DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document Public Disclosure Authorized TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL STANDARDS INSTRUMENTS FOR NILE COOPERATION FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE PROJECT NILE COOPERATION FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE (P172848) PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized DRAFT Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized DECEMBER 2020 Contents LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. ix ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................... 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 12 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 33 1.1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................ 33 1.2 Project Development Objective (PDO) ............................................................................... 34 1.3 Project Beneficiaries.................................................................................................................. 34 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 37 2.1 Project Components .................................................................................................................. 37 2.1.1 Component 1: Advancing Nile Basin-Wide Cooperation (US$9.5 Million). 38 2.1.2 Component 2: Improving Mechanisms for Cooperation in the Nile Equatorial Lakes (NEL) Region (US$9.5 million). ......................................................................................... 40 2.1.3 Component 3: Improving Mechanisms for Cooperation in the Eastern Nile (US$9.5 million). .................................................................................................................................. 42 2.1.4 Component 4. Water Quality in the Lake Victoria Sub-Basin ($0.75 million) 44 2.1.5 Component 5. Enhancing stakeholder engagement in the Nile Basin ($0.75 million) 44 2.2 Project activities where Environmental and Social Standards are relevant ....... 47 2.3 The Hydromet system context in relation to the Nile Basin ...................................... 49 2.4 Technical description of Hydromet system ..................................................................... 51 2.4.1 Structural specification/footprint ............................................................................... 53 2.5 Purpose of Hydromet systems .............................................................................................. 62 2.6 Rationale of installing Hydromet systems ........................................................................ 63 2.7 The Environmental and Social Management Framework-ESMF ............................. 63 2.7.1 Purpose of ESMF ................................................................................................................ 63 ii 2.7.2 Purpose and scope of the ESMF ................................................................................... 64 2.7.3 Approach and Methodology in ESMF Preparation ............................................... 64 2.7.4 Literature Review .............................................................................................................. 65 2.7.5 Stakeholder and Community Consultations ............................................................ 65 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL INFORMATION ..................................... 70 3.1 Baseline Environmental Information ................................................................................. 70 3.1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 70 3.1.2 Environmental Threats.................................................................................................... 71 3.1.3 Nile River Morphology ..................................................................................................... 72 3.1.4 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................. 72 3.1.5 Water Quality ...................................................................................................................... 73 3.1.6 Land Cover ............................................................................................................................ 74 3.1.7 Biodiversity .......................................................................................................................... 74 3.2 Baseline Socio-Economic Information ............................................................................... 80 3.2.1 Socio-Economic profile of Riparian countries ........................................................ 80 3.2.2 Population in the Nile basin ........................................................................................... 80 3.2.3 Access to Potable Water and Sanitation ................................................................... 81 3.2.4 Agriculture ............................................................................................................................ 81 3.2.5 Land Use ................................................................................................................................ 82 3.2.6 Transport in the Nile Basin ............................................................................................ 82 3.2.7 HIV/AIDs Prevalence ........................................................................................................ 84 3.2.8 Sexual and Gender based violence .............................................................................. 85 3.2.9 Status of Child Labor......................................................................................................... 86 3.2.10 Prevalence of sexual violence in riparian countries ........................................... 87 3.2.11 Violence against children ................................................................................................ 88 3.2.12 Violent discipline ............................................................................................................... 88 3.2.13 Child marriage in project beneficiary countries .................................................... 88 iii 3.2.14 Education and literacy ..................................................................................................... 89 4 RELEVANT NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS ................................................................................................................................ 91 4.1 Regional and International Regulatory Framework ..................................................... 91 4.2 The National and Regulatory Framework ........................................................................ 91 4.3 World Bank Environmental and Social Framework triggered by the Nile Cooperation for Climate Resilience Project ................................................................................... 92 4.3.1 World Bank Environmental and Social Framework 2017 ................................. 92 4.3.2 Environmental and social standards (ESS) Relevant to the project .............. 92 4.3.3 ESS1 Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts 93 4.3.4 ESS2 Labor and Working Conditions ......................................................................... 94 4.3.5 ESS4 Community Health and safety............................................................................ 94 4.3.6 ESS6 Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources ............................................................................................................................... 95 4.3.7 ESS8 Cultural Heritage ..................................................................................................... 95 4.3.8 ESS 10 Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure ........................ 96 4.3.9 World Bank Group Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines ..................... 96 5 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE ............................................. 106 5.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 106 5.2 Objectives of stakeholder consultations ......................................................................... 106 5.3 Engagement with stakeholders .......................................................................................... 107 5.4 Future Consultations .............................................................................................................. 108 5.4.1 Issues for Consultation ................................................................................................. 108 5.4.2 Consultation during Mobilization and Sensitization ......................................... 108 5.4.3 Consultations on Terms of Reference (ToRs) for ESMP Studies .................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019)
    IUCN Red List version 2019-3: Table 7 Last Updated: 10 December 2019 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2018 (IUCN Red List version 2018-2) and 2019 (IUCN Red List version 2019-3) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered [CR(PE) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), CR(PEW) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct in the Wild)], EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2018) List (2019) change version Category
    [Show full text]
  • Solenodon Genome Reveals Convergent Evolution of Venom in Eulipotyphlan Mammals
    Solenodon genome reveals convergent evolution of venom in eulipotyphlan mammals Nicholas R. Casewella,1, Daniel Petrasb,c, Daren C. Cardd,e,f, Vivek Suranseg, Alexis M. Mychajliwh,i,j, David Richardsk,l, Ivan Koludarovm, Laura-Oana Albulescua, Julien Slagboomn, Benjamin-Florian Hempelb, Neville M. Ngumk, Rosalind J. Kennerleyo, Jorge L. Broccap, Gareth Whiteleya, Robert A. Harrisona, Fiona M. S. Boltona, Jordan Debonoq, Freek J. Vonkr, Jessica Alföldis, Jeremy Johnsons, Elinor K. Karlssons,t, Kerstin Lindblad-Tohs,u, Ian R. Mellork, Roderich D. Süssmuthb, Bryan G. Fryq, Sanjaya Kuruppuv,w, Wayne C. Hodgsonv, Jeroen Kooln, Todd A. Castoed, Ian Barnesx, Kartik Sunagarg, Eivind A. B. Undheimy,z,aa, and Samuel T. Turveybb aCentre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, L3 5QA Liverpool, United Kingdom; bInstitut für Chemie, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany; cCollaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; dDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76010; eDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; fMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; gEvolutionary Venomics Lab, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, 560012 Bangalore, India; hDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; iDepartment of Rancho La Brea, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles,
    [Show full text]
  • Barotse Floodplain
    Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA DETAILED ASSESSMENT, CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE IMPROVED USE OF PRIORITY TRADITIONAL CANALS IN THE BAROTSE SUB-BASIN OF THE ZAMBEZI ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT Public Disclosure Authorized ASSESSMENT Final Report October 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized 15 juillet 2004 BRL ingénierie 1105 Av Pierre Mendès-France BP 94001 30001 Nîmes Cedex5 France NIRAS 4128 , Mwinilunga Road, Sunningdale, Zambia Date July 23rd, 2014 Contact Eric Deneut Document title Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the improved use of priority canals in the Barotse Sub-Basin of the Zambezi Document reference 800568 Code V.3 Date Code Observation Written by Validated by May 2014 V.1 Eric Deneut: ESIA July 2014 V.2 montage, Environmental baseline and impact assessment Charles Kapekele Chileya: Social Eric Verlinden October 2014 V.3 baseline and impact assessment Christophe Nativel: support in social baseline report ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVED USE OF PRIORITY TRADITIONAL CANALS IN THE BAROTSE SUB-BASIN OF THE ZAMBEZI Table of content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background of the project 2 1.2 Summary description of the project including project rationale 6 1.2.1 Project rationale 6 1.2.2 Summary description of works 6 1.3 Objectives the project 7 1.3.1 Objectives of the Assignment 8 1.3.2 Objective of the ESIA 8 1.4 Brief description of the location 10 1.5 Particulars of Shareholders/Directors 10 1.6 Percentage of shareholding by each shareholder 10 1.7 The developer’s physical address and the contact person and his/her details 10 1.8 Track Record/Previous Experience of Enterprise Elsewhere 11 1.9 Total Project Cost/Investment 11 1.10 Proposed Project Implementation Date 12 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing of Genetic Analyses Methods of Feces from the Water Shrew, Chimarrogale Platycephalus (Erinaceidae, Eulipotyphla)
    Central JSM Biology Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Article *Corresponding author Koji Tojo, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto, Nagano 390- Establishing of Genetic 8621, Japan, Tel: 81-263-37-3341; Email: Submitted: 11 April 2017 Analyses Methods of Feces Accepted: 28 April 2017 Published: 30 April 2017 from the Water Shrew, ISSN: 2475-9392 Copyright Chimarrogale platycephalus © 2017 Tojo et al. OPEN ACCESS (Erinaceidae, Eulipotyphla) Keywords • River ecosystem 1 2 1 Tomohiro Sekiya , Hidetaka Ichiyanagi , and Koji Tojo * • Top predator 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, Japan • Non-damaged sampling 2Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Japan • Genetic structure • Analysis method development Abstract The Japanese endemic water shrew, Chimarrogale platycephalus is a small mammal adapted to mountain streams, and is the apex predator within its hierarchy preying on fish and aquatic benthos. Therefore, it is considered to be an extremely important species in the conservation of mountain stream ecosystems. Currently, a reduction in the number of habitats available and/or a decrease in populations, indicates that it is being threatened in various areas of Japan. They have been listed as being in critical status on the red list. With respect to the conservation of such endangered species, the accumulation of basic knowledge such as population structure and an understanding of genetic structure for each population are a very important. However, the accumulated ecological knowledge and knowledge of population genetics gathered to date is still at a poor level because this water shrew is relatively difficult to capture alive.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Species Included in ACE-II Native and Harvest Species Richness Counts (Appendix C)
    Appendix C. Species included in native and harvest species richness counts. Animal Species Included in the Range Analysis....... ............................ ................................. C-01 Animal Species with Range Models Not Included in the Analysis......................... ................. C-20 Animal Species without Range Models, therefore not Included in the Analysis......... ............ C-20 Fish Species Included in the Range Analysis.................................................................... ....... C-30 Fish with Ranges not Included in the Analysis because neither Native nor Harvest................ C-33 Native Plants Species Included in the Range Analysis............................................................. C-34 CWHR Species and ACEII hexagon analysis of ranges. Of the 1045 species in the current CWHR species list used in ACE-II, 694 had range models digitized for use. Of those, 688 are included in this hexagon analysis of the state of Cailfornia, with 660 of those classified as native to California. There were no additional species picked up offshore due to the use of hexagon centroid points. Animal species INCLUDED in this analysis. CODE COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME A001 CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER Ambystoma californiense NATIVE A002 NORTHWESTERN SALAMANDER Ambystoma gracile NATIVE A003 LONG-TOED SALAMANDER Ambystoma macrodactylum NATIVE A047 EASTERN TIGER SALAMANDER Ambystoma tigrinum INTROD A021 CLOUDED SALAMANDER Aneides ferreus NATIVE A020 SPECKLED BLACK SALAMANDER Aneides flavipunctatus NATIVE A022
    [Show full text]
  • Redescription of the Malaysian Mole As to Be a True Species, Euroscaptor Malayana (Insectivora, Talpidae)
    国立科博専報，（45）: 65–74, 2008年3月28日 Mem. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Tokyo, (45): 65–74, March 28, 2008 Redescription of the Malaysian Mole as to be a True Species, Euroscaptor malayana (Insectivora, Talpidae) Shin-ichiro Kawada1, Masatoshi Yasuda2, Akio Shinohara3 and Boo Liat Lim4 1 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1, Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169–0073, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Forest Zoology Laboratory, Kyushu Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 4–11–16 Kurokami, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 860–0862, Japan 3 Department of Bio-resources, Division of Biotechnology, Frontier Science Research Center, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889–1692, Japan 4 Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Kuala Lumpur 43200, Malaysia Abstract. The Malaysian mole is far isolated population of genus Euroscaptor, described in 1940. Since the original description, the Malaysian mole has been placed as subspecies of Hi- malayan or Thailand species or synonym of the other species, and it has never been treated as a in- dependent species. Recent results of the morphological, karyological and molecular phylogenetic researches assigned that the Malaysian mole is clearly distinct from other species of Euroscaptor. In this study, detail morphological characters of the Malaysian mole are redescribed. With the dis- cussion of the history of the tea plantation of the mole’s habitats in Peninsular Malaysia, the Malaysian mole is considered as a native species with distinct characters from other species of genus Euroscaptor. Key words : Euroscaptor malayana, morphology, description, distinct species. specimens of moles (Kawada et al., 2003). They Introduction were identified as Chasen’s Malaysian mole.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Guidelines for the Captive Keeping of Anurans
    Standard Guidelines for the Captive Keeping of Anurans Developed by the Workgroup Anurans of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde (DGHT) e. V. Informations about the booklet The amphibian table benefi ted from the participation of the following specialists: Dr. Beat Akeret: Zoologist, Ecologist and Scientist in Nature Conserva- tion; President of the DGHT Regional Group Switzerland and the DGHT City Group Zurich Dr. Samuel Furrer: Zoologist; Curator of Amphibians and Reptiles of the Zurich Zoological Gardens (until 2017) Prof. Dr. Stefan Lötters: Zoologist; Docent at the University of Trier for Herpeto- logy, specialising in amphibians; Member of the Board of the DGHT Workgroup Anurans Dr. Peter Janzen: Zoologist, specialising in amphibians; Chairman and Coordinator of the Conservation Breeding Project “Amphibian Ark” Detlef Papenfuß, Ulrich Schmidt, Ralf Schmitt, Stefan Ziesmann, Frank Malz- korn: Members of the Board of the DGHT Workgroup Anurans Dr. Axel Kwet: Zoologist, amphibian specialist; Management and Editorial Board of the DGHT Bianca Opitz: Layout and Typesetting Thomas Ulber: Translation, Herprint International A wide range of other specialists provided important additional information and details that have been Oophaga pumilio incorporated in the amphibian table. Poison Dart Frog page 2 Foreword Dear Reader, keeping anurans in an expertly manner means taking an interest in one of the most fascinating groups of animals that, at the same time, is a symbol of the current threats to global biodiversity and an indicator of progressing climate change. The contribution that private terrarium keeping is able to make to researching the biology of anurans is evident from the countless publications that have been the result of individuals dedicating themselves to this most attractive sector of herpetology.
    [Show full text]
  • Cailleux 2021 Hedgehogs Berg Aukas
    A spiny distribution: new data from Berg Aukas I (middle Miocene, Namibia) on the African dispersal of Erinaceidae (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia). Florentin Cailleux Comenius University, Department of Geology and Palaeontology, SK-84215, Bratislava, Slovakia, and Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands. (email: [email protected]) Abstract : Material of Erinaceidae (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia) from Berg Aukas I (late middle Miocene, Namibia) is described. Originally identified as belonging to the gymnure Galerix, the specimens from Berg Aukas I are herein attributed to the hedgehog Amphechinus cf. rusingensis, and they represent the last known occurence of Amphechinus in Africa. Its persistence in Northern Namibia may have been favoured by its generalist palaeoecology and the heterogeneous aridification of southern Africa during the middle Miocene. In addition, an update of the data acquired on African Erinaceidae is provided: a migration of the Galericinae to southern Africa is no longer supported; all attributions of African middle Miocene to Pliocene material to the genus Galerix are considered to be improbable; at least two migratory waves of Schizogalerix are recognized in northern Africa with S. cf. anatolica in the late middle Miocene (Pataniak 6, Morocco) and S. aff. macedonica in the late Miocene (Sidi Ounis, Tunisia). Key Words : Erinaceidae, Amphechinus, Biogeography, Miocene, Africa. To cite this paper : Cailleux, F. 2021. A spiny distribution: new data from Berg Aukas I (middle Miocene, Namibia) on the African dispersal of Erinaceidae (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia). Communications of the Geological Survey of Namibia, 23, 178-185. Introduction While the family Erinaceidae Unexpectedly, Eulipotyphla are (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia) is a frequent element poorly-represented.
    [Show full text]
  • Myoglobin Primary Structure Reveals Multiple Convergent Transitions To
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Myoglobin primary structure reveals multiple convergent transitions to semi- aquatic life in the world’s smallest mammalian divers Kai He1,2,3,4*, Triston G Eastman1, Hannah Czolacz5, Shuhao Li1, Akio Shinohara6, Shin-ichiro Kawada7, Mark S Springer8, Michael Berenbrink5*, Kevin L Campbell1* 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; 3State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China; 4Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Single Cell Technology and Application, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; 5Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 6Department of Bio-resources, Division of Biotechnology, Frontier Science Research Center, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan; 7Department of Zoology, Division of Vertebrates, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan; 8Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States *For correspondence: Abstract The speciose mammalian order Eulipotyphla (moles, shrews, hedgehogs, solenodons) [email protected] (KH); combines an unusual diversity of semi-aquatic, semi-fossorial, and fossorial forms that arose from [email protected]. terrestrial forbearers. However, our understanding of
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Priority Ecoregions for Amphibian Conservation in the U.S. and Canada
    Acknowledgements This assessment was conducted as part of a priority setting effort for Operation Frog Pond, a project of Tree Walkers International. Operation Frog Pond is designed to encourage private individuals and community groups to become involved in amphibian conservation around their homes and communities. Funding for this assessment was provided by The Lawrence Foundation, Northwest Frog Fest, and members of Tree Walkers International. This assessment would not be possible without data provided by The Global Amphibian Assessment, NatureServe, and the International Conservation Union. We are indebted to their foresight in compiling basic scientific information about species’ distributions, ecology, and conservation status; and making these data available to the public, so that we can provide informed stewardship for our natural resources. I would also like to extend a special thank you to Aaron Bloch for compiling conservation status data for amphibians in the United States and to Joe Milmoe and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program for supporting Operation Frog Pond. Photo Credits Photographs are credited to each photographer on the pages where they appear. All rights are reserved by individual photographers. All photos on the front and back cover are copyright Tim Paine. Suggested Citation Brock, B.L. 2007. Identifying priority ecoregions for amphibian conservation in the U.S. and Canada. Tree Walkers International Special Report. Tree Walkers International, USA. Text © 2007 by Brent L. Brock and Tree Walkers International Tree Walkers International, 3025 Woodchuck Road, Bozeman, MT 59715-1702 Layout and design: Elizabeth K. Brock Photographs: as noted, all rights reserved by individual photographers.
    [Show full text]