DOCSLIB.ORG

Projects, Publications, Meetings & Donors to the Academy 2016–2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Projects, Publications, Meetings & Donors to the Academy 2016–2017 Projects, Publications, Meetings & Donors to the Academy 2016–2017 With Appreciation . Academy projects, publications, and meetings are supported by gifts and grants from Members, friends, foundations, corporations, Affiliates, and other funding agencies. The Academy expresses its deep appreciation for this support and to the many Members who contribute to its work. Published by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, September 2016 Contents From the President 3 Projects, Publications & Meetings Science, Engineering, and Technology Overview 4 New Models for U.S. Science & Technology Policy 4 The Public Face of Science 7 Human Performance Enhancement 11 The Alternative Energy Future 13 Global Security and International Affairs Overview 16 New Dilemmas in Ethics, Technology, and War 17 The Global Nuclear Future 21 Civil Wars, Violence, and International Responses 27 Understanding the New Nuclear Age 30 The Humanities, Arts, and Education Overview 33 Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education 33 Commission on Language Learning 38 The Lincoln Project: Excellence and Access in Public Higher Education 41 Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences 47 The Humanities Indicators 48 Exploratory Initiatives 51 Regional Program Committees 56 Discussion Groups 59 Meetings and Events 61 Affiliates of the American Academy 72 Donors to the Academy 75 From the President dvancing knowledge and learning in service to the nation has been the mission A of the Academy since its founding in 1780. Through the study of social and scien- tific problems and opportunities, the Academy provides critical thinking on the most pressing challenges facing the country and the world. As you will see in the pages that follow, the Academy is exploring issues from the future of undergraduate education, to the nation’s language education needs, to the governance of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty regime, to the new ethical dilemmas created by contemporary political developments and changes in military technology, to the complex and evolving relationship between scientists and the public, to the importance of federally supported basic research that is critical for driving innovation and ensuring economic opportunities. These studies draw on the intellectual resources of hundreds of our members and involve many collaborating organizations–both national and international. Our work engages members and other experts from diverse professions and disciplines and brings them together to address critical issues facing our global society. We are grateful to the many members who contribute to and participate in the Acade- my’s projects, publications, and programs. This support gives the Academy the inde- pendence to pursue important issues that advance the common good. None of this work would be possible without the efforts of a talented and dedicated staff. As always, I welcome your questions about the Academy and suggestions for its future. Science,Science, Engineering, Engineering, and Technology and Technology 4 cademy projects in Science, Engineering, and Technology advance critical thinking about A the evolving landscape for scientific research. Drawing on the expertise of leading scientists, policy-makers, social scientists, humanists, and technical experts from both academia and indus- try, the studies explore how science and technology are changing, how to help the public under- stand those changes, and how society can better adapt to those changes. Areas of interest include the nation’s productivity in science and technology; the social and regulatory factors that influ- ence the adoption of new technologies; and public understanding of, and trust in, science. New Models for U.S. Science & Technology Policy PROJECTS, PUBLICATIONS & MEETINGS PROJECTS, PUBLICATIONS In September 2014, the New Models for U.S. Science Several initiatives have emerged in response to Restoring and Technology Policy commission issued its report, the Foundation. In June 2015, the Academy joined with a Restoring the Foundation: The Vital Role of Research in Pre- coalition of organizations in issuing “Innovation: An serving the American Dream. The report underscored the American Imperative,” a statement in support of several importance of federally supported research, particularly of the report’s key recommendations. The leaders of basic research, that is critical for driving innovation nine large U.S. corporations signed the call to action, and ensuring economic opportunities. The report also which urged Congress to enact policies and make invest- called for long-term planning and sustainability for the ments to ensure that the United States remains the nation’s research enterprise. global innovation leader. Over five hundred organiza- tions from all fifty states have endorsed the call to action. In today’s fast-paced, high-tech, knowledge-based economy, staying globally competitive requires inno- In October 2015, members of the Innovation Imperative vation and rapid integration of new knowledge and coalition held a public symposium on Capitol Hill, at technologies that emerge from investments in research which industry leaders discussed federal policies and and development. The Restoring the Foundation report and investments that would promote innovation, stimu- subsequent follow-up efforts urged a greater focus on the late economic growth and prosperity, and ensure the long-term sustainability of the U.S. research enterprise country’s health and national security. In January 2016, a and offered recommendations in three areas that will bipartisan group of members from both houses of Con- be critical for securing America’s leadership in science, gress sent a letter to their colleagues that underscored engineering, and technology in the twenty-first century: the importance of several policy prescriptions set forth in the Restoring the Foundation report and reaffirmed by • Secure America’s Leadership in Science and Engineering the Innovation Imperative call to action. Research–Especially Basic Research–by Providing Sustain- able Federal Investments. America is falling behind in Most recently, Jeannette M. Wing, Corporate Vice innovation by failing to make sustainable long-term President at Microsoft Research, delivered testimony investments needed to remain the global leader in on Restoring the Foundation before the Senate Committee industry and commerce. on Commerce, Science, and Transportation to further • Ensure that the American People Receive the Maximum elevate the profile of the report’s recommendations for Benefit from Federal Investments in Research. Many current enhancing the U.S. research enterprise. The Commerce policies and practices in government, industry, and Committee subsequently approved legislation that universities have become overly burdensome and addresses several of the report’s recommendations, diminish the productivity of the research system. including affirming the value of peer review and reduc- ing administrative burdens on researchers. • Regain America’s Standing as an Innovation Leader by Establishing a More Robust National Government- The Academy continues to work with other organi- University-Industry Research Partnership. The United zations to raise the profile of science and engineering States is in need of a new kind of research partnership research. that includes government (federal and state), uni- versities (public and private), and industry, as well as philanthropy and private foundations, in which each sector supports the nation’s science and technology research enterprise. 5 New Models for U.S. Science & Technology Policy Project Chairs BART GORDON SUBRA SURESH K&L Gates; formerly, U.S. House of Carnegie Mellon University NORMAN R. AUGUSTINE Representatives Lockheed Martin Corporation, ret. SHIRLEY M. TILGHMAN M.R.C. GREENWOOD Princeton University NEAL LANE University of Hawaii System, ret. Rice University JEANNETTE M. WING JOHN L. HENNESSY Microsoft Research Project Members Stanford University ELIAS ZERHOUNI NANCY C. ANDREWS CHARLES O. HOLLIDAY, JR. Sanofi Duke University School of Medicine Shell; formerly, Bank of America; formerly, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Project Advisors & MEETINGS PROJECTS, PUBLICATIONS JOHN E. BRYSON Company formerly, U.S. Department of Commerce; JOHN C. CROWLEY formerly, Edison International PETER S. KIM Charlottesville, VA Stanford University; formerly, Merck KIRSTIN MATTHEWS THOMAS R. CECH Research Laboratories University of Colorado Boulder; formerly, Rice University Howard Hughes Medical Institute DANA MEAD MIT Corporation Project Staff STEVEN CHU Stanford University; formerly, RICHARD A. MESERVE JOHN RANDELL U.S. Department of Energy Covington & Burling LLP; formerly, SHALIN JYOTISHI Carnegie Institution for Science JARED COHON ALISON LEAF Carnegie Mellon University C. D. MOTE, JR. KEERTHI SHETTY National Academy of Engineering; JAMES J. DUDERSTADT University of Maryland Funders University of Michigan VENKATESH NARAYANAMURTI Louise Henry Bryson and John E. Bryson MARK C. FISHMAN Harvard University Novartis Institutes for BioMedical John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Research MAXINE L. SAVITZ Foundation Honeywell Inc., ret. SYLVESTER JAMES GATES, JR. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation University of Maryland ROBERT F. SPROULL Simons Foundation University of Massachusetts, Amherst; formerly, Oracle Corporation Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Publication Restoring the Foundation: The Vital Role of Research in Pre- serving the American Dream (American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2014) Science,Science,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Total Economic Costs of the War Beyond the Federal Budget
    S. HRG. 110–703 WAR AT ANY COST? THE TOTAL ECONOMIC COSTS OF THE WAR BEYOND THE FEDERAL BUDGET HEARING BEFORE THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 28, 2008 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 42–773 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:44 Jan 30, 2009 Jkt 042773 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\42773.TXT DianeA PsN: DianeA JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE [Created pursuant to Sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304, 79th Congress] SENATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York, Chairman CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York, Vice Chair EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico BARON P. HILL, Indiana AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota LORETTA SANCHEZ, California ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania ELIJAH CUMMINGS, Maryland JIM WEBB, Virginia LLOYD DOGGETT, Texas SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JIM SAXTON, New Jersey, Ranking Minority JOHN SUNUNU, New Hampshire KEVIN BRADY, Texas JIM DEMINT, South Carolina PHIL ENGLISH, Pennsylvania ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah RON PAUL, Texas MICHAEL LASKAWY, Executive Director CHRISTOPHER J. FRENZE, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:44 Jan 30, 2009 Jkt 042773 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\42773.TXT DianeA PsN: DianeA C O N T E N T S MEMBERS Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Issue As A
    MICHAEL GERRARD ‘72 COLLEGE HONORS FIVE IS THE GURU OF DISTINGUISHED ALUMNI CLIMATE CHANGE LAW WITH JOHN JAY AWARDS Page 26 Page 18 Columbia College May/June 2011 TODAY Nobel Prize-winner Martin Chalfie works with College students in his laboratory. APassion for Science Members of the College’s science community discuss their groundbreaking research ’ll meet you for a I drink at the club...” Meet. Dine. Play. Take a seat at the newly renovated bar grill or fine dining room. See how membership in the Columbia Club could fit into your life. For more information or to apply, visit www.columbiaclub.org or call (212) 719-0380. The Columbia University Club of New York 15 West 43 St. New York, N Y 10036 Columbia’s SocialIntellectualCulturalRecreationalProfessional Resource in Midtown. Columbia College Today Contents 26 20 30 18 73 16 COVER STORY ALUMNI NEWS DEPARTMENTS 2 20 A PA SSION FOR SCIENCE 38 B OOKSHELF LETTERS TO THE Members of the College’s scientific community share Featured: N.C. Christopher EDITOR Couch ’76 takes a serious look their groundbreaking work; also, a look at “Frontiers at The Joker and his creator in 3 WITHIN THE FA MILY of Science,” the Core’s newest component. Jerry Robinson: Ambassador of By Ethan Rouen ’04J, ’11 Business Comics. 4 AROUND THE QU A DS 4 Reunion, Dean’s FEATURES 40 O BITU A RIES Day 2011 6 Class Day, 43 C L A SS NOTES JOHN JA Y AW A RDS DINNER FETES FIVE Commencement 2011 18 The College honored five alumni for their distinguished A LUMNI PROFILES 8 Senate Votes on ROTC professional achievements at a gala dinner in March.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridget Terry Long, Ph.D
    Bridget Terry Long, Ph.D. Harvard Graduate School of Education 101 Longfellow Hall, 13 Appian Way, Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] hhtp://gseacademic.harvard.edu/~longbr/ ACADEMIC POSITIONS Academic Dean, Harvard Graduate School of Education (2013 to present) Saris Professor of Education and Economics (endowed faculty chair; formerly called the Xander Chair; 2011 to present); Professor of Education and Economics, Harvard University, Graduate School of Education (2009 to present) Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) (2009 to present). Faculty Research Fellow (2003‐09) Research Affiliate, Center for Analysis on Postsecondary Education and Employment (CAPSEE) (2011 to present) Research Affiliate, National Center of Postsecondary Research (NCPR) (2006‐12) Associate Professor of Education and Economics, Harvard University, Graduate School of Education (2004‐ 09) Visiting Scholar, Boston Federal Reserve Bank, New England Public Policy Center (2006‐07) Assistant Professor, Harvard University, Graduate School of Education (2000‐04) EDUCATION Ph.D. Harvard University, Economics (2000). Dissertation: The Market for Higher Education: Economic Analyses of College Choice, Returns, and State Aid Policy. Committee members: Caroline Hoxby (chair); Lawrence Katz; Claudia Goldin. M.A. Harvard University, Economics (1997) Fields: Labor Economics, Public Finance, Urban Economics. A.B. Princeton University, Economics (1995) Certificate in Afro‐American Studies. Courses Stanford University (Summer 1993) American Economic Association (AEA) Graduate School Preparation Program. BOARDS AND LEADERSHIP Member, National Board of Education Sciences (NBES), Institute of Education Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education. Presidential Appointment with Senate confirmation. Vice Chair (2010‐11). Chair (2011‐13). Member (2010 to present). Member, Board of Directors, MDRC (2010 to present).
    [Show full text]
  • Diana Natalicio Flyer And
    WITH EXCLUSIVE EVENT SPONSOR PRESENT OUR 20TH ANNIVERSARY DINNER & FUNDRAISER WITH DR. DIANA NATALICIO FORTUNE MAGAZINE’S TOP 50 WORLD LEADERS Tuesday, October 1, 2019 @ 5:15 PM Judson F. Williams Convention Center DR. DIANA NATALICIO K E Y N O T E S P E A K E R Diana Natalicio was named president of The University of Texas at El Paso in 1988. During her long and distinguished career with the University, she has served as vice president for academic affairs, dean of liberal arts, and chair of the modern languages department. During her tenure as president, UTEP’s enrollment has grown from 15,000 to over 25,000 students, its annual budget has increased from $65 million to more than $500 million. UTEP is designated as a Carnegie R1 university, recognized nationally for both the excellence and breadth of its academic and research programs. UTEP’s annual research expenditures have grown from $6 to nearly $95 million, and doctoral programs from one to twenty-two. Dr. Natalicio has served on numerous boards including the Hispanic Scholarship Fund (HSF), Rockefeller Foundation, Trinity Industries, Sandia Corporation, U.S.-Mexico Foundation for Science (FUMEC), American Council on Education, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering (NACME), Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU), and Internet 2. In 2017, Dr. Natalicio was named one of Fortune magazine’s Top 50 World Leaders. She was honored with the Hispanic Heritage Award in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math, and she was included on the 2016 TIME 100 list of most influential people in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen S. Wise and Golda Meir: Zionism, Israel, and American Power in the Twentieth Century
    Stephen S. Wise and Golda Meir: Zionism, Israel, and American Power in the Twentieth Century Mark A. Raider* In his seminal study, The Idea of the Jewish State (1969), the historian Ben Halpern observes: “Israel, the Jewish state, is, of course, the child of Zionism.”1 Situating Zionism in the context of other modern nationalist struggles, Halpern argues that Jewish nationalism, notwithstanding its particular and even pecu- liar characteristics, is something of a cousin to other ethnic forms of national expression that arose in the mid- to late nineteenth century. The campaign for Jewish statehood, he further explains, was not only dependent on a variety of objective conditions and factors, but also on the capacity of emerging lead- ers to navigate a generally precarious and hostile global arena. The latter fun- damental political reality, Jehuda Reinharz argues, has, since Theodor Herzl, prompted Zionism’s strategy of forging a necessary link to a great power. It has also shaped the “historical dimensions” of the Zionist movement, the Yishuv (the pre-state Jewish community in Palestine), and contemporary Israeli soci- ety, while imbuing relations with the “great powers” with “a quasi-ideological significance.”2 Though Britain played a dominant role in Zionist policy mak- ing by the eve of World War i, and thereafter controlled Palestine until 1947, in this period the United States assumed an increasingly significant role in determining Zionism’s trajectory. In due course, as David Biale observes, the Zionist cause “transformed the nature of American Jewish politics,” and after the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948, “precisely because Israel [was] forced to become a major military power, American Jews [became] a direct party to superpower geopolitics” in the Middle East.3 Building on the foregoing important and useful observations, the present study reconsiders the cases of two towering historical figures who straddled the pre- and post-state periods: Stephen S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009–2010 Columbia University Columbia 2009–2010 Report Annual Nstitute
    WEATHERHEAD ANNUAL REPORT 2009 – 2 010 E AST A SIAN I NSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT 2009–2010 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Weatherhead East Asian Institute Columbia University International Affairs Building, 9th floor MC 3333 420 West 118th Street New York, NY 10027 Tel: 212-854-2592 Fax: 212-749-1497 www.columbia.edu/weai TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR 1 2 THE WEATHERHEAD EAST ASIAN INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2 3 THE RESEARCH COMMUNITY 3 4 PUBLICATIONS 26 5 RESEARCH CENTERS AT THE WEATHERHEAD EAST ASIAN INSTITUTE AND AFFILIATED COLUMBIA PROGRAMS 30 6 PUBLIC PROGRAMMING 34 7 GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES 39 8 STUDENTS 43 9 ASIA FOR EDUCATORS PROGRAM 47 10 AdMINISTRATIVE STAFF OF THE WEATHERHEAD EAST ASIAN INSTITUTE 50 11 FUNDING SOURCES 51 12 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MAP: MORNINGSIDE CAMPUS & ENVIRONS 52 1 LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR Over the past year, the Weatherhead East Asian Institute’s leading position in regional studies was amply reaffirmed. A fitting finale to our 60th anniversary celebrations was the June 13, 2010, symposium in Taipei, “Taiwan in the Twenty-first Century: Politics, Economy and Society.” This symposium continued WEAI’s outreach programs in East Asia to local Columbia alumni and to all prior visiting scholars, professional fellows, or participants at WEAI. The first three symposia were held in Beijing, Tokyo, and Seoul during May and June of 2009, and planning is now under way for a May 2011 sym- posium to take place in Hong Kong. As with the earlier events, the Taipei symposium involved close cooperation with the Columbia Alumni Association. The local signifi- cance of the symposium was underscored by the keynote speaker, Vincent Siew, vice president of the Republic of China (Taiwan), and by the meeting on the following day of symposium panelists and speakers with ROC President Ma Ying-jeou.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism 2.0”—The Spreading of Jew-Hatredonthe World Wide Web
    MonikaSchwarz-Friesel “Antisemitism 2.0”—The Spreading of Jew-hatredonthe World Wide Web This article focuses on the rising problem of internet antisemitism and online ha- tred against Israel. Antisemitism 2.0isfound on all webplatforms, not justin right-wing social media but alsoonthe online commentary sections of quality media and on everydayweb pages. The internet shows Jew‐hatred in all its var- ious contemporary forms, from overt death threats to more subtle manifestations articulated as indirect speech acts. The spreading of antisemitic texts and pic- tures on all accessibleaswell as seemingly non-radical platforms, their rapid and multiple distribution on the World Wide Web, adiscourse domain less con- trolled than other media, is by now acommon phenomenon within the spaceof public online communication. As aresult,the increasingimportance of Web2.0 communication makes antisemitism generallymore acceptable in mainstream discourse and leadstoanormalization of anti-Jewishutterances. Empirical results from alongitudinalcorpus studyare presented and dis- cussed in this article. They show how centuries old anti-Jewish stereotypes are persistentlyreproducedacross different social strata. The data confirm that hate speech against Jews on online platforms follows the pattern of classical an- tisemitism. Although manyofthem are camouflaged as “criticism of Israel,” they are rooted in the ancient and medieval stereotypes and mental models of Jew hostility.Thus, the “Israelization of antisemitism,”¹ the most dominant manifes- tation of Judeophobia today, proves to be merelyanew garb for the age-old Jew hatred. However,the easy accessibility and the omnipresenceofantisemitism on the web 2.0enhancesand intensifies the spreadingofJew-hatred, and its prop- agation on social media leads to anormalization of antisemitic communication, thinking,and feeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle
    1JULY 2017 M A R V E L E T A L . 4983 Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle KATE MARVEL Columbia University, and NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York MICHELA BIASUTTI Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York CÉLINE BONFILS AND KARL E. TAYLOR Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California YOCHANAN KUSHNIR Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York BENJAMIN I. COOK NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York (Manuscript received 2 August 2016, in final form 8 February 2017) ABSTRACT Anthropogenic climate change is predicted to cause spatial and temporal shifts in precipitation patterns. These may be apparent in changes to the annual cycle of zonal mean precipitation P. Trends in the amplitude and phase of the P annual cycle in two long-term, global satellite datasets are broadly similar. Model-derived fingerprints of externally forced changes to the amplitude and phase of the P seasonal cycle, combined with these observations, enable a formal detection and attribution analysis. Observed amplitude changes are in- consistent with model estimates of internal variability but not attributable to the model-predicted response to external forcing. This mismatch between observed and predicted amplitude changes is consistent with the sustained La Niña–like conditions that characterize the recent slowdown in the rise of the global mean temperature. However, observed changes to the annual cycle phase do not seem to be driven by this recent hiatus. These changes are consistent with model estimates of forced changes, are inconsistent (in one ob- servational dataset) with estimates of internal variability, and may suggest the emergence of an externally forced signal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Undergraduate Education the Future of America
    FOR COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY LEADERS THE FUTURE OF UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION THE FUTURE OF AMERICA Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education OVERVIEW AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY LEADER PRIORITIES As one of the nation’s oldest independent policy research The report recognizes the need for willing partners from centers and learned societies, the American Academy of Arts colleges and universities, from federal and state govern- and Sciences convenes leaders to address critical challenges ments, from business and industry, and from philanthropy facing our global society and provides authoritative and and other entities to help achieve these goals. The recom- nonpartisan policy advice to decision-makers in govern- mendations that follow are directed toward college and ment, academia, and the private sector. Since its founding university leaders. The full report and a report brief are in 1780, the Academy has served the nation as a champion available at www.amacad.org/cfue. of scholarship, civil dialogue, and useful knowledge. The greatest benefits of an undergraduate education for COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE students and the country derive from earning a creden- OF UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION tial and not simply from attendance. Students who do not The Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Edu- graduate are often wasting the scarce resources of money cation was created by the Academy to examine the cur- and time. Through investments in providing students with rent state of American undergraduate education, project consistently good teaching and cocurricular experiences, the nation’s short-term and long-term educational colleges and universities can improve student learning, needs, and offer recommendations for strengthening all satisfaction, and completion of quality credentials.
    [Show full text]
  • FYE Int 100120A.Indd
    FirstYear & Common Reading CATALOG NEW & RECOMMENDED BOOKS Dear Common Reading Director: The Common Reads team at Penguin Random House is excited to present our latest book recommendations for your common reading program. In this catalog you will discover new titles such as: Isabel Wilkerson’s Caste, a masterful exploration of how America has been shaped by a hidden caste system, a rigid hierarchy of human rankings; Handprints on Hubble, Kathr­n Sullivan’s account of being the fi rst American woman to walk in space, as part of the team that launched, rescued, repaired, and maintained the Hubble Space Telescope; Know My Name, Chanel Miller’s stor­ of trauma and transcendence which will forever transform the way we think about seual assault; Ishmael Beah’s powerful new novel Little Family about young people living at the margins of society; and Brittany Barnett’s riveting memoir A Knock at Midnight, a coming-of-age stor­ by a young la­er and a powerful evocation of what it takes to bring hope and justice to a legal system built to resist them both. In addition to this catalog, our recently refreshed and updated .commonreads.com website features titles from across Penguin Random House’s publishers as well as great blog content, including links to author videos, and the fourth iteration of our annual “Wat Students Will Be Reading: Campus Common Reading Roundup,” a valuable resource and archive for common reading programs across the countr­. And be sure to check out our online resource for Higher Education: .prheducation.com. Featuring Penguin Random House’s most frequently-adopted titles across more than 1,700 college courses, the site allows professors to easily identif­ books and resources appropriate for a wide range of courses.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Letter from University Presidents (PDF)
    September 13, 2012 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave Washington, D.C. 20500 Sen. Harry Reid Sen. Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader Senate Republican Leader 522 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Hon. John Boehner Hon. Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House Democratic Leader H-232, US Capitol H-204, US Capitol Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. President, Majority Leader Reid, Republican Leader McConnell, Speaker Boehner, and Democratic Leader Pelosi: As leaders of universities educating the creators of tomorrow’s scientific breakthroughs, we call on you to address a critical threat to America’s preeminence as a global center of innovation and prosperity: our inability under current United States immigration policy to retain and benefit from many of the top minds educated at our universities. From the industrial revolution to today’s information age, the United States has led the world in creating the inventions and ideas that drive economic prosperity. America’s universities are responsible for 36 percent of all research in the country, including 53 percent of all basic research, and they help keep America at the forefront of the 21st century economy. The Federal Government has recognized the importance of university research by providing roughly 60 percent of all academic R&D funding. American academic research has benefited from the fact that the US remains a top magnet for the world’s best and brightest students and graduates 16 percent of all PhDs worldwide in scientific and technical fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Y. Yang
    1 (619) 944-9009 · [email protected] JOSHUA Y. YANG www.linkedin.com/in/joshuayoungyang www.joshuayang.com BACKGROUND With a background in life sciences technologies development, unmet clinical needs discovery, and biotechnology and healthcare entrepreneurship, Josh invents and commercializes biomedical technologies that he can translate into clinical practice. He also works to identify promising biotech and healthcare innovations and startups for investment opportunities and was named to the Forbes 30 Under 30 Healthcare list in 2021. Currently, he is pursuing a triple MD/PhD/MBA at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, where he was selected as a Siebel Scholar. His startup Nephrosant has raised over $22M in funding to commercialize a low-cost, non-invasive diagnostic assay for kidney injury. EDUCATION Stanford University Graduate School of Business | Stanford, CA 09/201 9 – Present Master of Business Administration, M.B.A. (Expected 2021) Siebel Scholar Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine | Baltimore, MD 08/2016 – 12/2018 Doctor of Medicine, M.D. (On LOA) Doctor of Philosophy in Bioengineering, Ph.D. Sigma Xi Attended fully funded with stipend on the Medical Scientist Training Program Grant University of California, San Francisco | San Francisco, CA 08/2015 – 06/2016 University of California, Berkeley | Berkeley, CA Master of Engineering in Translational Medicine, M.Eng. University of California, San Diego | La Jolla,
    [Show full text]