Weed Management in Organic Vegetable Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weed Management in Organic Vegetable Production A3845 Weed management in organic vegetable production A PRACTICAL REVIEW OF APPLIED RESEARCH JED COLQUHOUN University of Wisconsin-Extension I Cooperative Extension Contents Foreword . 1 Problem avoidance: Preventive strategies . 2 Managing the weed seedbank . 4 Weed suppression with mulches . 6 Cover crops and allelopathy . 8 Reduced tillage and dark cultivation . 10 Thermal weed management . 12 Alternative herbicides . 14 Crop competition for weed control . 16 In-season cultivation . 18 Integrated weed management . 21 Foreword he intention of this manual is to Few things are harder to put provide an objective analysis of Torganic weed management up with than the annoyance strategies. One that is based on peer- reviewed and published applied of a good example. research. The strategies used in organic weed control have been Mark Twain around, in most cases, for centuries, and therefore current peer-reviewed research is often not discussed when weighing management options. With this in mind, the research is first objec - tively summarized for those who are interested in“just the facts,” the back - ground information is presented in more detail, and finally the research that serves as the basis for the sum - mary is reviewed. The strategies approved for use in organic production by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Organic Program, local organic grower organizations, and end-users change periodically. Consult the appropriate organizations for approved strategies and products prior to any use, as well as labels and registration status for products used as herbicides. How to use this manual: I Interested in just the facts? Focus on the key points and background information for practical guidance and an overview of weed manage - ment options. I Interested in the details and eval - uation of options? Consider also reading the research sections for an overview of recent peer-reviewed studies conducted on vegetables. 1 KEY POINTS WEED MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC VEGETABLE PRODUCTION I It’s often easier to prevent the introduction of a new weed species than to eradi - Problem avoidance: cate it once established. Preventive strategies I Consider potential sources y far, the best management strat - should be cleaned of soil and vegeta - of new weeds—as contami - egy for any weed is to prevent tion before being moved between nants in crop seed, manure, Bintroduction and dispersal. There fields. are several routes for weed introduc - Historically, many weed species have or mulches; on equipment; tion, and the majority involve inadver - been introduced as a seed contami - and in open irrigation tent grower actions. Potential sources of weed seed on the farm include nant in crop seed. This source of water. compost, manure, mulches such as weeds is particularly prevalent when straw, equipment, open irrigation “saved” seed is replanted in the follow - I Continue to manage weeds water, and contaminants in crop seed ing year or on another farm without after harvest and in field and transplant containers. cleaning or analysis by a seed certifi - cation agency. margins to minimize weed Occasionally, new invasive weeds are intentionally planted, as is the case seed production through Prevention is also important in mini - with kudzu, which was first marketed mizing the spread of weed species mowing or planting of for forage and erosion control in the already found on the farm. competitive, non-invasive southeastern United States, and vel - Management practices that minimize vetleaf, which was initially cultivated species in boundary strips. weed seed production are important as a source of fiber for cloth and rope. in fields after crop harvest and in sur - Consider all potential entry routes for rounding field margins, such as: new weed species and methods to I Till or mow after crop harvest but reduce weed seed and vegetative before weeds go to seed. propagule introduction and viability. I Identify weeds prior to using tillage Weed seed in compost, for example, for weed management—perennial can often be destroyed by prolonged species can be spread by cutting heat and adequate moisture in the below-ground vegetative tissue, pile. Some weed seeds such as curly such as rhizomes and roots. dock can pass through the digestive tracts of cows and other farm animals. I In field margins, consider planting and managing a boundary strip Consider the source of all compost, that is kept free of weed seed pro - manure, and straw, and question duction. The planted species could providers about weed contamination include a mix of those that are com - prior to purchasing. For example, was petitive with weeds and support a hay field weedy, and if so, when was beneficial wildlife or predators of the field harvested relative to weed other agricultural pests. Field mar - flowering? Were perennial weeds gin plantings might also be har - present that could be dispersed vested for hay. through root cuttings? Cultivators, I Prevent weed seed production harvesters, and other field equipment along irrigation canals, reservoirs, are sources of vegetative root tissue and other open water sources. and seed for many weed species and 2 PROBLEM AVOIDANCE: PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES Research Open irrigation water Planted field margin boundary as a source of weed seed strips for weed control Manure composting to Source: Catalan, B., J. Aibar, and C. Source: West, T. M., E. J. P. Marshall, and reduce weed seed viability Zaragoza. 1997. Weed seed dispersal G. M. Arnold. 1997. Can sown field Source: Tompkins, D. K., D. Chaw, and through irrigation channels. Proc. boundary strips reduce the ingress of A. T. Abiola. 1998. Effect of windrow 1997 Congress Spanish Weed Science aggressive field margin weeds? Proc. composting on weed seed germina - Society, pp. 187 –193. Brighton Crop Protection Conference, tion and viability. Compost Science and pp. 985-990. Utilization 6:30–34. Summary: Irrigation channels were sampled at three depths and weed Summary: Boundary strips planted Summary: Manure was composted in seed germination was tested in con - with grass and wildflower seed mix - a windrow with a core temperature of trolled conditions. Seed from 23 fami - tures were compared to unplanted 130°–150°F. After 2 weeks of compost - lies and 63 species germinated, strips surrounding agricultural fields. ing, the high temperatures killed primarily from the Asteraceae and The planted strips limited movement 100% of the seed of green foxtail, Poaceae families. Common species of weeds including Canada thistle, catchweed bedstraw, kochia, wild included Conyza spp., annual sowthis - catchweed bedstraw, poverty brome, buckwheat, field pennycress, and tle, smooth pigweed, Bromus spp., and and quackgrass into the fields. pineappleweed, and all but 3.5% of annual bluegrass. the seed of redroot pigweed. No seeds survived after 4 weeks of composting. This study demonstrated the effective - ness of even short periods of com - posting at eliminating the distribution Table 1. Germination of selected of viable weed seeds. weed species after 17 years of burial in Nebraska. Weed seed longevity Species Germination, % Source: Burnside, O. C., R. G. Wilson, Annual grasses S. Weisberg, and K. G. Hubbard. 1996. Barnyardgrass 0 Seed longevity of 41 weed species Green foxtail 0 buried 17 years in eastern and west - Longspine sandbur 0 ern Nebraska. Weed Science 44:74–86. Yellow foxtail 0 Summary: This study examined the Annual broadleaves long-term survival of weed seeds and Common lambsquarters 7 reveals the importance of preventing Hairy nightshade 65 weeds from becoming established. Jimsonweed 90 Weed seeds were buried and then Redroot pigweed 1 dug up and tested annually to see if Velvetleaf 35 they would germinate. Following Biennial/perennial weeds 17 years of deep burial without tillage, Canada thistle 7 seed of 4% of annual grasses, 11% of Common mullein 95 annual broadleaf weeds, 30% of bien - Curly dock 61 nial weeds, and 8% of perennial weeds Dandelion 0 MAKING THE CASE germinated (table 1). Common Source: Adapted from Burnside et al. mullein proved to have superior 1996. FOR PREVENTION : longevity, with 95% of the seed germi - After 17 years underground, nating at the end of the study. 95% of the seeds of common 3 mullein still germinated. KEY POINTS WEED MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC VEGETABLE PRODUCTION I The soil contains a seed - bank—a vast supply of weed seeds—of potential Managing the weed seedbank future weed problems. he soil contains millions of weed additional tillage into a seedbed that seeds and serves as a seedbank or has been depleted of germinable I Two techniques for Treservoir for future weed infesta - weeds. This technique is particularly depleting weed seeds: tions. Many of these seeds are dor - useful with small-seeded or slow- mant, and will not germinate until growing crops that are not very com - Stale seedbed technique, triggered by environmental or physio - petitive with weeds, such as onions where soil is tilled 20 to logical signals. Although seeds can and carrots. remain dormant for several years, The second technique, , 30 days before crop plant - weed pressure during the cropping solarization uses sheets of clear plastic mulch to ing. Weeds that germinate season can be reduced through prac - cover the soil and trap solar energy tices that deplete those seeds that will during the delay period are near the soil surface. Intense heat and readily germinate before crop planting . killed shortly before seed - sunlight are required for effective There are two techniques for deplet - solarization, thus limiting the use of ing using flaming, mowing, ing weed seeds. In the first, known as this strategy in more temperate pro - or shallow tillage. the stale seedbed technique, the duction areas. Moist soil conducts seedbed is tilled and prepared for heat better than dry soil and promotes Solarization is the practice crop planting, then allowed to rest microbial activity. After about 4 weeks of covering soil with plastic while non-dormant weeds germinate of solarization, the plastic mulch is and emerge.
Recommended publications
  • EFFICACY of ORGANIC WEED CONTROL METHODS Scott Snell, Natural Resources Specialist
    FINAL STUDY REPORT (Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House, NJ) EFFICACY OF ORGANIC WEED CONTROL METHODS Scott Snell, Natural Resources Specialist ABSTRACT Organic weed control methods have varying degrees of effectiveness and cover a broad range of costs financially and in time. Studies were conducted at the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House, New Jersey to examine the efficacy and costs of a variety of organic weed control methods: tillage, organic herbicide (acetic acid), flame treatment, solarization, and use of a smother cover crop. The smother cover and organic herbicide treatment plots displayed the least efficacy to control weeds with the average percent weed coverage of each method being over 97%. The organic herbicide plots also had the greatest financial costs and required the second most treatment time following the flame treatment plots. Although the flame treatment method was time consuming, it was effective resulting in an average of 12.14% weed coverage. Solarization required below average treatment time and resulted in an average of 49.22% weed coverage. The tillage method was found to be the most effective means of control and also had well below average financial costs and required slightly above average treatment time. INTRODUCTION The final results of the third biennial national Organic Farming Research Foundation’s (OFRF) survey found that organic producers rank weed control as one of the top problems negatively affecting their farms’ profitability (1999). Weed control options available for organic producers are far more limited than those of conventional production due to organic certification standards.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCIPLES of ORGANIC FARMING SIXTH SEMESTER Polytechnic In
    A LECTURE NOTE ON Agron. 6.10 (1 + 1 = 2) PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIC FARMING SIXTH SEMESTER Polytechnic in Agriculture College of Agriculture, NAU, Bharuch Agron. 6.10 (1 + 1 = 2) Principles of Organic Farming Theory: Chapter Chapter Page No. No. 1. ORGANIC FARMING-AN INTRODUCTION 2. PRINCIPLES, SCOPE AND COMPONENTS OF ORGANIC FARMING 3. COMPONENTS OF ORGANIC FARMING AND THEIR ROLE IN SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION 4. INITIATIVES FOR PROMOTING ORGANIC FARMING 5. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC FARMING 6. DISEASE AND PEST MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC FARMING 7. WEED MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC FARMING 8. OPERATIONAL STRUCTURE OF NPOP AND NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ORGANIC FARMING 9. CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION PROCESS OF ORGANIC PRODUCT 10. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS, MARKETING AND EXPORT POTENTIAL OF ORGANIC FARMING Reference books 1. Organic farming-Theory and Practice by S.P. Palaniappan and K. Annadurai 2. Principles of organic farming by S. R. Reddy 3. Principles of Agronomy by S. R. Reddy 4. Organic crop production (Principles and practices Vol-I: Principles and General Aspects) by J. P. Sharma 5. Principles and practices of organic farming by R. Balasubramanian, K. Balakrishnan and K. Sivasubramanian CHAPTER -1 INTRODUCTION, DEFINITION, CONCEPT, IMPORTANCE, ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, OBJECTIVES, ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIC FARMING 1.1 Introduction: Green revolution technologies such as greater use of synthetic agro chemicals like fertilizers and pesticides, adoption of nutrient responsive, high-yielding varieties of crops, greater exploitation of irrigation potentials etc… has boosted the production out put in most of cases. Without proper choice and continues use of these high energy inputs is leading to decline in production and productivity of various crops as well as deterioration of soil health and environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Intercropping Pattern in Reducing Weeds Infestation in Okra, Maize and Pepper Intercrop
    International Journal of Weed Science and Technology ISSN 4825-3499 Vol. 2 (1), pp. 063-069, January, 2018. Available online at www.advancedscholarsjournals.org © Advanced Scholars Journals Full Length Research Paper Efficacy of intercropping pattern in reducing weeds infestation in okra, maize and pepper intercrop *Ubini C. Thomas, Jaymiwhie Obanna and Ikogho B. Patrick Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, P. M. B 5323 Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Accepted 15 January, 2018 Field study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of intercropping pattern in reducing weed infestation in okra, maize and pepper intercrop; at the teaching and research farm of Rivers State University of Science and Technology Port Harcourt, Nigeria during 2009 and 2010 cropping season. Three intercropping pattern namely; alternate row intercropping, strip row intercropping and mixed intercropping were compared to sole cropping in a randomized complete block design replicated three times. The result reveal that weed biomass were significantly lower in both years in all forms of intercropping pattern compared to sole cropping or mono-cropping. Weed smothering efficiency in both years showed that mixed pattern (45.7%) >alternate row pattern (33.4%) > strip row pattern (11.5%). Crop yield were better in an intercrop system for maize and pepper in both years compared to -1 sole crop. However, mean okra fruit yield was highest in sole cropping (3253 kg ha ) when compared -1 to intercropping pattern. Maize yield was highest in mixed pattern (8,987 kg ha ) and lowest in sole -1 -1 cropping (6,955 kg ha ) while pepper fruit yield was highest in strip row pattern (5,435 kg ha ) and -1 lowest in mixed pattern (1,562 kg ha ).
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Sustainable Weed Able Weed
    PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE WEED MANAGEMENT FOR CROPLANDS AGRONOMY SYSTEMS SERIES Abstract: To some extent, weeds are a result of crop production, but to a larger extent they are a consequence of management decisions. Managing croplands according to nature’s principles will reduce weed problems. And while these principles apply to most crops, this publication focuses on agronomic crops such as corn, soybeans, milo, and small grains. The opportunities to address the root causes of weeds are not always readily apparent, and often require some imagination to recognize. Creativity is key to taking advantage of these opportunities and devising sustainable cropping systems that prevent weed problems, rather than using quick-fix approaches. Annual monoculture crop production generally involves tillage that creates conditions hospitable to many weeds. This publication discusses several alternatives to conventional tillage systems, including allelopathy, intercropping, crop rotations, and a weed- free cropping design. A Resources list provides sources of further information. By Preston Sullivan boundaries within which we operate and the NCAT Agriculture Specialist rules for success within those boundaries. September 2003 The “weed control” paradigm is reactive— it addresses weed First, Free Your Brain problems by using As Iowa farmer Tom Frantzen poetically states: various tools and tech- “Free your brain and your behind will follow.” nologies. “How am I What Tom is referring to is discovering new para- gonna get rid of this vel- digms. Joel Barker, author of Paradigms—The vet-leaf?” and “How do Business of Discovering the Future (1), defines a I control foxtail?” are re- paradigm as a set of standards that establish the active statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaponicstheeasywaysample
    HOW TO DO AQUAPONICS THE EASY Way A Step-by-Step, Affordable DIY Guide to the Most Efficient Food Production System in the History of Mankind If You Have Light and Heat You Can Have Plants and Fish! SUSANNE FRIEND & TIM MANN HOW TO DO AQUAPONICS THE EASY WAY! First Edition, December 2013 ©Susanne Friend, Tim Mann, and Friendly Aquaponics, Inc, 2013. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, or transmitted in any form without express written permission from the publisher (Friendly Aquaponics, Inc.), except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in a review; nor may any part of this book be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other, without express written permission from both the authors and publisher. Cover design, all document layout, design, and artwork ©Susanne Friend, 2013 This is designed to be an E-book, and is meant to be read on a mobile device or e-reader, and not printed at all, this saves TONS of paper! If you really need to print it, print it off your printer, but make sure to print only the pages you really need to print! Mahalo Nui Loa “Great thanks, Everlasting” To The People We Call “Farmily” First and foremost, thank you to Dr. James Rakocy, for his seminal work at the University of the Virgin Islands, and for hosting the 2007 Short Course that started us on this path. Along the way have been many excellent students who asked a critical question at just the right moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming As a Method of Weed Control in Organic Farming Systems Dale R
    Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-3038 • New • January 2008 Flaming as a Method of Weed Control in Organic Farming Systems Dale R. Mutch, Extension Specialist, Michigan State University Simon A. Thalmann, Research Assistant, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Todd E. Martin, Research Assistant, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Dean G. Baas, Graduate Assistant, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Introduction Some farmers have found that flaming Using fire to control controls certain weeds weeds in organic farming (lambsquarters and systems shows promise for pigweed, for example) reducing weed populations better than others without herbicides. A (mustards or common carefully directed flame ragweed) (Mutch et al., fueled by natural gas or liquid propane (LP) 2005). Flaming is more effective in a crop such as increases the temperature within the weed, causing corn, where the growing point is below the soil cells to rupture and effectively killing weeds surface, than in crops such as soybeans, where the while doing little damage to the crop (Fig. 1). growing point is aboveground. The authors of this Flaming disrupts weed growth through heat, so bulletin do not recommend using flaming to control it is important to flame when the plants are dry weeds in soybeans. and wind speed and direction are favorable. Both moisture and wind can lower the heat from the Exposing a weed seedling to flame for 1/10 of flame, reducing the effectiveness of the flaming a second (Row Crop, 2007) is usually enough to application (Mutch et al., 2005). ensure control, although this may vary with weed type and size (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Permaculture Cairns Newsletter
    Permaculture Cairns Inc. Established July, 2007 Web site: www.permaculturecairns.org.au Permaculture Cairns News Empowering communities with sustainable solutions Care for the Earth, Care for people, Share the excess Care of the Earth, Care of People, Share the excess _________________________________________________________________________________ November Public Info & General Meeting Night th Tuesday 19 6:30pm for 7pm start. Flexible Learning Centre, 90 Clarke Street, Manunda Clarke Street comes off Hoare on the Salvos Corner. There is wheel chair access. If you can spare the time, come early (6.15) to help us set up tables and chairs. Members please bring a plate of food to share for dinner, or make a small donation towards the refreshment costs. OOH! and bring a friend, all welcome but ! Financial Members are free. Un- financial members and non members pay $5 for the info night and dinner SPEAKERS for the month: Steve Bailey from Terrain Natural Resource Management will be our November Guest Speaker. Steve has recently been involved on a broad range of catchment issues with a wide variety of stakeholder groups. Some examples of relevant projects: Prioritisation of cactchment repair programs Strategic targeting of weed control Trials of new erosion control measures in riparian areas Revegetation of degraded sites for habitat connectivity – working with local Landcare groups. Building constructed wetlands as nutrient and sediment sinks on farm lands. Water quality monitoring – in particular looking at pesticide/herbicide runoff. Working with primary producers to help transition a move away from some conventional farming methods and adopting alternative practices where possible. LAST MONTHS’ GUEST SPEAKER Jaide from King Brown Technologies, the makers of King Brown Compost was our guest speaker at the last meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Weed Control Using Automated Weed and Crop Classification Xiaolong Wu, Stéphanie Aravecchia, Philipp Lottes, Cyrill Stachniss, Cédric Pradalier
    Robotic weed control using automated weed and crop classification Xiaolong Wu, Stéphanie Aravecchia, Philipp Lottes, Cyrill Stachniss, Cédric Pradalier To cite this version: Xiaolong Wu, Stéphanie Aravecchia, Philipp Lottes, Cyrill Stachniss, Cédric Pradalier. Robotic weed control using automated weed and crop classification. 2020. hal-02484462 HAL Id: hal-02484462 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02484462 Preprint submitted on 19 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Robotic Weed Control Using Automated Weed and Crop Classification Xiaolong Wu Stephanie´ Aravecchia Georgia Institute of Technology UMI2958 GeorgiaTech-CNRS Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Metz 57070, France Atlanta, GA 30332, United States [email protected] [email protected] Philipp Lottes Cyrill Stachniss University of Bonn University of Bonn Department of Photogrammetry Department of Photogrammetry Bonn 53115, Germany Bonn 53115, Germany [email protected] [email protected] Cedric´ Pradalier UMI2958 GeorgiaTech-CNRS Metz 57070, France [email protected] Abstract Autonomous robotic weeding systems in precision farming have demonstrated their full potential to alleviate the current dependency on agrochemicals such as herbicides and pesticides, thus reducing environmental pollution and improving sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • To Consumers' Perceptions of Aquaponics Products In
    Article Commercial Aquaponics Approaching the European Market: To Consumers’ Perceptions of Aquaponics Products in Europe Vesna Miličić 1,*, Ragnheidur Thorarinsdottir 2, Maria Dos Santos 3 and Maja Turnšek Hančič 4 1 Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 University of Iceland, Hjardarhaga 2-6, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland; [email protected] 3 DINAMIA’CET—ISCTE–IUL, ESCS—IPL, Av. das Forcas Armadas, Edificio, ISCTE, Sala 2W4-d, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Tourism, University of Maribor, Cesta prvih borcev 36, SI-8250 Brežice, Slovenia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editor: M. Haïssam Jijakli Received: 1 October 2016; Accepted: 16 January 2017; Published: 31 January 2017 Abstract: The first commercial aquaponics companies are starting up in Europe. The main focus has been on solving technology issues and optimizing production. However, increasing attention is now being paid to certification and regulations linked to aquaponics, as well as the marketing of products and services. The paper presents the results of a study whose main aim was to estimate consumers’ knowledge about aquaponics and their acceptance of aquaponics products in different European regions. An on-line questionnaire was administered to the general public through the aquaponics network of Food and Agriculture COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action FA1305 “The EU Aquaponics Hub—Realising Sustainable Integrated Fish and Vegetable Production for the EU” in 16 European countries. The methodology includes univariate and multivariate statistical techniques. The results show that, on average, attitudes towards aquaponics were positive, showing no significant differences between those who already knew about aquaponics and those who only heard about it through the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Robotic Weed Control Systems: a Review
    computers and electronics in agriculture 61 (2008) 63–78 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compag Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review D.C. Slaughter ∗, D.K. Giles, D. Downey University of California, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Davis, CA 95616, United States article info abstract Article history: Autonomous robotic weed control systems hold promise toward the automation of one of Received in revised form agriculture’s few remaining unmechanized and drudging tasks, hand weed control. Robotic 22 March 2007 technology may also provide a means of reducing agriculture’s current dependency on her- Accepted 2 May 2007 bicides, improving its sustainability and reducing its environmental impact. This review describes the current status of the four core technologies (guidance, detection and identifica- Keywords: tion, precision in-row weed control, and mapping) required for the successful development Robot of a general-purpose robotic system for weed control. Of the four, detection and identifica- Weed recognition tion of weeds under the wide range of conditions common to agricultural fields remains the Machine vision greatest challenge. A few complete robotic weed control systems have demonstrated the Geospatial technology potential of the technology in the field. Additional research and development is needed to Pest management fully realize this potential. Precision agriculture © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction ranth (Amaranthus spinosus L.) in lettuce fields reduced head weight and quality. Hodgson (1968) found that two Canada 1.1. Importance of weed control in crop production thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.) shoots/m2 reduced wheat yields by 15%.
    [Show full text]
  • Brush and Weed Control in Pasture and Rangeland Doug Shoup, Southeast Area Crops and Soils Specialist Kansas State University Research and Extension
    Brush and Weed Control in Pasture and Rangeland Doug Shoup, Southeast Area Crops and Soils Specialist Kansas State University Research and Extension Rangeland, pasture, and hay meadows are often a diverse mix of both desirable and undesirable plant species. The definition of desirable is up to the owner or operator of the land. Whether a plant is considered a weed or not is often subjective and thus defined as a “plant out of place”. Although an integrated weed management approach (utilizing multiple methods of weed and brush control) should be taken to control or suppress any weed population, chemical weed control is often the most common method. All persons using pesticides must read and follow all label directions before use. The user of the pesticide is responsible for all instructions contained within the label. For additional information visit your local county Extension office. Livestock Utilization. The common notion of the perfect forage for livestock being strictly grass is often short-sided and misunderstood. The fact is many broadleaf species are nutritious and highly sought after by livestock commonly produced in Kansas. Cattle in a native range may consume greater than 20% of their diet as palatable forbs (a herbaceous flowering plant other than grass) if available for grazing. In fact, many of the forb species are higher in quality than common forage grasses, especially later in the season when grass quality begins to decline. Other livestock such as sheep and goats consume a diet of plants considerably different than cattle. Sheep may consume greater than 50% of their diet as forbs while goats may consume most of their diet as plants other than grass.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois
    Pub# WS16 / Bulletin 789 / IL15 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Tables Table 1. Weed Response to “Burndown” Herbicides .............................................................................................19 Table 2. Application Intervals for Early Preplant Herbicides ............................................................................... 20 Table 3. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ....................................30 WEED Table 4. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ....................31 Table 5. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ...................................................32 Table 6. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ..................................33 2015 CONTROL Table 7. Grazing and Forage (Silage, Hay, etc.) Intervals for Herbicide-Treated Corn ................................. 66 OHIO, INDIANA Table 8. Rainfast Intervals, Spray Additives, and Maximum Crop Size for Postemergence Corn Herbicides .........................................................................................................................................................68 AND ILLINOIS Table 9. Herbicides Labeled for Use on Field Corn, Seed Corn, Popcorn, and Sweet Corn ..................... 69 GUIDE Table 10. Herbicide and Soil Insecticide Use Precautions ......................................................................................71 Table 11. Weed Response to Herbicides in Popcorn and Sweet Corn—Grasses
    [Show full text]