DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) – Updated December 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) – Updated December 2011 ICES WGITMO REPORT 2011 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2011/ACOM:29 Report of the Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) – Updated December 2011 16 - 18 March 2011 Nantes, France International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2011. Report of the Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO), 16 - 18 March 2011, Nantes, France. ICES CM 2011/ACOM:29. 180 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2011 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGITMO REPORT 2011 i Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................. 1 1 Opening of the meeting ....................................................................................... 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ........................................................................................ 2 3 WGITMO Terms of Reference............................................................................ 2 4 Progress in relation to Terms of Reference ...................................................... 3 4.1 Term of Reference a) ........................................................................................... 3 4.1.1 Belgium (see also National Report in Annex 5.1) ........................................ 4 4.1.2 Canada (see also National Report in Annex 5.2) .......................................... 4 4.1.3 Croatia (by correspondence, see also National Report in Annex 5.3) ....... 4 4.1.4 Denmark (by correspondence, see also National Report in Annex 5.4) ... 5 4.1.5 Estonia (see also National Report in Annex 5.5) .......................................... 5 4.1.6 Finland (see also National Report in Annex 5.6) .......................................... 5 4.1.7 France (see also National Report in Annex 5.7) ........................................... 5 4.1.8 Germany (see also National Report in Annex 5.8) ....................................... 5 4.1.9 Italy (see also National Report in Annex 5.9) ............................................... 6 4.1.10 Lithuania (see also National Report in Annex 5.10) .................................. 6 4.1.11 The Netherlands (see also National Report in Annex 5.11) ...................... 6 4.1.12 Norway (see also National Report in Annex 5.12) ..................................... 7 4.1.13 Poland (by correspondence, see also National Report in Annex 5.13).... 7 4.1.14 Portugal (see also National Report in Annex 5.14) .................................... 7 4.1.15 Spain (see also National Report in Annex 5.15) ......................................... 7 4.1.16 Sweden (see also National Report in Annex 5.16) ..................................... 8 4.1.17 United Kingdom (see also National Report in Annex 5.17) ..................... 8 4.1.18 United States of America (by correspondence, see also National Report in Annex 5.18) ................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Term of Reference b) ........................................................................................... 9 4.3 Term of Reference c) ......................................................................................... 10 4.4 Term of Reference d) ......................................................................................... 12 4.5 Term of Reference e) ......................................................................................... 12 4.6 Term of Reference f) .......................................................................................... 14 4.7 Term of Reference g) ......................................................................................... 15 4.8 Term of Reference h) ......................................................................................... 15 4.9 Term of Reference i) .......................................................................................... 16 4.10 Additional Term of References ...................................................................... 16 4.11 Other discussion items ................................................................................... 19 4.11.1 Name and subject of the expert group ...................................................... 19 4.11.2 Network approaches to studying aquatic invasive species in Canada (presentation by Hugh MacIsaac) ......................................................................... 19 4.11.3 Early detection and identification of aquatic invasive species using molecular methods (presentation by Hugh MacIsaac and Aibin Zhan) ......... 20 ii ICES WGITMO REPORT 2011 4.11.4 “I just can’t bring myself to kill it” – How human weakness leads to the introduction and dispersal of non-native fishes (by Gordon H. Copp) .... 21 4.11.5 The impact of the invasive comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi in the North Sea (a PhD study as part of the MEMO project) (by Lies Vansteenbrugge Lies, Hostens Kris, Johan Robbens, Vincx Magda and the MEMO consortium) .............................................................................................................. 21 5 Closing of the meeting ...................................................................................... 22 Annex 1. List of participants ................................................................................ 23 Annex 2. Meeting agenda ..................................................................................... 26 Annex 3 Additional Terms of References .......................................................... 30 Annex 4 Proposed Terms of Reference for 2012 ............................................... 32 Annex 5. National reports ..................................................................................... 34 5.1 Belgium .............................................................................................................. 34 5.2 Canada ................................................................................................................ 36 5.3 Croatia ................................................................................................................ 73 5.4 Denmark ............................................................................................................ 76 5.5 Estonia ................................................................................................................ 82 5.6 Finland ............................................................................................................... 87 5.7 France .................................................................................................................. 89 5.8 Germany............................................................................................................. 98 5.9 Italy ................................................................................................................... 105 5.10 Lithuania ........................................................................................................ 110 5.11 The Netherlands ........................................................................................... 117 5.12 Norway ........................................................................................................... 119 5.13 Poland ............................................................................................................. 121 5.14 Portugal .......................................................................................................... 124 5.15 Spain ............................................................................................................... 134 5.16 Sweden ........................................................................................................... 137 5.17 United Kingdom ........................................................................................... 143 5.18 United States of America ............................................................................ 150 Annex 6 - Report on the different approaches taken by ICES coun- tries on targeted fisheries of non-indigenous species and the im- ICES WGITMO REPORT 2011 iii pact that these fisheries have had in reducing the spread and abundance of non-indigenous species ............................................................. 160 ICES WGITMO REPORT 2011 1 Executive summary The 2011 meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Ma- rine Organisms (WGITMO) was held in IFREMER, Nantes, France, March 16-18, with Laurence Miossec as host and Henn Ojaveer as chair. The meeting was attended by 24 participants from 14 countries. Three participants contributed to the meeting by correspondence. The participants were from Belgium, Canada, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Swe- den and United Kingdom while Croatia, Denmark, Poland and the United States of America contributed by correspondence. Apologies were received from Lyndsay Brown (UK). The objectives of the meeting were to update information and discuss
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recipes for Your Sustainable Seafood
    Recipes for your sustainable seafood Not sure how to cook what’s on offer at your local fish merchant? Here we recommend the fish that are sustainable to buy and suggest some recipes to try with them. Brown crab Cancer pagurus Brown crab, also known as edible crab, is the heaviest British crab. About a third of the weight of the crab is meat, two thirds is white and third is brown. It's used to make 'dressed crab' where the shell is cleaned out and used as the dish. Crab is also used to make fish cakes, crab sticks and paste. Brown crabs mature at about 10 years and averagely lives for 30 years, but some have been known to go on till they're 100! The vast majority of brown crabs in the UK are caught by potting. This is a low impact and relatively selective method of fishing, any bycatch or discards can be returned alive to the sea with high survival rates. Brown crab from the Inshore Potting Agreement Area in Devon, the Western Channel or Cornwall are the best choices for crab in the UK. Avoid eating crabs below the minimum landing size (13-14 cm in most areas of the UK) and crab claws, unless it is certain they have been removed from the animal after landing. Egg-bearing or "berried" females should be avoided at all times to allow them to spawn. (Information source: MSC Good Fish Guide) Brown crab Recipes - These four recipes from The Guardian include jungle curry with crab and a spring salad.
    [Show full text]
  • Odia: Dhudhiya Magara / Sorrah Magara / Haladia Magara
    FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka 2018 ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120 (India) & Chilika Development Authority C- 11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751 014 (India) FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta, M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das, A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka Photo editing: Sujit Choudhury and Manavendra Roy ISBN: 978-81-938914-0-7 Citation: Suresh, et al. 2018. Fish and shellfish diversity and its sustainable management in Chilika lake, ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar. 376p. Copyright: © 2018. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (CIFRI), Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holders. Photo credits: Sujit Choudhury, Manavendra Roy, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, V. R. Suresh, S. K. Karna, M. Mukherjee and Abdul Rasid Published by: Chief Executive Chilika Development Authority C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 014 (Odisha) Cover design by: S. K. Mohanty Designed and printed by: S J Technotrade Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landing Obligation and Its Implications on the Control of Fisheries
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries. AUTHORS Ocean Governance Consulting: Christopher Hedley Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science: Tom Catchpole, Ana Ribeiro Santos RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Marcus Breuer Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE Adrienn Borka Lyna Pärt LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in September 2015. © European Union, 2015. Print ISBN 978-92-823-7938-7 doi:10.2861/694624 QA-02-15-709-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-823-7939-4 doi:10.2861/303902 QA-02-15-709-EN-N This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES FISHERIES THE LANDING OBLIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE CONTROL OF FISHERIES STUDY Abstract This study reviews the impacts of the new Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) rules requiring catches in regulated fisheries to be landed and counted against quotas of each Member State ("the landing obligation and requiring that catch of species subject to the landing obligation below a minimum conservation reference size be restricted to purposes other than direct human consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Shorefishes of the Canary Islands
    AMERICAN MUSEUM Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 2824, pp. 1-49, figs. 1-5 August 7, 1985 An Annotated Checklist of the Shorefishes of the Canary Islands JAMES K. DOOLEY,' JAMES VAN TASSELL,2 AND ALBERTO BRITO3 ABSTRACT The inshore canarian fish fauna includes 217 The fish fauna contains elements from the Med- species from 67 families. Fifteen new records (in- iterranean-Atlantic and West African areas, but cluding two undescribed species) and numerous does not exhibit any clear transition. Three en- rare species have been included. The number of demic species of fishes have been confirmed. The fishes documented from the Canary Islands and families with the greatest diversification include: nearby waters total approximately 400 species. Sparidae (21 species), Scorpaenidae (1 1), Gobiidae This figure includes some 200 pelagic, deepwater, (1 1), Blenniidae (10), Serranidae (9), Carangidae and elasmobranch species not treated in this study. (9), Muraenidae (7), and Labridae (7). RESUMEN La fauna ictiologica de las aguas costeras se las en el presente trabajo. La fauna contiene elemen- Islas Canarias comprende 217 especies de 67 fa- tos de las regiones Atlantico-Mediterranea y Oeste milias. Se incluyen quince citas nuevas (incluyen Africana, pero no muestra una clara transicion. dos especies no describen) y numerosas especies Tres especie endemica existe. Las familias con ma- raras. El nu'mero de peces de las aguas canarias se yor diversificacion son: Sparidae (21 especies), eleva aproximadamente a 400 especies. Este nui- Scorpaenidae (1 1), Gobiidae (1 1), Blenniidae (10), mero incluye casi 200 especies pelagicas, de aguas Serranidae (9), Carangidae (9), Muraenidae (7), y profundas y elasmobranquios que no se discuten Labridae (7).
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the ICES/IOC/IMO Working Group on Ballast and Other Ship Vectors (WGBOSV)
    ICES WGBOSV REPORT 201 1 ICES Advisory Committee ICES CM 201 1 /ACOM:28 Report of the ICES/IOC/IMO Working Group on Ballast and Other Ship Vectors (WGBOSV) 14-16 March 2011 Nantes, France International Council for ICES the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour CIEM l'Exploration de la Mer International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denm ark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2011. Report of the ICES/IOC/IMO Working Group on Ballast and Other Ship Vectors (WGBOSV) ,14-16 March 2011, Nantes, France. ICES CM 2011/ACOM:28. 103 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen­ eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2011 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGBOSV REPORT 201 1 Contents Executive summary........................................................................................................................1 1 Opening of the meeting ........................................................................................................ 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ........................................................................................................2 3 WGBOSV Terms of Reference
    [Show full text]
  • Canales Et Al 2015
    Fisheries Research 161 (2015) 261–268 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres Changes in the size-structure of a multispecies pelagic fishery off Northern Chile a,∗ b c,d e T. Mariella Canales , Richard Law , Rodrigo Wiff , Julia L. Blanchard a Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Departamento de Evaluación de Recursos, Blanco 839, Valparaíso, Chile b The University of York, York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, Ron Cooke Hub, York YO10 5EG, UK c Copas Sur-Austral, Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Oceanografía, Barrio Universitario s/n, Chile d Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Alameda 340, Santiago, Chile e The University of Sheffield, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Size-based indicators are important tools for understanding how environmental variability and fishing Received 13 February 2014 impact on marine populations and communities. Ideally, they would standardise fishery-independent Received in revised form 8 August 2014 survey data. However, this is not possible in many of the world’s ecosystems with important commercial Accepted 9 August 2014 fisheries. Using fishery-dependent data we investigated changes in the size–structure of pelagic catches off Northern Chile and whether or not these changes are influenced by the environment. We computed Keywords: single- and multispecies, size-based fishery indicators (SBFIs) from 1990 to 2008 for the main commercial Body size species, anchovy (Engraulis ringens), sardine (Sardinops sagax), jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) and Fishery Multispecies mackerel (Scomber japonicus).
    [Show full text]
  • Lactarius Lactarius (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) Synonyms Loc. Names : Bukko (Sin); Chilanker (Bal) White Milkfish (En) FAO
    click for previous page - 38 - BONY FISHES LACTARIIDAE Lactarius lactarius (Bloch Schneider, 1801) Synonyms Lactarius delicatulus Valenciennes, 1833 Loc. names : Bukko (Sin); chilanker (Bal) White milkfish (En) FAO names : En - False trivially Fr - Péliau chanos Sp - Pagapa Size : Max.: 40 cm; common to 30 cm Fishing gear : Caught mainly with bottom trawls, seines and traps Habitat and biology : Found in various types of habitats, usually in waters shallower than 100 m. Feeds on bottom- living organisms Interest to fisheries : A popular fish, sold fresh or dried salted. The reported catches from Pakistan totalled 650 t in 1982 (FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics, 1982) RACHYCENTRIDAE Rachycentron canadum (Linnaeus, 1766) Synonyms : None Loc. names : Sanghra, Aangh (Sin); Sanglor (Bal) Black kingfish (En) FAO names : En - Cobia Fr - Mafou Sp - Cobia Size : Max.: 200 cm; common to 110 cm Fishing gear : Caught with handlines, bottom trawls, driftnets and floating gillnets Habitat and biology : This is an essentially pelagic species, sometimes occurring over shallow coral reefs and off rocky shores; also in estuaries. Feeds on crabs, squid, fishes and sea snakes. Sexually ripe specimens found in March and April along the Baluchistan coast. Interest to fisheries : A rather common species, with a very delicate flesh, usually sold fresh, or dry-salted for export to Sri Lanka. The catches reported in the Handbook of Fisheries Statistics of Pakistan (1973-83) range from 606 t (1980) to 1 971 t (1982), with an average of 1 231 t ECHENEIDIDAE Echeneis naucrates Linnaeus, 1758 dorsal view of head Synonyms : None showing cephalic disc Loc. names : Masi (Sin); Li-ching (Bal) remora (En) FAO names : En - Live sharksucker Fr - Rémora commun Sp - Pegatimón Size : Max.: to more than 75 cm Fishing gear : Caught mainly with handlines, but more often captured attached to the body of its host Habitat and biology : Formed in shallow, coastal waters, often free-swimming but will attach temporarily to a wide range of host such as sharks, seaturtles and ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries
    1 Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Seafood Watch Guiding Principles ...................................................................................................... 3 Seafood Watch Criteria and Scoring Methodology for Fisheries ........................................................... 5 Criterion 1 – Impacts on the Species Under Assessment ...................................................................... 8 Factor 1.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................... 9 Factor 1.2 Fishing Mortality ......................................................................................................... 19 Criterion 2 – Impacts on Other Capture Species ................................................................................ 22 Factor 2.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................. 26 Factor 2.2 Fishing Mortality ......................................................................................................... 27 Factor 2.3 Modifying Factor: Discards and Bait Use .................................................................... 29 Criterion
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Indian Ocean, Western C-51 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollusques
    481 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Indian Ocean, Western C-51 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Océan Indien, ouest (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Océano Índico, occidental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Kelee shad Hilsa kelee 24 2 306 3 534 3 513 4 151 5 227 3 765 4 616 Hilsa shad Tenualosa ilisha 24 8 257 4 024 6 123 3 233 7 345 5 305 5 617 Bloch's gizzard shad Nematalosa nasus 24 ... 93 15 71 196 263 216 Milkfish Chanos chanos 25 113 101 122 159 135 156 322 Barramundi(=Giant seaperch) Lates calcarifer 25 - - - 0 0 0 - Leopard flounder Bothus pantherinus 31 96 70 91 124 91 93 95 Lefteye flounders nei Bothidae 31 73 78 20 85 1 1 15 Mud sole Austroglossus pectoralis 31 - - - - - 19 - Tonguefishes Cynoglossidae 31 1 383 984 907 907 909 1 002 1 011 Indian halibut Psettodes erumei 31 2 365 2 943 3 792 4 191 5 050 4 975 3 808 Flatfishes nei Pleuronectiformes 31 15 924 13 630 13 582 14 658 22 782 17 697 21 709 Unicorn cod Bregmaceros mcclellandi 32 2 643 1 322 2 717 1 597 852 674 636 Cape hakes Merluccius capensis,M.paradox. 32 1 3 5 5 3 3 3 Gadiformes nei Gadiformes 32 - - - - - 55 - Bombay-duck Harpadon nehereus 33 101 936 135 340 158 829 152 838 185 088 218 639 178 003 Greater lizardfish Saurida tumbil 33 3 634 2 655 4 167 3 656 2 575 2 564 3 030 Brushtooth lizardfish
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda, Aoridae), First Encounter of Non-Indigenous Amphipod in the Lam Ta Khong River, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, North-Eastern Thailand
    Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e46452 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e46452 Alien Species Profile Grandidierella gilesi Chilton, 1921 (Amphipoda, Aoridae), first encounter of non-indigenous amphipod in the Lam Ta Khong River, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, North-eastern Thailand Koraon Wongkamhaeng‡, Pongrat Dumrongrojwattana§, Myung-Hwa Shin|, Chaichat Boonyanusith¶ ‡ Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand § Burapha University, Bangsaen, Thailand | National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon, South Korea ¶ Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand Corresponding author: Koraon Wongkamhaeng ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev Received: 10 Sep 2019 | Accepted: 04 Mar 2020 | Published: 06 Mar 2020 Citation: Wongkamhaeng K, Dumrongrojwattana P, Shin M-H, Boonyanusith C (2020) Grandidierella gilesi Chilton, 1921 (Amphipoda, Aoridae), first encounter of non-indigenous amphipod in the Lam Ta Khong River, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, North-eastern Thailand. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e46452. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e46452 Abstract The first record of the non-indigenous, alien amphipod Grandidierella gilesi in the Lam Ta Khong River is presented. Previously, this Indo-Pacific amphipod had only been reported in the Indian Ocean, the Andaman Sea, the Gulf of Thailand, the South China Sea and Australia. In Thailand, G. gilesi was previously reported in an isolated pond in Bangkok. The present study constitutes another record of this species in inland water. The characteristics and variation of G. gilesi, observed in this study, are also discussed. All the specimens described here are preserved at the Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Natural History Museum, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand. Keywords Aorid amphipod, Crustacea, non-indigenous, aquaculture, Lam Ta Khong River, Thailand © Wongkamhaeng K et al.
    [Show full text]