DOCSLIB.ORG

Amsterdam / Schiphol Airport Aerodrome Chart Ad 2.Eham-Adc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amsterdam / Schiphol Airport Aerodrome Chart Ad 2.Eham-Adc AMSTERDAM / SCHIPHOL AIRPORT AD 2.EHAM-ADC AIP NETHERLANDS AERODROME CHART 12 JAN 12 X MARKING AIDS RWY 04/22 AD 2.EHAM-ADC G5 G4 G3 G2 G1 S3 S4 S1 S2 S5 S6 S7 TURN AROUND MARKING RWY 06/24 S2 E6 RWY 09/27 N9 N5 N4 N3 N2 N1 W11 W12 RWY 18C/36C PRECISION APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM (CAT III) W10 W9 W8 W7 W6 W5 W4 W3 W2 W1 E1 E2 E5 E3 E4 E6 RWY 18L/36R X X E3 E4 E5 G5 DISPLACED THR 270 m RWY 18R/36L ELEV -13 ft GP 334.400 TURN AROUND SCHIPHOL / VPB MARKING V4 CH38X V3 V2 V1 52°21’26’’N 004°42’50’’E 0 PAPI PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTION BEARING THR RWY SURFACE GEO STRENGTH COORDINATES 52°18’01.34’’N AD ELEV -11 ft AMSL 04 041.25° PCN79/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°47’00.54’’E 52°18’50.49’’N 22 221.27° PCN79/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°48’10.89’’E 52°17’20.87’’N 06 057.92° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°44’14.25’’E 52°18’16.49’’N 24 237.95° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°46’39.06’’E 52°19’00.08’’N 09 086.78° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 3800 x 60 m 004°44’51.58’’E 52°19’06.15’’N 27 266.82° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°47’48.81’’E 52°19’53.03’’N 18C 183.22° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°44’24.11’’E CAUTION: 3920 x 300 m 52°18’20.99’’N DO NOT MISTAKE 36C 003.22° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH HIGHWAY FOR RUNWAY 004°44’15.66’’E 52°18’58.14’’N V1 18L 183.25° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°46’46.89’’E 52°17’26.97’’N 36R 003.25° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°46’38.45’’E RWY 18R/36L 52°21’36.93’’N 18R 183.20° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°42’42.21’’E 52°19’42.89’’N 36L 003.20° PCN90/F/C/W/T ASPH 004°42’31.81’’E V2 PRECISION APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM All RWYs except RWY 04/22 and 18R/36L: FIRE (CAT III) STATION RWY shoulders of 15 m width on both sides (strength restricted). RWY 04/22 and 18R/36L: RWY shoulders of 7.5 m width on both sides (strength restricted). RWY 09/27: Weight restricted MAX 450 000 kg due to tunnel. Y2 Y1 SCHIPHOL / SPL RWY 18L and RWY 36L: LOC 108.400 / CH21X / ATIS Not AVBL for landing, except in case of an emergency. V3 MSA 108.750 52°19’56’’N 004°45’00’’E 0 RWY 36R: Y Y Do not cross red lights indicating displaced RWY end. V TWR-W No lights beyond displaced RWY end. VK 183 ft AMSL Section beyond displaced RWY end crosses RWY 09/27. VS THR ELEV -12 ft P7 V W1 VN C1 VE VS SCHIPHOL / ZWA THR ELEV GP -12 ft V4 CH32X 332.600 P6 52°19’43’’N 004°44’15’’E W2 D VS VL 0 C Y V PAPI LOC VPB 110.100 C2 W3 AMSTERDAM / AMS LOC 113.950 / CH86Y HIGHWAY ABA 111.950 52°19’58’’N 004°42’20’’E D C 0 W4 Y AZ 36R V CH 548 VM SCHIPHOL / BVB CH52Y 52°19’11’’N 004°47’31’’E HIGHWAY W5 FIRE E6 0 STATION C3 FIRE BRIGADE GP 1 332.750 PRACTICE GROUND PRECISION APPROACH CAUTION ! LIGHTING SYSTEM HIGHWAY TUNNEL THR ELEV (CAT III) -13 ft 3300 x 45 m D C Z 3573 x 300 m E6 1 DISPLACED THR 90 m 3453 x 45 m CAUTION ! ELEV -12 ft W6 RWY 09/27 PAPI N1 N9 N2 LOC N4 N3 E5 BVB 111.550 ENGINE RUN-UP N5 B SCHIPHOL / SCH AREA B E5 DISPLACED RWY END CH28Y B A13 E5 SIMPLE APPROACH B A16 A15 A14 575 m 52°18’48’’N 004°47’55’’E B A19 A18 A17 A P-holding B LIGHTING SYSTEM A20 A RWY 18C/36C A21 A 3420 x 300 m THR ELEV A A A16 A -14 ft A22 E4 E4 A17 A14 HANGAR 1 A19 E4 G1 E4 G2 GP X 331.250 G-PIER F-PIER A13 A20 G-apron GA Terminal E-PIER A12 A12 E3 HELISPOT HANGAR 2 E3 W7 E-apron HANGAR 3 B A A B NOT IN USE PAPI TAR SSR HN D-apron A11 K-apron J-apron G2 GK E2 TERMINAL A10 A10 VDF BEACON SCHIPHOL / MSA PAPI H-apron GL VDF CH24Y GA 118.100/118.400 52°18’32’’N 004°44’08’’E H-PIER A B 119.225/119.050 A24 G ARP 121.200/121.500 X 121.700/121.800 G3 52° 18’ 29’’ N D-PIER 131.150/133.100 GP 004° 45’ 51’’ E A9C A9 Z 330.350 HANGAR 4 HANGAR 32 B A TWR-C AZ 06 CH 590 W8 320 ft AMSL G4 A HANGAR 5 DISPLACED THR B LOC 450 m A8 C-PIER KAG 110.550 2014 x 45 m ELEV -12 ft A25 A7 A8 Compass deviations, caused A6 E1 by underground train may occur A5 HANGAR 14 A A7 3520 x 300m 2134 x G300 m B-Corridor 3400 x 45 m 1 Y-Apron A26 S7 G4 W12 A6 B CAUTION ! W9 B-PIER A A5 A4E S6 A4W A27 RAILWAY-TUNNEL FREIGHT I S5 THR ELEV B P5 A4 -12 ft RWY 04/22 PAPI G5 W10 W11 HANGAR 9 FREIGHT II & III A3 A Z A2D G B-apron B PAPI A2C A3 HANGAR 10 P4 G5 LOC Q A2B S4 M-apron ZWA 109.500 A2A FIRE RWY 18L/36R A A2 STATION A1 B THR ELEV VAR 0° E 2010 -13 ft Z1 ANNUAL RATE Z2 A G OF CHANGE 8’ E LOC SCH 109.150 B S3 FREIGHT V SIMPLE APPROACH 3500 x 45 m LIGHTING SYSTEM PRECISION APPROACH R HANGAR 11 LIGHTING SYSTEM HANGAR 12 (CAT III) FREIGHT VI 3620 x 300 m S2 X SCHIPHOL / ABA G FREIGHT VI R-apron S-apron CH56Y X SCALE 1 : 20 000 52°17’37’’N 004°46’30’’E metres 0 100 200 300 400 500 S2 0 PAPI HANGAR 73 feet 0 500 1000 1500 RWY 06/24 HIGHWAY FREIGHT VIII G NOTE : S1 GP 335.000 1 CAUTION: No entry E1 and N9 from TWY A and B. X No entry W6 from TWY A, B and D. PAPI EL 36R CH 548 THR ELEV LEGEND -11 ft X H24 FIXED STOP BAR DISPLACED THR 250 m ELEV -12 ft GP H24 SWITCHABLE STOP BAR EL 06 329.450 CH 590 PRECISION APPROACH LOW VISIBILITY PROCEDURES SWITCHABLE STOP BAR LIGHTING SYSTEM SCHIPHOL / KAG (CAT III) LOW VISIBILITY PROCEDURES FIXED STOP BAR CH42Y 52°17’22’’N 004°44’33’’E SWITCHABLE STOP BAR 0 ONLY IN USE IN CASE OF LANDING OR DEPARTING 18C/36C RWY HOLDING POSITION MARKING, PATTERN A PRECISION APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM (CAT III) RWY HOLDING POSITION MARKING, PATTERN B VM INTERMEDIATE HOLDING POSITION LIGHTED GK INTERMEDIATE HOLDING POSITION NON LIGHTED A3 TAXIWAY A3 RWY STRIP BLAST FENCE CROSSING VEHICLES X NOT IN USE CHANGE : PCN RWY 04/22 and weight restriction 09/27, editorial. © Air Traffic Control the Netherlands Topografische en technische ondergrond © Amsterdam Airport Schiphol AIRAC AMDT 01/12 SCHIPHOL RWY 04 - 22 AD 2.EHAM-AOC-04-22 AIP NETHERLANDS AERODROME OBSTACLE CHART TYPE A 10 APR 08 20 60 50 30 0 40 10 FURTHER NO 3900 OBSTACLES 22.37 8 METRES 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 0 50 50 9 150 100 8 3300 SCALE 1 : 2,000 7 FEET 9 7 26.68 20.94 3000 FEET METRES 2700 1.2% SLOPE SLOPE 1.2% 1.2% 5000 1500 7.69 2400 6 6 5 5 4000 0.55 2100 1000 -4.23 -4.23 . 0 -4.23 22 22 3000 222° 2000 SCALE 1 : 20,000 500 2014 2014 2074 2014 2014 x 45 RWY 22 1000 0 0 SURVEYING AGENCY : Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Data and ICT DATE OF SURVEY : AUG / SEP 2006 MEAN SEA LEVEL ASPHALT Take - Off Run Available Landing Distance Available Take - Off Distance Available Accelerate Stop Distance Available 1000 2074 2014 2014 2014 RWY 04 500 042° -3.98 -3.98 0 04 . -3.98 -3.79 1 1 2100 2 2 3 -2.02 3 -0.72 2400 2700 1.2% SLOPE 12.05 4 4 OBSTACLES OBSTACLES 3000 FURTHER NO NO FURTHER FURTHER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER TREE POLE, TOWER, SPIRE, ANTENNA, CHIMNEY BUILDING OR LARGE STRUCTURE TRAFFIC (IN PLAN) TRAFFIC (IN PROFILE) WINDMILL MAGNETIC VARIATION: 1°W - 2005 0 50 10 60 20 40 30 DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS IN METRES CHANGE: Due to new survey, editorial. © Air Traffic Control the Netherlands AIRAC AMDT 04/08 SCHIPHOL RWY 06 - 24 AD 2.EHAM-AOC-06-24 AIP NETHERLANDS AERODROME OBSTACLE CHART TYPE A 14 JAN 10 0 70 30 40 60 20 50 10 FURTHER NO 4160 OBSTACLES ELEV 103.14 10924m / 061° FROM THR 06 12 ELEV 37.28 5963m / 062° FROM THR 06 3860 11 1.2% SLOPE SLOPE 1.2% 1.2% 0 10 METRES 50 30 40 20 10 3560 0 50 50 -3.56 -3.56 -3.56 24 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol
    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)
    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Icao Definitions Flight Procedures Icao Rules Of
    22 AUG08 AIRTRAFFICCONTROL 1 INTRODUCTION This AirTrafficControlSectionisdesignedtoprovide pilots with InternationalCivil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards, Recommended Practicesand P rocedures forinternational operations.Inaddition, on astate-by-statebasis,flightproceduresuniquetoeachstate,ordifferent from thepublishedICAOrules andprocedures, areincluded. Each part of this AirTraffic ControlSection is describedbelow. ICAODEFINITIONS durespage.Ifthe state hasexceptions to thepub- Thesedefinitions areapplicable to theICAOinfor- lishedholding tables, acomplete tabulation of hold- mation contained in this ATCsection andhavebeen ing speeds is provided. extractedfromappropriateICAOpublications. PROCEDURE LIMITATIONS AND OPTIONS FLIGHT PROCEDURES Statementsconcerning conformance with ICAO Details of thePANS-OPS instrumentdepartureand PANS-OPS areincludedhere. The latestversion approach procedure informationusefultothe pilot-in- of PANS-OPS,VolumeIis provided in theICAO commandinthe execution of an instrument departure Flight Procedures chapter. Thestatement “Instru- or approach procedureare included. Theinformation ment Procedures areinconformancewith thenew is extractedfromthe latestamended edition of Pro- PANS-OPS Document8168,VolumeII” indicates ceduresfor AirNavigation Services—Aircraft Oper- compliance with this document. ations, Document 8168, VolumeI,FlightProcedures. Procedurelimitations, non-standard circling pro- References to earliereditionsare included. tectedarea, airspeedrestrictions, andsimilartype informationisincluded.Significantstatedifferences
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 ORDER of PRIORITY for AIRSPACE USE
    Appendix 2 ORDER OF PRIORITY FOR AIRSPACE USE The order of priority described in this Appendix is based on advance notification procedures at the pre-tactical level of ASM in adherence to the FUA concept. Approved Agencies (AA) are authorised to submit advance notifications to the AMC. Airspace reservations can also be made without an advance notification at the tactical level, but in that case the reserved areas will have no priority over other airspace structures or air traffic. This document specifies the permanent order of priority for airspace use. Traficom may issue a decision concerning temporary reorganisation of priorities through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. The following flights always take priority over all other air traffic and airspace structures: - an aircraft in an emergency; - an aircraft avoiding a weather phenomenon dangerous to flights; - quick reaction alert flights (QRA missions); - flights conducted under an Open Skies agreement; - flights designated with STS indicators MEDEVAC/SAR/HEAD. The following order of priority shall be observed between various airspace structures and air traffic: 1 TSA – TMA At the pre-tactical level, a TMA takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a TMA through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. At the tactical level, the TMA holder may release airspace for a TSA, in which case the TMZ requirement and services specific to the airspace class may also be waived. 2 TSA – FIZ At the pre-tactical level, the FIZ takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a FIZ through the strategic level planning and negotiation process.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 OKT. 2014 De Dorpsraden Onderwerp Aandacht Ringdijkbeleid
    gemeente Haarlemmermeer De leden van de gemeenteraad van Haarlemmermeer Postbus 250 2130 AG Hoofddorp Bezoekadres: Raadhuisplein 1 Hoofddorp Teletoon 0900 1852 Telefax 023 563 95 50 Cluster Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling Contactpersoon ir. Annemarie Lodder Doorkiesnummer 0900 1852 Uw brief Verzenddatum Ons kenmerk 14.078754\adv Bijlage(n) Brief van zeven dorpsraden: antwoordbrief College aan - 9 OKT. 2014 de dorpsraden Onderwerp Aandacht Ringdijkbeleid Geachte heer, mevrouw, In april 2014 hebben zeven dorpsraden aan de Ringdijk een brief aan het college gestuurd. De zeven dorpsraden zijn van Nieuwe Brug/ de Liede, Nieuwe Meer, Oude Meer, Rijsenhout, Vijfhuizen, Weteringbrug en Zwaanshoek. In deze brief uiten zij hun bezorgdheid over een aantal problemen van de Ringdijk. Zij constateren dat het Ringdijkbeleid en het Deltaplan Bereikbaarheid tot nu toe niet afdoende oplossingen hebben geboden voor de specifieke situatie en problemen op de Ringdijk. De onderwerpen die de dorpsraden noemen gaan over verkeersveiligheid, parkeren, verzakkingen, verrommeling van percelen aan de dijk, vervuiling achter de dijk en de verkoop van kades door het Hoogheemraadschap van Rijnland. Ook vinden ze dat ze in het verleden onvoldoende betrokken bent geweest bij de inrichting van de Ringdijk wat heeft geleid tot oplossingen en situaties waar de bewoners en (fietsende) gebruikers aan de Ringdijk niet gelukkig mee zijn. Uit deze opsomming blijkt al dat het een complex probleem is. Bovendien zijn er twee belangrijke andere overheden bij betrokken, namelijk het Hoogheemraadschap van Rijnland, als eigenaar en beheerder van de waterkering en het boezemwater, en de provincie Noord- Holland, als vaarwegbeheerder van de Ringvaart. Wij willen deze complexe problematiek aanpakken en een stap verder brengen.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Airspace Classifications
    United States Main article: Airspace class (United States) The U.S. adopted a slightly modified version of the ICAO system on September 16 , 1993 , when regions of airspace designated according to older classifications were converted wholesale. The exceptions are some Terminal Radar Service Areas (TRSA), which have special rules and still exist in a few places. • With some exceptions, Class A airspace is applied to all airspace between 18,000 feet(5,500 m) and Flight Level 600 (approximately 60,000 ft). Above FL600, the airspace reverts to Class E (Reference Order 7400.9P, Subpart E). The transition altitude (see Flight level ) is also consistently 18,000 feet (5,500 m). All operations in US Class A airspace must be conducted under IFR. SVFR flight in Class A airspace is prohibited. • Class B airspace is used around major airports , in a funnel shape that is designed to contain arriving and departing commercial air traffic operating under IFR, up to10,000 feet (3,000 m) above MSL (12,000 feet above Denver, Colorado ). Class C airspace is used around airports and military air bases with a moderate traffic level. Class • Class D is used for smaller airports that have a control tower. The U.S. uses a modified version of the ICAO class C and D airspace, where only radio contact with ATC rather than an ATC clearance is required for VFR operations. • Other controlled airspace is designated as Class E - this includes a large part of the lower airspace. Class E airspace exists in many forms. It can serve as a surface-based extension to Class D airspace to accommodate IFR approach/departure procedure areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to VFR Pilots Information to VFR Pilots
    Information to VFR pilots Information to VFR pilots This publication has been prepared by Airspace Class G Airspace Class D Naviair with the purpose of focusing In general, the airspace in Denmark, All CTRs and some TMAs in Denmark, on flight safety and clarifies topics, outside CTRs and TMAs, is Airspace e.g. Aarhus, Rønne, Aalborg, Karup which are important to know for VFR Class G from GND to 3500 feet. and Skrydstrup are Airspace Class D. pilots, to prevent airspace penetration Both IFR and VFR traffic are permitted. of controlled airspace. Over the North Sea it is Airspace Class G from GND to FL195. Airspace Class D is controlled airspace and ATC Clearance is required. Airspace Classes Both IFR and VFR traffic are permitted. Airspace Class G is uncontrolled VFR traffic receives traffic information In Denmark the airspace below FL195 airspace and therefore both IFR and about other traffic, IFR included. is divided into four different airspace VFR traffic only receive FIS, includ- classes, namely Airspace Class C, D, E ing traffic information about other There is no requirement for transpon- and G, with Airspace Class C being the known traffic. der, but two-way radio communicati- most restrictive airspace and Airspace on is required. Class G the least restrictive. There is no requirement for two-way radio communication or transponder for VFR flights. Note however, that Airspace Class C when flying in TIZs and TIAs two-way Billund TMA and Copenhagen Area, radio communication is mandatory, which consists of Roskilde and Ka- even though they are Airspace Class G.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA
    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontwerp Structuurvisie Amsterdam 2040 Economisch Sterk En Duurzaam
    Ontwerp Structuurvisie Amsterdam 2040 Economisch Sterk en Duurzaam Deel 1 De Visie Inhoudsopgave Inhoud Hoofdstuk 1 De Context: De positie van Amsterdam 11 Hoofdstuk 2 De Visie: Amsterdam Economisch sterk en Duurzaam 17 Hoofdstuk 3 Uitrol centrumgebied 33 3.1 Nieuwe hoogstedelijke gebieden 36 3.2 Stadstraten en –pleinen 37 3.3 Auto en de stad 39 3.4 Verbetering stedelijk OV-net en uitbreiding Parkeer+Reisfaciliteiten 40 3.5 Hoogbouw en Uitrol centrumgebied 41 3.6 Ondergrond en Uitrol Centrumgebied 42 Hoofdstuk 4 Verweving Metropolitane landschap en stad 45 4.1 Groene Scheggen en de stelling van Amsterdam 48 4.2 Koppen van de scheggen 51 4.3 De randen van de scheggen 52 4.4 Verbindende fietsroutes: fietsnet stad gekoppeld aan fietsnet naar buiten 53 4.5 OV-ontsluiting van de groene scheggen 53 4.6 Hoogbouw en het metropolitane landschap 54 4.7 Ondergrond en het metropolitane landschap 55 Hoofdstuk 5 Herontdekking van het Waterfront: Het IJ centraal 57 5.1 De Amsterdamse Haven 60 5.2 Verkeer en vervoer en het Waterfront 62 5.3 Westelijke IJ-oevers, Zaan- en IJ-oevers verbonden 63 5.4 Mogelijke Olympische locatie 66 5.5 Oostelijke IJ-oevers 67 5.6 IJmeer en IJburg 68 5.7 Hoogbouw langs het IJ 70 5.8 Ondergrond en het waterfront 71 Hoofdstuk 6 Internationalisering van de Zuidflank 73 6.1 De Zuidas 76 6.2 Nieuwe Meer: meerdere scenario’s, Olympische locatie 77 6.3 Schiphol 78 6.4 Amsterdam Zuidoost 79 6.5 Hoogbouw op de Zuidflank 81 6.6 Ondergrond en de Zuidflank 81 6.7 De best bereikbare locatie van Nederland 82 Visie en beleid 85 2 Ontwerp
    [Show full text]
  • STS UAS Operations Within Close Proximity and Above an Object
    Standard Scenario (STS) UAS OPERATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY AND ABOVE AN OBJECT WITHIN AND OVER CONGESTED AREAS Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport - CAA The Netherlands Version 1.4 - December 2018 Table of contents Introduction 3 Glossary of Terms 4 ConOps; introduction 8 Conops; General Conditions 9 Operator Requirements 11 General 11 Operations Manual and Procedures 15 Crew Qualification 20 Other specifics 21 Application for Authorization 22 STS-CAA-NL-CLOSEPROX-V1.4 !2 Introduction In order to avoid time consuming appraisals of repetitive individual approvals, CAA-NL applies the methodology to define “Standard Scenarios” for a growing number of identified types of ConOps with known threats and acceptable risk mitigations. Standard Scenarios limit the administrative burden for both UAS operators and the authorities and stimulates innovation by lowering the entry level for certain types of operation. A standard scenario includes a declaration that shall be signed by the operator’s accountable manager and submitted to the authorities. By submitting the declaration the operator indicates the covered operation will be conducted in accordance with the indicated general conditions and that all mitigation measures are in place and verified. This methodology is in line with all known elements of upcoming EU drone legislation. Some underlying elements of this legislation and associated guidance material are still under construction. Therefore, until further notice, all operators wishing to conduct the operation covered by this standard scenario in The Netherlands, also need to obtain the specific approval of CAA-NL by applying for extension of the privileges under their RPAS Operators Certificate (ROC). Dutch ROC-holders may send their applications for authorisations to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D National Airspace System
    APPENDIX D NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport Airport Master Plan Update APPENDIX D. NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM The national airspace system consists of a network of navigational aids and a number of air traffic control facilities designed to operate in conjunction with the various defined classes of airspace. These classes are subdivided into controlled, uncontrolled, special use, and other airspace categories. D.1 CONTROLLED AIRSPACE Controlled airspace includes all airspace categorized as either Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace. While operating in controlled airspace pilots are subject to certain operating rules as well as pilot qualification and aircraft equipment requirements. In accordance with each airspace classification, ATC service is provided to aircraft operating under instrument flight rules (IFR) and visual flight rules (VFR). D.1.1 Class A Airspace Class A airspace includes the airspace over the United States and the airspace overlying the waters within 12 nautical miles of the coast of the 48 contiguous states, from 18,000 feet mean sea level (MSL) up to and including 60,000 feet MSL, also known as flight level 600 (FL600). Appendix D D - 1 Final Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport Airport Master Plan Update The Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) requires all persons operating an aircraft in Class A airspace to be flying under IFR. Operations in Class A airspace can only be conducted under an air traffic control (ATC) clearance received prior to entering the airspace and each aircraft must be equipped with a two-way radio capable of communicating with ATC on an assigned frequency and an operating transponder.
    [Show full text]