DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocaust Denial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holocaust Denial Holocaust Denial Holocaust Denial The Politics of Perfidy Edited by Robert Solomon Wistrich Co-published by The Hebrew University Magnes Press (Jerusalem) and De Gruyter (Berlin/Boston) for the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism DE GRUYTER MAGNES An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org We would like to acknowledge the support of the Fondation pour la Mémoire de la Shoah in Paris which made possible the publication of this volume. Editorial Manager: Alifa Saadya An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 ISSN 0179-0986 e-ISSN 0179-3256 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. ISBNLibrary 978-3-11-028814-8 of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data e-ISBNA CIP catalog 978-3-11-028821-9 record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek LibraryDie Deutsche of Congress Nationalbibliothek Cataloging-in-Publication verzeichnet diese Data Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliogra- ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 Afie; CIP detaillierte catalog record bibliografische for this book Daten has sindbeen im applied Internet for über at the Library of Congress. http://dnb.dnb.dee-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 abrufbar. e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek ISSN 0179-0986 The© 2016 Deutsche Walter Nationalbibliothek de Gruyter GmbH, listsBerlin/Boston this publication in the Deutsche e-ISSN 0179-3256 Nationalbibliografie;Druck und Bindung: Duck & Co., detailed bibliographic Ortsname data are available in the Internet http://dnb.dnb.de♾ Gedruckt auf säurefreiem abrufbar. Papier Printed in Germany © 2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, &www.degruyter.com Hebrew University Magnes Press, Jerusalem as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Typesetting: Michael Peschke, Berlin Printing: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data U Gedruckt auf säurefreiem Papier A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Printed in Germany Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek www.degruyter.com Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliogra- fie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. © 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Druck und Bindung: Duck & Co., Ortsname ♾ Gedruckt auf säurefreiem Papier Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Robert Solomon Wistrich Introduction: Lying about the Holocaust 1 Michael Shafir Denying the Shoah in Post-Communist Eastern Europe 27 Joanna Michlic The Jedwabne Debate: Reshaping Polish National Mythology 67 Simon Epstein Roger Garaudy, Abbé Pierre and the French Negationists 85 Alain Goldschläger The Trials of Ernst Zündel 109 Milton Shain and Margo Bastos Muslim Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism in Postwar South Africa 137 Danny Ben-Moshe Holocaust Denial “Down Under” 157 Rotem Kowner The Strange Case of Japanese “Revisionism” 181 Mark Weitzman Globalization, Conspiracy Theory, and the Shoah 195 Jeffrey Herf Broadcasting Antisemitism to the Middle East: Nazi Propaganda during the Holocaust 213 Matthias Küntzel Judeophobia and the Denial of the Holocaust in Iran 235 vi Table of Contents Robert Solomon Wistrich Negationism, Antisemitism, and Anti-Zionism 257 Notes on Contributors 269 Index 271 Robert Solomon Wistrich Introduction: Lying about the Holocaust Holocaust denial is a postwar phenomenon at whose core lies the rejection of the historical fact that six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis during World War II. Alongside explicit repudiation of the Holocaust, denial includes the minimiza- tion, banalization, and relativization of the relevant facts and events, so as to cast doubt on the uniqueness or authenticity of what happened during the Shoah.¹ These softer variants of Holocaust denial are designed to gain public accep- tance for its viewpoint as the “other side” of a legitimate debate. According to the hardline deniers or “revisionists” (as they misleadingly describe themselves), the extermination of the Jews never actually took place: the German authorities never planned to kill the Jews of Europe, and they never built or operated any death camps in which Jews were gassed. Most revisionist accounts rarely put Jewish losses between 1939 and 1945 above 300,000 persons, and these deaths are usually blamed on wartime deprivations, hardship, and disease. According to the deniers, the Nazi concept of a “Final Solution” always meant only the emigration of the Jews, not their annihilation. The Jews “missing” from Europe after 1945 are assumed to have resurfaced in the United States (as illegal immigrants), in Israel, or elsewhere. The massive documentation on the Holo- caust—including official papers of the Third Reich, statements by Nazi criminals, eyewitness accounts by Jewish survivors, diaries, memoirs, and the mountains of evidence from court trials—are invariably dismissed by deniers as unreliable and fantastic or as an outright lie.² For the deniers, no testimony by Jews is acceptable, because it was the Jews who invented the Holocaust “myth” in the first place, to serve their own financial and political ends. In the same way, all the volumes of 1 For earlier overviews of the subject, see Gill Seidel, The Holocaust Denial (Leeds 1986); Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Assassins of Memory. Essays on the Denial of the Holocaust (New York 1992); and Deborah E. Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (Toronto 1993). A more recent study is Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman, Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened and Why Do They Say It? (Berkeley, Calif. 2002). On French Holocaust denial, see Florent Brayard, Comment l’idée vint à M. Rassinier, Naissance du révisionnisme (Paris 1996); Nadine Fresco, Fabrication d’un antisémite (Paris 1999); and Valérie Igounet, Histoire du négationnisme en France (Paris 2000). 2 For typical examples of this literature, see Paul Rassinier, Le drame des Juifs Européens (Paris 1964); Thies Christopherson, Die Auschwitz Lüge (Mohrkirch 1973); Richard Harwood [pseud. of Richard Verrall], Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth at Last (Ladbroke 1974); and Arthur Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (Torrance, Calif. 1976). The last two works were published by the Historical Review Press in the United Kingdom. 2 Robert Solomon Wistrich documentation assembled by the Allies at the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal in 1946 are rejected: they are seen as part of a vengeful act of injustice by the victors, who stand accused by the deniers of having mistreated the Germans.³ According to the godfather of American “revisionist” historians, Harry Elmer Barnes, what Germans suffered at Allied hands—bombing of civilians in German cities, starvation, invasion, and the mass expulsions of ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe after 1945—was far “more brutal and painful than the alleged exterminations in the gas chambers.”⁴ As for postwar Nazi testimony, the deniers allege that German defendants had no choice after 1945 but to confess guilt to false charges in the hope of receiving clemency. Confessions such as those of the Auschwitz commandant, Rudolf Höss, are routinely regarded by Holocaust deniers as having been extracted through the use of torture and humiliation. The mendacious propaganda of the Holocaust deniers relies on a number of standard techniques. They like to focus relentlessly on any discrepancies in the testimonies of witnesses, contradictions in documents or disagreements among scholars, in order to undermine the credibility of what they call the Holocaust “story.” They make much play of the fact that no explicit order from Hitler for a mass murder of the Jews has been found; that the Wannsee Conference of January 1942 did not refer to gassings in the present or future; or that Allied aerial recon- naissance of Auschwitz did not indicate gas chambers or crematoria with con- stantly burning chimneys. The deniers also cynically exploit the ambiguity of Nazi euphemisms like Sonderbehandlung (special treatment) for the gassing of Jews to suggest that this term actually mean “privileged” treatment. They provide similarly fake interpretations for the forced “evacuation” of Jews to the East.⁵ The “revisionists” usually explain away the large number of crematoria in the death camps by claiming that these were a means of dealing rapidly with 3 See Maurice Bardèche, Nuremberg ou la Terre promise (Paris 1948); Paul Rassinier, Le Mensonge d’Ulysse (Paris 1950); Richard Harwood [pseud. of Richard Verrall],
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Il Negazionismo. Storia Di Una Menzogna 1
    Il negazionismo. Storia di una menzogna 1 Il negazionismo. Storia di una menzogna di Claudio Vercelli Il fenomeno del «negazionismo olocaustico», ovvero del rifiuto di considerare come effettivamente avvenuto lo sterminio degli ebrei per mano nazista data, nella sua origine, al momento stesso in cui l’Olocausto andava realizzandosi. La rimozione dell’evidenza storica è infatti parte di una più ampia strategia che si pone l’obiettivo di perpetuare ideologicamente il nazismo e i fascismi medesimi, evitando che ad essi siano imputate le loro concrete responsabilità, a partire dagli omicidi di massa di cui si sono ripetutamente macchiati. Gli assassini, infatti, nel mentre procedevano alla distruzione delle comunità ebraiche europee si adoperavano anche per occultare quanto stavano facendo. Chi, a guerra finita, ha sostenuto che quel che era successo “in realtà” non sarebbe mai accaduto, ha recuperato i motivi e i moventi che stavano alla base del tragico operato del Terzo Reich e dei suoi scherani. Il negazionismo, quindi, non è una ipotesi di interpretazione dei fatti alternativa alla storiografica “ufficiale” ma la negazione dell’evidenza. Affrontarne la sua presenza e perduranza, non solo come fenomeno ristretto, di nicchia, a tratti quasi amatoriale bensì in quanto falsificazione dei fatti, implica non solo tutelare la memoria del passato ma anche e soprattutto difendere il presente da qualsiasi manipolazione. La posta in gioco è la formazione dell’opinione pubblica. Poiché, come afferma George Orwell nel suo romanzo 1984: «chi controlla il passato controlla il futuro». La bibliografia qui proposta è stata curata da Claudio Vercelli in occasione della presentazione del suo volume Il negazionismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives and Human Rights
    12 Truth, memory, and reconciliation in post- communist societies The Romanian experience and the Securitate archives Marius Stan and Vladimir Tismaneanu Introduction Coming to terms with the past, confronting its legacies and burden, was the inevitable starting point for the new democracies of Eastern Europe. Thirty years after the fall of communism, both public intellectuals and scholars face a fundamental question: how can truth and justice be rein- stated in a post-totalitarian community without the emergence of what Nietzsche called the “reek of cruelty”? In 2006, for the first time in Roma- nia’s contemporary history, the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania (PCACDR) rejected outright the practices of institutionalized forgetfulness and generated a national debate about long-denied and concealed moments of the communist past (includ- ing instances of collaboration, complicity, etc.). One of these authors (VT) had the honor of being appointed Chair of this state-body. He was one of the co- coordinators of its Final Report.1 Generally speaking, decommuni- zation is, in its essence, a moral, political, and intellectual process.2 The PCACDR Report answered a fundamental necessity, characteristic of the post-authoritarian world, that of moral clarity. Only memory and history can furnish responsibility, justice, retribution, and repentance. Reconcilia- tion and the healing of a nation plagued by the traumatic quagmire of Evil depend on the recognition and non-negotiability of human dignity as a pri- mordial moral truth of the new society. Context In January 2007, Romania acceded to the European Union, a few years after having entered the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
    [Show full text]
  • HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS a FORM of HATE SPEECH Raphael Cohen
    HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS A FORM OF HATE SPEECH ∗∗∗ Raphael Cohen-Almagor Introduction Recently Facebook confirmed that it has disabled a group called ‘I Hate Muslims in Oz.’ Barry Schnitt explained: “We disabled the ‘I Hate Muslims in Oz’ group… because it contained an explicit statement of hate. Where Holocaust-denial groups have done this and been reported, we’ve taken the same action”.1 Facebook distinguishes between ‘explicit statement of hate’ and Holocaust denial. Its directors believe that Holocaust denial is not hateful per se and does not therefore contravene the company’s terms of service. The terms of service say: “You will not post content that is hateful, threatening, pornographic, or that contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence”. 2 Schnitt said: “We’re always discussing and evaluating our policies on reported content, but have no plans to change this policy at this time. In addition to discussing it internally, we continue to engage with third-party experts on the issue”.3 In this short piece I wish to take issue with the assertion that Holocaust denial is not hateful per se . My aim is to show that it is, and therefore that Facebook should reconsider its position. All Internet providers and web- hosting companies whose terms of service disallow hateful messages on their servers should not host or provide forums for such hate-mongering. This is of urgent need as Holocaust denial is prevalent in Europe, the United States (USA) and across the Arab and Muslim parts of the world. Iran’s regime, under the disputed leadership of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has made questioning the Holocaust one of the centerpieces of its radical ∗ Educator, researcher and human rights activist.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition
    TITLE : COMMUNISM AND POST-COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA : CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AUTHOR : VLADIMIR TISMANEANU, University of Marylan d THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FO R EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 LEGAL NOTICE The Government of the District of Columbia has certified an amendment of th e Articles of Incorporation of the National Council for Soviet and East European Research changing the name of the Corporation to THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, effective on June 9, 1997. Grants, contracts and all other legal engagements of and with the Corporation made unde r its former name are unaffected and remain in force unless/until modified in writin g by the parties thereto . PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Marylan d PR1NCIPAL 1NVEST1GATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 81 1-2 3 DATE : March 26, 1998 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded by contract with the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows : Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Controversies Over Holocaust Memory and Holocaust Revisionism in Poland and Moldova
    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman March 2014 HOLOCAUST MEMORY AND HOLOCAUST DENIAL IN POLAND AND MOLDOVA: A COMPARISON Natalia Sineaeva-Pankowska* Executive Summary After 1989, post-communist countries such as Poland and Moldova have been faced with the challenge of reinventing their national identity and rewriting their master narratives, shifting from a communist one to an ethnic-patriotic one. In this context, the fate of local Jews and the actions of Poles and Moldovans during the Holocaust have repeatedly proven difficult or even impossible to incorporate into the new national narrative. As a result, Holocaust denial in various forms initially gained ground in post-communist countries, since denying the Holocaust, or blaming it on someone else, even on the Jews themselves, was the easiest way to strengthen national identities. In later years, however, Polish and Moldovan paths towards re-definition of self have taken different paths. At least in part, this can be explained as a product of Poland's incorporation in the European unification project, while Moldova remains in limbo, both in terms of identity and politics – between the Soviet Union and Europe, between the past and the future. Introduction This paper focuses on the debate over Holocaust memory and its link to national identity in two post-communist countries, Poland and Moldova, after 1989. Although their historical, political and social contexts and other factors differ, both countries possess a similar, albeit not identical, communist legacy, and both countries had to accept ‘inconvenient’ truths, such as participation of members of one’s own nation in the Holocaust, while building-rebuilding their new post-communist national identities during a period of social and political transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine
    www.doew.at Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: The Evolution of a Doctrine Published in: Hermann Kurthen/Rainer Erb/Werner Bergmann (ed.), Anti-Sem- itism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification, New York–Oxford 1997 Development of “revisionism” since 1945 Most people understand so called „revisionism“ as just another word for the movement of holocaust denial (Benz 1994; Lipstadt 1993; Shapiro 1990). Therefore it was suggested lately to use the word „negationism“ instead. How- ever in the author‘s point of view „revisionism“ covers some more topics than just the denying of the National Socialist mass murders. Especially in Germany and Austria there are some more points of National Socialist politics some people have tried to minimize or apologize since 1945, e. g. the responsibility for World War II, the attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 (quite a modern topic), (the discussion) about the number of the victims of the holocaust a. s. o.. In the seventies the late historian Martin Broszat already called that movement „run- ning amok against reality“ (Broszat 1976). These pseudo-historical writers, many of them just right wing extremist publishers or people who quite rapidly turned to right wing extremists, really try to prove that history has not taken place, just as if they were able to make events undone by denying them. A conception of “negationism” (Auerbach 1993a; Fromm and Kernbach 1994, p. 9; Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz 1994) or “holocaust denial” (Lipstadt 1993, p. 20) would neglect the additional components of “revision- ism”, which are logically connected with the denying of the holocaust, this being the extreme variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Community Advocacy in Canada
    JEWISH COMMUNITY ADVOCACY IN CANADA As the advocacy arm of the Jewish Federations of Canada, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs is a non-partisan organization that creates and implements strategies for the purpose of improving the quality of Jewish life in Canada and abroad, increasing support for Israel, and strengthening the Canada-Israel relationship. Previously, the Jewish community in Canada had been well served for decades by two primary advocacy organizations: Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) and Canada-Israel Committee (CIC). Supported by the organized Jewish community through Jewish Federations of Canada – UIA, these agencies responded to the needs and reflected the consensus within the Canadian Jewish Community. Beginning in 2004, the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA) served as the management umbrella for CJC and CIC and, with the establishment of the University Outreach Committee (UOC), worked to address growing needs on Canadian campuses. Until 2011, each organization was governed and directed by independent Boards of Directors and professional staff. In 2011, these separate bodies were consolidated into one comprehensive and streamlined structure, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, which has been designed as the single address for all advocacy issues of concern to Canadian Jewry. The new structure provides for a robust, cohesive, and dynamic organization to represent the aspirations of Jewish Canadians across the country. As a non-partisan organization, the Centre creates and implements strategies to improve the quality of Jewish life in Canada and abroad, advance the public policy interests of the Canadian Jewish community, enhance ties with Jewish communities around the world, and strengthen the Canada-Israel relationship to the benefit of both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. the Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust by Max Beer
    Curr Psychol DOI 10.1007/s12144-007-9017-3 The Montreal Jewish Community and the Holocaust Max Beer # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract In 1993 Hitler and the Nazi party came to power in Germany. At the same time, in Canada in general and in Montreal in particular, anti-Semitism was becoming more widespread. The Canadian Jewish Congress, as a result of the growing tension in Europe and the increase in anti-Semitism at home, was reborn in 1934 and became the authoritative voice of Canadian Jewry. During World War II the Nazis embarked on a campaign that resulted in the systematic extermination of millions of Jews. This article focuses on the Montreal Jewish community, its leadership, and their response to the fate of European Jewry. The study pays particular attention to the Canadian Jewish Congress which influenced the outlook of the community and its subsequent actions. As the war progressed, loyalty to Canada and support for the war effort became the overriding issues for the community and the leadership and concern for their European brethren faded into the background. Keywords Anti-Semitism . Holocaust . Montreal . Quebec . Canada . Bronfman . Uptowners . Downtowners . Congress . Caiserman The 1930s, with the devastating worldwide economic depression and the emergence of Nazism in Germany, set the stage for a war that would result in tens of millions of deaths and the mass extermination of Europe’s Jews. The decade marked a complete stoppage of Jewish immigration to Canada, an increase in anti-Semitism on the North American continent, and the revival of the Canadian Jewish Congress as the voice for the Canadian Jewish community.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Denial in Australia
    ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of Holocaust denial in Australia. It does so through a study of the beliefs and activities of the three organizations for whom Holocaust denial is a central belief: the Australian League of Rights, the Australian Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Adelaide Institute. Their activities, their international ties, and their relationship with the broader racist Right in Australia is considered. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future directions and responses to Holocaust denial. INTRODUCTION The nature of Australian Holocaust denial organizations, their activities, and their place in broader far Right circles is different from denial organizations in other countries. This is explained by the dominant role of the Australian League of Rights in far Right politics, the civil liberties origins of the Australian Civil Liberties Union, the lack of sizeable neo- Nazi groups in Australia, and the dominance of anti-Aboriginal and anti- Asian issues on the far Right agenda. In addition, unlike many European countries where denial is explained as a response to their wartime collaboration with the Nazis, this motive does not exist in Australia which fought against the Nazis and her allies. Although Holocaust denial is a fringe activity in Australia, it has significantly increased over the last two decades with a concomitant growth in collaboration between Australian and overseas Holocaust deniers. This is not just a Jewish concern for Holocaust deniers have become a leading element within the racist Right with whom they share a common worldview. This is because in addition to their antisemitism, Australian Holocaust deniers expound racist and xenophobic policies and views.
    [Show full text]
  • Jusqu'au Dernier Jour
    Jusqu'au dernier jour PIERRE-BLOCH Jusqu'au dernier jour MÉMOIRES Albin Michel « H comme Histoire » Collection dirigée par Philippe Bourdrel © Éditions Albin Michel S.A., 1983 22, rue Huyghens, 75014 Paris ISBN 2-226-01920-0 ISSN 0755-1754 Le souvenir est un poète, n'en fais pas un historien. Georges Clemenceau A ma femme Le temps du souvenir Je n'ai pas la prétention d'être un historien même si je me plonge souvent dans les manuels d'histoire. Ce livre, reflet de ma mémoire, narre une histoire : la mienne avec son cortège de souvenirs et de portraits. J'y évoque des grands hommes et des moins grands. Certains furent des proches et avec d'autres j'ai participé à quelques événements de ce siècle. Il se peut que certains d'entre eux soient des inconnus pour vous. Il n'y a pas que la mort pour effacer le souvenir, le temps y contribue, aussi, allégrement. Je doute que beaucoup, de ceux qui me liront, se souviennent ou aient simplement entendu évoquer les noms de Paul Mounet, même si la ville de Bergerac possède une statue des célèbres frères Mounet, Mary Garden, Poincaré, Viviani, Jean Longuet, Frossard et bien d'autres encore. J'ai connu et rencontré ces hommes. L'histoire passe, broyant tout sur sa route. Dans quelques années, si le bachot existe toujours, des cancres feront de Foch et de Joffre des maréchaux d'Empire et, de la même manière, penseront que de Gaulle était un traître et que l'ex-maréchal Pétain a prononcé l'appel du 18 juin.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander B. Stohler Modern American Hategroups: Lndoctrination Through Bigotry, Music, Yiolence & the Internet
    Alexander B. Stohler Modern American Hategroups: lndoctrination Through Bigotry, Music, Yiolence & the Internet Alexander B. Stohler FacultyAdviser: Dr, Dennis Klein r'^dw May 13,2020 )ol, Masters of Arts in Holocaust & Genocide Studies Kean University In partialfulfillumt of the rcquirementfar the degee of Moster of A* Abstract: I focused my research on modern, American hate groups. I found some criteria for early- warning signs of antisemitic, bigoted and genocidal activities. I included a summary of neo-Nazi and white supremacy groups in modern American and then moved to a more specific focus on contemporary and prominent groups like Atomwaffen Division, the Proud Boys, the Vinlanders Social Club, the Base, Rise Against Movement, the Hammerskins, and other prominent antisemitic and hate-driven groups. Trends of hate-speech, acts of vandalism and acts of violence within the past fifty years were examined. Also, how law enforcement and the legal system has responded to these activities has been included as well. The different methods these groups use for indoctrination of younger generations has been an important aspect of my research: the consistent use of hate-rock and how hate-groups have co-opted punk and hardcore music to further their ideology. Live-music concerts and festivals surrounding these types of bands and how hate-groups have used music as a means to fund their more violent activities have been crucial components of my research as well. The use of other forms of music and the reactions of non-hate-based artists are also included. The use of the internet, social media and other digital means has also be a primary point of discussion.
    [Show full text]