DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Railway Station Passenger Boarding Platform Gap Filler Solutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Railway Station Passenger Boarding Platform Gap Filler Solutions Evaluation of Railway Station Passenger Boarding Platform Gap Filler Solutions for North Carolina Institute for Transportation Research & Education, North Carolina State University: Mathew Palmer, MURP Joy Davis, MPA, PMP Christopher Cunningham, MSCE, PE Waugh Wright Jeffery Chang, PE NCDOT Project 2018-027 FHWA/NC/2018-027 November 2018 NCDOT 2018-027 Project Report This page is intentionally blank. 2 NCDOT 2018-027 Project Report North Carolina Department of Transportation Research Project No. 2018-027 Evaluation of Railway Station Passenger Boarding Platform Gap Filler Solutions for North Carolina Mathew Palmer Joy Davis Christopher Cunningham Waugh Wright Jeffery Chang November 2018 3 NCDOT 2018-027 Project Report Technical Documentation Page Report No. Government Accession No. Recipient’s Catalog No. 2018-027 4. Title and Subtitle Report Date Evaluation of Railway Station Passenger Boarding Platform Gap Filler November 30, 2018 Solutions for North Carolina Performing Organization Code Author(s) Performing Organization Report No. Mathew Palmer, MURP; Joy Davis, MPA, PMP; Christopher Cunningham, MSCE, PE; Waugh Wright; Jeffery Chang, PE Performing Organization Name and Address Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Institute for Transportation Research and Education North Carolina State University Contract or Grant No. Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Type of Report and Period Covered North Carolina Department of Transportation Final Project Report Research and Analysis Group August 2017 to November 2018 104 Fayetteville Street Sponsoring Agency Code Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 2009-08 Supplementary Notes: Abstract: In July 2018, the new Raleigh Union Station (RUS) opened for business in the Warehouse District of downtown Raleigh to address forecasted population growth and the operational need for expanded service capabilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that railway platforms be easily accessible and usable for all individuals, including those with disabilities, with the stipulation that passenger platform gaps be a maximum of 3 inches (75mm). The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) needed to identify a platform gap filler product that meets ADA requirements and suitable for use at RUS. This project identifies the optimal platform gap filler solution for high platform rail stations in North Carolina and introduces a documentation process necessary to implement the recommended gap filler solution. After extensive research, the platform gap filler product developed by Delkor Rail was selected as the recommended product for RUS and other NC high platform rail stations. In addition to identifying the optimal platform gap filler solution for RUS and NC, the state’s first Gap Safety Management Plan was developed through this project. Ultimately, the results of this project will enable the NCDOT Rail Division to continue to grow the state’s rail system and to ensure that the system is safe and accessible for all passengers while also saving staff time and money. Key Words Distribution Statement Rail, Gap Filler, Safety, Accessibility, Multimodal, Performance Measurement Security Classif. (of this report) Security Classif. (of this page) No. of Pages Price Unclassified Unclassified 57 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized 4 NCDOT 2018-027 Project Report Disclaimer The contents of this document reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the Institute for Transportation Research and Education or North Carolina State University. The authors are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the North Carolina Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration at the time of publication. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Acknowledgements The research team thanks the North Carolina Department of Transportation for supporting and funding this project. The research team is particularly grateful to the Steering and Implementation Committee members for the exceptional guidance and support they provided throughout this project. In particular, the research team is grateful for the leadership and support provided by NCDOT Rail Division Facilities Engineer Consultant Craig Newton throughout the project. In addition to the Steering and Implementation Committee, the research team would like to express special gratitude to Kyle Anderson, NCDOT Rail Operations Manager, who provided access to Capital Yard and was essential to the testing processes of this project. Special thanks also goes to John Kirby of NCDOT Research and Development, who continues to help guide the project along and offered assistance with meeting scheduling and contractual questions. Without the help of all the above individuals, the research team would not be able to be complete the project in a successful and timely manner. 5 NCDOT 2018-027 Project Report Executive Summary Raleigh’s Cabarrus Street Amtrak Station is one of the busiest stations in the southeastern U.S. Each year, more than 160,000 passengers are served by the railway station. In July 2018, the new Raleigh Union Station (RUS) opened for business in the Warehouse District of downtown Raleigh to address forecasted population growth and the operational need for expanded service capabilities. RUS is one of several planned improvements to the railway corridor between Raleigh and Charlotte designed to increase railroad capacity, efficiency, and safety. The new facility is designed to be a multimodal hub that will provide increased transportation capacity for the Research Triangle region of North Carolina. As such, the design and operations of RUS must reflect the mobility needs of all transit riders that will be utilizing Amtrak services, including those with disabilities. Moreover, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that railway platforms be easily accessible and usable for all individuals, including those with disabilities, with the stipulation that passenger platform gaps be a maximum of 3 inches (75mm). Such gaps, which refer to the horizontal or vertical space between a rail car and the edge of the station platform, can create hazards for station users and can increase over time due to settling of the track and platform. Gap fillers, which can be mounted along the edge of a train platform to reduce the gap distance between the platform and the entrance of a passenger train, are considered the optimal solution for addressing the gap issue at RUS. Gap filling technology allows passengers to board and alight safely, increases the efficiency of boarding and alighting times, and eases wheelchair access on and off a train. In addition, gap fillers are more permanent solutions compared to bridge plates and require minimal maintenance. All of these benefits can help improve staff productivity and passenger independence. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) needed to identify a platform gap filler product that meets ADA requirements and suitable for use at RUS. Additionally, the NCDOT needed a solution that was applicable for other high platform stations within the NC rail system. This project identifies the optimal platform gap filler solution for high platform rail stations in North Carolina and introduces a documentation process necessary to implement the recommended gap filler solution. After extensive research, the platform gap filler product developed by Delkor Rail was selected as the recommended product for RUS and other NC high platform rail stations. An Australian company, Delkor Rail has a manufacturing facility in the United States and years of experience providing platform gap fillers for rail stations across the world. In addition to identifying the optimal platform gap filler solution for RUS and NC, the state’s first Gap Safety Management Plan was developed through this project. This plan, which aligns with FRA requirements, highlights hazards in the RUS platform area and documents how RUS partners will address these hazards in the future to support station safety. Ultimately, the results of this project will enable the NCDOT Rail Division to continue to grow the state’s rail system and to ensure that the system is safe and accessible for all passengers while also saving staff time and money. 6 NCDOT 2018-027 Project Report Table of Contents Technical Documentation Page ................................................................................... 3 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 6 Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 7 List of Exhibits ............................................................................................................ 8 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 9 2. Background ....................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Objectives...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Users' Satisfaction Towards Public Transit System In
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Understanding Users’ Satisfaction Towards Public Transit System in India: A Case-Study of Mumbai Rahul Deb Das 1,2 1 Department of Geography, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 IBM, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Strasse 6, 80807 Munich, Germany Abstract: In this work, we present a novel approach to understand the quality of public transit system in resource constrained regions using user-generated contents. With growing urban population, it is getting difficult to manage travel demand in an effective way. This problem is more prevalent in developing cities due to lack of budget and proper surveillance system. Due to resource constraints, developing cities have limited infrastructure to monitor transport services. To improve the quality and patronage of public transit system, authorities often use manual travel surveys. But manual surveys often suffer from quality issues. For example, respondents may not provide all the detailed travel information in a manual travel survey. The survey may have sampling bias. Due to close-ended design (specific questions in the questionnaire), lots of relevant information may not be captured in a manual survey process. To address these issues, we investigated if user-generated contents, for example, Twitter data, can be used to understand service quality in Greater Mumbai in India, which can complement existing manual survey process. To do this, we assumed that, if a tweet is relevant to public transport system and contains negative sentiment, then that tweet expresses user’s dissatisfaction towards the public transport service.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Childhoods Report
    Lost Childhoods A study on platform children and other children in distress in India Prepared by Udita Das Submitted to the Paul Hamlyn Foundation India programme March 2013 1 Contents Contents Background 2 Methodology 5 Research findings 6 Future strategy ideas 34 Appendices I. Interventions on justice for children 36 II. NCPCR: Perspectives on protection of child rights 42 III. Khushboo Jain vs. Ministry of Railways 44 Forward > 2 Lost Childhoods: A study on platform children and other children in distress Background India is home to over 400 million children under 18 years old. These children make up more than 55 per cent of the population. Based on state police records in 2005, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) stated that, on average, more than 44,000 children are reported missing in India each year. Around 11,000 of these children remain untraced.1 This number could actually be much higher, as many cases are never reported because the families of these children are from a marginalised background and do not have the ability to report the incident. It is estimated that there are 11 million street children living in India, most of whom live in and around railway stations. In Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata, approximately 100,000–125,000 street children figure in the lists of missing, runaway, abandoned or trafficked children.2 Without support, these children are at risk of various forms of abuse and a lack of rights that not only denies them a childhood, but also forces them to grow up fast. Approximately 70,000 children arrive on station platforms in India per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta-To-Alaska-Railway-Pre-Feasibility-Study
    Alberta to Alaska Railway Pre-Feasibility Study 2015 Table of Content Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... i Infrastructure and Operating Requirements................................................................ ii Environmental Considerations and Permitting Requirements .................................... ii Capital and Operating Cost Estimates ......................................................................... iii Business Case .............................................................................................................. iii Mineral Transportation Potential ................................................................................ iii First Nations/Tribes and Other Contacts ..................................................................... iv Conclusions .................................................................................................................. iv 1 | Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 This Assignment............................................................................................................ 1 This Report ................................................................................................................... 2 2 | Infrastructure and Operating Requirements ........................................................ 3 Route Alignment ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of High-Speed Rail Station Development Into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: the Case of San Jose Diridon
    MTI A Comparative Analysis of Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 High-Speed Rail Station Transportation and California Department of Transportation Development into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-75 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Locolines Edition 57
    DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE DIVISIONAL SECRETARY: Marc Marotta 0414 897 314 DIVISIONAL PRESIDENT: Terry Sheedy 0417 310 400 DIVISIONAL ASSIST. SECRETARY: Jim Chrysostomou 0404 814 141 DIVISIONAL VICE PRESIDENT: John Marotta 0414 864 702 DIVISIONAL DELEGATES Metropolitan Sub-division: Kevin Duggan 0404 811 589 Paris Jolly 0422 790 624 Pacific National Sub-division: Peter Laux 0417 526 544 Pacific National (ex Freight) Sub-division: James Styles 0427 018 963 Passenger Sub-division: Wayne Hicks 0407 035 282 Judge says train driver breached duty of care . Full article Page 3 JUNE 2013 LOCO LINES Conten ts LLOCOOCO LLINESINES EDITION 57 Marc Marotta—Loco Div Secretary 3 JUNE 2013 Loco Lines is published by the Terry Sheedy—Branch / Div President 8 Locomotive Division of the Australian Rail, Tram & Bus Industry Union – Victorian Branch. See the bottom of this Jim Chrysostomou— Assist. Secretary 10 page for the Locomotive Division’s business address, telephone, e-mail and website Paris Jolly— Metro. Sub-Div Sec. 11 details. Loco Lines is distributed free to all financial members of the Wayne Hicks— V/ Line Pass Report 13 Locomotive Division. Retired Enginemen also receive the magazine for free. It is made available to non-members at a Nelsons Column 14 cost of $20.00 per year. Advertisements offering a specific benefit to Locomotive Signal Sighting Reports 28 Division members are published free of charge. Heritage groups are generally not charged for advertising or tour information. Talkback from Hinch 30 Views or opinions expressed in published contributions to Loco Scholarships 31 Lines are not necessarily those of the Union Office. We also reserve the right to alter or delete text for legal or other Where Is It …? 32 purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Rail Development Handbook
    DEVELOPMENT THE “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook offers both planners and political decision makers a comprehensive view of one of the largest, if not the largest, investment a city can undertake: an urban rail system. The handbook properly recognizes that urban rail is only one part of a hierarchically integrated transport system, and it provides practical guidance on how urban rail projects can be implemented and operated RAIL URBAN THE URBAN RAIL in a multimodal way that maximizes benefits far beyond mobility. The handbook is a must-read for any person involved in the planning and decision making for an urban rail line.” —Arturo Ardila-Gómez, Global Lead, Urban Mobility and Lead Transport Economist, World Bank DEVELOPMENT “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook tackles the social and technical challenges of planning, designing, financing, procuring, constructing, and operating rail projects in urban areas. It is a great complement HANDBOOK to more technical publications on rail technology, infrastructure, and project delivery. This handbook provides practical advice for delivering urban megaprojects, taking account of their social, institutional, and economic context.” —Martha Lawrence, Lead, Railway Community of Practice and Senior Railway Specialist, World Bank HANDBOOK “ Among the many options a city can consider to improve access to opportunities and mobility, urban rail stands out by its potential impact, as well as its high cost. Getting it right is a complex and multifaceted challenge that this handbook addresses beautifully through an in-depth and practical sharing of hard lessons learned in planning, implementing, and operating such urban rail lines, while ensuring their transformational role for urban development.” —Gerald Ollivier, Lead, Transit-Oriented Development Community of Practice, World Bank “ Public transport, as the backbone of mobility in cities, supports more inclusive communities, economic development, higher standards of living and health, and active lifestyles of inhabitants, while improving air quality and liveability.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Collision at Swanage station 16 November 2006 Report 35/2007 September 2007 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2007 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Rail Accident Investigation Branch 3 Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Collision at Swanage station 16 November 2006 Contents Introduction 6 Summary of the report 7 Key facts about the accident 7 Immediate cause, causal and contributory factors, underlying causes 7 Recommendations 8 The Accident 9 Summary of the accident 9 Location 9 The parties involved 10 External circumstances 10 The infrastructure 10 The train 12 Events
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Interoperability for Facilitation of International Railway Transport
    ENHANCING INTEROPERABILITY FOR FACILITATION OF INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Vasile-Neculai OLIEVSCHI, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Division ESCAP. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. This study is issued without formal editing. ______________________ ENHANCING INTEROPERABILITY FOR FACILITATION OF INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 3 II. ASIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Object Detection at Level Crossing Using Deep Learning
    micromachines Article Object Detection at Level Crossing Using Deep Learning Muhammad Asad Bilal Fayyaz * and Christopher Johnson Department of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 September 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 29 November 2020 Abstract: Multiple projects within the rail industry across different regions have been initiated to address the issue of over-population. These expansion plans and upgrade of technologies increases the number of intersections, junctions, and level crossings. A level crossing is where a railway line is crossed by a road or right of way on the level without the use of a tunnel or bridge. Level crossings still pose a significant risk to the public, which often leads to serious accidents between rail, road, and footpath users and the risk is dependent on their unpredictable behavior. For Great Britain, there were three fatalities and 385 near misses at level crossings in 2015–2016. Furthermore, in its annual safety report, the Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) highlighted the risk of incidents at level crossings during 2016/17 with a further six fatalities at level crossings including four pedestrians and two road vehicles. The relevant authorities have suggested an upgrade of the existing sensing system and the integration of new novel technology at level crossings. The present work addresses this key issue and discusses the current sensing systems along with the relevant algorithms used for post-processing the information. The given information is adequate for a manual operator to make a decision or start an automated operational cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1
    Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1. Overview 5 6. Site 55 1.1 Background 5 6.1 Introduction 55 1.2 Introduction 5 6.2 Multi-modal Planning 56 1.3 Contents of the Guidelines 6 6.3 Context 57 1.4 Philosophy, Goals and Objectives 7 6.4 Station/Platform Confi gurations 61 1.5 Governing Principles 8 6.5 Track and Platform Planning 65 6.6 Vehicular Circulation 66 6.7 Bicycle Parking 66 2. Process 11 6.8 Parking 67 2.1 Introduction 11 6.9 Amtrak Functional Requirements 68 2.2 Stakeholder Coordination 12 6.10 Information Systems and Way Finding 69 2.3 Concept Development 13 6.11 Safety and Security 70 2.4 Funding 14 6.12 Sustainable Design 71 2.5 Real Estate Transactional Documents 14 6.13 Universal Design 72 2.6 Basis of Design 15 2.7 Construction Documents 16 2.8 Project Delivery methods 17 7. Station 73 2.9 Commissioning 18 7.1 Introduction 73 2.10 Station Opening 18 7.2 Architectural Overview 74 7.3 Information Systems and Way Finding 75 7.4 Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) 77 3. Amtrak System 19 7.5 Safety and Security 78 3.1 Introduction 19 7.6 Sustainable Design 79 3.2 Service Types 20 7.7 Accessibility 80 3.3 Equipment 23 3.4 Operations 26 8. Platform 81 8.1 Introduction 81 4. Station Categories 27 8.2 Platform Types 83 4.1 Introduction 27 8.3 Platform-Track Relationships 84 4.2 Summary of Characteristics 28 8.4 Connection to the station 85 4.3 Location and Geography 29 8.5 Platform Length 87 4.4 Category 1 Large stations 30 8.6 Platform Width 88 4.5 Category 2 Medium Stations 31 8.7 Platform Height 89 4.6 Category 3 Caretaker Stations 32 8.8 Additional Dimensions and Clearances 90 4.7 Category 4 Shelter Stations 33 8.9 Safety and Security 91 4.8 Thruway Bus Service 34 8.10 Accessibility 92 8.11 Snow Melting Systems 93 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Infrastructure - Tram Stop Platform Design
    Standard Infrastructure - Tram Stop Platform Design CE-021-ST-0012 1.01 17/03/2020 Disclaimer: This document is developed solely and specifically for use on Melbourne metropolitan tram network managed by Yarra Trams. It is not suitable for any other purpose. You must not use or adapt it or rely upon it in any way unless you are authorised in writing to do so by Yarra Trams. If this document forms part of a contract with Yarra Trams, this document constitutes a “Policy and Procedure” for the purposes of that contract. This document is uncontrolled when printed or downloaded. Users should exercise their own skill and care or seek professional advice in the use of the document. This document may not be current. Current standards are available for download internally from CDMS or from https://yarratrams.com.au/standards. Infrastructure - Tram Stop Platform Design Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 COMPLIANCE ......................................................................................................................................... 4 4 REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 General .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]