Legal and Political Rehabilitation Of

CEU eTD Collection

DRAGOLJUB MIHAILOVI In partial fulfillmentof In requirementsthe for partial degree of the LEGAL REHABILITATION OF ANDPOLITICAL Advisors: Professor Maria KovacsAdvisors:Professor Maria Ć AND THE YUGOSLAVINĆ AND THE ARMY HOMELAND THE Nationalism Studies Program Studies Nationalism Central European University Central Professor FlorianProfessor Bieber Budapest, Hungary Budapest, Jelena Đureinović Jelena Master ofArtsMaster Submitted Submitted to 2014 By

CEU eTD Collection purposeofdelegitimization the politics with ofpost history restorative the of context wider of the in it serviceputs and Chetniks the the of rehabilitation political in been have which textbooks and projects media commemorations, legislation, at looks thesis The 2000. after prominent more became it but years, 30 last in rehabilitati ongoingpolitical of because and retribution define not does which law 2006 bythe processed been have cases rehabilitation the because act, symbolic a represents Homeland the in Army new offer to intends argui by topic research the on perspectives This Homeland. the in Army Yugoslav the of leader the Mihailović, Dragoljub of rehabilitation legal analyse to was research the of aim second The an 2006 of Acts Rehabilitation the at looking by implementation its and Serbia in rehabilitation legal of problems the addresses thesis This on the Chetniks. Reevaluation of the Chetniks has been present in Serbian Society Serbian in present been has Chetniks the of Reevaluation Chetniks. the on ng that legal rehabilitation of Mihailović and the Yugoslav the and Mihailović of rehabilitation legal that ng Abstract d i

2011 and the completed rehabilitation cases. cases. rehabilitation completed the and 2011 - 1945 Yugoslavia.

CEU eTD Collection Felix thank Lemke to want great support throughout process. forthe entire this th this help, their Without skills. writing my improve me helped and process writing whole the during me with worked have who Writing Eszter thank to like especially would I I Serbialiterature needed from whenI the allme gethelped Natašawho Obradović,as as well veryhelpful, also were Perović Miloš and Petakov Zoran case. the in developments newest the with updated me kept and me to rehabi the in proceedings the of transcripts the provided very solvealso research this Aleksandarand issues to Iam grateful Sekulović, the I had. who outline me helped me to gave they which comments useful Very guidance. Kovac their for Bieber, Maria professors supervisors, my thank to like would I all, of First Acknowledgments was not able to go to was there able myself. not Timar esis would not turn out the way it is. Finally, I Finally, is. it way the out turn not would esis ii and Agnes Toth from the Center for Academic Academic for Center the from Toth Agnesand

litation case of Dragoljub Mihailović Dragoljub of case litation

ad Florian and s CEU eTD Collection 3.2. Commissions 3.1. PartiesThe Political and Politics: History Chronology YUGOSLAV ARMYTHE IN THE CHAPTEROFF III. 2.3.3. The division among intellectuals 2.3.2. Reactionsof society civil 2.3.1. Reactions in the region 2.3. Contestation 2.2.3. The issues in the rehabilitationprocess 2.2.2. Historians witnesses as expert 2.2.1. proceedingsThe first 2.2. Rehabilitationof Dragoljub Mihailović 2.1.2. Rehabilitationof Bogdan and Lončar Milenko Braković 2.1.1. ofAnalysis rehabilitation cases 2.1. Rehabilitation in Practice REHABILICHAPTER II. 1.6 1.5. The Debate Rehabilitation about of1.4. Legislation in the History Service Politics Revisionism1.3. Historical Serbia in 1.2. Useand of Revisionism History Historical 1.1. ofThe Change theCulture ofRemembrance SERBIA HIST THE CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ABSTRACT . Rehabilitationof Dragoljub Mihailovi

......

...... ORYPOLITICS THE ON ICIALCULTURE REM OF

TATION OF DRAGOLJUB ......

......

...... HOMELAND

......

...... ć

...... iii ......

......

...... SECOND WORLD WARIN EMBRANCETHE ON MIHAILOVI ......

......

...... Ć ......

......

60 30

27 23 19 15 13 62 60 55 53 47 46 45 40 37 37 34 32 30 .

9 1 II 9 I

CEU eTD Collection BIBLIOGRAPHY CONCLUSION 3.5. Television Projects 3.4. The Chetniks in the Post 3.3. Commemorations

......

...... - 200 0 Textbooks ...... iv

......

79 77

73 70 66

CEU eTD Collection 3 2 1 Milošević Second World the and past communist the the of continuation a as perceived revisitneed to a "unfinishedrevolution" theand of notionwhy regime. is the communist That was and nineties the throughout persisted which Yugoslavia and of dissolution the followed which nineties the had has Serbia nineties. the in started revolution" overcome was period communist stronger grew completed been not had communism from separation the that thought the when later, came post the in present immediately not was societies democratizing the by wi dealt be to had which period historical a was communism that idea the that argues Mark region. the in regimes communist the of tool legitimizing a was war the War,that especially resto the of topic important Another period. communist the criticizing on focused politics history employed

Ibid, xv Ibid, Haven(New London:and Yalexiv University 2010), Press, James Mark, Orwell,George ic te al f omns, ot onre i Cnrl n Esen uoe have Europe Eastern and Central in countries most communism, of fall the Since In countries such as the Baltic States, Hungary or Poland, the process of "finishing of the process States, BalticHungarythe Poland, as the suchor Incountries

in 2000. in .

The 2 Ti i wa h cls te niihd eouin, real a revolution", unfinished "the calls he what is This . 1984

Unfinished Revolution:Making Sense of theSenseUnfinishedRevolution:Making Communist CentralPast in of rative history politics has been the interwar period and the Second World Second the and period interwar the been has politics history rative

, (London: Penguin, 2008), 37Penguin,(London: , 2008),

rbeai and problematic

Introduction

Warappeare completely be to order in revisited be to needs

Who "Who controls"Who past, the a different experience, due to the wars in in wars the to due experience, different a

controls present, the controls past" the d

in Serbia much later, after the fall of later,fall muchSerbia the after in Slobodan Milošević's Slobodan - 1989 years. This idea idea This years. 1989 controls the future: - zto ta the that ization EasternEurope

regime regime , th th 1

CEU eTD Collection Serbia of Assembly National the by 2006 in adopted first was thethem World Second the War,during Serbia territoryof the granting in active was which movement 2004, in Law Nati legislation. The the state textbooks, the in present is Chetniks the of reevaluation The 1943. until Alliesthe of side the on officially were they po other in movements similar the than reevaluated bywas taken same state. happenedThe the many to Chetniks. supporters ofthe post faced Mihailovi Dragoljub including movement, this of members Many war. the after regime Yugoslav the by c criminals war and traitors as labeled were constant they why also is which Partisans, included also activities wartime Their Bosnia. in mostly cleansing, ethnic and crimes war for responsible were and forces Italian and German Mihailovi of reevaluation the Yugoslav Army Homeland (the the in in InsurgentUkrainian Army the and Nationalists Ukrainian ofOrganization the of reevaluation the as Similar country. the of liberation the and Partisans the of glorification the on based World Warquesti and period politicsRestorative in history Serbia reevaluation and the of the Ukraine since the nineties, revisiting the Second World Second positive revisitingthethe Warincludes nineties, Serbiathe since in Ukraine During the Second World War, the Chetniks engaged in the collaboration with the the with collaboration the in engaged Chetniks the War, World Second the During Second the on based been has 2000 since Serbia in politics history restorative The Another law as a part of the Serbian restorative Serbian Rehabilitation ofthe Another the history part as a law politics, Act, officially be to andHowever, easier Chetniks rehabilitated the makes which factor one

right pension. to ć - , among other things., among other war trials and were sentenced to death or death to sentenced were and trials war hc recognized which onal Assembly of Republic of Serbia adopted a change to the Veteran to change a adopted Serbia of onal Republic Assembly of

oning of the historical policies of the of Yugoslav policies historical the of wereoning which state, - funded media projects, publishing, public discourse but also in also but discourse public publishing, projects, media funded

h Cenk tgte wt te atsn a a antifascist an as Partisans the with together Chetniks the 2

st long prison time, while their property their while time, prison long - omns cutis s h fc that fact the is countries communist Chetniks ) and their leader their leader ) and Dragoljub ahs ih h Yugoslav the with lashes Ch n refers and etnik movement

to the legal legal the to

ć , CEU eTD Collection 4 re the allows which Noneofthese authors ofthe significance. on its the Rehabilitationtackled aspect Act of2006 Serbia sho which retribution economic on legislation the of lack the only criticize and past authoritarian the with terms to coming of way crucial a as law thesee adopted, was law rehabilitationbefore the legislation the for hopingbeen had by the Yugoslav regime. persecution their for reasons political or ideological of basis the on possible members its of oc Italian and German the on. with collaborated going and crimes still war committed Homeland is the Yugoslav the in and ArmyAlthough 2010 in Belgrade in Court High the at started which the 1946, in with trial case the also is That Dragoljub of 2011. process rehabilitation and 2006 between filed requests of thousands been had there and 2006 of law the to according processed are 2011 before filed requests specif been not had what impossible, War World Second the during crimes war or occupation with collaboration the in engaged who people the of rehabilitation the made 2011which in adopted Rehabilitationwas Actnew The politic for killed or sentenced people the of rehabilitation

AutoritativneProšlosti” ( AdvancedLegal Studies, 2008);Jovica Trkulja, t of Reexamination andSignificanceMoral RehabilitationofVictimsofthe the ofPolitical Repression 2; 2004), AleksandarJugovi Hereticus,ofPastJournalReexamination the for Nebojša similar rehabilitation.opinionthe about publishtheir for(Belgrade: Center AdvancedMost Legalhistorians Studies,2008). other of thelegal who and experts Hereticus,ofPast:JournalReexamination the Controversiesfor inRehabilitationSerbia,the about 4 . Although they recognize the weaknesses of the Rehabilitation Act, they focus more focus they Act,Rehabilitation the of weaknesses the recognize they Although . There has been a debate about the legal rehabilitation in Serbi in rehabilitation legal the about debate a been has There

Š arki works injournal for works Hereticus the Center of the AdvancedLegalin haveStudies Belgrade the ć ,

“ Potreba Donošenja Zakona o Rehabilitaciji”Donošenja ZakonaPotreba o ( hePast: habilitation of the quislings and the people who committed war crimes. war committed who people the and quislings the of habilitation RehabilitationMeasureasa ofLegala Overcomin

ControversiesSerbiain Rehabilitationthe about ć cupation, the formulation of the 2006 law makes the rehabilitation the makes law 2006 the of formulation the cupation, , " Društveni iDruštveniZnačajMoralniŢrtavaPoltičke Rehabilitacije Represije”

Mihailovi “ ied in detail in the 2006 version of the law. The law. the of version 2006 the in detail in ied , 2/2004, (Belgrade: for, 2/2004, Center Adva Rehabilitacija kao MeraPravnog Savladavanja Rehabilitacija kao *** 3 uld be included in the rehabilitation process in process rehabilitation the in included be uld ć

wo a be snecd o et atr the after death to sentenced been had who ,

Need to PassLawRehabilitationNeedato on al or ideological reasons after 1941. after reasons ideological or al g of the of g AuthoritarianPast ,(Belgrade:2/2008, for Center a. Some authors, who authors, Some a. ) , Hereticus,Journal for ncedLegal Studies,

2/2008 ) ( . Social ) , CEU eTD Collection 6 5 thesis. Mihailovi ofrehabilitation the ongoingof thewithprocess topics these legitimation they and connect its Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of aspects important very all are pr the in historians bythe testimonies the and 1946 Mihailovi of responsibility command the of issue the Homeland, the in Army Sekulovi Mihailovi Dragoljub problem ofrehabilitation.the Dragoljub of process rehabilitation Mihailovi the of study case the to them connecting and 2011 l rehabilitation the comparing By 2011. in adopted was law the of version new the before written been had works the of most and law the of analysis the in detail into historical of aspect legal a as re it describing possible, quislings and criminals war the Others

visionism and restorative memory politics in Serbia. However, the authors cited do not go go not do cited authors the However, Serbia. in politics memory restorative and visionism Corectnessthe Trialof Mihailovićinandof Dragoljub 1946 Processof theof Rehabilitationhis iPravnojGodineDraţi Mihailoviću1946. o Valjanostiza Njegovu Rehabilitaciju”Postupka ( Mihailovićin Serbia“. TomislavDuli ofthe Antifascistsof2013) Serbia, in PolitičkoDragoljubaSuĎenje” Mihailovićakao ( Past Rehabilitation Act 2012); Vladimir Vodneli inRevisionism Serbia (2004 Paradigma Primenakao MilanRadanovi Reactions, Reactions, SuĎenje”( Antifascistsof2013);Serbia, VesnaRaki J Rehabilitaciji: Ne Rehabilitaciji: Javna Reagovanja NeRehabilitaciji:

, VI, 2/2008,Belgra , VI, 5

hr hv be fw cdmc ok daig ih h rhbltto poes of process rehabilitation the with dealing works academic few been have There

- criticize the Rehabilitation Act for its formulation which makes the rehabilitation of rehabilitation the makes which formulation its for Act Rehabilitation the criticize 2011)in itsand RevisionImplementationthePast Service of thethe of Paradigmasaof Historical ć ć ć

and Raki and te d no do they , on perspective deeper a offer and knowledge existing the to add will thesis this , RehabilitationofDragoljub MihailovićPoliticaasa (Belgrade: Associationofthe Antifascists of2013) Serbia, ć , “ ć avna Reagovanja avna Sentenced "for PoliticalSentenced "for Ideologicaland Reasons"? TheDraţaRehabilitationof Dragoljub , “ – Zakonodavna PolitikaZakonodavna i SluţbiVladeRepublikeSrbijeu Revizije Prošlosti Njena

ć Sad StorySad Possiblea with EndHappy - ) ć Vodneli , in , Sociologija bcue t s eet n ogig Te r The ongoing. and recent is it because ,

de: Center for Center de: AdvancedLegal Studies; VesnaRaki ć Istorijskog RevizionizmaSrbiji”Istorijskog u ( t engage in a wider analysis of the questions I will address in the the in address will I questions the of analysis wider a in engage t ,

Antifašizam Juče i DanasJučei Antifašizam “ Zakon o Rehabilitaciji: Zakono TuţnaPričaSrećnimKrajem”sa Moţda (

(

, 54 (4), , (2012); AleksandarSekulovi

NoRehabilitation: to PublicReactions deal

( s No the to Rehabilitation:Publ ć

- with the wartime activities and crimes of the Yugoslav the of crimes and activities wartime the with Vodneli RehabilitationofDragoljub MihailovićPolitical asa Trial ć , 4 , (Novi Sad:, Ass “

Rehabilitacija Dragoljuba Mihailovića kao Političko RehabilitacijaDragoljubakao Mihailovića ) ocess of the rehabilitation. the these of Althoughocess , Hereticus,ofReexamination the Journalfor LegislativeRepublicthe Policy of ofSerbia l Trial ) ociation ofociation Antifascists ofSerbia, , in ,

icReactions ć , No to the Rehabilitation: PublicRehabilitation: the to No ) “ , O Pravnoj Pravnoj ValjanostiO SuĎenja ć (Belgrade: Association of the - Vodneli sac dn b Duli by done esearch ) , ć (Belgrade: Association , ć “ aws of 2006 and and 2006 of aws Rehabilitacija

and questioning and ć The On the Legal Onthe , the trial in trial the , ) , in ,

Ne ) ć , , CEU eTD Collection rehabilitation legal the to of the official relation the good is a study it for practice and case the problematicin is rehabilitationofthe laws implementation showswhybecausethe it research ofremembrance Serbia in culture since 2000 state funded the text and projectsbooks. and official the of analysis the with support to intend I which Serbia, in politics history official w act symbolic a is measure legal this that is argument My rehabilitated. because formality, legal a Mihailovi represent only would rehabilitation his that fact the is which Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the about discourse the to aspect another also add to different of analysis of aspects thorough a offer not do here analyzed and Serbia, cited works in the rehabilitation because legal about knowledge existing the in gap the fill will research only law 2006 the to according processed cases rehabilitation the makes which defined, retribution financial no is there that is issue Another rehabilitation. oppose would non contenti using by processed be should cases rehabilitation that later decided Court Supreme The case. particular a for charge in judge a the to everything leaving courts, in the to limitations arise which issues The rehabilitated. co implementation be could criminal war or collaborator a was who someone whether question not does which itself formulation the in only not are Mihailovi Dragoljub and Yugoslavthe Homeland of the rehabilitation in political Army completed already the of light rehabilita legal of significance the is RehabilitationWhat Acts? the of implementation In this thesis, I intend to answer the following questions: What problems arise in the the in arise problems What questions: following the answer to intend I thesis, this In h cs suy f h rhbltto o Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of study case The ous proceeding, which means that there cannot be another side in the process, which which process, the in side another be cannot there that means which proceeding, ous ć the Rehabilitation the

and the and Yugoslav completely already politically been have Homeland the Armyin e rm h fc ta te a de nt rvd ay ntutos or instructions any provide not does law the that fact the from me ć ? I will argue that the weaknesses of the 2006 Rehabilitation Act Rehabilitation 2006 the of weaknesses the that argue will I ?

Acts and their implementation. Wit implementation. their and Acts *** 5

Mihailovi h this research, I would like like would I research, this h ć

is the subject of this this of subject the is ih elcs the reflects hich symbolic. My symbolic. tion in in tion

ć - , CEU eTD Collection content analysis to look at the testimonies of historians. The same method will be used also in in usedalso be will method same historians. testimoniestheThe of at look analysis to content be practice. can in law this problematic how see will we completed, been have which cases other some to referring and Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of process the analyzing By forces. Axis the with war committed individual the whether matter no reasons, ideological court actual the or regarding political of basis the on only rehabilitation and manipulation instructions for space leaves It processes. any give not does it and reasons ideological or politi on based killed or sentenced was someone if except rehabilitation the of conditions fact this makes just and it easier. the if even Serbia in Chetniks the of reevaluation the at looking However, 1943. post other until in tendencies Allies the of side the on officially were they that Nedi Milan as such people controversial more than rehabilitated and ideol communist anti and nationalist a had which Chetniks, the movement, resistance another of construction provided Partisans of role the and War World Second the of events The nationalism. Serbian of legitimation is purpose whose Titoism, post of delegitimization and from separation a of context larger the figures historical prominent most Second the in World War Serbia. in the of one of rehabilitation legal the about is it that is study case this of choice my supports Second the on narrative historical This case is also an example of co of example an also is case This wl lo a the at look will I any specify not does it because problematic highly is 2006 of Rehabilitation Act The ogy. One factor which makes the Chetniks easier to be officially bereevaluated to easier Chetniks the makes which ogy. factor One

legitimacy to Tito and Yugoslavia. This further implies a focus and and focus a implies further This Yugoslavia. and Tito to legitimacy - communist countries, it has to be noted that there would have been been have would there that noted be to has it countries, communist

rncit fo te rceig ad s te ehd f critical of method the use and proceedings the from transcripts

the Yugoslav Partisans are questioned, especially because the the because especially questioned, are Partisans Yugoslav the

World War in Serbia. Another important argument which argument important Another Serbia. in WorldWar mpeting historical narratives in Serbia and reflects and Serbia in narratives historical mpeting 6

y had not fought on the side of the Allies, Allies, the of side the on fought not had y

crimes or collaborated collaborated or crimes - or Dimitrije Ljoti Dimitrije or 95 uolva and Yugoslavia 1945 ć , is , cal ć -

CEU eTD Collection language.Serbian in only exist sources all as English, to translation my offer will I here, mentioned sources For law. 2011 the by improved was what and is the problem what understand to order in Act, Rehabilitation the of versions two the at looking for used be will analysis comparative of method The Act. Rehabilitation the of implementation provide to order in cases rehabilitation completed the of decisions court the at look also will I Serbia. in topic relevant permanently a being process this to contribute media as such newspapers prominent Politika, most the in published articles the selected I Vojvodina, Dragolj at looking reh the of case court the at look will I Second, cases. rehabilitation completed few a of analysis sub the rehabilitation, regarding problems the of analysis the Besides sub three case with way. issuesso, which some if in and, solved law 2011 the if and are there problems of kind what see to order in them, compare then and separately them analyze will I 2011. and 2006 from Serbia in Acts Rehabilitation thesis the put bltto o Mihailovi of abilitation , among intellectuals and in the civil society and the complaints and law suits filed filed suits law and complaints the and society civil the in and intellectuals among , ub In the first chapter, after giving the historical and theoretical background which will which background theoretical and historical the giving after chapter, first the In In the second chapter, the focus of the thesis will move to the rehabilitation in practicerehabilitation the in to move will thesis chapter,second of the focus Inthe the Večernje -

chapters. First, I wil I First, chapters. study of the rehabilitation process of Dragoljub Mihailovi Dragoljub of process rehabilitation the of study Mihailović. h reactions the oi i te otx o hsoia rvsoim n Serbia in revisionism historical of context the in topic

Novosti and Blic. The reactions these proceedings caused in the regional regional the in caused proceedings these reactions The Blic. and Novosti

eie te w rgoa mda Denk n Rdo Television Radio and Dnevnik media, regional two the Besides

in the Serbian media surrounding the rehabilitation process of of process rehabilitation the surrounding media Serbian the in ć and look at the transcripts and the choice of the witnesses. witnesses. the of choice the and transcripts the at look and ć l look at the implementation of Rehabilitation Acts in Serbia. in Acts Rehabilitation of implementation the at look l

*** 7

the purpose of the analysis of the the of analysis the of purpose the - ć chapter will include an an include will chapter

and it will consist of of consist will it and

more context for the the for context more I ,

will look at the the at look will

CEU eTD Collection Homeland has been the alreadyin normalized and politically Serbian in society. rehabilitated the show by to published order also that in books are Yugoslav which state, text the and Army national Serbian the fit they officia howthe analyzealso will I narrative. show to order in context this in Acts Rehabilitation the put will I 2000. since Serbia in Yugoslavia and War World Second the about politics from region,the come civilsociety historians. and which rehabilitation the following media the in reactions the at look briefly will I Finally, The third chapter will go back to the wider c wider the to back go will chapter third The l culture of remembrance, state funded media projects media funded state remembrance, of culture l 8

ontext and look at the official memory official the at look and ontext

CEU eTD Collection Yugoslavall by shared be nations. to supposed was which memory historical v of associations the with together Yugoslav Army.regime The Red the like force foreign a by liberated not was country the and authentic was World movement resistance the War. because special was That country the of foundations the as Front of 1.1. Culture TheRemembranceChange the of historiography.and difference the and history of use the of background theoretical the introduce to necessary is it that, Before eighties. the in Worldstarted War Second which the on view the of change the and Serbia in revisionism Mihailovi Dragoljub of process rehabilitation was on. founded state communist the narratives historical the from separation the and questioning involves Yugoslav the of victory the on Part based politics history employed it and point historical legitimizing main the was war the Yugoslav regime, the For politically identification. social for topics been has War World Second The in instrumentalized period. Yugoslav the and War World CHAPTER I. TheI. HistoryCHAPTER Politics theSecond on World War in sn ad h lbrto o te onr. ht s h te eaain rm communism from separation the why is That country. the of liberation the and isans hs hpe wl pt h ise o rehabilitation of issues the put will chapter This Second the period, interwar the are Serbia in politics history the of topics main The uolv itrorpy a bsd n h rmmrne f h Ntoa Liberation National the of remembrance the on based was historiography Yugoslav

the region since it ended and has represented one of the most important most the of one represented has and ended it since region the trn wre o te rain n mitnne f h common the of maintenance and creation the on worked eterans

between historical revisionism and revision as a a as revision and revisionism historical between

were laid in the antifascist resistance in the Second the in resistance antifascist the in laid were Serbia 9

in the theoretical context of historical historical of context theoretical the in

legislation

in method in method

eba n the and Serbia Yugoslavia was

history history CEU eTD Collection 8 7 emigrated whonot from had Chetniks Yugoslavia persecution as faced well. to sentenced Mihailovi Dragoljub and movement criminal and collaborationist a considered was Homeland Yugoslavthe the war, in Army the do. After not did them of many what is which K Liberation Armyinstead. the atand Teheranthem People's for support theto was made decision thein conference 1943 support the abandon Alliesthe made forces, German and Italian the with collaborating were non the against Partisans the against often fighting war, the throughout continued which forces, German from arms demanding first by 1941 in alreadycollaboration rapidl stronger getting were Partisans the as However, war. the of beginning the at Partisans) (the ArmyLiberation People's the with together fighting were towards the going was country the the as eighties in the in obvious regime most the Yugoslav became it the but already, seventies by condemned people and movements the on perspective Instead, republics. all from historians historiograp the between dialogue and archives relevant the during Sec the traitors domestic the and occupier the against struggle common "the of myth the on founded

Milivoj Nationalism JasnaDragovi AKO, 2013), 87 AKO,2013), ofPast: HistoricalAbout inRevisionismPost the in: Srbiji”( PolitičkaUpotreba Prošlosti: IstoriO The Yugoslav Army in the Homeland was officially on the side of the Allies and they and the Alliesof side the officiallyon was Homeland YugoslavThe the in Army opening debates, with revision needed have would historiography official Yugoslav h prpcie n h Ygsa Am i te oead tre mr notably more started Homeland the in Army Yugoslav the on perspective The The Chetnik Movement ofThe ChetnikMovement Bešlin

hy became focused more on creating national histories and a change of the the of change a and histories national creating on more focused became hy dissolution.

(London: Hurst & Co, 2002) &Hurst Co, (London: the of members other Many 1946. in collaboration and crimes war for death ond World War" service ofrevolution historiography the and was in put ć , " - - Serbian population, mostly in Bo in mostly population, Serbian Soso, Soso,

Četnički Pokret Draţe Mihailovića:Najfrekventniji IstorijskogČetničkiPokret RevizionizmaObjekat u 'Saviors of the Nation': Serbia's Intellectual OppositionNation':Serbia'sthe the ofIntellectual 'Saviors and Revival of

ing Petar II made a call to all Chetniks to join the Partisan forces, Partisan the join to Chetniks all to call a made II Petar ing

Draţa jskomRevizionizmu Postjugoslovenskomna Prostoru , 70 , Mihailović:FrequentSubject Revisionism to Thein Most Serbia

- YugoslavMomir ed. Space, 10

snia, which, together with the fact that they that fact the with together which, snia, 8 Te as cmitd a crimes war committed also They . y, they started engaging in in engaging started they y, Samardţić

et al, (Noviet Sad:

( Political Use 7 .

was ) , CEU eTD Collection 13 12 11 10 9 overcoming in turn Serbiathe in past after 2000 the the of attitude mon the reevaluating still and politics historical Chetniks Yugoslav the with away deal to wanting o the On organizing 1991. started Church Orthodox Serbian Ljoti Dimitrije The for commemorations 1994. in award Year the of Book abo book Vuk party, this of leader The church. and museum memorial the built they where Gora, Ravna at gatherings and commemorations organizing started Movement Chetnik During historiography Yugoslav of war the of perception the with together then, started values Bešlin repression from people Serbian the protect to order in occupation the with collaborated occasionally which movement antifascist the as them representing and War World Second changi eighties, the in changing

(Zagreb: Disput, 2008), 159 2008), (Zagreb:Disput, (Culture in1941 History Textbooksin S DubravkaStojanovi Vuk Ibid Former Yugoslavia Nineties DevedesetihStoljeća”XXGodina ( Goldstein89; Ibid, Ivo andHutinec, Goran " LuxemburgStiftung, 2011), 263 AnalysisProcessesofoftheSocial Transformation u Izgubljeno Tranziciji:Kritička Procesa Analiza Društvene Transformacije MilanRadanovi mns mda rjcs r ulsig Radanovi publishing. or projects media uments,

Drašković argues that the the that argues h ofca clue f eebac o te eod ol Wr newn a g a underwent War World Second the of remembrance of culture official The Slobodan s mainly came from the opposition and some institutions. The Serbian Renewal Renewal Serbian The institutions. some and opposition the from came mainly s 12 t rglu Mihailovi Dragoljub ut )

ofRemembranceHistoricalandPast 1941: the Clashes Overcoming , but it did not tackle these topics at the official the level topics commemorations,these at in so tackle not much, did it , but , in: , Revizija Prošlosti Revizija Prostorimana JugoslavijeBivše Milošević , ther hand, the regime had an ambiguous way of looking at the past, not not past, the at looking of way ambiguous an had regime the hand, ther ć No

, " Milošević ) ć IstorijskaSrbijiPolitikau posl , ed. ed. Vera , ć

Đ , " enerala Revizija Revizije: 1941. u Revizija UdţbenicimaSrbiji”1941. u Revizije: ( Istorije delegitimization of the communist paradigm based on the antifascist the on based paradigm communist the of delegitimization

regime towards defining history politics what prepared and caused caused and prepared what politics history defining towards regime

Katz,(Sarajevo:Institute History,for 191 2007),

rule (Belgrade: Srpska ReSrpska (Belgrade: erbia

Some ofinAspectsRevisionism inHistoriography Croatian the ) in the nineties, the reevaluation and commemorations of the the commemorationsof and reevaluation the nineties, the in g h preto aot h rl te htis a i the in had Chetniks the role the about perception the ng ć , in , “ , Kultura Sećanja 1941: Povijesnii LomoviProšlosti1941: Svladavanje KulturaSećanja No ć Mln Nedi Milan , Neki AspektiRevizionizma ć

Đ enerala” e 2000” ( 2000” e ) 11 , ed.Petar , Atanackovi č , 1994) ,

13 Historicalin2000 Politics Serbia after ć 11 .

, which was shortlisted for the NIN's NIN's the for shortlisted was which , n Daojb Mihailovi Dragoljub and ć

(Revision claims that it was the the was it that claims u Hrvatskoju Istoriografiji ć

et al, (Belgrade:et Ros

of the Past in Past ofSpaceofthe the ( ) Lost inLost Transition:Critical , ed.Sulejman al., et Bosto

RevisionRevision:ofthe Drašković ć

ambiguous a already in in already ) , wrote a a wrote , , in , reat reat

10 9 . .

CEU eTD Collection 14 suitable ideology with its it replacing and historical delegitimizing Yugoslaviaof purpose a have politics history and restorative strategiesof state World Second the Warthe and on remembrance of culture changed the of purpose The state. represents official this it the powerabout in topic, history politicians among the p consensus no is there although and Homeland the Yugoslav in the Army of anniversaries of an consider discourse public and academic and textbooks legislation, the who Chetniks, the by replaced and minimized is country the of liberation the in Partisan the of role Finally, the Education. in present also is It and monuments. calendar official and the commemorations, veterans as on such legislation policies remembrance the rehabilitation, also but discourse, academic and historiography only Yu during negative as judged movements terror” communist andpast socialist Yugoslav the the nation under “sufferingthe of the emphasizing experience, post the in revisionism fit. not non does the Party where Communist history the national by new led movement a of creation the for strives and regime and Yugoslav historiograph rejects it readings all, of previous First field. my this in on research based identified have I which characteristics main three fall of the change after

Samardţić Context SrĎan

Milošević ) , in ,

antifascist movement. et al, (N et

Political Use of Past: HistoricalUsethePoliticalof Revisionism in Post About , " Istorijski Revizionizam i Društveni Kontekst” Kontekst” ( IstorijskiiRevizionizamDruštveni 14 oviSad: 23 AKO,2013), . Second, this new history politics in Serbia reevaluates the people and and people the reevaluates Serbia in politics history new this Second, . - Slobodan Milošević Slobodan Yugoslavhistorica the minimizes space

h tx bos witn n pbihd by published and written books, text the The state representatives participated in the celebrations the in participated representatives state The

olva o terclaoain hs nlds not includes This collaboration. their for goslavia

and the change of regime in Serbia in 2000. It has 2000.It in has Serbia changein ofregime the and 12

narratives. HistoricalSocialandRevisionism Milošević

l significance and criminalizes and significance l - YugoslavSpace

y as manipulated by the the by manipulated as y xlis ht historical that explains h Ministry the , ed. Momir ed. , olitics of the ofthe olitics - national national

of of CEU eTD Collection 18 17 16 15 of understanding their and community ethnic an of members the of memories the represents overlooked are by process this in engage historians which remembering those n ideologically while are past, facts ofthe convenient revisionist and existence in nation that brought which wars or violence forgetting especially forgetting, involves collectiv nation the every that of memory argues also Billig century. the of half than more after again histories nation with started which and eighties the of end the manyc to applied nation” the of creation the in element crucial a is “forgetting that explains constructs century, used to been have past the about narratives legitimation political understandingof moral fortheuseful considered hasbeen it and the truth for search objective being than rather morality, or politics of service the in been often has history time, present the to and renaissance the through antiquity from that explains Suny state. and t with dealing and nationalism and nation to related been always have history of perception the and History andHistory 1.2. of Historical Use Revisionism

(SanDiego: 336 Academic2001), Press, RonaldG. Suny, in„History“, MichaelBillig, 11 1990), Renan,isin Ernest „What Nation?“, a 336 Ibid, new not are politics history and purposes different for history of use The In a similar way, “ethno similar nation Ina memorya collective the of calls Smith The past and its use are not related only to remembering, but also forgetting. Renan forgetting. also but remembering, to only related not are use its and past The 16

he past has been an important part of the creation and existence of every nation every of existence and creation the of part important an been has past he 18 Banal Nationalism Banal .

ountries, especially those which had been part of communist regimes until regimes communist of part been had which those especially ountries, 15 . Especially since the appearance of the modern nation in 18 in nation modern the of appearance the since Especially .

Encyclopedia of Nationalism: FundamentalNationalism: of Encyclopedia Themes,

(London:Sage36 Publications,1995), Nation and Nation Narration,

provide legitimacy for these new political newpolitical these legitimacyprovide for

ed. Homy ed. Bha J. -

n sae ulig n nw national new and building state and

bhaRoutledge,(London: ed. ed. Alexanderj.Motyl 17

- which could be could which history”, which history”,which ot appropriateot a completely a phenomena th

and 19 and th e .

CEU eTD Collection 24 23 22 21 20 19 them contract and meaning their "twisting outright" also but facts, historical the reexamining na the in well, as using be will their of accounts therapeutic collective" hear or read promote, to institutions their and people "the s in historiography revisionist of persistence the that explains absurdity and alienation of sense a of elimination the and myths national selfthrough of promotion the nation, a of guilt historical the of denial the include things, values cognitive therapeutic on based is historiography revisionist "revisionisthistoriography". This to opposed revision",as "historiographic or historiography" discipl historiography because revisionists are historians all way that in states, Tucker moti present the put to and present the justify to order in it change to present, the of needs the to past the adjust to order in used been has education and discipline historical her, to According pre historiography. official of part a Stojanovi become and discourse historical the enter however, objective an from far is which past, own their

in CentralEuropein after1989, Aviezer Tucker, in1941 History Textbooksin Serbia DubravkaStojanovi AnthonySmith, Culture, Vol.No.½ 4, TodorKulji 7 Ibid, 5 Ibid, - military training than a a than training military ves appropriate, an although in historical realistic, context not n cpbe f eiig n ipoig itself improving and revising of capable ine History and historiography as disciplines are subjects to constant revisions and, as as and, revisions constant to subjects are disciplines as historiography and History According to Kulji to According

24 ć H as dsigihs h reaiain f at s mto n historiography in method a as facts of reexamination the distinguishes also He .

23 claims that the historical discipline and education has had a function of a rather rather a of function a had has education and discipline historical the that claims . ć

“Revised History and New Identity in“Revised IdentityNewand Europe”, History Eastern Myths and Memories of the NationMemoriesthe and of Myths “Historiographicandin Revision Revisionism”, ć , (2005):64 " Revizijau 1941 Udţb Revizije:

, who uses the term "historical revisionism", which is the term I term the is which revisionism", "historical term the uses who , ed. Michal ed. Kopecek(B

icpie f rtcl hnig n h Srin experience. Serbian the in thinking critical of discipline rrow sense of the word means not merely reinterpreting and reinterpreting merely not means word the of sense rrow ),

157

14 (Oxford: OxfordUniversity(Oxford:16 1999), Press, udapest: Central 1 udapest: University 2008), European Press,

enicima Istorije u Srbiji”u ( Istorije enicima nlss y rfsinl historians professional by analysis 21 . Tucker defines this as "revised "revised as this defines Tucker . Past in the Making:Historicalthe RevisionismPast in Journal Politics,Genderfor and ociety is based on the strive of of strive the on based is ociety 20 .

RevisionRevision:ofthe which , among , is a is

22 19

dynamic dynamic . Tucker . . It can, can, It . - respect respect

other other

CEU eTD Collection 27 26 25 became later it but descendants their or war the after or Yugoslavia fled end who the those at by written works the in diaspora, in started tendency this Croatia, and Serbia both In general. relativization and and justification of subject the became Croatia Serbia in Chetniks as regime Yugoslav the by traitors and collaborators eighties pres more became but seventies, the of beginning the since crisis in been had projects its and historiographyYugoslav common it, on attacks to also but history, of RevisionisminSe 1.3. Historical by motivated also is ideologicalpolitical purposesand ofcreating history. national but policies historical Yugoslav the of revision objective an not is revis "historical term war. The the during Chetniks the by committed crimes the neglects or forgets remembrance of culture official Serbian the Yugoslav regime, founded newly the of policies and executions crimes, Yugoslavthe as his same WorldThe Serbia. War in to revived nationalism connected is century twentieth the of end the at fascism of criticism the of weakening th and crimes their and protagonists historical condemned massively of interpretations objectives i which revision, and

Ibid, 64 Ibid, Ibid, 21 Ibid, in10 Human2002), Serbia,Rights HistoriographyLiteratureand SFRY Dissolutionof on TodorKulji Although Tito's death opened the doors not only to questioning and revising this part part this revising and questioning to only not doors the opened death Tito'sAlthough Secondthe on remembrance of culturecurrent the of aspect important Forgetting an is 27 as judged been had which War, World Second the of forces military The . 25 . He argues that historical revisionism attracts the most attention with different with attention most the attracts revisionism historical that argues He . ć , “HistoriographicRev 26 s motivated by the clear or hidden intentions of justification of political political of justification of intentions hidden or clear the by motivated s .

ionism" is chosen in this thesis in the case of Serbia of case the in thesis this in chosen is ionism"

isionisminPost rbia

15 - socialistinRegimes”,

, HelsinkiFiles , 11for (Belgrade: HelsinkiCommittee torical policy was forgetting the post the forgetting was policy torical byh

Balkans Rachomon: Rachomon: Balkans istorians

ent in Serbia in the in Serbia in ent and intellectuals in in intellectuals and Ustasha because it because at the at - war war

in in

CEU eTD Collection 30 29 28 as considered is it because is interpretation new of subject a been WorldWar has Second the why reason The time. the at Serbia in climate anticommunist the as communism, from Serbia of liberators them make to supposed was which past, communist the with cut clear after power to came which regime th of reinterpretation and wave revisionist the bringing and project nationalist Serbian the of reaffirmation for conditions 5 the of interpretation culture official and legislation textbooks, the in present and state the policy historicalofficial of the of part a became revisionism historical elab further which revisionists, future the for map road a created it because significant is book concept ideological new a into facts known incorporated repression from Bešlin people Serbian the of protection and compromises anticommunist of because occupation with collaborated Chetniks the thatargument the on based is antifascism 1985. in published Drama, Veselinwas Chetniks the WorldWar Second and ofthe discourse academic part a a

SANU, Narodna Knjiga, 1985), 191 SANU,Knjiga,Narodna1985), Veselin Ibid, 96 Ibid, Serbia Srbiji”( Milivoj orated, reproduced built on and

argues book this that It was not until the fall of fall the until It not was the on perspective new a introduced Yugoslavin which work firsthistoriography The ) , 90 ,

Đ The Chetnik Movement ofTheDragoljub ChetnikMovement Mihailov Bešlin ureti

ć , " , Četnički Pokret Draţe Mihailovića:Najfrekventniji IstorijskogČetničkiPokret RevizionizmaObjekat u JugoslovenskaSaveznicii Ra Milošević th

of October as a turning point of throwing down communism created created communism down throwing of point turning a as October of

did not introduce significant new significant introduce orresearch not methods,did facts it but

Đuretić' e Chetnik movement to the peak the to movement Chetnik e

was referred to as the last Europ last the as to referred was - Milošević 193;176 mong intellectuals these in countries as well. Đuretić's Milošević s

tna Drama thesis of two antifascist movements and Chetnik Chetnik and movements antifascist two of thesis

and the government change in Serbia in 2000 that 2000that in Serbia change government in the and

theses 16

in Serbia in 2000 had a key goal of making a a making of goal key a had 2000 in Serbia in

ić:FrequentSubject Revisionism to Thein Most f remembrance. of

Đuretić's (The Alliesand YugoslavWar (Belgrade:Drama), 29 .

–

The Allies and the Yugoslav the War and Allies The

rising Serbian nationalism. This nationalism. Serbian rising 30 ean communist and it suited suited it and communist ean . Stojanovi . a place a Bešlin

xlis ht the that explains of “ the mythical mythical the “ of ć

claims that the that claims

28 . CEU eTD Collection 32 31 nation new strengtheningthe to order in pre it, the with construct discontinuity clear a for strives period Yugoslav the of revision the w Yugoslav common is the past of revision the that recognizes He media. and discourse public post the in noticed be can past distant occupationtowards the had movements these stance the on as much so differences ideological their on based not Partis the between clashes constant the of because war, civil a of characteristics had also it but occupation, against fight the and liberation the on focused primarily war the that is argument His revolution. socialist a as and war civil and liberation Veselin by works Đ the since eighties the in appeared Chetniks and Partisans the between countr the of liberation the and Partisans the on only is accent war, the liberation Yugoslavia. a only As untackled. victimi the and destiny historical of myths the Worldrevisited, War Second was the However,although remembrance. of culture buildingnew of a service the in were followed which books text and names street memorials, regime” communist the of birth

hat all former Yugoslav states have in common, although at different levels. The purpose of purpose levels.different The formerat althoughYugoslavall common, hat in have states ureti Neznanje,Upotreba Zloupotrebai Istorije DubravkaStojanovi Today Character of TheWar in Yugoslavia1941 Ranko History ć Končar Kamberovi

) and Branko Petranovi Branko and , (Novi Sad:, Associationofthe of7,13 AntifascistsSerbia, 2012), Končar ) , ed. ed. Vojin , Dimitrijevi y which was present in Yugoslav historiography. The interpretation as a civil war civil a as interpretation Yugoslav historiography.The in present was which y

, argues that there are different interpretations of the Second World War in in War World Second the of interpretations different are there that argues “ Nekoliko Zapaţanja o Karakteru Rata u Jugoslavijiu Karakteru Zapaţanja Rata Nekoliko o 1941 - uolv eid n bte ve ad id h historica the find and view better a in period Yugoslav ć ć

, argues that all existing models of the revisionism of the recent and and recent the of revisionism the of models existing all that argues “ U Ogledalu Drugih”OgledaluU ( 32 .

- (Belgrade: Belgrade Center for HumanforCenter17 2010), Belgrade (Belgrade: Rights, states and the ideologies in power in them. Kamberovithem. power in ideologiesin theand states

ć . Finally, the Second World War can be interpreted as both as interpreted be World Warcan Second Finally,the . 31 Te changes The . zation of the Serbian nation from the nineties remained remained nineties the from nation Serbian the of zation -

1945 (Newsfrom Past:the - Yugoslav space, which are present in historiography, in present are which Yugoslav space, In the MirrorInthe “Otherofthe )

in Antifašizam Juče i Danas Jučei Antifašizam 17

f fiil oias lw, monuments, laws, holidays, official of Knowing, Not K Knowing, Not ans and the Chetniks, which is is which Chetniks, the and ans ”), -

1945” ( 1945”

( NovostiProšlosti:iz Znanje, Antifascism Yesterdayand nowing,Useand Abuseof SomeRemarksthe on

agmns for arguments l ć

stresses

a CEU eTD Collection 37 36 35 34 the of 33 foundation the was War World Second the that is reevaluation of subject the are new ofthe aspects nation only in Yugoslavia of Chetniksquislings ha the also like the of normalization the that out points He Yugoslavia's disintegration. of out came which nation the of foundations the strengthening of service the in is republics Yugoslav Kamberovi post the in sentenced or Partisans the by killed were whovictimization ofcollaborators the normalizing quislingsand movement, of the antifascist Liberatio People's the of denial and relativization a socialism, post of achievements the ignoring periods dark anticommunist and newly the by accepted became and public in openly of Yugoslaviadissolution the after starte revisionism appeared that is the Arts and and Sciences Debate for Academy Linguistic Serbian the the of Spring, Memorandum Croatian the of part were which controversies Yugoslavia of disintegration the before much to back Yugoslavia former the historiographythat has gone Croatia furthest and that the in process Serbia in

( HistoriographyIdeol and HusnijaKamberovi Ibid, 262 Ibid, MilanRadanovi Ibid TodorKuljic, Revisionin of The Past Former Yugoslavia

Radanovi Kulji Milosavljevi

ć h as rcgie ta rwiig h rewriting that recognizes also he , ć of history

tracks the beginning of this process of "ideological historical revisionism" in in revisionism" historical "ideological of process this of beginning the tracks “HistoriographicinRevisionismPost ć ć ,

“ dniis h mi caatrsis f itrcl eiins i Sri as Serbia in revisionism historical of characteristics main the identifies Istorijska Politika u Srbiji posle 2000” ( Srbiji2000”Politika Istorijskau posle ć - ć , totalitarian rhetoric, rhetoric, totalitarian as ofrevisionism, mask is used part as a a to the hide

“ explains that the reason the Second World Second the reason Warthe the Yugoslavthat and explains period IzmeĎu Kritičke Istoriografije i Ideološkog Revizionizma”Kritičke iIstoriografije IzmeĎu Ideološkog (

in an attempt to norm to attempt an in negative a ogical Revisionismogical

- states

37 .

s a purpose of national reconciliation representation the s purposeofnational and a ih sol la t nraiain f h mn negative many the of normalization to lead should light - a Ygsa hsoigah, h dmnzto of demonization the historiography, Yugoslav war ) ) , , in ,

ed. ed. VeraHistory,Katz, for(Sarajevo:Institute 122007), Revizija ProšlostiRevizija Prostorimana JugoslavijeBivše alize and and alize justify it 18 - socialistRegimes”,21

istory in Serbia and some other former former other some and Serbia in istory Historicalin2000 Policy afer Serbia - - one nation founded a trials war 35 .

34 36 Yugoslav the and Army n . The only change which which change only The . Smlry o Kulji to Similarly . d to manifest itself more itselfmore manifest to d - tts srn anti strong A states. Between CriticalBetween , in the revisionist revisionist the in , 33 . )

,260

ć states states

and - CEU eTD Collection 41 40 39 38 past the on perspective revisionist the approve Serbia memo the offending and denials crime of prevention of instrument an as past the of revisions radical limiting of purpose a Westhas Serbia. in revisionism and politics history restorative ofPolitics1.4. History Legislation Service inthe seriously started level 2000. after Franjo state official the of at tendency this Serbia, time in but strongest, the thewas politics history restorative during nineties the in was it Croatia, In Yugoslavia. crisi and nationalism of rise the to due eighties the in prominent became only they and dissolution the before much started Serbia, and Croatia in primarily republics, new the ignoring be heroes, national fact that they collaborators the were to supposed are which War, World Second the of collaborators the using by FirstWorld War the before Se the in even Yugoslavia and interwar the in before, time the in be for looked should continuity that and artificial were society its and Yugoslavia of state previous th Yugoslav the state of legitimacy

service e Remembrance,Perspectives PerspektivenErinnerungenund TheSecond WorldWar Serbia Srbiji”( Milivoj Ibid,227 Ibid,225 OliveraMilosavljevi Most authors cited in this chapter agree that the revisions of history in the Yugoslav the in history of revisions the that agree chapter this in cited authors Most h lgsain n eeas n lgl rehabilitation legal and veterans on legislation The ), ), The Chetnik Movement ofTheDragoljub ChetnikMovement Mihailović: FrequentSubject Revisionism to Thein Most Bešlin 85

f identity of , " Četnički Pokret Draţe Mihailovića:Najfrekventniji IstorijskogČetničkiPokret RevizionizmaObjekat u ć , ) “ , in ,

Geschichtsrevisionismus undZweite der Geschichtsrevisionismus WeltKrieg” ( politics, that is supposed to offer arguments which prove that the the that prove which arguments offer to supposed is that politics,

Mythos Partizan:Mythos (Dis ) , ed. , TomicUnrastal Verlag, Djordje et (Münster: 2013) 39 . The connection between the far past and present is constructed is present and past far the between connection The . (

MythosPartizan.(Dis)Continuities ofthe YugoslavHistory,Left: 38

. She sees the role of history in Serbian society as being in in being as society Serbian in history of role the sees She . ry of war victims, while legislation and courts in in courts and legislation while victims, war of ry - )Kontinuitäten derjugoslawischen )Kontinuitäten Linken:Geschichte, 19

41 Bešlin . The laws adopted by the National National the by adopted laws The . 40

is an important aspect of the the of aspect important an is

rus ht eilto i the in legislation that argues HistoricalandRevisionism , 227 , s of the regime in regime the of s

rbian kingdom rbian TuĎman , that that , CEU eTD Collection 42 the of adoption the of daythe until 1941 from 6 starting reasonsAprilideological or political of or administrativedecision, because court the or with withoutrights, other or freedom lives, fighting Partisans. the against and occupiers the with collaborating continued others war,while liberation the joined indeed the invited Petar King after that especially participated really someone if determine to procedures any specify not does law the that is problem Another 1943. from Allies the of long no were Chetniks the although 1945, to 1941 from period the of now warbut including Chetniks.liberation the w War", Liberation "People's term the Yugoslavuseslaw veterans. The Partisan the to as rights same the them grants status This 15 May until 1941 a Homeland Yugoslavthe of the members in Army "the that defines law the act second the Incountry. the of liberation the for wars earlier and WarLiberation People's the from veterans the of rights the of fulfillment 2004 the for conditions in Families their of Members and Invalids Military Veterans, Rehabilitation the 2004 and Act of2006and 2011. Veter of Rights the on Law the of change World Second the War the are concerning Serbia of Republic the of Assembly

(Belgrade: andInvalids MembersMilitarytheirFamilies of Zakon When talking about the Chetniks, the law encompasses all members of this movementthis of members all encompasses law the Chetniks,the about talking When of Rights the on Law the of change a adopted Assembly National Serbian The The Rehabilitation Act of 2006 defines "the rehabilitation of the people who lost lost who people the of rehabilitation "the defines 2006 Rehabilitationof Act The o Pravimao Boraca, Vojnih ČlanovaInvalidai Porodica Njihovih Sluţbeni th

Glasnik, 2004), Glasnik, 2 Act

1945 have the status of the veterans of the People's Liberation War Liberation People's the of veterans the of status the have 1945

ans, Military Invalids and Members of their Families adopted in in adopted Families their of Members and Invalids Military ans,

ih sd o ecie xlsvl te atsn ad their and Partisans the exclusively describe to used hich

in the in ) ,

Sluţbeni htis o on h Partisans, the join to Chetniks 20

liberation war. This issue is very important, important, very is issue This war. liberation

nd Ravna Gora Movement from April 1th 1th from April Movement Gora Ravna nd

Glasnik Republike Srbije, No. 137/2004 GlasnikNo. RepublikeSrbije, ( Law on the Rights of LawRights the on Veterans, er officially on the side the on officially er wih eie the defines which , many

members their 42 . CEU eTD Collection 46 45 44 43 fact that the the peoplealso proposedforrehabilitation are nolonger alive. and witnesses contemporary of lack the of because questioned be can which rehabilitation, the in used are WorldWar Second the during people the of actions some behind reasons and intentions of interpretations the example, from this protected in As and destruction. neutral stayed Yugoslavia that sure make to and people Serbian the tryi just was he that argument the with 2009 in rehabilitated was 1941, in Pact 2009 Cvetkovi and 2006 between only rehabilitated were people 1300 Nedi Milan for requests rehabilitation to rehabilitated onretribution no law peoplethe adopted Rehabilitationafter the Act. law" special a by defined be will people rehabilitated the of property confiscated regaining and retribution on right "the that stating either, retribution specify not Partisa by the killed were who people for requests file to possible it makes decision, administrative an without killed or sentenced were who people the Worldof rehabilitationthe of definitionWar the and f time the encompasses law the Also, forces. Italian or German the of side the on fought or crimes war committed person the if who and can who addressingwithout procedure rehabilitation the o Republic of territorythe in residence had who and law

Belgrade in March 2014 because the request andBelgradecomplete.inbecause it not Marchtheattached2014 wererequest to the documents The rehabilitationofMilan Nedi inrehabilitation iscase started casecourt whichthethe of Dragoljub Mihailovi becausecontroversial prominentmostpeopleThese probablyfromarethe World Secondthe War in Serbiaperiod are which Ibid, 8 Act Sluţbeni Rehabilitaco Zakon http://www.vreme.com/cms/view.php?id=862140 Tatjana Tagirov," started.has not process for rehabilitationrequest ofDimitrijeLjoti huad o rqet wr fld ih atr h lw a aotd icuig the including adopted, was law the after right filed were requests of Thousands ć

, Glasnik, 2006), 2006), Glasnik, 1 Act the

Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia who had signed the Tripartite the signed had Yugoslaviawho of Kingdom the of Minister Prime RehabilitacijaSrbiji”( u iji ( iji ns while fighting against them. The law is a two a is law The them. fighting against while ns oftheircollaboration forces.German with Italianand occupying The only

The Rehabilitation Act

ć , the ,

Prime

Mi Rehabilitation inRehabilitation Serbia ć nister innister occupiedwasSerbia,rejected , the leaderquislingofthe theZbor, movement , was filed but the o 14, hc icue te eid f h Second the of period the includes which 1941, rom ć Dmtie Ljoti Dimitrije , ) , Sluţbeni , last accessed last 2013 November on , 17, 21

Glasnik Republike Srbije, No. 33/2006, (Belgrade:33/2006, GlasnikNo. RepublikeSrbije, f Serbia" f ć ) ,

Vreme, n Daojb Mihailovi Dragoljub and

43 955 (April955 2009), cannot 46 . The law further specifies further law The . - . For example, example, For . ć

page document and does and document page . The request for . Therequest court in order to justify to order in court 44

by Highinthe Court . However, there However, .

be rehabilitated and rehabilitated be

ng to protect protect to ng

ć Dragiša 45 , and and ,

was

CEU eTD Collection 48 47 a reasons ideological or political of because persecuted or killed sentenced, people the all for rehabilitation possible the that except anything defining not and war,aftersentenced the not did in but war participate the were and forces occupation Hungarianthe join to forced people were there because Serbia in community Hungarian the of complaints the after included was law the of part This process. re the during crimes war the in participating or committing not were they that the for rehabilitation for the possible makes law Nevertheless, the Commission State the by Determinati and Yugoslavia of Republic People's Federative and Yugoslavia Federative Democratic the of institutions other and courts by Yugoslavia, crime war the in participants or criminals war as sentenced those that states further It or forces. quisling occupation of members as War World Second the in killed were who those including co who formations quisling rehabilitated or familiespeople in their ofdeath ofthethe personconcerned. case Retribut the for Commission freedoms and rights human and state legal a of standards the against was decision administrative or re "political, on persecution for reasons the 6 April the after frame time the define not does 2011rehabilitation.law The of consequences and procedure conditions, the definingin detail

Ibid, 2 Act Sluţbeni Rehabilito Zakon h scn at f h 21 lw eie ta mmes f h ocpto fre or forces occupation the of members that defines law 2011 the of act second The revised was Act Rehabilitation the complaints, many After The Rehabilitation Rehabilitation vagueThe too was which Act law of2011 2006 issues ofthe the solved 47

b ay ors ne cnrl f h Ntoa Cmite f h Lbrto of Liberation the of Committee National the of control under courts any by s Glasnik, 2011),Glasnik, 1 Act A opsd o h 20 lw te 01 a dfns h etbihet f the of establishment the defines law 2011 the law, 2006 the to opposed As .

on of Occupiers Crimes ofthe the be their Helpers and rehabilitated cannot also aciji,( The RehabilitationThe Act

mmitted or participated in the war crimes cannot be rehabilitated, be cannot crimes war the in participated or mmitted

ion and the conditions for returning property and money to the the to money and property returning for conditions the and ion

) , Sluţbeni ligious, national and ideological" and if the court the if and ideological" and national ligious, 22

1941 as the 2006 law did and it expanded it and did law 2006 the as 1941

Glasnik Republike Srbije, No. 92/2011, GlasnikNo. RepublikeSrbije, (Belgrade: crimes. those for those

nd that any person can file can person any that nd

who it can be determined determined be can who it in 2011 and it goes into into goes it and 2011 in

habilitation 48 . CEU eTD Collection politically those of rehabilitation the why is That corrected. then and specified first be to have injustices those and regimes previous the during citizens their to done injustices the warcrimes.who committed Reha the of aspect the tackled has authors these of none justice, transitional of part important very Rehabilitation the of a isofpolitical repression Act.victims ofthe rehabilitation Although the regulati of lack the considers and past authoritarian the overcome to order in necessary is it that arguingSerbia, in rehabilitation on of aspect legal a revisionism restor historical and as it describing possible, quislings and criminals war of rehabilitation the makes which formulation its for Act Rehabilitation the criticize Others significance. its Serbia. Although Re weaknesses ofthe theythe recognize in process rehabilitation the in included be should which retribution economic on legislation the of lack the only criticize and past authoritarian the with terms to coming of way crucial t see adopted was law the before legislation rehabilitation the for hoping been 1.5.aboutTheDebate Rehabilitation 2006 law, re so the the to accordingprocessed be will 2011 beforehave whichstarted already processes and filed requests all that defines also 2011 of Act Rehabilitation the However, filed. been already Mi Dragoljub rehabilitate to impossible it wouldmake it and criminals war sentenced forces and occupation and quisling of members the for requests rehabilitation file to possible not is it law, this With anyone. for request the iiainAt f 06 hc alw te eaiiain f h qilns n te people the and quislings the of rehabilitation the allows which 2006 of Act bilitation There has been a debate about legal rehabilitation in Serbia. Some authors who had had who authors Some Serbia. in rehabilitation legal about debate a been has There In that way, that In legislation the of importance the on accent an puts scholarship Serbian the of part A habilitation issue has not completely been out. sorted Š arki ć

claims that it is a obligation of democratic societies to deal with deal to societies democratic of obligation a is it that claims

ative memorySerbia. in politics ons on the financial retribution as the biggest problem biggest the as retribution financial the on ons hailović and many other people whose requests have requests whose people other many and hailović

habilitation habilitation Act, theyon more focus

e a a a as law he or or CEU eTD Collection 51 50 49 an as Rehabilitation Act the considers he authors, other the as same The cases. rehabilitation been has law the success that relatively argues implemented also he However, denationalization. and service secret the of archives the of opening about laws additional the of lack the as such issues technical writ not was law the that admits also Trkulja complete regime the of victims the of rehabilitation the make would which on retribution, measures legal of lack the is law the of problem only the that argues he taFurthermore, which War World Second the since law first the is it as building, democracy He and reconciliation national the requests. for foundation a as the law this considers of processing on work their improving are courts the beginning, the in impleme the in issues were there Althoughimplemented. successfully been has it and adopted was it that is thing important the weaknesses, its has Act Rehabilitation the although that Lazarevargues implementation. successful and importance its emphasizing out violent point a and to criminaland character of regimethe non the regime. process ofpolitical should normalization delegitimizeThe a ofrehabilitation violence of consequences the and past violent the with society Jugovi society Serbian the for importance great a has sentenced ideologically

Hereticus,ofPast:JournalReexamination the Controversiesfor inRehabilitationSerbia,the about zrtava AdvancedLegal Studies, 2008), the of Past:Reexamination MoralRehabilitationofSignificancethe ofthe VictimsofPolitical Repression osudenika 2. 2004), Hereticus,Journ about rehabilitationthe about requests. judgeisinLazareva Regional the %E2%80%93 for(Belgrade: Center AdvancedLegal Studies, 2008) AleksandarJugovi Gojko Lazarev,Gojko Nebojša ć The other authors focus on the shortcomings of the Rehabilitation Act, while while Act, Rehabilitation the of shortcomings the on focus authors other The

- politicke considers this law equally important for the moral and legal confrontation of a a of confrontation legal and moral the for important equally law this considers

Š http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/2004 - arki i - kaznjenika.html - ć dve - ,

represije.html#more “ al for Reexamination ofPastReexamination the al for “ Zakon o Rehabilitaciji: o Kasnije” Zakon GodineDve( Potreba Donošenja Zakona o Rehabilitaciji”Donošenja o Potreba Zakona ( - ć godine ,

“ Dru -

štveniRehabilitacijeiZnačajMoralniŢrtavaPoltičke ( Represije” kasnije.html

ControversiesSer in Rehabilitationthe about , lastaccessed on , April2014 28,

http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/drustveni

Court in fastestisdecidingmostlywhichand Court Sabac, court a positively fully which is proved by the hundreds of successful successful of hundreds the by proved is which fully - 627 , lastaccessed on , April2014 28, , lastaccessed , on April2014 28, - 2/potreba , 2/2004, (Belgrade: for, 2/2004, Center AdvancedLegal Studies, 24 and legal many are there that and well very ten http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/zakon

- donosenja

Need to PassLawNeedato on TheRehabilitation Act: Two Year After - zako ke te rms f h victors. the of crimes the ckles 50

. bia

na - i - - ,(Belgrade:2/2008, for Center moralni o - - ) democrati rehabilitaciji , Hereticus,Journalfor 49 . Similarly to to Similarly . - znacaj Rehabilitation). ntation of the law law the of ntation authoritarian c - - - politickih rehabilitacije Socialand o - rehabilitaciji 2/2008, Š - arki

) , - 51 ć - . , CEU eTD Collection 54 53 52 alsothem possible of rehabilitation the make would reasons ideological and political of criteria on only based Serbi in Act Rehabilitation the as such law A terms. political and ideological in opposed people the by executed or sentenced were forces and regimes socialist those very finds Sekulovic post which other of example motives, an gives He ideological problematic. or political on based was sentence mo make to law the for order in crimes, commit not did question in person the that added condition a be war trials either were who but crimes many committed WorldSecond the in occupation the collaborationwith in War participated who people and of rehabilitation the for filed were requests many that possible it makes formulated is wayit the sentenced was someone which for reasons ideological and political the except lot a specify not does law the of formulation the that is authors following the of critiques prominent most the of way.One detailed more a in in step important coming terms to past authoritarian with

Revisionism inRevisionism Serbia (2004 Paradigma Primenakao RevizionizmaSrbiji”Istorijskog u ( proslosti.html Studies,2008), Past:Controversies inRehabilitationthe Serbia, about MeasureofLegalofathe Overcoming (NoviSad: Associationofthe 135 2012), ofAntifascistsSerbia, Rehabilitationofthe of Associationof 157 Antifascists of2012), Serbia, AleksandarSekulovi MilanRadanovi Jovica Trkulja, in France, Norway or Netherlands, where the people involved in fascist and national national and fascist in involved people the where Netherlands, or Norway France, in Sekulovi weaknesses other identified have authors Several - 2011)in t Servicethe of 53 .

e es. ihu ta, h lw s oue ol o te usin f someone's if question the on only focused is law the that, Without sense. re , lastaccess , ć “ http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/rehabilitacija ć Rehabilitacija kao MeraPravnog Rehabilitacija kao Savladavanja AutoritativneProšlosti”(

, also questions the way in which the law is written, is written, waylaw arguing the questions also which should there in that 54 “ Zakonodavna PolitikaZakonodavna VladeRepublikei SluţbiSrbijeu RevizijeProšlosti Njena . ć )

, , in , “ Draţa Pravni ed on ed April2014 28,

Antifašizam Juče i DanasJučei (Antifascism Antifašizam

Mihailovi he Revision of the Past and itsheand RevisionImplementationPast of the Paradigmasaof Historical

iDrugi AspektiMihailovića”DraţeRehabilitacije (

or killed. This is what Radanovi what is This killed. or AuthoritarianPast ć) , in , Antifašizam Juče i Danas(Antifascism Jučei Antifašizam

25 killed by the Partisans or sentenced at the post the at sentenced or Partisans the by killed

2/2008 for(Belgrade: Center AdvancedLegal - a til sc a h Nrmeg ras or trials Nuremberg the as such trials war ) , Hereticus,ofJournalReexamination the for LegislativeRepublicthe Policy of ofSerbia - kao

of the Rehabilitation Act from 2006 from Rehabilitation Act the of Yesterdayand Toda - . mera

- pravnog ć -

savladavanja criticizes, arguing that that arguing criticizes, Legal Other and Aspects

Yesterdayand Today y),

(NoviSad: Rehabilitationasa

to them also them to - autoritarne wih is which a ) -

- CEU eTD Collection 57 56 55 2011taking the law notice the into if and arguments authors ofthe would change. onrehabilitation wouldwith continue debate how laws. It see both the to interesting would be an law 2006 the with only theyengage so adopted, was law 2011 the before written were works these of All issue. important most the as criminals war and collaborators rehabilitating of possibility the see and Left the from come adoption Rehabil the criticize who those side, other the On practice. the in overcome be could shortcomingswhose past, totalitarian overcomingthe way of and justice transitional a as also and revision and ofhistory asmistakes correction oflegal removal not from p and the represented they which politics national and ideologies of legitimization rehabilitation the on decisions rehabilitation to possible it makes it but trials, led rehabi state no were there when time war the includes to back goes it that is law the of problem another that le fair and rights human the to according court, other some in way same the in sentenced anyway be would person a if determining of aspect important an misses law The rehabilitated. be not could and could non are rehabilitation for criteria

Belgrade:for Center AdvancedLegal Studies:45 Act Public Reactions, DragoljubMihailovićPoliticalasa Trial VesnaRaki Vlad Ibi d, 45 d, litate people whokilled were the by form whostate Partisans not poweryet did the – Raki Vodnelirehabilitation, the of supporter a Although imir Vodneli

h spotr o rhbltto se h 20 Rhbltto At s to of tool a as Act Rehabilitation 2006 the see rehabilitation of supporters The Sad StorySad Possiblea with EndHappy

ć ć -

- Vodneli n eba s ecie a a ielgcl n nt lgl esr ad cour and measure legal a not and ideological an as perceived is Serbia in Vodneli ć (Belgrade: Assoc , “ Zakon o Rehabilitaciji: Zakono TuţnaPriča SrećnimKrajem”sa Moţda ( ć , ć

“ Rehabilitacija Dragoljuba MihailovićaPolitičko SuĎenje” Rehabilitacija Dragoljuba kao ( ok a te ie cnet n srse ta te rbe is problem the that stresses and context wider the at looks gislation and court process court and gislation

iationofthe 119Antifascists of2013), Serbia, - specif f political of ) , in , ) , ic enough and the law does not clearly identify who who identify clearly not does law the and enough ic Ne Rehabilitaciji: JavnaNo Reagovanja” NeRehabilitaciji: Hereticus,ofPastJournalReexamination the for

convicts are represented and seen as a a as seen and represented are convicts 55 . He goes further in the critique, arguing critique, the in further goes He . d there have been no works analysing analysing works no been have there d 6 th ć

April also expresses criticism that the the that criticism expresses also

1941, which means that it it that means which 1941,

TheRehabilitation

to theto Rehabilitation: itation Act and its its itation and Act Rehabilitationof ast

, , VI,2/2008, 57 .

56 that .

t CEU eTD Collection Dragol of some up bring also but rehabilitation case thein research, issuesthe and courtroom thehistory about observationsin important this for context provide and to relate only not works testimonie the and 1946 in trial Mihailovi of responsibilitycommand the of issue the Homeland, Yugoslav the in Army Duli by MihailoviDragoljub of rehabilitation official commissions forinvestigations circumstances ofthe ofthe death ofMihailovi state and textbooks writing War,WorldSecond the with dealing processes legislative the in participated have they and Mihailovi of rehabilitation the of supporters been have historians These moment. pr the why reason the is which proceedings, the during facts historical Dimitrijevi Bojan historians, two the against charge a filed Serbia of Antifascists of Association the and Black Womenin Rights, has been considered case problematic the civilsociety.in Helsinki Committee for The Huma of objectivity the why is which it, opposing one only and rehabilitation the supporting been proceedingagain after one postponed December. in was it but witnesses, expert as historians more two include to organizations of couple a of requestbecause of theOctober since2013 hold on processwasmanyand protests. media The atten great a active, thebeen Yugoslavwhere had republics Homeland the Armyin ongoing. still is it and Belgrade in 1.6 .Rehabilitation hr wer There Mihailovi Dragoljub of process rehabilitation The

ć hr hv not have There , Sekulovi , u Mihailovi jub e four historians as expert witnesses including three historians who had had who historians three including witnesses expert as historians four e ć

of Dragoljub of Mihailov and Raki and ć

en many been uh s f h rhbltto i jsiid n wud Mihailovi would and justified is rehabilitation the if as such - udd igahe of biographies funded ć - s by the historians in the process of the rehabilitation. Their Their rehabilitation. the of process the in historians the by s Vodneli

ć ć cdmc ok daig ih h cut ae f the of case court the with dealing works academic , as it is rec is it as , t asd ay ecin fo te omr Yugoslav former the from reactions many caused It

ć n Ksa Nikoli Kosta and

deal with the wartime activities and crimes of the the of crimes and activities wartime the with deal 27 i ć

ent and ongoing. The research articles done articles research ongoing.and The ent

Mihailov ć ć

, for giving false testimonies and and testimonies false giving for , started in 2010 at the High Court Court High the at 2010 in started ić

and have been members of of members been have and ocess is on hold at the at hold on is ocess ć tion in the the in tion

for years for ć .

ć ć , the ,

be be n CEU eTD Collection 60 59 trials, 58 the after years 60 than more properly this do not could court the that is problem the that stresses He manipulated. ideologically or politically or wrong was decision court commit question in person a whether determine Sekulovi sources. primary interpreting differently or facts including not or historiography in historical achievements of manipulations and speculations to lead can guilt concerned ofthose investigation ordiscussion the and about trial original of the it secure and manipulation political avoid to legitimacy order in rights, human and law of rule the of standards contemporary the violating were 1946 from proceedings the if determining co the today court crimes war any ICTYor Justice, of Court Mihailovi that doubt no is there that have would Mihailovi of rehabilitation the that claiming Act, Rehabilitation 2006 the of weaknesses nineties the in wars the after trials the Second World International Criminal the and through Serbia, in history" "courtroom the with experience previous Duli courtroom. the discussin of issue the and Serbia in legislation and historiography anywaysentenced court. other by some

Mihailovi TomislavDuli Ibid,630 Ibid,644 urt if the law from 2006 is taken literally and that the court is limited only to to only limited is court the that and literally taken is 2006 from law the if urt

One of the problems of “courtroom history” in rehabilitation cases is that a recreation a that is cases rehabilitation in history” “courtroom of problems the of One n o te sus urudn te eaiiain ae i te eain between relation the is cases rehabilitation the surrounding issues the of One ć

ć argues that the court has to go into the reexamination of history in order to to order in history of reexamination the into go to has court the that argues

. been denied if t if denied been in Serbia“.

ć , “ Sentenced "for Political "for IdeologicalSentenced and Reasons"? TheRehabilitationof Dragoljub ć 58

identifies the reasons for dealing with the past through legislation in the the in legislation through past the with dealing reasonsfor the identifies Sociologija We discussing When .

he request had been filed after the law in 2011 was adopted and and adopted was 2011 in law the after filed been had request he

, 54 (4), , (2012):627 ć

would have been found guilty also by the International the by also guiltyfound been have would

Mihailović's

Tribunal 28

ted crimes, so that they can see if the original original the if see can they that so crimes, ted

59 for Former eaiiain ae Duli case, rehabilitation . He points out that it will depend on depend will it that out points He . , which are not based on the the on based not are which ,

Yugoslavia dealing the with g and rewriting history in in history rewriting and g ć

emphasizes Draţa ć

CEU eTD Collection 62 61 the of questioning the possibilities revise to history ofthe examination human norms legal and the to not and rights. to directed is rehabilitation to approach the terms, legal in Thus, trial these conducting were which others the and communist with Kingdom United in Joyce or Norway in Quisling of trial the between difference great only the that concluded post the of comparison a today.Raki questioned being not are decisions court those and countries many in suspected ontrial non put ofcollaboration were people the and of history manipulation a and speculations to lead can trial the recreate to attempt the missingand often are witnesses the because

ValjanostiNjegovuza Postupka ( Rehabilitaciju” DragoljubMihail PublicReactions Rehabilitation: Mihailovićinhis Process ofandtheof Rehabilitation 1946 AleksandarSeku VesnaRaki Another issue is that the post the that is issue Another 61 .

ć - Vodneli ović as a Politicalasa ović Trial lovi ć ć , , “ “ O PravnojO ValjanostiGodineSuĎenja Mihailoviću iPravnoj1946. Draţi o Rehabilitacija Dragoljuba MihailovićaPolitičko SuĎenje” Rehabilitacija Dragoljuba kao (

- Mihailović's war trials in France, United Kingdom, Norwa Kingdom, United France, in trials war no longer alive in most of the cases, the original documentation is is documentation original the cases, the of most in alive longer no

) , (Belgrade: Associationofthe 172 Antifascists of2013), Serbia, ) , 132 ,

- war trials in Yugoslavia were not unique phenom unique not Yugoslavia were in trials war trial in in trial

OnLegalthe Corectnessof the Trial Dragoljub of 29 uolva is Yugoslavia

) , in , NeRehabilita

t claoaos ee not were collaborators to s ht h Ygsa sae was state Yugoslav the that ciji: Javna(No ciji: Reagovanja - y and Yugoslavia and and y communist European European communist ć - Vodneli Rehabilitationof ć

- has done done has 173

enon

to 62

CEU eTD Collection 63 ar there if and necessary, requestingparty. the other institutions if fromor request materials archives also can court The by filed claims and materials the on only based judge one only or commission the to left is party, ora claims state the by oppose represented the to non of use the rehabilitation, r or taking licenses marriage issuing deaths, rights, parenting and ability working and persons missing pronouncing of cases issues, property party rehabilitationthe and requested by judge which commission a ora formed judges. three on but process, court the in sides two no are there that means This proceeding. contentious non was cases rehabilitation in used be would which process court the that decided which few a after months regulated was law the of implementation The court. in and law retribution the of of implementation regulation the notably most issues, important many address to failed 2.1.Rehabilitation inPractice will be practice this in addressed before chapter lookingthe case at ofDragoljub Mihailovi rehabilitation the with case the Mihailovi is which 2006, of law the to according 2011 processed before are 2006law,filed requests the 2011the of annulled law the Although

http://www.vreme.com/cms/view.php?id=862140 Tatjana Tagirov." The Rehabilitatio The 2011. and 2006 of ActsRehabilitation the by defined is Serbia in rehabilitation Legal h non The ć ChapterII.Rehabilitat . This is why the law of 2006, its shortcomings and the issue of rehabilitation in rehabilitation of issue the and shortcomings its 2006, of law the why is This . the law was adopted in 2006 by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Serbia, Serbia, of Republic the of Court Supreme the by 2006 in adopted was law the - contentious proceeding is used in many cases, mostly in cases concerning concerning cases in mostly cases, many in used is proceeding contentious RehabilitacijaSrbiji”( u n Act of 2006 is a document consisting of only nine short acts which which acts short nine only consistingof document a isn 2006 of Act

e no materials or proofs to justify request for rehabilitation, those rehabilitation, for request justify to proofs or materials no e - contentious proceeding means that there cannot be another side,another be cannot there that means proceeding contentious

Rehabilitation inRehabilitation Serbia ion of Dragoljub of ion Mihailovi , last accessed last N on , 30

of the requesting side, so the decision thedecision so requesting side, the of ) , Vreme ovember 17, 2013 ovember 17, etc. , No. 955,23.04.2009, No. , 63

However, in the case of case the However,in

of Dragoljub Dragoljub of ć

eturning ć . ly

CEU eTD Collection 66 65 64 social the and judges certain of mood and will on depending speed, different with and implemented out state budget the evenburden more. would retribution the high, very are Homen by estimated numbers the and property their 500 around Serb of capacity current the and only property taken the to compensate order in euros billion 250 and 110 between need would Serbia that estimated 2011, to 2008 from Justice Ministryof the secretary in state the Homen, Slobodan Serbia. of Republic symbolic, Serbia in rehabilitation legal especially fact that the whenweconsider are people most concerned nolonger alive. makes law 2006 the by defined rehabilitation retributio of lack The it. requesting process of court return another start or they retribution unless property, to right a have will law 2006 the by rehabilitated those whether the As property. filed requests of return and retribution defined which Act Rehabilitation 2011 the of adoption the of time bythe adopted not was which law byanother defined be will retribution which serve identifycould data to event more personand closely” the the with violence or persecution of description “a in hand should rehabilitation requesting

http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.290.html:244125 Commission P. Vasiljevi Ibid accessedon April2014 6, 14.10.2 SrĎan accessedMay2014 on 10,

f 50 euss filed requests 1500 of -

political milieu where the court is working. The courts in Belgrade and and Belgrade in courts The working. is court the where milieu political erbto wud lo ersn a ra fnnil ifcly o h budget the to difficulty financial great a represent also would Retribution th is problem Another There were a little ar little a were There

Cvetkovi 009. ć million , , A.Pali http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Sta )

, before 2011 have been processed according to the 2006 law, it remains unclear unclear remainslaw, it 2006 the to according processed been 2011have before Večernje ć , " I Loš ZakonLoš I Bolji Kakvog”je( Od Ni ć

, " e year per

VladaSpremnaKomisiju”Formira Da ( Novosti,

ound one thousand people rehabilitated between 2006 and 2009 and 2006 between rehabilitated people thousand one ound 65 66

01.09.2009, 01.09.2009, lhuh ay epe etne i te post the in sentenced people many Although . Cvetkovi . e financial aspect of rehabilitation. The law specifies that that specifies law The rehabilitation. of aspect financial e

- da ć

- se xlis ht h rhbltto i differently is rehabilitation the that explains 31 - radi/I

Evenis NoneBadLawthanBetter - losh - - Government Ready to EstablishReadyGovernment to zakon Vlada - - bolji spremna - je - ni --- 64 - od . da

a o ti proe is purpose this for ia - - kakvog.lt.html formira - war years lost lost years war ) , - komisiju Politika Š bc have abac

, last last ,

after n of the the of , , last , , CEU eTD Collection 69 68 67 Stanojevi Dimitrije of rehabilitation of case the in only but year, one was period b years take can for responsible it However, proceeding. is one only after decisions makes which court the that Belgrade,showed rehabilitation, in Court High the of website the at presented cases archives. of different duration the from is issue documents Another requests court the others, in and concerned person the of death proving document one only demands court the cases, some In it. for responsible of 2.1.1.rehabilitationcases Analysis movement, also victims but Chetnik forthe Serb in rehabilitation WorldWar. legal However, Second the in collaboration and crimes war for accused people the of cases the in especially case, every in clear so not are they but reasons, e or convictions whose theapplying in region where judge forresidence a decides faster th case cities other in lower significantly and Belgrade in percent 100 is requests of number the to relation in rehabilitated p 60 almost rehabilitated

thousands who were sentencedwere thousandscourtwho bydecision, or administrative Cvetkovi Ibid Ibid 72 http://www.danas.rs/danasrs/drustvo/dosad_rehabilitovano_2000_nevino_osudjenih.55.html?news_id=2465 000is50 "accordingexecuted unofficialaround the to sources", radi/I a s o ol aot h pol sc a Daojb Mihailovi Dragoljub as such people the about only not is ia

t epe rm ein wee eaiiain s rcse sol sle ht su by issue that solve slowly processed is rehabilitation where regions from people at The rehabilitation processes different rehabilitation are The 1985 to 1945 from Serbia in people convicted of thousands of dozens were There - losh ć

- claimscourtmore peopleweredecision thanwithout there000 that 50 executed plusof dozens zakon etween the request and the court decision. In the cases analyzed, the shortest the analyzed, cases the In decision. court the and request the etween - bolji - je - euin my e osdrd s ae o pltcl r ideological or political on based as considered be may xecutions ni

- ercent of all rehabilitated in Serbia, while the number of those those of number the while Serbia, in rehabilitated all of ercent od - kakvog.lt.html

rehabilitation procedure. The analysis of 10 rehabilitation rehabilitation 10 of analysis The procedure. rehabilitation

; Miliki ; of purely 32 ć 67 depending on the case and the court which is is which court the and case depending onthe

argues numberthe of allthat or convicted politically codn t Cvetkovi to According .

political orideological political trials. http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Sta 68 .

n h mmes f the of members the and Š abac and 45 percent in percent 45 and abac ć , it is a common a is it ,

and the the and - da - se 69 -

CEU eTD Collection 71 the by 70 reasons ideological and political on based been have to decided was family whole the imprison and him of property the take to Yugoslav regime the of decision the so Franz used as manydifferent as nine an archives find and not could court the case, this In state. the by away taken was property his all while years, more three for work to had he where farm a to moved then and family his with 1948 until 1945 from the in imprisoned was who Franz, Nol of case the is Such rehabilitated. also of Frenchthe notmember did Resistance him help a was and WarCivil Spanish the in participated he that and woman Russian a married had and Moscow in school party a to gone had he that were sentence 2 his of prolonging causing in rehabilitated was compromise, seek but Union Soviet with relations the break not should Yugoslavia that meeting party a at opinion the expressed he because Criminal Acts People against the on Law the to according imprisonment work of year one to sentenced was He home. his at Youth Peki Democratic as of Stanojevi Belgrade. in Stanojevi Dimitrije of rehabilitation the is case similar Yugoslavia.Another of Youth Democratic of Association the of member a was he because in rehabilitated was property, of confiscation and 1948 listed below. be will Belgrade in Court High the at completed cases rehabilitation some of examples The years). than more cases two in cases, four in years (three years five to two from vary others

http://www.bg.vi.sud.rs/lt/articles/o Court Decision,296/10,07.02.2012,HighCourt No. Court Decision,35/11,Court No. 24.02.2012.Highin Court Belgrad Emilijan Milan Kalafati Milan Emilijan Peki Borislav writer The Some of the of Some

ethnic Germans imprisoned or persecuted by the Yugoslav regime were were Yugoslav regime the by persecuted or imprisoned Germans ethnic ć

was arrested at age 1 age at arrested was

, after propaganda materials of the Association had been found been had Associationthe of materials propaganda after , ć - ć

, who was sentenced to years of forced work at Goli Otok Otok Goli at work forced of years to sentenced was who , visem and Stateand , who was sentenced to 10 years of work imprisonment in in imprisonment work of years 10 to sentenced was who , - sudu/rehabilitacija.html 70 .

33 6 because he belonged to the same same Association the to belonged he because 6

inBelgrade

71 .

ć e, available e, on:

in February 2012 by the High Court Court High the by 2012 February in

, lastaccessed on , April2014 4, 07 H ws retd n 1948 in arrested was He 2007. y of imprisonment forthe reason 1. h facts The 012. Knićanin

camp

five CEU eTD Collection 73 72 2002.O 2000and in ofBrakovi statues after named been had which schools and streets the while and much changed also This name. his carrying streets and schools many with happened had incident the where Crkva Bela around region the in honor his in statues made Yugoslav state the Yugoslavia and in Hero People's 2001. in Assembly National Serbian the by calendar official the from removed was it WorldWar and Second the after Yugoslav regime Partisan the in Court Regional rehabil the is Serbia 2.1.2.BogdanRehabilitation of 2006law.the 2 the after held often were proceedings the although because cited, cases other for same the is That restitution. for request another file to have would he law, 2006 the by processed was request rehabilitation Court High

Court Decision,113/10,Court No. Highin07.02.2012 Court Belgrade, accessedon April2014 5, http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Drustvo/Zandarmi PoliceOfficers fromBelaCrkva VictimsIdeological of Terror decisionin:The court quoted Miroljub Mijuskovi shot the victims of persecution and violence because of the political and and political the of because violence and persecution reasonsideological affecting right their live to of victims the shot occu German the against uprising Brakovi Jovanovi shot "The 7 in attention of lot a attracted and significance symbolical a had which case first The th

of July was pronounced as the Day of Uprising of the People of Serbia by the the by Serbia of People the of Uprising of Day the as pronounced was July of 72 Ţ . Franz wrote in his request that that request his in wrote Franz .

ikica ikica Jovanovi ć ć

in Bela Crkva on the 7 the on Crkva Bela in s from the gun of a brand "Steier", with which the communist the which with "Steier", brand a of gun the from s

Š ć aa kle plc sren Bogdan sergeant police killed panac Š

and and abac in 2008. They were police officers in the occupied Serbia, killed by killed Serbia, occupied the in officers police were They2008. in abac n the statue ofBrakovi statue n the tto o Bogdan of itation 011 law was adopted, the requests had been filed during the validity of of validity the during filed been had requests the adopted, was law 011 Lončar

panac onthe 7 panac were set up in the yard of the Orthodox Church in BelaCrkva in OrthodoxChurch theyard of the up in set were Lončar before the official rehabilitation of rehabilitation official the before th pation. The members of the Partisan movement Partisan the of members The pation.

Lončar of Jul 1941, did not mark the beginning of the of beginning the mark not did 1941, Jul of

ć - andMilenko Brakovi ć

iz it is written "so that it never happens again that a a never again that "so happens it is written that it , " 34 - th Bele he also expected his property back, but as his his as but back, property his expected also he Ţandarmiiz BeleIdeološkog ŢrtveCrkve Terora”(

Ţ of July decided 1941. court that The

n Mlno Brakovi Milenko and kc Jovanovi ikica - Crkve 73 ". ) ,

- Politik zrtve

Lončar - ideoloshkog a , 05.01.2009, ,

ć n croa Milenko corporal and Š Š ć panac got new names, the the names, new got panac

aa hd h tte f a of title the had panac ć - , rehabilitated by the the by rehabilitated , Lončar terora.lt.html

and Brakovi and Ţ ikica , last ,

The ć

CEU eTD Collection 76 75 74 them Cvetkovi killing and guns their firing by it to reacted Partisans the and first arms their out took officerspolice the that state clearly time the from documents discu and research the in missed media and court the What Serbia. occupied in gatherings public banning on law German the to according was which village, the in gathering the prevent to wanted officers the incident, the of day Heofficers did. police two waythe same theas occupation, the of service the in themselves put authorities Serbian the and alreadymonths three for occupation historian The well. as Stankovi support and critiques many faced occupation of service q be could Uprising statement a made forthe media: he decision, court the after month One case. rehabilitation this Lazarev,chargeof in was who ex "SerbsSerbs" also killingwas warand the narrative civil of the Serb" a Serb kills

07.01.2009. 07.01.2009. A.Deli antifaizma.html Deletingof Antifascism " 2014 http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/ostali ĐorĎe neduznog Da seDa oralmost norole it" in small a had Germans the that is ironyYugoslav the The by communists. replaced were o an years,four next the During reasons. political and ideological for movement Partisan the of members the by murdered were corporalsystemcompletely. changingthe the of goaland sergeant clear The war civil the of beginning Ufruaey a eb ild Sr o te 7 the on Serb a killed Serb a "Unfortunately,

lhuh h Ygsa saes hie f h 7 the of choice state’s Yugoslav the Although by uprising Serbian the of beginning the of narrative the of replacement a of idea The

Stankovi ć više ć ć , " , argues that the rehabilitation represents a new view on the historical events which which events historical the on view new a represents rehabilitation the that argues , explained that there is no doubt that on that day, Serbia had been under German German under been had Serbia day, that on that doubt no is there that explained - coveka Španac Pucao u NeduţnogČoveka”u ŠpanacPucao (

nikad ne dogodi da Srbin ubije Srbina", MilanneSrbinda nikad dogodi ubije Srbina", Radanovi http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/reportaze/aktuelno.293.html:229557 ć lastaccessed on , April2014 6, , " 74 , lastaccessed , on April2014 6, ZemljaMrtvaca”( Nesrećnih .

etoe, h rhbltto o to oie fies h wr i the in were who officers police two of rehabilitation the uestioned, ) , E

- Novine

, 7.7.2012, , - komentari/Zemlja in Serbia. It was an uprising against the state with a a with state the against uprising an was It Serbia. in 75 .

http://www.e

Spanac Shot anMan SpanacShot Innocent The Land of the Un theThe Land of

35 verturn took place. The Serbian royalists Serbian Theplace. took verturn

- nesrecnih ssions is the fact that all witnesses and and witnesses all that fact the is ssions - novine. th th -

mrtvaca.lt.html

of July to be the official Day of of Day official the be to July of f uy wih akd the marked which July, of com/drustvo/67670 happyDead ć , " Sudsko Brisanje Sudsko ( Antifašizma” 76 Aohr historian, Another . pressed by the judgebyGojko pressed the further explains that on theon that explains further ) , ) Većernje , , lastaccessed on , April 6, Politika - Spanac - Sudsko

Novosti , 21.02. 2009,, - pucao - brisanje , - ĐorĎe u SrĎan --- Court -

CEU eTD Collection 78 77 historians where case rehabilitation substitute and events the of first interpretation an offer to order in witnesses expert as participated the was it because important was case court auth the of overcoming serves which events historical the on view objective an is it that argues side other the and revisionism historical is it that claims side Secondthefrom peopleother andWorldeventsdebates on the in as Warone Serbia, where in the of foundations the of Yugoslavw the same in contested narratives.case isrehabilitation its and the Third, regime one been had which day the reevaluated officially it because rehab this Second, Jovanovi of glorification Yugoslav the and statues the by way positive a in commemorated i years 60 after calendar 7 the on remembrance of culture changed already of epilogue formal a represented rehabilitation legal the First,reasons. main full a democratization of ofSerbiamodernization and way the in stands still which heritage, totalitarian its facing society Serbian the stil are which divisions ideological the with terms to coming and reconciliation national of process of killing heroic act anymorerepresenting a not demystified, now was officers two the of murder the and influenced, ideologically not is

http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.293.html:229712 I. April2014 6, NIN Nikoli Kosta 2014 Mićev , No.3028, Belgrade:No.3028, , 08.01.2009, l strong. He explains that their rehabilitation represents an important contribution to contribution important an represents rehabilitation their that explains He strong. l

h rhbltto o Bogd of rehabilitation The Kosta Nikoli ć ić

Lončar Š , " panac and his act of killing them was demystified years before the rehabilitation. the before years demystified was them killing of act his and panac I Heroj iHeroj I Terorista”( ć

, " Uloga Seoskog Seoskog VašaraUloga Srpskoju Istoriji”(

and Brakovi and ilitation case reflects the tendency of the delegitimization of Yugoslavia,of delegitimization the of tendency the reflects case ilitation ć , an expe , an

n 2001. The police officers in question had been already already been had question in officers police The 2001. n

Both HeroBoth and a Terrorist ć rt that celebrating case, witnessstated rehabilitation ofthis the

caused long term negative consequences and and consequences negative term long caused 77 http:// an an . th

f uy 91 wih a rmvd rm h official the from removed was which 1941, July of Lončar www.nin.co.rs/pages/article.php?id=42180 78 36

. n Mlno Brakovi Milenko and

TheRoleofa VillageinFaire Serbian History ) , Večernje - I - heroj

Novosti - i - te rorista oritarian past. Finally, past. this oritarian , 09.01.2009, , ć

, s infcn fr four for significant is l ast accessed on ast April 7, , lastaccessed on , prevented the prevented Ţ ikica ikica ) , ay

CEU eTD Collection Li People's Ivanovi court Aleksandar the case, this of in head council The appeal. to right a or representative legal his with communication be had decision Kosta by followed request, rehabilitation Mihailović’s the started. trial until Mihailovi that claiming Mihailovi sentenced which 1946 of decision court the of annulment the requested an Regime Communist of Victims and Convicts of Political Association the Homeland, the in Army Yugoslav the of Members the of Association grandsonVojislav Mihailovi 2.2.1.Thefirs case thein ofcontestation.court context the put to order in analyzed be will which region, and Serbia in reactions negative of lot a processcaused court The case. rehabilitation this concerningissues main the analyze to order witn the by made been have which statements the and proceedings the of overview Brakovi 2.2.Rehabilitation of witnesses.direct h rqet o te eaiiain f rglu Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the for request The Mihailovi Dragoljub of case rehabilitation The h cut pro court The ć

and it has been processed according to the 2006 law. This sub law. This 2006 the to according processed been has it and beration Army, had filed a request to testify and that the court would decide about decide would court the that testify and to request a Army,beration filed had

lawyer made a statement to the court about the reasons for filing the the filing for reasons the about court the to statement a made lawyer t proceedings t

n oiial mtvtd eas Mihailovi because motivated politically en

edns tre i Spebr 00 A ti poedn, Vojislav proceeding, this At 2010. September in started ceedings

ć DragoljubMihailovi

had not had a right to defense and that he had not seen his lawyer lawyer his seen not had he that and defense to right a had not had ć ,

supported

by the Serbian Liberal Party and Kosta and PartyLiberal Serbian the by ć Čavoški anucd ht it Vukovi Rista that announced , 37 ć

, who explained that the 1946 trial and its and trial 1946 the that explained who , ć

eebe te ae of case the resembles d professor Smilja Avramov. Smilja They professor d ć

ć a nt a fedm of freedom had not had

was filed in 2006 by his his by 2006 in filed was - chapter will give an an give will chapter ć , a veteran of the the of veteran a , Čavoški Lončar ć

to death, to esses in in esses

, the the , and and CEU eTD Collection 82 81 80 79 an 1946 trial the on focused investigation circumstances ofDragoljub ofthe 9 after Killed Those Markovi Slobodan of testimony testimonies pilots histhe interest in ofthe would have changed his not guilt" Mihailovi crimes wartime the that claiming goto Yugos to hadwanted pilots of group the that explained also He Italy. to transported were they which after 40 spent they who with Chetniks, the by found been had they and Serbia in crashed trial 1946 the at testified not had pilots Americanthe because testify could he that stated court The veteran. Force Air Friend, Milton of testimony a for request the accepted court the rejected, was request guilt about be not would testimonyhis soproved, been that and political been not had decision court the that thought events historical about trial 1946 the about is which process, rehabilitation the in truth the of determination Ivanovi Aleksandar 2010. the filed rehabilitation the proceedings.sides in had which group the defin not did Act Rehabilitation of the because it, against representativesprotested request rehabilitation The proceeding. next the until it

Testimony " Ibid, 4 Ibid, Transcript Proceedingofthe of 29 Ibid May11, 2014 Rehabilitacija Draţe: Sud OdbioRehabilitacija Sud Svedočenje( Draţe: Partizana”

Rista Rista The following two proceedings of November 2011 and March 2012 consisted of the the of consisted 2012 March and 2011 November of proceedings two following The

) , Vuković's Radio Radio Televizija Vojvodine

lavia to testify in 1946, but that "the communists had not accepted that,acceptednot had "thecommunists that but 1946, testify in to lavia of September, 1944 and member of another state commission for the for commission state another of member and 1944 September, of

79 request to testify was rejected at the proceeding of 29 of proceeding the at rejected was testify to request .

81 Vukoviţ's ć itn F Milton .

d the results of the search for search ofresultsthe d the ttd n ei ta hs etmn wud o cnrbt t the to contribute not would testimony his that media in stated

th ć

ofOctober, 2010, TheBelgrade,High 2 Court, , president of president , , 09.12.2010, 09.12.2010, ,

ersnaie Bj Smiljani Bajo representative, riend talked about the 1944 the about talked riend

38 had been responsible for had been so hard, that hard, so been had for responsible been had

www.rtv.rs/sr_lat/news/print/227398 the State Commission for the Secret TombsSecret of the for Commission State the Mihailović's

Rehabilitation of Draţa: Court RejectedRehabilitation Partisan's ofCourt Draţa: 80 . At Mihailović's

death. death. the proceeding where where proceeding the Mihailović's ć event when event Marković's epand ht Vukovi that explained ,

grave. He provided the the Heprovided grave.

82 guilt had already already had guilt , lastaccessed on , .

testimony was testimony was th his plane had had plane his

of October, of Vuković's - 50 days, days, 50

and not and a USA a e two e ć

CEU eTD Collection 86 85 84 83 Mihailovi Mihailovi extradited, althoughbeen countries these good with had had relations Yugoslavia stayed had majority Mihailovi with together charges face to supposed Harry Truman.Markovi Mihailovi Markovi collaboration. and crimes Mihailovi represents Dimitrijevi Mihailovi actuallyMihailovi forcing someon of assumptions no were there but courtroom, the in disorientation his explain could Mihailovi to alcohol giving been had guards du interrupted Mihailovi represent Markovi be not had trial the that argument the supported which sources, British Yugoslav and from documents Mihailovi of death the investigated had which commission the of report a with court

Transcript Proceedingofthe of 30 Transcript Proceedingofthe of 30 Transcript Proceedingofthe of 23 M Dragoljub Nikoli Kosta 6

At Markovi proceeding, second the Markovi ć

ć ć ć ć medal the mentioning , Nikoli Kosta case, this of witnesses expert two by written , utd i sucs i hd en ree t te ayr Dragi lawyer the to ordered been had it sources, his quoted ć en conducted according to legal standards. According to the testimony where where testimony the to According standards. legal to according conducted en must have had about collaboration by describing an example of 1944, when the the when 1944, of example an describing by collaboration about had have must wih a ise b te tt pub state the by issued was which , ol hv be have could ć ihailović 1893 ihailović , BojanDimitrijevi , ig h trial the ring ć

did not talk about war crimes or collaboration of the Chetniks where where Chetniks the of collaboration or crimes war about talk not did ć ć in emigration in the United States and Great Britain and they had not not had they and Britain Great and States United the in emigration in

in only positive light, not denying, but leaving out the issues of war war of issues the out leaving but denying, not light, positive only in n he and ć

- also explained that out of 24 Chetniks in higher positions higher in Chetniks 24 of out that explained also ć 1946: Biography

n epnil a a omne, u h epand h attitude the explained he but commander, a as responsible en to drink to 83 Frhroe h rpae drn bt poedns ht the that proceedings both during repeated he Furthermore, .

, rd th th

a mt Mihailovi met had General Dragoljub Mihailović1893 General Dragoljub

ofNovember, 2011and 23 ofNovembe of March, 2012, 2012, ofTheBelgrade,March,High 5 Court, Mihailovi s ć 84

. ute tle aot h attd o teAle towards Allies the of attitude the about talked further

) ,

(Belgrade:za Zavod ć r, 2011, TheBelgrade,4High Court,

provided the court with a biography of Dragoljub biography a with Dragoljub court of the provided 39 ć

ć while waiting for and during the trial, which which trial, the during and for waiting while

ć a rcie fo Cals e ale and Gaulle de Charles from received had

ihn hue o textbooks for house lishing with some of them actually sentenced, the the sentenced, actuallythem of some with ć

ny ie ie ad a be often been had and times five only rd

of March, 2012, 2012, ofMarch, TheBelgrade,High Court, Udţbenike - 1946:Biografija , 2011) ,

(

General Joksimović 85 ć 86

. This book book This . . and Bojan Bojan and

who were who ć

and and

to e

CEU eTD Collection 89 88 87 to dedicated more movement resistance a as Chetniks the of thesis the as well as scholarship, collaborati of book justification his in was it because topic, this for important is thus and Veselinhistorian, another Nikoli Kosta mentioned 20 of proceeding the At historians. of testimonies the on based been for truth" t of nuances and "thesubtleties harm and discipline historical the to alien are which judgment of forms legal and moral of service the into work their and historians hims appear problems where is this that explains she and facts pure than rather interpretation, with dealing are witnesses expert as scholars context, h of representation honest an provides historian a If honesty. and objectivity are issues main the that arguing witnesses expert 2.2.2.as Historians circumstance Kosta Mihailovi about f Chetniks' the units their from collaborators the of some executed had Chetniks

Richard J. Evans,RichardJ. HistorianWitness","The asExpert 4,1987,13 No. KatherineinJellison,"HistoryCourtroom: in theCaseSears The Perspective", 8 Ibid, elf, warns that there has been a "judicialization of history" since the nineties, forcing forcing nineties, the since history" of "judicialization a been has there that warns elf, ioi and Nikolić Jellison summarized the main issues concerning historians testifying in courts, courts, in testifying historians concerning issues main the summarized Jellison h poedns n rglu Mihailovi Dragoljub in proceedings The

89 .

s of gt aant emn ocs n te tiue emn omnes a had had commanders German attitude the and forces German against ights

ć Mihailović's

s eey wih s gi te aa oig rm eerh oe lo by also done research from coming data the again is which enemy, a as soia fcs tee hud e o rbe. oee, n h courtroom the in However, problem. no be should there facts, istorical

oa Dimitrijevi Bojan ć

Đuretić. n Bjn Dimitrijevi Bojan and on of the Chetniks appeared for the first time in Serbian Serbian in time first the for appeared Chetniks the of on

death.

ureti ć , for the commission for the investigation of the the of investigation the for commission the for ,

is also a supporter of supporter a also is 40 Historyand Theory

ć ć

rehabilitation case since June 2012 have have 2012 June since case rehabilitation ee nie a wtess tgte with together witnesses, as invited were 88 Eas wo a a epr witness expert an was who Evans, . , , Vol.No.3,2002,326 41, 87 Mihailović's . He also put an accent on accent an put also He . The PublicH The n h eighties the in th

f ue te already the June, of he historian's search historian'ssearch he

istorian rehabilitation rehabilitation

that the the that , , Vol.9, CEU eTD Collection 92 91 90 Miha between meeting the commanders, Dimitrijevi 1941. in occupation the 1941" in units German " that explained and movement resistance a as Chetniks the recognized had which sources German analyzing by continued However,Dimitrijevi instead. Partisans the against fighting to turned had and 1941 in fights Mihailovi why victims of number high a with population Serbian the against Serbia in forces German of actions the with explained He testimony. Yugo Mihailovi against trial Dimitrijevi Mont in commanders the to letter the and Ustasha the and Chetniks the of cooperation the prove to supposed been to according he Furthermore, Chetniks. the had which by documents saved three discussed been had who Force the Air including US invited, the been of not members had Allies the from witnesses some because balanced, Dimitrijev testimony, the the of part were first testimony his of the In trial. the of topics subject the concerning facts historical and The trial 1946 the of circumstances postponed. were testimonies other the while of protection Serbian peoplethe than the Partisans

Ibid, 6 Ibid, Transcript Proceedingofthe of 20 (Belgrade:NarodnaKnjiga,19 Veselin slav legislation Dimitrijevi Dimitrijevi Bojan

Đ ureti ć

also dismissed an issue of command responsibility, which had been used in the the in used been had responsibility, which command of issue an dismissed also Dimitrijević. ć , Saveznici i JugoslovenskaSaveznicii Ratna Drama ć

91 focused on the Chetniks' wartime activities in the second part of the the of part second the in activities wartime Chetniks' the on focused . ngo n 91 odrn te iln o cmuit ad non and communists of killing the ordering 1941, in enegro

ć 92

similarly to the Nuremberg trials, but it had not been defined in the in defined been not had it but trials, Nuremberg the to similarly , which is opposed to the previous statement about no fights against against fights no about statement previous the to opposed is which ,

Those are letters to Ante Paveli Ante to letters are Those a te ny itra to historian only the was 85), 201 85),

th Mihailović's

of June, 2012, of2012, Belgrade,June, Court, TheHight 5 - 208 ć

i et hog meig o te htis n German and Chetniks the of meetings through went ć been used at the trial and which had been falsified falsified been had which and trial the at used been

ilovi talked about the trial, stating that it had not been been not had it that stating trial, the about talked

forces a forces 41 ć

and Milan Nedi Milan and

( The andAllies YugoslavWar Drama ctively participated in fights against the the against fights in participated ctively

90 give testimony at the June proceeding proceeding June the at testimony give .

ć ć

and Alojzije Stepinac which had had which Stepinac Alojzije and had stopp had ć , arguing that there had been had there that arguing ,

ed the anti the ed ) - , occupation occupation - Serbs. Serbs. ć

CEU eTD Collection 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 "ethnic as models two these described crossroa the at been having as context Đ testify to want not did he that so information enough provided in handed he document of rehabilitation the about opinion written his especiall wrote he book a with court the provided testify, but 22 of proceeding the Serbia resistance in many dimension ofthe dedicated Chetnik the to books contemporar of historian a as witness, expert an be to movement Gora Ravna Yugoslavia differently to led had which justified and collaboration motivated c different been had there that out pointing of Montenegro, territories and the Croatia in forces occupation and NDH the with collaboration the justified also and Slovenian German, Italian, with cooperate to had Partisans againstfoughthad who his commanders of largestthe known part that had he that namely arms" get eventually and progress their a as possibility it seeing nevertheless personally, cooperation this approved not had "he but forces, Mihailovi b had it that known Nedi of command the under units Chetnik some of placement the justified He collaboration. real no

ureti Ibid, 9 Ibid, 9 Ibid, 8 Ibid, Ibid, 2 Ibid, 3 Ibid, Transcript Proceedingofthe of 22 9 Ibid, ć Veselin

ć explained that his book dealt with a historical role ofDragoljub with Mihailovi historical that a his bookdealt explained

("the legalization") in 1943 in legalization") ("the ć

for his movement to destroy the Partisan movement in some territories, to stop stop to territories, some in movement Partisan the destroy to movement his for had known about his commanders collaborating with the German or Italian Italian or German the with collaborating commanders his about known had Đ ureti een the only way to protect his people his protect to way only the een nd ć

of November 2012 is a one page document, as the witness did not not did witness the as document, page one a is 2012 November of a ivtd y 2 raiain wih otne te rdto of tradition the continued which organizations 12 by invited was

ofNovember, 2012, TheBelgrade,High 2 Court, - 44 and and 44 s f to oes f uolv organization" Yugoslav of models "two of ds - 94 igitc n pro and linguistic Ti i wa Mihailovi what is This . Mihailović's 42

Mihailovi

ć. tolerance of it, that Mihailovi that it, of tolerance 93

. Dimitrijevi . He stated that the book and the the and book the that stated He - y for the rehabilitation case and case rehabilitation the for y etr bsd rpeetd by represented based, western Nedić's ć

ditd t h trial, the at admitted forces ć ontexts in occupied occupied in ontexts

97 acknowledged that acknowledged . His. testimony at 96 . 95 y age who had had who age y

. Dimitrijevi . ć

in a wider wider a in 99 ć He .

had had the the 98 ć .

CEU eTD Collection 102 101 100 stated Chetniks, who the victimsof the of descendents 18 including people, 53 by signedwas Miodrag Mileti historians that request a filed had organizations and people of group a 2013, November in Latastestified before month One bySUBNOR. requested was he the about expert other the writing than angle another from and but decades, for researching Chetniks been has Latas movement. Chetnik the to belonged which those and sources American Yugoslav, British, from Chetniks the about documents t where Serbia in Institute Historical Military the in worked had Latas it. LatahistorianBranko a thatthe court request to an sent forexecutions commands Mihailovi that evidences no been had there that and responsibility Nikoli yet. defined been of Yugoslavextermination the to peo Mihailovi sentencing filled that thesis Mihailovi the and Paveli andStepinac to letters the thatargument common that command German the Markovi by before greater retrograde Mihailovi

Ibid, 4 Ibid, 5 Ibid, Ib id,2

out used as an and evidence against him ć

The Association of the Veterans of the People's Liberation War (SUBNOR) in Serbia Serbia in War(SUBNOR)Liberation People's theVeterans the of of Association The Nikoli Nikoli Kosta andSekulovi Aleksandar

ć ad h oe hc dsryd eba lns n hre uolva pragmaticYugoslavia, harmed and lands Serbian destroyed which one the and , ć

also interpreted the 1946 court decision, stating that the main reason for for reason main the that stating decision, court 1946 the interpreted also - Croatian and g and Croatian ć

ć and Dimitrijevi and ć

testified at the same proceeding, shortly repeating the arguments given arguments the repeating shortly proceeding, same the at testified

had been the betrayal of the People's Liberation War and contribution WarLiberation and People's the of betrayal the been had

102 ć

the Chetniks had been a resistance movement. He supported the the supported He movement. resistance a been had Chetniks the . ć de ta Mihailovi that added

had had a lot of signed blank papers, which had been found and found been lot had a and which ofsigned had papers, had blank ć reater

should be also considered also be should ć ple in the region, as the criminal act of genocide had not not had genocide of act criminal the as region, the in ple

about the nature of the 1946 trial and the perception of perception the and trial 1946 the of nature the about - Albanian, personified by Broz Josip Tito" 43 101

had not been sentenced for command command for sentenced been not had s

ć should testify and the courtaccepted the testify and should

presented at the trial had been fake been had trial the at presented

as expert witnesses. The request request witnesses.The expert as witnesses, which is why why is which witnesses, ć

had personally given given personally had he archives include include archives he Zečević 100 .

Antun , CEU eTD Collection 106 105 104 103 the from historians the of testimonies analyzed truth" material the fit not had testimonies their that historians as aware been had they although statements, Kosta Nikoli and DimitrijeviBojan against lawsuit a organizationsfiled other some and Serbia of Antifascists orgiven killed also German som forces the to had they that added but pilots, American of lot a saved had Chetniks the that acknowledged He examples. the presenting answer, positive a gave he and sources American and British cr and collaboration the of proofs any found had he whether archive the including Chetniks, the on research his in sources Yugoslav and foreign used had he that explained from army his separating them, attack or them against fight not would mentioned Mihailovithat court, the been at before not had which content the adding 1941, Divci in command German the antifascist" not and "collaborationist been had movement Chetnik the that beginning the in away right stated He historians. previous rehabilitationsupporters ofMihailovi ofthe Bra been had crimes Chetnik the testifyabout to invited witness onlyexpert the as side, other the hear to need a was there that

accessedMay2014 on 16, 30.10.2013, RehabilitationofMihailović:Draţa Process DemandAntifascists ofWitnessesNewHearing " http://www.helsinki.org.rs/serbian/doc/krivicna%20prijava%20hos%20sept_17_2013.pdf availableLawsuit, on 4 Ibid, Transcript Proceedingofthe of 25 Proces Rehabilitacije Proces Mihailovića:Draţe Antifašisti TraţeseSaslušajuda Novi Svedoci”( The testimony of Branko Latas was completely opposed to the testimonies of the the of testimonies the to opposed completely was Latas Branko of testimony The Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, Womenthe Black,Serbia, of Association in in Rights Human for Committee Helsinki

http://www.e 106 ć . They provided the court with 1000 pages of materials, together with with together materials, of pages 1000 with court the provided They .

in in August they"had presented that 2013, stating s in Washington, Vienna, Munich Washington,Vienna, in s - novine.com/drustvo/92947

November,2013, TheHigh Cou ć k Lts wie h ohr or inse wr long were witnesses four other the while Latas, nko

had presented his proposal to the Germans, saying that he he that saying Germans, the to proposal his presented had 104 ć . Latas described the meeting of Mihail of meeting the described Latas . 103 e pilotse 44 - . Antifaisti

rncit o te rceig. h Public The proceedings. the of transcripts 105 . -

trae

and Freiburg and - rt, Belgrade, rt, 2 sasluaju imes against the Muslims in the in Muslims the against imes

- non novi . The court asked Latas asked court The . - -

svedoci.html facts false and correct

h Prias He Partisans. the

The ) , E , last , - Novine ovi ć -

time with , ć

CEU eTD Collection the Yugoslav included have is why been which the not theyin narrative, case. Mihailovi continuation a as perceived are rehabilitation the oppose and crimes war that and collaboration consider who historians the War, World Second Mihailovi of Ashistorians. of arguments opposed the with conflicted and questioned not are witnesses the of interpretations the that implies This media. and society civil Serbian the witne Mihailovi of case the In case. the in side another be cannot there courts, in rehabilitation of implementation of way Rehabili 2006 the of issues the reflects witnesses of choice the of problem testimonies. The their and witnesses of choice decision about the the of rehabilitation the about Mihailovi Dragoljub Court High the from announcement any or continuation no r the about theydecide that council the of adviser Kosta Nikoli char the about made was decision court the until days Mihailovi i 2.2.3. Theissues March. of end the in rejected also was appeal the However, did. organizations the what is which right appeal, to the February with in lawsuitrejected2014 Belgradethe in Prosecutor'sOffice sses, with an exception of Branko Latas, who was included because of the pressure by by pressure the of because included was who Latas, Branko of exception an with sses,

h mi ise i te ae f h rhbltto o Daojb Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of case the in issues main The Dragoljub of rehabilitation of process the in proceeding more one only was There ć

on 25 on ć ć

reflects the tendency of delegitimization of Yugoslavia and its narratives of the of Yugoslaviathe delegitimization of narrativesof tendency its the reflectsand for giving facts their testimonies. in historical false At proceeding, same the the P eiet f eba Oie Anti Oliver Serbia, of resident th

of December of n the rehabilitation nthe process ć

ć charges against the has been two historians made. until today, although it was supposed to be continued in February and and February in continued be to supposed was it today, although until , that means that those who support the rehabilitation are invited as as invited are rehabilitation the support who those that means that , ainAt s h lw eie non defines law the As Act. tation

2013, where the court decided to postpone the process for 45 processfor thepostponetodecided thewhere court 2013, ehabilitation as soon as possible. However, there has been However,has possible. there as soon as ehabilitation 45

apae ad eadd rm h court the from demanded and appeared , e aant oa Dimitrijevi Bojan against ges - contentious proceeding as a a as proceeding contentious ć

had been guilty for for guilty been had the rehabilitation rehabilitation the

are the the are ć

and and

of CEU eTD Collection Second Worldthe of veterans ofWar. associations the and politicians involving su Herzegovina, region the in countries from came reactions negative 2.3.Contestation not had be there any orcollaboration. ofwarcrimes proofs been have Mihailovi whether is would experts legal the which by answered question Another standards. legal the to according conducted Yugoslaviaof practice court and law the for experts be to have would there issues, legal the discuss to order In witnesses. expert witne particular of choice only not why is This Serbia. WorldWar Second in the of circumstances and Latas trial. expert were who historians However, all manipulated. ideologically and politically properlyor conducted Mihailovi sentenced which 1946 of decision court Vukovi Rista reject to order C the of activities rehabilitation the in case. court the serve to supposed was which book a written had he that fact the from seen be could dedi His Serbia. in works his in appeared first movement Chetnik the of activities wartime the of justification the as witness, important an is he project, funded long state - - time supporters of the rehabilitation. Although rehabilitation. the of supporters time udd omsin fr netgto o te icmtne of circumstances the of investigation for commissions funded sses is problematic, although according to the 2006 law, but the choice of historians as historians of choice the law, but 2006 the to according although problematic, is sses The court stated that the purpose of the rehabilitation case is not dealing with the the with dealing not is case rehabilitation the of purpose the that stated court The witnesses remark is that all except An important h rhbltto o Daojb Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation The witnesses discussed the period of the Second World War and not only the 1946 the only not WorldWarand Second the of period the discussed witnesses Đ hetniks during the Second World War, which was the argument used in in used argument the was which War, World Second the during hetniks

ureti ć

did not even mention the trial, but talked only about the the about only talked but trial, the mention even not did ć

as a witness. The aim of the rehabilitation is annulment of the the of annulment is rehabilitation the of aim The witness. a as , to ,

determine what was wrong at the at wrong was what determine 46

ć has been a contested subject. External External subject. contested a been has

ć Đ would have been sentenced anyway if if anyway sentenced been have would

ureti Đ o et ad hte te ra was trial the whether and death to ureti

ć ch as Croatia and Bosnia and and Bosnia and Croatia as ch

ć s o a ebr f n state any of member a not is

and Latas and members ofthe are cation to the rehabilitation the to cation Mihailović's

trial and if it was was it if and trial

death death and - CEU eTD Collection 108 107 region back of the dragg was collaborators Nazi and quislings of rehabilitation the that and M Mihailovi calling by disagreement his expressed criminals war about was it because happen, not publicly clear must rehabilitation the that and do, come could they least the be would to ambassador of withdrawal had president and government the that demanding if and government Croatian the against harshly react would HDZ that stated Parliament Mihailovi Frano Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of because Serbia from ambassador Croatian withd the requested (HDZ) Union Democratic Croatian party political the 2012, region 2.3.1.inthe Reactions issue. the about debate The Serbi involved Rights. also has Human rehabilitation for Committee Helsinki the by led society civil Mihailoviexpected becaus 2012, in strongest the were reactions sub this in given be will region the from reactions the of examples main The

inister of inister Apr http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2012&mm=03&dd=28&nav_id=595105 " za http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.290.html:373403 Only ReadyHate for V.C. Spasojevi eaiiain f h Cenk hpee. e peld o rain pol Croatian to appealed He happened. Chetniks the of rehabilitation Povući ZbogDra Ambasadora - mrznju

il2014 8, Matošić

The strongest external reactions on the rehabilitation came from Croatia. In March March In Croatia. from came rehabilitation the on reactions external strongest The Interest increased after the talk show In Medias Res on Croatian national television national Croatian on Res Medias In show talk the after increased Interest The strongest opposition to the rehabilitation of Mihailovi of rehabilitation the to opposition strongest The , lastaccessed , on April2014 8, F oreign

, a HDZ representative in the Croatian parliament European observer the and Croatian HDZ at , a the in representative ć , " RehabilitacijaHrvatiDraţe:naSpremni Mrţnju”( Samo 108 ć )

. A , to be rehabilitated be byto ofthe end year. the

Večernje ffairs, VesnaPusi ffairs,

ţe”(

Novosti

ToRetreat the BecauseAmbassador of , 31.03.2012, 31.03.2012, ,

an historians who have been strongly divided on this this on divided strongly been have who historians an ć , stated that the rehabilitation process made her sad her made process rehabilitation the that stated , e the Serbian media and High Court in Belgrade Belgrade in Court High and media Serbian the e 47

107 ć . The The .

wr rmnl n h mda ad the and media, the in criminal war a - Rehabilitacija P resident of C of resident

Rehabilitation Croats Draţa: of Draţa), ć

- in Serbia has been in the in been has Serbia in Draze

roatia, Ivo Josipovi Ivo roatia, B92 ing all the countries countries the all ing - Hrvati ,28.03.2012, , lastaccessed on , itical leaders, leaders, itical - - spremni chapter. The chapter. rawal of the the of rawal hr the where - Serbia samo ć ć - , .

CEU eTD Collection 112 111 110 109 the fought had Ustasha Germans with together the and again Chetniks the when cases many recall could but occupation, the against fight former of Yugoslaviaany rememberparts other not and could Croatia he in that Chetniks and Serbia Mihailovi of rehabilitation the because protest, official than other reaction no be could there that out pointed also He decision. court final of the with wait would Croatia but state, Serbian the of move good Mihailovi Dragoljub rehabilitate to attempt the thatCroatia in officialslocal some which negative caused historian, of a further Croatia, in especially reactions ta in testimony expert objective from far were Party. However,Pejin’sstatements Radical Serbian h of because city" Serbian "a Vukovar nineties, calling the in Croatia in war the to then and NDH and Ustasha the of crimes war the to Yugoslaviaa its led had and liberation a as Chetniks the Mihailovi Dragoljub about and movement talked Pejin Belgrade. from discussion the joined Croatia Mihailovi of rehabilitation the was theme main the where (HRT)

https://www.youtube.com/watch historian Zdravko Tomac DemocraticDemokratskaStranka), Party(Istarska fromMarijoHistoryforCroatian Jarebthe Institute and Ivan Tepe Ibid ovjenosti.html Novine "

Rehabilitacija Mihailovića: Poraz Čovječnosti” RehabilitacijaMihailovića:Poraz ( upres f h rhbltto o Mihailovi of rehabilitation the of supporters

111 The Croatian Croatian The 109 The reaction to the Croatian disagreement with the rehabilitation in Serbia came came Serbia in rehabilitation the with disagreement Croatian the to reaction The , 16.03.2012, 16.03.2012, , H epand ht vroe nw which knew everyone that explained He . , a historian and former dire former and historian a , š

from StrankaThe(HrvatskaPartyCroatian of Rights Prav is former position as director of the Historical Archives and membership in the in membership and HistoricalArchives the of director as position former is , lastaccessed on , April2014 8, http://www.e P resident, Ivo Josipovi Ivo resident,

rmy against the occupation. Furthermore, Pejin changed the topic the changed Furthermore,Pejin occupation. the rmy against ?v=yd48Q_4sQIo - novine.com/region/region 110 . The host of the talk show, Petar Vlahov, invited Pejin Pejin invited Vlahov, Petar show, talk the of host The . ć

ctor of the Historical Archives of Serbia, Jovan Pejin, Pejin, Jovan Serbia, of ArchivesHistorical the of ctor s lae wo a nt cetd h cptlto of capitulation the accepted not had who leader a as

RehabilitationHumanityfor ofMihailović:Defeat ć , last accessed,last on April2014 8, st the Partisansst the , gave a moderate statement after complaints of complaints after statement moderate a gave , 48

ć s n nenl su o te eulc of Republic the of issue internal an is uig icus smlr o ht n the in that to similar discourse using , - tema/60978

crimes had been committed by the the by committed been had crimes 112 a), MP a), Damir fromKajinIstrian the .

- Rehabilitacija ć . Besides the guests from from guests the Besides . ficial reaction until the until reaction ficial

- Mihailovia bloids. ć

was not a a not was - ) poraz ,

E from - - CEU eTD Collection 114 113 Mihailovi of rehabilitation the about deciding street" "the it to responded never had Croatian the by pensi received veterans rehabilitated the and 1993 been in parliament had regime Ustasha the of members the and NDH" Mihailovi histo of rehabilitation or moral a have not did Croatia that was argument which theybut and not were side, Chetnik the on criminals war surely were "there that added He comrades. as Chetniks the recognized France and England States, United the while Allies, the fit not did politics (NDH Croatia of State Independent the called he Furthermore, nineties. the of beginning the in already Partisans the with quislings the equalized it because it, on comment to right least the had Croatia and Serbia of Republic the that Ustasha. and Chetniks the of equalization the about thesis the included had politicians Croatian the of statements the between difference the stressing the to and nineties out the in Partisans the with them equalized having for pointed Croatia accusing movement, They intellectuals. Serbian and Croatian between eighties

http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.290.html:3734 Only ReadyHate for V.C. Spasojevi April2014 8, http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2012&mm=03&dd=28&nav_id=595105 " za Povući Draţe”( zbog Ambasadora - mrznju has Another response came from The Serbian Renewal Movement(SPO), Serbian Renewal from The came response Another respondedHomen,SlobodanSerbia, in MinistryDefense State of the Secretary The in

question of the rehabilitation of Dragoljub Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of question

been organizing commemorations of the Chetniks since the nineties. Their main Their nineties. the since Chetniks the of commemorations organizing been , lastaccessed , on April2014 8,

ć , " RehabilitacijaHrvatiDraţe:Spremni Mrţnju”za( Samo "),

will not be not will rehabilitated"

Večernje

114 ć

. SPO argued that it was the judges and not the politicians and and politicians the not and judges the was it that argued SPO . and discuss "antifascist and anti and "antifascist discuss and

Novosti ToRetreat the BecauseAmbassador of , 31.03.2012, ,

) "a Nazi puppet state of the Tripartite Part" whose whose Part" Tripartite the of state puppet Nazi "a ) htis n te sah, lhuh oe f the of none although Ustasha, the and Chetniks 49 113

ons higher than the Partisans' and Serbia Serbia and Partisans' the than higher ons 03 - Rehabilitacija ć , based on the historical facts, and facts, historical the on based , ia rgt o omn o the on comment to right rical - ai ue" a te "genocidal the as rules", Nazi ć

was an internal issue of the the of issue internal an was Draţa) Rehabilitationo - Draze , B92 - Hrvati ,28.03.2012, , lastaccessed on , a political partypolitical a f Croats Draţa: - spremni Ustasha - samo -

CEU eTD Collection 117 116 115 of of Greater creation ata project Serbia Chetnik the legalizing by Montenegro and Croatia Herzegovina, and Bosnia affected it that explained He issue. internal an solely not was Serbia in ideology their and Chetniks the of Assembly,Slavica National Denis Herzegovina and Bosnia Bosnia in rehabilitation w Mihailovi that possibility the of because Serbia with relations diplomatic breaks Herzegovina and Bosnia Patriot Bosnian the Croatia, in HDZ Similarlyto genocide. Srebrenica the anniversaryof the around marches even and gatherings near statu a been had there that and nineties, the in war the during movement Chetnik the revivalof a been had there that fact the own conscience mitheir and clean to order in Serbia attack to minutes five their for waited had Croats "the that explained He Chetniks. the with Ustasha the of crimes the equalize to attempted they why is which the of pres the under been had and propaganda movement Ustasha and rehabilitation the on founded been had Croatia that said Veritas, the been process had c that

V.C. Spasojevi Ibid last accessed last on April2014 8, http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.ph " O ReadyHate for I BiH I RehabilitacijeProtiv Draţe”( Višegrad

The reactions were strong in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well, especially considering considering especially well, as Herzegovina and Bosnia in strong were reactions The Savo The vice president of the House of Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of of Parliamentary Assemblythe of Representatives of House the of president vice The Š

ć ra, h drco o te eba dcmnain n ifrainl center informational and documentation Serbian the of director the trbac, ć

n ta te upres f h Cenk oeet a be organizing been had movement Chetnik the of supporters the that and , " ol b rhblttd lhuh t i nt apn te pnos bu the about opinions the happen, not did it Although rehabilitated. be could nly RehabilitacijaHrvatiDraţe:Spremni Mrţnju”za( Samo )

ere veryere negative. onducted standardsaccording European to

nimize their ownnimize their warcrimes" guilt forthe Đ

uki e of Mihailovi of e Bećirović ć BiH Againstthe Rehabilitationof - p?yyyy=2012&mm=03&dd=22&nav_category=12&nav_id=593345 Dejanovi ic Party (BPS) demanded from the Presidency that that Presidency the from demanded (BPS) Party ic the expense ofotherthe countriesregion expense in

sent an open letter to the president of the Serbian Serbian the of president the to letter open an sent

ć 50 , stating that endi that stating , ć

built in Dobrunska Rijeka (called Rijeka Dobrunska in built

sure of the crimes committed by the Ustasha, Ustasha, bythe committed crimes the of sure Draţa ng the process of legalization of process the ng Rehabilitation ofCroats Draţa:

aswell 115 116 .

. )

, B92 , 22.03.2012, , 117 Draţevina . Bećirović , )

CEU eTD Collection 119 118 a only not was it because rehabilitation, the Bosnian against the protesting keep that would stated intellectuals Law, International and Humanity against Crimes Researching it in live who people certain for also was there where Serbia Greater create to sought ideology this that know "[w]e because problem a was it that explained He movement. Chetnik the of ideology the of rehabilitation the included it because Bosnia of sovereignty the to threat Kamberovi Husnija Sarajevo, in History for Institute Mihailovi Dragoljub of legitimization the and project Mihailovi Chetnik non the the of against part central genocide a and were cleansing population ethnic that saying by continued He Che the of goals the of realization practical a were Herzegovina and Bosnia YugoslavKrivokapi nineties. the in wars cou all on to support of that his problemletter in about as well. r he and Serbia to visits official his during Assembly National Tadi Boris Serbia of president former the with law veteran 2004 the by Chetniks the and Partisans the of equalization the of issue the discussed already had

accessedon April2014 8, http://www.mojevijesti.ba/novost/119289/Glas Rehabilitationof " zlodjela http://www.nezavisne.com/novosti/bih/Reakcije of " Glas izProtiv CrneGlasRehabilitacije Gore Mihailovića” Draţe (Voice Reakcije u BiH: ReReakcijeBiH: u Draţa Similarly to the officials, the Bosnian intellectuals agreed that the rehabilitation of of rehabilitation the that agreed intellectuals Bosnian the officials, the to Similarly Ranko parliament, Montenegrin the of president The - ć ntries in the region because it is a dangerous attempt of revising the history of the the of history the revising of attempt dangerous a is it because region the in ntries 134429.html MihailovićCrimesthe Neglects

legitimized the crimes ofhis followers Bosnia in Herzegov and Bećirović Draţa habilitacijaZanemaruje Mihailovića Draţe ( Zlodjela” , lastaccessed on , April2014 7, ć

Mihailovi ol srosy fet ona n Hreoia Te ietr f the of director The Herzegovina. and Bosnia affect seriously could , stating that the rehabilitation of Dragoljub Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation the that stating ,

ć) , Moje Moje Vijesti ) , Nezavisne Novine Nezavisne

119 ć -

iz explained that "the war in Croatia and especiallyand Croatia in in "thewar that explained - ". Smail Smail ". u , , 05.04.2012, - - Crna BiH 51

- - Gora Rehabilitacija Č - , 28.03.2012, , protiv ć eki age ta te r the that argued , ć te ietr f h Isiue for Institute the of director the ,

no place not only for Bosnia, but but Bosnia, for only not place no rehabilitacije fromagainstthe Montenegro - Draze Krivokapić, Reactions inReactionsRehabilitation BiH: - eminded eminded ć Mihailovića

n te rsdn o the of president the and - Draze

ehabilitation was a a was ehabilitation ina" sent an open letter open an sent - Đ Mihailovića - tnik movement. movement. tnik zanemaruje uki ć 118

had an effect effect an had . ć

- Dejanovi - Serbian Serbian , last , - Draţa ć

CEU eTD Collection 122 121 120 revisionism. He argued: Mihailovi of rehabilitation as such ideas that rehabilitationsaying the of that it would meanrehabilitated, the rehabilitation ofev be would crimes and politics movement, a such of leader the been had who person a if that clear it made He Ustasha. the of those to compared be could which Herzegovina, and Bosnia committ had which movement the of rehabilitation the is problem such initiativesabout antifascists its Mihailovi of followers the of victims of number high the recognizing history. of revision political and ideological an conducted and facts also but issue, scientific and historical

of " intelektualci RehabilitationofMihailovićDraţa " accessedon April2014 8, http://www.slobodnaevropa.org/content/bih_rehabilitacija_Mihailovića_je_opasna/24527913.html inRehabilitationBiH: Mihailovi of Marija Arnautovi Reakcije u BiH: Rehabilitacija Draţe Mihailovića ZanemarujeRehabilitacijaReakcijeBiH: Mihailovića Draţeu ( Zlodjela” BošnjačkiRehabilitacijeIntelektualci Mihailovića” Protiv Draţe ( Draţa thought that weovercamethought them that 15 from times old some to back going are otherwe that some afraid promote am I and other each accusing actually of too circle vicious a entering We "heroes".are come and will him time against their radically extremism, are who those and supporting are who Those this. with something achieve rehabilitat Liberal Ivo Goldstein, a historian from Croatia, summarized the reactions in the region by by region the in reactions the summarized Croatia, from historian a Goldstein, Ivo former The

Mihailovi - - democratic public, in Serbia, BiH and Croatia, is appalled by the the by appalled is Croatia, and BiH Serbia, in public, democratic protiv and especially Serbian antifascists had to raise their voices and not stay silent silent stay not and voices their raise to had antifascists Serbian especially and o ad t s gis i. h eteit i ec o tee tts will states these of each in extremists The it. against is it and ion ć ,

ć - " P rehabilitacije

Reakcije u BiH: RehabilitacijaReakcijeBiH: Mihailovićau VodiIstorijski( u Revizionizam” Neglects the Crimesthe Neglects resident of the Presidency of Yugoslaviaof Presidency Dizdarevithe of Raif resident 120 .

- Draze Mihailović could ) ć ,

Leads to Historical LeadsRevisionism to Blic - Mihailovića 122 ) ,04.04.2012,

a moral one, as the rehabilitation falsified historical historical falsified rehabilitation the as one, moral a 52 n te wl b pooig hi own their promoting be will they and , lastaccessed , on April2014 5,

http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Politika/315661/Bosnjacki

ć only situation the Bosniain make worse and

erything was fascism that would cause a new wave of historical historical of wave new a cause would - 20 years before, for which we which for before, years 20 Bos ) , niak Intellectualsniak the against Slobodna Evropa,Slobodna Draţa Reactions inReactionsRehabilitation BiH: , will glorify him him glorify will , ć d h wrt rms in crimes worst the ed , the Bosnian state and and state Bosnian the ,

Č eki 121 ć

ć 27.03.2012, argued that the the that argued .

ad ht by that, said Reactions , last last , - CEU eTD Collection 125 124 123 Mihailovi of rehabilitation movemen crimes the Chetnik referredto it ofthe and media the in 23 on Belgrade in Court High the of front in protest for call a published cited organizations the same the ideology" the feelings would harm ofmany ofChetnik it victims and families incite Mihailovi forces of rehabilitation the antifascist that claimed Europe's organizations from Serbia excludes it that and re the that claim They humanity. against crimes for the responsible movement is the it of leader that a and of rehabilitation rehabilitation, of process court the in opinion public of manipulation Mihailovi Dragoljub of organizations few a of name the in release press a issued Committee Helsinki The approaching. was March of media, Bosnia in and Croatia Herzegovina in asreactions and appeared witnesses fordeliberately the giving testimonies. false to appealing on based a been protests, organizing community, international has activity Their it. the around and gathered Serbia Rights organizations Human for Committee Helsinki the by mainly Serbia, in society civil 2.3.2.of Reactions

rd Leagueof HumanforAntifascists CivilofCommittee LawersSerbia, Rights, Initiatives, Ibid http://www.helsinki.org.rs/press_t46.html in"PartnersPressHumanReleasefor Crime", HelsinkiCommitteeSerbia,(Belgrade: Rights 19.03.2012), and CoordinationofPresident the Fourthof Committee the VojvodinaConvention

of March, when the next proceeding was scheduled to take place. The call was published was published call Theplace. take to scheduled wasproceeding next the when March, of The first big protests of civil society happened in March 2012, at the same time as the the as time same the at 2012, March in happened society civil of protests big first The Mihailovi Dragoljub of rehabilitation The

neighboring countries' distrust in Serbia having waged the 1990s wars practically for for practically wars 1990s the waged having Serbia in distrust countries' neighboring Two days after the press release, under the name of "NO to Rehabilitation Campaig Rehabilitation"NO Two of to theunderrelease,name press the days after habilitation annuls the antifascist struggle of Serbian and Yugoslav people Yugoslav people and Serbian of struggle antifascist the annuls habilitation 123

on 19 on

society th ć and the Chetnik movement. The press release addresses the the addresses release press The movement. Chetnik the and

of March, expressing their disagreement with the rehabilitation the with disagreement their expressing March, of as not only the normalization of a clearly negative historical historical negative clearly a of normalization the only not as

, lastaccessed on , April2014 8, 53

d hy ud w hsoin wo r expert are who historians two sued they nd ć

was opposed most strongly by the civil civil the by strongly most opposed was ć

n te htis wud only "would Chetniks the and

t and the significance of the significancet ofthe the and 124 Ohr hn ht the that, than Other . the proceedingthe of23 Ţ ivanBerisavljevi

WomeninBlack 125 ć

n", n", rd

CEU eTD Collection 128 127 126 of Association The 2013. and 2012 during Chetniks the of activities wartime the about in Dragoljub leader movement's the and significancemovement it during had nineties. wars the in the the of rehabilitation judicial Mihailovi a in culminate "soon would which movement Chetniks the of rehabilitation political and moral the of reminded neighboring co the with Serbia'srelations and society Serbian affect could which rehabilitation of process the about countries their that initiative showing signature its community, international ofDragoljubcarrying Mihailović portraits the Mladić Ratko and member with movement, Gora Ravna the of veterans and members and Mihailović of rehabilitation the of supporters the gathering street, the of side other the on protest another faced protesters The rehabilitation. Mihailovi depicting slogans with banners the carrying organizations 14 representativesof gathered court the of front in protest The Herzegovina. and Bosnia and Montenegro Chetnik Serbia, of territory the in movement the Chetnik of practice and ideology the movement of rehabilitation complete the but figure,

h ntaie a initiative the Center for Culturalfor Center Fou Decontamination, Alliance of ofAntifascists Vojvodina, Antifascist ActionNovi Sad, YouthInitiativeHumanfor Rights, www.pescanik.net/2012/03/ratni " May2014 9, Internationalthe"Appeal Community",to July, 2012, Euro Center,BelgradeHumanfor IndependentCenter Journalists'Rights, Associationof Vojvodinaforand Cener Ratni Zločinac Draţa Mihailović “ZločinacRatni( MihailovićDraţa - n uy 02 te ntaie gis te eaiiain ulse a apa t the to appeal an published rehabilitation the against initiative the 2012, July In Another aspect of the activities of the Helsinki Committee and the other the and Committee Helsinki the of activities the of aspect Another AtlanticStudies 127 ć 126 " . The initiative appealed to embassies to inform their governments and public in public and governments their inform to embassies to appealed initiative The . 128 Te al nldd h ls o te crime the of list the included call The .

Te et lo ae n vriw f h wrie ciiis f h Chetnik the of activities wartime the of overview an gave also text The . ant h rhbltto o Mihailovi of rehabilitation the gainst

zlocinac o te a rgt raiain Orz n Dei srpske Dveri and Obraz organizations right far the of s WarCriminal ć -

ndation"Biljana Draţa as

untries and the international community.international the and appealuntries The - ciia ad xrsig iareet with disagreement expressing and criminal a Mihailović/ 54 Draţa www.helsinki.org.rs/press_t47.html

Mihailovi Kovačević

, lastaccessed on , April2014 5, s and numbers of the victims of the the of victims the of numbers and s ć

ae en eis f ulc lectures public of series been have

ć) oe raiain jie the joined organizations more

, Vučo Peščanik .

", Group"Spomenik", ", Policy

, 21.03.2012, 21.03.2012, , , lastaccessed on ,

organizations CEU eTD Collection 129 the dictators in party one live of system to used had they that and trial political manipulated typical a been had it that hadrehabilitation forgottenthe opposed who 1946,arguing those of that trial therepeating be Mihailovi against injustice historical the Mihailovi that filed, been had request of supporters main the of one been movement. Chetnik the of nature antifascist the on insist and statements media their in collaboration Mih to done was injustice that and manipulated was trial 1946 the that is argument main Their of circumstances the and Yugoslavof regime crimes the of investigation othe and the about opinions common most few a from rehabilitation willmedia listed be of examples The Serbia. in politics history th sees side other the while injustice, legal and historical a of correction a as rehabilitation the considers side one where society Serbian in topic this of contestation general the resemble opinions Their publications. Mihailovi 2.3.3.amongThedivision intellectuals w 2014 in Reactions" Public Rehabilitation: the to "No book a published Serbia of Antifascists hich gathers in reactions critical hich onmedia rehabilitation ofMihailović. the

Nada ailović, which should be corrected by rehabilitation. Besides that, they deny Chetnik Chetnik deny they that, Besides rehabilitation. by corrected be should which ailović, The comments supporting comments rehabilitationThe the witnesses mostly were expert by the made Dragoljub of rehabilitation the of topic the about divided been havehistorians Serbian Kovačević,“Ispravljanjeli Istorije:Dabiti će Obnovljen Proces?”Sudski( hsoin wo ee lo ebr o te state the of members also were who historians r ć

Kosta Nikoli Kosta n te eae a be tkn place taking been has debate the and ć

, the expert witness and author of the biography of Mih of biography the of author and witness expert the , hip rhbltto o Mihailovi of rehabilitation e

129 . Nikoli . Mihailović's ć

below should be rehabilitated because it was important that important was it because rehabilitated be should ć

was correcte was

talked about rehabilitation when the process has has process the when rehabilitation about talked . 55

rehabilitation. He stated in 2007, after the after 2007, in stated He rehabilitation.

d. He claimed that the best way would waywould best the that claimed He d. in media, rather than in academic academic in than rather media, in ć

s cliain f revisionist of culmination a as - funded commissions for for commissions funded CorrectingHistory: Will Mihailović's

ailovi

death. death. ć , has , CEU eTD Collection 132 131 130 done was what not today and time communist the of trials some the been if had it that notion, emphasized ideological He innocent. often victims, been had who people the to relationfair a reach to order necessary in wasrevision a by that sayingChetniks the by replaced are Partisans the where remembrance of culture the in turn the and history Mihailovi Nik soldier. German dead one for civilians 100 killing been had Serbia in policy German the as occupation, against fight withwaited had he reason the was which people Serbian the protect with collaboration alleged for and WarLiberation People's the of traitor a as but people, Serbian the of traitor Mihailovi that out pointing started, already

"BojanDimitrijevi Rehabilitacija Mihailovi VukCvijiZ. accessedMay2014 on 9, The TrialBeRepeated LjudmilaCvetkovi mesto http://www.glassrpske.com/plus/teme/Bojan RehabilitateMihailović DeservedhimabackinPlace Giveand to History oli 132 ć Dimitrijevi by shared antifascism anti Serbia, to in belonging that misunderstanding citizens, still and intellectuals is there because happened, has the that is s nothing me but Chetniks the worries and Partisans the which equalized National Assembly been fact The history. in him has to belongs which place which enormously, Mihailovi and positive be will result the that commissionsuppose our docum the helped researching institutions The this. with deal state to state Serbian the of wish a is there that and model good a century.is twentieth this the Ithink of history Serbian in deserves he place the Mihailovi to paid be really must Respect Dimitrijevi Bojan witness, expert Another

- . also that said Mihailovi u - ć srpsko

ć in an an in interview:

– ć

European Duty European , " - Mihailovića j Istoričar: Rehabilitacija Istoričar: Mihailovića - istoriji/lat/46153.html ć ć ć 131 : , " emn. e u a acn t te at ht ialvć a wne to wanted had Mihailović that fact the to accent an put He Germany. MihailovićaRehabilitovatii Vratiti uZasluţenoMesto Srpskoju Istoriji”( epne t te rtqe ta te eaiiain ersn revision represent rehabilitation the that critiques the to responded . Rehabilitacija Kvislinga: Odriče liKvislinga:RehabilitacijaOdričese Srbija Antifašizma?”( ?),

Politika

- evropska )

, Blic ents about execution of Mihailovi of execution about ents , 16.0 , ć , 22.11.2012, ,

had neverhad Germans with collaborated - obaveza , lastaccessedMay 2014 on 9, , 1.2007, - Dimitrijević , last accesseMay 2014 on , 10, www.politika.rs/rubrike/Drustvo/tl17254.lt.html http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Drustvo/354377/Istoricar ć

56 had been not convicted as a war criminal or a or criminal war a as convicted not been had –

EvropskaObaveza” ( ć , by rehabilitating him and givinghi and him rehabilitating by ,

- Mihailovića ć , commented on the rehabilitation and and rehabilitation the on commented , - omns ws poie to opposite was communism

- ć rehabilitovati

will be finally put in the the in put finally be will ć ) ,

Historian:Rehabilitat

GlasSrpske, and his remains, so I so remains, his and 130 Rehabilitationof - .

i - thing had had an an had had thing

vratiti

25.09.2010, 25.09.2010, - mu pecial , last , To - zasluzeno on of - m

of of -

CEU eTD Collection 135 134 133 started had revisionism the that claiming dominant, are past the of interpretations nationalist questioned be way,shoul same the in and processes Nuremberg the to compared be could which trial, public the at present been had media and representatives foreign the that and occupiers the that added Mihailovi that legally and formally proof to order in trial the repeat to necessary be would it that arguing Petrovi Dragoljub past. the of revision politically motivated represents movement Chetnik the of leader the of rehabilitation for paid had Partisans they that was problem the but crimes, Mihailovi which over units Chetnik separated the where time the region" Mihailovi to reputation and honor of returning against anything have not do Washingtonor "London that out pointed further He it. proofed which Mihailovi because anti an been had Chetniks the that claim the that stressed 1944, after executed those of tombs the for searches

V.C. Spasoj html http://www.slobodnaevropa.org/content/rehabilitacije_kvislinga_odrice_li_se_srbija_antifasizma/24525465. Quislings:SerbiaIs Disowning Antifascism? The TrialBeRepeated Nada Ibid Hate forReady Only

, lastaccessed2014 May10, on , h opnns f h rhbltto mil srs te olbrto ad ht the that and collaboration the stress mainly rehabilitation the of opponents The SrĎan Todor Kulji Todor 133 Kovačević 134 . Cvetkovi . there was a lot of documentation proofing that Mihailovi that proofing documentation of lot a was there .

evi

135 Cvetkovi ć ć

, " . , " a ujsl snecd n ta wud e a rcdn i te ol" He world". the in precedent "a be would that and sentenced unjustly was -

European and fascist movement could not be supported by histori by supported be not could movement fascist and European RehabilitacijaHrvatiDraţe:Spremni Mrţnju”za( Samo

Ispravljanje Istorije: Da liIspravljanjebitiIstorije:Da će Obnovljen Proces?”Sudski( ć ć

) ć had been internationally accepted as an antifascist and there were facts facts were there and antifascist an as accepted internationally been had

put the rehabilitation in the context of historical revisionism where the where revisionism historical of context the in rehabilitation the put

)

did not ignore the fact that there was "a bloody civil war" in Serbia at Serbia in war" civil bloody "a was there that fact the ignore not did

ć , a historian who has been a member of the State Commission which Commission State the of member a been has who historian a ,

e xplained that he was against the rehabilitation of Mihailovi of rehabilitation the against was he that xplained

) , SlobodnaEvropa, 57

23.03.2012,

ć hi cie, s poe t the to opposed as crimes, their bt onl but , Rehabilitationof ć

had no control committed control no had ć y the countries of the the of countries the y CorrectingHistory: Will

had collaborated with with collaborated had

Draţa cal facts, cal : Croats Croats : d not not d ć ,

CEU eTD Collection 137 136 critiques.address the Serbia of relations the Mihailovi If Ustasha. the and Chetniks the between difference the on insisting and Ustasha the rehabilitating for Croatia accusing were Movement Renewal Serbian the from came and critiques Croatian to were given responses only The Serbia. in level official the at addressed from history 20 the in society and Dragiša Mihailoviof rehabilitation the during that claims Hehistoriography. critical against violence of act an it calling processes, imp to leads implementation orindependent past workuse ofthe ofthe Mihailov of case However, the in government. the serving and motivated politically were courts the that and Serbia in War Second the from Worldwar criminals causing decreasingprogressively a of annulled, number warned also He rehabilitations. the before much

May "Milivoj Quislings:SerbiaIs Disowning Antifascism Lj udmila Cvetkovi udmila

the state officials of Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro, they were not were they Montenegro, and Herzegovina and Bosnia Croatia, of officials state the 137 Cost us a lotusa Cost Although the critiques about the rehabilitation of Drag of rehabilitation the about critiques the Although Kulji to Similarly As stated in this chapter, the reactions were the strongest in 2012, because it was was it because 2012, in strongest the were reactions the chapter, this in stated As

Cvetkovi .

Bešlin

: Nenaučena Lekcija iz Istorije nas Moţe Puno Koštati” Puno Nenaučenaiznas Moţe LekcijaIstorije ( ) ć , ć , Dnevnik , " Momčilo

Rehabilitacija Kvislinga: Da liKvislinga: RehabilitacijaDa seSrbija Odriče Antifašizma?”( th

with the countries in the region and the Serbian officials would have toofficialshave Serbianwould the region and the in countries thewith

century was written, which has nothing to do with real investigated real with do to nothing has which written, was century

, 14.12.2013, , ć Milivoj , osing false perception about certain historical events, people and and people events, historical certain about perception false osing

ć Jankovi , and in the court decisions to rehabilitatePavle to decisions thecourt in and , i ć , he stated that he could not define if it was about political about was it if define not could he that stated he , www.dnevnik.rs/print/63438 ć Bešlin ?)

and others, a quasi a others, and

court until court ć

is to be rehabilitated, it could cause problems in in problems cause could it rehabilitated, be to is *** 58 describes that the Rehabilitation Act and its its and Act Rehabilitation the that describes

and some individuals, where the main topics main the where individuals, some and

that the post the that

final decision was made - historiography of Yugoslav state Yugoslavstate of historiography , last , accessedMay 2014 on 8, oljub Mihailovi oljub - Not Learned from Not Lecture History war court decisions had been been had decisions court war Rehabilitationof 136 ć KaraĎorĎev

were were

coming

ić , CEU eTD Collection Mihailovi about articles any publish longer no day, every almost topic this on articles published and as such newspapers the difficul more and slower court the of work the made which initiatives, different of appeals and actions the are this for explanations the of One proceedings. two between passed year a that happened proceedi the years two first the In changed. also has process court The focus. media the which from disappears case, it that rehabilitation caused the of duration long very a by explained also be could which for media of interest The lawsuits. through lectures, public protests, with rehabilitation the fight trying to been society,within civil is contestation left onlyof the initiativeshave the 2014, aspect where and Mihailovi when time of matter a was it that expected ć

and his rehabilitation.and t but also the mentioned lack of a positive attention of media for this case. Even case. this for media of attention positive a of lack mentioned the also but t Večernje g wr shdld ey fe, u sne 02 i hs even has it 2012, since but often, very scheduled were ngs

Novosti, which were obviously supporting the rehabilitation rehabilitation the supporting obviously were which Novosti, the court process has also decreased since 2012, since decreased also has process court the 59

would be rehabilitat be would and publishing and ed. During 2013 2013 During ed.

books and and books CEU eTD Collection 140 139 138 RTS showed and the series financed broadcaster public national Worldthe Second and the War included of revisionswere serious later analyzed be will which textbook history the approved Education of play theatre the promoting People'sLiberation the War names new got after named Serbia around streets of hundreds where names, street the changing of initiative was there government, Duringthis Serbia. Partyof Socialist the Party Radicaland Serbian (DOS)Serbia of Opposition Democratic the by formed was parliament the in majority governm the andParties3.1. Politics: TheHistory Political Chronology will focus exampleschapter Dragoljub onthe and concerning Mihailovi Chetniks the the importantly pr media and most textbookspractices, commemoration commissions, of establishment level, official the at supported or initiated are which actions these the and Law Mihailovi Veteran 2004 of the rehabilitation the by by followed Chetniks Acts Rehabilitation the and Partisans the of equalization

Democracy,Social DemocraticUnion,Civil aforAllianceof Movement Serbia,Democratic Serbia, Christia includingCoalition DemocraticNewthe DemocraticParty (DS), thePartySerbia of Serbia (DSS), (NS), (Belgrade:za Zavod Nikoli Kosta MilanRadanovi Sandţak ChapterIII.TheCultureOfficial of Remembrance the on The first government under which the changes in the history politics took place was place took politics history the in changes the which under government first The The Serbia. in politics history restorative the of aspect one only represents Legislation During the two mandates of the government of Vojislavof government the of mandates two the During n Democratic Party of Serbia (DHSS), Leaguen DemocraticPartyofofSocial Serbia (DHSS), of Democrats VojvodinaSocial (LSV), ć

DemocraticParty, etc.Democratic Centrer , reflect the other top the, reflect other ent under the leadership of Zoran of leadership the under ent ć

et al. et ć , “

Istorijska Politika u Srbiji posle 2000” ( Srbiji2000”Politika Istorijskau posle Istorija za 3. i 4.Razredza3. Istorija Gimnazije Udţbenike YugoslavArmy intheHomeland

No , 2002) ,

- Đ down actions of the Serbian state. with state. will chapter This Serbian deal down actions ofthe enerala, enerala,

Ravnogorska 139 made by made 60 . The Minister for Culture,Branislavfor Minister . The

ĐinĎić

( History for the 3 the Historyfor Č itanka itanka Historicalin2000 Policy afer Serbia a

book book from 2001 to 2003, during which the which during 2003, to 2001 from

many Chetniks, such as Dragoljub Dragoljub as such Chetniks, many in 2002. in by

rd Vuk Koštunica

and4

Drašk th

Grade of HighGrade of School ović 140

(DSS), from 2004 2004 from (DSS), , where the first the where , . The Ministry Ministry The . ojects. This ), Lečić 297 ć .

138

, was,

, the the , )

an an CEU eTD Collection 142 141 they but principle, in rehabilitation on law the supported socialists the that explained SPS ago years 70 than more from something correcting in than cost, would bread much how or day next the open be would factories many how that, in interested more Nikoli voted Serbia of Party Socialist The against. 21 and favor in voted 107 representatives, present 130 of Out it. others the votedand favor changes in ofthe Radic Serbian the Serbia, Democratic of PartyDemocratic Party, Democraticthe the Social Party, while the and Serbia of Party Socialist the were against were which parties by Voj moderated proceeding the at against 24 and it for voting representatives 176 year, with same the December in Assembly National Serbian the in adopted were Veteranchanges Law. The Mov Renewal Serbian The 2004. in parliament Serbian the in votes of majority the won Partisans the with was Ministry approved by the during of Education mandate. this te criticized Another 2005. in gathering Gora Ravna the in participated government changes the During the in time, this VeteranLaw Rehabilitation and Act the adopted and were TadiBoris Move Renewal Serbian the and Serbia /New Serbia of Party Democratic The Party, Democratic The Party, Radical Serbian the by formed was majority parliament's 2008, to

http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2004&mm=12&dd=21&nav_id=158391 " accessedMay2014 on 29, Rehabilitation Act), "PodeljeniRehabilitaciji" StavoviPredloguZakona o o Opinions (Divided Proposalthe About ofthe May2014 29, Č etnicima Isto Sto Isto etnicima ć islav Mihailovi islav h rcgiin f h Cenk a a atfsit oeet n ter equalization their and movement antifascist an as Chetniks the of recognition The The 2006 Rehabilitation Act also had the majority of the parliament voting in favor of of favorvoting in parliament the majoritythe Rehabilitationof 2006 had also ActThe , who was at the time the head of the SRS group in the parliament, said that he was he that said parliament, the in group SRS the of head the time the at was who , ć

(DS) became the President of Serbia in 2004, which position he had until 2012. until had he position which 2004, in Serbia of President the became (DS)

ement (SPO) and New Serbia (NS) filed the proposal for changes of the the of changes for proposal the filed (NS) Serbia New and (SPO) ement gis te a ad h Srin aia Pry a nt rsn. Tomislav present. not was Party Radical Serbian the and law the against

i Partisans),(TheSamethe thePartizanima", to to Chetniks as SlobodnaEvropa, ć , the grandson of Dragoljub Mihailovi Dragoljub grandsonof the ,

04.04.2006, 141 61 . http://www.slobodna

and a member of the SPO. The the SPO.of The member a and evropa.mobi/a/664932.html

142 B92 . Ivica . , 21.12.2004, , , last , accessedon Dačić al Party Party al , last last , xtbook

of the the of ment. ment. CEU eTD Collection 143 for search the and then by archives investigating Dragoljub the for search the in together joined commissions two These Tombs).Secret the for Commission State The text: further (in 1944 Marking Findingand Secret AllTombs Remains the with of Execution the of Mihailovi CircumstancesDragoljub the of Investigation the for Commission State The W Second the with deal which commissions two established has Serbia of Republic The past. problematic the overcoming and reconciliation to lead to 3.2.Commissions Ministryof the ofJusti jurisdiction the under is it and Serbia of Republic the of Government the by 2009 in founded was 1944 Liberation the after Killed Those of Remains the with Tombs Secret All Marking Radovanovi Slobodan Prosecutor Mihailovi Dragoljub of Execution the of Circumstances the of Investigation the for Commission State Mihailović's Dragoljub of circumstances the the investigating mandate, for commissions this the During established etc. government SPS NS, DSS, by followed SRS, and DS by formed was would represent it so revision forthem ofhistory Partisans, and Chetniks the of equalization legal the of consequence logical a as it considered

Ibid

The truth commissions are an important step of transitional justice which is supposed is which justice transitional of step important an are commissions truth The Durin ć

was established by the Government of Serbia, with the Deputy of the State Public Public State the Deputyof the with Serbia, of Government bythe established was

g the government led by Mirko Cvetkovi Mirko by led government the g et ad erhn te rvs f t of graves the searching and death Mihailović's

ce. a etbihd n uy 09 olwd y h Sae omsin for Commission State the by followed 2009 July in established was

et fini death

Mihailović's hd h sac o nw nomto n ouet and documents in information new for search the shed as president. The State Commission for Finding and and Finding for Commission State The president. as 62 Mihailović's 143

remains belongs to the field of work of the the of work of field the to belongs remains oe xctd nte post the in executed hose .

(DS), the majority in the parliament the in majority the (DS),

of Those Killed after the Liberation the after Killed of Those

grave in 2011. The Commission The 2011. in grave orld War or the post the Waror orld - 1945 years. The years. 1945 - war years. war CEU eTD Collection 145 of identification possible and 144 discoveries new announcing statements with interest media raised Commission the of members The media. Serbian the in reports sensationalist significant especially Mihailovi Dragoljub of Death the of Circumstances the of Investigationthe for Commission the work, two year death.Duringthe his about facts new sup was it and started case rehabilitation the before newidentity a changes economygraves memory the the historical mark newthe ofmemory in and often and "moral Hevictim. it economy calls grave", graves ofthe have where im an of proof symbolic Mihailović's a be would remains authentic the that adds He martyrology. faceless a than convincing more is victim key a marking where patriot Serbian the against violence Mihailović's controversia media dominant the it in that character warns martyr He discourse". a gained already has which personality his Radanovitrial. the after shot washe that known is it process,because rehabilitation his effecton an had have If ago.years 60 than more killed someone State Commission Secret forthe Tombs, for can provide also it which

http://www.fpi.rs/blog/institucionalna 2011”( MilanRadanovi 10, 2014 10, 26.10.2012, TodorKulji 2009 - h qetos r why are questions The h cmiso rsacig h crusacs of circumstances the researching commission The 2011/ Institutionalfor GraveMediathe andSearch of General Dragoljub Mihailovi

liberation the after died who actors historical l , last , acces ć suffering and it would turn into a place of remembrance on the greatest Serbian greatest the on remembrance of place a into turn would it and suffering www.danas.rs/dodaci/vikend/klasno_drus , " grave and his rehabilitation as the most important testimony of communist communist of testimony important most the as rehabilitation his and grave 145 ć KlasnobezDruštvo Klasne Borbe”(

ć argues "finding that .

, InstitucionalnaiGrobomza Potraga Medijska Mihailovića GeneralaDragoljuba2009 sed on May 22, 2014 Maysed22, on e informatio new

state a ol initiate could - i - medijska Mihailović's n

, although the Commission's work was followed by by followed was work Commission's the although , would Mihailović's - potraga 63

ClassClass SocietyStruggle without

launch launch search for the remains of other prominent prominent other of remains the for search tvo_bez_klasne_borbe.26.html

remains would permanently monumentalize would permanently monumentalize remains - za - posed to help the process by providing providing by process the help to posed grobom and finance the search for a grave of of grave a for search the finance and

remains had been found, it would not not would it found, been had remains ć

- did not find his remains or any any or remains his find not did Mihailović's generala 144 Kulji . - dragoljuba equipment. ć

ć , lastaccessed on , April es h sac for search the sees et ws founded was death , 2009 , ) , - portant place in in portant place Mihailovića Danas - 2011

, ) , - - CEU eTD Collection 148 147 these of activities 146 following The 2011. for search the April on focused were of Commissions report its in novelties significant the Mihailovi of Circumstances the of Investigation for Commission the for search Commission the of members other and Homen of statements optimistic bythe supported also was this and Mihailovi of burial and death of place the about information since 1946 opened been photogr of Mihailović's consisting was archive the that saying Homen, Slobodan by confirmed later was which media, in appeared this first about discovery news The buried. was he where place the about information with together be, post the 1946 the sources about substantial gathered commission the and researchers to accessible not normally archives to historians the that was commission this of contribution notable Mihailović's

" memorial History,Miladin Statethe Secretary inMinistryofJustice, the Slobodawere Rad Bojan otkriven London " www.pressonlin Grobnice Svuda po Srbiji Grobnicepo Svuda TajniDraţinoj ( Dosije o OtkrivenLondonu” Smrti u h nx dsoey a fud n h Biih rhvs where archives, British the in found was discovery next The about information including archive an was discovery alleged first Commission's The The State Commission for the Secret Tombs led by historian historian by Tombs led Secret the for Commission State The - Dimitrijevićand war trials and executions, where photos of photos where executions, and trials war ) - ć , Mihailović's u

Politika complex at Oplenac an at complex - in 2011, after the commission focused on 2011,incommission focused the after Londonu.lt.html

148 death was found and that it was completely new, because the archive had not not had archive the because new, completely was it that and found was death ean, u ms o t of most but remains, . However,. contain not did British the archives e.rs/info/politika/67957/grobnice Milošević ,23.06.2010, ovanović

Kosta Nikoli Kosta

grave or new insight on the circumstancesgrave onthe ofhis death. ornewinsight trial. 147 ", , director ofthe director , Archivesof Yugoslavia,Miladin Gavrilovi , last accessed on May 20, 2014 lastaccessedMay20, on , , DeputyProsecutor RepublicofPublicof, theSl Serbia,the of (Graves Everywhere inSerbia),Everywhere(Graves . archive non The be turned to out

http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Drustvo/Tajni

d Dragand Vlahovi ć , expert associatesexpert , Commission.of Other membersthe than them,the heir announcements turned out to be false. The only only The false. be to out turned announcements heir Momčilo - svuda ć 64 , historian , Mihailović's RecordTheSecret About

ps n cmlt dcmnain about documentation complete and aphs Pavlovi - po -

Mihailović's

srbiji.html Press Mihailović's and ć , director of the Institute for Contemporarydirector Institute of the , , 07.06.2009, 07.06.2009, , journalistfrom newspaperthe Politika

- remains at different locations in in locations different at remains existing. , lastaccessed January2014 on , 20,

any information concerning any information the ć

146 was supposed to be revealed revealed be to supposed was

execution were supposed to to supposed were execution

death had not providednot any had death dosije were provided with access access with provided were Execution of Dragoljub Dragoljub of Execution

Draţa's SrĎan

- o - Drazinoj ć , managerofthe ,

Death Discovered inDeathDiscovered Cvetkovi

obodan Homen,obodan

the significant significant the - smrti ć -

joined joined

CEU eTD Collection 152 151 150 149 members' Commission other the confirmed Homen assumptions, saying that Slobodan media. in euphoria scattered ashes their cremated and been had executed those Mihailovi Prosecutor Public the to Alt left was everything and done was police and Commission truth" the hide to order s executed been where location the at remains the of discovery "the that saying Mihailovi to so public, assumptions their made discovery the about opinion expert's without an for media waiting in published was news this and cuffs hand as used been have to assumed were which wires metal and bones human found Commissions The others. with buried been Mihailovi where grave mass a was it that thought members Commission the which of Belgrade, attention. by was followed which also media

VeljkoMilladinovic, " Adi”( NIN 2014;Paunkovi M. http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Drustvo/Tajna Milan Ibid online.com/Vesti/Srbija/145222/Iskopane " Years: hough some of the former Yugoslav officials said that it was impossible that it could be be could it that impossible was it that said Yugoslav officials former the of some hough Iskopane KostiIskopaneĐeneralove”( ie fu mtr wee ee t nn pol wr bre, oehr with together buried, were people traces. the destroy to attempts were there that show bones nineburnt and lime slaked of to seven p are those that proof where a is It handcuffs. three meters of grave mass four a is It thrown. times were shot those where hole a th was there that of Circumstances the of Mihailovi Dragoljub Investigation the for Commission [h]

, 3156,23.06.2011, , 14; VeljkoMilladinovi The most prominent discovery was found at Ada Ciganlija in Belgrade in June 2011, June in Belgrade in Ciganlija Adaat found was discovery prominent most The MisterySolved After65 Years:FoundDraţain e Č Draţa

etnik, " etnik, ć is happy that the results of the search confirmed the evidence found by the the by found evidence the confirmed search the of results the that happy is , because , YugoslaviaNuremberg processesthe where of example the followed had ć

, because, according to the witnesses, he was last to be killed. He continued by continued He killed. be to last was he witnesses, the to according because, , Found inFound Ada TajnanaGrobnica AdiCiganl uggested that they had been not moved, but it had been a false information in in informationfalse a been had it but moved, not been had they that uggested ć , " Misterija Rešena Posle 65 Godina:MisterijanaRešenaPosle65 PronaĎenDraţa Adi”( Kopanjem ka Nacionalnom Pomirenju”Kopanjem( Nacionalnomka 150

) ć . Cvetkovi .

, that the prison was at the place shown by the witnesses and and witnesses the by shown place the at was prison the that , TheGeneral'sExcavate Bones

SrĎan ć -

kosti said at the press conference later that the work of the the of work the that later conference press the at said - iji”( grobnica

ć Cvetkovi - , " deneralove risoners who were shot and the found tracesfound the and shot were who risoners Secret Secret Tomb at AdaCiganlija MisterijanaGodina:RešenaPosle65 PronaĎen Draţa 65

Ada -

na - ć ) Adi , lastaccessed May 2014 on , 21, , 149

said that the remains probably belonged belonged probably remains the that said Press d) - . Those who participated in the in participated who Those .

Ciganliji.lt.html

, By NationalDiggingthe to Reconciliatio VestiOnline , 1960, 19.06.2011, 1960, , 4; 152 , it did not havea not did it , Draţa , 20.06.2011 , , lastaccessedMay2 on , ) ,

Politika and his comrades had comrades his and MisterySolved After65 of Execution e

, , 19.06.2011, , http://www.vesti

n effect on the the effecton n

search search ć 1, 1,

ha n), 151 -

d . CEU eTD Collection 153 charge in Ministers five gathers Board The Culture. for Minister the by Wars led Liberation the of Tradition of Preservation the for Serbia of Government the of Board Organizational Ministry forCulture. and Serbia of Republic the of Government the by financed and supported first the was 2005 in celebration the but 1990, in started gatherings These Homeland. the in YugoslavArmy Mihailovi Dragoljub when 1941, May 3.3.Commemorations whregime Yugoslav the condemning time same the at Mihailović, Dragoljub of victimization the was beginning the as time same the at Yugoslav the by executions the about stories the of repetition the with media Serbian the in work their of presence daily post the in insight new a provide or documents new for search the on commissions discovery.the of the work after weeks The few a Belgrade in University Medical the of Forensics for Institute the from came human even not were bones the that

Miha Novosti, VojislavaSpasojevi the witnesses. the Their families deserve know to truth. the end generals and state the of representative highest because the bonesbelong, these who determineto exactly to important is It The news denying the claims that it could have been been have could it that claims the denying news The ilovića Ministryoffice of the The for 13 the of anniversary celebrate year every May in Gora Ravna at gatherings The

22.07.2011, ich not only not people,ich but also killed letexecuted those not did have marked graves. , lastaccessed 2014 , May22, on ć , " http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/aktuelno.69.html:334952

DNK VodiMihailoviDraţe do

regime had an important effect, especially that it was happening happening was it that especiallyeffect, important an had regime

Mihailović's - war events and and events war of Mihailović’s of

Culture which was in charge of the organizationchargetheinthe was waswhichof Culture

ih gop f fies an officers of group a with

grave 66 ća”(

ed up in this mass grave, according to according grave, mass this in up ed

Mihailović's did not come to any important results or or results important any to come not did rehabilitation court case. case. court rehabilitation DNK Leads to Leadsto DNK 153

Mihailović's trial and death. However, the the However, death. and trial Draţa

Mihailovi slir fre the formed soldiers d - DNK

remains, proving proving remains, Its - ć vodi ", ",

main purpose main Večernje - do - Draze

th -

CEU eTD Collection 156 155 154 an representative state a as there present was he that was celebration 2005 the at problem Gora,the Ravna at year everymovement appearing Chetnik the of supporter open th in Serbia of torments the in loser or winner no was there that and shame" without movement Mihailovi general about itself to truth the admits it when only world the 1 of front in speech Minister Vuk Subjela was in put statue 2008 in since years 60 110 commemorating the commemorating 2003 in built one is Mihailovibeen have there that noted be to has it Serbia, of Republic the of territory the in memorials and monuments the a monuments building monuments and memorials existing of for preservation initiatives about deciding war, liberation the of traditions the of preservation the promoting and institutions other with cooperation commemorations, and Second a War the than War World First the on I,King ofKing deaths commemorations ofthe Petar more focused been has Board the of rel of education, e "brother e

23.07.2009, 23.07.2009, JovanaGligorijevi Službeni Forming"Decision forBoard the about Preservation the of of TraditionsLiberationof Serbian Wars", last accessed last May2014 on 20, http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2005&mm=05&dd=15&na 15000 Visitors " Pred Pred VišePosetilaca15000 Odrţanod Drašković d h ms poiet ate. h Bad s n hre f h ofca porm of program official the of charge in is Board The battles. prominent most the nd h gvrmn represen government The of

Glasnik of the Republic of Serbia the of Glasnik of Republic

- Culture and Vojislav and Culture killing war" from 1941 to 1945 to 1941 from war" killing http://www.vreme.com/cms/view.php?id=877757 ) wo a a te ie Minister time the at was who , , igion, defense, work and social politicsigion, worksocial veterans. years In and defense, recent work the B92 ć , Momir , T 5 000 people, saying that "Serbia will be truly recognized in Europe and Europe in recognized truly be will "Serbia that saying people, 000 5 ,

urudi

ć statues erected since the Board was formwasBoard the since erected statues Mihailović's 155 , " Vukčević tatives were present at the 2005 Ravna Gora celebration: celebration: Gora Ravna 2005 the at present were tatives DraţenjeSrbije”( .

Ravnogorski Sabor” ( RavnogorskiSabor”

,br. 38/97,46/2001,46/2004 i 71/2007 , the Minister for Diaspora. Vuk Diaspora. for Minister the , 156

67 death was built in Lapovo in 2006 and another and 2006 in Lapovo in built was death . . Although Vuk

of DrazificationofSerbia th

oeg far, rgn Kojadinovi Dragan Affairs, Foreign 154 anniversary of of anniversary Aleksandar . As the Board gives a final decision on decisionon final a gives Board the . As Ravna Gora GatheringRavna inFront ofMoreGora Than , lastaccessed May 2014 on , 20, Drašković

I, generals of the First generals ofthe WorldI, v_category=11&nav_id=168465 ) Mihailović's , Vreme

ed. In Ivanjica, thereInIvanjica, ed.

had always been an been always had ć , No. 968, No. ,

Drašković n an Gora Ravna and d Minister Minister d

birth, one one birth,

gave a a gave ć , the the , nd of ,

CEU eTD Collection 158 157 Victory the of Day the after right was which celebration, Gora Ravna the of because fascists with together fought had who those with together celebration a have would which world the SPS of Dačić Ivica event. Gora Ravna the for support official the opposed time, the at Party Radical Serbian the in was who Tomislav Nikolić and Serbia of Party Socialist the Also,this. with agree not did TadicBoris repre some idea, this supported Plus G17 and (DSS) Serbia of Party Democratic the While parties. political Serbian the among gathering Gora if react, and carefully necessary, very wit Montenegro and Serbia in developments the follow would Croatiathat said Sanader does. wayhe same as the movementperceive this which forces also woul he that out pointed He movement. Chetnik the rehabilitate to attempts any and event this condemns government Croatian the that explaining Assembly, National Croatian the in celebration Gora Ravna Montenegro. and HisSerbia office released statement saying the that distanced themselves celebration, this from was solely a saying it issue. that Serbian Montenegro from officials party. The political his only representing not and Affairs Foreign

Ibid tschetnik Movemen " Zagrebund BelgradStreiten fe te hti gteig t an Gr wih a atvl supported, actively was which representatives Gora prominent some where and Ravna government Serbian the by at out carried and organized gathering Chetnik the after and Montenegro under the given Montenegroforeseeable the in and under and future circumstances Serbia to visit planned his for preparationswith continue to conditions no are there

The Prime Minister of Croatia Croatia of Minister Prime The the caused This hr ws o osnu aot h saes atcpto ad iacn o te Ravna the of financing and participation state's the about consensus no was There - bewegung/a t) , Deutsche Welle h reintroducing visa the system

- f h gvrmn priiae, h Peiet Mesi President the participated, government the of 1589409

P d keep the relations with Serbia and Montenegro because there are there because Montenegro and Serbia with relations the keep d eiet f rai Sjpn Mesi Stjepan Croatia of resident , 18.05.2005, 18.05.2005, , Über - 1

, lastaccessed , May2014 on 20, stated that Serbia and Montenegro would be the only state in in state only the be would Montenegro and Serbia that stated TschetnikBewegung” ( http://www.dw.de/zagreb v Sndr rtczdte tt' priiain n the in participation state's the criticized Sanader Ivo 158 68 .

ZagrebBelgradeFightingand About Chetnikthe sentatives of the Democratic Party of of Party Democratic the of sentatives

- und ć

- to cancel cancel to belgrad

- streiten his planned visit to to visit planned his ć -

%C3%BCber hns that thinks 157 .

- CEU eTD Collection 160 159 Party Democratic Movement, the and Security Information The Ravna to Agency (BIA) came e July in Church Orthodox Serbian the by and Gora Ravna at held death Mihailović's of commemorations also been have there 2011 Ravna Goraat year every the at Party Democratic the commemorations. of representatives also were there but Drašković, support statement no also but celebration Gora Ravna the from state the separating statement official no was there because celebrations following the of any financed state the whether known not is It parties. political suchprobably level, r Croatian celebration at the to due ideological, religious,their ornational qualification” political because happen, to has descendants their and Chetniks the and Partisans the enemies, former of reconciliation “the that saying Serbia, in movements antifascist two the thesisof the supported He publicly others. amongspeaking, Presiden the where 2005 May in Belgrade in Sava Centar in both finance should state the or Chetniks the by celebrated was which day the finance not should upris of day the as celebrated Partisans the which day the finance to want not did state the if that added He itself. support financial the not and citizens the among differences against

" www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html " accessed last May2014 on 20, http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2005&mm=05&dd=10&nav_category=12&nav_id=168150 ČetničkiRuhuu Drţave”Praznik ( Pobeda za CezaPobeda 159 .

led i 20, h Srin oenet i nt atcpt i te an Gora Ravna the in participate not did government Serbian the 2006, in Already 60 the of celebration a was There eie te niesr o te onain f h uolvAm i te Homeland, the in YugoslavArmy the of foundation the of anniversary the Besides

Fasc s. ioi epand ht h bget rbe ws ceto o ideological of creation a was problem biggest the that explained Nikolić ism. li(Victory Svet” for the WholeWorld”, Similarly to Drašković, Velimir Ilić from the New Serbia has been present been has Serbia New the VelimirDrašković,from Ilićto Similarly

, regardless if he has a government position ornot. position government , regardlesshas a he if

n i. h ol gvrmn rpeettv i 20 ws Vuk was 2006 in representative government only The it. ing TheinState'sChetnikHolidaythe Clothes very year. In 2009, a delegation of the Serbian Renewal Serbian the of delegation a 2009, In year. very th

Serbia needs all her children today, regardless of regardless today, children her all needs Serbia anniversary of the victory over fascism organized organized fascism over victory the of anniversary 69

VečernjeNovosti, , lastaccessed May 2014 on , 25, eactions and the among and eactions opposition the 160

08.05.2005, 08.05.2005, .

o Sri Brs ai was Tadić Boris Serbia of t ) , B92 ,10

.05.2005,

ing, then it it then ing, , CEU eTD Collection 162 161 without publicfor textbooks call a authors new write to opportunity the got they However, 2000. before war the on perspective the of historiograon influence no supportersbut had historians these that explains Second role the "historical in World cleansing" their and Chetniks a careers to ofthe War. She p in past Stojanovi Chetniks. the of representation positive very a creating and Partisans the criticizing WorldWar,by Second the on perspective of change movement. antifascist another as depicted Chetniks, the of representation positive a with together period, Yugoslav the houses orauthors. altern no with grade and subject each for textbook one is there that meaning textbooks, on monopoly a has state The state. the of politics history official the representing Sport, and Education for Ministry the by approved and house publishing Post 3.4.inthe TheChetniks Nedi Mihailović, Churc present Minister Marko's SrĎan Srećković, the forDiaspora, Saint where Belgrade, the was in Church service religious 63 the on statue Mihailović's on flowers lay to Gora

1941 in1941 History Textbooksin Serbia DubravkaStojanović, JovanaGligorijevi h is however not a recent phenomenon, because they have been organized for for organized been have they because phenomenon, recent a not however is h 161 During Milošević's rule, history textbooks textbooks history rule, Milošević's During issued are Serbia in schools high and elementary for textbooks The ost Te ommrto srie o Daojb ialvć n h Srin Orthodox Serbian the in Mihailović Dragoljub for service commemoration The . - 2000 Serbian textbooks came came groupyoung textbooks their a from 2000 Serbian of who devoted historians ć conducted by three priests. At the same day, there was a commemoration in in commemoration a was day, samethere priests.the At three by conducted

and Ljoti and , Momir , Turudi " Revizijau 1941 UdţbenicimaSrbiji” u Revizije: ( Istorije

since since beginningthe nineties. ofthe

- itr txbos ulse atr 00 et ute i the in further went 2000 after published textbooks History ć 2000Textbooks ) , " , 158 , DraţenjeSrbije”(

162 .

DrazificationofSerbia kept glorifying kept

rd ć

anniversary of his death. There was a a was There death. his of anniversary

argues that the interpretations of the the of interpretations the that argues

atives from other publishing other from atives

Tito and the Partisans from Partisans the and Tito )

RevisionRevision:ofthe phy or the change the phyor by the state state the by CEU eTD Collection 167 166 165 164 163 Chetn Allies the of plans the endangered seriously it that and Chetniks the against plans and interests military their and served forces German with collaboration Partisans' collaboration Chetnik the justifying emphasizing however information, this included book bourgeoisie" call were slogans whose revolution, social losses prevent to order in Germans, to information false giving with secretly it doing and uprising" the for base be the of imprisonment of equipment, collectingcivilians, other organizing and arms "prevention cities the as described are goals Chetniks' The movements. first the haveto and startedantifascist with Serbia, betray resistancein but civilians be relations the of interpretation the revision: to subject were which textbooks these in issues respectively 2006 and 2002 in published and authors sch elementary

tween the Chetniks and the Partisans, collaboration and the Chetniks' crimes against against crimes Chetniks' the and collaboration Partisans, the and Chetniks the tween Kosta Nikolićal. Kosta et in1941 History Textbooksin Serbia Dubra 8 the (Belgrade:za Zavod Nikolićal. Kosta et 154 Nikolićal. Kosta et Ibid 141 k olbrto wt Iain ws ht t a a etr pin hn naig n fights in engaging than option better a was it that was Italians with collaboration ik

th In the 2002 book there was no mention of collaboration, but after critiques, the 2006 the critiques, after but collaboration, of mention no was there book 2002 the In opposite two as Partisans the and Chetniks the describes book school high 2002 The 20 the with dealing textbooks Twohistory

vkaStojanović, 164 Grade of ElementaryGradeof School I bt txbos te htis r dsrbda rpeetn Srin interests Serbian representing as described are Chetniks the textbooks, both In . 166 the collaboratio the . os n 3 and ools

Istorija za 8. Razred za8. Istorija Osnovne( Škole i 4.Razredza3. Istorija Gimnazije(H i 4.R za3. Istorija Udţbenike "" 165 Revizija Revizije: 1941 u UdţbenicimaSrbiji”Revizijau u Revizije:1941 ( Istorije

. The Partisans' goals are explained as not only liberation, but also a a also but onlyliberation, not as explained are goals Partisans' The . rd

n 4 and n , 2002); Kosta Nikolićal. 2002);Kosta , et

of the Partisans and occupiers. The textbook implies that the that implies textbook The occupiers. and Partisans the of ) ) , (Belgrade:za Zavod , 159 , azredGimnazije th

grade of high schools, written by the same group of of group same the by written schools, high of grade

71 n piaiy o "ih aant h traitor the against "fight for primarily ing

( History for the 3 the Historyfor th History for the 8 the Historyfor

istory for the 3 the for istory Udţbenike century are the books for the 8 the for books the are century Istorija za 8. za8. RazredIstorija Osnovne( Škole 163 Soaoi ietfe tre main three identifies Stojanović . , 2006) , rd rd th

and4 and4 Grade of ElementarySchool

and villages which would villagesand which th th 167

RevisionRevision:ofthe Grade of HighGrade of Schools HighGrade of School . The justification of justification The . ed byed the Allies. th History for for History

grade of grade ) )

CEU eTD Collection among 1999, other things 173 172 171 170 169 168 analysi thorough a conducted who Stojanović, contain. they issues the all with state, the of policy historical 20 about learn Serbia in post the of content the in problems t order supporters,in their and Partisans the fightingagainst only were who Chetniks the about section short by a followed is people. This amongthe ideology their and created Partisans the th in detail in elaborated are addressed not are civiliansagainst crimes the but communists, purpose a with before 1944 collaboration textbook 2006 the in put was forces, Nedi of followers the with collaboration Chetnik the implies Partisans,which the against unification the about part the that Stojanovićexplains political ofthe ide and thatbecause there was nounification, book claims Ljoti and ab and Italianagainstthat them the occupation Ustasha than better wouldthe be o extinguish Serbia communism in

andoning the Chetniks at the end of the war caused the unification of the Chetnik, Nedi Chetnik, the of unification the caused war the of end the at Chetniks the andoning

Kosta Nikolićal. Kosta et 268 2009), in DubravkaStojanović," 157 Ibid, 153 Ibid, 177 Nikolićal. Kosta et

the Serbian History Serbian the Textbooks

h ol cnet hr te hti cie ae etoe ae hs against those are mentioned are crimes Chetnik the where context only The and Allies the by Partisans the to given support the that explains textbook 2006 The only the notWorld SecondWar are the of events the and Partisans and Chetniks The Very problematic are also the interpretation of the Yugoslav wars, Kosovo and NATO bombing in bombing NATO and Kosovo wars, Yugoslav the of interpretation the also are problematic Very ć 173

forces together with German with together andforces Partisans against units Bulgarian the . Beside the fact that all pupil all that fact the Beside .

century history from these textbooks, they are also representing the official the representing also are they textbooks, these from history century s of Serbian textbooks, explains that the Serbian textbooks went far from from far went textbooks Serbian the that explains textbooks, Serbian of s Istorija Razred za8. Istorija Osnovne( Škole Godina Okupacije: 1945 u SrpskimGodinau Istorije”Okupacije:1945 ( Udţbenicima

170 za 3. i 4.Razredza3. Gimnazije . e 2002 book, describing the killings of civilians and fear which fear and civilians of killings the describing book, 2002 e

) ,in:

CultureRemembrance:1945 of - 172 2000 history textbooks, criticized by numerous historians historians numerous by criticized textbooks, history 2000 .

s in elementary and high schools in Serbia have to to have Serbia in schools high and elementary in s 72

( History for the 3 the Historyfor History for the 8 the Historyfor ć

n Ljoti and

, ed. Sulejman (Zagreb:Disput,ed. , Bosto, f hwn ta tee a no was there that showing of 171 ć rd

. The crimes of the Partisans Partisans the of crimes . The and German and Bulgarian Bulgarian and German and

and4 Grade of ElementarySchool, th

Grade of HighGrade of Schools YearofOccupation: 1945 ological differences. 168 .

169 . The 2002

186 ) , ć

CEU eTD Collection 175 174 in past" have should we and denazification decommunizatio had Germans "the that explained Krstić Allies' the betrayal. of victims the as them depicting Serbia, in movement resistance real only the first the and movement Gora Ravna the seri the of promotions of member a was Krstić project. television the for consultant expert an was Dimitrijević Bojan historian and title same the with book a author movement. The as resistance Chetniks the on focus the with Serbia in War World Second the following episodes 2013. series documentary the was first Čitanka The Ravnogorska Chetniks. the with specifically, more and War WorldSecond the with (RTS)dealing Serbia Television broadcaster,Radioof public Serbian Projects 3.5. Television textbooks school elementary in even included fact a is it that law, 2004 the in Chetniks and Partisans the of equalization the for grounds historical scientific the about him asked journalist a when Vojislavanswer the of example the gives She argument. political important an also but past, the of manipulation for space a became and purpose educational basic their

Serbia followingSerbia http://www.vreme.rs/cms/view.php?id=313416%E2%80%8E Nenad in1941 History Textbooksin Serbia DubravkaStojanović, 175

angrk Čitanka Ravnogorska s television two were There . RTS and Krstić's company announced that there would be a series about "red about series a be would there that announced Krstić'sRTScompany . and Grujičić 174 .

, " n and this series is a contribution to the decommunization of Serbian Serbian of decommunization the to contribution a is series this and n ČetniciiPočetnici”( Ravnogorska Čitanka Ravnogorska " es were organized by this movement. The series shows the Chetniks as Chetniks the shows series The movement. this byorganized were es RevizijaRevizije: f 200 of

ad h second, the and 2 a son n pi ad a 20 ad osse o eight of consisted and 2002 May and April in shown was ) , , 163 , Uglješa Chetniksand eries in the post the in eries

1941 u 1941 UdţbenicimaSrbiji”u ( Istorije

, beenyet. has not shown it but

Krstić, made the series of documentaries out of his of out documentaries of series the made Krstić, 73 Beginners),

an Gora Ravna - 2000 period financed and shown by the the by shown and financed period 2000 , last , accessedMay 2014 on 25,

Vreme , No. 591,02.05.2002, No. ,

started showing in November November in showing started RevisionRevision:ofthe

Koštunica

terror” terror”

gave

CEU eTD Collection 178 177 176 present for their important is whichpast,understand their peopleto Serbian help would series th explainedBajić Radoš reconciliation.national to leading thus people, Serbian among December in waswhich published 2013. happe not did premiere announced the and since Gora Ravna at Chetniks 13 on premiered 2014 January in announced Bajić, Radoš series, the of director and writer The war. whole the encompasses which trilogy a of part first the isaverage 120000euros, episode ofone of cost out episodes filmed The subsidies. state with Serbia, of citizens the by financed is broadcaster public a as RTS Studios. Contrast mad and RTS was of it cooperation but RTS on shown just not was series The the Chetniks. to refers also series the of name The released. was trailer the as soon as Chetniks the both" understanding of possibility off but side, other the or one glorify or favor not does series "[t]he that says series the of Facebookofficialpagethe of subtitle Srpska. The of Republic the in shown also were they S on time prime the during shown were episodes The Chetniks. the joins other the and Partisans the joins son one where family Serbian a of story central World a Second with the War Serbia of events in

" w http://mondo.rs/a651821/Zabava/Film/Uskoro " accessedMay2014 on 26, http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:472798 Ravna Gora i RavnaČekaGora Dalje( Istinu” Uskoro Film( Uskoro Gora” Ravna ww.facebook.com/ravnagora.tv So far, only ten episodes have been made and shown, following the events of 1941, as 1941, of events the followingshown, and made been have far,episodes Soonly ten th showing started RTS The The Ravna Gora Ravna th unday nights from November 2013 until January 2014 and besides Serbia, besides and 2014 January until 2013 November from nights unday

of May 2014, on the anniversary of the day when Mihailović gathered the gathered Mihailović when day the of anniversary the on 2014, May of

178

series was announced as having the purpose of ending the divisions divisions the ending of purpose the having as announced was series The Ravna Gora Movie TheRavnaGora Soon Hwvr tee a be n ifrain bu te oi ever movie the about information no been has there However, .

,lastaccessed May2014 on 24, series e Ravna Gora StiRavna Gora 176 , because the series faced serious critiques for glorifying for critiques serious faced series the because , an Gora Ravna

- Film llWaiting for the Truth 74 - Ravn

n. Bajić turned the series script into a book, a into script series the turned Bajić n. a ) - , which 90 000 comes from RTS from 90000comes which gora.html ht the that

Mondo n oebr 03 wih olw the follows which 2013, November in

, 15.01.2014, , , lastaccessedMay 2014 on 26, , an Gora Ravna - cost 1.6 cost Ravna ) , Večernje - gora ad iacd n the in financed and e

million euros and the the and euros million

- Novosti i - dalje

movie would be be would movie - , 11.01.2014, , ceka 177 - istinu .

ers the ers

at the the at , last , CEU eTD Collection 180 179 represented factshistorical are properly,gave credibility project. the to followed which reviews and statements historians' the However,projects. television historical for known not Gora series television Gora Ravna that significant is it series, the about criticisms many to opposed as and project the for broadcaster public the of support the Besides with. dealt be will Bosnia in activities their how seen be to is it and war the issues. controversial no with beginningof the with onlyengage far light, so shown episodes the that noted be to has However, it positive very a in Mihailović Dragoljub and them for Institute the and author the HistoryContemporary author's as the freedom. creative by justified were series the in mistakes historical The of interpretation the in freedom creative to contribution "the for award an received also Bajić Radoš facts. historical and content the on opinions expert offered which Arts, and Sciences of Academy Serbian Contempo for Institute the by supported was stigmatized unjustlybeen ideologically had who people Serbian the of part patriotic the to done injustices corre and misconceptions ideological demystifying been, had they how movements liberation GoraRavna and communist the represented it because future, and

http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Politika/418930/Istorija andisChetniks:the is That itwhyWhereis Serbia " miliona Gora Katarina accessed last May2014 on 26, Istorija jeijeiIstorijaPorazila Partizane Četnike:SrbijaZato TuJeste”( Gde

is a feature series where historical facts do not have to be respected and the author is author the and respected be to have not do facts historical where series feature a is was seen by more than two million people in Serbia, making it the most viewed viewed most the it making Serbia, in people million two than more by seen was ) Even if we accept that that accept we if Even , Politika - gledalaca.lt.html ĐorĎević and vilified and , 12.11.2013, , 180 an Gora Ravna , " . Also, unlike unlike Also, . Ravnu Goru GledaloRavnu Goru

recent Serbian history" from the Association of Playwrights of Serbia. Serbia. Playwrightsof of the Association history" from Serbian recent 179 , last accessed on May 26, 2014 lastaccessed May26, on ,

. Although the project does not belong to the documentary genre, it genre, documentary the to belong not does project . the Although http://www.politika.rs/rubrike/Drustvo/Ravnu

camn ta te wr wrig n h sre ad ht all that and series the on working were they that claiming , Ravna Gora Ravna

the engagement of the Chetniks in a bigger collaboration or collaboration bigger a in Chetniks the of engagement the angrk Čitanka Ravnogorska

Više Dvaod Miliona” ( -

je does rary History and the Balkanology Institute of the the of Institute Balkanology the Historyand rary ) - 75 , porazila Blic

not glorify the Chetniks, it certainly shows shows certainly it Chetniks, the glorify not ,11.11.2013,

- i - partizane

More ThanMore TwoMillion Watched Ravna hc ws documentary, a was which - History Defeated bothHistoryPartisans the Defeated i - cetnike - goru - gledalo -

zato tn tai historical tragic cting - je - - vise Srbija - od - tu - dva - gde - Ravna - jeste, CEU eTD Collection ongoing the of tendencies. aspect legal a and of act rehabilitation symbolic a legal represent the would that Mihailović Dragoljub so revised been already has Chetniks the of perception pub textbooks in representation positive their and Chetniks the glorifying projects television for support financial commemorations, the in antifascist by as an equal to followed movement Partisans, defined the state's participation the a have Chetniks The citizens. or parties political officials, the among consensus no is there when even standpoint, state official the show they because at, look Serbian bythe politics historythe in put efforts The

76 lished by the state. These actions show that the the that show actions These state. the by lished

***

state are important phenomena important are state ray en legally been lready

to to CEU eTD Collection of not did law lack The defined. the retribution financial are no and thesis, law the the in limitations in or instructions discussed as issues, These law. 2006 the of formulation law, how good, nomatter completely not did solve problem. the the of version new the so law rehabilition first the to according processed be to have 2011 sentenced or becaus killed were who all for possible is rehabilitation legal that except anything define not did which law 2006 the of problems the solves it it, by and retribution financial conditi the detail in defines Act Rehabilitation 2011 The Homeland. the Yugoslav in the Army of rehabilitation political completed already of light in rehabilitation legal of significance and Acts Rehabilitation the the Yugoslav place history central a Serbian hasin Partisans, had 2000. since politics to opposite Homeland, the Yugoslav in The Army state. the Yugoslof base historical the a represented and War World Second the of actors and of Yugoslaviadelegitimization events the of questioning and revision implies Tito,which and legis especially politics, history of rehabilitation. tool a be also can Legislation things. other among museums, and space public the in names changing events, commemoration and holidays official as such practices commemoration commissions, truth include can politics post all in present been has past communist the overcoming and terms to coming of purpose a with politics memory e of ideological or political reasons. However, all requests filed between 2006 and and 2006 between filed requests all However, reasons. political or ideological of e This research has tried to explain the probl the explain to tried has research This of purpose a with employed are politics history of practices different Serbia, In and history Restorative transition. of agents powerful are memory and History The issues whic issues The

h appear in the implementation of rehabilitation come from the poor the from come rehabilitation of implementation the in appear h - omns cutis n atr ad otesen uoe Hist Europe. Southeastern and Eastern in countries communist n fr eaiiain lmttos rhbltto poeue and procedure rehabilitation limitations, rehabilitation, for ons Conclus 77

ion ems which arise in the implementation of of implementation the in arise which ems

v artvs bu te, which them, about narratives av

lation about about lation

ory ory CEU eTD Collection my dowith to I is what it and intend very conduct to interesting would Partisans be and Chetniks post in Partisans rese further Aanymore. war differently in much theYugoslavia than of narrative central the not myth”is “Partisan the and post of delegitimization of purpose Se the on remembrance of culture the in change case the reactions caused court Croatia, in Herzegovina.Montenegro Bosnia and and Serb of relations the effect would rehabilitation Mihailović's Nevertheless, today. is it as Serbia in WarWorld Second the of interpretation the reflect would reflects rehabilitation legal and Partisans the with them equalized officially antifas an as Homeland the in Army Yugoslav the pronounced already Veteranterms. The financial or legal in Lawdescendants2004 his of for lot a change not will r Mihailović's as Furthermore, research. this in offered examples the from seen be can which started, court the in case Mihailović'srehabilitation before Serbia in reevaluated already been rehabilitation symbolicmakes a act. rehabilitation follow would which retribution financial of lack the importantly, Most court. one court the rehabi the makes rehabilitation cases in used be to has proceeding contentious non that law the to addition The Ljotić. Dimitrije or Nedić Milan like people for requests w define ehabilitation has been processed according to the 2006 law, if the court rehabilitates him, it him, rehabilitates court the if law, 2006 the to according processed been has ehabilitation PhD dissertation. The Yugoslav The The changed perspective on the Yugoslav Army in the Homeland is not the only only the not is Homeland the in Army Yugoslav the on perspective changed The ho could and who could not be rehabilitated, making it possible to file rehabilitation file to possible it making rehabilitated, be not could who and could ho - sided, without a possibility of contesting rehabilitation of some person in the the in person some of rehabilitation contesting of possibility a without sided, - 2000 Serbia and looking at the paralel developments of reevaluation of the of reevaluation of developments paralel the at looking and Serbia 2000

ry n h Hmln ad hi lae, rglu Mhioi, have Mihailović, Dragoljub leader, their and Homeland the in Army arch dealing with the change of the perception of the Yugoslav the of perception the of change the with dealing arch

95Ygsai, h uolv atsn ae perceived are Partisans Yugoslav the Yugoslavia,1945 78 ia with countries in the region, judging by the the by judgingregion, the in countries with ia

cond World War in Serbia. Also serving the the serving AlsoSerbia. WorldWar in cond cist movement and and movement cist litation cases in cases litation

- CEU eTD Collection James. Mark, Lazarev,Gojko. Kulji Kulji Končar Kamberovi Studies, Jugovi i Case Sears The Courtroom: the in "History Katherine. Jellison, Histo "The J. Richard Evans, Duli Dragovi Billig, Michael. Samardţić Istorijskog Obejkat Najfrekventniji Mihailovića: Draţe Pokret “Četnički Milivoj. Bešlin, Goldstein, Đ ureti ć ć ć , Tomislav., , Todor., Todor. , ć ć , Ranko. Ranko. , Drama), Belgrade:Drama), Knjiga, 1985 SANU, Narodna politickerepresije.html#more about Repression ( Historian, (2002), 326 Dragoljub of Revival Post the in Revisionism Historical About Prostoru Postjugoslovenskom In na Serbia), Revizionizmu Most in Istorijskom The Revisionism Mihailovic: Draţa to of Subject Movement Frequent Chetnik (The Srbiji” u Revizionizma Eastern Europe,Eastern kasnije.html http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/zakon Serbia, in Rehabilitation the Year Gender andCulture 7 SFRY of Dissolution on Literatureand Historiography Rachomon: Antifascists 2012 ofSerbia, Da of The WarCharacter the on Remarks in Yugoslavia 1941 by Vera Katz, 11 Revisionism Ideological Prostorima and Historiography Critical 187 Jugoslavije in ( Stoljeća” Historiography XX Godina Devedesetih , , Aleksandar., ć oil n Mrl infcne f h Rhbltto o te itm o Political of Victims the of Rehabilitation the of Significance Moral and Social - - Veselin. 47, Belgrade: forHumanHelsinki47, Rights Committee 2002 Serbia, in oo Jsa ' Jasna. Soso, nas

ć - Ivo s 211 , Husnija. ,

http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/drustveni After

The Unfinished Revolution: Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central in Past Communist the of Sense Making Revolution: Unfinished The (Antifascism 83 al, et

“ “ n Grn uie. " Hutinec. Goran and Revised History and New Identity in Eastern Europe“, Europe“, Eastern in Identity New and History Revised Banal NationalBanal

(Sarajevo: Institute forHistory,(Sarajevo:Institute 2007) “ itrorpi Rvsoim n Post in Revisionism Historiographic t “ “ Zakon o Zakon he

Draţa Vol. 9,No.4 (1987),9 ) aenc i uolvnk Rta Drama Ratna Jugoslovenska i Saveznici eoio aaaj o aatr Rt u uolvj 1941 Jugoslaviji u Rata Karakteru o Zapaţanja Nekoliko Sentenced "for Political and Ideological Reasons"? T Reasons"? Ideological and Political "for Sentenced ) -

, , (l , 345 (Revision

Hereticus, Journal for Reexamination of the Past: Controversies about Controversies Past: the of Reexamination for Journal Hereticus, Rehabilitation in Serbia in Rehabilitation “ Bivše Jugoslavije ( Jugoslavije Bivše H Nationalism Društveni i Moralni Značaj Rehabilitacije Ţrtava Političke Represije “ “ Represije Političke Ţrtava Rehabilitacije Značaj Moralni i Društveni - “ ast accessedast on April 28, 2014) 143 (Novi

rtcs Junl o Reaiain f h Past: the of Reexamination for Journal ereticus, - IzmeĎu Kritičke Istoriografije i Ideološkog Revizionizma” ( Revizionizma” Ideološkog i Istoriografije Kritičke IzmeĎu New HavenLondon: and Yale UniversityPress, 2010 aius f h Nto' Sri' Itleta Opsto ad the and Opposition Intellectual Serbia's Nation'. the of Saviours Mihailovi 21. Rehabilitaciji: Dve Godine Kasnije” ( Kasnije” Godine Dve Rehabilitaciji: , Vol. 4,No 1/2, (2005), 63

h Nineties the

etra ad Today and Yesterday Sarajevo:Institute forHistory, 2007

of the Past in the Space of Former YugoslaviaFormer of Space the in Past the of in s xet Witness", Expert as rian ism , London:, HurstLondon, 2002 Co. &

. London:. Publications: Sage 1995

in Serbia“. in - Sad: AKO, 2013) Bibliography 627 /08 Blrd: etr o dacd ea Studies, Legal Advanced for Center Belgrade: 2/2008, eiApki eiinza Hvtkj Istoriografiji Hrvatskoj u Revizionizma Aspekti Neki - , (last 19 Revision of The Past in Fo in Past The of Revision ) in: ,

79 - 2/2008, ,

o accessed on April 28,2014) oe set o Rvsoim n Croatian in Revisionism of Aspects Some Sociologija -

rehabilitaciji eiia ršot n Potrm Bivše Prostorima na Prošlosti Revizija ) 7 ,

- -

- 86 - Yugoslav Space, edited by Momir Momir by edited Space, Yugoslav Belgrade: Center for Advanced Legal Advanced for Center Belgrade: i oils Rgms, In Regimes“, Socialist - -

itr ad Theory, and History 5 Nv Sd Ascain f the of Association Sad: Novi 15. moralni

, 54(4),(2012),625 Politička Politička

- Te lis n Ygsa War Yugoslav and Allies (The %E2%80%93 ) , - The Rehabilitation Act:TwoThe

znacaj 1945 n Perspective", T Perspective", n in in rmer Yugoslavia rmer

Pltcl s o Past: of Use (Political Upotreba Prošlosti: O O Prošlosti: Upotreba

eiia ršot na Prošlosti Revizija )

- In rehabilitacije Journal for Politics, Politics, for Journal he Rehabilitation of Rehabilitation he ,

Antifašizam Juče i Juče Antifašizam - Helsinki Files 11,Files Helsinki dve )

, ed. VeraKatz, ed. ,

o . 1 N. 3 No. 41, Vol. - - 648 Controversies 95 ( 1945” - The Balkans Balkans The godine

he Public Public he ), Between -

zrtava E - Some dited - - CEU eTD Collection Stojanovi Smith, Anthony. Sekulovi Sekulovi Š In Nation?“, a Is „What Ernest. Renan, Rakić Radanovi Radanovi Radanovi Nikoli Nikoli Milosavljević ioei, ra. Itrjk Rvzoia i ršvn Knes” Hsoia Revisionism (Historical Kontekst” Društveni i Revizionizam "Istorijski SrĎan. Milošević, arki ć - ć ć , Vodnelić Javna Javna ( Antifascists 2012 ofSerbia, i Juče Serbia in Revisionism Historical of Paradigm a as Implementation its of the ( Srbiji” u ParadigmaIstorijskogkao Primena Revizionizma Njena i dragoljuba Mihailovi http://www.fpi.rs/blog/institucionalna Dragoljub 2009 Mihailovića byEdited Petar Atanackovi ( 2000 School Elementary High School Remembrance, History, Left: Yugoslav the of Perspec (Dis)Continuities Perspektiven und Partizan. Erinnerungen Linken:Geschichte, jugoslawischen der War World Second The and Revisionism ršot: nne Nzaj, ptea Zoptea Istorije Zloupotreba i Upotreba Neznanje, Znanje, Prošlosti: 195. Belgrade: oftheAssociation Antifascists 2013 of Serbia, Reagovanja” Javna Rehabilitaciji: Ne Mihailovi Dragoljub of Trialthe ( Rehabilitaciju” Njegovu za ValjanostiPostupka Pravnoj Antifascists 2012 ofSerbia, Danas Other on accessed April 28, donosenja Center Rehabilitation London:22. 1990 Routledge, oftheAssociation Antifascists ofSerbia, 2013 Ksa t al et Kosta , , Post in Context), Social and eaiiain f rglu Mihailovi Dragoljub of Rehabilitation ot n rniin Ciia Aayi o te rcse o Sca Transformation Social of Processes the of Analysis Critical Transition. in Lost Nebojša ć ć al. et Kosta ć ć ć ć , Aleksandar. , , Aleksandar. Dubravka. , , Milan. " Milan. , , Milan. Milan. , Mila , - ) Yu ,

Olivera. ,

o dacd ea Studies, Legal Advanced for Reagovanja Danas (2004 Serbia of Republic I (Antifascism of Rehabilitation the of Aspects tives goslav Space goslav Vesna. , n . Myths and Memories of the Nation, Nation, the andMemoriesMyths of . " n. Izg - - “

“ orb Dnšna aoa Rehabi o Zakona Donošenja Potreba ) ) Istorijska Politika u Srbiji posle 2000” ( 2000” posle Srbiji u Politika Istorijska Zakonodavna Politika Vlade Republike Srbije u Sluţbi Revizije Prošlosti RevizijeProšlosti Sluţbi u Srbije Republike PolitikaZakonodavna Vlade ubljeno u Tranziciji:TransformacijeDruštveneProcesaAnalizaKritičkau ubljeno , Belgrade: Zavod za , edited by, edited Tomic et Djordje 222 al, . ( Razred Gimnazije 4. i 3. za Istorija nttcoan i eisa org z Goo Gnrl Dragoljuba Generala Grobom za Potraga Medijska i Institucionalna ) (Antifascism zakona mihailovica . soia a . ard son Škole Osnovne Razred 8. za Istorija “ “ Hereticus, Journal for Reexamination of the Past the of Reexamination for Journal Hereticus, “ Pravni i DrugiMihailovića” Draţe Rehabilitacijei Pravni Aspekti “ Oldl Dui” ( Drugih” Ogledalu U O Pravnoj Valjanosti SuĎenj Valjanosti Pravnoj O - “ ecihseiinsu ud e Zet Wl Kr Welt Zweite der und Geschichtsrevisionismus 01 ( 2011” ) eaiiaia rglua ialvć ko oiik SuĎenje” Političko kao Mihailovića Dragoljuba Rehabilitacija , Belgrade:Zavodza

(No etra ad Today and Yesterday , ed. Momir Samardţić Momir , ed. 11 et al, -

2014) o - ć

rehabilitaciji to the Rehabilitation: P Rehabilitation: the to 2009 , oiia Ue f at Aot itrcl eiins i the in Revisionism Historical About Past: of Use Political - ntttoa ad ei Sac fr h Gae f General of Grave the for Search Media and Institutional 2009 ć

YesterdayToday and

et al, 258 et

- ć Nation and Narration and Nation - 2011/

2011) in the Service of the Revision of the Past and and Past the of Revision the of Service the in 2011) in 1946 and of the Process of his Rehabilitation his of Process the of and 1946 in - Udţbenike 2011 - - http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/2004 politickih 80 - i , (last accessed onMay, (last 22,2014) - 303. Belgrade: Rosa Luxemburg303. Belgrade: Rosa Stiftung, 2011 (No medijska ) ć n h Mro o te “Oth the of Mirror the In

, Udţbenike

) ) s Pltcl Trial Political a as Draţa

, in in ,

132 , o Re to

Oxford: soia Pokretu u Istorija i Nastavnai Sredstva, 2002

a Draţi Mihailoviću 1946. Godine i o o i Godine 1946. Mihailoviću Draţi a - yhs atzn (Dis Partizan: Mythos osudenika

- ublic Reactions ublic - ) 234. Münster: Unrast Verlag, 2013 - potraga Mihailovi , 149 , habilitation: Public Public habilitation: 139. Novi Sad: Association of the the of Association Sad: Novi 139. History for the 3 the for History iaii ( litaciji”

- i Nastavnai Sredstva, 2006 27 (Novi Sad: AKO, 2013)

Historical Politics in Serbia after Serbia in Politics Historical Oxford University 1999 Press, Oxford

, edited by Homy J. Bhabha, 8 Bhabha, J. Homy by edited , - ( 178. Novi Sad: Associa Novi 178. itr fr h 8 the for History - za On the Legal Corectness of of Corectness Legal the On - i ć) - - Need to Pass a Law on on Law a Pass to Need kaznjenika.html grobom

In , ) In , ) , , 2/2004, Belgrade: 2/2004, , Antifašizam Juče i i Juče Antifašizam 119 rd er Ne Rehabilitaciji: Rehabilitaciji: Ne

LegislativeP -

”), generala and 4 and ) 19.01.2013, , ( e” ( ieg” Reactions) In, - Knowing, Not Not Knowing, - 137 )Kontinuitäten )Kontinuitäten

in in th Antifašizam Antifašizam . - th (

oot iz Novosti 2/potreba Legal and and Legal Historical Historical

Belgrade: Belgrade: (Mythhos Grade of of Grade ( , Grade of of Grade -

tion of tion

, olicy olicy 170 ) l , In ,In ast

) - - - .

CEU eTD Collection Transcript Proceeding ofthe 29, ofOctober 2010 Re Rehabilitaciji o Zakon Z Boraca, Zakon oPravima Vojnih Invalida NjihovihPorodica Članova i Forming of about BoardDecision the for the Preservation of Traditions Serbian the of Historians Lawsuit the against Court Decision Court Decision, Court Decision, Documents Vodneli 17. Aviezer. Tucker, Trkulja, Jovica. G. Ronald Suny, Stojanovi 167. Stojanovi Belgrade Knowing, akon o Rehabilitaciji o akon habilitationof Dragoljub Court attheHigh Mihailovic in Belgrade:

http://www.bg.vi.sud.rs/lt/articles/o (2008) Past the of Reexamination Act Rehabilitation Budapest: EuropeanUniversity Central 2008 Press, Ce in Revisionism Historical autoritarne http://www.hereticus.org/arhiva/rehabilitacija Serbia, in Rehabilitation Hereticus, Journal offor Reexamination the Controversies Past: the about ( edited 1945 Remembrance: Textbooks Serbian the in 1945 Occupation: Zagreb: Disput, 2008 Pas the Overcoming and Clashes Historical Prošlosti Serbia Svladavanje in i Textbooks Lomovi History Povijesni in 1941 Revision: the Belgrade: Belgrade: Families Their of Members Republike and Invalids Military Veterans, Belgra74/2007, Liberation Wars %20sept_17_2013.pdf http://www.helsinki.org.rs/serbian/doc/krivicna%20prijava%20hos http://www.bg.vi.sud.rs/lt/articles/o http://www.bg.vi.sud. ć Rehabilitation as a Measure as a LegalRehabilitation ofa Overcoming ofthe PastAuthoritarian , Vladimir. , ć ć

, Dubravka. " Dubravka. , " , Dubravka.

Center forHuman Rights,Center 2010 History of Abuse and Use by Motyl,Alexander J. 335 , No. 113/10, 07.02.2012,Belgrade:High Court,

“ No. 296/10, 07.02.2012,Belgrade:High Court, No. 35/11, 24.02.2012,Belgrade:High Court, Rehabilitacija kaoRehabilitacija M Sluţbeni Sluţbeni “ -

" itr“ In History“. proslosti.html itrorpi Rvso ad eiins“ I In Revisionism“. and Revision Historiographic “ Zakon o Rehabilitaciji: Tuţna Priča sa Moţda Srećnim Krajem” ( Krajem” Srećnim Moţda sa Priča Tuţna Rehabilitaciji: o Zakon Srbije, No.137/2004,Srbije, Belgrade: de: , ( ( Revizija ReviRevizija Rehabilitation ActRehabilitation Rehabilitation ActRehabilitation Godina Okupacije: 1945. u Srpskim Udţbenicima Istorije” ( Istorije” Udţbenicima Srpskim u 1945. Okupacije: Godina Sluţbeni

– Glasnik, Glasnik, Sluţbeni )

rs/lt/articles/o , a Soy ih Psil Hpy End Happy Possible a with Story Sad

E , last , last accessed onMay 27,2014 dited by Sulejman Bosto, 265

Encyclopedia of Nationalism: Fundamental Themes Fundamental Nationalism: of Encyclopedia 2/2008. Belgrade: Cente , (last accessed on April 28,2014)

, VI, 2/2008, Belgrade: Center for Advanced Legal Studies Legal for Advanced Center Belgrade: 2/2008, VI, , Glasnik No. 38/97, Srbije, Republike 46/2001, 46/2004,

Glasnik 2011 2006 ntral Europe after 1989 after Europe ntral zije: 1941. u Udţbenicima Istorijezije: uSrbiji” ( 1941. uUdţbenicima era era Pravnog Savladavanja Autoritativne Prošlosti “

- ) ) - - - ) 358. San Diego: Press,Academic 2001 , , visem visem visem ,

Sluţbeni Sluţbeni dtd y oi Dimitrijevi Vojin by edited 81

- - - sudu/rehabilit sudu/rehabilitacija.html sudu/rehabilitacija.html

) - ) I . kao

( , Sluţbeni Glasnik Republike Srbije, No.33/2006, Srbije, Republike Glasnik

Glasnik Republike Srbije, No.92/2011, Srbije, Republike Glasnik Culture of Remembrance: 1941. The The 1941. Remembrance: of Culture dtd y uemn ot e a, 157 al, et Bosto Sulejman by edited n r for LegalAdvanced Studies, - mera ( 1945 Sećanja: Kultura

- , edited by Michal Kopecek, 1 Kopecek, Michal by edited , 275. Zagreb: Disput,275. 2009

) Glasnik, 2004 pravnog , in in , acija.html

) , utr Sćna 1941: Sećanja Kultura H at n h Making: the in Past ( - ereticus, Journal for for Journal ereticus, savladavanja ) Law Rights onthe of , ć

13 , Sluţbeni

- 3 Belgrade: 33.

Revision of Culture of of Culture

) , Vol. 1, Vol. 1, , - , Glasnik Y ear ofYear

The - - CEU eTD Collection Transcript Proceeding ofthe ofNovember 25,2013 Transcript Proceeding ofthe ofNovember 22,2012 Transcript Proceeding 20,2 ofthe ofJune Transcript Proceeding ofthe 23, ofMarch 2012 Transcript Proceeding ofthe ofNovember 30,2011 012