DOCSLIB.ORG

Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois Pub# WS16 / Bulletin 789 / IL15 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Tables Table 1. Weed Response to “Burndown” Herbicides .............................................................................................19 Table 2. Application Intervals for Early Preplant Herbicides ............................................................................... 20 Table 3. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ....................................30 WEED Table 4. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ....................31 Table 5. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ...................................................32 Table 6. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ..................................33 2015 CONTROL Table 7. Grazing and Forage (Silage, Hay, etc.) Intervals for Herbicide-Treated Corn ................................. 66 OHIO, INDIANA Table 8. Rainfast Intervals, Spray Additives, and Maximum Crop Size for Postemergence Corn Herbicides .........................................................................................................................................................68 AND ILLINOIS Table 9. Herbicides Labeled for Use on Field Corn, Seed Corn, Popcorn, and Sweet Corn ..................... 69 GUIDE Table 10. Herbicide and Soil Insecticide Use Precautions ......................................................................................71 Table 11. Weed Response to Herbicides in Popcorn and Sweet Corn—Grasses ............................................73 Table 12. Weed Response to Herbicides in Popcorn and Sweet Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ...........................74 Table 13. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Soybeans—Grasses ...........................93 Table 14. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Soybeans—Broadleaf Weeds .........94 Table 15. Grasses and Nutsedge—Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Soybeans ......................... 95 Table 16. Broadleaf Weeds—Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Soybeans .................................... 96 Table 17. Rainfast Intervals and Spray Additive Recommendations for Postemergence Soybean Herbicides .......................................................................................................................................................128 Table 18. Harvest and Feeding Intervals for Soybean Herbicides .....................................................................129 Table 19. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Small Grains ....................................................... 131 Table 20. Weed Response to Herbicides in Alfalfa ................................................................................................. 146 Table 21. Weed Response to Herbicides in Grass Pastures/CRP/Grass Hay .................................................. 164 Table 22. Corn and Soybean Herbicide Premix Information ................................................................................. 181 Table 23. Restrictions on Crop Rotation ..................................................................................................................... 184 Table 24. Glossary of Glyphosate Products, Including Formulations, Surfactant Recommendations, and Manufacturers ..................................................................................................186 Table 25. Glossary of Chemical Names and Manufacturers ................................................................................. 187 Indiana Poison Control Centers Indiana Poison Center I-65 at 21st Street P.O. box 1367 Indianapolis, IN 46206-1367 (800) 382-9097 Environmental Emergencies (chemical spills) Indiana Department of Environmental Management Indiana Government Center North 100 North Center Drive Additional copies of this publication can be ordered at P.O. Box 6015 Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015 estore.osu-extension.org 24 hours: (317) 233-7745 (emergencies only) or by calling Nonemergencies: 800-451-6027 614-292-1607 Chem Trek (800) 424-9300 Indiana Pesticide Regulatory Official (including information on Worker Protection Standard WPS) Ohio residents may also order through their county Extension office. Office of the Indiana State Chemist Dept. of Biochemistry Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907 (765) 494-1492 or for WPS information (765) 494-1589 Disclaimer The information and suggestions in this publication are intended to provide guidelines for weed management in Ohio in the current calendar year only. Because of changing laws and regulations, Ohio State University Extension assumes no liability for the recommendations. The recommendations for using pesticides included in this guide are incomplete and should not serve as a substitute for pesticide labels. Complete instructions for the use of a specific pesticide are on the pesticide label. The pesticide user is responsible for applying pesticides according to label directions, as well as for problems that may arise through misapplication or misuse of the pesticide. Label changes, product cancellations, and changes in recommendations may have Illinois Poison Control Information occurred since the publication of this guide. Check with your county Extension agent in agriculture if you are in doubt about a pesticide you plan to use. Trade names have been used in this guide for clarity, but do not constitute an endorsement by The Ohio State University, nor do they imply discrimination against other products. National Poison Control Center 1-800-222-1222 Copyright © 2015, The Ohio State University This number will automatically connect you to the center closest to you. Ohio State University Extension embraces human diversity and is committed to ensuring that all research and related educational programs are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to age, ancestry, color, disability, gender identity or Spill Assistance: For major spills, Illinois law requires that emergency expression, genetic information, HIV/AIDS status, military status, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status. This statement is in accordance with United States Civil Rights Laws and the USDA. notification be made to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA). Keith L. Smith, Associate Vice President for Agricultural Administration; Associate Dean, College of Food, Agricultural, and They in turn notify the appropriate agencies for response. Their 24-hour Environmental Sciences; Director, Ohio State University Extension; and Gist Chair in Extension Education and Leadership. emergency hotline number is: For Deaf and Hard of Hearing, please contact Ohio State University Extension using your preferred communication (e-mail, relay services, or video relay services). Phone 1-800-750-0750 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. EST Monday through Friday. Inform the operator to dial 614-292-6181. Illinois Emergency Management Agency 12/14—4.2M—A&B 1-800-782-7860 Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois Mark M. Loux, Doug Doohan and Anthony F. Dobbels Department of Horticulture and Crop Science The Ohio State University William G. Johnson, Bryan G. Young and Travis R. Legleiter Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Purdue University Aaron Hager Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois Contents Weed Control Principles ..............................................................................................................1 Burndown Herbicide Programs for Corn and Soybeans ...................................................... 16 Burndown Herbicides in No-Tillage Corn and Soybeans .........................................................21 Corn Corn Herbicide Management Strategies ...................................................................................28 Preplant or Preemergence ................................................................................................................ 34 Postemergence .................................................................................................................................... 47 Postemergence—LibertyLink Corn ..................................................................................................61 Postemergence—Glyphosate-Resistant Corn ..............................................................................62 Harvest Aid ............................................................................................................................................65 Popcorn and Sweet Corn Weed Management .......................................................................... 72 Preplant or Preemergence ................................................................................................................ 75 Postemergence .....................................................................................................................................81 Popcorn Harvest Aid ...........................................................................................................................89 Postemergence—Attribute Bt11 (glufosinate-resistant) Sweet Corn .......................................89 Postemergence—Glyphosate-Resistant Sweet Corn .................................................................90 Soybeans Soybean Herbicide Management Strategies .............................................................................91 Preplant or Preemergence ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Different Mechanical Weed Control Strategies in Sugar Beets
    27. Deutsche Arbeitsbesprechung über Fragen der Unkrautbiologie und -bekämpfung, 23.-25. Februar 2016 in Braunschweig Comparison of different mechanical weed control strategies in sugar beets Vergleich verschiedener mechanischer Unkrautstrategien in Zuckerrüben Christoph Kunz*, Jonas Felix Weber, Roland Gerhards University of Hohenheim, Institute of Phytomedicine, Otto-Sander-Straße 5, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany *Corresponding author, [email protected] DOI 10.5073/jka.2016.452.059 Abstract In sugar beet (Beta vulgaris.) weed control is commonly performed by herbicide application applied broadcast at splitting during the cultivation period. Mechanical weeding can be an alternative to chemical weed control. The aim of this experiment was the estimation of weed control efficacy with the use of automatic steering technologies by camera guidance, the use of different intra row weed control implements in conservation tillage systems and the influence of these techniques to the number of uprooted sugar beets. A field experiment with a randomized complete plot design was conducted in 2015 at Ihinger Hof, Germany. Weed density ranged from 0 to 12 plants m-2 with Chenopodium album, Polygonum convolvulus, Polygonum aviculare as the most abundant weed species. Hoeing with the use of automatic steering technologies reduced the weed density by 82%. The use of finger weeders, rotary-harrow and torsion finger weeder reduced the weed density by 29% compared to common hoeing strategies. Differences in the number of uprooted sugar beets were not found across all treatments. We revealed the possibility of a more intense use of mechanical weeding technologies in combination with precision farming technologies in sugar beet. Keywords: Camera steering, inter row weeding, intra row weeding, mechanical weed control, sugar beets Zusammenfassung In Zuckerrüben (Beta vulgaris) wird die Unkrautkontrolle meistens durch eine mehrfache Herbizidapplikation auf der gesamten Ackerfläche durchgeführt.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2008/094873 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (43) International Publication Date PCT (10) International Publication Number 7 August 2008 (07.08.2008) WO 2008/094873 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every AOlN 65/00 (2006.01) A61K 36/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT,AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, (21) International Application Number: CH, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, PCT/US2008/052244 EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, (22) International Filing Date: 29 January 2008 (29.01.2008) LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG, PH, (25) Filing Language: English PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, (26) Publication Language: English ZA, ZM, ZW (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 60/887,036 29 January 2007 (29.01.2007) US GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), (71) Applicant and European (AT,BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, (72) Inventor: LIGUMS, John, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Networker Jukebox Control Command Nsrjb
    Maintenance Procedures NSRJB ( 8 ) NAME nsrjb − NetWorker jukebox control command SYNOPSIS nsrjb [ −C ][−j name ][−s server ][−v ][−f device ][−S slots | −T Ta gs | volume names ] nsrjb −L [ −j name ][−s server ][−gimnqvG ][−Y | −N ][−R | −B ][−b pool ][−f device | −J hostname ][−e forev er ][−c capacity ][−o mode ][−S slots | −T tags | volume names ] nsrjb −l [ −j name ][−s server ][−nvqrG ][−R [ −b pool ]][−f device | −J hostname ][−S slot | −T tags | volume names ] nsrjb −u [ −j name ][−s server ][−qv ][−f device ][−S slot | −T tags | volume names ] nsrjb −I [ −j name ][−s server ][−Evpq ][−I | −f device ][−S slots | −T tags | volume_names ] nsrjb −p [ −j name ][−s server ][−vq ][−f device ][−S slot | −T tag | volume name ] nsrjb −o mode [ −j name ][−s server ][−Y ][−S slots | −T tags | volume names ] nsrjb −H [ −j name ][−s server ][−EHvp ] nsrjb −h [ −j name ][−s server ][−v ] nsrjb −U uses [ −j name ][−s server ][−S slots | −T tags ] nsrjb −V [ −j name ][−s server ] nsrjb −d [ −j name ][−s server ][−v ][−N ][−Y ][−P ports ][−S slots ][−T tags ][volume names ] nsrjb −w [ −j name ][−s server ][−v ][−N ][−Y ][−P ports ][−S slots | −T tags | volume names ] nsrjb −a [ −j name ][−s server ][−vd ][−T tags |[−T tags ] volume names ] nsrjb −x [ −j name ][−s server ][−vwX ][−T tags | −S slots ] nsrjb −F [ −j name ][−s server ][−v ] −f device DESCRIPTION The nsrjb program manages resources in two broad classes of jukeboxes, remotely managed jukeboxes and locally managed jukeboxes. Remotely managed jukeboxes are controlled through an external agent.
    [Show full text]
  • What Characteristics Do All Invasive Species Share That Make Them So
    Invasive Plants Facts and Figures Definition Invasive Plant: Plants that have, or are likely to spread into native or minimally managed plant systems and cause economic or environmental harm by developing self-sustaining populations and becoming dominant or disruptive to those systems. Where do most invasive species come from? How do they get here and get started? Most originate long distances from the point of introduction Horticulture is responsible for the introduction of approximately 60% of invasive species. Conservation uses are responsible for the introduction of approximately 30% of invasive species. Accidental introductions account for about 10%. Of all non-native species introduced only about 15% ever escape cultivation, and of this 15% only about 1% ever become a problem in the wild. The process that leads to a plant becoming an invasive species, Cultivation – Escape – Naturalization – Invasion, may take over 100 years to complete. What characteristics make invasive species so successful in our environment? Lack predators, pathogens, and diseases to keep population numbers in check Produce copious amounts of seed with a high viability of that seed Use successful dispersal mechanisms – attractive to wildlife Thrive on disturbance, very opportunistic Fast-growing Habitat generalists. They do not have specific or narrow growth requirements. Some demonstrate alleleopathy – produce chemicals that inhibit the growth of other plants nearby. Have longer photosynthetic periods – first to leaf out in the spring and last to drop leaves in autumn Alter soil and habitat conditions where they grow to better suit their own survival and expansion. Why do we care? What is the big deal? Ecological Impacts Impacting/altering natural communities at a startling rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • Between-Row Mower Design for Weed Control in Organically Grown No-Till Soybeans
    BETWEEN-ROW MOWER DESIGN FOR WEED CONTROL IN ORGANICALLY GROWN NO-TILL SOYBEANS ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri ________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science ________________________________________________________________________ By GABRIEL AYICHIM ZULKARINI ABDULAI Dr. Kerry Clark, Thesis Supervisor JULY 2018 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled BETWEEN-ROW MOWER DESIGN FOR WEED CONTROL IN ORGANICALLY GROWN NO-TILL SOYBEANS Presented by Gabriel Ayichim Zulkarini Abdulai A candidate for the degree of Master of Science, Biological Engineering And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. Teng Lim Dr. Kerry Clark Dr. Leon Schumacher Dr. Steve Borgelt ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A local proverb in my home country states that ‘when someone has been good to you, appreciate them and be grateful’ It is therefore with heartfelt gratitude that I want to thank Dr. Kerry Clark for providing me with this great opportunity to grow in knowledge and to contribute to the field of mechanical weed control in organic no-till. I am most grateful for this opportunity and the scholarship given me. I also want to thank Dr. Leon Schumacher for his encouragement. Your counsel and mentorship has been helpful and contributed to making me a better student. I am also grateful to Dr. Teng Lim for his advice and support in the pursuit of my master’s degree. I want to also thank Dr. Steve Borgelt for broadening my horizon in hydraulics. Dr. Rob Myers supported and encouraged me greatly in my pursuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil
    Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil L. A. Gaston* and M. A. Locke ABSTRACT repulsion effects, acifluorfen is sorbed by soil or soil Potential surface water and groundwater contaminants include her- constituents (Pusino et al., 1991; Ruggiero et al., 1992; bicides that are applied postemergence. Although applied to the plant Pusino et al., 1993; Gennari et al., 1994b; NeÁgre et al., canopy, a portion of any application reaches the soil either directly 1995; Locke et al., 1997). Although the extent of sorp- or via subsequent foliar washoff. This study examined sorption, degra- tion in soil is generally proportional to OC content dation, and mobility of the postemergence herbicide acifluorfen (5-[2- (Gennari et al., 1994b; NeÁgre et al., 1995; Locke et al., chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid) in Dundee 1997), sorption likely involves processes other than par- silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic, Aeric Ochraqualf) taken titioning between aqueous and organic matter phases. from conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) field plots. Homogeneous In particular, acifluorfen forms complexes with divalent surface and subsurface samples were used in the sorption and degrada- tion studies; intact soil columns (30 cm long and 10 cm diam.) were and trivalent cations (Pusino et al., 1991; Pusino et al., used in the mobility study. Batch sorption isotherms were nonlinear 1993) that may be sorbed or precipitated. Complex for- (Freundlich model) and sorption paralleled organic C (OC) content. mation and subsequent sorption may partially account All tillage by depth combinations of soil exhibited a time-dependent for increased acifluorfen sorption with decreasing soil approach to sorption equilibrium that was well described by a two- pH or increasing cation exchange capacity (Pusino et site equilibrium±kinetic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Risk Assessment for Saflufenacil
    TEXT SEARCHABLE DCOUMENT 2011 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION PC Code: 118203 DP Barcode: 380638 and 381293 Thursday, April 07, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Ecological Risk Assessment for Saflufenacil Section 3 New Chemical Uses as a harvest aid on dry edible beans, dry peas, soybean, oilseeds "sunflower subgroup 20B", oilseeds "cotton subgroup 20C", and oilseeds canola "subgroup 20A". TO: Kathryn Montague, M.S., Product Manager 23 Herbicide Branch Registration Division (RD) (7505P) FROM: ~ Mohammed Ruhman, Ph.D., Agronomist 2 :4- . ""=- ........ 04!tJt! (I neith Sappington, Senior Biologist/Science Adviso~.... Vd- Environmental Risk Branch V O'f/ .../ II Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) THROUGH: Mah Shamim, Ph.D., Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch VI Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) This ecological risk assessment for saflufenacil new uses is relying on the attached previous assessment (Attachment 1). As shown in the usage summary (Table 1), the single and seasonal rate, for all the crops range from 0.045 to 0.089 lbs a.i/A are within the range application rates used in exposure modeling for the 2009 Section 3 New Chemical Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment (DP Barcode 349855). Therefore, risk findings determined for the 2009 assessment may be used in the assessment for this submittal. Specifically, the 2009 assessment found no chronic risks to avian and mammalian species at an agricultural use rate 0 0.134 lb a.i.lA. Acute risks were not determined for birds and mammals since saflufenacil was not acutely toxic at the highest doses tested.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING PLAN for Contaminants with a Vermont Health Advisory – May 2020
    PROPOSED PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING PLAN For Contaminants with a Vermont Health Advisory – May 2020 Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water & Groundwater Protection Division A Plan to Sample for Chemicals with a Vermont Health Advisory As required by Act 21 (2019), Section 10(b), the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, on or before January 1, 2020, must publish for public review and comment a plan to collect data for contaminants in drinking water from public community water systems and all non-transient non-community water systems, for which a health advisory has been established, but no Maximum Contaminant Level has been adopted. These health advisories are referred to as Vermont Health Advisories (VHAs) in this document. 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 3 II. Background ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 4 III. Determining the VHA contaminants for sampling at public water systems ………..Page 6 IV. Sampling Considerations …..…………………………………………………………………………….. Page 10 V. Proposed Sampling Plan ………………………………………………………………………….………..Page 12 Attachments Table 1 Complete List of Vermont Health Advisories (VHAs) …………………………………………..Page 13 Table 2 Proposed List of VHAs with Potential Concern ……………………………………………………Page 18 2 | P a g e I. Executive Summary The Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources was tasked with developing a sampling plan for public review, for certain drinking water contaminants that have an established health advisory, also known as the Vermont Health Advisory (VHA) but have no Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). This Sampling Plan (Plan) is targeted to public community and public non- transient non-community water systems. To provide context for public water system regulation, and standards that apply, a discussion of how VHAs and MCLs are determined is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasting-Love-At-Last-By-Amari-Ice.Pdf
    Lasting Love at Last The Gay Guide to Attracting the Relationship of Your Dreams By Amari Ice 2 Difference Press McLean, Virginia, USA Copyright © Amari Ice, 2017 Difference Press is a trademark of Becoming Journey, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the author. Reviewers may quote brief passages in reviews. Published 2017 ISBN: 978-1-68309-218-6 DISCLAIMER No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, or transmitted by email without permission in writing from the author. Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for errors, omissions, or contrary interpretations of the subject matter herein. Any perceived slight of any individual or organization is purely unintentional. Brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Cover Design: Jennifer Stimson Editing: Grace Kerina Author photo courtesy of Donta Hensley (photographer), Jay Lautner (editor) 3 To My Love: Thank you for being unapologetically and unwaveringly you, and for being a captive audience for my insatiably playful antics. #IKeep 4 Table of Contents Foreword 6 A Note About the #Hashtags 8 Introduction – Tardy for the Relationship Party 9 Chapter 1 – #OnceUponATime 16 Chapter 2 – What’s Mercury Got to Do with It? 23 Section 1 – Preparing: The Realm of #RelationshipRetrograde 38 Chapter
    [Show full text]