DOCSLIB.ORG

Ices Wgitmo Report 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ices Wgitmo Report 2013 ICES WGITMO REPORT 2013 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2013/ACOM:30 Report of the ICES Working Group on Introduc- tion and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 20 - 22 March 2013 Montreal, Canada International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2013. Report of the ICES Working Group on Introduction and Transfers of Ma- rine Organisms (WGITMO), 20 - 22 March 2013, Montreal, Canada. ICES CM 2013/ACOM:30. 149 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2013 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGITMO REPORT 2013 i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 2 3 WGITMO Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 2 4 Progress in relation to Terms of Reference ............................................................... 4 4.1 Term of Reference a) ............................................................................................. 4 4.1.1 Belgium ..................................................................................................... 4 4.1.2 Canada ....................................................................................................... 5 4.1.3 Croatia ....................................................................................................... 5 4.1.4 Denmark .................................................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Estonia ....................................................................................................... 5 4.1.6 Finland ....................................................................................................... 5 4.1.7 France ........................................................................................................ 6 4.1.8 Germany .................................................................................................... 6 4.1.9 Greece ........................................................................................................ 6 4.1.10 Italy ............................................................................................................ 6 4.1.11 Lithuania ................................................................................................... 6 4.1.12 Norway ...................................................................................................... 7 4.1.13 Poland (by correspondence) ................................................................... 7 4.1.14 Portugal ..................................................................................................... 7 4.1.15 Spain .......................................................................................................... 7 4.1.16 Sweden ...................................................................................................... 7 4.1.17 United Kingdom ...................................................................................... 7 4.1.18 United States ............................................................................................. 8 4.2 Term of Reference b) ............................................................................................ 8 4.3 Term of Reference c) ........................................................................................... 16 4.4 Term of Reference d) .......................................................................................... 18 4.5 Term of Reference e) ........................................................................................... 21 4.6 Term of Reference f) ........................................................................................... 25 4.7 Term of Reference g) ........................................................................................... 26 4.8 Term of Reference h) .......................................................................................... 27 4.9 Term of Reference i) ............................................................................................ 31 4.10 Other discussion items and any other business ............................................. 33 4.10.1 Forecasting the ecological impacts of aquatic invasions: A major challenge for risk assessment (by Anthony Ricciardi, Redpath Museum & McGill School of Environment, McGill University, Canada). .............................................................................. 33 4.10.2 Molecular identification of UK populations of Didemnum vexillum (by Lyndsay Brown). .............................................................. 33 ii ICES WGITMO REPORT 2013 4.10.3 Possible MSC certification of a NIS in Spain and its repercussions (by Gemma Quilez-Badia). .......................................... 34 4.10.4 Potential cooperation with ICES Study Group on Integrated Morphological and Molecular Taxonomy (SGIMT) ................................................................................................... 34 4.10.5 Election of chair for 2014-2016.............................................................. 34 5 Closing of the meeting ................................................................................................ 34 Annex 1. List of participants .......................................................................................... 35 Annex 2. Meeting agenda ............................................................................................... 37 Annex 3. National reports .............................................................................................. 41 3.1 Belgium .......................................................................................................................... 41 3.2 Canada ............................................................................................................................ 43 3.3 Croatia ........................................................................................................................... 59 3.4 Denmark ........................................................................................................................ 60 3.5 Estonia ............................................................................................................................ 65 3.6 Finland ............................................................................................................................ 72 3.7 France ............................................................................................................................. 77 3.8 Germany ......................................................................................................................... 86 3.9 Greece ............................................................................................................................. 89 3.10 Italy ............................................................................................................................... 94 3.11 Lithuania...................................................................................................................... 94 3.12 Norway ....................................................................................................................... 107 3.13 Poland ........................................................................................................................ 109 3.14 Portugal ..................................................................................................................... 111 3.15 Spain ........................................................................................................................... 116 3.16 Sweden ....................................................................................................................... 121 3.17 United Kingdom ..................................................................................................... 124 3.18 United States ........................................................................................................... 132 Annex 4. List of new species and range expansions of alien species as reported in National Reports ........................................................................ 139 Annex 5 Proposed Terms of Reference for 2014 .................................................. 146 ICES WGITMO REPORT 2013 1 Executive summary The 2013 meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Ma- rine Organisms (WGITMO) was held in Montreal, Canada during 20-22. March with Cynthia McKenzie as host and Henn Ojaveer as chair. The meeting was attended by 21 participants from 16 countries. The physical participants were from Belgium, Can- ada, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • As Alien Species Hotspot: First Data About Rhithropanopeus Harrisii (Crustacea, Panopeidae) J
    Transitional Waters Bulletin TWB, Transit. Waters Bull. 9 (2015), n.1, 1-10 ISSN 1825-229X, DOI 10.1285/i1825229Xv9n1p1 http://siba-ese.unisalento.it The low basin of the Arno River (Tuscany, Italy) as alien species hotspot: first data about Rhithropanopeus harrisii (Crustacea, Panopeidae) J. Langeneck 1*, M. Barbieri 1, F. Maltagliati 1, A. Castelli 1 1Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Pisa, via Derna 1 - 56126 Pisa, Italy RESEARCH ARTICLE *Corresponding author: Phone: +39 050 2211447; Fax: +39 050 2211410; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract 1 - Harbours and ports, especially if located in the nearby of brackish-water environments, can provide a significant chance to biological invasions. To date, in the Livorno port, twenty alien species have been recorded, fifteen of which are established. 2 - Presence, abundance, size and sex ratio of the mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii, a newly introduced invasive species, have been assessed in six sampling stations along the brackish-water canals between Pisa and Livorno towns. Samplings were carried out in summer and fall 2013. 3 - R. harrisii appeared fully established in the majority of the sampling stations. Reproduction occurs between May and July and sex ratio varied between reproductive and post-reproductive period, with females more abundant before the reproduction. 4 - Individuals of R. harrisii were more abundant in stations close to Livorno port, whereas they were scarce or sporadic in the northernmost stations, close to the main flow of the Arno River. 5 - Due to the high invasive potential of R. harrisii, a closer monitoring of brackish-water environments along the north-western Italian coast is needed, in order to assess and prevent further invasions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Shorefishes of the Canary Islands
    AMERICAN MUSEUM Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 2824, pp. 1-49, figs. 1-5 August 7, 1985 An Annotated Checklist of the Shorefishes of the Canary Islands JAMES K. DOOLEY,' JAMES VAN TASSELL,2 AND ALBERTO BRITO3 ABSTRACT The inshore canarian fish fauna includes 217 The fish fauna contains elements from the Med- species from 67 families. Fifteen new records (in- iterranean-Atlantic and West African areas, but cluding two undescribed species) and numerous does not exhibit any clear transition. Three en- rare species have been included. The number of demic species of fishes have been confirmed. The fishes documented from the Canary Islands and families with the greatest diversification include: nearby waters total approximately 400 species. Sparidae (21 species), Scorpaenidae (1 1), Gobiidae This figure includes some 200 pelagic, deepwater, (1 1), Blenniidae (10), Serranidae (9), Carangidae and elasmobranch species not treated in this study. (9), Muraenidae (7), and Labridae (7). RESUMEN La fauna ictiologica de las aguas costeras se las en el presente trabajo. La fauna contiene elemen- Islas Canarias comprende 217 especies de 67 fa- tos de las regiones Atlantico-Mediterranea y Oeste milias. Se incluyen quince citas nuevas (incluyen Africana, pero no muestra una clara transicion. dos especies no describen) y numerosas especies Tres especie endemica existe. Las familias con ma- raras. El nu'mero de peces de las aguas canarias se yor diversificacion son: Sparidae (21 especies), eleva aproximadamente a 400 especies. Este nui- Scorpaenidae (1 1), Gobiidae (1 1), Blenniidae (10), mero incluye casi 200 especies pelagicas, de aguas Serranidae (9), Carangidae (9), Muraenidae (7), y profundas y elasmobranquios que no se discuten Labridae (7).
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Invertebrate Field Guide
    Marine Invertebrate Field Guide Contents ANEMONES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 AGGREGATING ANEMONE (ANTHOPLEURA ELEGANTISSIMA) ............................................................................................................................... 2 BROODING ANEMONE (EPIACTIS PROLIFERA) ................................................................................................................................................... 2 CHRISTMAS ANEMONE (URTICINA CRASSICORNIS) ............................................................................................................................................ 3 PLUMOSE ANEMONE (METRIDIUM SENILE) ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 BARNACLES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ACORN BARNACLE (BALANUS GLANDULA) ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 HAYSTACK BARNACLE (SEMIBALANUS CARIOSUS) .............................................................................................................................................. 4 CHITONS ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Boating As a Major Vector of Spread of Nonindigenous Species Around the Mediterranean Aylin Ulman
    Recreational boating as a major vector of spread of nonindigenous species around the Mediterranean Aylin Ulman To cite this version: Aylin Ulman. Recreational boating as a major vector of spread of nonindigenous species around the Mediterranean. Ecosystems. Sorbonne Université, 2018. English. NNT : 2018SORUS222. tel- 02483397 HAL Id: tel-02483397 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02483397 Submitted on 18 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Sorbonne Université Università di Pavia Ecole doctorale CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environments Benthiques, LECOB, F-66650 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France Recreational boating as a major vector of spread of non- indigenous species around the Mediterranean La navigation de plaisance, vecteur majeur de la propagation d’espèces non-indigènes autour des marinas Méditerranéenne Par Aylin Ulman Thèse de doctorat de Philosophie Dirigée par Agnese Marchini et Jean-Marc Guarini Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 6 Avril, 2018 Devant un jury composé de : Anna Occhipinti (President, University
    [Show full text]
  • Material and Methods
    Délivré par UNIVERSITE DE PERPIGNAN VIA DOMITIA Préparée au sein de l’école doctorale Energie et Environnement Et de l’unité de recherche CEntre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens (CEFREM) UMR 5110 CNRS UPVD Spécialité : Océanologie Présentée par Myriam LTEIF BIOLOGY, DISTRIBUTION AND DIVERSITY OF CARTILAGINOUS FISH SPECIES ALONG THE LEBANESE COAST, EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN Soutenue le 22 Septembre 2015 devant le jury composé de Eric CLUA, HDR, Délégué Régional à la Recherche et à la Rapporteur Technologie (DRRT), Polynésie Française Ghassan EL ZEIN, Professeur, Université Libanaise Rapporteur Bernard SERET, Chercheur, IRD Museum d'Histoire Naturelle Examinateur Philippe LENFANT, Professeur, HDR, UPVD Examinateur Gaby KHALAF, Professeur, CNRS Libanais Directeur Marion VERDOIT-JARRAYA, Maître de conférences, UPVD Co-directrice To my parents, Imane and Issam To my sister, Stephanie To the love of my life, Salim You all mean the world to me… In loving memory of Hanna Kattoura Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. Robert Frost Acknowledgements I would like to offer my deepest gratitude to Dr. Eric Clua and Professor Ghassan El Zein who judged this work, Dr. Bernard Seret, Dr. Philippe Lenfant for their presence in the jury. They all gave me the honor and pleasure of being present during my thesis defense and their remarks were very beneficial to me. I am indebted to Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD), especially the directors of the Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens (CEFREM), Serge Heussner and Wolfgang Ludwig for welcoming me during my thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • 'False Cod' Epinephelus Aeneus in a Context of Ineffective Management
    African Journal of Marine Science 2012, 34(3): 305–311 Copyright © NISC (Pty) Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE ISSN 1814-232X EISSN 1814-2338 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2989/1814232X.2012.725278 Economic dimension of the collapse of the ‘false cod’ Epinephelus aeneus in a context of ineffective management of the small-scale fisheries in Senegal D Thiao 1*, C Chaboud 2, A Samba 3, F Laloë 4 and PM Cury 2 1 Centre de Recherches Océanographiques de Dakar-Thiaroye (CRODT), BP 2241, Dakar, Senegal 2 IRD, UMR EME 212 (Exploited Marine Ecosystems), Centre de Recherche Halieutique Méditerranéenne et Tropicale IRD – IFREMER and Université Montpellier II, Avenue Jean Monnet, BP 171, 34203 Sète Cedex, France 3 Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Cité ISRA n°103, BP 03, Dakar RP, Senegal 4 IRD, UMR GRED 220 (Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement Développement), IRD – UPV Montpellier III, 911 avenue Agropolis, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Small-scale fisheries are often seen as a solution for ensuring sustainability in marine exploitation. They are viewed as a suitable alternative to industrial fisheries, particularly when considering their social and economic importance in developing countries. Here, we show that the booming small-scale fishery sector in Senegal, in the context of increasing foreign demand, has induced the collapse of one of the most emblematic West African marine fish species, a large grouper Epinephelus aeneus , historically called ‘false cod’ by European fishers. The overexploitation of this species appears to be on account of the increasing effort sustained by a growing international demand and important subsidies, which resulted in a relative stability of the average economic yield per fishing trip and an incentive for continuing targeting this species to almost extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrival of Round Goby Neogobius Melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) and Bighead Goby Ponticola Kessleri (Günther, 1861) in the High Rhine (Switzerland)
    BioInvasions Records (2013) Volume 2, Issue 1: 79–83 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2013.2.1.14 © 2013 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2013 REABIC Short Communication Arrival of round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) and bighead goby Ponticola kessleri (Günther, 1861) in the High Rhine (Switzerland) Irene Kalchhauser*, Peter Mutzner, Philipp E. Hirsch and Patricia Burkhardt-Holm Program Man-Society-Environment, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] (IK), [email protected] (PM), [email protected] (PEH), [email protected] (PBH) *Corresponding author Received: 20 July 2012 / Accepted: 31 October 2012 / Published online: 22 November 2012 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract A number of Ponto-Caspian gobiid species are currently invading European coasts and freshwaters. They do not only present a nuisance to fishermen, but evidence suggests that they compete with native benthic fishes and may contribute to changes in ecosystem function. This paper reports the presence of round goby Neogobius melanostomus individuals and an established population of bighead goby Ponticola kessleri in the High Rhine. Key words: gobiidae; non-native; alien; invasion; High Rhine; Switzerland 2001) was predicted to promote westward Introduction migration of fish species (Balon et al. 1986), including Ponto-Caspian gobiids (Proterorhinus Several goby species from the Caspian and Black marmoratus). In the meantime, five of six gobiid Sea are currently spreading in European rivers. species predicted to invade the Rhine (Freyhof Ponticola kessleri (Günther, 1861; Neilson and 2003) have indeed arrived. Their dispersal Stepien 2009), Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, appears to be facilitated by shipping, as round 1814), Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814), goby dispersal has followed shipping routes Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814), and Babka (Brown and Stepien 2009; LaRue et al.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reports (Term of Reference A) Presented at the 46Th Meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers Of
    National Reports (Term of Reference a) Presented at the 46th meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms, held in Gdynia, Poland from 4 to 6 March 2020. Arranged Alphabetically by Country Compiled by Cynthia H McKenzie, Chair, WGITMO CANADA …………………………………………………………………… …. 2 DENMARK ………………………………………………………………………. 10 FINLAND ………………………………………………………………………. 18 FRANCE ………………………………………………………………………. 21 GERMANY ………………………………………………………………………. 33 GREECE ………………………………………………………………………. 46 ICELAND ………………………………………………………………………. 54 ITALY ………………………………………………………………………. 58 LITHUANIA ………………………………………………………………………. 73 NETHERLANDS …………………………………………………………………. 75 NORWAY ………………………………………………………………………. 77 POLAND ………………………………………………………………………. 86 PORTUGAL ………………………………………………………………………. 89 SWEDEN ………………………………………………………………………. 99 UNITED KINGDOM ……………………………………………………………. 104 UNITED STATES …………………………………………………………………. 119 1 CANADA National Report for Canada 2019 Report Prepared By: Cynthia McKenzie, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador Region: [email protected]; Contributions By: Nathalie Simard, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Quebec Region: [email protected]; Kimberly Howland, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Central and Arctic Region: [email protected]; Renée Bernier and Chantal Coomber, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Gulf Region: renee.bernier@dfo- mpo.gc.ca, [email protected]; Angelica Silva, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maritimes Region: [email protected] Overview: NEW or SPREAD
    [Show full text]
  • Zernov's Phyllophora Field) at the Beginning of the 21St Century
    Ecologica Montenegrina 39: 92-108 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.39.11 Structure of the macrozoobenthos assemblages in the central part of the northwestern Black Sea shelf (Zernov's Phyllophora field) at the beginning of the 21st century NIKOLAI K. REVKOV1* & NATALIA A. BOLTACHOVA1 1 A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS; 2, Nakhimov ave., Sevastopol 299011, Russia *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received 24 December 2020 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 11 February 2021 │ Published online 16 February 2021. Abstract In the first half of the 20th century, there was an extensive biocoenosis of the unattached red algae Phyllophora crispa on the mussel muds of the central section of the Black Sea’s northwestern shelf, which is known as Zernov’s Phyllophora Field (ZPF). At that time, the area of ZPF was approximately 11000 km2. More than a century after the description of ZPF, long-term changes in its phyto- and zoobenthos have been noted. A period of ecological crisis of the Black Sea ecosystem during the second half of the 20th century was destructive for the phytobenthos of ZPF, with the complete degradation of unattached Phyllophora biocoenosis. In contrast, after a sharp decline in the quantitative development of macrozoobenthos of the soft bottoms in the 1970s, its recovery to pre-crisis levels in the 2010s was noted. Despite the difference in the aforementioned phyto- and zoobenthos dynamics, habitat in the 4025 km² area of the botanical sanctuary of national importance “Zernov’s Phyllophora Field” was recognised as Critically Endangered (CR) within the European Red List of Habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • BIO 313 ANIMAL ECOLOGY Corrected
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COURSE CODE: BIO 314 COURSE TITLE: ANIMAL ECOLOGY 1 BIO 314: ANIMAL ECOLOGY Team Writers: Dr O.A. Olajuyigbe Department of Biology Adeyemi Colledge of Education, P.M.B. 520, Ondo, Ondo State Nigeria. Miss F.C. Olakolu Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, No 3 Wilmot Point Road, Bar-beach Bus-stop, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria. Mrs H.O. Omogoriola Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, No 3 Wilmot Point Road, Bar-beach Bus-stop, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria. EDITOR: Mrs Ajetomobi School of Agricultural Sciences Lagos State Polytechnic Ikorodu, Lagos 2 BIO 313 COURSE GUIDE Introduction Animal Ecology (313) is a first semester course. It is a two credit unit elective course which all students offering Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Biology can take. Animal ecology is an important area of study for scientists. It is the study of animals and how they related to each other as well as their environment. It can also be defined as the scientific study of interactions that determine the distribution and abundance of organisms. Since this is a course in animal ecology, we will focus on animals, which we will define fairly generally as organisms that can move around during some stages of their life and that must feed on other organisms or their products. There are various forms of animal ecology. This includes: • Behavioral ecology, the study of the behavior of the animals with relation to their environment and others • Population ecology, the study of the effects on the population of these animals • Marine ecology is the scientific study of marine-life habitat, populations, and interactions among organisms and the surrounding environment including their abiotic (non-living physical and chemical factors that affect the ability of organisms to survive and reproduce) and biotic factors (living things or the materials that directly or indirectly affect an organism in its environment).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Environment on Arctica Islandica Shell Formation and Architecture
    Biogeosciences, 14, 1577–1591, 2017 www.biogeosciences.net/14/1577/2017/ doi:10.5194/bg-14-1577-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The effects of environment on Arctica islandica shell formation and architecture Stefania Milano1, Gernot Nehrke2, Alan D. Wanamaker Jr.3, Irene Ballesta-Artero4,5, Thomas Brey2, and Bernd R. Schöne1 1Institute of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Joh.-J.-Becherweg 21, 55128 Mainz, Germany 2Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 3Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA 4Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, the Netherlands 5Department of Animal Ecology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Correspondence to: Stefania Milano ([email protected]) Received: 27 October 2016 – Discussion started: 7 December 2016 Revised: 1 March 2017 – Accepted: 4 March 2017 – Published: 27 March 2017 Abstract. Mollusks record valuable information in their hard tribution, and (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was parts that reflect ambient environmental conditions. For this used to detect changes in microstructural organization. Our reason, shells can serve as excellent archives to reconstruct results indicate that A. islandica microstructure is not sen- past climate and environmental variability. However, animal sitive to changes in the food source and, likely, shell pig- physiology and biomineralization, which are often poorly un- ment are not altered by diet. However, seawater temperature derstood, can make the decoding of environmental signals had a statistically significant effect on the orientation of the a challenging task.
    [Show full text]