DOCSLIB.ORG

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei, 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei, 6 GERMAR RUDOLF · RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY Germar Rudolf Resistance Is Obligatory Address to the Mannheim District Court 15 November 2006 to 29 January 2007 Castle Hill Publishers P.O. Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK April 2012 Germar Rudolf: Resistance Is Obligatory: Address to the Mannheim District Court 15 November 2006 to 29 January 2007 Uckfield, UK: CASTLE HILL PUBLISHERS P.O. Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK April 2012Uckfield (East Sussex): Castle Hill Publishers PO Box 243, Uckfield TN22 9AW, UK ISBN: 978-1-59148-030-3 © by Germar Rudolf 50% of the proceeds from the sales of this book will be paid to the author. Set in Times New Roman. www.GermarRudolf.com If this site cannot be reached, please try an anonymizing service. Cover: In the background Galileo Galilei. Below from left to right and top to bottom: Martin Luther, Nicolaus Copernicus, Karl. R. Popper, Henry David Thoreau, Mahatma Gandhi. www.vho.org/GB/books/rio GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY Contents page Foreword by Daniel McGowan ............................................................ 9 A. Introduction .................................................................................... 31 I. A Peaceful Dissident’s Ordeal ................................................... 31 II. General Remarks about my Defense .......................................... 49 B. Scientific Considerations ................................................................ 51 I. The Human Aspect ..................................................................... 51 1. Conflict between the State and the Curiosity Creature .......... 51 2. Urge for Truth and Human Dignity ........................................ 57 II. Essentials .................................................................................... 58 III.Principles .................................................................................... 61 IV.The German Constitutional High Court on the Definition of Science ....................................................................................... 92 V. Science and the Public ................................................................. 95 C. Judicial Considerations .................................................................. 99 I. A Comparison of Two Systems of Justice ................................. 99 II. Definition of a Political Prisoner .............................................. 109 III.Development of the Law .......................................................... 116 IV.Legal Situation ......................................................................... 122 1. Prime Guideline ................................................................... 122 2. Civil Rights and Conflicting Civil Rights ............................ 122 3. Protection of the Youth ........................................................ 129 4. Arbitrary Interpretation of Terms (Immunization against Criticism) ............................................................................ 136 D. Specific Considerations ................................................................ 143 I. General Remarks ...................................................................... 143 1. Identification with NS Measures of Persecution .................. 143 2. Exoneration of National-Socialism ...................................... 144 3. Passion ................................................................................. 147 II. Promotion Brochure ................................................................. 147 1. False Quote ........................................................................... 148 2. Omission of Exonerating Passages ...................................... 148 5 GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY III.Lectures on the Holocaust ........................................................ 151 1. General Accusations ............................................................. 152 2. Quotes .................................................................................. 153 3. Withheld Statements ............................................................ 157 4. Summary .............................................................................. 161 IV.Additional Judicial Observations ............................................. 162 V. Decisions of the Federal Assessment Agency for Media Endangering the Youth ............................................................ 165 1. Concentration Camp Stutthof ............................................... 166 2. Concentration Camp Majdanek ............................................ 167 3. Giant with Feet of Clay ........................................................ 168 4. Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Research .................... 169 5. The Rudolf Report ................................................................ 170 6. Auschwitz: Plain Facts ......................................................... 172 7. The Hoax of the Twentieth Century ..................................... 173 8. Conclusion ............................................................................ 174 E. Resistance ...................................................................................... 177 I. Fundamentals ........................................................................... 177 II. The State as the Target of Resistance ....................................... 180 III.Resistance in the FR Germany ................................................. 185 IV.Remedy .................................................................................... 194 1. Parliamentary Remedy ......................................................... 194 2. Legal Remedy ...................................................................... 196 3. Remedy by Civil Rights Organizations ................................ 196 4. Remedy by Public Protest .................................................... 197 5. Remedy by Scholars ............................................................. 197 6. Remedy by the Media .......................................................... 200 V. Violence ................................................................................... 204 Postscriptum ............................................................................. 206 6 GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY F. Conclusion ..................................................................................... 209 G. Path of Most Resistance ............................................................... 219 H. Appendices .................................................................................... 223 Appendix 1: Quotes on the Misuse of the NS Persecution of Jews .......................................................................................... 223 Appendix 2: Motions to Introduce Evidence and Their Rejection .................................................................................. 230 Appendix 3: Assessments by Expert Historians ............................. 256 1. Dr. Olaf Rose ....................................................................... 256 2. Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte ............................................................ 262 3. Critique of Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte’s Assessment ................... 292 Appendix 4: Unconstitutional Historical Dictate ........................... 305 Appendix 5: Intercession by Professors ......................................... 312 Appendix 6: Book Burning ............................................................ 337 Appendix 7: The Verdict ................................................................ 339 I. General Considerations ......................................................... 339 II. Prelude ................................................................................. 340 III. The Deal ............................................................................. 341 IV. The Pleas ............................................................................ 343 V. The Oral Verdict .................................................................. 343 VI. The Written Verdict ........................................................... 351 Appendix 8: Declarations by Defense Lawyers ............................. 355 Appendix 9: Defense prohibited ..................................................... 362 Appendix 10: Life Continues ......................................................... 366 7 GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY Birthday, © Germar Rudolf 2006 A little over two months after my arrest in the U.S. and after my deporta- tion to Germany, at the beginning of the Christmas church service of 2005 in the Stuttgart-Stammheim penitentiary, every inmate received a red rose. I tied mine to a shelf board in my cell so that it would dry. Not quite two months later I drew this rose with a ball point pen based on my shriveled-up dry rose (unshriveling it in my mind) and sent it to my wife on occasion of the first birthday of our daughter. This was the start of roughly two years of artistic activities behind bars. Some of the pencil drawings on paper are reproduced in this book. 8 GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY Foreword by Daniel McGowan I am Not a Holocaust Denier I have never voiced or written an opinion on the veracity of the sa- cred tenets of the predominant contemporary Holocaust narrative. Those who support that narrative1 and those who would revise it both agree that these tenets can be reduced to three simple beliefs, namely 1) that six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis, 2) that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Germar Rudolf's Bungled
    Bungled: “DENYING THE HOLOCAUST” Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust” How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory Germar Rudolf !"# !$ %&' Germar Rudolf : Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust”: How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory Uckfield, East Sussex: CASTLE HILL PUBLISHERS PO Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK 2nd edition, April 2017 ISBN10: 1-59148-177-5 (print edition) ISBN13: 978-1-59148-177-5 (print edition) Published by CASTLE HILL PUBLISHERS Manufactured worldwide © 2017 by Germar Rudolf Set in Garamond GERMAR RUDOLF· BUNGLED: “DENYING THE HOLOCAUST” 5 Table of Contents 1.Introduction ................................................................................... 7 2.Science and Pseudo-Science ...................................................... 15 2.1.What Is Science? ........................................................................... 15 2.2.What Is Pseudo-Science? ............................................................. 26 3.Motivations and ad Hominem Attacks ....................................... 27 3.1.Revisionist Motives According to Lipstadt ............................... 27 3.2.Revisionist Methods According to Lipstadt .............................. 40 3.3.Deborah Lipstadt’s Motives and Agenda .................................. 50 4.Revisionist Personalities ............................................................. 67 4.1.Maurice Bardèche ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smith's Report, No
    SMITH’S REPORT On the Holocaust Controversy No. 146 www.Codoh.com January 2008 Challenging the Holocaust Taboo Since 1990 THE MAN WHO SAW HIS OWN LIVER Introduction: Death and Taxes Richard “Chip” Smith Nine Banded Books is a new publishing house that has chosen to make my manu- script, The Man Who Saw His Own Liver, its first publication, which is an honor I very much appreciate. Chip Smith is the head honcho there and has done everything right, be- ginning with the imaginative idea of transposing the format of my one-character play, The Man Who Stopped Paying, into that of a short novel, The Man Who Saw His Own Liver. Not one word has been changed. It has been formatted in a simple, unique, and imaginative way, and is followed by a coda that, again, is an imaginative choice that never would have occurred to me. The Man Who Saw His Own Liver is at the printer now and we expect to have it to hand the first week in February. Following is the elegant and rather brilliant introduction written by the publisher. radley Smith is one of those writers. Like Hunter Thompson or Hubert Selby; like B Brautigan, Bukowski, or the Beats. You read him when you’re young. You read him with a rush of discovery never to be forgotten. The prose is clean and relaxed and punctuated with a distinct, tumbling, rhythmic flair. It goes down easy. It makes you want to write. The world Smith made is suffused with a restless vitality that feels personal and true.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Denial Cases and Freedom of Expression in the United States
    Holocaust Denial Cases and Freedom of Expression in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom By Charla Marie Boley Submitted to Central European University, Department of Legal Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of … M.A. in Human Rights Supervisor: Professor Vladimir Petrovic Budapest, Hungary 2016 CEU eTD Collection Copyright 2016 Central European University CEU eTD Collection i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Freedom of expression is an internationally recognized fundamental right, crucial to open societies and democracy. Therefore, when the right is utilized to proliferate hate speech targeted at especially vulnerable groups of people, societies face the uncomfortable question of how and when to limit freedom of expression. Holocaust denial, as a form of hate speech, poses such a problem. This particular form of hate speech creates specific problems unique to its “field” in that perpetrators cloak their rhetoric under a screen of academia and that initial responses typically discard it as absurd, crazy, and not worth acknowledging. The three common law jurisdictions of the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom all value free speech and expression, but depending on national legislation and jurisprudence approach the question of Holocaust denial differently. The three trials of Holocaust deniers Zundel, Irving, and the the Institute for Historical Review, a pseudo academic organization, caught the public’s attention with a significant amount of sensationalism. The manner in which the cases unfolded and their aftermath demonstrate that Holocaust denial embodies anti-Semitism and is a form of hate speech. Furthermore, examination of trial transcripts, media response, and existing scholarship, shows that combating denial in courtrooms can have the unintended consequence of further radicalizing deniers and swaying more to join their ranks.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Germar Rudolf
    HUNTING GERMAR RUDOLF Germar Rudolf Hunting Germar Rudolf Essays on a Modern-Day Witch Hunt Castle Hill Publishers PO Box 243, Uckfield TN22 9AW, UK December 2016 Germar Rudolf: Hunting Germar Rudolf: Essays on a Modern-Day Witch Hunt Uckfield (East Sussex): Castle Hill Publishers P.O. Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK December 2016 ISBN10: 1-59148-168-6 (print edition) ISBN13: 978-1-59148-168-3 (print edition) © 2016 by Germar Rudolf Distribution: Castle Hill Publishers, PO Box 243 Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK Set in Times New Roman. Cover illustrations: The author in the summer of 2003. GERMAR RUDOLF · HUNTING GERMAR RUDOLF 5 Table of Contents Page Introduction .................................................................................................. 7 1. What Makes Revisionists? ..................................................................... 17 2. The Naiveté of a Young Revisionist....................................................... 35 3. Fleeing from England ............................................................................. 49 4. Asking for Asylum ................................................................................. 87 5. Scientists Don’t Get Political Asylum .................................................. 103 6. The Trap Snaps Shut ............................................................................ 111 7. Resistance Is Obligatory ....................................................................... 121 8. A Revisionist in Prison ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herrschaftszeiten Nochmal! Ein Reader Zu Studentenverbindungen in Mainz
    Ein Reader zu Studentenverbindungen in Mainz. Vorbemerkung Obwohl es fast seit der Gründung der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 1946 auch wieder Studentenverbindungen in Mainz gab, fehlte bis 1995, als der Reader „HERRschaftszeiten!“ erschien, eine größere kritische Darstellung der Aktivitäten von Korporationen in Mainz. Da seitdem jedoch einige Jahre ins Land gegangen sind, war es an der Zeit, über einen neuen Reader nachzuden- ken, den Ihr nun in Händen haltet. Dieser neue Reader basiert außer auf den Selbstdarstellungen, Flugblättern und Semesterprogrammen auf einer weitge- henden Analyse der Korporationspresse der letzten Jahre, denn die Vorgänge innerhalb der Dachverbände lassen auch Rückschlüsse auf die Mainzer Verbin- H dungen zu. E Das Ergebnis war erschreckend. Auch auf den zweiten Blick läßt sich zeigen, R daß bei so gut wie allen Verbindungen und Dachverbänden ein Gedankengut – R insbesondere zur Frage des deutschen Volkstums – vorherrscht, daß vom Grau- S zonenbereich am rechten Rand der CDU bis hin zum offen neofaschistischen C Spektrum reicht. Zugehörige personelle Überschneidungen - nach ganz weit H rechts - lassen sich auch für Mainz nachweisen, und zwar auch in jüngster Zeit. A Neben der fruchtbaren Suche nach recht(sextrem)en Inhalten und Personen soll F auch angerissen werden, welche soziale Funktion Verbindungen in der BRD – T insbesondere als Stichwortgeber für bedeutende Parteien oder Lobbyverbände S haben. Z E Viel Spaß bei der Lektüre wünscht Euch, I T Hans A. Plast E N Inhalt 2 Einleitung 3 Die Geschichte
    [Show full text]
  • The Barnes Review a JOURNAL of POLITICALLY INCORRECT HISTORY
    Mussolini’s War is here! BRINGING HISTORY INTO ACCORD WITH THE FACTS IN THE TRADITION OF DR. HARRY ELMER BARNES Thanks to all of you who pre-ordered this book and made this project a reality! The Barnes Review A JOURNAL OF POLITICALLY INCORRECT HISTORY Mussolini’s War VOLUME XXIV NUMBER 3 MAY/JUNE 2018 WWW.BARNESREVIEW.COM Volume 1: The Triumphant Years “[T]hose who think they know World dominant power in the Mediterranean War II history will be pleasantly surprised Sea. Contrary to popular belief, Mus- to learn an incredible array of new details solini’s Fiat biplanes gave as good as about the entire scope of that conflict, they got in the Battle of Britain, and and not just as it related to Italy. And I Italy’s Savoia-Marchetti Sparrowhawk guarantee that Mussolini’s War will com- bombers accounted for 72 Allied war- pletely change general, preconceived no- ships and 196 freighters sunk. On June tions of the Second World War.” 7, 1942, infantry of the Italian X Corps —Lt. Col. FORREST P. PATTON, U.S. saved Rommel’s 15th Brigade near Marine Corps Reserve (Ret.) Gazala, in North Africa, from otherwise —— certain annihilation. mong the great misconcep- These and numerous other disclo- tions of modern times is the sures combine to debunk lingering assumption that Benito Mus- propaganda stereotypes of the inept, solini was Adolf Hitler’s jun- ineffectual Italian armed forces and A their allegedly inept commanders and ior partner, who made no significant contributions to the Axis effort in supreme leader. That dated portrayal World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • A Discourse Analysis of Holocaust Denial Web Sites
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research College of Staten Island 2004 Rewriting the Holocaust Online: A Discourse Analysis of Holocaust Denial Web Sites Mark Aaron Polger City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/si_pubs/157 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Rewriting The Holocaust Online: A Discourse Analysis of Holocaust Denial Web Sites by Mark Aaron Polger A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Sociology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2004 ©Mark Aaron Polger 2004 Table of Contents Author’s Declaration ii Borrower’s Page iii Abstract iv Acknowledgements v Dedication vi Table of Contents vii Chapter One: Introduction 1 Why Holocaust Denial? 1 What is Holocaust Denial? 2 Where Does Holocaust Denial Flourish? 4 Definitions 5 Anti-Semitism 5 Digital Library 7 Discourse 8 Discourse Analysis 8 Hate Group 9 Historical Revisionism 9 Holocaust 11 Holocaust Trivialization 12 Legitimacy 14 Race 15 Zionism 16 The Holocaust Today 18 Thesis Questions 20 How do deniers attempt to attain legitimacy through their web pages? 20 What rhetorical strategies do they employ on their web sites? 21 Thesis Outline 22 Chapter Two: Literature Review 23 Holocaust Denial on the Internet 23 Holocaust
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Die Revisionisten Und Die Chemie Josef Bailer Die Naturwissenschaft Ist Wertfrei Und Naturgesetze Gelten Gleichermaßen Für N
    Die Revisionisten und die Chemie Josef Bailer Die Naturwissenschaft ist wertfrei und Naturgesetze gelten gleichermaßen für Nazis und Antifaschisten. Mit solchem Anspruch wollen die "Revisionisten" für ihre politischen Ansichten Stimmung machen. Was vom naturwissenschaftlichen Anspruch der "Auschwitzlüge" zu halten ist, soll exemplarisch an drei einschlägigen Publikationen, dem Leuchter-Bericht, dem Rudolf-Gutachten und dem Lüftl-Report, dargelegt werden. Fred Leuchter, der Hinrichtungsexperte Der Leuchter-Bericht1 beschreibt im Detail die Verhältnisse in den Hinrichtungskammern amerikanischer Gefängnisse und setzt voraus, daß die Gaskammern im NS-Konzentra- tionslager Auschwitz auf die gleiche Weise betrieben worden wären und daher in den technischen Details gleich ausgesehen haben müßten2. Solche Annahmen erscheinen vielleicht auf den ersten Blick plausibel, zumal dasselbe Giftgas, Blausäure, verwendet wurde, sie entsprechen aber nicht den historischen Gegebenheiten. Die Situation in den NS-Vernichtungslagern war der in amerikanischen Gefängnissen überhaupt nicht ver- gleichbar. Fred Leuchter hält die Gaskammern für unzureichend abgedichtet, meint, das Gas hätte durch Mauern und Türritzen sickern, entweichen, die Wachmannschaften töten, und schließlich, zumindest in den Fällen, in denen die Gaskammern in der Nähe der Krematorien gelegen sind, vom Feuer entzündet, explodieren müssen. Außerdem meint er, die Gaskammern wären zu kalt und feucht gewesen, sodaß sich das Giftgas nur ungenügend entwickeln hätte können, und sie hätten keine Ventilation und keine ausreichende Entlüftung gehabt, sodaß mehrere Tage gelüftet hätte werden müssen, Fred Leuchter, Der Leuchter-Bericht. Im deutschsprachigen Raum wurden zwei Fassungen bekannt, die sich im Inhalt nicht unwesentlich voneinander unterscheiden. Eine Fassung wurde von Walter Ochens- berger verbreitet, eine andere von Dipl. Pol. Udo Walendy. Leuchter-Bericht, Absatz 12.001: "..
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting the Holocaust: the Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory.”
    DISSECTING THE HOLOCAUST Germar Rudolf (Ed.) Dissecting the Holocaust The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’ Castle Hill Publishers P.O. Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK November 2019 HOLOCAUST HANDBOOKS, Volume 1: Germar Rudolf (ed.): Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory.” Uckfield, East Sussex: CASTLE HILL PUBLISHERS PO Box 243, Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK Third, revised edition, November 2019 Translated by Sonja Ruthard ISBN10: 1-59148-227-5 (print edition) ISBN13: 978-1-59148-227-7 (print edition) ISSN 1529-7748 Published by CASTLE HILL PUBLISHERS Manufactured in the United States of America and in the UK © 2000, 2003, 2019 by Castle Hill Publishers, Uckfield, UK Distribution: Castle Hill Publishers PO Box 243 Uckfield, TN22 9AW, UK https://shop.codoh.com www.HolocaustHandbooks.com If these sites are inaccessible in the country where you live, try an online anonymizing service. Set in Times New Roman. Cover Design: Background: Holocaust monument in the center of Berlin, Germany; foreground: the forensic surgeon’s instruments to dissect a cadaver… GERMAR RUDOLF (ED.) · DISSECTING THE HOLOCAUST 5 Table of Contents Page Preface to the 2019 Edition ............................................................................................... 7 GERMAR RUDOLF Preface to the 1994 Edition ............................................................................................... 9 ROBERT FAURISSON The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews ................................................ 15 GERMAR
    [Show full text]
  • The Web of Hate: an Exploratory Study of Holocaust Denial on the Net
    THE WEB OF HATE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF HOLOCAUST DENIAL ON THE NET Daniela Di Giacomo B.A. (Hon), University of Ottawa, 2002 D.E.C., CEGEP John Abbott, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, 1999 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the School of Criminology O Daniela Di Giacomo 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Simon Fraser University Ethics Approval The author, whose name appears on the title page of this work, has obtained human research ethics approval from the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics for the research described in this work, or has conducted the research as a member of a project or course approved by the Ethics Office. A copy of the approval letter has been filed at the Theses Office of the University Library at the time of submission of this thesis or project. The original application for ethics approval and letter of approval is filed with the Office of Research Ethics. Inquiries may be directed to that Office. Bennett Library Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada Holocaust denial is one manifestation of racist and antisemitic thought, the scope of which has increased dramatically over the last decade, especially on the Internet. This thesis applies an anti-racism framework to the study of Holocaust denial on the Internet with the objectives of identifying the key claims made by Holocaust deniers, the themes emerging from these claims, and how practitioners working in the fight against hate understand and identify the phenomenon of Holocaust denial.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigitte Bailer Leuchter Und Seine Epigonen Als Sich 1988 Der Neonazistische Deutsch-Kanadier Ernst Zündel Wegen Leugnung Des H
    Brigitte Bailer Leuchter und seine Epigonen Als sich 1988 der neonazistische Deutsch-Kanadier Ernst Zündel wegen Leugnung des Holocaust vor dem District Court in Toronto zu verantworten hatte, warb er mit Hilfe des französischen "Revisionisten" Robert Faurisson1 den US-Amerikaner Fred Leuchter, angeblicher Experte für die Konstruktion von Hinrichtungseinrichtungen in heutigen amerikanischen Gefängnissen, als Zeugen der Verteidigung an. Leuchter reiste im Auftrag Zündels nach Polen, wo er die Gedenkstätten Auschwitz und Majdanek besuchte und dort heimlich und illegal Mauerstücke entfernte. Diese ließ er später nach eigenen Aussagen in einem amerikanischen Labor auf etwaige Reste von Blausäure untersuchen2. Aufgrund der angeblichen Untersuchungsergebnisse verfaßte Leuchter einen umfangreichen Bericht, der jedoch vom District Court in Toronto im Zündel-Prozeß entgegen den Wünschen von Zündels Verteidiger weder als Gutachten noch als Beweismittel anerkannt und nur zu Dokumentationszwecken den Akten beigefügt wurde3. Ein gerichtlich anerkanntes Leuchter- Gutachten existiert daher nicht. Das Gericht billigte Leuchter keinen Expertenstatus zu: "He hasn't any expertise" ("Er hat keine Fachkenntnisse")4. Mit diesem - in jedem Fall zum Scheitern verurteilten - Versuch, mit Hilfe naturwissenschaftlicher Methoden die Tatsächlichkeit des Holocaust zu leugnen, begründete Fred Leuchter eine neue Spielart "revisionistischer" Argumentationstechnik, die mittlerweile eine Reihe von Nachhahmern gefunden hat. Bemerkungen zur Person Fred Leuchters Leuchter wurde und wird in der "revisionistischen" Publizistik als "Gaskammern-Experte" präsentiert. Doch bereits während seiner Zeugenaussage im Zündel-Prozeß in Toronto mußte er im Kreuzverhör zugeben, weder über eine technische, noch eine toxikologische oder medizinische Ausbildung zu verfügen.5 Dies 1 Siehe das Kapitel "Revisionistische" Autoren. 2 Der Beleg dafür fehlt jedoch in den deutschen Fassungen des Leuchter-Berichtes.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Spell
    HHOLOCAUSTOLOCAUST HHANDBOOKANDBOOK SSERIESERIES ∙ VVOLUMEOLUME 3311 3311 HHOLOCAUSTOLOCAUST HHANDBOOKANDBOOK SSERIESERIES ∙ VVOLUMEOLUME 3311 THE HOLOCAUST NARRATIVE: K KOLLERSTROM O DDrr NNicholasicholas KKollerstromollerstrom POLITICS TRUMPS SCIENCE L “The fastest way to get expelled from a British university is by L saying you are looking at chemical evidence for how Zyklon was E used in World War II, with a discussion of how delousing technology R functioned in the German World War II labour camps” S —Nicholas Kollerstrom T The situation is completely absurd. No subject generates responses as R BBREAREAKKINGING extreme and irrational as what has come to be known as “the Holo- O caust.” Unlike any other event in human history, including even the M most sacred religious beliefs, for anyone to question, dispute or deny TTHEHE its occurrence qualifi es as “a hate crime,” where Holocaust denial is ∙ ∙ BREAKING THE SPELL BREAKING even a prosecutable offense in certain jurisdictions. Unlike any other, this crime involves the expression of forbidden thoughts about a sub- B ject that has become taboo. In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” R code. This undermined the German war effort—but also threw new E A SSPELLPELL light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communi- K cations between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were inter- I cepted and decrypted. Oddly enough, historians have largely ignored N the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “arrivals,” G THE HOLOCAUST: “departures,” recorded deaths and other events at these camps. T The only reasonable explanation is that the intercepted data contra- H dicts, even refutes, the orthodox “Holocaust” narrative.
    [Show full text]