Wood Chip Mulch: Landscape Boon Or Bane?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wood Chip Mulch: Landscape Boon Or Bane? miracle, myth…or marketing Wood chip mulch: Landscape boon or bane? andscape mulches are increasingly An exhaustive review of the science recognized as pivotal components of behind landscape mulches is beyond environmentallyL sustainable gardens and the scope of this column (though I green spaces. Select the right mulch and have just completed such a review for Linda Chalker-Scott, Ph.D. you reap the benefits of healthier soils and upcoming publication in a scientific MasterGardener WSU editor plants. Choose the wrong mulch and the journal). Instead, I’m going to address Extension Urban Horticulturist only plants that thrive are the weeds. the documented benefits and drawbacks and Associate Professor, Before selecting a landscape mulch behind the use of arborist wood chips as a Puyallup Research and Extension Center, material, it’s important to reflect landscape mulch. Washington State University on the purpose of the landscape in Puyallup, Washington question. For instance, production Perfect choice agriculture generally requires short In areas where trees are a dominant term, intensive management of a crop, feature of the landscape, arborist wood while the philosophy behind landscape chips represent one of the best mulch horticulture is the long term, sustainable choices for trees and shrubs. A 1990 management of a system. Therefore, study evaluated the landscape mulch those mulches that work best for crop potential of 15 organic materials, production (including vegetable gardens) including grass clippings, leaves, are often not the best choices for woody composts, yard wastes, bark, and wood ornamental landscapes, and vice versa. chips. Wood chips were one of the best performers in terms of moisture Direct benefits retention, temperature moderation, weed The potential,direct benefits of any control, and sustainability. In many landscape mulch material can be grouped urban areas, arborist wood chips are Interested in into four general categories: available for free, representing one of the field trial research? Soil benefits most economically practical choices. Is your local Master Gardener program • improve structure Unlike the uniform nature of interested in conducting field trials • enhance gas transfer sawdust and bark mulches, wood chips on gardening products? Occasionally, • enhance water infiltration and include bark, wood, and often leaves. companies will contact Dr. Chalker-Scott with requests for product testing. retention The chemical and physical diversity Interested groups will receive basic training • prevent erosion and compaction of these materials resists the tendency in designing and conducting experimental • moderate temperature towards compaction seen in sawdust and field trials; local programs will need to Plant benefits bark. Additionally, the materials vary provide all materials and field space. • If interested, please email Dr. Chalker-Scott provide nutrients in their size and decomposition rate, at [email protected].. System benefits creating a more diverse environment that • suppress pathogens and pests is subsequently colonized by a diverse • enhance beneficial organisms soil biota. A biologically diverse soil MORE INFORMATION • increase biodiversity biota is more resistant to environmental • Dr. Chalker-Scott’s extensive neutralize pollutants disturbance and will in turn support a reference information is located Human benefits diverse and healthy plant population. at the following Web site: • economic Wood chips are considered to be www.puyallup.wsu.edu/~Linda%20Chalker- • aesthetic slow decomposers, as their tissues are Scott/Wood%20chip%20references.html • ease of application rich in lignin, suberin, tannins, and SUMMER 2007 www.MasterGardenerOnline.com • MASTERGARDENER • PAGE 21 other decomposition-resistant, natural them out of the landfill—a benefit with (e.g. Juglans nigra, black walnut). Cedars compounds. Thus, wood chips supply both economic and environmental (Thuja spp.) have not been found to have nutrients slowly to the system; at the same attributes. this ability. time they absorb significant amounts Concern: Mulches made from of water that is slowly released to the Drawbacks of wood chips— chipping diseased trees can infect healthy soil. It is not surprising that wood chips mulch ado about nothing trees. have been cited as superior mulches for There are a number of concerns Evidence: Most studies indicate enhanced plant productivity. Wood chips surrounding the use of arborist wood that diseased mulch cannot transmit have been especially effective in helping chips as a landscape mulch. I have pathogens to the roots of healthy trees. establish trees and native plants in urban constructed a quick summary here. Under no circumstances should wood and disturbed environments. Relevant references can be found on the mulch be used as backfill. Not only is Arborist wood chips provide Web site listed in “More Information.” this a poor installation practice, but a incredible weed control in ornamental Overall, the commonly expressed potential mechanism for disease transfer landscapes. The mechanism(s) by which concerns about woody mulches are not as well. Fungal communities found wood chips prevent weed growth are borne out in research trials. in wood chip mulches are generally not fully understood, but probably Concern: Woody mulches will decomposers, not pathogens. Under include light reduction (preventing acidify soils. healthy soil conditions, beneficial germination of some seeds and reducing Evidence: None. In field situations and harmless fungi can out-compete photosynthetic ability of buried leaves), it is difficult to significantly alter soil pH pathogens for space on plant roots. allelopathy (inhibiting seed germination), without addition of chemicals. Transient Furthermore, healthy plants are not and reduced nitrogen levels at the changes in pH may be found in the susceptible to opportunistic pathogens soil-mulch interface (reducing seedling decomposing mulch layer itself, but these such as Armillaria and Phytophthora, survival). have little effect on underlying soils. which are often ubiquitous but inactive in While there are imported wood Concern: Woody mulches, such as well-managed soils. mulches available for purchase at nurseries cedar, leach allelopathic chemicals that Concern: Wood chips could be a fire and home improvement centers, they are kill other plants. hazard, particularly when they are used on not as cost-effective as locally produced Evidence: Many plant materials landscapes around structures. wood chips, which are often free. In a contain allelopathic chemicals, which Evidence: Coarse textured organic society where using locally produced can prevent seeds from germinating or mulches, like wood chips, are the least materials is increasingly popular as a kill young seedlings. Most compounds flammable of the organic mulches. Fine measure of sustainability, arborist wood have no effect upon established plants. textured mulches are more likely to chips are a natural choice. Finally, the Only a few woody materials have been combust, and rubber mulch is the most reuse of plant materials as mulches keeps found to contain allelopathic chemicals hazardous of all tested landscape mulches. A bargain Jim Black for gardeners Arborist wood chips are available locally in many communities. Most sources are free or inexpensive for wood chips made from recycled pallets and other discarded wood products. That this mulch is both cheap and scientifically proven to be superior makes it an ideal Master Gardener-recommended product. At left, Yakima County recyling and compost education program coordinator Mikal Heintz is shown with her wood chip operation located at the county landfill. Former head of the Yakima Area Arboretum, Mikal works with the community to promote composting and wood chip mulches. PAGE 22 • MASTERGARDENER • www.MasterGardenerOnline.com SUMMER 2007 Concern: Wood chip mulches will Arborist wood mulch, when used with tie up nitrogen and cause deficiencies in contrasting landscape textures, such plants. as the gravel, rock, and grass shown at : Actually, many studies right, produces a low-maintenance but Evidence beautiful garden setting. have demonstrated that woody mulch materials increase nutrient levels in soils and/or associated plant foliage. My hypothesis is that a zone is most effective in suppressing weeds of nitrogen deficiency exists at the when weeds are not yet present on site. mulch/soil interface, inhibiting weed seed Therefore, bare soil should be mulched as germination while having no influence soon as practical, especially in the spring upon established plant roots below and fall when weed seed germination is at the soil surface. For this reason, it is its peak. If this is not possible, the most inadvisable to use high C:N mulches in effective, non-chemical way to remove annual beds or vegetable gardens where weeds prior to mulching is to mow the plants of interest do not have deep, them as close to the ground as possible, extensive root systems. followed immediately by mulching. Concern: Woody mulches will attract Prune or mow perennial weeds at termites, carpenter ants, and other pests. the root crown in early spring when root Evidence: Many wood-based mulches resources are lowest (generally just as are not attractive to pest insects but are leaf growth begins). Extensive pulling of actually insect repellent. For instance, perennial weeds from unprotected soil cedar (Thuja) species produce thujone, is not recommended, as this disturbance which repels
Recommended publications
  • Recovering from Wildfire a Guide for Arizona’S Forest Owners Tom Degomez
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION AZ1294 Revised 12/11 Recovering From Wildfire A Guide for Arizona’s Forest Owners Tom DeGomez What Do I Do Now? Wildfire, the disaster so many forest owners fear has occasional pockets of moderate to high intensity burn. happened—to you. Fire may have burned all or just a Occasionally, fires do burn at high intensity over large portion of your property, over many acres of your land or areas. Fires which burn at low intensity do not burn up just your homesite, burned it completely or only partially. the forest canopy. Most leaves or needles remain on trees, Whatever the circumstances, you’re now left wondering, even though some may be brown and the lower branches “What should I do now?” may be scorched. The ground is still partially covered by After the fire is out, it’s time to start making some old needles, leaves, and decaying wood. decisions. Although you may feel that the worst has happened, there are actions you can take now to protect Low-intensity fires are in the long run, beneficial to your property from further impacts and to recoup some maintaininga healthy forest. In fact, many Arizona tree of your losses. species and plant communities evolved with low-intensity This publication discusses issues property owners should fire as part of the natural system. These fires clear out consider following a wildfire on their property, including the underbrush, thin out young trees which may be too how to protect your valuable property from further damage numerous, and reduce the amount of fuel accumulating on due to erosion, where to go for help and financial assistance, the forest floor, thereby lessening the chance of future high how remove or salvage trees that were lost or damaged, intensity wildfires (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • EFFICACY of ORGANIC WEED CONTROL METHODS Scott Snell, Natural Resources Specialist
    FINAL STUDY REPORT (Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House, NJ) EFFICACY OF ORGANIC WEED CONTROL METHODS Scott Snell, Natural Resources Specialist ABSTRACT Organic weed control methods have varying degrees of effectiveness and cover a broad range of costs financially and in time. Studies were conducted at the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House, New Jersey to examine the efficacy and costs of a variety of organic weed control methods: tillage, organic herbicide (acetic acid), flame treatment, solarization, and use of a smother cover crop. The smother cover and organic herbicide treatment plots displayed the least efficacy to control weeds with the average percent weed coverage of each method being over 97%. The organic herbicide plots also had the greatest financial costs and required the second most treatment time following the flame treatment plots. Although the flame treatment method was time consuming, it was effective resulting in an average of 12.14% weed coverage. Solarization required below average treatment time and resulted in an average of 49.22% weed coverage. The tillage method was found to be the most effective means of control and also had well below average financial costs and required slightly above average treatment time. INTRODUCTION The final results of the third biennial national Organic Farming Research Foundation’s (OFRF) survey found that organic producers rank weed control as one of the top problems negatively affecting their farms’ profitability (1999). Weed control options available for organic producers are far more limited than those of conventional production due to organic certification standards.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCIPLES of ORGANIC FARMING SIXTH SEMESTER Polytechnic In
    A LECTURE NOTE ON Agron. 6.10 (1 + 1 = 2) PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIC FARMING SIXTH SEMESTER Polytechnic in Agriculture College of Agriculture, NAU, Bharuch Agron. 6.10 (1 + 1 = 2) Principles of Organic Farming Theory: Chapter Chapter Page No. No. 1. ORGANIC FARMING-AN INTRODUCTION 2. PRINCIPLES, SCOPE AND COMPONENTS OF ORGANIC FARMING 3. COMPONENTS OF ORGANIC FARMING AND THEIR ROLE IN SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION 4. INITIATIVES FOR PROMOTING ORGANIC FARMING 5. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC FARMING 6. DISEASE AND PEST MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC FARMING 7. WEED MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC FARMING 8. OPERATIONAL STRUCTURE OF NPOP AND NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ORGANIC FARMING 9. CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION PROCESS OF ORGANIC PRODUCT 10. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS, MARKETING AND EXPORT POTENTIAL OF ORGANIC FARMING Reference books 1. Organic farming-Theory and Practice by S.P. Palaniappan and K. Annadurai 2. Principles of organic farming by S. R. Reddy 3. Principles of Agronomy by S. R. Reddy 4. Organic crop production (Principles and practices Vol-I: Principles and General Aspects) by J. P. Sharma 5. Principles and practices of organic farming by R. Balasubramanian, K. Balakrishnan and K. Sivasubramanian CHAPTER -1 INTRODUCTION, DEFINITION, CONCEPT, IMPORTANCE, ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, OBJECTIVES, ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIC FARMING 1.1 Introduction: Green revolution technologies such as greater use of synthetic agro chemicals like fertilizers and pesticides, adoption of nutrient responsive, high-yielding varieties of crops, greater exploitation of irrigation potentials etc… has boosted the production out put in most of cases. Without proper choice and continues use of these high energy inputs is leading to decline in production and productivity of various crops as well as deterioration of soil health and environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Management Strategic Plan for Christmas Trees In
    Pest Management Strategic Plan for Christmas Trees in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho Lead Authors: Joe DeFrancesco and Katie Murray, Oregon State University Editor: Diane Clarke, University of California, Davis Summary of a workshop held on February 2 nd and 3 rd , 2009 Aurora, Oregon Issued: August 2009 Contact Person: Joe DeFrancesco Integrated Plant Protection Center Oregon State University 2040 Cordley Hall Corvallis, OR 97331-2915 (541) 737-0718 [email protected] This project was sponsored by the Western Integrated Pest Management Center, which is funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service. Table of Contents Work Group Members ................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Critical Needs ............................................................................................ 5 Introductory Pages: Process for this Pest Management Strategic Plan ............................................. 6 Regulatory Background ...................................................................................... 7 Christmas Tree Production Overview ............................................................... 8 Christmas Tree Export Markets ........................................................................ 13 Targeting Pests in Christmas Tree Production................................................ 15 Christmas Tree Pests Outline ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Intercropping Pattern in Reducing Weeds Infestation in Okra, Maize and Pepper Intercrop
    International Journal of Weed Science and Technology ISSN 4825-3499 Vol. 2 (1), pp. 063-069, January, 2018. Available online at www.advancedscholarsjournals.org © Advanced Scholars Journals Full Length Research Paper Efficacy of intercropping pattern in reducing weeds infestation in okra, maize and pepper intercrop *Ubini C. Thomas, Jaymiwhie Obanna and Ikogho B. Patrick Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, P. M. B 5323 Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Accepted 15 January, 2018 Field study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of intercropping pattern in reducing weed infestation in okra, maize and pepper intercrop; at the teaching and research farm of Rivers State University of Science and Technology Port Harcourt, Nigeria during 2009 and 2010 cropping season. Three intercropping pattern namely; alternate row intercropping, strip row intercropping and mixed intercropping were compared to sole cropping in a randomized complete block design replicated three times. The result reveal that weed biomass were significantly lower in both years in all forms of intercropping pattern compared to sole cropping or mono-cropping. Weed smothering efficiency in both years showed that mixed pattern (45.7%) >alternate row pattern (33.4%) > strip row pattern (11.5%). Crop yield were better in an intercrop system for maize and pepper in both years compared to -1 sole crop. However, mean okra fruit yield was highest in sole cropping (3253 kg ha ) when compared -1 to intercropping pattern. Maize yield was highest in mixed pattern (8,987 kg ha ) and lowest in sole -1 -1 cropping (6,955 kg ha ) while pepper fruit yield was highest in strip row pattern (5,435 kg ha ) and -1 lowest in mixed pattern (1,562 kg ha ).
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Sustainable Weed Able Weed
    PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE WEED MANAGEMENT FOR CROPLANDS AGRONOMY SYSTEMS SERIES Abstract: To some extent, weeds are a result of crop production, but to a larger extent they are a consequence of management decisions. Managing croplands according to nature’s principles will reduce weed problems. And while these principles apply to most crops, this publication focuses on agronomic crops such as corn, soybeans, milo, and small grains. The opportunities to address the root causes of weeds are not always readily apparent, and often require some imagination to recognize. Creativity is key to taking advantage of these opportunities and devising sustainable cropping systems that prevent weed problems, rather than using quick-fix approaches. Annual monoculture crop production generally involves tillage that creates conditions hospitable to many weeds. This publication discusses several alternatives to conventional tillage systems, including allelopathy, intercropping, crop rotations, and a weed- free cropping design. A Resources list provides sources of further information. By Preston Sullivan boundaries within which we operate and the NCAT Agriculture Specialist rules for success within those boundaries. September 2003 The “weed control” paradigm is reactive— it addresses weed First, Free Your Brain problems by using As Iowa farmer Tom Frantzen poetically states: various tools and tech- “Free your brain and your behind will follow.” nologies. “How am I What Tom is referring to is discovering new para- gonna get rid of this vel- digms. Joel Barker, author of Paradigms—The vet-leaf?” and “How do Business of Discovering the Future (1), defines a I control foxtail?” are re- paradigm as a set of standards that establish the active statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Handout for Introduction to Forest Gardening
    COURSE HANDOUT FOR INTRODUCTION TO FOREST GARDENING Complied by Jess Clynewood and Rich Wright Held at Coed Hills Rural Art Space 2010 ETHICS AND PRINCIPLES OF PERMACULTURE Care for the Earth v Care for the people v Fair shares PRINCIPLES Make the least change for the greatest effect v Mistakes are tools for learning v The only limits to the yield of a system are imagination and understanding Observation – Protracted and thoughtful observation rather than prolonged and thoughtless action. Observation is a key tool to re-learn. We need to know what is going on already so that we don’t make changes we will later regret. Use and value diversity - Diversity allows us to build a strong web of beneficial connections. Monocultures are incredibly fragile and prone to pests and diseases – diverse systems are far more robust and are intrinsically more resilient. Relative Location and Beneficial Connections – View design components not in isolation but as part of a holistic system. Place elements to maximise their potential to create beneficial connections with other elements. Multi-functional Design – Try and gain as many yields or outputs from each element in your design as possible. Meet every need in multiple ways, as many elements supporting each important function creates stability and resilience. Perennial systems – minimum effort for maximum gain Create no waste - The concept of waste is essentially a reflection of poor design. Every output from one system could become the input to another system. We need to think cyclically rather than in linear systems. Unmet needs = work, unused output = pollution. Stacking – Make use of vertical as well as horizontal space, filling as many niches as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Sustainable Landscape
    Building the Sustainable Urban Landscape DR. ELLEN VINCENT S O I S A MYRTLE BEACH, SC 1 8 F E B 2 0 1 4 Acknowledgments Thank you to: Dale Westemeier, City of Greenville Danny Burbage, Charleston Tom Smiley, Bartlett Tree Resources Lab Paul Minerva, Derek Ham, Steve Gillum, Tyler Jones, Clemson University And for long-term inspiration: Drs. Don Ham, Kim Coder, and Ed Gilman Overview Sustainability defined Components of the SL Design intent- Aesthetics Function: size & access Ecosystems services Cost effectiveness Vincent by Ellen Photo Sustainable spaces Centennial Oak Quercus macrocarpa, Clemson campus Sustainability: historic def. 1987 “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without Healthy compromising the ability of Environment future generations to meet Vincent Ellen by pyramid triadIssue their own needs” (World Commission, 1987, p. 8). Sustainability Economic Social Justice Development The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gro Harlan Brundtland (b. 1939) 5 http://www.kennuncorked.com/images_multiple_locations/sus_history_gro_harlem_brundtland.gif Norwegian Minister for Environmental Affairs (1974-1979) Prime Minister of Norway (Feb –Oct 1981, May 1986-Oct 1989) Chair of United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, published Our Common Future (April, 1987) aka The Brundtland Report Commissioners: 22 people 21 countries http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro_Harlem_Brundtland Sustainability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro_Harlem_Brundtland http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro_Harlem_Brundtland “The ‘environment’ is where we all live; and ‘development’ is what we all do in attempting to improve our lot within that abode. The two are inseparable” –Gro Harlem Brundtland (The Case for Sustainable Landscapes, 2009, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Suppression Funding and Forest Management Activities Act
    Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 Public Law 115-141 H. R. 1625—712 DIVISION O—WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION FUNDING AND FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ACT SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE. This division may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire Suppression Funding and Forest Management Activities Act’’. TITLE I—WILDFIRE AND DISASTER FUNDING ADJUSTMENT SEC. 102 . WILDFIRE AND DISASTER FUNDING ADJUSTMENT. (a) Section 251(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (D)(i), by striking subclauses (I) and (II) and inserting the following— ‘‘(I) the average over the previous 10 years (excluding the highest and lowest years) of the sum of the funding provided for disaster relief (as that term is defined on the date immediately before the date of enactment of the Wildfire Suppression Funding and Forest Management Activities Act); ‘‘(II) notwithstanding clause (iv), starting in fiscal year 2018, five percent of the total appropria- tions provided after fiscal year 2011 or in the previous 10 years, whichever is less, net of any rescissions of budget authority enacted in the same period, with respect to amounts provided for major disasters declared pursuant to the Robert T. Staf- ford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) and designated by the Congress and the President as an emergency pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i) of this paragraph; and ‘‘(III) the cumulative net total of the unused carryover for fiscal year 2018 and all subsequent fiscal years, where the unused carryover for each fiscal year is calculated as the sum of the amounts in subclauses (I) and (II) less the enacted appro- priations for that fiscal year that have been des- ignated as being for disaster relief.’’; (2) in subparagraph (D)(ii), by striking ‘‘not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of the Budget Control Act of 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘not later than 30 days after the H.
    [Show full text]
  • Arborist Tree Assessment Report
    Arborist Tree Assessment Report Lower Laurel School Menlo Park, California Prepared for Ahmad Sheikholeslami Director of Facilities and Operations Menlo Park City School District 181 Encinal Ave., Atherton Ca 94025 Prepared by Robert Weatherill, Certified Arborist WE 1936a Advanced Tree Care P.O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 (650) 839 9539 Office March 6, 2017 Advanced Tree Care P.O. Box 5326, Redwood City, CA 94063 650 839 9539 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction Assignment At the request of Menlo Park City School District, I was asked to provide a tree assessment of significant trees on the grounds and within 8 feet of the grounds of Lower Laurel School located at 90 Edge Rd, Atherton, CA 94027. A recent tree failure has prompted the need to inspect all the large trees around the property for health and safety. Survey Methods A visual assessment of the trees was made from the ground. No samples were collected for laboratory analysis, nor were the trees climbed as neither were part of the assignment. The trees had previously been affixed with numerical aluminum tags which are referred to in the report. Observations On March 6, 2017, I visited the school to assess the health and conditions in and around the school property. There are 25 significant trees or areas of trees included in the survey of which 23 are on this property. Many of the trees are mature, some have been maintained where as others have not been maintained for some time. Each tree is photographed with observations and recommendations for maintenance. There are some trees that require further investigation with resistograph if they are to stay; other trees show evidence of root decay and are therefore a hazard and should be removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaponicstheeasywaysample
    HOW TO DO AQUAPONICS THE EASY Way A Step-by-Step, Affordable DIY Guide to the Most Efficient Food Production System in the History of Mankind If You Have Light and Heat You Can Have Plants and Fish! SUSANNE FRIEND & TIM MANN HOW TO DO AQUAPONICS THE EASY WAY! First Edition, December 2013 ©Susanne Friend, Tim Mann, and Friendly Aquaponics, Inc, 2013. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, or transmitted in any form without express written permission from the publisher (Friendly Aquaponics, Inc.), except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in a review; nor may any part of this book be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other, without express written permission from both the authors and publisher. Cover design, all document layout, design, and artwork ©Susanne Friend, 2013 This is designed to be an E-book, and is meant to be read on a mobile device or e-reader, and not printed at all, this saves TONS of paper! If you really need to print it, print it off your printer, but make sure to print only the pages you really need to print! Mahalo Nui Loa “Great thanks, Everlasting” To The People We Call “Farmily” First and foremost, thank you to Dr. James Rakocy, for his seminal work at the University of the Virgin Islands, and for hosting the 2007 Short Course that started us on this path. Along the way have been many excellent students who asked a critical question at just the right moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming As a Method of Weed Control in Organic Farming Systems Dale R
    Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-3038 • New • January 2008 Flaming as a Method of Weed Control in Organic Farming Systems Dale R. Mutch, Extension Specialist, Michigan State University Simon A. Thalmann, Research Assistant, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Todd E. Martin, Research Assistant, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Dean G. Baas, Graduate Assistant, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station Introduction Some farmers have found that flaming Using fire to control controls certain weeds weeds in organic farming (lambsquarters and systems shows promise for pigweed, for example) reducing weed populations better than others without herbicides. A (mustards or common carefully directed flame ragweed) (Mutch et al., fueled by natural gas or liquid propane (LP) 2005). Flaming is more effective in a crop such as increases the temperature within the weed, causing corn, where the growing point is below the soil cells to rupture and effectively killing weeds surface, than in crops such as soybeans, where the while doing little damage to the crop (Fig. 1). growing point is aboveground. The authors of this Flaming disrupts weed growth through heat, so bulletin do not recommend using flaming to control it is important to flame when the plants are dry weeds in soybeans. and wind speed and direction are favorable. Both moisture and wind can lower the heat from the Exposing a weed seedling to flame for 1/10 of flame, reducing the effectiveness of the flaming a second (Row Crop, 2007) is usually enough to application (Mutch et al., 2005). ensure control, although this may vary with weed type and size (Fig.
    [Show full text]