DOCSLIB.ORG

National Integrated Protected Areas Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Integrated Protected Areas Programme NIPAP – Final Report, March 2001 NATIONAL INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREAS PROGRAMME NIPAP A special Project of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources supported with a grant from the European Union (B7-504 I/93/20) FINAL REPORT March 2001 File location: F:\Idb\PMO\WRKDOCS\Final Report\Final\Final_Report_Nick_22nd_March_2001.doc Last revision done on 5/15/2020 at 7:50 AM by Nick Ashton-Jones C:\Users\benchlemon\Documents\Special Project LIS 290\References\NIPAP\NIPAP FINAL REPORT\1 - i NIPAP Final Report\Technical Report.doc NIPAP – Final Report, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Layout of the Report ........................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 9 2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 Context ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 History ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Constitutional Status ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2.3 Global Work Plan ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2.4 1998 Annual Workplan .................................................................................................... 11 2.2.5 The Mid-Term Review – June 1998 ................................................................................ 12 2.2.6 1999 Annual Work Plan ................................................................................................... 12 2.2.7 Site Prioritization in 1999 (Malampaya Sound and Mts. Iglit & Baco) ............................. 13 2.2.8 Special Consideration of Coron Island ............................................................................ 13 2.2.9 2000 Annual Work Plan ................................................................................................... 14 2.2.10 Six Month Extension to March 2001 ................................................................................ 14 2.3 Background Documents ............................................................................................... 15 3 ASSESSMENT BASED ON THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................... 16 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 The Logical Framework ................................................................................................... 16 3.1.2 Status Report & Analysis ................................................................................................. 16 3.2 Specific Objective: Establish effective protection and management of natural habitats and biodiversity in 8 NIPAS sites .................................................................. 17 3.2.1 Variations in the Population Density of Indicator Species ............................................... 17 3.2.2 Presence or Absence of Indicator Species .................................................................... 17 3.2.3 Changes in Land Use and Vegetation Cover .................................................................. 17 3.2.4 Presence and Implementation of General Management Plans (GMP) ........................... 18 3.3 Output One: Appropriately Designed and Legally Established Pas Within Rationalized and Delineated Boundaries .................................................................... 19 3.3.1 Conduct Ecological Studies ............................................................................................. 19 3.3.2 Conduct Socio-Economic Surveys .................................................................................. 21 3.3.3 Review and Rationalize PA Boundaries .......................................................................... 23 3.3.4 Delineate PA Boundaries ................................................................................................. 24 3.3.5 Conduct Activities Necessary to Fulfill the Thirteen Legal Requirements for Congressional Enactment of Protected Areas ................................................................. 24 3.4 Output Two: Establishment of Effective Structure and Mechanisms for Protection, Management and Administation of Protected Areas ................................................. 26 3.4.1 Prepare General Management Plan ................................................................................ 26 3.4.2 Build up PA Staff Complement and Provide Equal Opportunities to Men and Women .. 27 C:\Users\benchlemon\Documents\Special Project LIS 290\References\NIPAP\NIPAP FINAL REPORT\1 - NIPAP Final 2 Report\Technical Report.doc NIPAP – Final Report, March 2001 3.4.3 Provide Training to PA Staff ............................................................................................ 28 3.4.4 Strengthen PA Management Capability of Local Institutions and of the DENR Local and Central Level .................................................................................................................... 31 3.4.5 Provide PA Infrastructure and Equipment ....................................................................... 32 3.4.5.1 Buildings ........................................................................................................................................ 32 3.4.5.2 Transport ....................................................................................................................................... 35 3.4.5.3 Radio Equipment ............................................................................................................................ 35 3.4.5.4 Other Equipment ............................................................................................................................ 36 3.4.6 Assist and Train PAMBs in Establishing the Systems for Running the IPAF and for Collecting Fees ............................................................................................................... 39 3.4.7 Design and Organize M&E Systems at PMO and PAO Level ......................................... 39 3.4.7.1 Monitoring – Accounting ................................................................................................................. 39 3.4.7.2 Monitoring – Status Report ............................................................................................................. 39 3.4.7.3 Monitoring - BMS ........................................................................................................................... 39 3.4.7.4 Evaluation – Financial .................................................................................................................... 40 3.4.7.5 Evaluation – Management and Policy ............................................................................................. 40 3.4.8 Establish Integrated Data Base (IDB) at the PMO and PAO ........................................... 41 3.4.8.1 A Structured Digital Data-Base ....................................................................................................... 41 3.4.8.2 Repair and Maintenance ................................................................................................................ 41 3.4.8.3 GMPs ............................................................................................................................................. 41 3.4.8.4 Database Availability on Public Compact Discs .............................................................................. 41 3.4.8.5 Consolidation of Outputs ................................................................................................................ 42 3.4.8.6 The Future: PAWB/ARCBC ............................................................................................................ 42 3.4.8.7 World Wide Web Site ..................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.8.8 An IDB for Each of the Eight Sites .................................................................................................. 42 3.4.9 Establish IDB at the PMO and PAO - Library ................................................................. 49 3.4.9.1 Library Outputs .............................................................................................................................. 49 3.4.10 Establish a Geographic Information System (GIS) .......................................................... 51 3.4.11 Assist DENR/PAWB with Policy Review and Formulation .............................................. 53 3.4.11.1 DAO 98-60 – PAWB Command .................................................................................................... 53 3.4.11.2 IPAS Technical Co-ordinating Committee ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Malampaya Sound Protected
    FIFTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC ) OF THE PHILIPPINES ) First Regular Session ) SENATE Sen~te Bill No. 739 INTRODUCED BY SEN. J/NGGOY EJERCITO ESTRADA EXPLANATORY NOTE The Malampaya Sound Protected Landscape and Seascape (MSPLAS) covers eighteen (18) barangays in the municipality of Taytay and four (4) barangays in the municipality of San Vicente spanning to 200,115 hectares. It is surrounded by the municipality 'of EI Nido in the north, municipalities or Roxas, San Vicente and Dumaran in the south, South China Sea in the west, and barangays Pamantolon, Poblacion, Calauag of the municipality of Taytay in the east. MSPLAS serve as sanctuary to several rare and endangered wildlife. It has one of the largest undisturbed mangrove forest areas in the Philippines. It is home to sea cows (Dugong Dugong), which are considered endemic and threatened species. It is also a known habitat of the Irrawady Dolphin (Orcaella Brevirostris). The adjacent old-growth forests are important watersheds and serve as the habitat of Palawan Hornbill, the Bear, Cat, the Peacock Peasant and other endemic species. Due to its biodiversity and ecological significance, it was declared a protected area in 2000 through Presidential Proclamation No. 342. In line with the State's policy of securing for the Filipino people of present and future generations the perpetual existence of all native plants and animals, it is incumbent upon Congress to enact a law to provide for the management, protection, sustainable development and rehabilitation of the MSPLAS. This shall be established within the framework of the National Integrated Protected Area System (NIPAS) Act, or Republic Act of 7586, while considering the welfare and recognizing the rights of all the communities living therein especially the indigenous peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the NEWS Strategic Communication and Initiatives Service
    DATE: ____AUGUST_________ 24, 2020 DAY: _____MONDAY________ DENR IN THE NEWS Strategic Communication and Initiatives Service STRATEGIC BANNER COMMUNICATION UPPER PAGE 1 EDITORIAL CARTOON STORY STORY INITIATIVES PAGE LOWER SERVICE August 24, 2020 PAGE 1/ DATE TITLE : DENR files charges vs. Zobel personnel posted August 23, 2020 at 06:30 pm by Manila Standard Busines s Environment officials filed charges before the Department of Justice against the farm manager of billionaire Beatriz Zobel de Ayala in Palawan province for alleged cutting of a native tree and unlawful occupation of forest lands within the Malampaya Sound Protected Landscape and Seascape. The Community Environment and Natural Resources Office filed the charges against farm manager Stephen John Zaragosa and three others who were manning the structures built by the group of Zobel de Ayala in Sitio Maypa, Barangay Pancol, Taytay, Palawan. Zaragosa, along with Cirilo Ledesma, Nicasio Ledesma and Mario Caahay were named in the complaint for alleged violation of Sections 77 and 78 of Presidential Decree No. 705, as amended, or the Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines. Environment officials led by MSPLS Protected Area Superintendent Clarissa Pador and CENRO Officer Alan Valle earlier investigated reports that the group of Zobel de Ayala erected structures in the marine protected area. DENR Mimaropa Regional Executive Director Lourdes Ferrer said that: "Pursuant to our office's existing procedures, specifically DENR Administrative Order No. 1997-32, Pador has conducted the necessary adjudication proceedings regarding the illegal cutting of a Bangar tree, and the CENRO of Taytay, Palawan has already filed a complaint for violation of Sections 77 and 78 of PD No.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving from Open Access Extraction to New Participatory Levels Of
    Moving from open access extraction to new participatory levels of accountable management Malampaya Sound, Palawan, the Philippines by Jonathan Pilien and Peter Walpole Environmental Science for Social Change (ESSC) SUMMARY Pilien and Walpole observe that conflicts over the use of Malampaya Sound in northern Palawan began decades ago when commercial logging and fishing got under way. Intense resource competition continued for decades, depleting fisheries by the 1970s. Commercial fishing restrictions were imposed periodically. Officials often proposed conflicting policies and programmes for commercial development and resource conservation, usu- ally with little community support. The case study describes recent efforts to incorporate community participation in plans for making the zone part of the National Integrated Protected Area Programme. Efforts have been made to establish links between stakeholders through facilitated public dialogues, community mapping, public hearings and a strategic planning workshop. 252 NATURAL RESOURCE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CASE STUDIES: AN ANALYSIS OF POWER, PARTICIPATION AND PROTECTED AREAS GUIDING QUESTIONS KEY ISSUES ● How can local communities be participants in conflict management? ● Why do planners and policy-makers often overlook local stakeholders? CONTEXT ● Who are the local stakeholders? ● What other stakeholders are involved in the Malampaya Sound? CONFLICT BACKGROUND OR HISTORY ● What historical trends exist concerning local natural resource con- flicts? ● How does historical analysis help us understand
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines
    Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 7 Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines Michael Fabinyi Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fabinyi, Michael. Title: Fishing for fairness [electronic resource] : poverty, morality and marine resource regulation in the Philippines / Michael Fabinyi. ISBN: 9781921862656 (pbk.) 9781921862663 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Fishers--Philippines--Attitudes. Working poor--Philippines--Attitudes. Marine resources--Philippines--Management. Dewey Number: 333.91609599 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image: Fishers plying the waters of the Calamianes Islands, Palawan Province, Philippines, 2009. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents Foreword . ix Acknowledgements . xiii Selected Tagalog Glossary . xvii Abbreviations . xviii Currency Conversion Rates . xviii 1 . Introduction: Fishing for Fairness . 1 2 . Resource Frontiers: Palawan, the Calamianes Islands and Esperanza . 21 3 . Economic, Class and Status Relations in Esperanza . 53 4 . The ‘Poor Moral Fisher’: Local Conceptions of Environmental Degradation, Fishing and Poverty in Esperanza . 91 5 . Fishing, Dive Tourism and Marine Protected Areas . 121 6 . Fishing in Marine Protected Areas: Resistance, Youth and Masculinity .
    [Show full text]
  • Some Data on the Distribution, Conservation Status and Protection of Freshwater Turtles in the Palawan Island Group, Philippines
    SOME DATA ON THE DISTRIBUTION, CONSERVATION STATUS AND PROTECTION OF FRESHWATER TURTLES IN THE PALAWAN ISLAND GROUP, PHILIPPINES Pierre Fidenci1 and Reymar Castillo2 1Endangered Species International, 79 Brady Street, San Francisco, CA 94108, USA 2Research Coordinator, Biodiversity Center for Research and Conservation, Palawan State University, Puerto Princesa City, Philippines 5300; Project Manager, Philippine Forest Turtle Project, Endangered Species International – Palawan State University Introduction The Palawan Island Group is located between Mindoro Island and North Borneo, approximately 600km south-west of Manila, Philippines. Islands included in this group are Palawan (the largest island), Busuanga, Culion, Lampacan, Cuyo, Dumaran, Cagayancillo (also called Cagayanes) and Balabac. Palawan is the fifth largest island in the Philippine archipelago with an area of more than 11,000 square km. The biological importance of Palawan is widely recognized both nationally and internationally. It has even been designated as a Biosphere Reserve by UNESCO since 1990. The region includes several existing Proclaimed Conservation Areas such as Coron Islands (7,580 hectares), El Nido Marine Reserve (89,140 hectares), Malampaya Sound (90,000 hectares) and Puerto Princesa Subterranean River National Park. Palawan has also been declared a mangrove reserve. Palawan has about 422 terrestrial and known marine vertebrate species. This number accounts for about 39% of all the vertebrate species found in the Philippines. Many of the species are endemic to Palawan and have restricted ranges confined to a small area (PCSDS, 2005). The Philippine forest turtle (Siebenrockiella (= Panayenemys) leytensis) (Fig. 1) is one of the most endangered turtle species in the world and the most endangered turtle of the Philippines (Conservation International, 2003; IUCN, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Review-Fish-Habita
    United Nations UNEP/GEF South China Sea Global Environment Environment Programme Project Facility UNEP/GEF/SCS/RWG-F.8/5 Date: 12th October 2006 Original: English Eighth Meeting of the Regional Working Group for the Fisheries Component of the UNEP/GEF Project: “Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and Gulf of Thailand” Bangka Belitung Province, Indonesia 1st - 4th November 2006 INFORMATION COLLATED BY THE FISHERIES AND HABITAT COMPONENTS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA PROJECT ON SITES IMPORTANT TO THE LIFE- CYCLES OF SIGNIFICANT FISH SPECIES UNEP/GEF/SCS/RWG-F.8/5 Page 1 IDENTIFICATION OF FISHERIES REFUGIA IN THE GULF OF THAILAND It was discussed at the Sixth Meeting of the Regional Scientific and Technical Committee (RSTC) in December 2006 that the Regional Working Group on Fisheries should take the following two-track approach to the identification of fisheries refugia: 1. Review known spawning areas for pelagic and invertebrate species, with the aim of evaluating these sites as candidate spawning refugia. 2. Evaluate each of the project’s habitat demonstration sites as potential juvenile/pre-recruit refugia for significant demersal species. Rationale for the Two-Track Approach to the Identification of Fisheries Refugia The two main life history events for fished species are reproduction and recruitment. It was noted by the RSTC that both of these events involve movement between areas, and some species, often pelagic fishes, migrate to particular spawning areas. It was also noted that many species also utilise specific coastal habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass, and mangroves as nursery areas. In terms of the effects of fishing, most populations of fished species are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of high levels of fishing effort in areas and at times where there are high abundances of (a) stock in spawning condition, (b) juveniles and pre-recruits, or (c) pre-recruits migrating to fishing grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Second Workshop on the Biology and Conservation of Small Cetaceans and Dugongs of South-East Asia
    CMS Technical Series Publication Nº 9 Report of the Second Workshop on The Biology and Conservation of Small Cetaceans and Dugongs of South-East Asia Edited by W. F. Perrin, R. R. Reeves, M. L. L. Dolar, T. A. Jefferson, H. Marsh, J. Y. Wang and J. Estacion Convention on Migratory Species REPORT OF THE SECOND WORKSHOP ON THE BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF SMALL CETACEANS AND DUGONGS OF SOUTHEAST ASIA Silliman University, Dumaguete City, Philippines 24-26 July, 2002 Edited by W. F. Perrin, R. R. Reeves, M. L. L. Dolar, T. A. Jefferson, H. Marsh, J. Y. Wang and J. Estacion Workshop sponsored by Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals; additional support provided by Ocean Park Conservation Foundation, WWF-US and WWF-Philippines. Published by the UNEP/CMS Secretariat Report of the Second Workshop on the Biology and Conservation of Small Cetaceans and Dugongs of South-East Asia UNEP/CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 161 pages CMS Technical Series Publication No. 9 Edited by: W.F. Perrin, R.R. Reeves, M.L.L. Dolar, T.A. Jefferson, H. Marsh, J.Y. Wang and J. Estacion Cover illustration: digital artwork by Jose T. Badelles from a photograph by Jose Ma. Lorenzo Tan © UNEP/CMS Secretariat 2005 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP/CMS would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever with- out prior permission in writing from the UNEP/CMS Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Cutting Issues in Malampaya Sound: a Protected Seascape1
    CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES IN MALAMPAYA SOUND: A PROTECTED SEASCAPE1 Hermenegildo P Dela Peňa, MSc Director, Intellectual Property Rights Office PALAWAN STATE UNIVERSITY 1Paper presented during the 1st Palawan Research and Policy Symposium ’13, 07-08 November 2013, A & A Plaza Hotel, Puerto Princesa City • BACKGROUND • RRA FRAMEWORK • FINDINGS • CONCLUSION • BIG CHALLENGE? BACKGROUND MALAMPAYA SOUND • Taytay, Palawan • ‘Fish Bowl’ of the Philippines • 245 km2 estuary • 423 km2 catchment area (PCSDS 2006) • ≈ ⅓ of 2,000 km2 MSPLS • Irrawaddy dolphin • 60 commercial fish species • Vital for the country’s food security OBJECTIVES Identify cross-cutting issues in Malampaya Sound that contribute significantly to its major habitat degradation and the subsequent decline in fish stocks. Specifically, it aims to: • Assess the status of mangroves and coral reefs in Liminangcong, Tumbod, San Jose, and Banbanan; • Determine the uses and threats to these ecosystems; and • Describe other fishery-related issues in the study area RRA FRAMEWORK SECONDARY DATA RECONNAISSANCE/ • CLUP ANALYSIS FIELD OBSERVATION • SEMP STAKEHOLDERS’ FIELD DATA VALIDATION GATHERING WORKSHOP • 47 Fishers in (FGD,HHI)* 4 FGDs (MUNICIPAL LEVEL) • 113 HHs Systems description of the rapid rural appraisal process in Malampaya Sound (Modified from Pido et al. 1996, 1997, and Garces et al. 2010). ___________ *FGD – Focus Group Discussion HHI – Household Interview (SocMon) FINDINGS: MANGROVES USES: • Boat landing • Crab habitat • Fishing/Gleaning • Wood harvesting (charcoal making, house repair) THREATS FINDINGS: MANGROVES Sitio Leba, Liminangcong Sitio Malaya, Banbanan FINDINGS: CORAL REEFS USES: • Fishing • Gleaning THREATS: Hulbot-hulbot Dynamite FINDINGS: FISHERS & MAJOR GEARS • Ratio of fishers to population ≈ 20% • Density of fishers ≈23 fishers/km2 • Heavily exploited 60-80% decrease in catch of hook and line in the last 3 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Map: Conservation Outcomes Philippines 2007 English Pdf 2.97 MB
    Forest Cover (2001) Topography image resolution: 500 m 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Elevation (in meters) Conservation 4000 kilometers 3000 scale: 1/10,000,000 projection: Sinusoidal Outcomes 2000 central meridian 122° east longitude 1500 note: forest is defined here as >51% tree cover per grid cell 1000 500 Batanes Islands Philippines 100 Baguio Protected Landscape 120°E and Seascape Baguio 1 / 1,800,000 L u z o n 16 April 2007 Manila Manila S t r a i t 20°N 20°N Calbayog Roxas Calbayog Roxas Bacolod Ormoc Ormoc Bacolod Iloilo Iloilo Cebu Cebu Puerto Princesa Puerto Princesa Cagayan de Oro Cagayan de Oro Babuyanes Islands Davao Zamboanga Zamboanga Davao Kalbario-Patapat s National Park Buguey e Apayao Wetlands Lowland Forest North Eastern Cagayan Conservation Outcomes Protected Landscape and Seascape C Philippines a n g a y a 50 0 50 100 150 scale: 1/1,800,000 n projection: Sinusoidal i kilometers central meridian 122° east longitude Peñablanca Protected Landscape and Seascape scale: 1/97,000,000 hotspot boundary Manila town (national capitals underlined) projection: Sinusoidal central meridian 122° east longitude p S O U T H Malasi Lake biodiversity conservation corridor TALINES country border Balbalasang-Balbalan National Park Ban-ban Key Biodiversity Area* C H I N A p river Change in Protection Status of Key CORDILLERA Northern Key Biodiversity Areas with Sierra Protected Status in the Philippines Biodiversity Areas in the Philippines Madre i L u z o n Siburan Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) site lake Natural By assessing the percentage of Key Biodiversity This figure demonstrates trends in the percentage of the defined S E A Park Areas (KBAs) with formally protected status we KBAs and AZE sites under some form of legal protection for the can analyze one measure of progress towards time period 1996 – 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Progress Report September-December 2008
    In-Situ Conservation Project Phase VI Technical Progress Report September-December 2008 By Indira D. L. Widmann, Sabine Schoppe, and Siegfred Diaz With contributions from Peter Widmann Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines February 2009 PCCP Technical Progress Report TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT COUNTRY: PHILIPPINES PROJECT TITLE: PHILIPPINE COCKATOO CONSERVATION PROGRAM In-situ Conservation Project Phase VI PROJECT DURATION: September-December 2008 PROJECT SITE: Palawan, Philippines PROJECT COOPERATORS: Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Municipal Government of Narra, Palawan, Philippines Municipal Government of Dumaran, Palawan, Philippines Municipal Government of Rizal, Palawan, Philippines Culasian Barangay Government, Rizal, Palawan, Philippines Local Protected Area Management Committees (LPAMC) Sagip Katala Movement-Narra Chapter, Inc. (SKM-NC, Inc) Sagip Katala Movement-Dumaran Chapter (SKM-DC) Palawan Council for Sustainable Development Staff (PCSDS) Polillo Islands Biodiversity Conservation Foundation, Inc. Concerned agencies and authorities BY: KATALA FOUNDATION, INC. INDIRA DAYANG LACERNA-WIDMANN Program Manager SABINE SCHOPPE Program Co-Manager SIEGFRED H. DIAZ Field Operations Coordinator With contributions from Peter Widmann ADDRESS: Philippine Cockatoo Conservation Program National Highway, Bgy. San Jose or P.O. Box 390 Puerto Princesa City 5300 Palawan, Philippines Tel/Fax: +63-48-434-7693 WEBSITE: www.philippinecockatoo.org EMAIL: [email protected] or [email protected] September - December 2008
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Studies on Palawan Biodiversity Conservation Studies
    KATALA FOUNDATION, INC. (KFI), a non-stock, non-governmental Conservation Studies on Palawan Biodiversity organization, is active in protecting and conserving wildlife, particularly the Philippine cockatoo from which its name is derived and other threatened wildlife in the Philippines. Its niche developed over the years of research, advocacy, community development and practical conservation to achieve its vision that is, to effect conservation of biological diversity through active community involvement. The first part of this publication describes the results of KFI’s Katala Quest expedition in Northern Palawan, Philippines. The quest won Silver Award from the British Petroleum (BP) Conservation Programme in 2003. The second part is a compilation of conservation studies and researches conducted in Palawan by KFI or in cooperation with KFI and local partners. It is the intent of this publication to make available the findings of these researches to a wider audience to create awareness for and, if possible, to inspire more conservation projects for Palawan’s rich flora and fauna. Deborah van den Beukel and Merlin Espeso Indira Widmann, Peter Sabine Schoppe, Contact: Katala Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 390 Puerto Princesa City 5300 Palawan, Philippines Tel/Fax no. +63484347693 Email: [email protected] Webpage: www.philippinecockatoo.org Philippine Copyright 2009 by Katala Foundation, Inc., P.O. Box 390, Puerto Princesa City 5300, Palawan, Philippines All rights reserved. ISBN 978-971-94296-0-9 Printed with contributions from BP Conservation Programme through the British Petroleum, BirdLife International, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society and Fauna and Flora International and through the Philippine Cockatoo Conservation Programme principal donor Loro Parque Fundacion and funding partners Chester Zoological Gardens, Zoologische Gesellschaft für Arten- und Populationsschutz (ZGAP, incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Taytay ECAN Resource Management Plan
    Municipality of Taytay ECAN Resource Management Plan 2015-2020 Taytay ECAN Resource Management Plan 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. vi List of Annexes ............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the ECAN Zoning Plan .............................................................. 1 1.2 Target Users of the ECAN Zoning Plan ......................................................................... 1 1.3 Legal Bases of the ECAN Zoning Plan ........................................................................... 1 1.4 Existing Land Use Planning and Regulatory Frameworks in Palawan .........................
    [Show full text]