Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail. A substantial part of the document is also dedicated to types of FVL wagons, various types of locomotives and their technical specifications. It also includes a section that tackles the question of European regulation of rail. It briefly presents the current EU projects and initiatives for rail transport. There is a section that discusses the key railway organisations and associations, and, finally, the additional supportive materials, such as maps, glossary, various tables and charts, useful links, etc. have been added. This document has been reviewed several times since its first publication. The current version 3 of the ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was revised and complemented with a new chapter on “Transport documents in rail” and prepared for publication in December 2017. This detailed document on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ is relevant not only to ECG’s members, but also to the whole FVL sector in Europe. It represents a unique undertaking to approach the rail transport sector from the perspective of FVL, taking into account the complexity of European rail. It can be used as an instructive manual for those who wish to understand the European rail complexity from the standpoint of FVL even if they have no prior knowledge. It is sincerely hoped that this document will be supported by everyone active in FVL in Europe whether as LSP, customer or any other capacity. It will require regular updating and improving so we welcome your input in helping us to achieve this. Oleh Shchuryk 06.12.2017 1 2 Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe 3 4 Table of Contents Abbreviations................................................................................................................................................... 11 1. Brief History of the European Railways ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1. History of Rail in France ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.2. History of Rail in Germany .................................................................................................................... 20 1.3. History of Rail in Switzerland ................................................................................................................ 22 1.4. History of Rail in South Europe ............................................................................................................. 25 1.4.1. Italy ................................................................................................................................................ 25 1.4.2. Spain .............................................................................................................................................. 26 1.5. History of Rail in Central and Eastern Europe ...................................................................................... 28 1.5.1. Austria ............................................................................................................................................ 28 1.5.2. Czech Republic ............................................................................................................................... 29 1.5.3. Slovakia .......................................................................................................................................... 30 1.5.4. Hungary ......................................................................................................................................... 31 1.5.5. Poland ............................................................................................................................................ 32 1.5.6. Romania ......................................................................................................................................... 34 1.5.7. Russian Federation ........................................................................................................................ 35 1.5.8. Ukraine .......................................................................................................................................... 36 1.5.9. Bulgaria .......................................................................................................................................... 37 1.6. Rail Links with Adjacent Countries ....................................................................................................... 39 2. European Railways Technical Specifications ............................................................................................... 41 2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 41 2.1.1. The Tracks ...................................................................................................................................... 41 2.1.1.1. Single / Double track .............................................................................................................. 41 2.1.1.2. Track Centres .......................................................................................................................... 42 2.1.2. Traffic Direction ............................................................................................................................. 42 2.1.3. Electrification System .................................................................................................................... 43 2.1.4. Gauges ........................................................................................................................................... 45 2.1.4.1. Loading Gauge ........................................................................................................................ 45 2.1.4.2. Track Gauge ............................................................................................................................ 48 2.1.4.3. Structure Gauge ...................................................................................................................... 49 2.1.5. Additional Parameter .................................................................................................................... 49 2.1.5.1. Platform Height .......................................................................................................................... 49 5 2.1.5.2. Train Protection Systems ........................................................................................................ 50 3. Rail Network and its Liberalisation .............................................................................................................. 56 3.1. Brief history of Rail Liberalisation in Europe ........................................................................................ 56 3.2. The networks ........................................................................................................................................ 58 3.2.1. National Rail Networks .................................................................................................................. 58 3.2.2. Rail Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................... 59 3.2.2.1. Stations ................................................................................................................................... 62 3.2.2.2. Marshalling and switch yards ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Northern Corridor of the Trans-Asian Railway
    ERINA REPORT Vol. 58 2004 JULY The Northern Corridor of the Trans-Asian Railway Pierre Chartier Economic Affairs Officer, UNESCAP Background formulation of rail and road networks with an emphasis on The 1980s and early 1990s witnessed some dramatic minimizing the number of routes to be included in the changes in the political and economic environment of networks and making maximum use of existing countries in the UNESCAP region. Peace returned to infrastructure; (iii) a focus on the facilitation of land Southeast Asia, countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia transport at border crossings through the promotion of became independent and a number of countries adopted relevant international conventions and agreements as an more market-oriented economic principles. These changes, important basis for the development of trade and tourism; which resulted in more outward-looking policies, led to and (iv) the promotion of close international cooperation unprecedented growth in trade to and from the UNESCAP with other United Nations agencies, including UNECE and region, at a rate that was twice the global figure. In UNCTAD2, as well as other governmental and non- addition, a salient feature of the region's trade growth was governmental organizations such as the International Union the increasing significance of trade within the region itself. of Railways (UIC), the Organization for Railway Concomitantly, the number of journeys by people within Cooperation (OSJD), the International Road Union (IRU) the region to neighboring countries for both tourism and and the International Road Federation (IRF). business purposes also soared. Each of these developments increased demands on the region's transport and The Trans-Asian Railway component of ALTID.
    [Show full text]
  • Engadin ENGLISH EDITION MAGAZINE N MAGIC O
    ENGLISH Engadin MAGAZINE No . 3 W I N T E R –––––– 2 0 / 2 1 MAGIC ENGLISH EDITION 2 3 Engadin Winter — 20/21 Dear guests, Ideally we would like to magic you straight over to our valley, Germany but unfortunately we are not able to do that just yet. Instead, you can come to us along a World Heritage railway line of fairy-tale charm, Austria or travel over the bewitching snow-covered mountains with your own SWITZERLAND France GRAUBÜNDEN sleigh. We’re waiting for you: with sparkling powder snow, all kinds of gastronomic wizardry and the purest ice in the world. ENGADIN Italy We wish you happy reading and a good journey – and we look forward to welcoming you here soon! The people of the Engadin Lej da Segl Lej m m m m m m Cover photograph by Filip Zuan Filip by photograph Cover m m m m m Piz Bernina, 4,049 Bernina, Piz Piz Palü, 3,905 Palü, Piz Piz Scerscen, 3,971 Scerscen, Piz 3,937 Roseg, Piz m Map: Rohweder Piz Cambrena, 3,604 Cambrena, Piz Piz Tremoggla, 3,441 Tremoggla, Piz Piz Fora, 3,363 Fora, Piz m m m Piz Lagalb, 2,959 Lagalb, Piz Diavolezza, Diavolezza, 2,978 Piz Led, 3,088 Led, Piz Piz Corvatsch, 3,451 Corvatsch, Piz Diavolezza 3,433 Murtèl, Piz m Lago Bianco Lagalb Piz Lavirun, 3,058 Lavirun, Piz Val Forno Italy Punta Casana, 3,007 Casana, Punta Val Fex Corvatsch Punta Saliente, 3,048 Saliente, Punta Bernina Pass Surlej, 3,188 Piz Val Fedoz Maloja Pass Val Roseg MALOJA Swiss National Park Lej da Silvaplauna SILS SURLEJ ST.
    [Show full text]
  • NEM 806 D Eisenbahn-Epochen in Deutschland
    Normen Europäischer Modellbahnen NEM Eisenbahn-Epochen 806 D in Deutschland Seite 1 von 6 Empfehlung Ausgabe 2008 (Ersetzt Ausgabe 2003) 1. Allgemeines Gestützt auf NEM 800, Ziffer 2 werden die Epochen und Perioden für Deutschland wie folgt festgelegt und beschrieben: 2. Epochen und Perioden Bezeichnung und Zeitraum Charakteristik Länderbahn-Epoche Epoche l Epochen des Eisenbahnbaus von den Anfängen bis zur Vollendung eines 1835 - 1920 zusammenhängenden Streckennetzes. Entstehung großer Staatsbahnnetze sowie zahlreicher Privatbahnen mit überwiegend regionaler Bedeutung. Entwicklung der Dampflokomotive bis zum Abschluss ihrer Grundform. Farbiges Erscheinungsbild von Lokomotiven und Wagen. Entstehung erster Territorialeisenbahnen mit Privat- oder Staatsbahncharakter. Periode a Weiterentwicklung des Streckenbaus bis zur Vollendung eines 1835 - 1875 zusammenhängenden Grundnetzes. Entwicklung verschiedener Grundformen der Dampflok. Entstehung von neun großen Staatsbahnnetzen in Preußen, Bayern, Sachsen, Periode b Württemberg, Baden, Hessen, Mecklenburg, Oldenburg und Elsass-Lothringen. 1875 - 1895 Ergänzung des Streckennetzes. Erste Nebenbahnen (Sekundärbahnen) sowie Klein- und Lokalbahnen (Tertiärbahnen). Erste Schmalspurbahnen. Entwicklung der Dampflok mit Verbundwirkung und der Tenderlok. Erste preußische Normalien im Fahrzeugbau. Anwendung der vier Klassenfarben (gelb, grün, braun, grau) in Preußen. Einführung der durchgehenden Druckluftbremse für Personenzüge. Abschluss des Netzausbaus. Periode c Neuorganisierung der Staatsbahnen. Gemeinsame
    [Show full text]
  • Travelglo-Europe-By-Rail-2020-Au.Pdf
    Issue 1 Europe By Rail 2020 Prices from $ * 235per day travelglo.com.au All the essentials you need At TravelGlo, we don't just know what travellers That's why we’ve worked hard to recreate the real want, we know how to connect and enable you joy that is taking you along Europe’s most revealing to discover the world. We don't just make tours, routes and railways. Where the journey becomes we craft adventures that will last a lifetime. part of the destination, go deeper and learn about And we don't just take you from A-to-B, we take the cultures of the incredible places other travellers care of the details so you can live in the now. may never achieve. Do more than just see. Go Our job is to handle the planning, your job is further. Delight your senses. And adopt whatever to unlock a sense of freedom and surprise. pace you want, to create your own adventure. 2 Europe By Rail 2020 What’s included for you? Your Itineraries Your Accommodation You choose the destination and itinerary and Rest easy knowing every 3 or 4-star hotel we will take care of the rest. Experience the you stay in is hand-picked, so you can get the must-sees of Europe without worrying about most out of each destination. Often centrally a thing. Built with your feedback in mind, our located to maximise your experience, carefully crafted itineraries create magic moments with warm standards of service and comfort, that will inspire you in ways you never imagined.
    [Show full text]
  • [(Central] [Central, 6 E -1 4
    /NEWYORK^ Fnewyork^ [(Central] [Central, 6 e -1 4 Reference Marks NEW YORK CENTRAL LC.L Between POPULAR ALL-COACH DAYLINER Dally. II Meal station. Sunday only. • Thla train does not carry baggage SERVICE ADVANTAGES Chicago, Pittsburgh & Boston Daily except Sunday- Ex. Sun.—Runs dally except Sunday. Daily except Monday. E.T.—Eastern Standard Time. Daily except Saturday. C.T.—Central Standard Time. In addition to the train service shown, buses of the United Traction Company run at frequent intervals between Albany and Troy. | I i^i ichedulot . pcart'd to 5 Packing and handling research Stops on signal to receive passengers for stations beyond Albuny. traffic requirement! for most ... they assure the security ol Stops to receive or discbarge passengers for or from Astatabula and beyond. Stops except Saturdays and Sundays. rX|M*llitioilH .1. Ii\ i-r n--. the shipped merchandise. bb Stops at 6.25 a. m. to discharge passengers from Rochester and beyond or to 2 Free pick up and delivery ser• receive passengers for Chicago. Smooth operation . easy 4 Stops on signal to receive passengers for beyond Troy. vice . direct from Hliippcr's grades... superlative roadbed. Stops on signal to discharge or receive passengers. to roiisipiirrV door. No baggage handled for or from this station; *y Constant supervision and pro• Stops regularly, but only to receive passengers. * f Optional trucking allowance to tection in transit.. still mon Stops only to discbarge passengers. nhi|»|MTH jiiul roiittignrcR ... a security for shipped merchan Runs Saturdays only. mi I • i i ii i ii I tavina to both. dise.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Possibilities for Heavy Road Vehicles – Virtual Boat Tail
    Aerodynamic possibilities for heavy road vehicles – virtual boat tail Panu Sainio, Research group Kimmo Killström obtained for Vehicle Engineering, M.Sc. from Helsinki Chief Engineer. University of technology [email protected] TKK in 2010 having work Obtained M.Sc 1997, Lic.Sc career before that in aircraft 2006. Has been participating and vehicle maintenance. a number of national and international projects of vehicle engineering and testing. His primary research interests are tire-road contact and heavy hybrid vehicles. Panu Sainio Kimmo Killström Aalto University* Aalto University* Finland Finland Matti Juhala, Head of Engineering Design and Production department, professor in Vehicle Engineering. Obtained M.Sc. 1974, Dr.Sc. 1993 from Helsinki University of Technology. Laboratory manager in Laboratory of Automotive engineering 1975-1996 and professor of Vehicle engi- neering since 1996 Matti Juhala Aalto University* Finland Abstract The focus of this paper is presenting concept survey made for lowering the aerodynamic coefficient of heavy road vehicles. Target vehicles were a long distance bus and a vehicle combination of 25.25 meters and 60 ton. The conception goal for the truck was to cut the aerodynamic coefficient into half. Because of such a target, it was agreed not to follow normal technical and economical characteristics of today’s truck engineering. The main objectives were to raise discussion about the potential of aerodynamics in the context of heavy road vehicles in Finland and particularly to test one technical solution to improve the aerodynamic performance of the rear end of the trailer. This solution is called virtual boat end. It is based on flow of pressurized air through the trailing edges of the trailer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Standard Gauge
    The Myth of the Standard Guage: Rail Guage Choice in Australia, 1850-1901 Author Mills, John Ayres Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/426 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366364 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au THE MYTH OF THE STANDARD GAUGE: RAIL GAUGE CHOICE IN AUSTRALIA, 1850 – 1901 JOHN AYRES MILLS B.A.(Syd.), M.Prof.Econ. (U.Qld.) DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE & ECONOMICS GRIFFITH BUSINESS SCHOOL GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 ii ABSTRACT This thesis describes the rail gauge decision-making processes of the Australian colonies in the period 1850 – 1901. Federation in 1901 delivered a national system of railways to Australia but not a national railway system. Thus the so-called “standard” gauge of 4ft. 8½in. had not become the standard in Australia at Federation in 1901, and has still not. It was found that previous studies did not examine cause and effect in the making of rail gauge choices. This study has done so, and found that rail gauge choice decisions in the period 1850 to 1901 were not merely one-off events. Rather, those choices were part of a search over fifty years by government representatives seeking colonial identity/autonomy and/or platforms for election/re-election. Consistent with this interpretation of the history of rail gauge choice in the Australian colonies, no case was found where rail gauge choice was a function of the disciplined search for the best value-for-money option.
    [Show full text]
  • Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis.
    [Show full text]
  • European Modular System for Road Freight Transport – Experiences and Possibilities
    Report 2007:2 E European Modular System for road freightRapporttitel transport – experiences and possibilities Ingemar Åkerman Rikard Jonsson TFK – TransportForsK AB ISBN 13: 978-91-85665-07-5 KTH, Department of Transportation Strandbergsgatan 12, ISBN 10: 91-85665-07-X and urban economics SE-112 51 STOCKHOLM Teknikringen 72, Tel: 08-652 41 30, Fax: 08-652 54 98 SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM E-post: [email protected] Internet: www.tfk.se European Modular System for road freight transport – experiences and possibilities . Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate Swedish and Finnish hauliers’ experiences of using the European Modular System, EMS, which entails Sweden and Finland the use of longer and heavier vehicle combinations (LHV’s). In short, EMS consists of the longest semi-trailer, with a maximum length of 13,6 m, and the longest load-carrier according to C-class, with a maximum length of 7,82 m, allowed in EU. This results in vehicle combinations of 25,25 m. The maximum length within the rest of Europe is 18,75 m. Thus, by using LHV’s, the volume of three EU combinations can be transported by two EMS combinations. This study indicates that the use of LHV’s according to EMS have positive effect on economy and environment, while not affecting traffic safety negatively. Swedish hauliers have the possibility of using either the traditional 24 m road trains or 25,25 m LHV’s according to EMS for national long distance transports. Experiences of using EMS vehicle combinations are mostly positive. LHV’s according to EMS implies increased load area and flexibility compared to the 24 m road trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7
    Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7 railroads that operate on standard gage (5) Removal of an intermittent auto- track which is part of the general rail- matic train stop system in conjunction road system of transportation. with the implementation of a positive (b) This part does not apply to rail train control system approved by FRA rapid transit operations conducted over under subpart I of part 236 of this chap- track that is used exclusively for that ter. purpose and that is not part of the gen- (b) When the resultant arrangement eral system of railroad transportation. will comply with part 236 of this title, it is not necessary to file for approval § 235.5 Changes requiring filing of ap- to decrease the limits of a system as plication. follows: (a) Except as provided in § 235.7, ap- (1) Decrease of the limits of an inter- plications shall be filed to cover the locking when interlocked switches, de- following: rails, or movable-point frogs are not in- (1) The discontinuance of a block sig- volved; nal system, interlocking, traffic con- (2) Removal of electric or mechanical trol system, automatic train stop, lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, train control, or cab signal system or from hand-operated switch in auto- other similar appliance or device; matic block signal or traffic control (2) The decrease of the limits of a territory where train speed over the block signal system, interlocking, traf- switch does not exceed 20 miles per fic control system, automatic train hour; or stop, train control, or cab signal sys- (3) Removal of electric or mechanical tem; or lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, (3) The modification of a block signal from hand-operated switch in auto- system, interlocking, traffic control matic block signal or traffic control system, automatic train stop, train territory where trains are not per- control, or cab signal system.
    [Show full text]
  • T HR TR 25000 ST Buffer Stops, Version 1.0
    Technical Note – TN 033: 2018 For queries regarding this document [email protected] www.transport.nsw.gov.au Technical Note – TN 033: 2018 Issue date: 21 December 2018 Effective date: 21 December 2018 Subject: Amendments to T HR TR 25000 ST Buffer Stops, version 1.0 This technical note is issued by the Asset Standards Authority (ASA) to notify amendments to T HR TR 25000 ST Buffer stops, v1.0. 1. Background This technical note explains the speed related risk criteria to be considered during the buffer stop design stage. It provides amendments to the maximum allowable deceleration rate for lighter weight rolling stock while complying with the allowable impact force requirements. This technical note also provides amended maximum allowable impact force that the newer generation trains can accommodate without any damage. These figures shall be used by all parties undertaking review or design of new buffer stops across the Metropolitan Rail Area. 2. Section 12 Risk assessment Insert the following after the third paragraph: In order to establish the nature and extent of damage upon collision, the risk assessment for a buffer stop design shall consider the possibility of a train travelling at a speed higher than the design speed and the expected consequential damage upon collision. In the SFAIRP justification, an indication shall be provided to indicate the following: • Up to the design speed that no permanent damage will occur to the train. The buffer stop will be fully recoverable, either automatically or within simple maintenance actions. • Up to the 'worst case speed' that the damage will be easily reparable; for example, easy repair or replacement of buffer stop parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Guidance of All-Wheel Steered Multiple-Articulated Vehicles
    Lateral guidance of all-wheel steered multiple-articulated vehicles Citation for published version (APA): Bruin, de, D. (2001). Lateral guidance of all-wheel steered multiple-articulated vehicles. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR544960 DOI: 10.6100/IR544960 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2001 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]