General Meeting
UNOPS – Nairobi February 23, 2015 Agenda
• Review of Action Points • Post-Deyr Seasonal Assessment - FSNAU • Food Security Response Update • Risk Management Unit Presentation • “Mobile Money Payments for CFW” Report – FAO • Risk Management through Remote Sensing – SWALIM • Cash & Markets Task Force Update • AOB
Review of Action Points
Change in structure - Review of APs during FSC meeting - Review of minutes when circulated
Action Points: • Members were requested to inform the FSC if they had any reservations with the cluster sharing all information regarding the 4W matrix when submitting reports. This followed the FSC survey to its partners regarding whether to share or not share the identity of the partners that were implementing FSC programs.
Information for Better Livelihoods
KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2014/15 POST Deyr SEASONAL FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION ASSESSMENT IN SOMALIA
Food Security Cluster Meeting 23 February 2015, Nairobi FSNAU Post Deyr 2014/15 Seasonal Assessment
Scope and timeline: Food security and nutrition assessment of rural, urban and displaced populations across Somalia between October-December (for field work)
Process: (1)FSNAU-led assessment with the participation of Technical staff of other UN agencies, partners and government institutions
(2) Regional and All-Team analysis workshops in Garowe & Hargeisa with government and partners
(3) Technical vetting in Mogadishu (Nutrition) and Nairobi with government and partners
(5) Presentation to Government authorities (Mogadishu, Garowe and Hargeisa)
(6) Presentation to other stakeholders in Nairobi and technical release
(7) Public dissemination (technical release, food security and nutrition outlook; comprehensive technical reports) Civil Insecurity- Most Likely Scenario (Jan-Jun 2015)
Security risks: High or Medium security risk in most of the South-Central Somalia. Low security risk in the North and parts of Central Current Security Hotspots: Banadir, Bay, Bakool, Hiran, Lower Shabelle , Middle Shabelle, Gedo, Lower Juba and Middle Juba
Impact on Lives/ Livelihoods: oLosses of lives; displacements; informal taxations (frequent check points), trade restrictions, periodic request of contributions, restricted pastoral migrations, etc. 2014 Deyr Rainfall Performance
Deyr 2014 rainfall (comparison with 2001-2013 mean) Deyr 2014 Seasonal Performance: 2014 Deyr rains (October- December) were largely normal in most parts of the country.
oAreas with below normal rainfall: Localized parts of Hawd, Nugal Valley, Sool Plateau and East Golis (Northwest regions). Few pockets in North Mudug and Bari regions Northeast regions parts of Hawd and Addun of Central Regions. Agro-pastoral and riverine livelihoods of Hiran Region. Parts of Garbaharey and Bardera districts (Gedo region). Coastal areas in both Middle and Lower Shabelle Regions. Most of the Juba region, with minimal Deyr rains in Coastal Deeh and Juba agropastoral livelihoods
oRiver Flooding: areas of Balad in Middle Shabelle Region and NDVI (3rd Dekad of Dec 2014) riverine areas of Middle and Lower Juba regions.
Outlook for Gu 2015:
o The March to May 2015 rains in Somalia are likely to be near average in terms of cumulative amounts (especially over southern Somalia) with near-normal onset. AGRICULTURE Trends in Cereal Production (South and Northwest) o 2014 Deyr plus off-season harvest is 130% of 2013 Deyr production, 106% of the Post- War Average (1995-2003) and 96% of 5yr average (2009-2013). o 2014 Deyr cereal production is above average in Bay and near average in Lower Shabelle, the two main surplus producing regions o Poor to below average harvest in Juba & Hiran regions but off-season harvest is expected in Juba riverine areas in March- April o 2014 Gu/Karan season cereal production in Northwest is 106% of 2013 production but only 70% of the Average production for 2010-2013 (PET). o Average cereal stocks (3-5 months) available to Poor farmers in Shabelle, Bay and Gedo regions; 1-2 months in other farming regions apart from Lower Juba (no stocks until off-season harvest in Mar-Apr) and in Hiran Agropastoral
Deyr 2014/15 Cereal (Maize and Sorghum) Production in Southern Somalia
Deyr Cereal Production Estimates in Southern Somalia FINAL (rounded to 100)
Deyr 2014 Production in MT Deyr 2014 as Deyr 2014 as % of Deyr Deyr 2014 as % of 5 Regions % of Deyr PWA year average Maize Sorghum Total Cereal 2013 (1995-2013) (2009-2013)
Bakool 400 4,100 4,500 164% 166% 91% Bay 2,800 41,900 44,700 139% 130% 99% Gedo 1,700 4,000 5,700 98% 104% 117% Hiran 1,400 2,900 4,300 120% 74% 114% Juba Dhexe (Middle) 1,600 1,800 3,400 326% 79% 69% Juba Hoose (Lower) 500 0 530 46% 38% 41%
Shabelle Dhexe (Middle) 9,100 4,800 13,900 137% 117% 106%
Shabelle Hoose (Lower) 20,000 8,700 28,700 117% 86% 90%
Deyr 2014 Total 37,500 68,200 105,700 130% 107% 96%
FINAL (rounded to 100) Deyr plus Off-season Cereal Production Estimates in Southern Somalia Deyr 2014 as % Deyr 2014 Production in MT Deyr 2014 as % of Deyr 2014 as % of Deyr of 5 year Regions Deyr PWA 2013 average Maize Sorghum Total Cereal (1995-2013) (2009-2013) Bakool 400 4,100 4,500 164% 166% 91% Bay 2,800 41,900 44,700 139% 130% 99% Gedo 2,800 4,000 6,800 104% 123% 131% Hiran 1,400 2,900 4,300 120% 74% 114% Juba Dhexe (Middle) 3,400 1,800 5,200 239% 109% 87% Juba Hoose (Lower) 1,800 100 1,900 118% 96% 63% Shabelle Dhexe (Middle) 9,100 4,800 13,900 117% 111% 103% Shabelle Hoose (Lower) 20,000 8,700 28,700 107% 86% 88% Deyr 2014 Total 41,700 68,300 110,000 126% 109% 96% LIVESTOCK
o Favorable pasture/ water in most regions, except in localized areas in Sanag, Bari, Mudug, Hiran and in border areas in Lower Gedo and Juba regions o Average milk production reported also in most livelihoods o Camel disease has caused some livestock deaths in Juba o Livestock (camel/ sheep/goat) herd size of poor households in the North is mostly at/ above baseline levels; near baseline/ below baseline in most livelihoods of South- Central; Further increase in livestock (sheep/ goat) herd size is expected through June 2015. o Livestock exports in 2014 (4,999, 688 heads) exceeded the levels in the previous years
Outlook through June 2015: oLivestock body conditions are likely to remain near average. Pasture, browse, and water availability will be lower than usual in the areas that received less rainfall during the Deyr. oMilk availability will decline seasonally during the Jilaal dry season. oMilk availability will increase due to : increased pasture/water due to near normal forecast Gu 2015; expected medium kidding/lambing and cattle calving expected from late March to June oLivestock export is expected to increase over the coming months due Ramadan demand.
Market Prices o Local cereal prices increased or were stable from July to November in most markets, but they started declining with the start of the December Deyr harvest with the exception of Lower Juba o Livestock prices declined due to excess market supply and increased border patrols and restricted movements related to insecurity incidents in northern Kenya o Prices for most imported commodities have declined or remained stable o The MEB cost declined in most regions in the 2nd half of 2014; a significant increase was recorded in Bakool region (trade disruptions) compared to a year ago and 5-year average
Projection (Feb-Jun 2015): •Staple sorghum and maize prices are expected to decline seasonably in January through March in major cereal producing regions (Bay and Shabelle) in the South as a result of average to above average harvest in January •Some markets remain poorly integrated with producer markets and not well served by the local supplies from seasonal production, hence price decline is always shorter period •Rice prices are likely to remain stable as a result of record Global rice production in 2014; •Cattle prices are expected to decline further due to oversupply on local markets until May 2015 when they start increasing due to Ramadan collection Purchasing Power (Rural Livelihoods)
Terms of Trade: Cereal to Goat Terms of Trade (ToT) goat/
cereals: 100 Central (Red Rice) NE(Red Rice) oToT incr from July 2014 in 90 80 NW (Red Rice) most southern regions due to 70 60
declined cereal prices; but fell in 50
40
other regions, most significantly per Kg Head 30 in Central (18%) due to 20 10
declined livestock prices; ToT is 0
08 09 10 13 14 11 12
07 08 10 11 12 13 14 09
------
------
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun
Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec higher/ close to 5yr average Dec Month (2009-2013) in most regions,
apart from Bakool, Gedo, Terms of Trade: Agriculture Labour Wage to Cereal Northern and Central Regions, which are lower Terms of Trade (daily labour/ cereals): oToT has improved in most crop- growing areas compared to 6m and 5yr average due to declined cereal prices/ increased labour wages; the highest ToT (17kg of cereals/ daily farm labour rate) recorded in Bay region. Urban Livelihoods
.Increased ToT casual labour wage to cereals in most Terms of Trade (casual labour wage/ cereals) regions; ToT is higher/ near than 5yr average in most 25 regions apart from Bakool, Hiran and M. Juba regions 20 15 where it is lower 10 . 5 Cereal price have declined in most conflict-affected urban 0 areas (Hudur, Wajid, Bulo-Burte) since July 2014, mostly
due to improved harvest prospects in the surrounding
Bay
Bari
Sool
Gedo
Hiran
Nugal
Sanag Awdal
Bakool regions, access to humanitarian assistance and local
Mudug
Banadir
Galgadud
Togdheer M.Shbelle
L.Shabelle traders smuggling in cereals; however, prices remain
W.Galbeed Lower Juba Dec-13 July-14 Dec-14 Dec 5 YrsMiddleJuba Av. significantly higher compared to the beginning of the year (50-70%) and the five-year average.
Conflict-Affected Districts •Insecurity in the South is likely to persist in the coming 20,000 months affecting trade flow and humanitarian access in the 18,000 affected regions; the risk is even higher for areas that may 16,000 14,000 be affected by military operations in coming months 12,000 10,000 •Cereal prices are likely to remain high in conflict-affected 8,000 6,000 urban areas in the coming months. 4,000 2,000 0 •High to very high vulnerability to food insecurity in most Wajid Buloburte Garbaharey Hudur Tiyeglow urban areas of Somalia – HHs spend more than 70 percent of their income on food alone in most urban areas Jan-14 July-14 Dec-14 (based on definition from IFPRI, 2008) IDPs: Food Consumption
Food Consumption Score ‘ ’ 100% . Over 80% of IDPs have Acceptable food 90% Acceptable 80% consumption in most settlements apart 70% 60% from: Dolow (60%) and Qardho (77%) 50% Borderline 40% 30% . CSI shows improvement (i.e. decline) since 20% Poor 10% the previous survey (Jun14) in most IDP 0% settlements apart from Berbera,
Burco Dhusamareb and Galkayo
Dolow
Baidoa
Dobley
Qardho
Banadir
Garowe
Berbera
Bossaso
Galkayo Kismayo Hargeisa
Dhusamareb . Asset poverty among the majority of IDPs: >80% have 0-4 assets CSI Index Trend . High expenditures on food (over 75% on 80 70 average) 60 50 40 . Insecurity is likely to sustain in most 30 southern regions that may cause further 20 10 displacements 0 . High likelihood of continued forced evictions of IDPs from public and private premises in Mogadishu & Kismayo BL Gu 2014 Deyr 2014/15 Key Nutrition Highlights
•The overall level of acute malnutrition in Somalia has declined since Post Gu (6 months ago) but the current median rate in South-Central region is still “critical” (≥ 15% GAM).
•The number of acutely malnourished children across Somalia (prevalence) is estimated at 202 600 (UNDP-2005), a 7 % decline from the Post Gu 2014. Of these, 38 200 are severely malnourished, a 13% decline since Gu 2014 and 31% decline since Deyr 2013/14 (one year ago). More than 80 % of these children are located in South Central region.
•Nutrition situation remains Serious to Critical amongst IDPs which indicates a need to scale up and sustain ongoing interventions. Improved nutrition situation in Mogadishu and Kismayo IDPs following a coordinated scaling up of interventions
•Critical levels of Global Acute Malnutrition (GAM) are seen only in South Central Somalia or among IDPs in South Central and Northeast; no Critical GAM in the Northwest.
•Current nutrition hotspots where malnutrition rates are Critical (GAM >15%) are the following: Bay Agropastoral, N Gedo Pastoral, N Gedo Riverine, N Gedo Agropastoral, S Gedo Riverine, S Gedo Pastoral, and S Gedo Agropastoral, Beletweyne District, Mataban District, Dolow IDPs, Baidoa IDPs, Bossasso IDPs, Garowe IDPs and Galkayo IDPs. Change in Nutrition Situation in Somalia Improving in NW/NE is seen by decrease in Critical (red), some Acceptable (green) but SC remains critical(red)
Deyr 2014
Despite the overall improvement, deterioration in GAM was observed among Hargeisa IDPs, Bossaso IDP, Baidoa IDPs, East Golis, Nugal Valley and North Gedo Pastoral livelihood zones. Summary Results
SOMALIA ESTIMATED NUTRITION SITUATION ACUTE FOOD SECURITY SITUATION OVERVIEW Global Acute Malnutrition: February-April 2015 Projections Rural, Urban and IDP Populations: February-June 2015, Projection Key Message Highlights
.A largely favorable Deyr season has contributed to a reduction in the number of people in Crisis and Emergency (IPC Phases 3 and 4) – a nearly 29% decrease since July 2014 and the lowest since the peak of the famine period in 2011.
.However, 731 000 people remain acutely food insecure (IPC Phases 3 and 4) of which 76% represent IDPs and require urgent humanitarian assistance and livelihood support through mid 2015
.Nearly 2.3 million additional people are classified as Stressed (IPC Phase 2); This group of households may struggle to meet their minimal food requirements through the end of the year, they remain highly vulnerable to shocks that could push them back to food security crisis if no appropriate support is provided.
.202 600 children under 5 years of age are acutely malnourished of which 38 200 are severely malnourished and face a higher risk of morbidity and death;
.In flood-affected and rainfall deficit areas, the situation is likely to continue deteriorating further until the start of off-season harvest in March and Gu rains in April. Thank you!
Questions/Comments? Extra Slides for Q & A
Approach for IPC Classification for IDP & Urban Populations
For urban representative surveys
% Expenditure on Food Low (less than 50) Medium (50-65) High (66-75) Very high (>75) Food Consumption Moderate Severe Moderate Severe Moderate Severe Moderate Severe Score Coping Coping Coping Coping Coping Coping Coping Coping strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies Acceptable Borderline Poor
For IDP representative surveys
Food % Expenditure on Food Consumption Score Low (less than 50) Medium (50-65) High (66-75) Very high (>75) Acceptable Borderline Poor Internally Displaced Persons (IDPS)
• Internal movements of 114,730 people between September and November; in the last six months main reasons for movements included insecurity, floods and evictions (79%) [source: UNHCR]
Based on FSNAU survey results:
• Highest proportion of recent (past one year/ past 3 months) of IDP arrivals: Kismayo (45%/ 20%); Dobley (38% / 14%) and Banadir (32% / 10%)
Duration of residency in IDP settlements
100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
1- 3 Months 4- 12 Months 1-3 Years > 3 Years FSC Response Update
Improved Access and Safety Nets 395,416 responses delivered covering 57% of monthly target
Livelihood Assets 328,729 responses delivered covering 54% of monthly target
Livelihood Seasonal Inputs 809,808 responses delivered
FOOD SECURITY CLUSTER
19 FEBRUARY 2015 ABOUT THE RMU
Established in 2011 to help UN agencies better understand and manage the risks of operating in Somalia.
The RMU has developed a number of risk management tools and services. RMU - LIMITATIONS
- Absence of an established feedback mechanism.
- Limited engagement with donors, NGO community.
Limited use of the monitoring function and training - services.
RMU – STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
Continue to build a shared understanding across the UN, - donors and NGOs.
- Further develop UN-wide risk management solutions.
Develop complementary and harmonized approaches - across the aid community (Donors, NGOs, World Bank, UN).
Improve the international community’s contextual and - strategic risk analysis and its links to risk management practices. 2015-2017 COMMITMENTS
- Clarity on RMU support and capacities.
- Client focussed services.
- Increased engagement with partners.
- Quality project management.
- Transparency and impact/value for money. RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Facilitate, design and Approaches Information Sharing promote the adoption of Risk Assessments and common risk Analysis management standards (UN/Partners) Risk Management Advice
Monitoring
Training
Database and Information Sharing Best Practice Dissemination UN MPTF Risk Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis Upon request, provide
UN/Partners with
Risk Management Advice reports on contracts, Monitoring including tailored recommendations Training
Database and Information Sharing Best Practice Dissemination UN MPTF Risk Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis
Risk Management Advice Upon request provide tailored advice on due Monitoring diligence approaches and reviews Training
Database and Information Sharing Best Practice Dissemination UN MPTF Risk Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis
Risk Management Advice
Monitoring Upon request conduct monitoring activities on Training behalf of UN agencies and, in some instances, donors. Database and Information Sharing Best Practice Dissemination UN MPTF Risk Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis
Risk Management Advice
Monitoring
Training Provision of introductory training on risk Database and Information management principles and Sharing practices. Best Practice Dissemination UN MPTF Risk Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis
Risk Management Advice
Monitoring
Training
Database and Information CIMS & PRS with client Sharing driven features. Supporting partners in customization Best Practice and uploading contractor Dissemination related data UN MPTF Risk Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis
Risk Management Advice
Monitoring
Training
Database and Information Sharing Continue collaboration with Best Practice RMU Afghanistan to share Dissemination features and innovations & participate in range of RM UN MPTF Risk policy fora. Management Support RMU – SERVICE LINES
Development of Common Database and Approaches Information Sharing
Risk Assessments and Analysis
Risk Management Advice
Monitoring
Training
Database and Information Sharing Engage with the UN MPTF Best Practice to design and implement a Dissemination robust risk management UN MPTF Risk strategy for the funds Management Support operations RMU – WHAT WE DON’T DO
The RMU acts in an advisory capacity only – it has no - authority over UN agencies or any other partner
- CIMS is not an automated risk assessment tool!
The RMU does not conduct physical risk / - security risk assessments The RMU does not - conduct Audits
The RMU does not - conduct Investigations WAY FORWARD
- Launch of the Partner Engagement Survey
Identification of individual organization and - collective needs
Prioritization of needs based on mutual - understanding
- Follow up and tailored support
Review of partnership to ensure a reciprocally - beneficial engagement LAUNCH: PARTNER ENGAGEMENT SURVEY
Highlights from the Survey
1. 90% are interested in RMU services
Most respondents are not aware of the 8 RMU service 2. lines
For better services from the RMU, respondents require 3. sustained and open dialogue between the NGOs and the RMU, M&E and capacity building THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS?
Piloting Mobile Money Payments for Cash for Work Outline Introduction Methodology Results Recommendations Questions & Comments Introduction A research project was undertaken in Somaliland in 2014 to asses the use of mobile phones in CFW transfers
Pilot is inline with FAO Somalia strategy to diversify delivery mechanisms for CFW & reduce dependence on Hawala.
Mobile money is increasingly being used by aid organisations to deliver cash directly to beneficiaries.
Expected benefits: the possibility of lower costs, improved accountability and competition among providers. Methodology Five stage approach was undertaken: a) Desk study: identifying technical experts to consult and key materials on mobile banking platforms in Somalia b) Scoping Mission: Contacting key informants to map out basic parameters of issues c) Feasibility study: Fourteen site research in rural Hargeisa (October 2012), Sanaag and Burao (December 2012 d) Pilot study (140 respondents): 4 villages- 2 where phones & mobile banking was used and 2 control (Money vendor). e) Call Centre Monitoring: post pilot evaluation call back regarding coping strategies
Findings of Desk Study and Scoping Mission Mobile phone use in Somaliland is spreading fast
Telesom dominates the mobile phone market
Telesom’s mobile banking platform, Zaad, is currently the only operator covering nearly 50% of its users.
NGOs are willing and able to use mobile phone banking platforms.
The rural context challenges this technology although it is expected to expand within the next five years. Findings of Feasibility Study Zaad is a fast growing and popular technology
Mobile phone transfers should only be used where there is
signal
Support would be needed for:
- illiterate beneficiaries
- registration (ID requirements)
- Phone charging (provide solar charges)
Findings of Feasibility Study…
Phones should be provided to beneficiaries
Local preferences should be taken into account
In some locations, assistance with costs should be assessed
for phone use against Hawala
Few people know about the voice responsive system built
into Telesom
Findings of Pilot Study …. Call Centre data was matching the study findings.
Most of the respondents (91%) do not have a problem using
their phones.
Most beneficiaries have a sufficient degree of functional
literacy or can get assistance from kin and neighbours.
Zaad was preferred over Telesom (64%).
Findings of Pilot Study…
Mobile phones are used for: - calling relatives - getting the news & learning about market trends. - Receiving money especially via Zaad Giving beneficiaries mobile phones yielded high contact rates (70%) compared to 25% via the Call Centre. All beneficiaries reported no problem with receiving cash.
Findings of Pilot Study… Confirmation of payment was swift with a 100% confirmation rate.
Purchases were done within a very short time period of receiving the money(< 7 days)
The main expenditures were on food (over 70%) and debt repayment (over 20%).
Follow up calls showed that negative coping strategies had been avoided.
Recommendations Mobile phones are a viable technology for delivering payments for CFW . Buying and distributing phones and even low cost solar chargers to beneficiaries would ensure smooth functioning. NGOs will have to enforce a work undertaken verification policy with workers. FAO Somalia should liaise with HQ to ensure a risk assessment process is in place Potential mobile banking partners should be carefully screened.
Thank you.
? Somalia Water and Land Information Management
Addressing Risk Management Through Enhanced Accountability of Cash Based Interventions (CBI) Using Remote Sensing
FAO Somalia Risk Management Framework
FAO Somalia risk management framework is made up of several elements: . Remote Sensing Comparison of high-definition satellite images to ascertain the progress of infrastructure rehabilitation (e.g. irrigation canals, water catchments, etc. are functional), and its impact (e.g. expansion of irrigated areas, use by community, etc.) . Due diligence verifications – procurement (Goods, Works, Services, LoAs) . Biometrics – finger prints and face detection for beneficiary payment . Call Centre – call beneficiary to confirm payment by implementing partners . Awareness campaigns – local radio campaigns
Risk management, as a planning and monitoring tool, is one of the building blocks within FAO’s approach to results based planning, monitoring and reporting.
Definitions Risk management in Remote Sensing Application of resources to remotely control and monitor, so as to maximize the realization of rehabilitation interventions on productive infrastructure (Feeder roads, canals and catchments) Remote sensing (Remote Monitoring) The science of acquiring, processing and interpreting images to acquire information about an object (In our case an infrastructure) without making physical contact with the object and thus in contrast to on site observation. Relationship between Risk Management and Remote Monitoring of Cash Based Interventions Rehabilitating productive infrastructure and enhancing accountability of implementing partners hand in hand, while maximizing the benefits to intended beneficiaries Advantages of Using Remote Sensing
. Cheap and rapid method of acquiring up-to-date information over a large geographical area . It is the only practical way to obtain data from inaccessible regions (for example: due to security reasons) . Provide repetitive coverage of the earth and this temporal information is very useful for studying landscape dynamics, phenological variations of vegetation and change detection analysis . At small scales, regional phenomena which are invisible from the ground are clearly visible. Examples: faults and other geological structures or seeing the forest instead of the trees. . Cheap and rapid method of constructing base maps in the absence of detailed land surveys. . Easy to manipulate with the computer, and combine with other geographic layers in a GIS environment.
Workflow for Remote Monitoring of CBI Activities
Implementing GPS coordinates extracted from digital partner photos QUALITY CHECK
VHR IMAGES REPORT submitted to CBI Unit for further A digital photo taken with a GPSactions enabled camera of the planned infrastructure MUST be provided by an Selection of suitable images already implementing partner before any rehabilitation work present in SWALIM archive as concern commences (Riyo Xidho Catchment18/10/14 ) Date 1 and Date 2 • Analysis of VHR images (Date1 vs. Date2) • Cross-checking with field data info/NGO reports Identification & acquisition of suitable • Production of SWALIM report with assessment images present in Digital Globe archive and provided FREE-OF-CHARGE by USDS results for each infrastructure initially provided (classified as: Rehabilitated, Not
Rehabilitated, Doubtful, Not Assessed) < 50% of infrastructure > 50% of infrastructure covered by suitable images covered by suitable images
Remote Sensing Monitoring Unit for Procurement process REHABILITATION ASSESSMENT GPS coordinates are then extracted from the digital photo, mapped and verified on a Satellite Image Images purchased through a (Example of a date 2013 Image showingcommercial Riyo provider Xidho ( MDA) Catchment) Overview of Implementing partners under CBI Phase IIB
NGO APD NGO SCI Puntland Beneficiaries 2,037 TOTAL CFW beneficiaries: 125,986 HH Beneficiaries 1,118 Budget $ 624,039 Budget $ 342,502 Infrastructure(s) WC TOTAL payments: 11,864,642 $ Infrastructure(s) WC NGO World Vision NGO NCA Beneficiaries 1,400 Beneficiaries 1,387 Budget $ 449,890 57.19 % of the 2,308 points provided by Budget $ 424,925 Infrastructure(s) WC & C the 19 NGOs monitored have been Infrastructure(s) WC & R NGO SVO NGO VSF Germany Beneficiaries 646 assessed Beneficiaries 583 Budget $ 197,894 Budget $ 178,625 Infrastructure(s) WC Infrastructure(s) R NGO HOD NGO RAWA Beneficiaries 1,991 Beneficiaries 2,266 Budget $ 902,032 Budget $ 728,198 Infrastructure(s) WC & C Infrastructure(s) WC & R
NGO BRADO NGO WARDI Beneficiaries 1,950 Beneficiaries 3,816 Budget $ 626,646 Budget $ 962,946 Infrastructure(s) WC & R Infrastructure(s) WC
NGO SCI Hiraan NGO GREDO Beneficiaries 2,500 Beneficiaries 4,344 Budget $ 630,902 Budget $ 1,096,230 Infrastructure(s) WC Infrastructure(s) WC NGO JCC NGO CEFA Beneficiaries 2,712 Beneficiaries 3,954 Budget $ 684,384 NGO MERCY CORPS Budget $ 1,057,056 Infrastructure(s) WC Beneficiaries 300 Infrastructure(s) WC & C Budget $ 153,864 NGO NAPAD NGO SARD Infrastructure(s) WC & C Beneficiaries 2,330 Beneficiaries 4,762 Budget $ 274,002 Budget $ 1,201,688 Infrastructure(s) WC, R & C NGO SHARDO Infrastructure(s) WC INFRASTRUCTURES: NGO JDO Beneficiaries 680 Water Catchment = WC Beneficiaries 893 Budget $ 181,798 Starting of work: September 2013 Infrastructure(s) WC Feeder Road = R Budget $ 225,331 Canal = C Ending of work: December 2013 Infrastructure(s) WC & R Examples of monitoring through VHR
Examples of monitoring through VHR: Map and Summary table Examples of monitoring using VHR Imagery Rehabilitated Infrastructure Examples of monitoring using VHR Imagery A Newly Excavated Catchment Examples of monitoring using VHR Imagery Doubtful Rehabilitation Examples of monitoring using VHR Imagery Doubtful Rehabilitation Examples of monitoring through VHR : Not Rehabilitated Infrastructure Examples of monitoring through VHR : Rehabilitated Feeder Road
Examples of monitoring through VHR : Rehabilitated canals impact on cropped areas
YearYearYear 2013 20102013 Results by Activity
CBI Phases Rehabilitation Monitoring Progress
CBI phase IIB CBI phase III CBI phase IV
CBI Phase II B monitoring completed CBI Phase III monitoring in progress (Cont IIB) CBI Phase IV monitoring in progress Total No. of NGO monitored : 18 out of 19 Total No. of NGO to be monitored: 10 Total No. of NGO to be monitored: 12 Infrastructure :163 out of 285 catchments Infrastructure :68 out of 87 catchments to be Planned infrastructure verified :164 were monitored - 57.19% monitored (19/87 catchments monitored in CBI II) catchments, 135 catchments Rehabilitated - 47.37% 21 catchments Rehabilitated 14 catchments Doubtful - 4.91% 3 catchments Doubtful 3 feeder roads and 4 soil bunds 14 catchments Not Rehabilitated - 2 catchments Not Rehabilitated 7 catchments Rehabilitated 4.91% 42 catchments Not Assessed 157 catchments, 4 soil bunds,3 122 catchments Not Assessed - 42.81% 4 canals,11 feeder roads and 10 soil bunds feeder roads Not Assessed 151.99km of feeder roads and 12.51 km of 1 canal (0.412 km)assessed as canals assessed as rehabilitated Rehabilitated
Integration of CBI Reports into WALISP
Somalia Water and Land Intervention Sharing Platform (WALISP)
Aim of the platform is to; . Share infrastructure baseline information . Share interventions carried out under the FAO cash based interventions program . Status of productive infrastructure before, during and after rehabilitation . Allow for visualization and download of interventions information
System under development Thank you Cash and Markets Task Force
• CMTF TORs have been developed and endorsed by SAG.
• CMTF Outputs: 1. Unconditional cash transfer guidance note specific to determining transfer value. 2. Conditional cash transfer (relevant to food security) guidance note specific to determining transfer value. 3. Conditional cash transfer (relevant to food security) guidance note specific to labor/time requirements.
• Composition: 6-8 members (UN/LNGO/INGO) • Timeline: TOR outputs to be completed by June 2015 • Method of work: Meetings as needed and email Cash and Markets Task Force
Next Steps: • Partners interested in joining the CMTF are requested to nominate themselves by sending an email to [email protected] along with a 1-2 paragraph justification for inclusion to CMTF based on technical capacity and CTP experience in-country.
• DEADLINE is March 3rd, 2015
• Final selection will be done by CMTF Chairs (FSC and CaLP) based on partner’s technical capacity, CTP experience and willingness to participate. AOB
- Response Analysis Workshop Feedback - Bosaso Elections Completed - IM Training Update
THANKS!
Contacts Email: [email protected] Web: http://foodsecuritycluster.net/countries/somalia