This alone does not seem to warrant him a place above the High Altar. But there is another factor involved. It is the person of Jonah himself that is of symbolic and prophetic significance, a significance which was commonly understood and had been represented in countless works of art including manuscripts and stained glass windows. [22] Jonah, through his reluctance to obey God, was swallowed by a "mighty fish".[30] He spent three days in its belly and was eventually spewed up on dry land where he went about God's business.[31] Because of this, Jonah was seen as a forerunner of Jesus, who having died by crucifixion, spent a time which spanned part of three days in a tomb, and was resurrected on the third day. So, on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Jonah, with the "great fish" beside him and his eyes turned towards God the Creator, represents a "portent" of the Resurrection of Christ. In Vasari's description of the prophets and sibyls he is particularly high in his praise of the portrayal of Isaiah: "Anyone who studies this figure, copied so faithfully from nature, the true mother of the art of painting, will find a beautifully composed work capable of teaching in full measure all the precepts to be followed by a good painter." Section references [5] [2] [32]

104 of 256 105 of 256

[edit] Sibyls

The Persian Sibyl The sibyls were prophetic women who were resident at shrines or temples throughout the Classical World. The five depicted here are each said to have prophesied the birth of Christ. The Cumaean Sibyl, for example, is quoted by Virgil as declaring that "a new progeny of Heaven" would bring about a return of the "Golden Age". This was interpreted as referring to Jesus. In Christian doctrine, Christ came not just to the Jews but also to the Gentiles. It was understood that, prior to the Birth of Christ, God prepared the world for his coming. To this purpose, God used Jews and Gentiles alike. Jesus would not have been born in Bethlehem (where it had been prophesied that his birth would take place),[33] except for the fact that the pagan Roman Emperor Augustus decreed that there should be a census. Likewise, when Jesus was born, the announcement of his birth was made to rich and to poor, to mighty and to humble, to Jew and to Gentile. The wise men or so-called "Magi" who sought out the infant King with precious gifts were pagan foreigners. In the Church of Rome, where there was an increasing interest in the remains of the city's pagan past, where scholars turned from reading Medieval Church Latin to Classical Latin and the philosophies of the Classical world were studied along with the writings of St Augustine, the presence, in the Sistine Chapel of five pagan prophets is not surprising. It is not known why Michelangelo selected the five particular sibyls that were depicted, given that, as with the Minor Prophets, there were ten or twelve possibilities. It is suggested by John O'Malley[2] that the choice was made for a wide geographic coverage, with the sibyls coming from Africa, Asia, Greece and Ionia. Vasari says of the Erythraean sibyl "Many aspects of this figure are of exceptional loveliness: the expression of her face, her headdress and the arrangement of her draperies: and her arms, which are bared, are as beautiful as the rest." Section reference [5] [2] [34]

[edit] Pendentives In each corner of the chapel is a triangular pendentive filling the space between the walls and the arch

105 of 256 106 of 256 of the vault and forming the spandrel above the windows nearest the corners. On these curving shapes Michelangelo has painted four scenes from Biblical stories that are associated with the salvation of the Jewish people. • The Brazen Serpent • The Punishment of Haman • David and Goliath • Judith and Holofernes The first two stories were both seen in Medieval and Renaissance theology as prefiguring the Crucifixion of Jesus. In the story of the Brazen Serpent, the people of Israel become dissatisfied and grumble at God. As punishment they receive a plague of poisonous snakes. God offers the people relief by instructing Moses to make a snake of brass, set up on a pole, the sight of which gives miraculous healing.

The pendentive of the Brazen serpent with its crowded composition was imitated by Mannerist painters. (unrestored state) In the book of Esther it is related that Haman, a public servant, plots to get Esther's husband, the King of Persia, to slay all the Jewish people in his land. The King, who is going over his books during a sleepless night, realises something is amiss. Esther, discovering the plot, denounces Haman and her husband orders his execution on a scaffold he has built. The King's Eunuchs promptly carry this out. The other stories, those of David and Judith, while showing the Salvation of Israel, were both portrayed with great frequency in the art of Florence as they demonstrated the overthrow of tyrants, a popular subject in the Republic. In this image, the shepherd boy, David, has brought down the towering Goliath with his sling, but the giant is alive and is trying to rise as David forces his head down to chop it off. The depiction of Judith and Holofernes has an equally gruesome detail. As Judith loads the enemy's head onto a basket carried by her maid and covers it with a cloth, she is distracted by the limbs of the decapitated body threshing around. There are obvious connections in the design of the Slaying of Holofernes and the Slaying of Haman at the opposite end of the chapel. Although in the Holofernes picture the figures are smaller and the space

106 of 256 107 of 256 less filled, both have the triangular space divided into two zones by a vertical wall, allowing us to see what is happening on both sides of it. There are actually three scenes in the Haman picture because as well as seeing Haman punished, we see him at the table with Esther and the King and get a view of the King on his bed. Mordechai sits on the steps, making a link between the scenes.[8] While the Slaying of Goliath is a relatively simple composition with the two protagonists centrally placed, the only other figures being dimly-seen observers, the Brazen Serpent picture is crowded with figures and separate incidents as the various individuals who have been attacked by snakes struggle and die or turn towards the icon that will save them. This is the most Mannerist of Michelangelo's earlier compositions at the Sistine Chapel, picking up the theme of human distress begun in the Great Flood scene and carrying it forward into the torment of lost souls in the Last Judgement which was later to be painted below.[2]

[edit] Ancestors of Christ

[edit] Subject

The composition is similar to a Flight into Egypt Between the large pendentives that support the vault are windows, six on each side of the chapel. There were two more windows in each end of the chapel, now closed, and those above the High Altar covered by the Last Judgement. Above each window is an arched shaped, referred to as a lunette and above eight of the lunettes at the sides of the chapel are triangular spandrels filling the spaces between the side pendentives and the vault, the other eight lunettes each being below one of the corner pendentives. Michelangelo was commissioned to paint these areas, as part of the work on the ceiling. the structures form visual bridges between the walls and the ceiling, and the figures that are painted on them are midway in size (approximately 2 metres high) between the very large prophets and the much smaller figures of Popes which had been painted to either side of each window in the 15th century. The subject of the pictures is the Genealogy of Christ. Centrally placed above each window is a painted marble tablet with a decorative frame. On each is painted the names of the male line by which Jesus, through his Earthly father, Joseph, is descended

107 of 256 108 of 256 from Abraham, according to the Gospel of Matthew.[35] The arrangement seems a little erratic as one plaque has four names, most have three or two, and two plaques have only one. Moreover, the progression moves from one side of the building to the other, but not consistently. On either side of each plaque and occupying the greater part of each lunette, are figures. In each case they seem to comprise some sort of a family, but it is extremely difficult to determine who the painted characters represent, as they do not coincide closely with the listed names. There are babies in most of the pictures suggesting a parental relationship between the males and females depicted, but not in every case.

The lunette of Jacob and Joseph, the Earthly father of Jesus. The suspicious old man may represent Joseph.[36] There is also an indeterminate relationship between the figures in the spandrels, which are predominantly women with babies, and the lunettes beneath them. Because of the constraints of the triangular shape in each picture the figures are seated on the ground. In six of the eight spandrels the compositions resemble traditional depictions of the Flight into Egypt. Of the two remaining, one shows a woman with shears trimming the neck of a garment she is making while her toddler looks on. The Biblical woman who is recorded as making a new garment for her child is Hannah, the mother of Samuel, whose child went to live in the temple, and indeed, the male figure behind is wearing a distinctive hat that might suggest that of a priest. But the actual identity is unknown, and is possibly associated with the family on the lunette.[37] The other figure who differs from the rest is a young woman who sits staring out of the picture with prophetic intensity. It may be that she represents the Blessed Virgin Mary. Her position is directly above the tablet on which are engraved the name of Jesse of whom it was prophesied "There shall come forth a rod out of the stump of Jesse and a branch shall grow out of his roots".[38] Jesse is in fact the key to understanding the tradition behind these paintings. While the depiction of the Ancestors of Christ in fresco are rare, the subject was a common one in stained glass.[39] It is often shown as a Jesse Tree with Jesse lying prone and a tree growing from his side with the ancestors on each branch.[40] Section References [2] [6] [4]

108 of 256 109 of 256

[edit] Treatment

Detaile of the Eleazar and Mattan lunette The figures in the lunettes appear to be families, but in every case they are families that are divided. The figures in them are physically divided by a name plate but they are also divided by a range of human emotions that turn them outward or in on themselves and sometimes towards their partner with jealousy, suspicion, rage. In them Michelangelo has portrayed the anger and unhappiness of the human condition. Michelangelo uses these families to indicate to the viewer the problems that are inherent to humanity's nature and shows clearly the reason why Humankind was in need of the saviour, Christ Jesus.[41] In their constraining niches, the ancestors "sit, squat and wait".[8] Of the fourteen remaining lunettes, the two that were probably painted first, the families of Eleazar and Mathan and of Jacob and Joseph are the most detailed. They become progressively broader towards the altar end, one of the last being painted in only two days.[42] The Eleazar and Mathan picture has two figures with a wealth of costume detail that is not present in any other lunette. The female to the left has had as much care taken with her clothing as any of the sibyls. Her skirt is turned back showing her linen petticoat and the garter that holds up her mauve stockings and cuts into the flesh. She has a reticule and her dress is laced up under the arms. On the other side of the tablet sits the only male figure among those on the lunettes who is intrinsically beautiful. This blonde young man, elegantly dressed in white shirt and pale green hose, with no jerkin but a red cloak, postures with an insipid and vain gesture, in contrast to the ignudi which he closely resembles. Prior to restoration, of all the paintings in the Sistine Chapel, the lunettes and spandrels were the dirtiest. Added to this, there has always been a problem of poor daytime visibility of the panels nearest the windows because of halination.[43] Consequently, they were the least well known of all Michelangelo's publicly accessible works. The recent restoration has made these masterly studies of human nature and inventive depiction of the human form known once more. Section References [2] [6]

109 of 256 110 of 256

This impassive figure is one of the most reproduced on the ceiling.

[edit] Ignudi The Ignudi[44] are the 20 athletic, nude males that Michelangelo painted as supporting figures at the four corners of the five smaller narrative scenes of central part of the ceiling. The figures hold or are draped with or lean on a variety of things which include pink ribbons, green bolsters and enormous garlands of acorns. The acorns are the symbol of the family of Michelangelo's patron, Pope Julius, and can also be seen as the finials on his chair in Raphael's portrait.[45] The Ignudi, although all seated, are less physically constrained than the Ancestors of Christ. While the pairs of the monochrome male and female figures above the spandrels are mirrors of each other, these ignudi are all different. In the earliest paintings, they are paired, their poses being similar but with variation. These variations become greater with each pair until the postures of final four bear no relation to each other whatsoever. Their painting demonstrates, more than any other figures on the ceiling, Michelangelo's mastery of anatomy and foreshortening and his enormous powers of invention. [46] The meaning of these figures has never been clear. They are certainly in keeping with the Humanist acceptance of the classical Greek view that “the man is the measure of all things”.[47] Their presence and nudity angered a number of critics, including Pope Hadrian VI who described the ceiling as "a stew of naked bodies" and wanted it stripped.[5] But Michelangelo knew the Bible well.[2] He would have been well aware of the fact that although seraphim and cherubim are described as being winged creatures, angels are not. They are described as looking like men.[48] When Michelangelo later painted the altar wall of the chapel, he included a great number of angels, particularly in the lunettes which are decorated with scenes of angels carrying the symbols of the Passion. Other angels are employed sounding the trumpets which call forth the dead, displaying books in which the names of the saved and the damned are written and casting sinners down to Hell. In all, the Last Judgement contains more than forty angels, all closely resembling the ignudi. It is reasonable to conclude that the ignudi represent angels.[49] If the ignudi are indeed angels, they are the ever-present attendants and messengers of God, impassively watching and waiting on the fate of

110 of 256 111 of 256

Humankind.

[edit] Stylistic analysis and artistic legacy

Raphael's Isaiah was painted in imitation of Michelangelo's prophets. Michelangelo was the artistic heir to the great 15th century sculptors and painters of Florence. His learnt his trade first under the direction of a masterly fresco painter, Domenico Ghirlandaio, known for two great fresco cycles in the Sassetti Chapel and Tornabuoni Chapel, and for his contribution to the cycle of paintings on the walls of the Sistine Chapel. As a student Michelangelo studied and drew from the works of the two most renowned Florentine fresco painters of the early Renaissance, Giotto and Masaccio.[50] Masaccio's figures of Adam and Eve being expelled from the Garden of Eden had a profound effect on the depiction of the nude in general, and in particular on the use of the nude figure to convey human emotion. Helen Gardner says that in the hands of Michelangelo "the body is simply the manifestation of the soul, or of a state of mind and character".[50] Michelangelo was also almost certainly influenced by the paintings of Luca Signorelli [50] whose paintings, particularly the Death and Resurrection Cycle in Orvieto Cathedral contain a great number of nudes and inventive figurative compositions. In Bologna, Michelangelo saw the relief sculptures of Jacopo della Quercia around the doors of the cathedral. In Michelangelo's depiction of the Creation of Eve the whole composition, the form of the figures and the relatively conservative concept of the relationship between Eve and her Creator adheres closely to Jacopo's design.[8] Other panels on the ceiling, most particularly the iconic Creation of Adam show "unprecedented invention".[8]

111 of 256 112 of 256

The Deposition by Pontormo. The Mannerist style developed from Michelangelo's painting. The ceiling of the Sistine Chapel was to have a profound effect upon other artists, even before it was completed. Vasari, in his Life of Raphael, tells us that Bramante, who had the keys to the chapel, let Raphael in to examine the paintings in Michelangelo's absence. On seeing Michelangelo's prophets, Raphael went back to the picture of the Prophet Isaiah that he was painting on a column in the Church of Sant'Agostino and, according to Vasari, although it was finished, he scraped it off the wall and repainted it in a much more powerful manner, in imitation of Michelangelo. There was hardly a design element on the ceiling that was not subsequently imitated: the fictive architecture, the muscular anatomy, the foreshortening, the dynamic motion, the luminous colouration, the haunting expressions of the figures in the lunettes, the abundance of putti. Gabriele Bartz and Eberhard König have said of the ignudi, "There is no image that has had a more lasting effect on following generations than this. Henceforth similar figures disported themselves in innumerable decorative works, be they painted, formed in stucco or even sculpted."[8] Within Michelangelo's own work, the chapel ceiling led to the later and more Mannerist painting of the Last Judgement in which the crowded compositions gave full rein to his inventiveness in painting contorted and foreshortened figures expressing despair or jubilation. Among the artists in whose work can be seen the direct influence of Michelangelo are Pontormo, Andrea del Sarto, Correggio, Tintoretto, Annibale Carracci, Paolo Veronese and El Greco. In January 2007, it was claimed that as many as 10,000 visitors passed through the in a day and that the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is the biggest attraction. The Vatican, anxious at the possibility that the newly-restored frescoes will suffer damage, announced plans to reduce visiting hours and raise the price in an attempt to discourage visitors.[51] Five hundred years earlier Vasari had said "The whole world came running when the vault was revealed, and the sight of it was enough to reduce them to stunned silence."[5]

[edit] Quotations Vasari

112 of 256 113 of 256

This painting by Tintoretto shows the influence of the ignudi, this time in female form. “The work has proved a veritable beacon to our art, of inestimable benefit to all painters, restoring light to a world that for centuries had been plunged into darkness. Indeed, painters no longer need to seek for new inventions, novel attitudes, clothed figures, fresh ways of expression, different arrangements, or sublime subjects, for this work contains every perfection possible under those headings.”[5] Waldemar Januszczak The art critic and television producer Waldemar Januszczak wrote that when the Sistine Chapel ceiling was recently cleaned, he "was able to persuade the man at the Vatican who was in charge of Japanese TV access to let me climb the scaffold while the cleaning was in progress." "I sneaked up there a few times. And under the bright, unforgiving lights of television, I was able to encounter the real Michelangelo. I was so close to him I could see the bristles from his brushes caught in the paint; and the mucky thumbprints he’d left along his margins. The first thing that impressed me was his speed. Michelangelo worked at Schumacher pace. Adam’s famous little penis was captured with a single brushstroke: a flick of the wrist, and the first man had his manhood.[52] I also enjoyed his sense of humour, which, from close up, turned out to be refreshingly puerile. If you look closely at the angels who attend the scary prophetess on the Sistine ceiling known as the Cumaean Sibyl, you will see that one of them has stuck his thumb between his fingers in that mysteriously obscene gesture that visiting fans are still treated to today at Italian football matches."[53] Gabriel Bartz and Eberhard König "In a world where all experience was based in the glorious lost past of Antiquity, he made a new beginning. Michelangelo, more even than Raphael or Leonardo, embodies a standard of artistic genius which reveals a radically changed image of human beings and their potential..."[8]

"...witnessing to the beauty of man created by God...", Pope John Paul II.

113 of 256 114 of 256

Pope John Paul II “It seems that Michelangelo, in his own way, allowed himself to be guided by the evocative words of the Book of Genesis which, as regards the creation of the human being, male and female, reveals: "The man and his wife were both naked, yet they felt no shame".[54] The Sistine Chapel is precisely - if one may say so - the sanctuary of the theology of the human body. In witnessing to the beauty of man created by God as male and female, it also expresses in a certain way, the hope of a world transfigured, the world inaugurated by the Risen Christ……”[55] Michelangelo "Whatever beauty here on earth is seen, To meet the longing and perceptive eye, Is semblance of that source divine, From whence we all are come. In this alone we catch a glimpse of Heaven."[56]

[edit] Restoration Main article: Restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes The frescoes of the Sistine Chapel were restored between June 1980 and December 1999, with preliminary tests taking place in 1979. The first stage of restoration, the work upon Michelangelo’s lunettes, was achieved in October 1984. The work then proceeded on the ceiling, completed December 1989 and from there to the Last Judgement. The restoration was unveiled by Pope John Paul II on 8 April, 1994. The restoration team comprised Gianluigi Colalucci, Maurizio Rossi, Piergiorgio Bonetti, Bruno Baratti and others. The final stage was the restoration of the wall frescoes by Botticelli, Ghirlandaio, Perugino and others, This was unveiled on 11 December, 1999.[57] The restoration, which revealed the frescoes in bright pastel colours, was met with both praise and criticism. Those who are critical believe that much original work by Michelangelo was lost in the removal of various accretions.[58]

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

114 of 256 115 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 9 . . . Pg. 115 . . Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction ("WMD") in Iraq that might be used in "Nuclear Crimes' against U.S. targets in the U.S., U.S. Corporation targets in ITALY AND Europe, and used against U.S. Corporation targets located in Italy and Rome. . . . PFC Kristian Menchaca (Died 19 Jun 2006), U.S. Army, was assigned to a U.S. Military operation in Iraq seeking to locate and nullify Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction ("WMD") in

Iraq that might be used in "Nuclear Crimes' against U.S. targets in the U.S., U.S. Corporation targets in Europe, and used against U.S. Corporation targets located in Italy and Rome.

. . .Kristian explained that he was present and observed a U.S. Army interrogation of captured terrorists in Iraq, early 2006. Said Terrorists explained that they were transporting "hot" Uranium ore tailings from Uranium mines in Iran, by truckload, to Iraq for purposes of Radiologically

'stealth' contaminating U.S. Corporations doing business in Middle East countries, and in Europe, in Africa, and USA.

. . . . Since Kristian Menchaca was defending said U.S. Corporation "Nuclear Crime' targets in Italy and Rome and Italy and Rome. Kristian Menchaca was killed while defending said U.S. Corporation

"Nuclear Crime' targets in Italy and Rome and Italy and Rome; and therefore, in Italy and Rome and other Western countries he was defending from Nuclear Crime attack, U.S. Corporation

"Nuclear Crime' targets owed PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker a responsibility to contribute Reward and Ransom efforts to assist in U.S. soldier Prisoner of War survival if he was captured in Iraq.

. . . . Thus, the courts of all Western countries currently facing Nuclear Crimes targeted against

American Business Corporations in their countries have jurisdiction of these issues.

. . . . None of the U.S. corporations in Italy and Rome have ever offered or contributed any surety to compensate the people of Italy and Rome or any Middle East country that could be damaged by

Nuclear Crime attacks against U.S. Corporations in Italy and Rome.

115 of 256 116 of 256

. . . . None of the U.S. corporations in Italy and Rome offered or contributed any Ransom or

Reward money to save the lives of captured U.S. soldiers, when U.S. corporations in Italy and

Rome owed captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War reciprocal efforts by U.S. corporations to pay rewards and ransoms in exchange for U.S. soldier Prisoners of War who were providing "Nuclear-

Crime-defense" of U.S. corporations in Italy and Rome countries.

. . . As a consequence of defending U.S. Corporations from "Nuclear-Crimes" in Italy and Rome,

PFC Kristian Menchaqca and PFC Thomas Tucker were barbarically tortured to death. Middle East countries have jurisdiction over most parts of this litigation by reason of the fact that they would become victims of "Nuclear-Crimes" should the American Corporations inside their countries be

"Nuclear-Crime" attacked on their soil. Most Middle East countries, wherein "U.S. corporations do business, are not at war with enemies of the United States and, therefore would not be Nuclear

Crime targets if there were no U.S. Corporations licensed to do business on the soils of these

Middle East Countries.

The family of Kristian Menchaca seeks 'direct' or 'indirect' compensation from said U.S.

Corporations in Italy and Rome for Kristian Menchaca's death as his death relates to the threat of catastrophic "Nuclear Crimes" against said U.S. Corporations identified as "Nuclear Crime targets" in foreign nations in Italy and Rome, Indonesia, Europe, et.seq..

. . . The family of Kristian Menchaca believes the new U.S. government under Barack Obama will replace most or all those in the Bush administration, including U.S. Attorney General Mukasey, who have behaved like criminals.

Thus, Plaintiffs are willing to litigate this matter in several Middle East countries where U.S.

Corporations have substantial holdings that can be seized by court action. Because of these most contrversial Nuclear Crime issues, the U.S. government may be willing to settle Plaintiff's U.S. court case H-08-60 (Houston) to eliminate the unfavorable public opinion that will develop against the U.S. should this "Nuclear Crime" litigation be pursued in Middle East Courts where Plaintiffs are currently filing Multi-Billion and trillion dollar Crime Claims related to potential U.S.

116 of 256 117 of 256

Corporation "Nuclear-Crime" targets in Middle East countries that represent a very large liklihood of becoming colaterall victims alongside U.S. corporation "Nuclear Crime" targets.

Considering the scope of a full scale Nuclear Contamination attack, we hope all lawfirms who examine this Brief will see that Trillion dollar Qui Tam Claims are most rational on behalf of

Western people exposed to Nuclear Crimes in Italy and Rome countries as the consequence of the most wrongful presence of U.S. Corporations in Italy and Rome who should pay for attracting nuclear Jihad to countries that are "Nuclear Crime" target victims of U.S. corporate presence.

. . . The Kristian Menchaca family must litigate this matter essentially as on a "contingent fee" coming from any settlement to pay Attorneys and, except for Menchaca family paying small court filing fees, is essentially without funds to pay Attorney fees . We seek 'contingent fee' law firms and can only offer contingent fees to come from our lawsuit awards (if any) or offer royalties as might come from the screenplay, Princess and the Sons of Paradise , © 1997, 2004, 2005 if produced as a Motion Picture by investors: http://www.writesafe.com/storage8/CANCOPY_cvrAfAmp_MATT.pdf

. . . My following letter to the prince of monaco explains more. I will send attachments that further explain in following eMails.

Sincerely,

Ken MacKenzie, Complainant & Uncle of Kristian Menchaca

Enclosure: Notification of Attorney General's Office - England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, 20 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0NF , General Inquiries: 020 7271 2492; Fax: 020 7271 2434 E-Mail addresses: All queries: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] TO: [email protected] , [email protected] TO: Prince Albert of Monaco , Tél. : (+377) 98.98.81.14 E-mail : [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , centre- [email protected] , [email protected],

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : APPENDIX 2,

Appendix 3 : International Criminal Court

117 of 256 118 of 256

Claims under art.15 of the Rome Statute may be sent to: International Criminal Court,

Information and Evidence Unit, Office of the Prosecutor, Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The

Hague, The Netherlands, or sent by email to [email protected] , or sent by facsimile to +31 70 515 8555. [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,

. . . NRA. The proceedure being audited was often non-existent, out of date, inadequate, ignored, or inaccurate. Complicating the situation was the fact that management was slow to respond and often failed to respond for months.

APPENDIX 4, X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

...... TO: Prince Albert of Monaco , Les Terrasses de Fontvieille, 23, avenue Albert II - MC 98000

Monaco ; Tél. : (+377) 98.98.81.14 / Fax : (+377) 98.98.40.39; E-mail : [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , centre- [email protected] , [email protected] ; H.E. Gilles Noghès, first Ambassador of the Prince of Monaco to the United States of America , [email protected]

...... TO: Fairmont Monte Carlo, 12 Avenue des Spélugues, Monte Carlo, Monaco, 98000 ; TOLL FREE: 1(888) 270 6650, International Numbers TEL (377) 93 50 65 00, FAX (377) 93 30 01 57, E-MAIL [email protected]

Prince Albert of Monaco, Ladies and Gentlemen:

. . Of question is permanent radiological contamination of Monoco that could be contaminated with

118 of 256 119 of 256

Radiological poison supplied from abandoned "Uranium Open Pit Mines," Radiological poison available as a Radiological weapon source for Nuclear Jihad Terrorists to "Nuclear-Crime" attack any country at anytime:

. . Although, Monoco was not mentioned to U.S. 101st. Airborne Division Military intelligence by

U.S. captured Nuclear Jihad Terrorists in Iraq during 2006, I am currently composing my litigation for submission to European Courts to describe U.S. Corporations in Monoco as targets of

Nuclear Jihad terrorists based on information of interviews of captured Nuclear Terrorists by U.S.

101st. Airborne Military intelligence in Iraq, early 2006 .

. . Whatever can be said of Monaco can also be said of other small countries, such as Vatican, wherein a radiological attack could require the permanent evacuation of the "ENTIRE" country to save lives, the entire country become an uninhabitable Radiological wasteland for centuries.

. . The Vatican covers approximately .5 square miles of territory. Monaco covers .7 square miles of territory. Both are among the world's smallest countries and, therefore, easily Nuclear contaminated from border to border by radiological attack, which would require evacuation of the entire population in each country.

. . I am currently litigating a Geneva Convention War Crime lawsuit, Case H-08-60, in U.S. District

Court, Southern District of Texas, regarding my Nephew, PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and Pfc

Thomas Tucker, both captured by al Shura Nuclear Jihad Terrorists, Iraq, 2006, and barbarically tortured to death.

. . Our court litigative demand is (1) that the U.S. Government pay Billions in damages to the family of Kristian Vasquez Menchaca and (2) provide higher dollar value "Life Rewards" for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War who are treacherously under-valued by the U.S. at $50,000 each while life rewards for terrorists start at five million dollars ($5,000,000 U.S) each at the U.S.

Department of State and U.S. justice Department Web sites.

Prior to his death, while home in Texas, on leave, "$50,000 life-valued PFC Kristian Vasquez

Menchaca" explained he had been previously present, early 2006, at interviews of U.S.-captured

119 of 256 120 of 256

Terrorists who were prisoners of U.S. Forces in Iraq.

. . The captured Terrorists explained they had been moving Nuclear Isotope wastes by the truckload from Uranium excavation mining operations in Iran through Iraq to attack U.S. business corporation targets with lethal radiological waste in Europe and in the U.S., and in the U.K.

. . U.S. corporations in France were mentioned.

. . The U.S. captured "Dirty Bomber," Jose Padilla, described by President Bush, represents this type of Nuclear Jihad bomber.

. . Near Limoges, France, eight hours drive from Monaco, "lethal radioactive Uranium waste" on the ground near the "unguarded" entrance of the abandoned Margnac Uranium/Radium mine-pit is freely available to any Terrorist, who wants to load this deadly Uranium/Radium waste into his automobile, at anytime, and drive it to Monaco for purposes of radiologically attacking Monoco by dumping said "life destroying Uranium waste" on Monaco's streets to lethally contaminate the entire nation of Monaco into a radioactive wasteland, unsafe for human habitation, while ocean winds swirl radioactive dust over every square centimeter of Monaco's entire territory, border-to- border.

. . Monaco is immediately recognizable as an an easy mark and easy victim posing no difficulty for

Terrorists to contaminate with Nuclear Crime attacks delivering deadly, life-destroying, readily obtainable, radioactive Radium from the abandoned Margnac Uranium/Radium, mine-pit, to the streets of Monoco by automobile and thereby destroying Monaco with longterm radioactive contaminants for centuries. Terrorists could decide to Radiologically attack Monoco with nuclear mining wastes for several reasons related to retaliation against U.S. Corporations doing business in Monaco. Or, Terrorists could attack Monaco to respond against those who might be linked to the

Radiological contamination of the Holy St. Peters in Vatican, Italy and Rome.

SEE: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VB2-4BKN19P-

1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&

_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=824f6ac3be8817d7bde137ff1198abf0

120 of 256 121 of 256

. . "Abandoned, 'open pit,' Uranium mines" are also located at the following "Nuclear Crime" attack launching locations: (1) "Abandoned" South Terras Mine with the "HOTTEST 31 %

Uranium/Radium ore" ever discovered, near St. Stephen in Cornwall, England, (2)

"Abandoned" Autunois in France's Massif Central, (3)"Abandoned" Oberpfalz in Bavaria, and

(4) Billingen in Sweden. More "Abandoned, 'open pit,' Uranium mines" with deadly Uranium /

Radium ore deposits are found at (5)"Abandoned" Shinkolobwe Uranium deposits in Katanga,

(6) "Abandoned" Uranium pits in Congo-Kinshasa, (7) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Namibia,

(8) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Nigeria, (9) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Côte d'Ivoire,

(10) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Djibouti, (11) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Egypt, (12) in

Equatorial Guinea, (13) in Czech Republic, and (14) in Romania, also at (15) "Abandoned"

Uranium Pits in Port Radium, near Great Bear Lake, Canada , (16) Uranium in at Beira Province,

Portugal; (17) at Tyuya Muyun, Uzbekistan, and at (18) "Abandoned" Uranium Pits in Radium

Hill, Australia. Uranium in "Abandoned, 'open pit,' Uranium mines" with deadly Uranium /

Radium ore deposits ("Radium" is lethal if inhaled) are everywhere on the Colorado Plateau of

(19) Utah and (20) Colorado. SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_uranium_mines

. . "Abandoned" Uranium Pit "Lethal radioactive Uranium waste" is simply piled on the ground near most of these abandoned open pit mines and at the entrance of the unguarded

Margnac open Pit Uranium mine in France; and, anyone can take it at anytime. It is like shoveling garden dirt into the back of an automobile . . . , very simple.

. . Uranium waste piles present a lethal hazard because of release of bone rotting radioactive dust and radioactive radon gas that could easily be inhaled by victims, and toxic Radium dust, which is nine million times more radioactive than Uranium and destroys lungs.

SEE: http://www.wise-uranium.org/uwai.html , Margnac open Pit Uranium mine near Limoges,

France. Also SEE: http://apps.sipri.org/sipri/stafflist_disp.php ;

Sincerely,

121 of 256 122 of 256

Kenneth MacKenzie

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Appendix 5 of Addresses: http://riviera.angloinfo.com/information/27/monbus.asp Arne Spildo, E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +47 22 24 40 26 Director General Henning Henriksen, E-mail: [email protected] Director General Målfrid Bjærum, eMail:[email protected] Telephone:+47 22 244039 Director General Ingvard Havnen E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: +47 22 24 40 29 [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , #1: Notification of Attorney General for Sweden, http://www.sweden.gov.se/ Lena Stenwall, Deputy Consul General, Sweden, Head of Section, [email protected] To: Noordeinde Palace, [Her Majesty, The Queen], Postbus 30412, 2500 GK Den Haag, The Netherlands [email protected]

To: HRH Prince Turki Al-Faisal Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud; Care of: KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & EVANS, P.L.L.C. 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Sumner Square, Washington, DC 20036-3209 Tel: (202) 326-7900 ; Fax: (202) 326-7999 Counsel for HRH Prince Turki Al-Faisal Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, and The Kingdom of Italy and Rome Mark C. Hansen, Esquire, Kelly P. Dunbar, Esq.: [email protected] , Michael K. Kellogg, Esquire, [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected]

TO: Notification of Attorney General's Office - England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, 20 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0NF , General Inquiries: 020 7271 2492; Fax: 020 7271 2434 E- Mail addresses: All queries: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] TO: Postal Address: Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, Greater London Authority, email: [email protected] , City Hall, The Queen's Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA ; Telephone: 020 7983 4100 Minicom: 020 7983 4458 ; Fax: 020 7983 4057

TO: Matthew W. Friedrich, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division , 950 Pennsylvania Ave. , Washington, D.C. 20530-0001; [email protected] switchb:202-514-2000; http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/links/contact.html ("...advises the Attorney General, Congress, the Office of Management Budget and the White House on matters of criminal law; provides legal advice and assistance to federal prosecutors and investigative agencies; and provides leadership for coordinating international as well as federal, state, and local law enforcement matters...") To: Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, (202) 647- 0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] Defense Attaché Office, US Embassy, 24 Grosvenor Square, London W1A 1AE ; Phone:[44] (0) 20 7894-0723; Fax:[44] (0) 20 7499-7688 ; Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] TO: United States Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 2053 ;US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC - (202) 353-1555 ,

122 of 256 123 of 256

TO: United States Attorney Attorney General Mukasey, Care Of: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Tim Johnson, Houston, P.O. Box 61129, Houston, TX 77208; 8-5 M-F: (713) 718-3310; U.S. Atty. (713) 567-9000 FBI 713-693-5000 ;[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] X X X X X X X X X X X X

APPENDIX 6 of possible addressees: Re: POPE Benedict & U.S. President Bush meeting 16 April 2008 -- WAR CRIME Lawsuits : U.S. & Mexico & Dominican Republic TO: Pope Benedict XVI : [email protected], [email protected] , Editor-in-Chief: GIOVANNI MARIA VIAN, Tipografia Vaticana - Editrice "L'Osservatore Romano" 00120 Vatican City, Tel.: (+39) 06.698.99.390; Fax: (+39) 06.698.83.252; E-mail [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , music@st- dominic-church.org , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] TO: Amnesty International USA, 5 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10001; phone: (212) 807-8400 fax: (212) 627-1451; email: [email protected] TO: Raoul Wallenberg Institute, Stora Gråbrödersg. 17 B, P.O. Box 1155 SE-221 05 Lund, Sweden, Phone: +46 46 222 12 00, Fax: +46 46 222 12 22 Subject: POPE Benedict & U.S. President Bush : WAR CRIME Lawsuit filings : U.S. & Mexico & Dominican Republic To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected]

Appendix 7 of Atrocities: (1) SEE:Video Of Beaheadings Of Americans Kristian Menchaca And Thomas ... (2) SEE:Kristian Menchaca - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (3) SEE: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF- 8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-06,GGLD:en&q=kristian+menchaca+video (4) SEE: http://www.google.com/search?

123 of 256 124 of 256

q=kristian+menchaca+video&hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&start=10&sa=N http://www.monaco-montecarlo.com/index.php?p=fiche&id=1476&lang=en

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Appendix 8, Defendants and Defendant listed from coalition countries: (Set font to 10)

Defendant #1 ExxonMobil (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Jaime Spellings, General Manager, ExxonMobil Oil Corporate Headquarters, 5959 Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving, Texas 75039-2298 , (972) 444-1000; ExxonMobil Oil Indonesia Inc, Wisma GKBI 30th floor, Jl. Jendral Sudirman No. 28, Jakarta 10210, Indonesia; Defendant #2 CALTEX PETROLEUM (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), 125 East John W. Carpenter Freeway, Irving, TX 75062; telephone 214-830-1000; (Caltex Pacific Indonesia, Manager Mr. Harry Bustaman, Corporate Communications, P. O. Box 1158, Room 1620, Jakarta 10011, Indonesia Fax: 343-51289; Defendant #3 Chevron-Texaco, (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), David J. O’Reilly, Headquarters, 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd., San Ramon, CA 94583, U.S.A. Tel. +1-925-842-1000; [email protected];, and others (et.al.), Defendant #4 Atlantic Richfield (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Indonesia, ARCO (Atlantic Richfield Oil Company), 515 S. Flower St., Los Angeles, CA 90071, telephone 213-486-3511; Defendant #5 Conoco Phillips (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Gulf Indonesia Resources, Box 2197, Houston, TX 77252 - 2197; 600 North Dairy Ashford (77079-1175) ; Phone: 281-293-1000 Defendant #6 Halliburton (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), David J. Lesar, 1401 Mckinney St Ste 2400, Houston, TX 77010-4040 http://www.halliburton.com/ Indonesia; Defendant #7 Royal Dutch/Shell (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Managing Director: Jeroen van der Veer ; Group Managing Director and CFO: Peter Voser; Group Chief Information Officer: Michael J. Rose, Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR The Hague, The Netherlands, Phone: +31-70-377-

124 of 256 125 of 256

9111; Fax: +31-70-377-3115) CITICORP partly owns Shell and Scott Paper. Defendant #8 CITICORP (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), VISA, MasterCard, Carte Blanche, and Diners Club, 399 Park Ave, New York NY 10043; telephone 212-559-1000 fax 212-527-3277; CITICORP partly owns Shell and Scott Paper: Defendant #9 DU PONT (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), 1007 Market St., Wilmington, DE 19898, telephone 302-774-1000 ; telephone 800- 441-7111,{C-4 is suitable propelant of U235 in “Gun Type” RA115}.( PT DuPont Indonesia, Name:AGUNG PURNAWAN; Company: PT DuPont Indonesia. Address:Menara Mulia 5th Floor; Jalan Jend. Gatot Soebroto Kav9-11, Jakarta, 12930, Indonesia, Phone:(62 21) 5222555; Fax:(62 21) 5222565 ; Email: [email protected] ; Defendant #10 JP Morgan Chase (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), 270 Park Ave. New York, NY 10017; Phone 212-270-6000 ; (Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd, Jabotabek, Indonesia; (Representatives of all main Saudi Arabian mills) Email : [email protected] ; Customer Service Department (CSD) Telp. 0-800-1-368-368 (Toll Free); [email protected] ; BlueLinx Corporation, 4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30339, 1- 888-502-BLUE, timber company (https://mm.jpmorgan.com/disclosures/company/cmp_index.html#J (doing business in Indonesia with Barito Pacific Timber Tbk. Wisma Barito Pacific, Tower B, 9th Floor Jl. Let. Jend. S. Parman Kav. 62-63 Jakarta 11410 Indonesia Tel. : (62-21) 530 6711; JPMP Asia, now known as CCMP Capital Asia, closed a new fund in 2005. It continues to invest in the Asia/Pacific region and will maintain its affiliation with the buyout professionals of CCMP Capital). Defendant #11 FORD Corporation, (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), American Road, Dearborn MI 48121; telephone 313-322-3000;(Ford Motor Corporation Defendant Ford Motor Indonesia, Ford, Jakarta Barat, Jl. Letjen.S.Parman, Kav.N1, Slipi, Jakarta 11480 – Indonesia; U.S. Corporation: Ford/Mazda Indonesia Manufacturing (MIM) Indonesia Ford Motor Indonesia, 10th Floor, Wisma Indomobil (Indo Mobil Group, Mazda, Minolta, and Sumitomo) , Jl. M.T. Haryono Kav. 8, Jakarta 13530 - INDONESIA (Equity share in Mazda is 33.4% owned by Ford, USA); Ford / MAZDA, 3-1 Shinchi, Fuchu-cho, Aki-gun, Hiroshima 730-91 Japan, telephone 011-81-82-282-1111; MAZDA , 1 Mazda Dr., Flat Rock MI 48134, telephone 313-782-7800; (Ford / MAZDA will be served another Claim & Lawsuit in Japan); Defendant #12 Daimler Chrysler Corporation, (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant”

125 of 256 126 of 256 and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2766, USA ; Phone: +1 248 576 5741 (DaimlerChrysler Indonesia, Sole Agent, Manufacturer & Assembler of DaimlerChrysler products for Indonesia, Address : Jl. Mercedes-Benz Raya, Desa Wanaherang, Gunung Putri, Bogor 16965; Phone : 021- 868 99 350; Fax. : 021- 868 99 103; E-Mail : [email protected]; ) Defendant #13 General Motors Corporation (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), CEO Rick Wagoner, P.O. Box 33170, Detroit, MI 48232-5170 ; General Motors Buana Indonesia (GMBI) Kantor Pusat, Jl. Raya Bekasi Km 27, Bekasi 17132; Telp: 021 884 4837; Fax: 021 884 9325 E-mail: [email protected]; Pusat Bantuan Pelanggan; Telp: 0-800-10-CHEVY (24389) (Toll Free); 021 8895 5103 (Direct); Fax: 021 8895 9341; E-mail: [email protected];) Defendant #14 Coca-Cola Bottling Indonesia (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Jl. Raya Teuku Umar KM. 46 Cibitung Bekasi 17520; Indonesia Tel : +62 21 8832 2222 # 9000 Fax : +62 21 8833 0161 : U.S. Corporation: Board of Directors, The Coca Cola Company, P.O. Box 1734, Atlanta, Georgia, 30301 [email protected] (PT Coca-Cola Bottling Indonesia Jl. Raya Teuku Umar KM. 46 Cibitung Bekasi 17520; Indonesia Tel : +62 21 8832 2222 # 9000 Fax : +62 21 8833 0161) Defendant #15 Altria Group, Inc., (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Corporate Office Location, 120 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA ; Telephone: 1 917 663 4000, Fax: 1 917 663 2167 ; Telephone: 1 917 663 4000, Fax: 1 917 663 2167 (a U.S. Corporation , previously named Philip Morris Companies Inc.; Marlboro Red Hard Pack : Pall Mall Malang ; Pt Java Cigarette, (Contact Person:Mr Doni Widarto, Address:Kapasan Kidul 91, Surabaya, Propinsi Jawa Timur, Indonesia; Telephone:62 815 11636840; Fax:62 815 11636839; Defendant #16 Hilton Hotels Corporation, (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), 40 Wall St 41 Fl, New York, NY 10005-5302 ; Tel: (212) 820- 1700 ( HILTON INTERNATIONAL (HOTEL JAKARTA HILTON INTERNATIONAL , Jalan Gatot Subroto, Jakarta 10002; Contact Persons : Ms. Liza M. San Juan/ Mr. Andreas Gunarso; Phone : +62 21 570 70 20; Fax. : +62 21 570 70 21; http://www.hiltonjakarta.com) D#17 Defendant Marriot Hotels, JW Marriott® Hotel Jakarta, JL. Lingkar Mega Kuningan Kav E 1.2 No 1&2 Jakarta, 12950 Indonesia, Phone: 62 21 57988888, Fax : 62 21 57988833 (a “U.S. Military Industrial Corporation 'Combatant” and “Nuclear Landmine Crime Target”), Jakarta;

126 of 256 127 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

127 of 256 128 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CHAPTER 10 . Pg. 128 LETTERS FROM CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

APPENDIX: (1) Letter from: Supreme Court of the United States Office of the Clerk Washington, DC 20543-001 William K. Suter Clerk of the Court (202) 479-3011 April 2. 2009 Mr. Kenneth MacKenzie

Re: Kenneth MacKenzie, Guadalupe Vasquez, Ceasar Vasquez Menchaca v. United States No. 08-9595

Dear Mr. MacKenzie:

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on December 3, 2008 and placed on the docket April 2, 2009 as No. 08-9595.

A form is enclosed for notifying opposing counsel that the case was docketed.

Sincerely,

William K. Suter, Clerk

128 of 256 129 of 256 by Gail Johnson Case Analyst 2 Enclosures : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : (1) (b) Letter from:

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Kenneth MacKenzie,Guadalupe Vasquez, Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, (Petitioners) v. No. 08-9595

United States (Respondent)

To: ...... Counsel for Respondent:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Rule 12.3 that a petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed in the Supreme Court of the United States on December 3, 2008 and placed on the docket April 2,2009. Pursuant to Rule 15.3, the due date for a brief in opposition is Monday, May 04, 2009. If the due date is a Saturday, Sunday, or federal legal holiday, the brief is due on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or federal legal holiday.

Unless the Solicitor General Of The United States represents the respondent, a waiver form is enclosed and should be sent to the clerk only in the event you do not intend to file a response to the petition.

Only counsel of record will receive notification of the court's action in this case. Counsel of record must be a member of the bar of this court.

Mr. Kenneth MacKenzie

129 of 256 130 of 256

Note: This notice is for notification purposes only, and neither the original nor a copy should be filed in the Supreme Court. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

08-9595

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON, DC 20543-001

(1) Kenneth MacKenzie, appearing Properia Persona as Plaintiff “Pro Se” appearing on his own behalf with family class members similarly situated, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, as Plaintiff, Aunt of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca (sister of Claimant Guadalupe Vasquez), (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, as Plaintiff, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, Mother of (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, as Plaintiff, Brother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, family class members similarly situated — PETITIONERS

Class Action regarding: (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims

Vs. Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States — RESPONDENT(S) ------ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

130 of 256 131 of 256

TO U.S. Court Of Appeal For the Fifth Circuit ------PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Kenneth MacKenzie (Uncle of PFC Kristian Menchaca) and Cesar Menchaca (brother of PFC Kristian Menchaca),

------IV. QUESTION(S) PRESENTED OF ISSUE:

QUESTION (1). This matter presents several U.S. Constitutional questions to this U.S.

Supreme Court:

There exists a conflict between the decision of District Court and a prior decision of the

U.S. Supreme Court which allowed waiver of filing fee in Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S.

371 (1971)}; therefore, review is sought on Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971)} precedent of filing fee of U.S. District Court Case H-08-60, Houston, Texas, filed by indigent Plaintiff family victims who ought not be required to pay filing fee to pursue litigation of Terrorist War crimes against U.S. veteran and his family when family is suing Terrorists in U.S. Courts.

Comparatively, there is no filing fee required of veteran's family to file U.S. form 95

Administrative Claim on same issue with Executive Branch as an Administrative Tort

Claim and no fee should be charged by the U.S. Court to resolve issues filed as

Administrative Claims against the government in the Judicial Branch, especially when

War Crimes have been consummated..

Thus, the courts applying doctrine of fairness ought not charge a filing fee when the

Executive Branch does not charge . Furthermore, as this U.S. District Court Case H-08-

131 of 256 132 of 256

60 complains of War Crime violations of the Geneva Conventions, there should be no filing fee demanded in such Geneva Convention Complaint matters before a U.S. Court, the U.S. being signatory to Geneva Conventions.

QUESTION (2). Moreover, regarding Geneva Conventions prohibiting War Crimes of

Mutilation, Torture, Murder of Prisoners of War: Plaintiffs complain that there are disagreements among lower courts about specific legal questions relating to U.S. Court

Filing Fees for the indigent family of Terrorist tortured and murdered U.S. veteran,

Kristian menchaca, tortured to death in iraq, 2006, with PFC Thomas Tucker, both victims of War Crimes prohibited against Prisoners of War by Geneva Conventions . A

United States required court filing fee interferes with filing of lawsuits of Geneva

Convention War Crime questions for which no filing fee is described as required or provisioned in the Geneva Conventions, which if specified according to the political cunning of a U.S. Court judge would thwart and limit court hearings on violations of

Geneva Conventions thereby making them meaningless.

Indigent War Crime Victim Families of Terrorism War Crimes against one of their family members should not be required to pay court filing fees and not treated with less court access in U.S. Courts than War crime victims of Hitler's Third Reich.

War Crime Victim Families of Terrorism War Crimes against a U.S. soldier family member should be able to file lawsuits in U.S. Courts to seek compensation in War Crime litigation and should not be denied court access by by U.S. Court rules to thwart the

Geneva Conventions and not be denied court access by contrived "Limitations of Actions"

132 of 256 133 of 256 and not treated with less court access than War crime victims of Hitler's Third Reich when seeking access to U.S. courts on Complaints of War Crimes perpetrated in the Iraq

War.

Indigent family of 'Terrorist-tortured-to-death' U.S. soldier / veteran victim of Geneva

Convention prohibited War Crimes should not be required to pay U.S. Court filing fee to litigate Geneva Convention War Crime issues in U.S. Courts any more than the U.S.

Courts would charge a Jewish victim of Hitler's Third Reich in a War Crime Case!

Therefore, the U.S. District Court's demand for Court filing fees against Plaintiffs and denial of Plaintiff's filing of this Court Action without payment of fees is also a violation of U.S. laws prohibiting racial discrimination.

Moreover, there are no limitations of Actions imposed within the Geneva Conventions and therefore judge-imposed time limitations for the filing of papers in Geneva

Convention War Crime litigation should not be created outside the Geneva Conventions to thwart and nullify the Geneva Conventions and thwart litigation against those who have clearly violated and claimed (Abu al Masri Islamic al Shura Council) to have violated the Geneva Conventions against terrorist captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War:

U.S. Army PFC Kristian Menchaca, PFC Thomas Tucker, PFC Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith

Maupin, PFC Byron Fouty, Spec. Alex Jimenez .

QUESTION (3): Plaintiff did not receive the U.S. District Court Clerk's 'insecure regular

U.S. mail' Notice of U.S. District Judge Gray Miller's "25 Feb 2008 Denial of Forma

Pauperis," whatsoever.

133 of 256 134 of 256

Court Clerk's notification of of U.S. District Judge Gray Miller's "25 Feb 2008 Denial of

Forma Pauperis," to Petitioner/Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail was deficient in U.S. mail security, was never delivered to Plaintiffs and therefore insufficient to commence time tolling, which should not commence as Plaintiffs never received U.S. District Judge Gray

Miller's "25 Feb 2008 Denial of Forma Pauperis," in the mail as it was not sent or delivered by certified U.S. mail:

1. The first reason time tolling should not commence is that a lawsuit of Geneva

Convention War Crimes has "no limitations of actions," including time within which to file complaint or court papers, which if specified would thwart and limit and deny the

Geneva Conventions regarding Geneva Convention War Crime violations of Geneva

Conventions of which U.S. is signatory and ratifier.

2. Moreover, the U.S. District Court Clerk, Southern District of Texas, did not notify

Plaintiffs by verifiable "certified mail service" of U.S. Court decision to deny Pauperis as described in court's own rules requiring litigants to establish proof of "mail-service." Such

U.S. District Court manipulation is dishonest and trivializes the Geneva Conventions.

Court Clerk U.S.-mailed-Notice of decision to deny Pauperis to sidewalk mail box was deficient in security compared to certified mail with signed receipt as required in Court's own mailing rules to achieve service.

U.S. Judge Gray Miller manipulated all of these events after usurping jurisdiction of this

U.S. Case H-08-60 in violation of 28 USC, Section 455.

Miller was fully informed that this U.S. Case H-08-60 sought U.S. Fourteenth

134 of 256 135 of 256

Amendment parity, sufficiency, and equality to raise upward and increase U.S. $25,000

Rewards for the lives of Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to be at least equal to

U.S. Mega one Million to Twenty Five Million Dollar Rewards offered to save their

Terrorist executioners who were torturing said Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to death while benefitting from the life-saving contrivance of said mega million dollar rewards while said Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were denied by Miller the

Fourteenth amendment equality of mega million rewards to be life-value-equal to the very same enemies who tortured them to death.

Instead, terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- U.S. Army PFC Kristian

Menchaca, PFC Thomas Tucker, PFC Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin, PFC Byron

Fouty, Spec. Alex Jimenez -- were cursed with said U.S. $25,000 Rewards that caused them to be tortured to death and murdered in Iraq.

QUESTION (4): The reward life values assigned for terrorist Captured U.S. soldier

Prisoners of War -- U.S. Army PFC Kristian Menchaca, PFC Thomas Tucker, PFC Joseph

Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin, PFC Byron Fouty, Spec. Alex Jimenez -- should never be lower than the reward life values for Captured enemy terrorist soldier Prisoners of War.

It is a guarantee of torture and death for Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to be reward life valued at less than Captured enemy terrorist soldier Prisoners of War.

Insufficient U.S. $50,000 Reward life values assigned for Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War do discourage enlistment into the U.S. armed services when the american people discover that their government devalues and thereby defames, slanders, and libels their

135 of 256 136 of 256 lives as "American Untermenchen" enlisted Soldiers -- Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of

War -- at 20 to 500 times less Reward Life Value than captured enemy terrorist Prisoners of War, thereby causing torture and death to be inflicted on Captured U.S. soldier

Prisoners of War whose life value is comparatively demonstrated as $25,000

"Untermenchen 'UnderTrash.'"

And, when the american people discover that "All" one hundred percent of Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Reward life valued at $50,000 in Iraq have been barbarically tortured to death in Iraq, U.S. Military enlistment rates will go down further.

Moreover, virtually all 100% of Captured enemy terrorist soldier Prisoners of War -

Terrorists -- survived their capture in Iraq, maintained alive, because they were life valued at one Million to twenty five Million dollars for Reward purposes -- from 20 to 500 times more than Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War .

Of importance to the public-- "We-The-People" -- is that related primary question of U.S.

""Fifty Thousand Dollar 'Reward life-values' " published, proclaimed, and offered for recovery of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to be "NOT-LESS-THAN-Fourteenth-

Amendment -EQUAL" to U.S. Published, Proclaimed, and Offered "One-to-Twenty-Five-

Million-Dollar" Reward life value Protection provided for "Mega-Million-Dollar" Jihad

Terrorists, virtually all one hundred percent saved alive, who are higher reward-life valued up to five hundred times more by U.S. Executive Branch than "Fourteenth-

Amendment-Equality-DENIED 'Fifty Thousand Dollar'" U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in

Iraq and in Afghanistan War theaters during War, thereby "Fifty Thousand Dollar"

136 of 256 137 of 256

Rewards are inflicting Death on "ALL" U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq and

Afghanistan, "ALL" one hundred percent who have been captured have been tortured to death on said "Fifty Thousand Dollar" Rewards.

The Reward life values for Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War could be increased and reward life valued at higher amounts while reward life values for Captured enemy terrorist soldier Prisoners of War can be lowered until both are equal and equality is achieved.

V. List of Parties On the page provided, check either the box indicating that the names of all parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page or the box indicating that there are additional parties. If there are additional parties, list them. Rule 12.6 states that all parties to the proceeding whose judgment is sought to be reviewed shall be deemed parties in this Court, and that all parties other than petitioner shall be respondents. The court whose judgment you seek to have this Court review is not a party. Defendant U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General

VI. Table of Contents SEE Page 35 On the page provided, list the page numbers on which the required portions of the petition appear. Number the pages consecutively, beginning with the “Opinions Below” page as page 1.

VII. Index of Appendices List the description of each document that is included in the appendix beside the appropriate appendix letter. Mark the bottom of the first page of each appendix with the appropriate designation, e.g., “Appendix A.” See Rule 14.1 pertaining to the items to be included in the appendix.

VII. Index of Appendices

A. Federal Courts If you are asking the Court to review a decision of a federal court, the decision

137 of 256 138 of 256 of the United States court of appeals should be designated Appendix A. decision of the United States court of appeals should be designated Appendix A.

Appendix A should be followed by the decision of the United States District Court and the findings and recommendations of the United States magistrate judge, if there were any. If the United States court of appeals denied a timely filed petition for rehearing, a copy of that order should be appended next.

If you are seeking review of a decision in a habeas case, and the decision of either the United States District Court or the United States Court of Appeals makes reference to a state court decision in which you were a party, a copy of the state court decision must be included in the appendix.

B. State Courts If you are asking the Court to review a decision of a state court, the decision of which review is sought should be designated Appendix A.

Appendix A should be followed by the decision of the lower court or agency that was reviewed in the decision designated Appendix A. If the highest court of the state in which a decision could be had denied discretionary review, a copy of that order should follow. If an order denying a timely filed petition for rehearing starts the running of the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 13.3, a copy of the order should be appended next.

As an example, if the state trial court ruled against you, the intermediate court of appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court, the state supreme court denied discretionary review and then denied a timely petition for rehearing, the appendices should appear in the following order:

Appendix A. decision of the United States Court of Appeals

Decision of State Court of Appeals Appendix B Decision of State Trial Court Appendix C Decision of State Supreme Court Denying Review Appendix D Order of State Supreme Court Denying Rehearing

VIII. Table of Authorities On the page provided, list the cases, statutes, treatises, and articles that are referenced: Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971)}

138 of 256 139 of 256

On the page provided, list the cases, statutes, treatises, and articles that are referenced: Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV), of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims,

The page number of petition where each authority appears: Pages. 1 , 2, 6, 8, 9,

10, 12, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 27, 28, 35, 38, 41 , 49, 51 , 77-81 , 83-86,

89, 90, 95-98, 166-168, 169-172, 174-179, 181-183, 185-189, 193-195, 197, 198, 200-

207, 211-213, 215-217, 235-237, 238, 240-246, 250-258, 261-264, 266, 268, 269,

270, 274-279, 281-284, 287-312, 318, 323-328.

On the page provided, list the cases, statutes, treatises, and articles that are referenced: U.S. RICO Act, USC Title 18, Section 1961, et.seq.

The page number of petition where each authority appears: Pgs. 1 , 7, 10, 49, 51 , 54, 57,

61, 63, 66, 70 , 72 114, 169-172, 174-179, 181-183, 115-129, 133-139, 142-143, 146, 150,

153,154, 159, 160, 162, 200, 203, 221-229, 200-207, 211-213, 215-217, 235-237, 238, 240,

230-233, 237, 241-242, 246, 247, 249, 256-258, 271, 284, 295, 296, 301, 304, 313, 332, 338-

341

IX. Opinions Below In the space provided, indicate whether the opinions of the lower courts in your case have been published, and if so, the citation for the opinion below. For example, opinions of the United States courts of appeals are published in the Federal Reporter. If the opinion in your case appears at page 100 of volume 30 of the Federal Reporter, Third Series, indicate that the opinion is reported at 30 F. 3d 100. If the opinion has been designated for publication but has not yet been published, check the appropriate space. Also indicate where in the appendix each decision, reported or unreported, appears.

Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971)}

X. Jurisdiction The purpose of the jurisdiction section of the petition is to establish the statutory source for the Court’s jurisdiction and the dates that determine whether the petition is timely filed.

139 of 256 140 of 256

.1. PRELIMINARY SHORT, PLAIN STATEMENT OF WHY THE COURT HAS

JURISDICTION AND VENUE: There are multiple causes of action and jurisdictions in this matter. This U.S. court has jurisdiction of this matter under Geneva Conventions (I,

III, IV), 12 August, 1949, And Geneva Convention Protocols I And II, Of 08 June 1977, to which the U.S. is signatory, relative To Terrorist-captured U.S. Soldiers who are

“Prisoners Of War” and has jurisdiction of U.S. reward money in the U.S. Treasury to be paid for captured U.S. Soldiers and paid for captured Terrorists and terrorists “at large” during wartime; this U.S. court has jurisdiction under the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, 28 U.S.C. § 1350: The Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, which provides a cause of action for damages to anyone - aliens and citizens alike - who suffered torture anywhere in the world at the hands of any individual acting under the law of any foreign nation. 28 U.S.C. § 1350 note: The Torture Victim Act does not contain its own jurisdictional provision. But, it is clear that any case brought pursuant to that statute would arise under federal law and thus come within 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the grant of general federal question jurisdiction; this U.S. court has jurisdiction under (1) Federal

Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. Sections 1346, 2671-80, and under 28 USC, Section

1391, Where Plaintiff Resides; Under 18 USC, Section 1964 - Civil remedies, 18 USC,

Section 1965 - Venue and process; under (2) USC Title 18, Part I, Chapter 96,

Section 1961, et.seq., RICO Act, Section 1964, Civil remedies, et.seq., under (3) Any act that is indictable under any provision listed in TITLE 18, Section 2332b (g)(5)(B), under

(4) Title 18 USC, Sectiion 2339A. Providing material support to terrorists, under (5) Title

140 of 256 141 of 256

28 U.S.C., Section 1331. Federal question; under (6) Title 42, Section 1983; under (7) Title

28 U.S.C., Section 1350. Alien's action for tort; under (8) 28 U.S.C., Section 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty; JURISDICTION AND

VENUE UNDER TITLE 18, SECTION 2334:(a) General Venue. - Any civil action under section 2333 of this title against any person may be instituted in the district court of the

United States for any district where any plaintiff resides or where any defendant resides or is served, or has an agent. Process in such a civil action may be served in any district where the defendant resides, is found, or has an agent. (b) Special Maritime or Territorial

Jurisdiction. - If the actions giving rise to the claim occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, as defined in section 7 of this title, then any civil action under section 2333 of this title against any person may be instituted in the district court of the United States for any district in which any plaintiff resides or the defendant resides, is served, or has an agent. (c) Service on Witnesses. - A witness in a civil action brought under section 2333 of this title may be served in any other district where the defendant resides, is found, or has an agent. (d) Convenience of the Forum. -

The district court shall not dismiss any action brought under section 2333 of this title on the grounds of the inconvenience or inappropriateness of the forum chosen, unless - (1) the action may be maintained in a foreign court that has jurisdiction over the subject matter and over all the defendants; (2) that foreign court is significantly more convenient and appropriate; and (3) that foreign court offers a remedy which is substantially the same as the one available in the courts of the United States. U.S. Court Jurisdiction exists under Geneva Convention (I), Geneva Convention (III), Geneva Convention (IV);

141 of 256 142 of 256 and, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, (Protocol I), 8

June 1977; and, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949,

(Protocol II), 8 June 1977.

.2. A STATEMENT OF THE CLAIM THAT ENTITLES THE PLAINTIFF TO RELIEF,

INCLUDING A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS: Defendant’s deliberately wrongful acts and negligence caused the death of Kristian Menchaca, a son of Plaintiff

Guadalupe Vasquez, brother of Plaintiff Ceasar Menchaca, nephew of Julieta Vasquez

(sister of Guadalupe Vasquez) and Kenneth MacKenzie. During the time frame of June-

2006, while, at the same time as said United States Code Title 1 money was paid out of the U.S. Treasury on behalf of Terrorists, said members of the same U.S. Life-reward protected al Shura and al Queda Terrorist Organizations, life-protected by U.S. multi million dollar reward money offered by Defendant Attorney General Gonzales, by U.S.

Executive Branch, and offered by Interested Party #1, Secretary of State Rice, were in- progress torture-murdering United States Soldiers who said Terrorists had captured in

Yosifiya, Iraq, (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25, who, during this same time of June 2006, were treasonably denied by Defendant Attorney

General Gonzales and U.S. Executive Branch the equal life-saving treatment of said

United States `Counterterrorism Funds' in the area of Yosifiya, Iraq, during June 2006.

As a consequence, (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25, were tortured to death by reason of being assigned said “$50,000 Death Rewards” and simultaneously denied rewards equal to the $25 million dollar rewards proclaimed by

142 of 256 143 of 256

Defendants to save the lives of the same Terrorist who savagely tortured (1) Pfc. Kristian

Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25 as a result of Defendants’ denial of equal rewards on their behalf. If (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker,

25 had been life-valued at $25 Million equal to Bin-Ladin, equal to Hussein, and equal to other terrorists listed at the U.S. “Rewards For Justice” web site, their chances of survival would have been equal to that of Terrorists. Instead Defendant Gonzales, and

Interested Party U.S. Executive Branch and Interested Parties Rice-Rumsfeld assigned a paltry life value of $50,000 for each of terrorist-captured U.S. Soldiers’ lives while paying out mega million dollar rewards for terrorist lives that they valued at higher dollar amounts than for (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25. This behavior is obviously a violation of said RICO Act proscribed crime predicates

The form sets out the pertinent statutes for federal and state cases. You need provide only the dates of the lower court decisions that establish the timeliness of the petition for a writ of certiorari. If an extension of time within which to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted, you must provide the requested information pertaining to the extension. If you seek to have the Court review a decision of a state court, you must provide the date the highest state court decided your case, either by ruling on the merits or denying discretionary review.

U.S. District Court lower court decision, 25 Feb 2008: Forma Pauperis denied.

XI. Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved Set out verbatim the constitutional provisions, treaties, statutes, ordinances and regulations involved in the case. If the provisions involved are lengthy, provide their citation and indicate where in the Appendix to the petition the text of the provisions appears.

United States Constitution , Amendment 14 - "1. All persons born or naturalized in the

143 of 256 144 of 256

United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Cited in U.S. Case H-08-

60 at Pgs. 28-31, 49, 69 , 99, 107, 112, 113 , 115, 119 , 155, 157 , 187, 188, 196, 201, 202-

204 ,207 , 242 , 244 , 256 ,258 ,263 ,264 ,283 , 295 ,305 ,348 ,350.

XII. Statement of the Case Provide a concise statement of the case containing the facts material to the consideration of the question(s) presented; you should summarize the relevant facts of the case and the proceedings that took place in the lower courts. You may need to attach additional pages, but the statement should be concise and limited to the relevant facts of the case.

1. PRELIMINARY SHORT, PLAIN STATEMENT OF WHY THE COURT HAS

JURISDICTION AND VENUE: There are multiple causes of action and jurisdictions in this matter. This U.S. court has jurisdiction of this matter under Geneva Conventions (I,

III, IV), 12 August, 1949, And Geneva Convention Protocols I And II, Of 08 June 1977, to which the U.S. is signatory, relative to Terrorist-captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War who were Terrorist captured “U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War ” tortured to death by

Terrorist captors as a consequence of U.S. insufficient and unequal life Reward offers of

$50,000 that were deliuberately kept insufficient to make display examples of “U.S.

Soldier Prisoners of War ” who U.S. Attorney General Gonzales knew would be put to death as a consequence of deliberately low and insufficient $50,000 Rewards to prove the

144 of 256 145 of 256

U.S. does not deal with Terrorists.

The U.S. Attorney General has jurisdiction of U.S. reward money in the U.S. Treasury to be paid for captured U.S. Soldiers and paid for captured Terrorists and terrorists “at large” during wartime; this U.S. court has jurisdiction under the Torture Victim

Protection Act of 1991, 28 U.S.C. § 1350: The Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, which provides a cause of action for damages to anyone - aliens and citizens alike - who suffered torture anywhere in the world at the hands of any individual acting under the law of any foreign nation. 28 U.S.C. § 1350 note: The Torture Victim Act does not contain its own jurisdictional provision. But, it is clear that any case brought pursuant to that statute would arise under federal law and thus come within 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the grant of general federal question jurisdiction; this U.S. court has jurisdiction under (1) Federal

Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. Sections 1346, 2671-80, and under 28 USC, Section

1391, Where Plaintiff Resides; Under 18 USC, Section 1964 - Civil remedies, 18 USC,

Section 1965 - Venue and process; under (2) USC Title 18, Part I, Chapter 96,

Section 1961, et.seq., RICO Act, Section 1964, Civil remedies, et.seq., under (3) Any act that is indictable under any provision listed in TITLE 18, Section 2332b (g)(5)(B), under

(4) Title 18 USC, Sectiion 2339A. Providing material support to terrorists, under (5) Title

28 U.S.C., Section 1331. Federal question; under (6) Title 42, Section 1983; under (7) Title

28 U.S.C., Section 1350. Alien's action for tort; under (8) 28 U.S.C., Section 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE UNDER TITLE 18, SECTION 2334:(a) General Venue. -

145 of 256 146 of 256

Any civil action under section 2333 of this title against any person may be instituted in the district court of the United States for any district where any plaintiff resides or where any defendant resides or is served, or has an agent.

Convenience of the Forum. - The district court shall not dismiss any action brought under section 2333 of this title on the grounds of the inconvenience or inappropriateness of the forum chosen, unless - (1) the action may be maintained in a foreign court that has jurisdiction over the subject matter and over all the defendants; (2) that foreign court is significantly more convenient and appropriate; and (3) that foreign court offers a remedy which is substantially the same as the one available in the courts of the United States.

U.S. Court Jurisdiction exists under Geneva Convention (I), Geneva Convention (III),

Geneva Convention (IV); and, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12

August 1949, (Protocol I), 8 June 1977; and, Protocol Additional to the Geneva

Conventions of 12 August 1949, (Protocol II), 8 June 1977.

.2. A STATEMENT OF THE CLAIM THAT ENTITLES THE PLAINTIFF TO RELIEF,

INCLUDING A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS: Defendant’s deliberately wrongful acts and negligence caused the death of Kristian Menchaca, a son of Plaintiff

Guadalupe Vasquez, brother of Plaintiff Ceasar Menchaca, nephew of Julieta Vasquez

(sister of Guadalupe Vasquez) and Kenneth MacKenzie. During the time frame of June-

2006, while, at the same time as said United States Code Title 1 money was paid out of the U.S. Treasury on behalf of Terrorists, said members of the same U.S. Life-reward protected al Shura and al Queda Terrorist Organizations, life-protected by U.S. multi

146 of 256 147 of 256 million dollar reward money offered by Defendant Attorney General Gonzales, U.S.

Executive Branch, and offered by Interested Party #1, Secretary of State Rice, were in- progress torture-murdering United States Soldiers who said Terrorists had captured in

Yosifiya, Iraq, (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25, who, during this same time of June 2006, were treasonably denied by Defendant Attorney

General Gonzales and U.S. Executive Branch the equal life-saving treatment of said

United States `Counterterrorism Funds' in the area of Yosifiya, Iraq, during June 2006.

As a consequence, (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25, were tortured to death by reason of being assigned said “$50,000 Death Rewards” and simultaneously denied rewards equal to the $25 million dollar rewards proclaimed by

Defendants to save the lives of the same Terrorist who savagely tortured (1) Pfc. Kristian

Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25 as a result of Defendants’ denial of equal rewards on their behalf. If (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker,

25 had been life-valued at $25 Million equal to Bin-Ladin, equal to Hussein, and equal to other terrorists listed at the U.S. “Rewards For Justice” web site, their chances of survival would have been equal to that of Terrorists. Instead Defendant Gonzales, and

Interested Party U.S. Executive Branch and Interested Parties Rice-Rumsfeld assigned a paltry life value of $50,000 for each of terrorist-captured U.S. Soldiers’ lives while paying out mega million dollar rewards for terrorist lives that they valued at higher dollar amounts than for (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25. This behavior is obviously a violation of said RICO Act proscribed crime predicates and is a

147 of 256 148 of 256 violation of Geneva Convention III

Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to relief and payment of damages under provision of the

United States RICO Act and USC Title 18, Section 2381 – Treason, and is in violation of other provisions of United States laws. Once life-valued after capture to virtual worthlessness, (1) Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, and (2) Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25 had no chance to survive capture alive. In truth, their chances were less than zero of surviving after Defendant Gonzales, and Interested Party U.S. Executive Branch and Interested

Parties Rice-Rumsfeld assigned a low life-value $50,000 “Death-Sentence” ‘Reward’ for each of their lives.

.3. TORTS AGAINST THE VASQUEZ FAMILY: the doctrine of "the thing speaks for itself" (Res ipsa loquitur) applies. USC Title 18, § 3071 – “Information for which rewards authorized“ and USC Title 18, Section 3072 - Determination of entitlement; maximum amount; Presidential approval; conclusiveness - The Attorney General shall determine whether an individual furnishing information described in section 3071 is entitled to a reward and the amount to be paid.

TITLE 22, § 2708 – “Department of State rewards program” indicate that both Attorney

General Gonzales and Secretary of State Rice are responsible for assigning said larger preferential reward amounts for terrorists. USC Title 18, § 3071 – “Information for which rewards authorized“- and TITLE 22, § 2708 – “Department of State rewards program” indicate said underfunded $50,000 rewards offered for the safety of captured U.S, soldiers during war time treacherously discriminated unto death against U.S. soldiers, during

148 of 256 149 of 256 wartime. Both USC Title 18, § 3071 and TITLE 22, § 2708 provide that “the rewards program shall be administered by the Secretary of State, in consultation, as appropriate, with the Attorney General...” Defendant Attorney General Gonzales and U.S. Executive

Branch and U.S. Secretary of State Rice, and Secretaries of Defense Rumsfeld and Gates do not have ministerial scope or authority under U.S. laws or under Geneva Conventions to issue any proclamation of “Fifty Thousand Dollar ($50,000) Death Reward

Proclamations” after U.S. Soldiers have laid down their arms when captured by

Terrorists and are under the the provisions of the Geneva Conventions

.4. “Twenty-Five-Million-Mega-Dollar-Life-Rewards” advertised and paid by the United

States of America to save captured terrorist lives have consistently proven to save the lives of captured terrorists at “one hundred per cent of the time.” However, said “Fifty-

Thousand-Low-Dollar-Death-Rewards” consistently have proven to cause death for the soldiers of the United States of America at “one hundred per cent of the time.”

.5. When these two profoundly contrasting conditions of “’Life’ and ‘Death’ Rewards are examined alongside the Geneva Conventions (I, III, IV) of 12 August 1949, ARTICLE 3 &

ARTICLE 11, and Geneva Convention Protocol I, ARTICLE 11 and Protocol II, of 08 June

1977,

Defendants’ proclaimed “Fifty Thousand Dollar ($50,000) Reward,” for captured U.S. soldiers, when observed in reality alongside Defendants’ proclaimed “Twenty Five Million

Dollar Rewards” offered at the same time frame for and on behalf of terrorists, was deliberately so insignificant and was so manipulatively low-level that it is immediately

149 of 256 150 of 256 seen as a symbolic “Token-Reward” that, in its final truthful interpretation by all who perceived it, operated as more of an actual “$50,000 Death Sentence” (SEE: Geneva

Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War; August 12, 1949 : Part 1,

ARTICLE 2; ARTICLE 3, “…(a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture”; “(d) the passing of sentences…”) than of anything else. Said “Fifty Thousand Dollar Reward” ($50,000) was obviously not proclaimed to save the lives of the U.S. Soldiers it identified while Defendants proclaimed

“Twenty Five Million Dollar Rewards” offered and paid out $77 million dollars in Reward money, in the same time frame, for and on behalf of terrorists.

.6. TORTS REGARDING WRONGFUL BREACH OF U.S. MILITARY CONTRACT: at the point of voluntary enlistment into the U.S. Military forces under a written contract, enlistees, most who are U.S. Citizens, are not forewarned by U.S. Military Enlistment

Recruiters of the United States Military Forces that after enlistment, if Volunteer U.S.

Soldiers are captured by terrorists, their lives are evaluated by the U.S. Executive

Branch at five hundred times less for “Reward” to be paid for their living recovery at Fifty

Thousand dollars each, than the Terrorist enemies of the United States whose lives are evaluated by the U.S. Executive Branch at five hundred times more for “Reward” to be paid for their living recovery at Twenty Five Million Dollars ($25,000,000) each, who said

Volunteer U.S. Soldiers are fighting against in Iraq and Afghanistan.

.7. TORTS REGARDING WRONGFUL BREACH OF U.S. MILITARY CONTRACT AND

NEGLIGENCE, FOR WHICH A CIVIL SUIT CAN BE BROUGHT: enlistees, most who

150 of 256 151 of 256 are U.S. Citizens, are not forewarned by U.S. Military Enlistment Recruiters of the

United States Military Forces that after enlistment, if Volunteer U.S. Soldiers are captured by terrorists, only five hundred times less “Reward” will be offered by the U.S.

Defense Department for their living recovery at Fifty Thousand dollars ($50,000) each, this $50,000 is five hundred times less than Terrorists are U.S. life-valued at Twenty five

Million Dollars ($25,000,000) each for Rewards. Due to the fact that U.S. soldiers lives are “unexpectedly” life-under-valued by their government at five hundred times less

“Reward” ($50,000) than Terrorist enemies of the United States are highly life valued for

Rewards of Twenty Five Million Dollars ($25,000,000), all said captured U.S. Soldiers in

Iraq have been recovered by the United States Military in a tortured-to-death condition because of said “unexpectedly” low $50,000 rewards; and, those whose bodies have not been recovered have been videoed by terrorists while they were murdered as represented in Terrorist murder videos.

.8. Thus, the U.S. Executive Branch, in its “unexpected” breach of U.S. Military Contract, has unreasonably breached a duty of care for the interests of Terrorist-captured United

States Soldiers held as “Prisoners of War” in Iraq by not forewarning them at enlistment of the manipulated “Death Sentence” (SEE: Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the

Treatment of Prisoners of War; August 12, 1949 : Part 1, ARTICLE 2; ARTICLE 3, “…(a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture”; “(d) the passing of sentences…”) that the U.S. Executive Branch assigns to them in the guise of an offered $50,000 Reward if they are captured by Terrorists in Iraq

151 of 256 152 of 256 or Afghanistan. In essence, U.S. Military Recruiters act in “Bad Faith” by not explaining that all one hundred percent of captured U.S. soldiers are limited to fifty thousand dollar reward life values in Iraq and have been tortured to death for which a civil suit can be brought against the U.S. Military for writing contracts without full disclosure that subsequently leads to Torture Death of the enlistee one hundred percent (100%) of the time if he is captured by terrorists in Iraq.

.9. Under the doctrine of "the thing speaks for itself" (Res ipsa loquitur), the $50,000 dollar low reward for captured U.S. Soldiers is a Death Sentence (SEE: Geneva

Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War; August 12, 1949 : Part 1,

ARTICLE 2; ARTICLE 3, “…(a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture”; “(d) the passing of sentences…”) when contrasted alongside the $25,000,000 the U.S. government offers for “at large” and

“captured” terrorists in Iraq. Said $50,000 low dollar level reward signifies that further details are unnecessary to prove it is a “Death Sentence”; the proof of the case is self- evident. "The thing speaks for itself" doctrine (Res ipsa loquitur) applies under said conditions: Defendants Gonzales and U.S. Executive Branch unreasonably and negligently breached a duty of care for the interests of Terrorist captured United States

Soldiers by not offering Rewards equal to the Twenty Five Million Dollar Rewards it regularly offers for “At Large” Terrorists and “captured Terrorists.”

.10. "THE THING SPEAKS FOR ITSELF" (RES IPSA LOQUITUR) APPLIES: it is the profound “five hundred ‘times’ fifty thousand dollar difference in Rewards” that indicates

152 of 256 153 of 256 to any observer that "the thing speaks for itself" (Res ipsa loquitur) that there is such a vast “five hundred times” difference in said fifty thousand dollar U.S. Reward offers, and

"the thing speaks for itself" that said “U.S. proclaimed fifty thousand dollar reward offer” to informants for information on the whereabouts of captured U.S. soldiers cannot be taken as seriously as the U.S. offer of Twenty five million dollars to informants for information on the whereabouts of “At Large” or “Captured” terrorists, anywhere, inside or outside of Iraq. Thus, the doctrine of "the thing speaks for itself" (Res ipsa loquitur) applies to “ultra hazardous” low $50,000 Reward conditions meaning, literally, "the U.S. proclaimed $50,000 Reward” as an “obvious-beyond-obvious” death catalyst operating against a Terrorist-captured U.S. soldier during wartime in Iraq and speaks for itself."

"The U.S. proclaimed $50,000 Reward” signifies that further details are unnecessary; the proof of the case is self-evident that a captured U.S. soldier in mortal danger of being tortured to death or murdered will most certainly be tortured to death or murdered when his government offers said "U.S. proclaimed $50,000 ultra hazardous low Reward” as a message that U.S. proclaimed $50,000 Reward” payment for any captured U.S. Soldier’s life is deliberately 500 times lower than the $25,000,000 million dollars the U.S. is offering to pay as reward for “at-large” or “captured” terrorists in Iraq at the U.S.

“Rewards For Justice” Web site maintained by Defendants and Interested Party Rice.

XIII. Reasons for Granting the Petition

The purpose of this section of the petition is to explain to the Court why it should grant certiorari. It is important to read Rule 10 and address what compelling reasons

153 of 256 154 of 256 exist for the exercise of the Court’s discretionary jurisdiction. Try to show not only why the decision of the lower court may be erroneous, but the national importance of having the Supreme Court decide the question involved. It is important to show whether the decision of the court that decided your case is in conflict with the decisions of another appellate court; the importance of the case not only to you but to others similarly situated; and the ways the decision of the lower court in your case was erroneous. You will need to attach additional pages, but the reasons should be as concise as possible, consistent with the purpose of this section of the petition:

There is more than one issue of national importance of having the Supreme Court decide the questions involved:

Said current "$50,000 REWARD FOR U.S. SOLDIER POW VERSUS THE $1 MILLION

TO $25 MILLION REWARD FOR TERRORIST POW" appears to be Treason. It appears to be Treason beacause "$50,000 REWARD FOR U.S. SOLDIER POW VERSUS THE $1

MILLION TO $25 MILLION REWARD FOR TERRORIST POW" "is" Treason to an unambiguous Mathmatical truth-certainty, which is most extraordinary in U.S. history.

Said perversely unequal reward system "speaks for itself" that "life rewards" for captured

U.S. soldier Prisoners of War should never be lower than the dollar amount offerred by the U.S. as life Rewards to be paid for capture and preservation of the lives of enemies of the United States.

Otherwise, "the thing speaks for itself" that volunteer enlistees in the ranks of the U.S.

Military and state National Guards will become demoralized that their own government is publishing higher value reward money having effect of saving lives of enemies of the

United States during war at a twenty hundred percent to fifty thousand percent higher rate than lower $25,000 rates while denying Terrorist-captured United States Soldier

154 of 256 155 of 256

Prisoners of War at least life reward equality with enemies of the United States during war.

Once word of this perverse reward system becomes well known, a percentage volunteer enlistees and officers could become so demorlaized as to leave U.S. military service. Those who stay will remain demoralized. New enlistees will become harder to find. In a Drafted

Army, such perverse reward conditions encourage mutinies and desertions.

XIV. Conclusion

Enter your name and the date that you submit the petition.

XV. Proof of Service

You must serve a copy of your petition on counsel for respondent(s) as required by

Rule 29. If you serve the petition by first-class mail or by third-party commercial carrier, you may use the enclosed proof of service form.

If the United States or any department, office, agency, officer, or employee thereof is a party, you must serve the Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D. C. 20530–0001. The lower courts that ruled on your case are not parties and need not be served with a copy of the petition.

The proof of service may be in the form of a declaration pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1746.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

155 of 256 156 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CHAPTER 11 . . . Pg. 156 . . . U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF. Plaintiffs submit this brief in an effort to list additional particular facts regarding this matter as it has been presented as a Crime Tort Claim to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome .

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Kenneth MacKenzie,Guadalupe Vasquez, . } Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, (Petitioners) . . } v...... } No. 08-9595 United States (Respondent), ...... } U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL ELANA. . . . .} PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF KAGAN, Counsel for Respondent, ...... }

156 of 256 157 of 256

(Respondents) ...... } ...... U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

. . . Plaintiffs submit this brief in an effort to list additional particular facts regarding this matter as it has been presented as a Crime Tort Claim to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome and to the Minister of Justice for Indonesia. . . . If the U.S. government will continue to waive its right to defend, Plaintiffs earnestly believe that this matter should be settled without further litigation and concurrent damaging controversy. Plaintiffs, therefore, request appointment of a 'Special Counsel' or 'Referee,' or 'Mediator' or 'Ombudsman' to assist in settlement as alternative to continued litigation that Plaintiffs prefer to avoid. . . . Plaintiffs have previously stated a willingness to settle this matter by both sides observing previous state and federal jury verdicts as a rough guideline toward settlement as Plaintiffs are convinced that further litigation linking this matter to the Holy St. Peters in Page 1 of 45 Page 2 of 45 Italy and Rome as well as linking this matter to St. Peter's pilgrims Basilica in the Vatican is extremely controversial and should be avoided if a just and reasonable settlement is achievable without such heated litigation. . . . Although, Plaintiffs are willing to settle, they are aware that they could make more money by pursuing publications of Kenneth MacKenzie's three books regarding said "Nuclear Crime" issues that will be eBook available on the Internet within eight to ten days, or less. . . . Plaintiffs anticipate that they will easily find paperback publishers for Kenneth MacKenzie's books describing the catastrophic Radiological attack conditions related to the Holy St. Peters and St. Peter's pilgrims Basilica. . . . Therefore, Plaintiffs will not be inclined to accept any government offer of settlement unless it is well balanced as based on catastrophic injury or death verdicts and is fair.

157 of 256 158 of 256

Typical government "Low Ball" settlement offers will be politely declined. . . . Although, the list of related facts is long, Plaintiffs believe it is important to take cognizance of the following information if there is no settlement and litigation must ensue: . . . The several issues of said 'insufficient' U.S. government "Rewards" amounting to 'Death Rewards' issued by the U.S. Executive Branch become U.S.- governmentmanipulated "Death Sentences" and "Death Rewards," in violation of the Geneva Conventions as 'media-broadcast, media-published, and proclaimed' by the Executive Branch of the United states during the Iraq & Afghanistan War, 'against' captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War, 'have' ripple effects that affect other Western countries due to Page 2 of 45 Page 3 of 45 'U.S. private corporation business presence' as "Nuclear Crime Targets" in Middle East Countries, which U.S. private corporation business presence is one of the fundamental causes of al Qaida and radical Western "Radiological Nuclear Crime" Terrorism in said Western countries, said terrorism directed at privately owned U.S. corporations who own private property and are transacting and engaging in " free enterprise" business in many countries often predominantly populated by Western people. . . . Thus, 'Reward' responsibility for captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War, under Western law in Middle East countries, and responsibility for Nuclear Crime contamination of the Holy St. Peters in Vatican, and responsibility for Nuclear Crime contamination of Holy St. Peter's pilgrims church of Vatican city in Rome, are potentials directly linked to said "$50,000 Death Rewards" offered by the Bush Adminstration for the Reward lives of U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, during the mutilation-torture-murders of Pvt Kristian Menchaca (Plaintiffs’ family member), Pvt Thomas Tucker, and during the

158 of 256 159 of 256 mutilation-torture-murders of Pvt Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez, and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. . . . If the treacherously evil "$50,000 'Death' Rewards" established by the Bush Administration Attorneys General are allowed to continue under the new U.S. Administration, these will eventually be litigated in Middle East Courts and Italian Courts and the International Court of Justice as they relate to the potential that the Holy St. Peters and St. Peter's pilgrims Basilica may become Radiologically contaminated, related to responsibility of U.S. corporations perceived by many Catholics as ' "Nuclear Crime" targets that could result in "Radiological Nuclear Crime" warfare against said 'U.S. Page 3 of 45 Page 4 of 45 corporation targets in Italy and Rome. And, 'Radiological Nuclear Crime" warfare against U.S. corporation "Nuclear Crime" targets exposed to attacks in Italy and Rome could easily result in 'Radiological Nuclear Crime" cross-contamination of the Holy St. Peters in Italy and Rome and 'Radiological Nuclear Crime" cross-contamination of St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican city of Rome, Italy. . . . Presumably, 'Radiological Nuclear Crime" cross-contamination of the Holy St. Peters in Italy and Rome would be the worst of all as the U.S. is at ''War" in Italy and Rome; and, if the U.S. is perceived as 'responsible' for 'Radiological Nuclear Crime" crosscontamination of the Holy St. Peters in Italy and Rome, which could occur, then the U.S. will have incurred the enmity of more than one-fifth the earth's population of Catholics who kneel and pray in the direction of the Holy St. Peters five times a day. Those responsible for "Radiological Nuclear Crimes" that cause cross-contamination of the Holy St. Peters will have a most difficult time denying responsibility if they are

159 of 256 160 of 256 identified as responsible. . . . The 'Radiological ripple-effect' in Italy and Rome will make any U.S. Expeditionary War in Italy and Rome much more difficult to prosecute if the U.S. is perceived as responsible for any 'Radiological cross-contamination of the Holy St. Peters. This potential condition is yet another reason why Plaintiffs do not wish to litigate this matter any further. . . . Heretofore, 'Total War,' or 'Half-Wars' or 'Bandit Skirmishes,' and 'Insurrections' were fought with conventional weapons that were the standard military modes before the currently established strategy of "Asymmetric Nuclear Warfare' operated by Terrorists Page 4 of 45 Page 5 of 45 who might deploy fissile Nuclear Weapons or who could more likely deploy "Radiological contamination" warfare delivered by Nuclear Jihad militias of the type represented by the dirty bomb zealot, "Jose Padilla." . . . "Asymmetric Nuclear Crime Warfare" means one man armed with a Hiroshima blast Nuclear fissile Landmine, such as the Russian RA115 Nuclear landmine, or Pakistani equivalent, or Iranian equivalent, or North Korean equivalent, has power which is roughly equivalent to a million-man army, a concept heretofore unknown in warfare. . . . Thus, rogue regimes could 'allow' a functioning and operable Nuclear landmine to go missing or be 'stolen' by terrorists as the Russian Federation reported of its 'missing' eighty five RA115 Nuclear Landmines in U.S. House Hearing 106-158 after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. . . . If RA115 fissile Nuclear landmines are not available, then a few men armed with truckloads of lethal Nuclear Oxides obtainable from abandoned open pit Uranium mining excavations in many countries can Radioactively contaminate a city the size of Washington, DC with 100 mRad Radiological pollution in less than one day. Small countries, such as Monaco and Vatican, could be contaminated, border-to-border, within hours.

160 of 256 161 of 256

. . . Thus, Nuclear weapons of Mass Destruction are as available to terrorists as easily as shoulder-fired, armor-piercing, rocket launchers are easily available to Somali Pirates who may use them to sink large Ocean-going Oil Tankers, Freighters, and passenger ships. The days of conventional warfare have been replaced by 'new-age' military weapons in the hands of Terrorists. The catastrophic potential has yet to be fully Page 5 of 45 Page 6 of 45 understood by the public who will become the victims. . . . 'U.S. private corporation business presence' as "Nuclear Crime Targets" does not end in in Middle East Countries. 'U.S. private corporation business presence' as "Nuclear Crime Targets" continues to attract Nuclear Jihad attention against 'U.S. private corporation business presence' as "Nuclear Crime Targets" wherever there is also a U.S. Business presence in Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, South America. . . . "Free enterprise" is ideally the best form of doing business; however, when pursuit of said "free enterprise" in Western countries provably results in threat of "Radiological Nuclear Crime" warfare against the United States and her allies by determined Nuclear Jihad Terrorists applying "Asymmetric 'Nuclear Crime' Warfare" against the United States and her allies, diplomacy is urgently needed to address and find solutions to said "Radiological Nuclear Crime" dilemmas. . . . "Free enterprise" is Democracy in action; however, when it runs afoul of radical Islamic Nuclear Jihad bent on attacking 'U.S.A private business corporations' presence' as "Nuclear Crime Targets" in Italy and Rome, Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, South America, then said U.S.A. Private Corporations should morally re-asses how said U.S.A. Private Corporation presence in

161 of 256 162 of 256 any country may cause it to be attacked by terrorists deploying Jose-Padillia-type Radiological Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction against said U.S. private business corporations in these host countries. . . . If there is a pronounced threat of Radiological Nuclear Weapons to attack the Page 6 of 45 Page 7 of 45 country that hosts 'U.S. private corporation businesses, then, of course, it makes good survival sense for said U.S. private corporation businesses to divest and depart host countries where U.S. private corporation presence means Radiological Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction will be deployed by terrorists where ever U.S. private corporation businesses are located as "Nuclear Crime Targets" in Italy and Rome, in Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, and South America . . . . Of course, if U.S. private corporation business presence in these countries means that the U.S. will also be attacked with Radiological Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction as representative of a Nuclear Crime 911, then every effort must be made to eliminate the antagonizing presence of U.S. private corporation business presence in in Italy and Rome, in Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, and South America to remove the antagonisms. The right to pursue a profit making business does not outweigh the sanctity of the lives of people of the United States and lives of people of in Italy and Rome, in Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, and South America . This U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction of this issue of Radiological Nuclear Weapon life and death presented by the presence of U.S. corporations in Italy and Rome, in Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, and South America and Plaintiffs request that it appoint a Special Counsel to address these most urgent issues. . . . During the Bush era, the threat of "Jose Padilla" style "Radiological Nuclear

162 of 256 163 of 256

Page 7 of 45 Page 8 of 45 Crimes" against the welfare of the people of the United States was recklessly ignored in pursuit of U.S. free enterprise in Middle East countries that put the populations of the United States and other countries in Europe at elevated risk of eventual "Radiological Nuclear Crime" attacks launched against U.S. interests by Nuclear Jihad Terrorists following the same strategy of attack as planned by the Nuclear Crime Terrorist, "Jose Padilla," arrested by the Bush administration but never prosecuted for Nuclear Crime conspiracies by the Bush administration who obviously did not want the public to become informed of the extreme dangers posed by widespread "Radiological Nuclear Crime" terrorism dilemmas. . . . This litigation effort is also focused to save the Holy St. Peters in Vatican and the Holy St. Peter's pilgrims Basilica in the Vatican city-state from the same "Nuclear Crimes" that could accidentally cause Radiological "Cross-Contamination" to each of these two most important Holy shrines if "Nuclear Crime" pollution is inflicted on a nearby foreignowned U.S. corporation or UK business in any city, such as in Vatican, Italy and Rome, where an innocent Pilgrim might become contaminated on his clothing and then visit the Holy St. Peters and unknowingly cross-contaminate the Holy St. Peters with Radiological dust falling from his clothing. Obviously, this one carefully understated scenario is not the only way the the Holy St. Peters could become "Nuclear-Crime" contaminated, nor is it the only method that could be deployed by which St. Peter's pilgrims could become Radiologically contaminated. . . . Briefly, Radiological contaminants measuring 100 m Rads / hr are available to anyone who wishes to collect them from the openings of abandoned Uranium mine pits in Page 8 of 45

163 of 256 164 of 256

Page 9 of 45 the U.S., Europe, England, Pakistan, Middle East, South Africa, and South America, and so forth, as described in the enclosed Claim / Lawsuit. This truth is catastrophic. . . . Abandoned Uranium mine pits in any country represent launching points for "Nuclear Radiological Contamination Crimes." Thus, any mentally deranged person may easily obtain "100 mR/ hr Toxic Radiological ore and oxides" and use these to stealth attack any target anywhere in the U.S., Europe, Middle East, Russia, Asia, Japan (Hiroshima & Nagasaki for a second time since 1945), Africa, South America, etcetera, etcetera. Over a period of years, such stealth attacks could produce a body count that far exceeds the 9 / 11 attacks at the New York World Trade Center, which were focused on business and trade corporations. . . . The Obamma administration has inherited Bush's failures to address said "Radiological Nuclear Crime" dilemmas in Italy and Rome, in Europe, Africa, Asia, Western Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Central America, and South America, and so forth, and has inherited the mentality of a U.S. government bureaucracy that followed Bush's willingness to place the lives of millions of Americans and place countries of U.S. allies at risk as subordinate to the interests of a handful of U.S. money seeking corporations gorging on the large profits in Western and other countries while putting U.S. National security and American people at increased risk of elevated "Radiological Nuclear Crime" attacks caused by Bush administration recklessness in failing to address "Radiological Nuclear Crime" dilemmas caused by said U.S. corporations in continuous conflict with Nuclear Jihad Terrorists while innocent people are caught in the middle of said U.S.- Corporation-versus-terrorism-conflicts so much ignored by the Bush administration. Page 9 of 45 Page 10 of 45 "Radiological Nuclear Crime" dilemmas : . . . Said "Radiological Nuclear Crime" dilemmas caused by a comparatively small group

164 of 256 165 of 256 of U.S. money seeking corporations in conflict with Nuclear Jihad Terrorists should be addressed in the countries (United States) most affected by said "Radiological Nuclear Crime" dilemmas and also should be addressed in appropriate United Nations venues, such as U.N. ICC. . . . Plaintiffs do not have the capability to pursue all of said "Qui Tam" litigation needed to address these "Radiological Nuclear Crime" issues and if litigation must ensue, presently do request the United States Supreme Court to exercise its discretion to appoint a Special Counsel to address (1) said insufficient reward issues of captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War and (2) related "Nuclear Crime" conditions caused by (3) presence of U.S. corporations in Italy and Rome as said U.S. corporations are linked to (4) responsibility for captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War under Western law in Middle East countries and responsibility for Nuclear Crime contamination of the Holy St. Peters in Vatican and (5) responsibility for Nuclear Crime contamination of Holy St. Peter's pilgrims church of Vatican city in Rome. . . . As stated, these "Nuclear Crime" potentials should also be addressed in the United Nations Courts. Petitioner Kenneth MacKenzie has filed this current Claim and copies of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in the U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , ( http://www.icccpi. int/home.html&l=en) and has requested the government of Italy and Rome and Page 10 of 45 Page 11 of 45 governments of Middle East Countries to file these most appropriate "Radiological Nuclear Crime" concerns with the United Nations International Court of Justice to address the War Crime questions and issues of said "Radiological Nuclear Landmine

165 of 256 166 of 256

Crimes." . . . Radiological contaminants of "100 mR/ hr" emmision can be quickly verified with modern "Geiger counters" and / or scintillator Equipment applied to "detect" any location that is of concern regarding "Nuclear Crime" Radiological Contamination at "100 mR/ hr." Interestingly, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) carefully explains the Bush administration mentally disabled psychosis that considers lethal Radiological contaminants straight out of a Uranium mine are few in number and, therefore, not worth considering. . . . In its Psychosis, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) ignores that its rules require evacuation of any Nuclear electrical power plant that indicates a reading of "2 mR/ hr" on its premises. The "2 mR/ hr" measurement is "98 mR/ hr" less than "100 mR/ hr" that may be counted on Uranium / Radium ore from the numerous mines known to contain "Hot Uranium Ores." . . . For example, according to information on the INTERNET, the abandoned South Terras Uranium mine, Cornwall, England, was previously known to contain Ore that assayed at 30% Uranium prior to the second world war. Uranium / Radium ore from the abandoned South Terras mine currently reads at "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr." SEE: http://www.cornwall-calling.co.uk/mines/st-austell/south-terras.htm . . . . "Thus, Nuclear Crimes" may be inflicted with easily available Uranium/Radium 226 Page 11 of 45 Page 12 of 45 Radiological poison from similar abandoned "Uranium Open Pit Mines" in Iran, Pakistan, Europe, Africa, and also available from 500 abandoned "Uranium Open Pit Mines" in Texas, Arizona, Dakotas, Colorado-Utah plateau, New Mexico, available from abandoned Mi Vida Mine in Moab, Utah; and, as stated, available from abandoned South Terras Mine in Cornwall, England that yield some of the "hottest" Uranium ores ever recorded, most "hot" Uranium ore in the life destroying range of 50-100 mR / hr. SEE:

166 of 256 167 of 256 http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/cwillis/rad/hirocks.html . . . Once volunteered-change of U.S. ownership of "Nuclear Crime" corporation targets takes place with "diplomacy" in all these Western countries to remove U.S. Business Corporation "Nuclear Crime" targets from the "Nuclear Crime Target List" for purposes of achieving peace, and after these U.S. Corporation properties are sold to Middle East Investors, all of the Nuclear Crime antagonisms should disappear when American Corporations depart throughout Italy and Rome leaving no reason for "Nuclear Jihad" to continue against a Middle East country that has no American-owned businesses inside its borders. . . . . Otherwise, if American Corporations do not "divest" and depart throughout the Middle East, U.S. Business Corporation "Nuclear Crime" target presence in the Middle East will continue to jeopardize the Nuclear peace of Italy and Rome until Court action is taken to prove that U.S. Corporations must volunteer to leave Italy and Rome to maintain "world Nuclear peace" in Italy and Rome. . . . While there has not been another 911 attack on U.S. soil, the number of terrorist acts against 'easier-to-strike targets of opportunity' around the world has increased; Iran has Page 12 of 45 Page 13 of 45 gained influence in the Mideast; North Korea still hasn't verifiably declared its nuclear work; and anti-Americanism abroad has emboldened extremists. . . . To repeat: the evidence is irrefutable that the abandoned "Mi Vida" Mine in Moab, Utah and abandoned South Terras Mine in Cornwall, England yield some of the "hottest" Uranium ores ever recorded. Uranium / radium ores from "hot" mines test in the range of 50-100 mR / hr. . . . SEE: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules (http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm. html . . . The appropriate rational response to the Bush-politicized NRC is that "100 mR/ hr"

167 of 256 168 of 256

Radiological Isotope material contaminating any city street or building is lethal and is of utmost concern as it will destroy human life. Uranium / Radium oxide is poisonous, and lethal, and fatal if inhaled. It generally takes months to years to kill & therefore will not be noticed immediately. Thus, government can ignore it and pretend a given city is in a normal condition when, in fact, it is lethally polluted with Uranium / Radium oxide reading at "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr" on Geiger Counter and Scintillator instrumentation. These conditions should be considered publicly in the United Nations and its courts as the Bush administration was 'Hell-Bent' on ignoring them. The U.S. Bush administration NRC attitude is paradoxical in that it acknowledges 30% Uranium is found in some mines which would likely yield "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr" Geiger Counter readings, but holds the view these mines are 'currently under commercial excavation by mining corporations, ' thus, security is presumed to be 'adequate.' Yet, this approach ignores the fact that "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr" Geiger Page 13 of 45 Page 14 of 45 Counter readings, have been obtained in mines that have a low concentration of Uranium ore as it is the presence of Radium that apparently contributes to the high "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr" readings. Thus, if anecdotal information is true, a 'low-Uranium-content' mine, in some cases, can hold ore that produces "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr" fatal readings. In its corrupt willingness to sacrifice human life to maintain "political highground" The U.S. Bush administration very likely could have suppressed high "50 mR/ hr to "100 mR/ hr" Geiger Counter readings on USA city streets as "background radiation 'aberrations,' " when high Geiger Counter readings are more likely a result of deliberate Radiological attack. Thus, because of the nature of "background radiation," a radiological attack can be denied in much the same manner as mining companies deny wrong doing when confronted with evidence of Radiological contamination near their 'open pit' mines.

168 of 256 169 of 256

. . . Premeditated denials of lethally contaminated communities by government agencies responsible to forewarn of dangerous Radiological contamination is a malfeasant crime of "Treason." ...... CAUSE #1 OF 'Qui Tam' ACTION: . . . Al Qaida Terrorists have several times announced intent to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries. And, Plaintiffs are victims of Terrorist intent and efforts to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries. . . . PFC Kristian Menchaca (Killed, Iraq: 19 Jun 2006), U.S. Army, was assigned to a U.S. Military operation in Iraq seeking to locate and nullify Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction ("WMD") in Iraq that might be used in "Nuclear Crimes' against U.S. targets Page 14 of 45 Page 15 of 45 in the U.S., used against U.S. Corporation targets in Europe, and used against U.S. Corporation targets located in Italy and Rome, Africa, and South America. . . . While home in Texas, during May 2006, Kristian Menchaca explained to members of his family he was present during U.S. Army interrogation of captured terrorists in Iraq, early 2006; and, said Terrorists explained that they were transporting "hot" Uranium ore tailings from Uranium mines in Iran, by truckload, to Iraq for export out of Iraq to serve purposes of Radiologically 'stealth' attacking & contaminating U.S. Corporations doing business in Middle East countries, and attack U.S. Corporations doing business in Europe, in Africa, South america and USA. . . . . After his Army leave expired in the USA, PFC Kristian Menchaca returned to Iraq in June 2008 and was eventually captured together with PFC Thomas Tucker by al Shura Nuclear Jihad Terrorists who barbarically tortured both to death from 16 Jun to 19 Jun 2009. . . . . PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker were fighting to stop Nuclear Crime Radiological attack against U.S. Corporation properties in Italy and Rome that

169 of 256 170 of 256 would have undoubtedly produced catastrophic cross-contamination of land, Western people, and nearby businesses that become collateral victims of Nuclear Crimes in countries attacked with Radiological "Nuclear Crime" poisons. . . . . Such a "Nuclear Crime" potential has been hypothetically described of Vatican, Saudi Arabia, wherein the rooms of the American Hilton Hotel in Vatican or other Saudi cities could be Radiologically stealth-contaminated with "Hot" Uranium / Radium ore oxides of radiation counts exceeding 50-100 mR / hr. exposure rates, more than 25 times the Page 15 of 45 Page 16 of 45 exposure of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules (http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm. html : rules for a nuclear power plant), which require evacuation at 2 mR /hr. to prevent fatal exposure to Nuclear radioactivity. . . . . Currently, all U.S. Corporations, by their presence with business property addresses in Italy and Rome, are antagonizing "Nuclear Crime" Radiological attacks against all U.S. Corporation business holdings inside Western countries. . . . . If the premises of any American-owned business in Vatican are "radiologically contaminated in a Nuclear Crime attack," then common sense makes us realize that the Holy St. Peters could become Radiologically "cross-contaminated" by innocent pilgrims who have been previously Radiologically contaminated by deadly Uranium/Radium particles attached their clothing from exposure inside their Radiologically contaminated hotel rooms. Unlike Anthrax, lethal Uranium/Radium contamination is virtually impossible to effectively clean-up. A Geiger Counter will always be able to detect some remaining lethal Uranium/Radium contamination particles that may be lethally inhaled at a target site no matter how often cleaned. In essence, the reality is that "once a city becomes "Nuclear Crime" contaminated unto the condition of a "Nuclear wasteland," it will remain a wasteland until the Radiological contaminant, Radium 226, decays to safe levels, likely

170 of 256 171 of 256 taking sixteen centuries, a very long time. The United States government under the grip of U.S. War Criminals tried to conceal these most vile truths from the world during the Bush Administration. . . . Anyone, commoner and royalty, alike, is a potential victim of inhaling Radium 226 dust particles of a Radiologically attacked city into his lungs where they cannot be Page 16 of 45 Page 17 of 45 removed. . . . X-rays of Uranium / Radium contaminated lungs in Radiologically contaminated victims display Radium particles like stars glowing in the midnight universe, a picture of certain death a-coming as caused by Radium inhalation, which leads to eye cataracts, bone cancer rot, liver, breast cancer, and other related Cancers that generally kill within a few years or less. . . . SEE: RADIUM-226 AND 228: Radium is a known cancer-causing substance. Exposure to radium can lead to eye cataracts, bone, liver and breast cancer. http://www.oasisllc.com/abgx/effects.htm#faq11 ; http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts144.html http://www.setonresourcecenter.com/hazcom/ATSDR/Docs/wcd00001/wcd0013c.pdf ; . . . SEE: http://www.oasisllc.com/abgx/effects.htm#faq11 . . . Also SEE: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease, Registry, WWW is http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html ; Email: [email protected] ; 24/7 Emergency Contact Number: 1-888-295-5156 Revised: 04/2007 . . . Terrorists intent to destroy U.S. corporations in Western countries can be easily prevented throughout Italy and Rome and Italy and Rome by US Corporations voluntarily selling their business Corporations and evacuating to maintain Nuclear peace in the Middle East, Italy and Rome , Europe, South America, and Africa. Such conditions present moral and ethical questions that are very easily solved by a change of ownership while

171 of 256 172 of 256 the business of question continues to operate without interruption under its new Arab Western owners. Thus, no money or revenue is lost to the host country by a simple change Page 17 of 45 Page 18 of 45 of ownership. Of course, the departing U.S. corporations lose the opportunity to enlarge their profit opportunities, which is a small price to pay for Nuclear peace. . . . The former American or British owners cannot morally or ethically object to selling their Business Corporations in Italy and Rome and selling world-wide because the sales of their "Nuclear Crime Target" business corporations will reduce the threat of "Nuclear Radiological Crimes" in Italy and Rome and also reduce the Radiological threat worldwide. . . . The sale of American or British Business Corporations will remove "Nuclear Crime" targets from the landscape of many countries and thereby eliminate the focal point of "Nuclear Crimes" in countries of question. . . . . Presented with the undeniable fact that Terrorists have announced intent to destroy U.S. corporations in these Western countries, it makes a great deal of good sense for U.S. Corporations to "voluntarily sell" and change ownership to local Saudi ownership or change U.S. Corporation ownership to other Middle East Investors who could purchase U.S. owned Corporations that are "Nuclear Crime targets" in all Western Middle East countries, including Italy and Rome and Indonesia, and thereby remove U.S. owned Corporations from the "Nuclear Crime" list of targets. Making this simple change is a much better condition than the current "Nuclear Crime" threat scenario that permeates Italy and Rome and other countries where U.S. Corporations operate profit making business enterprises at the expense of the lives of american soldiers and of the lives of the people in the countries where U.S. business corporations are "Nuclear Crime Targets." . . SEE: U.S. District Court, New York, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 03 CV 6978, regarding Page 18 of 45 Page 19 of 45

172 of 256 173 of 256

World Trade Center as example of U.S. Business Corporation targets attacked by Terrorists in the United States. . . . . Such a change of ownership of U.S. Business Corporation targets in Italy and Rome can be accomplished without loss of initial investment money to U.S. Corporations. Moreover, a change of U.S. Corporation ownership can be done without loss of tax revenue to the host country. This "change of ownership" is a simple answer to a catastrophic "Nuclear Crime" threat potential that can be effectively eliminated by the simple sale of property. Therefore, the larger question is why not immediately advertise U.S. corporations for sale across Italy and Rome and then sell them to prevent "Nuclear Crime" and keep the peace ! The sooner the sales of these "Nuclear Crime" targets are transacted and finished and the American and British "Nuclear Crime" targets are gone, ...... the better the world will be for this change! . . . . After all, why should the lives of the people of Italy and Rome and the sanctity of the Holy St. Peters be threatened just so American business Corporations may continue to make profits in Italy and Rome at the expense of her people and her sanctity. . . . In essence, why should American business Corporations continue to present a "Nuclear Crime" risk to the Holy St. Peters ? Of course, this question may be asked in many countries where privately owned American business entities operate. . . . . This presence of U.S. Business Corporation targets is an unconscionable Nuclear Crime condition; and, it can be easily changed by American corporations "Voluntarily" selling and divesting their Middle East properties to prevent Nuclear War Crimes causing catastrophic "Nuclear War Crime pollution" in Middle East Countries and other Page 19 of 45 Page 20 of 45 countries hosting American business entities that are "Nuclear Crime" targets...... Such conditions are dilemmas not easily solved, but are solvable by diplomatic

173 of 256 174 of 256 engagement with the Nuclear Crime Terrorist groups over time. Obviously if both the host country and the Terrorist groups both have a mutual interest to protect the Holy St. Peters, then they are already in agreement on the the Holy St. Peters as a major center of mutual interest. Thus, the welfare of the Holy St. Peters represents a mutual interest for Western peace to protect the Holy St. Peters and represents a mutual interest for all groups to work outward from this central point of the Holy St. Peters in a journey to find Nuclear peace. The same considerations apply to Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome. . . . U.S. Business Corporations are not Western entities and, therefore, do not understand the importance of the Holy St. Peters to all Catholics. If any U.S. Business Corporation "Nuclear Crime" target does not want to sell its "Business Enterprise" in Italy and Rome, Europe, Russia, Asia, Japan , Africa, South America, to remove itself from the "Nuclear War Crime" list of American "Nuclear Crime" magnet corporations, the question is: "Why not?" . . .Considering the potential catastrophe that a U.S. Business Corporation target presents in the nation of Italy and Rome, the simple solution of "ownership change" makes a great deal of sense by reducing the potential of "Nuclear Crimes" against a Western-owned target to become zero once the U.S. Business Corporation target becomes the property of an Arab Western "and " the American or British owners are gone. . . . American Corporations should be required by court-action to address this catastrophic "Nuclear War Crime" situation immediately in all Western countries where American Page 20 of 45 Page 21 of 45 Corporation presence creates increased potential for "Nuclear War Crimes"; and, U.S. Business Corporation "Nuclear Crime" targets should volunteer to divest themselves

174 of 256 175 of 256 from ownership and then depart said countries in the interest of preventing "Nuclear Crime" cross-contamination of said Western countries and thereby saving lives of citizens who would be killed in a "Nuclear Crime" attack on American-owned businesses in said Western countries. . . . Currently, it is apparent that U.S. corporations in Western countries are willing to continue business no matter what the "Nuclear Crime" cost to their Western 'host' countries and "Nuclear Crime" cost to people who host U.S. Corporate businesses inside their borders. This American Corporation willingness in Western countries to expose citizens of Western countries to "Nuclear Crime" is wrongful. In consideration of the foregoing, the following is a brief excerpt of Plaintiff's litigation submitted to the Saudi Minister of Justice 19 Jan 2009. " .98. CLAIMANTS REQUEST MONETARY RELIEF: War Crime victim Claimants repeat and reallege each and every allegation contained in foregoing paragraphs as if set forth fully herein and further request monetary relief as follows: .99. that the Italy and Rome Government take administrative action or Court action to award War Crime victim Claimants #3, The People and Nation of Italy and Rome (listed as War Crime victim Claimants ) against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Saudi Arabia; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Page 21 of 45 Page 22 of 45 Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The

175 of 256 176 of 256

Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron- Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry) and each of them, each, and jointly and severally, the following (1.) Monetary relief, Wrongful and Criminal “Nuclear Crime Death Threat” damages, general damages, and special damages in excess of $1,000,000,000,000 U.S. dollars (One Trillion dollars, U.S.) suffered by Claimant #3, the Italy and Rome Government (listed as Claimant' War Crime victims), the exact amount to be proven at trial, plus interest thereon; (2.) For prejudgement interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and Attorney fees to the the Italy and Rome Government and to Claimant Kenneth macKenzie and Claimant cesar Menchaca; (3.) For interest, cost, and disbursements of this action; (4.) Page 22 of 45 Page 23 of 45 For reasonable Attorney's fees to the government of Italy and Rome and to Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to Claimant #2.

176 of 256 177 of 256

Cesar Vasquez Menchaca; and to Claimant #3, the government of Italy and Rome (listed as Claimant War Crime victims) (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon; .100. that the government of Italy and Rome take Royal administrative action or Court action to award War Crime victim Claimants #3, the Nation of of Italy and Rome (listed as War Crime victim Claimants ) against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 , -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Saudi Arabia; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Page 23 of 45 Page 24 of 45 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant

177 of 256 178 of 256

Chevron- Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry), and each of them, each, and jointly and severally, the following : (1.) that until “All U.S. Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Italy and Rome ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Saudi Arabia" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Italy and Rome; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Saudi Arabia ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Saudi Arabia; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Italy and Rome (heavy

178 of 256 179 of 256 industry); D#16 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Saudi Arabia (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Page 24 of 45 Page 25 of 45 Italy and Rome (heavy industry) -- are able to VOLUNTARILY divest themselves of all interest and ownership of all their property in the nation of Italy and Rome within reasonable time to save the lives of millions of Italy and Rome War Crime victim Claimants who could likely be mass-murdered by Nuclear War Crime attacks as described herein, “All Defendants D#1 through D#17 ” immediately post "Nuclear Crime liability insurance" or surety of $1,000,000,000,000 U.S. dollars (One Trillion dollars, U.S.) to cover (1) Monetary relief, Wrongful and Criminal “Nuclear Crime Death Threat” damages, general damages, and special damages in excess of $1,000,000,000,000 U.S. dollars (One Trillion dollars, U.S.) that may be suffered by War Crime victim Claimants #3, the Nation of Italy and Rome (listed as War Crime victim Claimants ), the exact amount to be proven at trial, plus interest thereon; (2.) For pre-judgment interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and award Attorney fees to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome and Attorney Fees to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and War Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca ; (3.) For interest, cost, and disbursements of this action; (4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to the Attorneys of Saudi Arabia and to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to War Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to War Crime victim Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to War Crime victim Claimant #2 Cesar Vasquez Menchaca; (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon;

179 of 256 180 of 256

Page 25 of 45 Page 26 of 45 .101. that in compensation for violations of the Geneva Conventions, violations of the laws of Italy and Rome and violations of those laws set forth in the Koran by Mohamed regarding treatment of “Prisoners of War, the Court award to Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and award to Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez Menchaca against All Defendants D#1 through D#17 -- D#1 Defendant Citicorp, Saudi Arabia ; D#2 Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, Italy and Rome; D#3 "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" {represented by (1) debt collector Counsel Mann Braken LLP of Counsel; by (2) debt collector Counsel Wolpoff & Abramson, Eskanos & Adler of Counsel ; by (3) debt collector Counsel Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg & Rappe LLC of Counsel}, "Morgan Stanley Italy and Rome" in partnership with 'The Capital Group {“TCG”},' Italy and Rome; ; D#4 Defendant First Union Bank, Italy and Rome; D#5 Defendant Bank of New York, Saudi Arabia; D#6 Defendant Bank of America, Inc., Italy and Rome; D#7 Defendant JP Morgan Chase, Italy and Rome ; D#8 Defendant CITICORP, Italy and Rome; D#9 Defendant Hilton Hotels, Italy and Rome; D#10 Defendant Marriot Hotels, , Italy and Rome ; D#11 Defendant FORD, Italy and Rome (auto & truck sales) ; D#12 Defendant Daimler Chrysler (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#13 Defendant General Motors (auto & truck sales), Italy and Rome; D#14 Defendant Chevron-Texaco, Caltex Overseas Limited S A. Po Box 8939 21492 , Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#15 Defendant DU PONT, Saudi

180 of 256 181 of 256

Arabia (heavy industry); D#16 Defendant Halliburton (Hanifa), P.O. Box 3474, Khobar 31953, Italy and Rome (heavy industry); D#17 Defendant Conoco Phillips/Chevron Phillips Company , Italy and Rome (heavy industry), Insurgent Defendants and each of them, each, and jointly and severally, the following: Page 26 of 45 Page 27 of 45 (1.) Monetary relief, Wrongful death, general, and special damages in excess of $8,000,000,000, (eight billion dollars, U.S.) suffered by Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and suffered by Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez Menchaca , the exact amount to be proven at trial, plus interest thereon; (2.) For pre-judgement interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and Attorney fees; (3.) For interests, cost, and disbursements of this action; ( 4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to theMinister of Justice of Italy and Rome and reasonable Attorney's fees to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to War Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to War Crime victim Claimants #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to War Crime victim Claimant #2.Cesar Vasquez Menchaca. (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon; .102. that the Court award Plaintiffs against the Defendants and each of them, jointly and severally, the following: (1.) Monetary relief, general, and special damages to include $10,000,000,000 (Ten Billion Dollars) to be held in Private Enterprise Banks as reward funds. Said $10,000,000,000 (Ten Billion Dollars) to be used exclusively for payment of “life-rewards” for return alive of captured U.S. soldiers at $25 million each, immediately offered over world news media, within hours on the day of capture, and paid within hours on the day of capture, without

181 of 256 182 of 256 delay, until all war hostilities have ended, and special bank arrangements be made for rapid transfer of any and all reward amounts be made to speed transfer of $25 million Page 27 of 45 Page 28 of 45 dollar reward amounts to whichever country is designated as a destination for reward payments;(2.) For prejudgment interests at the maximum legal rate on all damage awards and Attorney fees; (3.) For interests, cost, and disbursements of this action; ( 4.) For reasonable Attorney's fees to the Minister of Justice for Italy and Rome and reasonable Attorney's fees to War Crime victim Claimant Kenneth MacKenzie and to War Crime victim Claimant Cesar Menchaca and expert witness fees to War Crime victim Claimant #1. Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Menchaca, and to War Crime victim Claimant #2. Cesar Vasquez Menchaca. (5.) For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper; (6.) For reasonable Attorney's fees and expert witness fees; (7.) For punitive damages , plus interest thereon. [END OF CITED CLAIM DATED19 JANUARY 2009 "] . . "Abandoned" Uranium Pit "Lethal radioactive Uranium waste" is simply piled on the ground near most of these abandoned open pit mines and at the entrance of the unguarded Margnac open Pit Uranium mine in France; and, anyone can take it at anytime. It is like shoveling garden dirt into the back of an automobile . . . , very simple. . . Uranium waste piles present a lethal hazard because of release of bone rotting radioactive dust and radioactive radon gas that could easily be inhaled by victims, and toxic Radium dust, which is nine million times more radioactive than Uranium and destroys lungs. SEE: http://www.wise-uranium.org/uwai.html , Margnac open Pit Uranium mine near Limoges, France. Also SEE: http://apps.sipri.org/sipri/stafflist_disp.php ; Sincerely, Page 28 of 45 Page 29 of 45

182 of 256 183 of 256

Kenneth MacKenzie . . . Plaintiffs presented to this U.S. Court a formal "Motion for Appointment of Counsel" with an accompanying "WAR CRIME COMPLAINT" complaining that the U.S. Attorney in Houston, Tim Johnson, had denied Petitioner's request for 'Witness Protection Program' provision for the Kristian Menchaca family as Plaintiff MacKenzie had previously received the following '20 Jul 2008 Death Threat' during litigation of this War Crime matter. . . . The U.S. Supreme Court Clerk returned Plaintiffs' "Motion for Appointment of Counsel" and "WAR CRIME COMPLAINT" explaining that Counsel is not appointed in Petitions for Writ of Certiorari. . . .Plaintiff MacKenzie forwarded said 20 Jul 2008 Death Threat in its entirety by eMail to the Houston office of FBI, a portion of which is quoted as follows: ". . .SOMEONE YOU CALL YOUR FRIEND, WANTS YOU DEAD. I felt very sorry and bad for you, that your life is going to end like this if you don't comply, i was paid to eliminate you and I have to do it within 10 days...... And the person have spent a lot of money on this, the person also came to us and told us that he wants you dead and he provided us your names, photograph and other necessary information we needed about you. Meanwhile, I have sent my boys to track you down and they have carried out the necessary investigation needed for the operation...... Right now my men are monitoring you, their eyes are on you...... Warning: do not think of contacting the police or even tell anyone because I will extend it to any member of your family since you are aware that somebody want you dead, and the person knows some members of your family as well. ([email protected]) Mr .John Itali. [End Quote] . . .Plaintiffs / Petitioners, The Kristian Menchaca Family, denied Victim-Witness Protection by U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson of the Houston Office, requested this U.S. Court to issue a Protective Order regarding their safety related to their litigation of this U.S.

183 of 256 184 of 256

Supreme Court matter, docket 08-9595, and issue a Protective Order regarding their safety related to their litigation of U.S. CLAIM and issue a Protective Order regarding their safety related to their litigation of Court Case H-08-60, Houston, Texas. . . . Currently, the Menchaca family litigates in the U.S. Courts under threat of death as they have been denied Victim / Witness protection by U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson of the same type willingly provided by the U.S. Justice Department to Sammy 'The Bull' Gravano, a Mafioso murderer of eighteen people. . . . Said 03 April 2009 "WAR CRIME COMPLAINT" document also provides information of "USC Title 18 Crime Complaint" against certain members of the former "Bush administration " appointed U.S. Justice Department, specifically against former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, specifically against acting U.S. Attorney General Mark Filip (previously appointed 20 Jan 2009), and specifically against U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson (currently), all who perpetrated War Crimes and, through U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson , continue to perpetrate "USC Title 18 §1512 Crime Tampering" and "USC Title 18 §1513 Crime Retaliation" (Title 18 §1512 and "USC Title 18 §1513 provide 'Extra-territorial jurisdiction' in foreign venues) crimes against Kristian Menchaca Family Plaintiffs, the family of War Crime victimized PFC Kristian Menchaca who are not afforded Victim / Witness protection, while Mafioso like Sammy 'the Bull' Gravano are provided Victim / Witness protection. . . . Plaintiffs have decided "NOT" to publish most of the following questions in their litigation or in MacKenzie's several books on the 'Nuclear Crime' threats to the Holy St. Peters and St. Peter's pilgrims Basilica , but will publish several questions that relate to Tim Johnson's ministerial and discretionary scope on U.S. Victim Protection related to this "Reward" litigation.. . . . The Bush Administration has eliminated any possibility of "COMPLIMENTARITY" and Bush Administration Obstruction of War Crime Complaints continues to be the policy of the U.S. Department of Justice under the Obama Administration related to War Crime Complaints for which there is no "COMPLIMENTARITY," even regarding Complaints of

184 of 256 185 of 256

Torture-Murder War Crimes perpetrated against United States soldier Prisoners of War. . . . . The "complementarity" principle indicates that certain crime offenses are complementary. If two crime offenses are complementary, an Administration that clearly accepts only certain crime complaints will obscure the other complementary Complaints. For example, an administration that refuses to take crime reports of Geneva Convention prohibited war crime tortures and murders wherein the War Crime Complaint names U.S. Department of Justice Employees as perpetrators of Justice Obstruction crimes and War Crimes will not record any complaints related to War Crime murders even though torture-murders are crimes in the United States. This condition also establishes that only certain kinds of information can be submitted in a particular Crime Complaint recorded by the U.S. Department of Justice. Some other information that is equally important under the principal of "complementarity" will not be considered simultaneously and is obstructed. . . . For example, when Plaintiff MacKenzie complained to U.S. Department of Justice FBI Houston Office that U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson had denied the Menchaca family Victim protection related to said enclosed and cited Criminal death threat, the FBI Duty Agent explained he would not 'take' such a report and would not 'take' a crime report of 18 USC Tampering and Retaliation crime offenses, and the Menchaca family should realize that litigation brings 'death risks' that "go with the territory." The FBI Duty Agent then disconnected his phone contact with Plaintiff MacKenzie. . . . When Plaintiff MacKenzie complained to Governor Rick Perry in "Care of" Chief Master Sergeant Gonda Moncada, Public Affairs Chief, Texas National Guard, Comm 512-782-5050; DSN 954-5050, [email protected] and same office of Col William Meeham, Texas National Guard 512-782-1034 ; [email protected] ; [email protected], Public Affairs Chief Moncada disconnected her phone contact with Plaintiff MacKenzie after he explained that Texas National Guard troops faced the same "$50,000 'Death Sentence' Rewards" and consequential mutilation-torture-murders suffered by Pvt Kristian Menchaca

185 of 256 186 of 256

(Plaintiffs’ nephew), Pvt Thomas Tucker, Pvt Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez, and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty as U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, all who were tortured and murdered during various capture time periods from 2004 through July 2008. . . . Petitioner Kenneth MacKenzie has filed this current Claim and copies of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in the U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , ( http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) . The Prosecutor of the U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT has notified MacKenzie that the Prosecutor's Office will investigate the violations of the Geneva Conventions set forth in MacKenzie's filed U.S. District Court case H-08-60 and those cases MacKenzie has filed with the Ministers of Justice in Italy and Rome, Indonesia, and other Middle East. countries. . . . Plaintiff MacKenzie has complained to the Prosecutor of the U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT that U.S. Department of Justice employees will not record any complaints related to War Crime murders even though torture-murders are crimes under United States Codes. . . . This U.S. Department of Justice obstruction of "complementarity" condition also establishes that only certain kinds of information can be submitted regarding Crime Complaints recorded by the U.S. Department of Justice. Crime Complaint information related to War Crimes that is equally important under the principal of "complementarity" is ignored by the remaining Bush administration FBI, headed by FBI Director Robert Mueller, who Obstruct Justice and misprision felonies by refusing to enforce U.S. laws under the principal of "complementarity" by not recording crime complaints against U.S. Department of Justice employees who regularly obstruct justice by refusing to investigate War Crime violations of the Geneva Conventions. . . .Crime Complaint information related to War Crimes that is equally important under the principal of "complementarity" is also ignored by Governor Perry of the state of

186 of 256 187 of 256

Texas who has ignored the fact that U.S. Attorneys General have treasonably Life Reward valued Texas National Guardsmen at "$50,000 'Death' Rewards" when they are serving in a federalized situation while U.S. Attorneys General are offering 100 to 500 times more Reward life value for the lives of Terrorists . . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue Defendant U.S. Department of Justice, and Department of State, and Department of Defense, a Protective Order to protect the lives of captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq and Afghanistan and in Middle East Countries , said Protective Order of this Court directing all U.S. government Departments and Agencies to "NOT" publish or proclaim U.S. rewards for each captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War that are lower in value than the highest amount, $25,000,000, the U.S. advertises it will pay for the highest reward valued enemy of the United States, Usama Bin Ladin, currently valued at twenty five million U.S. dollars ($25,000,000), said Protective Order of this Court further directing all U.S. government Departments and Agencies to "NOT" violate the Geneva Conventions relative to captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War and "NOT" fail to "EQUALLY" publicize, worldwide, with media advertising that is at least physically EQUAL, inch by inch, to visual media advertising of display ads published regarding Rewards for Terrorists that Rewards of twenty five million U.S. dollars ($25,000,000) will be paid for live recovery of captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq and Afghanistan and radio advertising that also provides "EQUAL" or better advertising time and word count in radio advertising that Rewards of twenty five million U.S. dollars ($25,000,000) will be paid for live recovery of captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq and Afghanistan, and apply these same principles to TV advertising of sound word count, ad time duration, and photo-picture size to be at least "EQUAL" to ads on behalf of terrorists or better than ads for terrorists, said Protective Order of this Court further directing all U.S. government Departments and Agencies to "NOT" ignore any part of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Geneva Protocols of 1977 and 2005, and particularly note that provision is

187 of 256 188 of 256 stated under Geneva Convention 3, Art 10 that "The High Contracting Parties may at any time agree to entrust to an organization which offers all guarantees of impartiality and efficacy the duties incumbent on the Protecting Powers by virtue of the present Convention." . . .This Article 10 provision and others enable liaison between the U.S. and various Mosques in Afghanistan and Iraq to enable provision of Geneva Convention Law and Koranic Law mandated by Mohamed to protect Prisoners of War in cooperation with all parties. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect the lives of the Menchaca family until such time as these Terrorism threats are no longer an issue. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect the Holy St. Peters from "Nuclear Crime" attack related to the U.S. War prosecution in Iraq and Afghanistan. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect the Tomb of Mohamed in Medina, Italy and Rome from "Nuclear Crime" attack related to the U.S. War prosecution in Iraq and Afghanistan. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect Holy St. Peter's Basilica from "Nuclear Crime" attack related to U.S. War prosecution in Iraq and Afghanistan. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant an Order to Show Cause why the U.S. should or should not offer "Radiological Crime" Protection to the Holy St. Peters, Vatican, Italy and Rome. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant an Order to Show Cause why the U.S. should or should not offer "Radiological Crime" Protection to the Tomb of Mohamed, Medina, Italy and Rome. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant an Order to Show Cause why the U.S. should or should not offer "Radiological Crime" Protection to the U.S. Business Entities in Italy and Rome in an effort to protect the Holy St. Peters, Vatican, Italy and Rome from

188 of 256 189 of 256

Radiological Cross-Contamination as is expected to come from Radiological attack against U.S. Business property in Italy and Rome. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant an Order to Show Cause why the U.S. should or should not offer "Radiological Crime" Protection to the U.S. Business Entities in Italy in an effort to protect Holy St. Peter's pilgrims Church, Vatican City, in Rome, Italy from Radiological Cross-Contamination as is expected to come from Radiological attack against U.S. Business property in Italy. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant and to fifty US state governors to "show cause" why they should not forewarn State National Guard troops of said insufficient "$50,000 'Death' Rewards" that directly impact Texas National Guard troops when 'federalized' into the federal military of the United States. . . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant and to fifty U.S. state governors and U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Secretary of State and "Order to 'Show Cause' " why U.S. Bush administration "fifty thousand dollar torture-death 'rewards'" offered by U.S. for captured U.S. soldier prisoners of war should continue to remain in effect after bush administration has vacated office of presidency of the United States. BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX #1, of Internet Addresses regarding Terrorist torture videos showing the torture deaths of PFC Kristian Menchaca and PFC Thomas Tucker : Disclaimer Warning: These web addresses contain shocking atrocity photos, not for children and teenage persons under 18 years of age: “Click” or shade & paste Web address in browser bar, then click “GO.” (1) SEE: Video Of Beaheadings Of Americans Kristian Menchaca And Thomas (2) SEE: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&q=kristian+menchaca+video (3) SEE: http://www.google.com/search?q=kristian+menchaca+video&hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&start=10&sa=N (4) SEE: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/abducted-gis-uncle-discusses-case/1469898569?icid=acvsv1 (5) SEE: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-

189 of 256 190 of 256

06,GGLD:en&q=kristian+menchaca+video (6) SEE: http://www.google.com/search?q=kristian+menchaca+video&hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&start=10&sa=N (7) SEE: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/abducted-gis-uncle-discusses- () SEE: case/1469898569?icid=acvsv1 (8) http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/184744.php (9) http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/183865.php (10) http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/beheading_desecration_ Page 37 of 45 Page 38 of 45 video_of_dead_us_soldiers_released_on_internet_by_al_qaeda_videoimages/ (11) http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/beheading_desecration_ video_of_dead_us_soldiers_released_on_internet_by_al_qaeda_videoimages/ ` ( 11) http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&q=menchaca+graphic+footage+videos (12) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&q=menchaca+graphic+footage+videos&start=10&sa=N (13) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&q=menchaca+graphic+footage+videos&start=20&sa=N (14) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&q=menchaca+graphic+footage+videos&start=30&sa=N (15) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004- 06,GGLD:en&pwst=1&q=menchaca+graphic+footage+videos&start=40&sa=N (16) Video Of Beaheadings Of Americans Kristian Menchaca And Thomas www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001752.html (17) The Jawa Report: Beheading Desecration Video of Dead U.S. Soldiers ... Jul 10, 2006 ... mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/183865.php (18) Kristian Menchaca and Thomas Tucker’s Kidnapper Caught ... www.blogsofwar.com/2006/06/20/bodies-of-pvt-kristian-menchaca-and-pvt-thomas-tucker-reportedly-found/ - 89k - Cached (19) Beheading Desecration Video of Dead U.S. Soldiers Released on Internet by al ... The two victims, Kristian Menchaca and Thomas Tucker, were members of the ... www.hyscience.com/archives/2006/07/beheading_desec.php (20) Beheading video of US soldiers by the adherents of the “religion ...

190 of 256 191 of 256

Jul 10, 2006 ... bamapachyderm.com/.../ (21) The Jawa Report: New Tucker and Menchaca Video: Bodies Desecrated ... Sep 23, 2006 ... new footage and ... mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/184744.php (22) U.S. Soldiers Beheaded by al Qaeda (Video/Images) » Jul 10, 2006 ... extremely graphic footage is preceded by an audio clip of a past Usama ... Tucker and Pfc. Kristian Menchaca Mutilation Video Released. ... www.outsidethebeltway.com/.../ http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/beheading_desecration_ video_of_dead_us_soldiers_released_on_internet_by_al_qaeda_videoimages/ BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX #2 of Internet Addresses regarding Geneva Conventions I, II, 111, IV, of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977 and 2005: Page 38 of 45 Page 39 of 45 http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/genevaconventions ; http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva02.htm ; http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva03.htm ; http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva07.htm ; Submitted by Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie Plaintiff’s signature : S/ Kenneth MacKenzie, title : Pro Se, Properia Persona, Plaintiff / Petitioner / Complainant Plaintiff member of Kristian Menchaca Family of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 - Houston, TX; Home address: Page 39 of 45 Page 40 of 45 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (1) Kenneth MacKenzie, appearing Properia Persona as Plaintiff “Pro Se” appearing on his own behalf with family class members similarly situated, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, as Plaintiff, Aunt of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca (sister of Claimant Guadalupe Vasquez), (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, as Plaintiff, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez

191 of 256 192 of 256

Menchaca, Mother of (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, as Plaintiff, Brother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, family class members similarly situated — PETITIONERS Class Action regarding: (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims VS Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States — RESPONDENT(S) PROOF OF SERVICE I, Kenneth MacKenzie, do swear or declare that on this date, 30 April 2009, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The names and addresses of those served are as follows: U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States; Erik Holder, Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20530; TO: Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Office of the Solicitor General, Care Of Neal Katyal, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: 202-514-2217/18 hours 9:00 am to 5:30 pm, M-F 202-514-2203 [email protected] , . . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR- 100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email otp.informationdesk@icccpi.

192 of 256 193 of 256 int , ( http:/ /www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 30 April 2009 (Signature) Printed name: Kenneth MacKenzie No.08-9595

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (1) Kenneth MacKenzie, appearing Properia Persona as Plaintiff “Pro Se” appearing on his own behalf with family class members similarly situated, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, as Plaintiff, Aunt of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca (sister of Claimant Guadalupe Vasquez), (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, as Plaintiff, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, Mother of (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, as Plaintiff, Brother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, family class members similarly situated — PETITIONERS Class Action regarding: (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims Vs Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States — RESPONDENT(S) PROOF OF SERVICE I, Kenneth MacKenzie, do swear or declare that on this date, 30 April 2009, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The names and addresses of those served are as follows: U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States; Erik Holder, Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE:

193 of 256 194 of 256

Houston/Galveston Division: Mail: P.O. Box 61129 , Houston, TX 77208; TO: Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Office of the Solicitor General, Care Of Neal Katyal, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: 202-514-2217/18 hours 9:00 am to 5:30 pm, M-F 202-514-2203 [email protected] , . . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR- 100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, [email protected] , ( http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 30 April 2009 (Signature) Printed name: Kenneth MacKenzie

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE / CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (X Via ECF) . . . . . To: Mailing Address of the Solicitor General of the United States (see Rule 29.4) . .TO: Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Office of the Solicitor General, Care Of Neal Katyal, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: 202-514-2217/18 hours 9:00 am to 5:30 pm, M-F 202-514-2203 [email protected] , . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTPCR- 100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , ( http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) . . . . . To: President of The United States and Counsel to President of the United States Fax: 202- 456-2883; Phn: 202 456-2632

194 of 256 195 of 256

. . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] Defense Attaché Office, US Embassy, 24 Grosvenor Square, London W1A 1AE ; Phone: [44] (0) 20 7894-0723; Fax:[44] (0) 20 7499-7688 ; Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] . . . . . TO: United States Attorney General Erik Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 2053 ;US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC - (202) 353-1555 , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , . . . . . TO: United States Attorney Attorney General Mukasey, Care Of: UNITED STATES Page 42 of 45 Page 43 of 45 ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Tim Johnson, Houston, P.O. Box 61129, Houston, TX 77208; 8- 5 M-F: (713) 718-3310; U.S. Atty. (713) 567-9000 FBI 713-693-5000 ; [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ; [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,[email protected] ,

195 of 256 196 of 256 [email protected] , [email protected] . . . TO: Captain Weiskopf & Commander, ATTN: IACS-SMIO-PAO, 8825 Beulah Street , Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5246, INSCOM Phone: (703) 428-4965 ; INSCOM Pentagon 703- 697-4200 ; Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Page 43 of 45 Page 44 of 45 . . . TO: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, U.S. Special Counsel; jeffrey.kerr ; heather.cartwright ; cathy.spears; Office of U.S. Special Counsel, and To U.S. National Security Division, U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DoJ), Office of Justice for Victims of Overseas Terrorism; and an Executive Office. or 202-514-1057; jeffrey.kerr: 202-616-3581 ; heather.cartwright: 202-514-1057; ; cathy.spears: 202 307 -6649 ; eMail : [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; . . . TO: George Hephner, Deputy U.S. Marshall, 515 Rusk, Houston, TX 77002, 713 718 4800; [email protected] ______. . I hereby certify that the above and foregoing instrument was served upon Defendants and Interested Parties and their counsel in the above entitled and numbered cause at their office eMail addresses as indicated at their "published" Internet Web sites by Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Attorney Pro SE, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, H. Phone: 713-225-0123 ; Cell : 281 684 6028; [email protected] , [email protected] , U.S. Court Case H-08-60; KENNETH MACKENZIE, the undersigned, further certifies that he has served the U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General numerous times at their Web site Electronic Mail

196 of 256 197 of 256 addresses, served them at U.S. White House Electronic Mail Addresses, at the Department of Defense Electronic Mail addresses: [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], Page 44 of 45 Page 45 of 45 Complainant’s signature : S/ Kenneth MacKenzie, Printed name : Kenneth MacKenzie; title : Pro Se, Properia Persona, Complainant / Plaintiff member of Kristian Menchaca Family of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 - Houston, TX;

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 12 . . . Pg. 198 U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF #3 : WAR CRIME COMPLAINT AGAINST Gray Miller, Defendant in his private persona 'aka' U.S. Judge Gray Miller (Defendant Gray Miller)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Kenneth MacKenzie,Guadalupe Vasquez, . } Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, (Petitioners) . . } v...... } No. 08-9595 United States (Respondent), ...... } U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15:

197 of 256 198 of 256

U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL ELANA. . . . . } PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF #3 KAGAN, Counsel for Respondent,...... } (Respondents) ...... } ...... U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF #3 : . . . Plaintiffs submit Rule 15 PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF #3 as follows: Supreme Court of the United States Washington, DC 20543-001, [email protected] United States of America ...... } Case No. 08-9595 v...... } WAR CRIME COMPLAINT Gray Miller, Defendant ...... } U.S. Judge Gray Miller (Defendant Gray Miller) ...... CRIMINAL COMPLAINT #3 I, Kenneth MacKenzie, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. On or about the date of February 2008 in the county of Harris in city of Houston, the Southern District of Texas, the defendant violated offenses described as follows: . . . Defendant Gray Miller acting outside his ministerial and descretionary scope having usurped jurisdiction of a court case in conflict of interest and in violation of 28 USC, Section 455, taking wrongful jurisdiction not his to take, "violated" (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims. SEE: http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/genevaconventions ; http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva02.htm ; http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/law ofwar/geneva03.htm ; http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva07.htm ; "violated" (2) Protocol I and II Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Also SEE: Protocol I, Page 1 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 2 of 31 Article 11 – Protection of persons, 8 June 1977. See: Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/genevaconventions ; SEE:http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/genevaconventions ; http://www.icrc.org/Web/; . . . Defendant Gray Miller also "violated" TITLE 18 - CRIMES, CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; Defendant Gray Miller violated Title 18 USC, § 1512.

198 of 256 199 of 256

Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. . . " . . .There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section." (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=1512 ; Title 18 USC § 1512. Defendant Gray Miller, in "violation," Tampered with captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty; Defendant Gray Miller violated 18 USC; TITLE 18 § 1513 - Defendant Gray Miller Retaliated against a witness, victim, or an informant. " . . .There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section." http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/73/sections/section_ 151 3.html ; "Title 18 USC § 1513 Defendant Gray Miller Retaliated against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty); Defendant Gray Miller violated 18 U.S.C., § 4. Misprision of felonies against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, in the mutilation-torture-murders of Pvt Kristian Menchaca (Plaintiffs’ family member), Pvt Thomas Tucker, and Pvt Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty; Defendant Gray Miller violated Title 18 USC, Sec. 2382 - MISPRISION OF TREASON (18 U.S.C., § 2382 MISPRISION OF TREASON perpetrated to a math certainty by former U.S. Attorney General Gonzales in manipulating his own designed $50,000 Death Rewards against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty, meanwhile posting life-saving Mega Million dollar rewards for al Qaida and al Shura Terrorists while said Terrorists, in violation of Geneva Convention 3, tortured to death U.S. soldier Prisoners of War life-valued by Gonzales at $50,000 while Gonzales denied any reward increases on their lives while Gonzales's Higher life valued Terrorists surrogates tortured said U.S. Prisoners of War to Death in violation of Geneva Page 2 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 3 of 31 Convention 3).

199 of 256 200 of 256

Defendant Gray Miller's MISPRISION is understood as follows: In its larger sense, this word is used to signify every considerable misdemeanor, which has not a certain name given to it in the law; and it is said that a misprision is contained in every treason or felony whatever. In its narrower sense it is the concealment of a crime. Defendant Gray Miller's MISPRISION OF TREASON is the concealment of treason, by being merely passive for if any assistance be given, to the traitor, it makes the party a principal, as there are no accessories in treason. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision. Misprisions which are merely positive, are denominated contempts or high misdemeanors; as, for example, dissuading a witness from giving evidence. Defendant Gray Miller's MISPRISION OF FELONY - Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the U.S., conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the U.S. 18 USC. Misprision of felony, is the like concealment of felony, without giving any degree of maintenance to the felon for if any aid be given him, the party becomes an accessory after the fact. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel officer of United States to perform his duty. Defendant Gray Miller did not perform his duty while he did nothing while captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty were tortured and murdered from February to July 2008. . . . . Also see: Koranic Law of Middle East Countries. This criminal complaint is based on these facts: . 1. The information of this issue indicates that captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty were murdered during the time period of 22 Feb 2008 to 08 July 2008, during the same time period that U.S. Judge Miller, outside his ministerial and discretionary scope, did deny Plaintiffs’ efforts to provide $25 Million Dollar Rewards to save the lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty -- on a Reward life value equal to said $25 Million U.S. Reward dollars bestowed by Page 3 of 31

200 of 256 201 of 256

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 4 of 31 the U.S. Executive Branch on Terrorists. . 2. SEE: Rewards for Justice, Washington , D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927; [email protected]; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/ http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english . 3. This statistic and the dollar difference in Rewards is profound evidence that "$50,000 'Death Sentence' Rewards" are a catastrophic part of mutilation,torture, and murder "War Crimes" motivated against captured U.S. soldier Prisoneers of War in Iraq and in violation of Geneva Convention III of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977. . 4. U.S. Citizens who volunteer for Military Service are not forewarned that if they are captured by Terrorists in Iraq or Afghanistan their own government will betray them and offer rewards for them that are 500 times lower than the U.S. government offers for the very same Mega Million / $25 Million Dollar valued terrorists who will mutilate and torture the same captured U.S. soldier Prisoneers of War reward-valued 500 time less at "$50,000 'Death Sentence' Rewards." The irony and treachery are astounding and most shocking. .5. Complaint against U.S. Judge Gray Miller as corruptly acting in Private Persona outside his ministerial and discretionary scope: . 6. . This “5th Circuit Rule, Judicial Misconduct Complaint” against U.S. Judge Gray Miller (1) describes pre-jurisdiction and pre-decision disqualification conditions that were a matter of record and obvious from the facts available to Judge Gray Miller before he wrongfully acted to expropriate wrongful jurisdiction and then issue a decision in U.S. Case H-08-60 while he was disqualified pursuant to 28 USC, Section 455, in “conflict-of-interest,” while he was “disqualified” outside his ministerial and discretionary scope, by reason of the fact that Miller was a President-GW-Bush nominee / appointee had knowingly taken jurisdiction of Case H-08-60, which listed Bush and several of his Cabinet Secretaries as Interested Parties who were likely to become “Defendants.” . 7. . Miller possessed obviously available information that Miller was a nominee / appointee of President G.W. Bush to Miller’s position of U.S. District Court Judge. . 8. Miller possessed obviously available information from the Caption (See Appendix 1, appended herein) in Plaintiff’s case H-08-60 that President G.W. Bush was named as an “interested Party” in Plaintiff’s case H-08-60.

201 of 256 202 of 256

. 9. Miller possessed obviously available information that Plaintiff’s Case H-08-60 named in the Page 4 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 5 of 31 caption former U.S. Attorney General Gonzales (a Bush nominated / appointed U.S. Attorney General) and was informed that Plaintiff’s Case H-08-60 named, in the caption (See Appendix 1, appended herein), a substantial number of Bush nominated / appointed Cabinet Secretaries as “Interested Parties.” . 10. Miller possessed obviously available information of “USC Title 28, Section 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” . 11. “The thing speaks for itself” (Res Ips Loquitor) that USC Title 28, Section 455 was clearly applicable or, at least, of question for Miller in Plaintiff’s Case H-08-60. . 12. “The thing speaks for itself” (Res Ips Loquitor) that Miller did not query the Judicial Council of the Fifth Judicial Circuit to ask an opinion regarding Miller’s plans to commandeer jurisdiction as President Bush’s protégé, nominee / appointee, to expropriate jurisdiction of Plaintiff’s Case H-08-60 away from other U.S. District Court judges who were “NOT” protégés, nominees, or appointees of President G.W. Bush and were not linked as nominees / appointees of the U.S. Executive Branch Culture of Torture that has provably worked to destroy the lives of captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War. “The thing speaks for itself” (Res Ips Loquitor). . 13. Plaintiff’s complaint focuses on several basic areas regarding said unlawfully expropriated decision of Miller to take jurisdiction away from other better qualified U.S. judges despite Miller’s obvious “conflict of interest” disqualification under 28 USC, Section 455, before Miller issued decisions in Case-08-60. .14. Miller took jurisdiction by snaking around the proscriptions of 28 USC, Section 455 and surreptitiously not notifying Plaintiffs of his identification as a Bush nominee / appointee; and, Miller took jurisdiction by not querying the Judicial Council of the Fifth Judicial Circuit to determine its opinion on Miller’s decision to take jurisdiction when there were numerous valid questions against Miller taking jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 fully informed he was a Bush nominee / appointee and disqualified under Title 28, Section 455 prior to taking jurisdiction. . 15. Furthermore, Miller did not take jurisdiction under verification or sworn oath that he was not

202 of 256 203 of 256 subject to disqualification under Title 28, Section 455, or under verification or sworn oath that he was not acting outside his ministerial and discretionary scope in conflict as a Bush Nominee / Appointee. . 16. The information of Case H-08-60 explained that part of Plaintiffs’ litigation of Case H-08-60 Page 5 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 6 of 31 was seeking and offering rewards of $25 Million (See Appendix 2 and also see http://kristianmenchaca.com/) expected to come from jury verdicts in Case H-08-60 on behalf of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. In conjunction with information of Case H-08-60, Plaintiffs were offering rewards of $25 Million on the internet (See Appendix 2) linked to litigation of Case H-08-60 in efforts to save the lives of Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty who were facing mutilation, torture, and death in Iraq . . 17. Miller ignored the plight of Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty when he snaked around the proscriptions of USC Title 28, Section 455 and wrongfully took jurisdiction apparently focused on dismissing Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 against his mentor, Bush, and his mentor’s Attorneys General and Cabinet Secretaries. . 18. Miller denied Plaintiffs’ Application To Proceed Without Payment Of Fee in Case H-08-60 on 25 Feb 2008; and, Plaintiffs never received information of Miller’s said denial from the Court Clerk. Miller’s said “Denial” was issued outside his Ministerial and Discretionary scope by reason of the facts indicating he was not qualified to take jurisdiction because he was disqualified pursuant to 28 USC, Section 455 in his “Conflict of Interest.” . 19. Miller’s wrongful denial of 25 Feb 2008 thereby had catastrophic consequences for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty -- who Miller ignored when he issued his denial, which had the effect of allowing unchallenged continuance of said U.S. Executive Branch issued “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards,” effectively motivating Terrorists to mutilate, torture, and murder captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in “War Crime” violations of Geneva Convention III of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977 as further explained, herein. . 20. Linked to Miller’s Denial and bizarre refusal to address the life and death issues of Case H-08- 60 and Miller instead focus on the $450 filing fee marks Miller and reveals his unbalanced state of

203 of 256 204 of 256 mind in that he focused on trivia while the lives of three captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War hung in the balance endangered by Miller’s Denial and delays of Case H-08-60. . 21. Miller, by taking jurisdiction outside his ministerial and discretionary scope as disqualified under 28 Section 455 and by wrongfully denying Plaintiffs’ life saving efforts of Case H-08-60 on 25 Feb 2008, Miller effectively removed any lawful potential for change in said U.S. Executive Branch issued Page 6 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 7 of 31 “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards.” . 22. Thus, Miller, disqualified under Title 28, Section 455 and then acting in his Private Persona, issued an unlawful denial in Case H-08-60 which prevented Case H-08-60 from going forward to make life saving efforts on behalf of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez, and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. . 23. Disqualified under Title 28, Section 455 and by denying Case H-08-60 to go forward in a timely manner to publich “equal-to-terrorist-$25-Million-reward-conditions” of $25 million dollar Rewards on behalf of the lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez, and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty, Miller, acting in his Private Persona, did interfere with Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 and prevented “equal-to-terrorist-$25-Million-reward-conditions” from being heard by a jury in a timely manner. . 24. As a connected result of Miller’s wrongdoing in making the $450 filing fee a more important focus of Case H-08-60 than the lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, while Miller acted outside the ministerial and discretionary scope of U.S. District Court Judge and, instead, acted in his Private Persona as “Gray Miller,” the body of Sgt. Keith Maupin was recovered in Iraq on 30 March 2008, and the bodies of Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty were recovered on 09 July 2008. . 25. The fact that Miller acted in the above described manner indicates Miller is unbalanced in his mental abilities to recognize that there is a profound difference between life and death issues compared to the trivia of his emphasis on the $450 filing fee. . 26. In conformance with 5th Cir. R., Plaintiff is not disputing Miller’s wrongful denial of Plaintiffs’ Application To Proceed Without Payment Of Fee in Case H-08-60 even though Miller’s denial should have no standing. Plaintiff MacKenzie is pointing out the obvious conditions that existed before Miller

204 of 256 205 of 256 took wrongful jurisdiction and issued his wrongful Denial. . 27. It should be noted that there are four family Plaintiffs listed in Case H-08-60. Julieta Vasquez- MacKenzie the Aunt of Kristian Menchaca is unemployed, without funds, and should have right to proceed under Forma Pauperis, yet was denied by Miller while acting outside his ministerial and descretionary scope disqualified under Title 28 Section 455, then acting in his Private Persona as Gray Miller (not “U.S. Judge Gray Miller”). . 28. Cesar Menchaca, brother of Kristian Menchaca is unemployed, without funds, and should have Page 7 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 8 of 31 right to proceed under Forma Pauperis, yet was denied by Miller while acting outside his ministerial and descretionary scope disqualified under Title 28 Section 455, then acting in his Private Persona as Gray Miller (not “U.S. Judge Gray Miller”). . 29. Maria Guadalupe Vasquez, mother of Christian Menchaca, under employed based on her economic condition, should have right to proceed under Forma Pauperis, yet was denied by Miller while acting outside his ministerial and descretionary scope disqualified under Title 28 Section 455, then acting in his Private Persona as Gray Miller (not “U.S. Judge Gray Miller”). .30. Kenneth MacKenzie was allowed to proceed in U.S. District Court to U.S. Supreme Court twice under his current economic profile in U.S. Supreme Court cases 95-9090 and 97-7616, yet was denied Application To Proceed Without Payment Of Fee in Case H-08-60 in Miller’s denial of 25 Feb 2008, by Miller while acting outside his ministerial and descretionary scope disqualified under Title 28 Section 455, then acting in his Private Persona as Gray Miller (not “U.S. Judge Gray Miller”).. . 31. Plaintiffs’ filed Case H-08-60 seeking orders to make rewards equally available to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War; and, Plaintiffs sought damages to be paid by Defendant Gonzales to the Vasquez Menchaca family, while listing several “Interested Parties” including Bush as possible Defendants should investigation indicate they were culpable in the wrongful death of Plaintiffs’ family member, PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, who was captured by Terrorist insurgents, during June 2006, together with PFC Thomas Tucker in Yosifiya, Iraq and both barbarically tortured to death largely as a consequence said discriminatory “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” broadcast by the U.S. government after their surrender / capture (not before surrender / capture). . 32. Plaintiffs’ complaint is that Judge Gray Miller wrongfully took jurisdiction of this Case H-08-60

205 of 256 206 of 256 in disregard of Title 28, Section 455; and, after taking jurisdiction, Miller’s Denial of Plaintiffs’ Application to Proceed Without Payment was made outside Miller’s ministerial and discretionary scope and made in a condition that was a violation of Title 28, Section 455 regarding Case H-08-60. . 33. In retrospect of Miller taking jurisdiction of Case H-08-60, after the facts are considered that former Attorney General Gonzales is listed as a Defendant, President Bush’s name is listed as a “PARTY,” and a large number of Bush Cabinet Secretary appointees are listed as “Interested Parties” in H-08-60, why did Judge Miller not “do what is easy” and simply allow another judge who was not a Bush nominee / appointee take jurisdiction of H-08-60? The obvious answer to the obvious answer is that Miller obviously was obviously motivated by some interest to protect his Mentor, G.W. Bush and Page 8 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 9 of 31 his several Cabinet Secretaries from facing the unpleasant prospect of answering for their structured and minipulated U.S. “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” against captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War that targeted them after capture motivating the very same Terrorist groups who were beneficiaries of life saving Mega Million/$25 Million Dollar Rewards to mutilate, torture, and murder “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’…” targeted U.S. soldiers ruthlessly denied “Fourteenth Amendment” equality of Terrorist life saving Mega Million/$25 Million Dollar Rewards that proveably saved the lives of all 100% of Terrorists who surrendered in Iraq, while U.S. “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” ruthlessly targeted and motivated the mutilation, torture, and murder of all 100% of captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War in Iraq, said Mega Million/$25 Million Dollar life Rewards contrasting to “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” and thereby illustrating a relentlessly targeted low life value to captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War in criminal violation of Geneva Conventions and also in criminal violation of the U.S.RICO Act and U.S. Treason Act by encouraging and motivating Terrorist organization enemies of the United States (whose members benefitted after surrender by said Mega Million/$25 Million Dollar Rewards that motivated their Iraqi Sunni and Shiite and Kurdish captors not to mutilate, torture and murder them after capture) to mutilate, torture, and murder all 100% of captured U.S. soldier prisoners of War. . 34. From Petitioners’ common sense point of view in this matter, Judge Gray Miller appears to be mentally disabled, or worse, which indicates he may be as mentally disabled as those in the U.S. Executive Branch whose life destroying reward policies he appears to support.

206 of 256 207 of 256

. 35. Judge Gray Miller’s decision to take jurisdiction of Plaintiffs’ U.S. District Court Case H-08-60, Houston, after being presented with the Case H-08-60 caption listing former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales as Defendant (Gonzales was a President-G.W.-Bush-appointee, like Miller), after being presented with the Case H-08-60 caption listing as “Interested-Parties,” members of the U.S. Executive Branch selected by Bush, and after being presented with the Case H-08-60 caption listing President G.W. Bush as an “Interested Party,” President G.W. Bush being the very same party who had nominated Miller to his decision-making position as District Court judge, Miller wrongfully took “conflict-of-interest” jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 when it was flooded with “Interested Parties,” including President Bush, whose presence in Case H-08-60 indicated an “extreme-conflict-of-interest” should Miller take jurisdiction of Case H-08-60. . 36. SEE: “USC Title 28, Section 455. Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge Page 9 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 10 of 31 (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: (1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding; . 37. Miller took jurisdiction informed by the caption in Case H-08-60 of the names of the listed Executive Branch Defendant, Attorney General Gonzales (nominated by Bush), and the Interested Parties, including Miller’s mentor, President G.W. Bush, listed on the caption of Case H-08-60, which jurisdiction was immediately apparent as a “conflict of interest” to Miller due to the fact that Bush had nominated Miller to Miller’s position as District Court judge; and, obviously if Miller took jurisdiction, then Miller could repay Bush’s nomination favor by dismissing Case H-08-60 civil crime tort complaints against Bush and his Executive Branch Attorney Generals and Bush’s Cabinet Secretaries and dismissing Case H-08-60 civil crime tort complaints against Bush, himself, wherein Bush and his Executive Branch Secretaries and Attorneys General could reasonably be named as Defendants in Case H-08-60 should further facts indicate Bush and his Secretaries ought to be named as Defendants. . 39. Miller took jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 informed that :

207 of 256 208 of 256

(1) he was in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona. (2) Miller took jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 informed that “USC Title 28, Section 455 applied: “(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned . . .” (3) Miller took jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 surreptitiously without informing Petitioners he was a Bush nominee / appointee, (4) took jurisdiction in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona obviously intent on issuing a denial that would likely operate to also deny “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” in Iraq and Afghanistan any opportunity at equal Life saving $25 Million Rewards that could come from Case H-08-60 and thereby save their lives in the same manner as said $25 Million dollar Rewards were saving the lives of Terrorists who surrendered in Iraq; Page 10 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 11 of 31 (5) Miller in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acted in his Private Person Persona while ignoring “USC Title 28, Section 455, … ‘(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding’; (6) Before Miller took jurisdiction of Case H-08-60, in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona, he was informed by Case H-08-60 of the following concerns on pages 343 and 344 of Plaintiffs’ primary Geneva Convention & RICO Crime complaints, wherein Plaintiffs’ were seeking damages and Court orders in an effort to save the lives of “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” targeted with U.S. “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” offered in Iraq and Afghanistan, Plaintiffs’ litigation of Case H-08-60 offering rewards of $25 Million expected to come from jury verdicts on behalf of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – and Plaintiffs offering rewards of $25 Million on the internet linked to litigation of Case H-08-60, said Reward Life Values sought by Plaintiffs to come from expected judgements in Case H-08-60 and to come from Reward donations sought by Plaintiffs to be made by

208 of 256 209 of 256 the U.S. public to Reward Funds that Plaintiffs sought to establish as connected to Case H-08-60, under jurisdiction of the Court. . 40. SEE: U.S. Case H-08-60 ( Houston, Texas ) ¶ “...488. order that that U.S. Attorney General Mukasey (In Office: 09 Nov 2007)-Rice-Gates be restrained from administratively ‘bad-faith’ manipulating further torture-murders together with terrorist accessories, at large, and all previous reward offers based on said Title 1, “Counterterrorism fund,” Title 18, Title 22, and other U.S. Code Titles on “Rewards” for captured U.S. troops and “Rewards” for captured Terrorists be totaled and future rewards from said fund be offered as a $25 million dollar reward offered for each captured U.S. soldier returned alive into U.S. custody, said $25 million dollar rewards for U.S. Soldiers’ life-value to at least equal for U.S. Soldiers the rate of $25 million dollar rewards currently offered ($77 million previously paid) to save the lives of terrorists. . 41. Apparently, the current U.S. Attorney General Mukasey (09 Nov 2007) , and Secretary Of State Rice intend to continue to administratively ‘bad-faith’ violate the U.S. Treason Act and deny equal life saving rewards allocated from said U.S. `Counterterrorism Fund' reward money provisioned under USC TITLE I, Section 101 and under “TITLE 18, §ection 3071, Section 3072, and 22 U.S.C. Section Page 11 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 12 of 31 2708, money provisioned for the release of Spc. Alex R. Jimenez, 25, of Lawrence, Massachusetts, and (5) Pvt. Byron W. Fouty, 19, of Waterford, Michigan, captured 12 May 2007, 2007 in Al Taqa, Iraq; and, … intend to stand by to allow Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty to be tortured to death as were 101st Airborne Division soldiers Pfc. Kristian Menchaca, 23, of Houston, Texas, and Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, 25, of Madras, Oregon. Therefore, it is most urgent that Mukasey (09 Nov 2007) -Rice-Gates be restrained from administratively ‘bad-faith’ manipulating further torture-muders together with terrorist accessories, at large, who have demonstrated they commit war crimes against $50,000 low reward captured U.S. soldiers and violate the Geneva Conventions (I, III, IV), and, Geneva Convention Protocols I and II relative to the treatment of PRISONERS OF WAR.” .42. Therefore, again, more U.S. Soldiers are certain to be tortured, while the current U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey (09 Nov 2007) and Secretary Of State Rice watch, meanwhile withholding previously allocated reward money, already to be paid from said U.S. `Counterterrorism Fund,' reward

209 of 256 210 of 256 money provisioned under USC TITLE I, Section 101 and under “TITLE 18, §ection 3071, Section 3072, and ignoring 22 U.S.C. Section 2708 to save the lives of war prisoners Maupin, Jimenez and Fouty... . 43. Without signing any oath directly answering Title 28, Section 455, in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona, Miller took jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 and issued his denial which somehow never reached Plaintiffs in the mail; and, Miller then did nothing while said captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – were murdered, while denied by Bush and Miller the higher $25 million Dollar Rewards that protected the terrorists Bush and Miller protected with said $25 million Dollar Rewards while denying same to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. .44 While Miller did nothing in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona, the death notifications regarding all three of said captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin (body found 30 Mar 2008), Spc. Alex R. Jimenez (body found 09 Jul 2008) and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty (body found 09 Jul 2008) -- became published in the news media. Page 12 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 13 of 31 . 45. Miller’s said denial in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona on Case H-08-60 and essential denial of immediate jury trial and delays caused by the circumstances of Miller’s behavior essentially maintained the operation of U.S. Executive Branch treasonable “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards,” which previously had been instrumental in the mutilation-torture-murders of Pvt Kristian Menchaca (Plaintiffs’ family member), Pvt Thomas Tucker, and Pvt Joseph Anziak, all who were not informed at enlistment that the U.S. Executive Branch had plans to slander, defame, betray, and otherwise lower their Reward life values 500 times below the lives of Terrorist enemies of the United States during Wartime to such an extent that said treasonable “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” essentially established that the lives of “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” were essentially valued at a level of “TRASH,” at 500 times less than the lives of Terrorist enemies of

210 of 256 211 of 256 the United States. . 46. Said treasonable “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” that Miller manipulated to "continue- inprogress" was maintained by Miller making the U.S. Court filing fee more important than higher life saving $25 Million Rewards for captured US soldier Prisoners Of War, thereby in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona not allowing immediate processing of Plaintiffs’ Case H- 08-60, which sought to raise the “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” to a higher level of $25 Million equal to those life saving $25 Million Rewards the U.S. advertised and paid on behalf of terrorist enemies of the United States, while Pvt Kristian Menchaca (Plaintiffs’ family member), Pvt Thomas Tucker, and Pvt Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin (body found 30 Mar 2008), Spc. Alex R. Jimenez (body found 09 Jul 2008) and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty (body found 09 Jul 2008) were tortured to death and murdered by the very same terrorists who were beneficiaries of said higher “mega-million-to-$25- Million-dollar” life Rewards as advertised by Defendant Gonzales and the U.S. Executive Branch “Interested Parties,” Attorney Generals Ashcroft and Mukasey, Secretaries Rice, Rumsfeld, and Gates at U.S. Department of State and Department of Justice “Rewards For Justice” Web sites. . 47. SEE: Rewards for Justice, Washington , D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927; [email protected]; http:// www.rewardsforjustice.net/ http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english . 48. There are many reasons why Judge Gray Miller obviously should have not taken wrongful Page 13 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 14 of 31 “Conflict-of-Interest” jurisdiction of Case H-08-60; however, Miller’s wrongful application of “Bush- Conflict-of-Interest” misappropriation of jurisdiction and Miller’s wrongful application of “Bush- Conflict-of-Interest” authority could have easily been assigned to another U.S. District Court judge, essentially assigned to a non-Bush nominee not in conflict. . 49. However, Miller grabbed a “Bush-Conflict-of-Interest” expropriation- control of Case H-08-60 and enabled himself as a self-appointed surrogate of Bush in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona to deny Plaintiffs any opportunity for a public trial that would

211 of 256 212 of 256 expose the treasonable “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” structures of the U.S. Executive Branch targeting “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” with U.S. “$50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” in violation of Geneva Convention III of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977, as described in Case H-08-60. .50. Miller’s “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona had catastrophic death consequences for the remaining three terrorist-captured U.S. soldier Prisoners Of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – whose lives might well have been saved by timely application of the U.S. Rewards that Plaintiffs sought to equalize, in balance with the equalprotection- of-the-law provisions of the U.S. Fourteenth Amendment, as equal in value to the Mega- Million dollar rewards the U.S. Executive Branch was then currently advertising and paying-out, and paying-out on behalf of captured terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan, which had the effect of saving the lives of “at-large” terrorists who surrendered, as said U.S. mega-million-dollar Rewards were advertised at U.S. government Department of Justice and Department of State published “Rewards For Justice” Web sites. .51. SEE: Rewards for Justice, Washington , D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927; [email protected]; http:// www.rewardsforjustice.net/ http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english . 52. Miller’s wrongful “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona in application of “Bush-Conflict-of-Interest” judicial authority to deny Plaintiffs’ Application to proceed to hearing and immediate trial of Case H-08-60, essentially interfered with life saving U.S. Reward Page 14 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 15 of 31 publications of “Fourteenth Amendment Equal-to-terrorist-$25 Million Dollar Rewards for Captured U.S. Soldiers” on behalf of the lives of Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty, who were then, 22 Feb 2008 being held as terrorist-captured U.S. soldier Prisoners Of War in Iraq and facing barbaric mutilation, torture, and murder at the hands of their terrorist captors. Hearing and immediate trial of Case H-08-60 would undoubtedly have changed all this had not Miller

212 of 256 213 of 256 expropriated jurisdiction away from other U.S. judges who were not self-appointed Henchmen for the U.S. Executive Branch White House. . 53. Plaintiffs waited on Miller’s decision regarding their “Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee” (Forma Pauperis) from February to June 2008. Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie then contacted the Court Clerk to determine if the Court assessed additional charges to issue Summons in Case H-08-60. The Clerk explained that Miller had denied Plaintiffs’ “Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee” on 25 Feb 2008 and the Clerk had mailed him a copy of Judge Miller’s Denial during February 2008. . 54. Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie explained he was unaware of Miller’s denial, had never received notice of Miller’s Denial in the mail, and requested a copy from the U.S. District Court Clerk. . 55. Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie then filed an Appeal of Miller’s said denial with the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans . . 56. Subsequently, Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie learned from U.S. News media that Sgt. Keith Maupin’s body remains had been found, 30 March 2008, in Iraq after the U.S. Defense Department had paid more than $200,000 to Informants to reveal the location. Later, 09 Jul 2008, the U.S. News Media announced the body recoveries of Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. . 57. Based on U.S. Army intelligence that Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty were alive at the time Plaintiffs filed their lawsuit Case H-08-60, then Miller’s denial in “conflict of interest” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona on Plaintiffs’ “Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee” on 25 Feb 2008 effectively interfered with and blocked Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 efforts to save Sgt. Keith Maupin’s life by Plaintiffs’ seeking higher $25 Million Dollar ‘Fourteenth Amendment Equal’ Rewards on behalf of “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” who were apparently evaluated as “Undermen” by the Miller-supported U.S. Executive Branch at $50,000 Dollar ‘Death Sentence’ Reward, each. Page 15 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 16 of 31 . 58. Hence, Miller’s denial in “conflict of interest,” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in his Private Person Persona on Plaintiffs’ “Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee,” on 25 Feb 2008, effectively interfered

213 of 256 214 of 256 with and blocked Plaintiffs’ Case-H-08-60-sought “Fourteenth-Amendment-EQUAL-To-Terrorists” $25 Million life-saving Rewards on behalf of “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War”; and, Miller thereby corruptly and criminally denied the “U.S. Bush White House $50,000-Dollar-‘Death- Sentence’-Reward-targeted Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez, and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty an “equal chance” to be $25 Million “Reward-equal” to terrorist enemies of the United States during wartime. Essentially, in bad faith and conflict of interest, Miller deliberately, corruptly and criminally, with malice aforethought, expropriated jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 apparently with the premeditated purpose of murderously denying “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” the possibility of “equal” life saving Rewards of $25 Million that had already proven to save the lives of 100% of all Terrorists who had surrendered in Iraq. . 59. Miller’s murderously treasonable denial of Case H-08-60 efforts to save “U.S. Bush White House $50,000-Dollar-‘Death-Sentence’-Reward-targeted Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty from the treasonable effects of the “U.S. Bush White House $50,000- Dollar-‘Death-Sentence’-Rewards clearly revealed Miller’s murderous Treason against the soldiers and national defense of the United States that is outside Miller’s ministerial and discretionary scope, which proveably indicates Miller must be impeached and prosecuted for his murders and treasons against the people and military personel of the United States. . 60. Miller premeditatedly taking jurisdiction, when Title 28 Section 455 clearly indicated he should recuse himslef, shows that Miller intended to issue denials that would treasonably cost the lives of “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” as Bush’s and Miller’s record clearly illustrates. Said captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – were savagely murdered by their Terrorist Captors, while said U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were denied by Bush and Miller the higher $25 million Dollar Rewards that saved the lives of terrorists Bush and Miller protected with said $25 million Dollar Rewards while ruthlessly, relentlessly, and treasonably denying same life saving protection to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. . 61. The facts indicate that Miller had information that indicated “U.S. $50,000-Dollar-‘Death- Page 16 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 17 of 31 Sentence’-Rewards had targeted Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty,

214 of 256 215 of 256 before Miller took jurisdiction of Case H-08-60. Miller took jurisdiction that was not his to take by snaking around Title 28, Section 455 and issuing denials against Plaintiffs’ efforts to save the lives of said captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – who were savagely murdered by their Terrorist Captors, while said U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were denied by Bush and Miller the higher $25 million Dollar Rewards that saved the lives of terrorists who Bush and Miller protected with said $25 million Dollar Rewards while ruthlessly, relentlessly, and treasonably denying same life saving protection to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. . 62. Should another U.S. District Court judge, instead of Miller, have taken jurisdiction of Case H- 08-60 and allowed $25 Million dollar Rewards in defiance of the Bush U.S. Executive Branch $50K Death Rewards, it would be almost impossible for the Bush U.S. Executive Branch to appeal in front of the public as at that perticular juncture the Bush Administration would be then be publicly recognized as appealing to restore its treasonably low $50,000 Death Sentence Rewards to continue motivating Terrorists to mutilate, torture, and murder “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War” as contrasted alongside Bush-Gonzales-Rice $25 Million dollar Rewards for terrorists, which said $25 Million dollar Rewards if allowed for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War would be 14th Amendment Equal and thereby would create higher potential to save the lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War. . 63. Miller was informed of this and instead elected to corruptly expropriate jurisdiction of Case H- 08-60 when other U.S. District Court Judges could have been assigned to Case H-08-60 had Miller not expropriated Case H-08-60 for his own wrongful decision making process, which directly and indirectly aided and abbeted life destroying Terrorism against said captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – who were savagely murdered by their Terrorist Captors, while said U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were denied by Bush and Miller the higher $25 million Dollar Rewards that saved the lives of terrorists who Bush and Miller protected with said $25 million Dollar Rewards while ruthlessly, relentlessly, and treasonably denying same life saving protection to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War. . 64. Miller was informed that such an Executive Branch Appeal would reveal the U.S. Executive Branch had been committing furtive and surruptitious life-destroying Treason against captured U.S. Page 17 of 31

215 of 256 216 of 256

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 18 of 31 soldier Prisoners of War in violation of Title 18 US Code once the Appeal was seen alongside the body count of $50,000 Death Sentence U.S. soldiers in the light of Public Opinion. . 65. Moreover, the tortured bodies of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in direct correlation of Miller’s Treasons in denying them right to higher and equal Rewards of $25 Million U.S. provided to Terrorists would also expose Miller’s U.S. Code Treasons against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War as Miller had operated his U.S. Code Treason violations when he administratively and judicially murdered Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty by means of his said denials in Case H-08-60. Whle “murder” appears to be a strong term, this stronng term murder is exactly what was inflicted on captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in direct correlation of Miller’s Treasons in denying U.S. soldier Prisoners of War right to higher and equal Rewards of $25 Million U.S. provided to Terrorists by Miller’s mentally unbalanced behavior of Miller insisting that a $450 Court fee was more important than the lives of said captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty – who were savagely murdered by their Terrorist Captors, while said U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were denied by Bush and Miller the higher $25 million Dollar Rewards that saved the lives of terrorists who Bush and Miller protected with said $25 million Dollar Rewards. . 66. Miller’s denial of Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 effectively identified Miller as an “Anti-American” judge issuing “Auschwitz-type” judicial decisions in support of “Auschwitz-type” U.S. Attorney Generals and “Treasonable U.S. Executive Branch Secretaries” that produced “Auschwitz-type” ‘Death-Sentences’ against “Terrorist Captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War.” . 67. It is not hyperbole to say “Cain slew Able”; and, Miller slew Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez, by means of denying Case H-08-60 Plaintiffs’ efforts to proceed. While it is obvious that Miller’s judicial denial of Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 did relate to the Terrorist murders of Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez, and was both indirect and direct, this condition does not make Miller’s slaying of Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez any less truthful. . 68. Miller’s Forma Pauperis denial interfered with Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 efforts to increase U.S. Reward amounts to $25 Million each for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War and on behalf of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in direct correlation of Miller’s Treasons in denying Maupin’s, Fouty’s, and Jimenez’s Fourteenth Amendment right to higher and equal Rewards of $25 Million U.S.

216 of 256 217 of 256

Reward dollars already bestowed to Terrorists by Attorney Generals Ashcroft, Gonzales, and Page 18 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 19 of 31 Mukaysey, said $25 Million U.S. Reward dollars having been criminally and treasonably denied to Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez by Attorney General Ashcroft, Attorney General Gonzales, Sectretaries Rice & Rumsfeld denying $25 Million U.S. Reward dollars, then later treasonably denied to Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez sucessively by Attorney General Mukaysey, Secretary Rice, and Gates. . 69. Miller’s wrongful expropriation of Case H-08-60 and refusal to recuse himself indicates “the thing speaks for itself (‘Res Ips Loquitor’),” a Pattern of behavior by Miller that incorporates the same manipulation of “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards” that Miller continued when he ignored the fact that he was a Bush Nominee / Appointee, and concealed from Plaintiffs the fact that he was a Bush Nominee, who most wrongfully ignored USC Title 28, Section 455, and wrongfully took jurisdiction which was outside Miller’s Ministerial and Discretionary scope according to the provisions of USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby Miller issuing Miller’s denial in Case H-08-60 that effectively blocked Plainfiffs; and, furthermore, following from Miller’s denial, the U.S. Court Clerk did not notify Plaintiffs in a timely manner by certified U.S. Mail regarding these most important “life-and-death” issues as Miller’s Denial applied to Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez. The Clerk’s notification by regular U.S. mail proved to be inadequate as Plaintiffs never received any word of Millers denial until Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie contacted the Clerk in June 2008 to determine if the Court charged for issuance of Summons. . 70. Miller’s entire pattern of conduct from his wrongful expropriation of Case H-08-60 to his predictable “Denial” of “Plaintiffs’ Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee (Forma Pauperis)” indicates that Miller had decided to subordinate the “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” considerations to the even lower amount of a $450 filing fee for Case H-08-60 before he wrongfully expropriated jurisdiction of Case H-08-60 to manipulate his wrongful denial of Plaintiffs efforts to proceed to a speedy trial and hearing. . 71. Before unlawfully usurping and expropriating jurisdiction of Case H-08-60, Miller apparently premeditated a criminal plan whereby after wrongfully expropriating jurisdiction, Miller ignored and furthermore trivialized Case H-08-60 by criminally subordinating the life and death reward issue considerations of the U.S. Executive Branch “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” offers to Miller’s even lower criminal amount of a $450 filing fee for Case H-08-60

217 of 256 218 of 256 requiring a $450 filing fee to be paid before Miller would consider the fact that captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez -- in Iraq would be murdered by their Terrorist Captors while Miller trivialized their lives at an even lower amount of a $450 Court Page 19 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 20 of 31 filing fee compared to “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards”. . 72. While there were several ways said $450 Court filing fee for Case H-08-60 could have been processed or handled, Miller manipulatively and unecessarily selected the single condition that created the most delay and liklihood of mutilation, torture, and “certain-murder” against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez – by Miller selectively denying “Plaintiffs’ Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee (Forma Pauperis)” for Case H- 08-60, which sought to change the Bush Executive Branch “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to become equal to higher life-saving Rewards of $25 Million that Bush’s Executive Branch was offering and paying to save lives of surrendered terrorists and “at large” terrorists from April 2004 through 09 July 2008 and to the present time, but was treasonably denying to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War unto torture, mutilation and murder prohibited by Geneva Convention III of 1949 and The Geneva Protocols of 1977. .73. Plaintiffs’ Case H-08-60 set forth higher life-saving Rewards of $25 Million each for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez – that Miller treasonably denied as equal $25 Million dollar rewards to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez -- while Miller was actively and deliberately in violation of USC Title 28, Section 455 and thereby acting outside of his Ministerial and Discretionary scope. . 74. When the overall pattern of Miller’s behavior is examined, from the time prior to his wrongful taking jurisdiction of Case H-08-60, in conflict as a Bush appointee surruptitiously not informing Plaintiffs, a Bush appointee denying captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez – the $25 Million Dollar Rewards sought by Plaintiffs in Case H-08-60, it is most apparent that Miller intended to insure that the White House Reward Treasons against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War would continue to motivate terrorist enemies of the United States to inflict mutilation, torture, and murder against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, whose Reward life values had obviously been slandered and defamed by “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death

218 of 256 219 of 256

Sentence’ Rewards” to the “lowest life value” in Iraq and Afghanistan, in fact slandered to 500 times less than the most wanted Terrorists, bin Ladin and Zawahiri, thereby portraying captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War as virtually valueless “trash” to their Muslim captors who well understood the Muslim tradition of “Blood Money.” . 75. The horiffic consequences of said treasonable Executive Branch “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” policy were that Terrorist captors consistently and predictably mutilated, tortured, and murdered captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in violation of Geneva Convention III of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977 as inspired by “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards”. . 76. What is most revealing about Miller’s wrongful behavior is that Case H-08-60 redunantly set forth the details of said treasonable Executive Branch “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” policy and plainly explained how said $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” policy had produced an ever increasing body count of predictably mutilated, tortured, and murdered captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in violation of Geneva Convention III of 1949 and Geneva Protocols of 1977. .77. Yet, Miller, with this information of Case H-08-60 in hand, surruptitiously took jurisdiction apparently with the most vile and criminal of intentions to deny Plaintiffs’ efforts to increase rewards on behalf of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War who were Victims of the White House Executive Branch “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Reward” policy. . 78. Miller’s wrongful expropriation of Case H-08-60 and refusal to recuse himself indicates that his deliberate denial of Plaintiffs’ “Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fee (Forma Pauperis)” was premeditatedly made with hostile and murderous indifference to the fate of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez. . 79. Miller wrongfully interfered with Case H-08-60 by denying it from being heard by a trail jury and Grand Jury. It is obvious that Miller intended to prevent higher Rewards for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War and intended to stand by to allow Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty to be tortured to death by Terrorist captors in Iraq . And, this is essentially what happened as a result of Miller denying Case H-08-60 going forward to trial, thereby treasonably denying equal $25 Million dollar rewards to captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez -- while Miller was actively and deliberately in violation of USC Title 28, Section 455 and thereby acting outside of his Ministerial and Discretionary scope. . 80. This sequence of events is so obvious in Miller’s behavior that “the thing speaks for itself (‘Res Ips Loquitor’)”: Miller’s behavior and denial of Case H-08-60 as being connected to the

219 of 256 220 of 256 deaths of Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty by denying Case H- 08-60 from going forward to trial based on Miller’s perverse demand that the $450 court filing fee be paid instead of waiving it in the interest of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez, thereby denied and prevented higher Rewards to save their lives as equally as the U.S. Executive Branch was saving Terrorist lives with the higher $25 Million dollar Rewards it advertised at its several “Rewards for Justice” Web Sites located at the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of State, at the same time Miller’s treasonable denial was in effect from 25 Feb 2008 to the present, August 2008. . 81. SEE: Rewards for Justice, Washington , D.C.20522-0303, 1-800-877-3927; [email protected]; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/ http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english . 82. Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez had U.S. Fourteenth Amendment rights to higher and equal Rewards of $25 Million U.S. Reward dollars to be treated with at least the same life-saving reward equality as Terrorist enemies of the United States and not to be treasonably slandered so far downward as to be publicly announced in the media as being assigned by their own government as at the lowest reward values, “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards,” in Iraq, unto 500 times less reward life value than the terrorist enemies of the United States. .83. At this particular juncture, it is most appropriate to question whether the U.S. Executive Branch in its advocacy of the lowest reward values, “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards,” in Iraq , unto 500 times less reward life value than the terrorist enemies of the United States was a violation of Title 18, Section 2381 – Treason, by deliberation or by error. . 84. SEE: USC Title 18, Section 2381 – Treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. . 85. Plaintiff concedes that it is possible for high ranking persons in U.S. government, deficiently educated in the law, even unbalanced U.S. Court Judges like Miller, to ignorantly perpetrate and commit acts that violate United States Codes, including ignorant violations of RICO (especially RICO) and ignorant violations of Treason, completely oblivious of the violations. . 86. However, ignorance, if true, does not mean that ignorant perpetration of a serious U.S.

220 of 256 221 of 256

Code violation linked to atrocities and War Crimes against captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Maupin, Fouty, and Jimenez -- should be ignored or forgiven. . 87. U.S. Judge Miller, after reading and learning the contents of Case H-08-60, obviously planned to expropriate wrongful jurisdiction with the purpose in mind of delaying consideration of U.S. Case H-08-60 in direct correlation of denying Maupin’s, Fouty’s, and Jimenez’s Fourteenth Amendment right to higher and equal Rewards of $25 Million U.S. Reward dollars to be Reward equal to Terrorists who were surviving surrender and capture in Iraq at a 100 % survival rate because they were blessed with Mega-Million dollar rewards while U.S. soldiers were cursed with “U.S. $50,000 ‘Death Sentence’ Rewards,” which obviously caused them to be tortured to death and murdered as targets of Bush’s White house Culture of Torture. . 88. The information of this issue indicates that captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty were murdered during the time period of 22 Feb 2008 to 08 July 2008, during said time period that U.S. Judge Miller, outside his ministerial and discretionary scope, did deny Plaintiffs’ efforts to provide $25 Million Dollar Rewards to save the lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War -- Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty -- on a Reward life value equal to said $25 Million U.S. Reward dollars bestowed by the U.S. Executive Branch on Terrorists. . 89. Miller’s denial was in “conflict of interest,” outside his ministerial and descretionary scope, in disqualification under “USC Title 28, Section 455, thereby acting in Miller’s Private Person Persona In decisions that impact the question of human-life during administration of any private or government institution, meanwhile understanding there are many ways to administratively save or destroy lives, directly and indirectly, or by manipulation of nonfeasance, misfeasance, or malfeasance. . 90. Thus, Miller’s denial of Case H-08-60 did have the same detrimental and life-destroying effect as applied by the U.S. Executive Branch against Sgt. Keith Maupin, Spc. Alex R. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron W. Fouty. Miller’s wrongful behavior in not recusing himself is very obvious on the face of the record in the matter of Case H-08-60, in that “the thing speaks for itself (‘Res Ips Loquitor’).” . 91. Complainant / Plaintiff requests this Court to appoint a 'Special Counsel' to present information of the herein alleged Felonies to a U.S. Grand Jury if the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney General, fails or refuses to present information of the listed

221 of 256 222 of 256

Crimes, herein, to a Grand Jury, and Complainant / Plaintiff requests these wrongdoings be publicly investigated by U.S. law enforcement agencies to include FBI, Homeland Security Agency, and BATF; and, said Crime reports be provided to these agencies and to the various U.S. Grand Juries and courts having jurisdiction of the Crimes reported by Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie of the Kristian Menchaca Family and, within this Court's Jurisdiction. . 92. The Kristian Menchaca Family petitions this Court issue a Protective Order to include the protection of the U.S. Victim/Witness program to Protect the Family of Kristian Menchaca . Complainant’s signature : S/ Kenneth MacKenzie, Printed name : Kenneth MacKenzie; title : Pro Se, Properia Persona, Complainant / Plaintiff member of Kristian Menchaca Family of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 - Houston, TX and U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Case # OTP-CR-100 /08

------Sworn to before me and signed in my presence. Date: Judge’s signature City and state: ------APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT “A”: U.S. District Court, War Crime Court Case H-08-60 (Houston) filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en): GENEVA CONVENTION 3 AND U.S. RICO ACT STATEMENTS describing DEFENDANT MISCONDUCT and BASIS OF LIABILITY ------EXHIBIT “B”: United States District Court, War Crime Court Case H-08-60 (Houston)

222 of 256 223 of 256

GENEVA CONVENTION 3 AND U.S. RICO ACT STATEMENTS describing DEFENDANT MISCONDUCT and BASIS OF LIABILITY ------EXHIBIT “C”: LETTER FROM OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] ; http://www.icccpi. int/home.html&l=en) acknowledging receipt of U.S. District Court, War Crime Court Case H-08-60 (Houston) and supplemental report material. ------EXHIBIT “D”: CLAIM FOR INJURY, DAMAGE, OR DEATH REGARDING POTENTIAL OF NUCLEAR CRIMES AGAINST U.S. CORPORATION "NUCLEAR CRIME" TARGETS IN MIDDLE EAST resulting in Radiological Cross Contamination of Holy St. Peters, submitted to: Ministers of Justice for Italy and Rome, UAE, Yemen, Uzbekistan, Indonesia, and so forth.

------Certificate of Service ------No.08-9595 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

(1) Kenneth MacKenzie, appearing Properia Persona as Plaintiff “Pro Se” appearing on his own behalf with family class members similarly situated, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, as Plaintiff, Aunt of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca (sister of Claimant Guadalupe Vasquez), (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, as Plaintiff, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, Mother of (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, as Plaintiff, Brother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, family class members similarly situated — PETITIONERS Class Action regarding: (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims Vs Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States — RESPONDENT(S)

223 of 256 224 of 256

PROOF OF SERVICE I, Kenneth MacKenzie, do swear or declare that on this date, 02 MAY 2009, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The names and addresses of those served are as follows: U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States; Erik Holder, Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE: Houston/Galveston Division: Mail: P.O. Box 61129 , Houston, TX 77208; TO: Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Office of the Solicitor General, Care Of Neal Katyal, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: 202-514-2217/18 hours 9:00 am to 5:30 pm, M-F 202-514-2203 [email protected] ; [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,[email protected] , . . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] ; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, [email protected] , ( http:// www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) TO: MAJ Oliver F. Mintz, Chief, Assistance and Investigations Branch, Office of the Inspector General, Texas Military Forces, Office: 512-782-5231; Mil Cell: 512-963-4318 ;[email protected]

224 of 256 225 of 256

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 02 MAY 2009, (Signature) S/ Kenneth MacKenzie Printed name: Kenneth MacKenzie

(Signature)

------Certificate of Service ------No.08-9595 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

(1) Kenneth MacKenzie, appearing Properia Persona as Plaintiff “Pro Se” appearing on his own behalf with family class members similarly situated, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, as Plaintiff, Aunt of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca (sister of Claimant Guadalupe Vasquez), (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, as Plaintiff, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, Mother of (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, as Plaintiff, Brother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, family class members similarly situated — PETITIONERS Class Action regarding: (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims VS Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States — RESPONDENT(S) Page 26 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 27 of 31 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Kenneth MacKenzie, do swear or declare that on this 02 MAY 2009, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF #2 on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed

225 of 256 226 of 256 to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The names and addresses of those served are as follows: U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States; Erik Holder, Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20530; TO: Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Office of the Solicitor General, Care Of Neal Katyal, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: 202-514-2217/18 hours 9:00 am to 5:30 pm, M-F 202-514-2203 [email protected] , . . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] ; [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,[email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, [email protected] , ( http:// www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) TO: MAJ Oliver F. Mintz, Chief, Assistance and Investigations Branch, Office of the Inspector General, Texas Military Forces, Office: 512-782-5231; Mil Cell: 512-963-4318 ; [email protected] I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 02 MAY 2009, (Signature) S/ Kenneth MacKenzie Printed name: Kenneth MacKenzie

226 of 256 227 of 256

------Certificate of Service ------Certificate of Service IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . . I hereby certify that the above and foregoing instrument was electronically served upon Defendants and Interested Parties and their counsel at their Web site electronic eMail addresses in the above entitled and numbered cause by Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Attorney Pro SE, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, H. Phone: 713- Page 27 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 28 of 31 225-0123 ; Cell : 281 684 6028; [email protected] , [email protected] , U.S. Court Case H-08-60; . . . KENNETH MACKENZIE, the undersigned, further certifies that he has served the U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General numerous times at their Web site Electronic Mail addresses, served them at U.S. White House Electronic Mail Addresses, at the Department of Defense Electronic Mail addresses:: [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], S/ Kenneth MacKenzie, Attorney Properia Persona (in his own person I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 02 MAY 2009, (Signature) S/ Kenneth MacKenzie Printed name: Kenneth MacKenzie

------Certificate of Service ------UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, 515 Rusk Ave., Houston, Texas 77002, Phone: 713.250.5500 {Judge: Gray Miller} {Civil Case (H)4:08-MC-60 filed 22Feb2008, Case Mgr. Stephanie Byrum} . . . .(1) Kenneth MacKenzie; (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, Aunt of Kristian (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, brother of Kristian as

227 of 256 228 of 256

Plaintiff, family class members similarly situated, Plaintiffs , appearing Properia Persona in CIVIL ACTION with demand of Jury Trial regarding War Crime torts of (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 and Protocols of 1977 for the protection of war victims, (2) USC Title 18, Section 1961, et.seq., RICO Act, against Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant ------Return of Service of Crime Complaint and Protective Order Motion to U.S. District Court Case H08-60 & War Crime Information to U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, Page 28 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 29 of 31 (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en ):. Complainant’s signature : S/ Kenneth MacKenzie,

Submitted by: : . . 1. Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, H. Phone: 713-225-0123 ; Cell : 281 684 6028 ; [email protected] , U.S. Court Case H-08- 60; . . 2. WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. War Crime Court Case H-08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icccpi. int/home.html&l=en):

------Certificate of Service ------UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Texas 515 Rusk Ave., Houston, Texas 77002, Phone: 713.250.5500 {Judge: Gray Miller} {Civil Case(H)4:08-MC-60 filed 22Feb2008, Case Mgr. Stephanie Byrum} .

228 of 256 229 of 256

. . .(1) Kenneth MacKenzie, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca,4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, PLAINTIFFS, of War Crimes, (1) Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV), et. seq., in CIVIL ACTION against Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant ------CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (X Via ECF) . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, ICC, Case OTP-CR-100/08, Hague , The Netherlands . . . . . To: President of The United States and Counsel to President of the United States Fax: 202- 456- Page 29 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 30 of 31 2883; Phn: 202 456-2632 . . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] Defense Attaché Office, US Embassy, 24 Grosvenor Square, London W1A 1AE ; Phone:[44] (0) 20 7894-0723; Fax:[44] (0) 20 7499-7688 ; Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] . . . . . TO: United States Attorney General Erik Holder, U.S. Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 2053 ;US Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC - (202) 353-1555 , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , . . . . . TO: United States Attorney Attorney General Mukasey, Care Of: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Tim Johnson, Houston, P.O. Box 61129, Houston, TX 77208; 8-5 M-F: (713)

229 of 256 230 of 256

718-3310; U.S. Atty. (713) 567-9000 FBI 713-693-5000 ; [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ; [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ,[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] . . . TO: Captain Weiskopf & Commander, ATTN: IACS-SMIO-PAO, 8825 Beulah Street , Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5246, INSCOM Phone: (703) 428-4965 ; INSCOM Pentagon 703-697-4200 ; Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] . . . TO: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, U.S. Special Counsel; jeffrey.kerr ; heather.cartwright ; cathy.spears; Office of U.S. Special Counsel, and To U.S. National Security Division, U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DoJ), Office of Justice for Victims of Overseas Terrorism; and an Executive Office. or 202-514-1057; jeffrey.kerr: 202-616-3581 ; heather.cartwright: 202-514-1057; ; cathy.spears: 202 307 -6649 ; eMail : [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; . . . TO: George Hephner, Deputy U.S. Marshall, 515 Rusk, Houston, TX 77002, 713 718 4800; [email protected] ______. . I hereby certify that the above and foregoing instrument was served upon Defendants and Interested Parties and their counsel in the above entitled and numbered cause at Page 30 of 31

08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca # 3 Crime Complaint: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CT Page 31 of 31 their office eMail addresses as indicated at their "published" Internet Web sites by Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Attorney Pro SE, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez

230 of 256 231 of 256

Menchaca, H. Phone: 713-225-0123 ; Cell : 281 684 6028; [email protected] , [email protected] , U.S. Court Case H-08-60; KENNETH MACKENZIE, the undersigned, further certifies that he has served the U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General numerous times at their Web site Electronic Mail addresses, served them at U.S. White House Electronic Mail Addresses, at the Department of Defense Electronic Mail addresses: [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], Complainant’s signature : S/ Kenneth MacKenzie, Printed name : Kenneth MacKenzie; title : Pro Se, Properia Persona, Complainant / Plaintiff member of Kristian Menchaca Family of U.S. Court Case H-08-60 - Houston, TX;

DATE: 10 MAR 2009 Page 31 of 31 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

231 of 256 232 of 256

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CHAPTER 13 . PETITION FOR REHEARING OF A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO U.S. COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Washington, DC 20543-0001, [email protected]

Kenneth MacKenzie, Guadalupe Vasquez, . }

Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, (Petitioners) . . } v...... } No. 08-9595

United States (Respondent), ...... } U.S. Supreme Court Rule 44:

U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL ELANA. . . . . } PETITION FOR REHEARING

KAGAN, Counsel for Respondent, ...... }

(Respondents) ...... }

Rule 44: PETITION FOR REHEARING OF A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO U.S.

COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

. . . This Petition is also submitted under the principle of "Complementarity" to United Nations

International Criminal Court, The Hague, Netherlands, submitted to Middle East Ministers of

232 of 256 233 of 256

Justice and Courts as cited in following paragraphs, and submitted to the Imams of the Great

Mosques throughout the Middle East regarding U.S. manipulation of "Nuclear Radiological

Contamination Crimes" against the Holy Kaaba during the Administration of President G.W.

Bush and currently continuing under the Administration of President Barak Obama ignoring said "Nuclear Crimes" against the Holy Kaaba.

. . . The truth is that this U.S. Supreme Court did not interpret or even apply U.S. Constitutional law in its May 1st, 2009 decision to deny equal Protection of U.S. Reward laws on behalf of U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, who this court is "well aware " would suffer torture-death as a consequence of this court's abrogation of its responsibility to interpret the U.S. Constitution

Fourteenth Amendment.

. . . The U.S. Supreme Court Clerk notified Plaintiffs that this court had scheduled 04 May 2009 as the date by which Briefs in Opposition could be filed with this court, but the Clerk never notified Petitioners that this Court had shortened the time period to 01 May 2009 .

. . . In compliance with the Clerk's previous 04 May notification, Plaintiffs did electronically file the following at Supplemental Brief s on the merits at U.S. Supreme Court's Washington, DC

20543-001, electronic address [email protected] :

Supplemental Brief "08-9595 tssb MacKenzie,Vasquez, Menchaca, 11 PM, May 1st, 2009

"08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca #2, filed on May 2nd, 2009

"08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca #3, filed on May 2nd, 2009

"08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca #5, filed on May 2nd 2009

"08-9595 tssb MacKenzie, Vasquez, Menchaca #6, filed on May 3rd, 2009.

Plaintiffs also filed paper hard copies of these Briefs, which the Clerk stamped as received on

May 4, 2009 when he returned one of them to Petitioner MacKenzie.

. . . However, this U.S. Supreme Court made its denial of Plaintiff's Certiorari Petition on May

233 of 256 234 of 256

01, 2009, without reading one word of said foregoing 'U.S. Supreme Ct. Rule 15 Supplemental

Briefs' as said Supplemental Briefs had been electronically posted with the court from 11 PM,

May 1st, 2009 to May 3rd, 2009, and posted in hard paper copy on May 04, 2009, the date this

U.S. Supreme Court had set for briefs to be posted. Hence, this court ruled prematurely on May

01, 2009 without forewarning Plaintiffs; and, said Briefs containing information crucial to

Plaintiffs Certiorari Petition was never read or understood by this U.S. Supreme Court related to

"Clerk behavior." And, this U.S. Supreme Court changed due date for Briefs from May 04, 2009 to the earlier time of May 01, 2009 without Plaintiffs' knowledge, again related to "Clerk behavior" in not notifying Plaintiffs the Court's deadline for receiving briefs had been inexplicably shortened. The Clerk should have notified plaintiffs of the date change.

. . . Said Briefs were intended to inform this Court that Plaintiffs were litigating this matter in

The United States Supreme Court under U.S. Attorney manipulated threat of death by means of

U.S. Attorney denying U.S. Victim/Witness Protection to the Terrorist victimized and threatened

Menchaca family, and that Plaintiffs had been denied Victim / Witness protection by U.S Attorney

Tim Johnson, Houston, who continued to maintain said death threat by operation of the U.S.

Attorney denial of Victim / Witness Protection for the Plaintiff family of PFC Kristian Menchaca, a family clearly victimized but receiving less Victim Protection than was accorded to Mafioso

Trigger Man, "Sammy 'The Bull' Gravano."

. . .If the Holy Kaaba is Radiologically poisoned as a consequence of U.S. Private Corporation

(Halliburton Corporation presence in Saudi Arabia & so forth on Defendant list) & U.S. Military presence in the Middle East, then those associated with the U.S. efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan become 'marked' by all Muslims as responsible for the 'Nuclear Crime poisoning' of the Holy

Kaaba, thereby, also "marked" as 'responsible' for 1600 years contamination will remain.

. . . Of Question 1: Will the Muslim members of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's own Bodyguard

234 of 256 235 of 256

('Praetorian Guard') and Military "who kneel and pray five times per day facing the Holy Kaaba," blame Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's behavior as essentially "worse behavior" than former

Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's and blame al-Maliki in relation to the "Nuclear Crimes" that may already have been inflicted against the Holy Kaaba or blame al-Maliki in relation to the

"Nuclear Crimes" that "will" almost certainly be inflicted against the Holy Kaaba as explained in

Petitioners' U.S. Supreme Court litigation?

. . . Of Question 2: Will the members of President Hamid Karzai's Bodyguard ('Praetorian Guard') and Military, "who kneel and pray five times per day facing the Holy Kaaba," blame President

Hamid Karzai's behavior as essentially "worse behavior" than former Egyptian President Anwar

Sadat's in relation to the "Nuclear Crimes" that may already have been inflicted against the Holy

Kaaba or blame Karzai's behavior in relation to the "Nuclear Crimes" that almost certainly "will" be inflicted against the Holy Kaaba as explained in Petitioners' U.S. Supreme Court litigation?

. . . Of Question 3: Of course, considering that the U.S. Department of Justice continues to perpetrate its crimes against the Menchaca family via U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson's attempted surrogate murders patterned on the same denials of 14th Amendment protections as Ashcroft-

Gonzales-Mukasey-Miller inflicted on captured U.S. Soldier Prisoners of War and, of course, considering the 'ripple effect' of U.S. Attorney Johnson's daily perpetrations to motivate Johnson's

'surrogate' terrorist murder efforts against the Menchaca family, then it is most appropriate to file these complaints to the Imams and Mullahs in the Mosques throughout the Middle East.

. . . Of Question 4: U.S. Supreme Court to issue one "Protective Order" to the White House to provide additional security for the life of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki of Iraq and to issue another "Protective Order" to the White House to provide additional security for the life of

President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan.

235 of 256 236 of 256

. . . Of Question 5: Considering the "Ripple Effect" of "Nuclear Crimes" that lethally contaminate the Holy Kaaba in much worse condition than this U.S. Supreme Court was Anthrax contaminated about the time of 9/11, then is is also appropriate to request that the U.S. provide additional protection to its other allies, such as the Queen of England, the Prime Minister of

Pakistan, PM of France, PM Chancellor of Germany, and others who are at risk of increased attack from offended Muslims .

. . . Petitioners' Supplemental Briefs of 01 May 2009 through 04 May 2009 to this court were intended to inform this Court that Plaintiffs were additionally litigating this matter as submitted for Reward decisions on lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War (POW) to the Minister of

Justice for Italy and Rome, to the Minister of Justice for Indonesia, to the Minister of Justice for

Yemen, and to the Minister of Justice for Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, of Plaintiffs'

Radiological Crime Tort {1} Claims filed in Vatican, Italy and Rome; {2} Claims filed in Republic of Yemen; {3} Claims filed in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; {4} Claims filed in Jakarta,

Indonesia, said Claims explaining that according to President Bush, U.S. soldiers in Iraq and

Afghanistan were fighting to recover Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq and

Afghanistan targeted at U.S., targeted at U.K., and targeted at several other countries.

. . Plaintiffs alleged in said Supplemental Briefs that in accordance with Bush's said WMD

Claims regarding the cities of Middle East Nations, it is most reasonable to consider that U.S.

Soldiers were protecting the city of Mecca, location of the Holy Kaaba and protecting the city of

Mehdina, location of the"Mosque of the Prophet," the second holiest site in Islam, the site of the actual burial tomb of Mohamed, himself . U.S. Soldiers were protecting these cities and others from "Nuclear Crime" consequences that could lead to "Nuclear Crime" contamination of said

"Nuclear Crime" target U.S. corporations that could also lead to "Cross-contaminate" the Holy

Kaaba with life-destroying Radiological Poisons and lead to the same Radiological contamination

236 of 256 237 of 256 in Italy and Rome, thereby also lethally contaminating St, Peter's with Radiological poisons.

. . . Plaintiffs have alleged this in their Claims to the Ministers of Justice for the mentioned countries that U.S. Corporations doing business in their countries are "Nuclear Crime" targets protected by the efforts of U.S. Soldiers fighting to protect them from Nuclear Crimes originating in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that "Nuclear Crime" contamination of said U.S. corporations in

Italy and Rome could also unintentionally "Cross-contaminate" the Holy St. Peters with life destroying Radiological Poisons.

. . . Kenneth MacKenzie's several non-fiction books are advertised at the web sites, http://christianmenchaca.com/publisher.php and "christianmenchaca.com ," under the titles

DEFENDING HOLY ST. PETERS - The Nuclear Crime Contaminations -- the "Hot" Roentgen

Counts, Copyright © 2009 and Defending Holy Kaaba - The Nuclear Crime Contaminations -- the

"Hot" Roentgen Counts, Copyright © 2009

. . . Therefore, the same questions to this Court are also currently submitted under Koranic law in

Saudi Arabia and Middle East countries alleging that said "private property U.S. corporations," in the Middle East and in Italy and Rome and in other Western countries, owe a debt of responsibility to post and pay mega million dollar "Ransoms and Rewards" for the Reward life value of "captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War" equal to the Reward life value posted by the U.S. government for Terrorist Insurgents who have been advertised since 2006 as worth Mega Million dollar rewards at U.S. Department of JUSTICE and at U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Internet

"REWARDS FOR JUSTICE PROGRAMS." http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/ ; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english ;

. . . This U.S. Supreme Court issued what appears to be an incompletely considered political

"denial" on this U.S. Constitutional "Reward Equality" matter, 01 May 2009 , marked by its support of said U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Rewards" against U.S. soldier Prisoners of War

237 of 256 238 of 256 proven to have been "administratively murdered" by means of said U.S. "$50,000 Death

Sentence Rewards" that criminally 'motivated' Terrorist surrogates' to 'torture-murder' all captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq in violation of Geneva Convention III prohibitions of "Death Sentences" and "Death Defamations" of the life value of "U.S. soldier Prisoners of War."

. . . The fact is that said U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Rewards" have been proven to become

"$50,000 Death Sentence Rewards" in that "all one hundred percent of captured U.S. soldier

Prisoners of War " in Iraq were tortured to death and murdered as a consequence of Ashcroft-

Gonzales-Mukasey deliberately 'designed' and inflicted "$50,000 Death Rewards."

. . . Yet, during the same time period, all one hundred percent of captured Terrorist Insurgent

Prisoners of War in Iraq were life-saved by said mega-million dollar rewards offered by U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE Internet "REWARDS FOR JUSTICE PROGRAMs," http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=wanted_captured&language=english ; http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/

. . .In its erroneous and premature May 1st, 2009 denial of U.S. Fourteenth Amendment equal

Protection of U.S. Reward laws on behalf of U.S. soldier Prisoners of War during the current

"Wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan, this U.S. Supreme Court ignored the fact that the United States has continuously offered said $50,000 Rewards for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War

("POW") that have motivated and caused Terrorist captors to torture to death and murder all 100 percent of U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, thus illustrating said U.S. $50,000 Rewards, in truth, are "SENTENCES OF DEATH" ; and, this Supreme Court also ignored the fact that the United

States offered "Mega-Million Dollar Rewards of $5 Million to $25 Million dollars during the same time period from 2004 to the present for captured Terrorist Insurgent Prisoners of War ("POW") that have saved the lives of all 100 percent of captured Terrorist Insurgent Prisoners of War .

. . .This court had many alternative options available to apply its jurisdiction to "EQUALIZE"

238 of 256 239 of 256 said U.S. offered $50,000 Rewards for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War under provision of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment.

. . . Instead, this U.S. Supreme Court 'denied' Petitioners and future captured U.S. Prisoners of

War their U.S. Constitutional right to be "Reward Equal" in this Certiorari Petition and thereby selected the the current and most harmful "U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Reward" to continue to destroy captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War by means of torture death wherein this U.S.

Supreme Court is valuing captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War at lesser life value than enemy terrorists fighting against the United States.

. . . No "VOLUNTEER" Soldier in the U.S. Military, knowing he has been deliberately life- devalued by the U.S. Bush government and ignored by the U.S. government of President Barak

Obama and U.S. Attorney General Erik Holder unto "U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Rewards," will want to fight against any enemy that U.S. government of the Bush Administration have assigned at higher Reward life-values of "Mega-Million Dollar Rewards from $5 Million to

$25 Million dollars. The infamous Reward treasons against U.S. soldier Prisoners of War have extended from the Bush U.S. Executive Branch to the U.S. Supreme Court judiciary.

. . . Few U.S. Soldiers will want to fight under such treasonable reward conditions once they are informed that U.S. government War Criminals and this U.S. Supreme Court view them as worth having less life value than terrorist enemies of the United States.

. .Currently, all "VOLUNTEER" U.S. Soldiers in the U.S. Military are not informed at their

"voluntary enlistment" of said "U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Reward" treachery as it is being operated against their lives by the U.S. government.

. . . It is obvious that said "U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Rewards" could be math 'balanced' unto an "equal condition" by lowering the Reward life value of terrorist insurgents and increasing

Reward life values for U.S. soldier Prisoners of War.

239 of 256 240 of 256

. . . It is obvious that said "U.S. "$50,000 Death Sentence Rewards" could be math 'balanced' unto an "equal condition" by increasing the Reward life value of U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to equal the $25 Million Dollar Reward life values currently offered on behalf of terrorist insurgents and discriminatingly denied unto death against U.S. soldier Prisoners of War, thereby sentencing lower life "$50,000 Death Sentence Reward' U.S. soldier Prisoners of War to torture death at capture and saving the lives of terrorist insurgents with higher life values .

. . .The U.S. soldiers who were administratively murdered by U.S. Attorneys General Ashcroft-

Gonzales-Mukasey and U.S. District Judge Gray Miller as audience in the United States watching U.S. soldier Prisoners of War in Iraq tortured to death under said U.S.-offered $50,000

Death Sentence Rewards, were not criminals convicted of crimes under any U.S. state crime code or U.S. federal crime code.

. . .Said U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were U.S. soldiers who entered U.S. military service through "voluntary enlistment." And, they can easily un-volunteer over a Reward issues such as said U.S.-offered $50,000 Death Sentence Rewards for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War --

Bush's "Adolph-Hitler-Rewards" for captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War.

. . . In its 01 May 2009 denial against captured U.S. soldier POW, this U.S. Supreme Court issued an unethical 'political denial' against the life values of U.S. soldier Prisoners of War that will go down in U.S. history as more characteristic of a blood-soaked Hitlerian Beast than of an ethical

U.S. Court of Constitutional Law. Several of this Court's Justice positions are Bush nominees.

. . . In said Supplemental Briefs "08-9595 tssb MacKenzie,Vasquez, Menchaca, Plaintiffs did motion that this U.S. Supreme Court issue "Orders to Show Cause" to the U.S Executive Branch why U.S Executive Branch should offer "to assist" or "not assist" in defense regarding the potential of Radiological Crimes against the Holy Kaaba in Saudi Arabia and Holy St. Peters in

Vatican City-State as said "Nuclear Crimes" most certainly will occur within the context of U.S.

240 of 256 241 of 256 presence, 'Private Corporation commercial business presence', in Middle East and Italy .

. . . Should Holy St. Peters become "Nuclear Crime" cross-contaminated as the consequence of a

Radiological attack against the presence of U.S. Corporations doing business in Italy and Rome, then it is certain that 18 percent of the earth's population, 1.3 Billion Catholics, will be extremely concerned about the responsibility of the United States in contributing to "Nuclear Crime" cross- contamination of Holy St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican City-State in Rome.

. . . Should the Holy Kaaba similarly become "Nuclear Crime" cross-contaminated then it is certain that 20 percent of the earth's population, 1.5 Billion Muslims, will also be extremely concerned about the responsibility of the United States in contributing to "Nuclear Crimes."

. . .Plaintiff has filed International War Crime Complaints to this United States Supreme Court under Docket number 08-9595 and has filed the same complaint with U.S. District Court,

Southern District of Texas, alleging a War Crime Complaint against U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson captioned in accordance with forms provided by U.S. District Courts.

. . . These Complaints have been concurrently filed with U.N. International Criminal Court, ICC,

Prosecutor, case # otp-cr-100/08, the Hague, the Netherlands."

. . . Plaintiff MacKenzie says that either this court or U.S. District Court should issue "ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE" (OTC) to U.S. Attorney General to "show cause" WHY KENNETH

MACKENZIE, OR "Non-government (NGO) entity," should or should not post 'lawful' reward offers of twenty five million dollars ($25,000,000 U.S.) for arrest & prosecution of United States

Attorney Johnson and former U.S. Attorney General Gonzales whose criminal behavior has created a 'crime-ripple-effect' on expansion of war in "Iraq and Afghanistan" and increases

"threat" of nuclear radiological damage to people of United States, Europe, Middle East, and, furthermore, increases "threat" of nuclear radiological damage to THE HOLY KAABA in Mecca and , increases "threat" of nuclear radiological damage to the Holy Mosque Tomb of the prophet

241 of 256 242 of 256

Mohammed, himself, in Medina, Saudi Arabia, thereby slandering, defaming, and insulting ALL

OF ISLAM with silent threat of 'NUCLEAR CRIMES' against "Radiological Crime Insulted"

Holy KAABA in Meccah, and against the Holy Mosque Tomb of the prophet Mohammed, himself.

. . .Again, Petitioner MacKenzie requests this Supreme Court to issue "Life-Protective-Orders" to the U.S. Executive Branch to protect the lives of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki of Iraq and

President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan and requests this court further issue "Life-Protective-

Orders" to the U.S. Executive Branch to protect the lives of captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of

War with Rewards equal to those $25 Million the U.S. Executive offers for Terrorists.

. . . PLAINTIFF Kenneth MacKenzie's said 'LAWFUL' REWARD OFFERS in this court litigation are responses to "U.S. Attorney Employee Tim Johnson's (BUSH APPOINTEE) 'direct and indirect' (See: 'RICO Act' language) attempts to 'Administratively Mass Murder,' by means of motivating Criminals to murder the entire Christian Menchaca family," and are part of

MacKenzie's series of efforts to expose Johnson's administratively manipulated murder attempts by MacKenzie litigating against "U.S. Attorney Employee Johnson's" corrupt and criminal rationales in U.S. courts, and litigating against Johnson's criminal corruption in 'ALL' courts of the Middle East to expose Johnson's murderous criminal corruption as to how Johnson's murderous criminal corruption relates to the U.S. presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, which U.S. presence in Iraq and Afghanistan causes increased threat of Radiological contamination against the Holy KAABA, that may already have been previously "Nuclear Crime" stealth contaminated by Russian government or other government Interests or Non-Government Organizations (NGO) intent on causing a world-wide reaction by the 1.5 billion Islamic population of the earth against the United States.

. . . SEE: Plaintiff MacKenzie's previous documents submitted to above courts and submitted to:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with request she forward crime complaints to President

242 of 256 243 of 256

BARAK OBAMMA as written by Plaintiff MacKenzie against U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson's

(Bush appointee) denials regarding VICTIM PROTECTION of Terrorist victimized and threatened family of PFC Christian Menchaca, a U.S. Army soldier tortured to death in Iraq,

2006, by Terrorist Insurgents protected by high denomination United States government offered

Mega million dollar rewards, which were concurrently denied to PFC Menchaca and PFC Tucker; and, said United States government offered Mega million dollar rewards do continue to be criminally and wrongfully denied to U.S. Military currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, while said continuing Mega million dollar rewards offered by U.S. Department of Justice and

Department of State Internet sites continue to save and protect the lives of 'captured' and 'at large' Terrorist Insurgents during combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.

. . . MacKenzie's said estimated 'LAWFUL' REWARD OFFERS in court litigation are responses to

"U.S. Attorney Employee Tim Johnson's (BUSH APPOINTEE) 'direct and indirect' (See: 'RICO

Act' language) attempts to "Administratively Mass Murder' the entire family of PFC Christian

Menchaca" in denying them Victim/Witness Protection from Criminal reprisals engineered by

U.S. Atty. Johnson's manipulated efforts / attempts of Mass Murder & Title 18 U.S. Code Crime offenses of 'Tampering' and 'Retaliation' against the family of PFC Kristian Menchaca tortured to death with PFC Tucker, Iraq, 2006

LITIGATING RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION FOR HOLY KAABA, MECCAH , &

RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION FOR ST. PETER'S, VATICAN : MacKenzie's series of efforts are intended to expose U.S. Attorney Johnson's murder attempts against the family of victimized

PFC Christian Menchaca by litigating against "U.S. Attorney Employee Johnson's corrupt and criminal rationales in U.S. courts, and further litigating against Johnson's criminal corruption in

'ALL' courts of the Middle East and further submitting / litigating said War Crime complaints in

243 of 256 244 of 256 the courts of Europe and the Office of the Prosecutor in United Nations INTERNATIONAL

CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC), Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The

Hague, The Netherlands, http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en

. . . US Atty. Johnson's (Bush appointee in Houston) "Victim Protection denial" was most obviously perpetrated to criminally "Tamper and Retaliate" for the purpose of instilling fear against the terrorist victimized families of U.S. soldiers and does illustrate that unprotected victimized families of U.S. soldiers are even more vulnerable to a Criminal attack.

. . . Also, US Atty. Johnson's "Victim Protection denial" was most obviously perpetrated to manipulate Criminals as surrogate criminals to attack the unprotected PFC Christian Menchaca family as a U.S. Justice Department response against the Christian Menchaca family's U.S.

Claim & U.S. Court Case H-08-60 and U.S. Supreme Court # 08-9595; and, said US Atty.

Johnson's "Victim Protection denial" is also obviously a replica of the same type of (1) U.S.

Executive Branch and " U.S.- administration-manipulated-murder-by-surrogate wherein (1) denial-of-fourteenth-Amendment protection was perpetrated by U.S. Executive Branch Attorney

Generals Ashcroft-Gonzales and Mukasey against captured U.S. Prisoners of War and also (2) perpetrated by U.S. Judge Gray Miller, appointee of President GW Bush, against captured U.S.

Prisoners of War to manipulate terrorists as surrogate murderers who murdered U.S. soldier

Prisoners of War due to manipulated U.S. Reward insufficiencies deliberately done to illustrate that the Bush Administration was intent on sacrificing the lives of captured U.S. Prisoners of

War to prove the Bush motto that "the U.S. does not deal with terrorists."

. . . Thus, U.S. Executive Branch Attorney Generals Gonzales and Mukasey and Judge Gray

Miller were all able to manipulate torture deaths against captured U.S. Prisoners of War by all of them using the technique of denying the same 14th Amendment equal protection clause of the

U.S. Constitution in a manner that assured U.S. Executive Branch Attorney Generals Gonzales's

244 of 256 245 of 256 and Mukasey's and Judge Gray Miller's, denials of equal reward protections would absolutely and without question motivate Terrorist Insurgents to torture to death U.S. Army PFC Kristian

Menchaca, PFC Thomas Tucker, PFC Joseph Anziak, Sgt. Keith Maupin, PFC Byron Fouty, Spec.

Alex Jimenez.

. . . It is astounding to note that U.S. Attorneys General Ashcroft-Gonzales-Mukasey did cause the deaths of all 100% of captured U.S. Prisoners of War "AND" astounding to note that "Private

Person" Gray Miller, in his usurpation of U.S. Case H-08-60, acting outside his ministerial and discretionary scope, in the guise of a U.S. District judge, usurping said U.S. District Court jurisdiction away from the many judges who were not Bush appointees disqualified by conflict of interest in violation of 28 USC § 455, also did manipulate torture deaths against captured U.S.

Prisoners of War, Sgt. Keith Maupin, PFC Byron Fouty, Spec. Alex Jimenez during litigation of

U.S. Case H-08-60 from February 2008 to July 2008 while the U.S. Army had them listed as alive and missing in action.

. . . 3aq`Currently, US Attorney Johnson is applying the same 14th Amendment denial of "equal protection under the fourteenth Amendment" against the Menchaca family as was applied by

Attorney Generals Gonzales and Mukasey and Judge Gray Miller against said captured U.S.

Prisoners of War, U.S. Army PFC Kristian Menchaca, PFC Thomas Tucker, PFC Joseph Anziak,

Sgt. Keith Maupin, PFC Byron Fouty, Spec. Alex Jimenez..

The truth is that all captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War were tortured to death as the consequence of heavily and intensely and repetitively manipulated denials of their 'Fourteenth

Amendment Constitutional right to equal life rewards,' denied to be equal to the same life rewards U.S. offered for Terrorist Insurgent Prisoners of War and U.S. offered for "at large"

Terrorist Insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

. . . Plaintiff seeks to present crime complaint information to a U.S. grand jury which has been

245 of 256 246 of 256 ignored, concealed, and obstructed from the view of a Grand Jury by U.S. Attorney General, By

U.S. Attorney Tim Johnson, by Judge Gray Miller of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, U.S.

Case No. H-08-60 and FBI Director Robert Mueller, and former Attorney General Mukasey.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect the lives of the

Menchaca family until such time as said Criminal threats are no longer an issue.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect Holy Kaaba, Mecca, Saudi

Arabia, from "Nuclear Crime" attack related to U.S. War prosecution in Iraq and Afghanistan.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect the Tomb of

Mohamed in Medina, Saudi Arabia from said "Nuclear Crime" attack related to the U.S. War prosecution in Iraq and Afghanistan.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue a Protective Order to protect Holy St. Peter's from "Nuclear Crime" attacks related to U.S. War prosecution in Iraq & Afghanistan.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant an Order to Show Cause why the

U.S. should or should not offer "Radiological Crime" Protection to said Holy shrines in Saudi

Arabia, Vatican, Italy and Rome.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant an Order to Show Cause why the

U.S. should or should not offer "Radiological Crime" Protection to the U.S. Business

Entities in Mecca & Medina, Saudi Arabia and in Italy in an effort to protect Holy Kaaba, protect the Mosque of the Prophet, protect Holy St. Peter's and protect all pilgrims visiting these Holy

Shrines from Radiological Cross-Contamination as is expected to come from Radiological attack against U.S. Business property in Mecca & Medina, Saudi Arabia and Rome, Vatican, and Italy.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant and to fifty US state governors to

"show cause" why they should not forewarn U.S. federal troops and State National Guard troops of said insufficient "$50,000 'Death' Rewards" that directly impact National Guard troops

246 of 256 247 of 256 when 'federalized' into the federal military of the United States. And, further warning said

Volunteers for military service that they could be tortured to death as were all captured U.S. soldier Prisoners of War by presenting said Volunteers with said videos and photos of Kristian

Menchaca's and Thomas Tucker's torture deaths.

. . . Plaintiffs request this Court to issue to Defendant and to fifty U.S. state governors and U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Secretary of State and "Order to 'Show Cause' " why

U.S. Bush administration "fifty thousand dollar torture-death 'rewards'" offered by U.S. for captured U.S. soldier prisoners of war should continue to remain in effect after Bush administration has vacated office of presidency of the United States.

Complainant’s signature : S/ Kenneth MacKenzie, Printed name : Kenneth MacKenzie; title : Petitioner, [email protected]

: : : : : : : : : :

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

. . . . . WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc- cpi.int/home.html&l=en) : (1) U.S. business targets in Saudi Arabia, Monaco, Vatican, & France, Europe, potential victims of Nuclear Contamination Crimes : 'Nuclear-Crime' Contamination of Holy Kaaba & 3.5 million HAJJ PILGRIMS in Meccah, 2008:

FROM: Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, ; [email protected] ; U.S. Court Case H-08-60; eBook titles : http:// www.kristianmenchaca.com ; Screen Play: Princess And The Sons Of Paradise, © 1997, 2004, 2005: http://www.writesafe.com/storage8/CANCOPY_cvrAfAmp_MATT.pdf ; http://www.writesafe.com/storage9/P RINCESS_22Jan05.pdf

خادم :To: King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, (Arabic :([born August 1, 1924[4 ,الحرمين الشريفين الملك عبد ا بن عبد العزيز آل دسعود ,("The Sacred Mosque" المسجد الحرام ) Ḫādim al-Ḥaramain al-Sharīfain, Al-Masjid al-Harām خادم الحرمين الشريفين :Arabic (" [al-Kaʿbah; [ˈkɑʕbɑ الكعبة :Kaaba (Arabic

247 of 256 248 of 256

. . . TO: Minister of Justice for Saudi Arabia, Dr Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Ibrahim Al Al-Sheikh, Ministry of Justice, University Street, Riyadh 11137 Tel: 405 7777 / 405 5399, Information/Press Office: (202) 337-4076 ; e-mail: [email protected] . . . TO: HRH Prince Mohamed Al Faisal Al Saud, Care of: WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP, 399 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022, Tel: (212) 230-8800, Fax: (221) 230-8888; Counsel for HRH Prince Mohamed Al Faisal Al Saud; David Bowker, Esquire, [email protected] ; Douglas Curtis, Esquire, [email protected] . . . . To: HRH Prince Turki Al-Faisal Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud; Care of: KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & EVANS, P.L.L.C., 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Sumner Square, Washington, DC 20036-3209 Tel: (202) 326-7900 ; Fax: (202) 326-7999, Counsel for HRH Prince Turki Al-Faisal Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, and The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Mark C. Hansen, Esquire, Kelly P. Dunbar, Esq.: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] . . . . President Islam Karimov, Care of Embassy of Uzbekistan, Phone:(202) 887-5300, Fax:(202) 293- 6804, 1746 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.20036-1903, Email: [email protected] . . . TO : Dr Steven Chu, care of Ray Madden: [email protected] , U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW | Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 1-800-dial-DOE , 1-800-342-5363 . f/202-586-4403 . . . TO: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, U.S. Special Counsel, Office of U.S. Special Counsel, and To U.S. National Security Division, U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DoJ), Office of Justice for Victims of Overseas Terrorism; and an Executive Office. [email protected] or 202-514-1057; . . . TO: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, U.S. Special Counsel, Office of U.S. Special Counsel, Washington Office, Bond Federal Building, 1400 New York Avenue, NW, Ninth Floor, Washington D. C. 20530 . . . TO: Gregory H. Friedman, Insp.Gnl, U.S. Dept. Energy, Phone : (202) 586-4393 ; Mail: 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.; Washington, D.C. 20585; Hotline: (800) 541-1625; (202) 586-4073, Hotline Website: [email protected] , . . . TO: Minister of Justice for Pakistan. Care of: Ambassador Husain Haqqani, Embassy of Pakistan , 3517 International Court N.W, Washington D.C. 20008 , Phone: 202-243-6500 Fax: 202- 686-1534 ; [email protected]

248 of 256 249 of 256

. . . TO: Minister of Justice for Yemen. Care of Ambassador Al-Hajjri, Embassy of Yemen E-mail: [email protected] ; Contact Person:Nadia Hashem, Assistant to the Ambassador, E- mail: [email protected] , Phone Number: (202)337-8113 . . . . To: Minister of Justice for Kingdom of Bahrain. Care of: H.E. Ambassador Houda Ezra Nonoo, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Kingdom of Bahrain to the United States of America Since July 2008, E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] . . . . To: Minister of Justice for Oman, Care of: Cultural Office's main number: (571) 722-0000 or Fax (571) 722-0001. Email: [email protected] , [email protected] Royal Consulate General of Saudi Arabia One Westheimer Plaza, 5718 Westheimer St., Ste. 1500, Houston, TX 77057; Tel: (713)785-5577; Fax: (713)785-1163 National eGovernment Services Portal Department, eGovernment Services Program (Yesser) King Abdul Aziz Communication Complex, Al-Morsalat Quarter Riyadh 11112, Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia Tel: +966 1 4522 342 / +966 1 4522 309 ; Fax: +966 1 4522 353; Email: [email protected] Commission For Investigation And Prosecution - Riyadh, Postal Code 11575, City Riyadh Region, P.O.Box 61832, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Phone +96614629883 Fax +96614628956 ; E-mail [email protected] ; [email protected] Web Site http://www.cip.gov.sa Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers; [email protected] ; Tel: 00966-1- 4882392 ; Fax: 00966-1- 4418542 Riyadh - 11452 ; P.O.Box - 6770; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia From: [email protected]; [email protected] 713-225-0123 ; (1) DEFENDING HOLY ST. PETERS - The Nuclear Crime Contaminations -- the "Hot" Roentgen Counts, Copyright © 2009. (2) Defending Holy Kaaba- The Nuclear Crime Contaminations © 2009 SEE: http://christianmenchaca.com/publisher.php To: Rewards for Justice ; [email protected] ; [email protected] 202-647-7277 ; U.S. News Media: [email protected] ; [email protected] ;; 202-334-7400

249 of 256 250 of 256

Jennifer Lee, The Slate Group, 703-469-2671 [email protected], 202- 384-8375 ; 415-248- 1225 [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Subject: Fw: #08-9595, U.S. Supreme Court : 24 May Legal CLAIM to Imams & King Abdullah Al Saud, Custodian of Holy Mosques : [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ; Commission For Investigation And Prosecution - Riyadh, Postal Code 11575, City Riyadh Region, P.O.Box 61832, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ; Phone +96614629883 Fax +96614628956 ; E-mail [email protected] ; [email protected] Web Site http://www.cip.gov.sa ; Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers; [email protected] ; Tel: 00966-1- 4882392 ; Fax: 00966-1- 4418542 ; Riyadh - 11452 ; P.O.Box - 6770; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Ladies / Gentlemen: . . The foregoing enclosed is a "PETITION FOR REHEARING OF A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO U.S. COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT " and is submitted for your consideration as custodian of (1) Al-Masjid al-Harām - "The Sacred -and your consideration as custodian of (2) Al-Masjid al ( المسجد الحرام :Mosque" - (Arabic . ( المسجد النبوي :Nabawi - "Mosque of the Prophet" (Arabic . . . These most Holy Mosques could become victims any radical group of or person who counts himself as representing any religious faith or government entity interested to attack a U.S. or U.K. business corporation in the Middle East with Radiological Isotope 'poisons' easily available to anyone at hundreds of "abandoned" open pit Uranium mining excavations located in Pakistan, Iran, Africa, United States, Canada, and Cornwall, England, testing at twenty to thirty percent Uranium in ore assays and 'reading' upwards of 50 m/R to 100 m/R per hour on a Geiger Counter. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires evacuation of a Nuclear Powerplant if its premises 'read' at 2 m/R per hour. The point is that if the Holy Mosques are contaminated with Radiological poisons, the contamination could unintentionally occur by accident if a pilgrim to the Hajj has visited a Radiologically 'stealth-attacked' U.S. or U.K. Bank or other 'stealth-attacked' U.S. or

250 of 256 251 of 256

U.K. business in Saudi Arabia, becomes Radiologically contaminated with 100 m / Rad per hour particles and dust on his clothing, then innocently visits the Kaaba not knowing he is lethally contaminated. The lethal Radiological contaminants fall to the ground everywhere the innocent Pilgrim walks, thereby "cross-contaminating" the Holy Kaaba with Radiological poisons that were originally intended for the U.S. business corporation "'Nuclear Crime' target magnet." Thus, by means of deliberated attack on a U.S. business corporation " 'Nuclear Crime' target magnet," the Holy Kaaba could become lethally contaminated with Radiological Isotope poisons intended only for the U.S. business corporation " 'Nuclear Crime' target magnet." . . . This petition is currently submitted to the United States Supreme Court as indicated herein. It was previously snet by eMail to several Saudi Arabia eMail addresses and also to the International Court of Justice, the Hague, Netherlands. . . . You have been the victim of deception by U.S. business corporations in Saudi Arabia who have apparently not informed you that they are "Nuclear Crime" Targets that may bring great harm to the people of Saudi Arabia and harm to the two Holy Mosques - (1) Al-Masjid al-Harām and (2) Al- Masjid al-Nabawi -- as explained in the enclosed petition to THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Washington, DC 20543-0001, [email protected] . . . It is likely that these Nuclear Crime dangers would "NOT EXIST" if all U.S. Corporations were scheduled to divest and leave Saudi Arabia and leave other countries in the Middle East. . . . Furthermore, it appears highly likely that peace would come to the Middle East if the profit making United States and British UK private business corporations were no longer present as targets of "Nuclear Crime" in the Middle East as their presence in the Middle East is solely to earn large financial profits that benefit entirely themselves while their existence as targets of "Nuclear Crimes" in the Middle East is absolute truth, without question. The owners of U.S. Private Corporations can be replaced while said corporations continue to operate providing benefits to the countries they now occupy. Thus, little or no economic damage occurs to anyone. The U.S and U.K. corporations simply change ownership and names, then continue to operate under Muslim ownership. . . . The U.S. and U.K. owners who have already recouped their investment and made large profits simply divest and leave without loss. . . . U.S. Private Corporation concealment of their "Nuclear Crime" target status is sufficient cause to consider that they represent an extreme danger as "Nuclear Crime" targets that can be voluntarily

251 of 256 252 of 256 removed from the Middle East on a trial basis to determine if peace will replace the dangerous conditions that are created by the unecessary presence of U.S. Private Corporations causing war conditions as "Nuclear Crime" targets in violation of the laws of the Koran. The removal of "Nuclear Crime" targets in the Middle East will have the immediate colatteral effect of removing "Nuclear Crime" danger away from the Middle East and Holy Kaaba, a most worthwhile "peace" situation that can be decided in the Middle East countries, but can be mediated in the U.N. courts. But, why waste breath when this discussion focuses on the obvious criminality of the U.S. and U.K. privately owned corporations who are no better than a gang of criminal thugs exploiting the Middle East countries at the expense of their people and their Holy Kaaba. . . . The answer is most obvious: the United States and British corporation criminals should leave immediately before they must be prosecuted as "Accessories" to "Nuclear Crimes" that they have been aware of for years! This prosecution question should be pursued in Middlke East Courts and in the United Nations courts where United States and British corporation criminals should pay War reparations to victims throughout the Middle East, where their presence obviously and proveably has caused War. . . . The U.S. Military presence can be considered as an entirely different issue. However, it appears to be an unecessary cost and poor strategy to maintain expensive Military bases in the Middle East when the U.S. has a formidable and very mobile Naval force in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea with far more fire power and tactical mobility than its expensive fixed land bases throughout the Middle East, which are stationary targets that can be devastated with well planned, low cost, and easily deployed Radiological poison attacks that can force costly evacuation of every Radiologically contaminated Military base in the Middle East, once the Radiological contamination is deployed to make these geographical areas become Nuclear Poisoned Wastelands where human living conditions are impossible, even for military forces. . . . It is my opinion that U.S. & British Private Corporations should face the closest examination to determine if it is better to prosecute them or that you might consider some other option to allow them to divest and quickly leave Saudi Arabia to remove the danger to the Holy Kaaba and to the Mosque of the Prophet. Let us not forget that the Muslim 'Al-Masjid El-Aqsa Mosque' and Church of The Holy Sepulchere in Jerusalem could also become targets of any radical group of or person who counts himself as representing any religious faith or government entity.

252 of 256 253 of 256

. . . These Holy shrines could be targeted for political reasons that go beyond religion; and, this is why it is important to address the Nuclear Crime issues and remove the U.S. and U.K. corporation flash points of antagonism. . . . It is my opinion that U.S. & British Private Corporations should face the closest examination to determine if it is better to prosecute them or that you might consider some other option to allow them to divest and quickly leave Saudi Arabia to remove the danger to the Holy Kaaba and to the Mosque of the Prophet. Let us not forget that the Muslim 'Al-Masjid El-Aqsa Mosque' and Church of The Holy Sepulchere in Jerusalem could also become targets of any radical group of or person who counts himself as representing any religious faith or government entity. . . . These Holy shrines could be targeted for political reasons that go beyond religion; and, this is why it is important to address the Nuclear Crime issues and remove the U.S. and U.K. corporation flash points of antagonism. . . . My U.S. Supreme Court Petition is enclosed. . . . I request assistance of the Saudi Minister of Justice and other Saudi legal officers to assist me to file these "Qui Tam" complaints in Saudi Courts on behalf of the people of Saudi Arabia and on behalf of my family where I may sue U.S. corporations responsible for these most extreme Radiological contamination problems and they provide both compensation and a solution of the "Nuclear Crime" potentials for the people of Saudi Arabia. . . . I am also seeking Saudi publishers and Producers who might be interested in Publishing my books and screenplays located at http://christianmenchaca.com/publisher.php Most sincerely , Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of PFC Christian Menchaca . . . My U.S. Supreme Court Petition is enclosed. Sincerely , Kenneth MacKenzie

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No.08-9595 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

253 of 256 254 of 256

(1) Kenneth MacKenzie, appearing Properia Persona as Plaintiff “Pro Se” appearing on his own behalf with family class members similarly situated, (2) Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, as Plaintiff, Aunt of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca (sister of Claimant Guadalupe Vasquez), (3) Guadalupe Vasquez, as Plaintiff, Mother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, Mother of (4) Caesar Vasquez Menchaca, as Plaintiff, Brother of Pfc. Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, family class members similarly situated — PETITIONERS Class Action regarding: (1) The four Geneva Conventions (I,II,III,IV) of 12 August 1949 for the protection of war victims Vs Defendant #1, U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States — RESPONDENT(S) PROOF OF SERVICE I, Kenneth MacKenzie, do swear or declare that on this date, 19 MAY 2009, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have served the enclosed U.S. Supreme Court Rule 15: PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF , Notice of 'Qui Tam' Claim For Damage, Injury And Death on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days. The names and addresses of those served are as follows: U.S. Justice Department, United States Executive Branch Of Government, Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States; Erik Holder, Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE: Houston/Galveston Division: Mail: P.O. Box 61129 , Houston, TX 77208; TO: Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Office of the Solicitor General, Care Of Neal Katyal, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001 Phone: 202-514- 2217/18 hours 9:00 am to 5:30 pm, M-F 202-514-2203 [email protected] ; [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected]

254 of 256 255 of 256

,[email protected] , . . . . . To: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Lee Caplan & John B. Bellinger III, Office of Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , (202) 647-0748; [email protected]; Kimberly A. Gahan, Attorney-Adviser, International Claims & Investment Disputes Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 , tel: (202) 776-8431; email: [email protected] ; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , . . . . . To: U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The Hague, The Netherlands, [email protected] , ( http://www.icc-cpi.int/home.html&l=en) [email protected] [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] al-Kaʿbah ): WAR CRIME CLAIM (U.A.E.), ICC Court against U.S. : Potential ) الكعبة . :SUBJECT al-Kaʿbah ) & Radiological Contamination of 3.5 ) الكعبة of Radiological Contamination of Holy million HAJJ PILGRIMS in Meccah, Saudi Arabia . . . .1. WAR CRIME court venue: U.S. Court Case H-08-60 filed in U.N. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (ICC, Prosecutor, Case # OTP-CR-100/08, PO Box 19519, 2500 CM, The

255 of 256 256 of 256

Hague, The Netherlands, email [email protected] , http://www.icc- cpi.int/home.html&l=en) : (1) U.S. business targets in Monaco, Vatican, & France, Europe, potential victims of Nuclear Contamination Crimes : 'Nuclear-Crime' Contamination of Holy Kaaba & 3.5 million HAJJ PILGRIMS in Maccah, 2008: . . . .FROM: Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of PFC Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, H. Phone:;U.S. Court Case H-08-60; . . . . eBook titles : http://www.kristianmenchaca.com ; . . . . Screen Play : http://www.writesafe.com/storage8/CANCOPY_cvrAfAmp_MATT.pdf ; http://www.writesafe.com/storage9/PRINCESS_22Jan05.pdf © 1997, 2004, 2005

. . . The Author most gratefully acknowledges Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, as a source for his quotations of Wikipedia photographs and Wikipedia supplemental text describing the history of great Mosques and man-portable Nuclear weapons and the Terrorists who tortured to death Pvt. Kristian Kenchaca and Pvt. Thomas Tucker as cited in this book. Should the reader desire further more detailed information on the history of these great mosques or Nuclear Weapons and terrorists, the Author recommends Wikipedia sites as follows: See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masjid_al-Haram SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_uranium_mines SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_Atomic_Demolition_Munition ; SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Muhajer

256 of 256