DOCSLIB.ORG

The Russian Association of Motor Insurers Annual Report 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Russian Association of Motor Insurers Annual Report 2009 THE RUSSIAN ASSOCIATION OF MOTOR INSURERS ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Table of contents Compulsory Motor Third Party Liability Insurance: 4 The year 2009 in figures Car ownership and road accident statistics 6 The CMTPL insurance market 10 CMTPL insurance as part of the Russian insurance market 16 The work of the Russian Association of Motor 20 Insurers in 2009 Direct settlement of claims and simplified reporting of road 22 accidents The International Green Card System 28 Compensation payments 32 Total amount of compensation payments made 34 Amendments to legislation 34 Complaints 35 Legal issues 37 Legislation relating to Compulsory Motor Third 38 Party Insurance Improving the legal and regulatory framework for CMTPL 40 insurance Preparing amendments to the rules of professional conduct 41 Technical support for RAMI members 42 Insurance premium tariffs 43 Information technology 44 The RAMI Automated Information system (RAMI AIS) 46 Protecting personal data 46 Road safety 48 The use of mechanical means of control of socially important 50 transport vehicles in Russia Voluntary accreditation of technical examiners of vehicles 55 International relations and the exchange 56 of information International contacts, seminars and conferences 58 Appendices 62 Extract from the report of the auditors 66 Extract from the report of the internal audit commission 67 3 Compulsory Motor Third Party Liability Insurance: The year 2009 in figures Growth in the number of vehicles in Russia Car ownership and road accident statistics 50 40 The following factors need to be taken growth in vehicles on the road increased into account when describing the opera- from 1.4% to 7.4%. However, this increase 30 tion of the CMTPL insurance system: was not maintained in 2008 and 2009, • The total number of vehicles on the during which years the rate of growth was 20 road. 6.6% and 2.1% respectively. During 2009, • The types of vehicle. there was a numerical increase in the • The number of road accidents. number of vehicles on the road of 900,000 10 • The number of individuals injured. vehicles. One of the main causes of the • The proportion of road accidents, reduction in the rate of growth of vehicles that result in serious injury. on the road was a significant drop in new 0 • The proportion of road accidents with car sales. material damage. Figure 2 sets out the breakdown of • The causes of road accidents. vehicles on the roads of the Russian In the last few years, the number of Federation in 2009 by type of vehicle2. vehicles on the road has grown. Up to During 2009, the proportion of light 2008, road accident frequency also vehicles increased (from 77.7% to 78.65%) increased, but during 2008 and 2009 the Fig. 1 whilst the proportion of goods vehicles number of accidents that resulted in death reduced (from 13% to 12.65%) as did the or injuries fell and at the same time the share of passenger transport (from 2.2% to total number of people injured in road acci- 2.1%) and motor cycles (from 7.1% to dents also fell. 6.6%). The number of light vehicles on the Number of vehicles by vehicle type Table 1 and Figure 1 set out the basic road grew by 3.3% during 2009. The corre- (excluding trailers and semitrailers) information about the number of vehicles sponding figure for passenger transport on the roads of the Russian Federation was 0.2%, but the number of goods vehi- between 2004 and 20091. cles reduced by 0.5% and motor cycles reduced by 6.2%. Between 2004 and 2007, the rate of Table 1 Fig. 2 6 1,2 Data provided by the State Inspectorate for Road Safety. 7 A comparison of the number of vehicles and the number of Comparison between growth in accidents and motor vehicles CMTPL insurance policies issued 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fig. 4 A comparison of the growth in numbers of CMTPL policies issued and number of vehicles Number of people killed and injured in road accidents Fig. 5 total number of CMTPL policies issued fell. 203,600 (figure 4). Fig. 3 Before 2008, the number of accidents The total number of people killed or on Russian roads had been increasing and injured on the roads also reduced by 5.9% Before 2009, the growth in vehicle previous year. as a result, the number of those claiming to 283,100 (300,800 in 2008). In addition, numbers had been accompanied by an compensation through CMTPL insurance the number of people killed reduced by Figure 3 compares the growth in vehicle increase in the number of CMTPL policies also increased. In 2008 and 2009, the 12.9% and of those injured by 5.1%. numbers and the number of CMTPL poli- issued. During 2009, there were total number of road accidents in Russia cies issued. Figure 5 sets out the figures for killed was 218,300 and 203,600 respectively. 44,400,000 vehicles in the Russian and injured on the roads between 2004 Up to 2009, the growth rates in both Federation whilst the number of CMPTL In 2009, the number of accidents that and 20093. vehicles and CMTPL policies issued were policies issued was 35,200,000 — a caused injuries continued to reduce. The roughly equal. However, during 2009 the At the same time, the number of CMTPL reduction of 4.3% as compared with the total number of accidents in 2009 was 8 3 Data provided by the State Inspectorate for Road 9 Safety. A comparison in the rate of growth in the number of Number of accident victims receiving compensation and accidents and in the number of claims reported total claims payments Fig. 6 Fig. 8 CMTPL insurance premium and claims Average CMTPL insurance premium Fig. 7 Fig. 9 claims made continued to grow (figure 6). number of road accidents where there was collected; In 2009, both the amount of claims pay- The main reason for this is the fact that the only damage to property increased. • 2.07 million claims for compensation ments made and the number of insurance were made; claims made increased (Figure 8). Thus, there • 1.96 million claims were settled; were 2.07 million claims made in 2009, an The CMTPL insurance market • 48.5 billion Rubles in claims pay- increase of 4.6% over 2008. At the same ment were made. time, the number of policies issued fell by The annual figures for premiums and 4.3%. Between 1 June 2003 and 31 December was in excess of 211 billion rubles. claims payment are set out in Figure 7. 2009, more than 205 million CMTPL policies When CMTPL insurance came into force, In 2009: were issued, more than 9 million claimants For every 100 rubles in CMTPL insurance the average premium paid was 1,880 rubles have received compensation flowing a road • 35.2 million policies were issued; premium collected in 2009, 65.6 rubles was and it has since then increased to 2,440 accident and total claims payments made • 85.8 billion Rubles of premium was paid out in claims. rubles. If these figures are adjusted to take 10 11 Average CMTPL claim paid Leading regions of Russia in CMTPL claims payments 2009 0 Fig. 10 RAMI member insurance companies by size of equity capital Fig. 12 rubles (9.2% of premium) and 16% between Both the Rostov Region and Samara 500 million rubles and 1 billion rubles (7.7%). Region made claim payments which totaled In contrast, 80.5% of premium was collected 2.8% of the total — (1.385 billion rubles and by the 18% of companies that have capital 1.366 billion rubles respectively). above 1 billion rubles (Figure 11). Turning to the Federal Districts, there is no Figure 12 shows the regions of Russian doubt that the leading Federal District in Federation where most CMTPL claims are terms of both premiums collected and claims Fig. 11 paid by insurance companies. paid is the Central Federal District where 31,607 million rubles of premium was col- In 2009, the three regions with the most lected (36.7% of the total) and 14,702 million CMTPL claims payments were Moscow Ñity, rubles claims were paid (30.1% of the total). with 6,415 million rubles (13.1% of the total), The details are included in Figure 13 and 14, account of inflation in the same period, the by 1.8% over 2008 (Figure 10). St Petersburg, with payments of 3,769 million result is that in real terms, the average premi- the data being derived from RAMI form 2 for 140 insurance companies held licenses to rubles (7.7% of the total) and the Moscow um has fallen by 32% (Figure 9). 2009. carry on CMTPL insurance business at 31 Region with 2,967 rubles (6.1% of the total). In 2009, 17% of total premiums were col- It should be noted that the increase in December 2009. The average capital of In the following regions, total claim pay- lected in the Volga Federal District (14,596 average premium in 2009 was influenced CMTPL insurance companies was 610 million ments of between 1.5 and 1.8 billion rubles million rubles), 11.7% in the North Western by a small increase in CMTPL premium tar- rubles4. 24% of insurance companies carrying were made (3.1% to 3.7% of the total): the Federal District (10,106 million rubles), 11% iff rates in those regions of Russia where on CMTPL business had capital of less than Krasnodar Region (1,811 million rubles), the from the Siberian Federal District (9,432 mil- loss ratios were above 100.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2009
    BOFIT BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2009 Bank of Finland, BOFIT Institute for Economies in Transition BOFIT Weekly Editor-in-Chief Seija Lainela Bank of Finland BOFIT – Institute for Economies in Transition PO Box 160 FIN-00101 Helsinki Phone: +358 10 831 2268 Fax: +358 10 831 2294 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bof.fi/bofit The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank of Finland. BOFIT Weekly --- Russia 2009 1.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 1/2009 Rouble continues to weaken. Growth continued to fade in November. Economic development ministry scenarios see signifi-cantly slowing economy in coming year. Government identifies enterprises crucial to economic system. Four trillion roubles in financial sector support already released. 9.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 2/2009 Russian oil production in decline. Russia won’t openly commit to OPEC production cuts. Russia and Ukraine lock horns again on pricing of natural gas contracts and transmission fees. Stimulus legislation enters into force. 16.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 3/2009 Rouble’s decline continues after market reopens January 11. Current account surplus shrank substantially in 4Q08. Moscow stock exchanges post worst performance in a decade. Economic woes impairing banking sector growth. Inflation subsided towards the end of 2008. 23.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 4/2009 CBR announces new rouble policy. 2008 federal budget remained strongly in the black. Finance ministry alters this year’s federal budget. Changes in custom tariffs to support the economy. Government approves 2020 development plan. 30.1.2009 BOFIT Weekly – Russia 5/2009 Russian central bank modifies exchange rate policy.
    [Show full text]
  • First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation I. Shuvalov Visits IIB’S Headquarters June 9, 2016
    Budapest, Fő utca 1, H-1011, Hungary Phone: : +36 1 727 8888 Fax: : +7 (499) 975-20-70 E-mail: [email protected] First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation I. Shuvalov visits IIB’s headquarters June 9, 2016 Yesterday, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Igor Shuvalov held a meeting with the members of the Board of the International Investment Bank (IIB) at the Bank’s headquarters in Moscow. Together they discussed IIB’s prospects and results of its reform launched in 2012 as well as the implementation of the most important projects with Russian participation. The renewed IIB is reoriented towards project finance with an emphasis on supporting small and medium-sized businesses, export-import operations and infrastructural projects. IIB’s Chairman, Nikolay Kosov, informed I. Shuvalov that “since the end of 2012, the Bank has signed investment agreements totalling almost EUR 640 million and has increased its assets by more than 100% while continuing to grow steadily. The IIB has expanded geographically by admitting Hungary as a new member and opening the first representative office in its history – European Regional Office in Bratislava”. Igor Shuvalov emphasized the Bank's successes over the past years, especially in relation to setting up a modern risk management system and expanding its portfolio of support provided to small and medium-sized businesses. Meeting with IIB’s management, the First Deputy Prime Minister called for the implementation of a strategy aiming to create an entirely new financial platform with new capacity and possibilities for entrepreneurs in the member states.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP the Case of Russia
    Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP The Case of Russia V.D. Khizhniak St. Petersburg Publishing House of SPbSPU 2012 1 Khizhniak, Vladimir International Entrepreneurship: the Case of Russia. A manual for students. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbSPU, 2012. This manual is intended for students interested in international business. The theoretical concepts and practical issues of international entrepreneurship are considered with reference to Russia, one of the most promising sites for international business. ISBN © St. Petersburg State Plytechnical University, 2012 2 CONTENTS Chapter 1 General Characteristic of International Entrepreneurship 6 Chapter 2 The Russian Marketplace in a Global Context 24 Chapter 3 Business Environment and General Terms of Business 46 Chapter 4 Promotion of Foreign Investment 64 Chapter 5 Entrepreneurial Law and Commercial Disputes Resolution 84 Chapter 6 Setting up a Business Abroad 105 Chapter 7 Importing and Exporting 126 Chapter 8 Finance and Banking Environment 140 Chapter 9 Capital Markets and Securities 160 Chapter 10 Principal Taxes and Tax System 183 Chapter 11 Labor Hiring and Labor Relations 205 Chapter 12 International Marketing and Sales 216 Chapter 13 Business Risks and Insurance 241 Chapter 14 Business Culture 260 Bibliography 279 3 PREFACE This manual is developed for students of business colleges who seek to enhance their knowledge of international entrepreneurship. Experience has shown that processes of globalization and internationalization are developing so rapidly in recent years that even if students majoring in business does not intend to be involved in international business activity, they nevertheless will encounter problems relating to globalization and internationalization processes in their professional activity.
    [Show full text]
  • BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2008
    BOFIT BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2008 Bank of Finland, BOFIT Institute for Economies in Transition BOFIT Weekly Editor-in-Chief Seija Lainela Bank of Finland BOFIT – Institute for Economies in Transition PO Box 160 FIN-00101 Helsinki Phone: +358 10 831 2268 Fax: +358 10 831 2294 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bof.fi/bofit Helsinki 2009 The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank of Finland. BOFIT Weekly – Russia 2008 4.1.2008 BOFIT Weekly 1/2008 Russia, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan agree on construction of a new pipeline. Russia’s foreign debt stock climbing rapidly, even as overall levels of indebtedness remain low. Russian stock markets showed modest gains in 2007. 11.1.2008 BOFIT Weekly 2/2008 Russian inflation climbed to 11.9 % in 2007. Wages continue to rise rapidly. Income disparity in Russia has increased only slightly over the last seven years. 18.1.2008 BOFIT Weekly 3/2008 Rouble continues to strengthen. Current account surplus shrinks, while capital keeps pouring into Russia. Foreign currency reserves continue to grow rapidly. 25.1.2008 BOFIT Weekly 4/2008 Economic policy as presidential election approaches. Investment rules for stabilisation fund assets approved. Project to run gas pipeline under the Black Sea to Bulgaria moves ahead. 1.2.2008 BOFIT Weekly 5/2008 Consumption and investment up strongly in 2007. Russian car market expands rapidly. List of presidential candidates confirmed. 8.2.2008 BOFIT Weekly 6/2008 Consumption and investment lifted Russian economic growth in 2007. Inflation accelerated in January.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 in Eurasia April 2021 (PDF)
    COVID-19 IN EURASIA PONARS EURASIA POLICY PERSPECTIVES APRIL 2021 PONARS Eurasia is an international network of scholars advancing new approaches to research on security, politics, economics, and society in Russia and Eurasia. PONARS Eurasia is based at the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) at the George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. This publication was made possible in part by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. Program Directors: Henry E. Hale and Marlene Laruelle Editors: Margaret Evered, Madeline McCann, and Alexander Schmemann PONARS Eurasia Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) Elliott School of International Affairs The George Washington University 1957 E Street NW, Suite 412 Washington, DC 20052 Tel: (202) 994-6340 www.ponarseurasia.org © PONARS Eurasia 2021. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Part I. Facing the Unknown: Post-Soviet Responses to COVID-19 Post-Soviet State Responses to COVID-19 Making or Breaking Authoritarianism?.........................3 Marlene Laruelle and Madeline McCann The Russian Power Vertical and the COVID-19 Challenge: The Trajectories of Regional Responses.....................................................................................................................................................9 Regina Smyth, Gulnaz Sharafutdinova, Timothy Model, and Aiden Klein Ukraine Rides High While COVID-19 Lays Low: But
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian State and Russian Energy Companies in the Post-Soviet Region, 1992–2012
    Mutually supportive? The Russian State and Russian Energy Companies in the Post-Soviet Region, 1992–2012 By Ingerid Maria Opdahl A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies Department of Political Science and International Studies School of Government and Society College of Social Sciences University of Birmingham May 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis investigates relations between five Russian energy companies – RAO UES/Inter RAO (electricity), Minatom/Rosatom (nuclear energy), Lukoil (oil), Transneft (oil pipelines) and Gazprom (gas) – and the Russian state from 1992 to 2012, with particular regard to state–company interaction over Russian foreign policy and companies’ activities in the post-Soviet region. The argument is that, due to the institutional legacies of the Soviet system, state–company interaction over foreign policy and energy operations abroad was part of their interaction over the Russian state’s institutional development. The study is based on the conceptual framework of social orders developed by North, Wallis and Weingast (NWW).
    [Show full text]
  • PB06-3 Russia's Challenges As Chair of The
    Policy Briefs IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS N U M B E R P B 0 6 - 3 M A R C H 2 0 0 6 Russia is moving in the opposite direction. Moscow’s leader- Russia’s Challenges ship of the G-8 reduces the credibility and the relevance of the group to zero.” as Chair of the G-8 Does Russia possess sufficient economic strength and politi- cal freedom to qualify? What does President Vladimir Putin want? Anders Åslund Can the G-8 summit, to be held in St. Petersburg on July 15–17, be fruitful, or will it be an embarrassment for all involved? This Anders Åslund joined the Institute for International Economics as a se- policy brief aims to clarify the challenges and suggest how they nior fellow in January 2006. He is author of Building Capitalism: The can be handled, if Russia’s chairmanship is to make sense. Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc (Cambridge University Press, 2002) and coauthor of Revolution in Orange: The Origins of Ukraine’s IS RUSSIA QUALIFIED TO CHAIR THE G-8? Democratic Breakthrough (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006). He is grateful to Fred Bergsten, Martin Baily, Albert Bressand, Anna Gelpern, Morris Goldstein, Randall Henning, Gary Hufbauer, Jacob Kirkeg- Russia’s integration into the G-7 has been gradual. Soviet aard, Nicholas Lardy, Catherine Mann, Michael McFaul, Michael Mussa, President Mikhail Gorbachev was first to meet with the G-7 Jeffrey Schott, Stephen Sestanovich, Edwin Truman, John Williamson, and leaders, on the sidelines of their summit in London in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Elite Under Putin by Dmitry Gorenburg
    The Political Elite Under Putin By Dmitry Gorenburg Executive Summary Russia’s political elite has undergone relatively little change under Vladimir Putin’s rule. Only sixty people have been ranked twentieth or higher at least once between 2000 and 2019 in the annual Nezavisimaya Gazeta list of the most politically influential Russians. Eighteen people have appeared on every list during this period. The greatest shift in elite composition occurred between 2007 and 2008, with smaller shifts around the presidential elections of 2004 and 2012. Most of the political elite originate in the government bureaucracy in Moscow or St. Petersburg or came to their positions of influence through personal ties to Vladimir Putin, either in St. Petersburg or in the security services. Only ten percent came to power through electoral politics; another ten percent are businessmen who made their money independently of any connections to Vladimir Putin. The elite is fairly evenly divided between individuals who have political influence solely because of their positions in government and individuals who have influence outside of their official role. People in the first group generally drop off the list quickly after leaving government or being demoted, and people in the second group tend to retain influence regardless of their position at any given time and remain influential for extended periods, even after departing government service. Introduction For most of the post-Soviet period, the newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta has conducted a monthly survey of Russian political experts. This survey asks its respondents to rank the 100 most politically influential Russians in the previous month. Throughout this period, the newspaper has also published an annual ranking,1 based on the average rank of those mentioned during the previous calendar year.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of the Political Leaders of the Medvedev Administration
    Biographies of the political leaders of the Medvedev Administration DMITRY MEDVEDEV President of the Russian Federation since May 2008 The latest Presidential elections in Russia, held in March, 2008, were preceded by a huge mass-media debate over the future successor of Vladimir Putin. The end of 2007 marked the period of one year and seven months during which Putin’s public approval ratings did not drop below 50%. For many people his strong political leadership gave rise to the misapprehension that he was going to amend the Constitution and stay on for a third term. Political experts, in turn, were prophesying a great power vacuum if Putin were to step down. The uncertainty came to an end on 10 December 2007 when Putin officially announced his support for Dmitry Medvedev as the Russian presidential candidate. By that time, Medvedev was occupying the post of First Deputy Prime Minister and was thus in charge of several national projects aimed at social development. In general, it would be unfair to say that Medvedev was unknown to the Russian public in 2008. Nonetheless, his image of an aver- age politician merging into the background of Putin’s admin- istration did not usually attract much attention. However, in December, 2007 public interest in him skyrocketed and for the rest of the electoral campaign he remained the centre of public attention. Dmitry Medvedev was born on September 14, 1965 in Leningrad (now St Petersburg). Both his parents were uni- Economic Forum World versity professors and they encouraged their son’s inter- Dmitry Medvédev est in science from an early age.
    [Show full text]
  • January 29, 2020 the Honorable Joseph R. Biden President United
    January 29, 2020 The Honorable Joseph R. Biden President United States of America The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear President Biden: I am writing to you to encourage the United States to sanction corrupt Russian allies of President Putin as part of your overall approach to Russia. I was encouraged by your initial call with Mr. Putin and your recognition that Alexey Navalny’s arrest was unwarranted and an unjust attempt to silence Russia’s most prominent opposition leader. I’ve worked with Navalny since 2010 and served as Executive Director of his Anti-Corruption Foundation, which exposed staggering corruption within the Putin regime. Before Navalny’s arrest, our team prepared a video that exposed Putin’s wealth and hubris. The video focuses on a $1.3 billion palace that Putin’s allies -- businessmen and heads of large state-owned companies who owe their positions to Putin -- built for him personally. A string of investigations shows that the same oligarchs who built Putin’s palace also supply his mistresses and their parents, and Putin’s children, with yachts, apartments and multi-million dollar-a-year-jobs at the companies they control. Navalny’s video expose has been watched over 100 million times. That’s more than half the population of Russia. This helps explain why so many Russians -- young and old alike -- have taken to the streets to protest the regime. Everyone understands that as long as Putin’s kleptocratic regime controls Russia, the people of Russia have no future. For years, Alexey Navalny has advocated sanctions against individuals who play key roles in aiding and abetting Putin and who take the lead in the persecution of those who seek to express their opinions freely and expose corruption in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dual Structure and Mentality of Vladimir Putin´S Power Coalition: A
    This report analyses the Russian authoritarian regime that emerged under Vladimir Putin and attempts to give a wider context to the so-called FSB-ization of the Russian government. The Dual Structure and Mentality of Joris van Bladel The first part of the report deals with Putin’s main achievements in domestic and foreign policy and examines the extent to which state policy has fulfilled the aspirations of the Russian public. The much-needed stability and Vladimir Putin’s Power Coalition security that Putin has brought to the country seem to outweigh the fact that the government has veered towards authoritarianism. The degree to which Russian society has truly been taken over by the FSB is critically examined, A legacy for Medvedev and this process of FSB-ization is explained in a wider social and historical context. DR. JORIS VAN BLADEL The second part aims to bring some insight into the current political dynamic by examining the power relations in the coalition and the mentalities typical of the major factions: the ‘siloviki’ and the liberal. In particular, the ‘siloviki’ are critically examined with regard to their history, their typical modes of thinking, and their rise to influence. The very notion of ‘siloviki’ is given a more precise explanation by showing why they have come to power, whom the term ‘siloviki’ should actually be applied to, what their mode of thinking is like, and how PowerCoalition Putin’s Vladimir of Mentality and Dual Structure The influential they are likely to be in the future. The study then focuses on the actual siloviki faction: its members, its role, and its influence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Nature of Russia's Decision to Join APEC
    ST. PETERSBURG INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM JUNE 16–18, 2011 Business round table ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION: THE EVOLUTION AND CONTINUATION OF A SUBSTANTIAL AGENDA JUNE 18, 2011 — 09:30–11:30, Pavilion 5, Conference Hall 5.2 St. Petersburg, Russia 2011 In 2012 Russia is taking on the chairmanship of the APEC forum for the first time. Apart from the active preparation of the locations for key events (meetings of APEC leaders and ministers), Russia‘s chairmanship is an important opportunity to hold intensive discussions with APEC participants concerning future issues, including trade liberalization and investment in the region. Russia‘s chairmanship takes on a special importance insofar as Russia will be following developed countries (Singapore, Japan, the USA) in drawing up the agenda, before the chairmanship passes to developing countries, beginning with Indonesia. Moderator: Igor Ivanov, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Russian Federation, Professor, MGIMO-University; Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (1998—2004) Panelists: John Beyrle, Ambassador of the United States of America to the Russian Federation Vladimir Miklushevsky, Rector of the Far Eastern Federal University Muhamad Noor, Executive Director of the APEC Secretariat Gennady Ovechko, Ambassador at Large, Senior Official for the Russian Federation at the APEC Forum Muhammad Hatta Rajasa, Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Igor Shuvalov, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Andrei Slepnev, Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Kurt Tong, Senior Official for APEC I. Ivanov: Ladies and gentlemen, I am very pleased to preside over today's round table discussion on the problems of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).
    [Show full text]