DOCSLIB.ORG

Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 9 Porhomma cavernicola Porhomma cavernicola Appalachian Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 9 Talanites echinus A Gnaphosid Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 9 Allocrangonyx hubrichti Central Missouri Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 9 Caecidotea cannula Asellus cannulus A Cave Obligate Isopod Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 8 Caecidotea carolinensis Bennett's Mill Cave Water Slater Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 9 Caecidotea dimorpha An Isopod Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 9 Caecidotea holsingeri Asellus holsingeri, Holsinger's Cave Isopod Invertebrate Crustacean G5 N5 Pseudobaicalasellus holsingeri 9 Caecidotea simonini Asellus siminini Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 9 Caecidotea sinuncus Asellus sinuncus Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 8 Cambarus bouchardi Big South Fork Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 8 Cambarus chaugaensis A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Cambarus cymatilis A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1 N1 8 Cambarus englishi A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 8 Cambarus extraneus Chickamauga Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Cambarus georgiae Little Tennessee Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1 N1 9 Cambarus hubrichti Salem Cave Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G4 N4 8 Cambarus miltus Rusty Grave Digger Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 9 Cambarus nerterius A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3G4 N3N4 8 Cambarus parrishi A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1 N1 8 Cambarus reburrus French Broad Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3G4 N3N4 31 October 2005 1 Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 8 Cambarus speciosus A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 9 Cauloxenus stygius Northern Cavefish Copepod Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 9 Crangonyx packardi Packard's Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G5 N5 8 Fallicambarus danielae Speckled Burrowing Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Fallicambarus gordoni Camp Shelby Burrowing Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1 N1 8 Fallicambarus strawni A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 8 Faxonella beyeri A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G4 N4 8 Faxonella creaseri A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Hobbseus attenuatus Pearl Riverlet Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Orconectes blacki A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 3 Orconectes deanae Conchas Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 9 Orconectes eupunctus Coldwater Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Orconectes hathawayi A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 9 Orconectes indianensis A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 9 Orconectes inermis inermis A Troglobitic Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G5T3T4 N3N4 9 Orconectes kentuckiensis A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Orconectes maletae A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 9 Orconectes meeki A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G4 N4 8 Orconectes menae A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 9 Orconectes peruncus Big Creek Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 9 Orconectes placidus A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G5 N5 8 9 Orconectes williamsi A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Procambarus attiguus Silver Glen Springs Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 8 Procambarus barbiger Jackson Prairie Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Procambarus delicatus Bigcheek Cave Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1 N1 8 Procambarus fitzpatricki Spinytail Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G2 N2 8 Procambarus kensleyi A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 8 Procambarus marthae A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 8 Procambarus nechesae A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 8 Procambarus nigrocinctus A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 8 Procambarus orcinus Woodville Karst Cave Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3G4 N3N4 8 Procambarus penni Pearl Blackwater Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 8 Procambarus reimeri A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G1 N1 8 Procambarus tenuis A Crayfish Invertebrate Crustacean G3 N3 3 Stygobromus arizonensis Arizona Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 8 Stygobromus carolinensis Carolina Seep Scud Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 9 Stygobromus culveri Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 9 Stygobromus emarginatus Greenbrier Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G3G4 N3N4 9 Stygobromus nanus An Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G1G2 N1N2 9 Stygobromus onondagaensis Onondaga Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G5 N5 9 Stygobromus parvus Apocrangonyx parvus Minute Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G2G3 N2N3 9 Stygobromus subtilis Apocrangonyx subtilis Subtle Cave Amphipod Invertebrate Crustacean G3G4 N3N4 31 October 2005 2 Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 8 Acroneuria kosztarabi Kosztarab's Common Stonefly Invertebrate Insect G1 N1 3 Aeshna dugesi Arroyo Darner Invertebrate Insect G4 N2N3 9 Aflexia rubranura Flexamia rubranura Red-Tailed Leafhopper Invertebrate Insect G1G2 NNR 3 Agathon arizonicus Invertebrate Insect G1 NNR 3 Agathymus alliae Mojave Giant-skipper Invertebrate Insect G4 N4 3 Agathymus aryxna Arizona Giant-skipper Invertebrate Insect G4G5 N2 3 Agathymus baueri freemani Agathymus freemani Freeman's Agave Borer Invertebrate Insect G4T2T3 N2N3 3 Agathymus evansi Huachuca Giant-skipper Invertebrate Insect G2G3 N2 3 Agathymus neumoegeni Orange Giant-skipper Invertebrate Insect G4G5 N4N5 3 Agathymus polingi Poling's Giant-skipper Invertebrate Insect G4 N3N4 8 Alloperla natchez Natchez Stonefly Invertebrate Insect G2 N2 3 Amblycheila baroni Montane Giant Tiger Beetle Invertebrate Insect G3 N3 3 Amblycheila picolominii Plateau GiantTiger Beetle Invertebrate Insect G3 N3 3 Amblycheila schwarzi Mojave Giant Tiger Beetle Invertebrate Insect G3 N3 9 Amblyscirtes belli Bell's Roadside-skipper Invertebrate Insect G3G4 N3N4 3 Ameletus falsus False Ameletus Mayfly Invertebrate Insect G2G4 N2N4 3 Anthocharis cethura Anthocharis pima Desert Orangetip Invertebrate Insect G4G5 N4N5 3 Apodemia phyciodoides Crescent Metalmark Invertebrate Insect G2G3 NNA 9 Appalachia arcana Michigan Bog Grasshopper Invertebrate Insect G2G3 N2N3 3 Argia sabino Sabino Dancer Invertebrate Insect G1G2 N1N2 9 Arrhopalites ater A Cave Obligate Springtail Invertebrate Insect G1G2 N1N2 9 Arrhopalites carolynae A Cave Springtail Invertebrate Insect G2G4 N2N4 9 Arrhopalites lewisi A Cave Obligate Springtail Invertebrate Insect GNR NNR 9 Arrhopalites whitesidei Invertebrate Insect GNR NNR 1 8 Atrytone arogos Arogos Skipper Invertebrate Insect G3 N3N4 3 Atrytonopsis cestus Cestus Skipper Invertebrate Insect G3G4 N1N3 9 Atrytonopsis hianna Dusted Skipper Invertebrate Insect G4G5 N4N5 8 Atrytonopsis loammi Loammi Skipper Invertebrate Insect G1 N1 9 Batrisodes krekeleri Invertebrate Insect G1 N1 8 Beloneuria georgiana Georgia Beloneurian Stonefly Invertebrate Insect G2 N2 9 Boloria chariclea montinus Boloria titania montinus White Mountain Fritillary Invertebrate Insect G5T2 N2 8 Brachypanorpa jeffersoni Jefferson's Short-nosed Scorpionfly Invertebrate Insect G2 NNR 3 Calephelis arizonensis Calephelis rawsoni Arizona Metalmark Invertebrate Insect G3G4 N2 arizonensis 9 Calephelis muticum Calephelis mutica Swamp Metalmark Invertebrate Insect G3 N3N4 3 Callophrys comstocki Desert Green Hairstreak Invertebrate Insect G2G3 N2N3 3 Callophrys fotis Incisalia fotis Desert Elfin Invertebrate Insect G3G4 N3N4 9 Callophrys henrici Incisalia henrici Henry's Elfin Invertebrate Insect G5 N5 8 9 Callophrys irus Incisalia irus Frosted Elfin Invertebrate Insect G3 N3 8 Catocala herodias gerhardi Herodias or Pine Barrens Underwing Invertebrate Insect G3T3 NNR 31 October 2005 3 Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 9 Ceraclea vertreesi Athripsodes vertreesi Vertrees's Ceraclean Caddisfly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Especies Vegetales En Peligro, Su Distribución Y Estatus De Conservación De Los Ecosistemas Donde Se Presentan
    ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN ENDANGERED VEGETAL SPECIES, THEIR DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE ECOSYSTEMS IN WHICH THEY OCCUR Mario Humberto Royo-Márquez1, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo2 y Gustavo Quintana-Martínez2 RESUMEN En México, la norma oficial mexicana (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) integra especies de flora y fauna silvestres en riesgo, pero no especifica su distribución geográfica. Como base para la realización de planes de conservación en el estado de Chihuahua es importante identificar las plantas incluidas en dicha norma, otras que deberían integrarse por su distribución restringida y rareza, así como el estado de conservación de los ecosistemas donde se presentan. En este contexto, se revisó una base de datos de alrededor de 4 000 especies de la flora de la entidad; se consultó la literatura disponible; y se realizaron visitas a diversos herbarios. En total se documentaron 195 taxa, 59 con estatus según la NOM-059, pertenecientes a 40 géneros y 21 familias, de los cuales, 19 especies son endémicas para México. Además, se proponen 31 taxa de 23 géneros y nueve familias, para ser estudiadas y evaluar su posible incorporación en la Norma, ya que son endemismos locales o registros únicos para México. Se sugieren 105 especies consideradas como raras, incluidas en 76 géneros y 37 familias. Los bosques y pastizales presentan el mayor número de especies con estatus y la más grande superficie con vegetación secundaria, lo que indica que esos ecosistemas presentan diversos grados de deterioro. Se requieren estudios poblacionales de las especies propuestas para plantear estrategias de conservación y manejo sustentable de los ecosistemas donde se desarrollan.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Road Vehicle Plan
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Tusayan Ranger District Travel Management Project April 2009 Southwestern Region Tusayan Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Coconino County, Arizona Information Contact: Charlotte Minor, IDT Leader Kaibab National Forest 800 S. Sixth Street, Williams, AZ 86046 928-635-8271 or fax: 928-635-8208 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Chapter 1 5 Document Structure 5 Introduction 5 Background 8 Purpose and Need 10 Existing Condition 10 Desired Condition 12 Proposed Action 13 Decision Framework 15 Issues 15 Chapter 2 - Alternatives 17 Alternatives Analyzed
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum Pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, Or Independent Domestication
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1v84t8z1 Journal KIVA, 83(4) ISSN 0023-1940 Authors Graham, AF Adams, KR Smith, SJ et al. Publication Date 2017-10-02 DOI 10.1080/00231940.2017.1376261 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California KIVA Journal of Southwestern Anthropology and History ISSN: 0023-1940 (Print) 2051-6177 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ykiv20 A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication Anna F. Graham, Karen R. Adams, Susan J. Smith & Terence M. Murphy To cite this article: Anna F. Graham, Karen R. Adams, Susan J. Smith & Terence M. Murphy (2017): A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication, KIVA, DOI: 10.1080/00231940.2017.1376261 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00231940.2017.1376261 View supplementary material Published online: 12 Oct 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ykiv20 Download by: [184.99.134.102] Date: 12 October 2017, At: 06:14 kiva, 2017, 1–29 A New Record of Domesticated Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.) in Colorado: Travel, Trade, or Independent Domestication Anna F. Graham1, Karen R. Adams2, Susan J. Smith3, and Terence M.
    [Show full text]
  • OCR Document
    Abelmoschus-Allium 1 Abelmoschus manihot white-yellow to 2m 110 69 Agastache pallidiflora ssp neomexicana lavender-pink 2 Abies koreana yellow dwarf 50 x 20cm 161 45-75cm 258 3 Acaena myriophylla greenish 15-25cm 106 70 rugosa rose/violet to 120cm 253 4 sericea purple fls/silver lvs 6-25cm 62 242 71 rugosa 'Golden Jubilee' blue-purple/chartreuse lvs 100cm 236 5 Acantholimon araxanum pink 15-20cm 243 72 rugosa 'Honey Bee Blue' blue 60-90cm 130 6 armenum pink/white 10-20cm 233 73 rugosa 'Liquorice Blue' deep blue 60-75cm 130 7 capitatum pink 4-18cm 242 74 rupestris pink-orange 60cm 205 8 halophilum light pink 5-10cm 233 75 rupestris 'Apache Sunset' dp orange/rose purple 45-60cm 149 9 hohenackeri pink 5-10cm 243 76 Ageratum houstonianum white 30-80cm 227 10 kotschyi pink 5-10cm 67 77 Agoseris glauca yellow 5-60cm 67 11 litvinovii pale pink 5-15cm 242 78 grandiflora yellow 25-60cm 227 12 saxifragiforme deep pink 5-10cm 6 79 Agrimonia pilosa v pilosa yellow 30-120cm 256 13 sp white 5cm 6 80 Akebia quinata 'Variegata' cream marbled lvs to 12m 259 14 sp ex Ala Dag pink 5cm 6 81 Albuca humilis white/green 15cm 140 15 venustum pink 10-15cm 233 82 shawii yellow 30-45cm > 16 Acanthus hungaricus pink/mauve to 1.5m 56 83 sp ex JCA 15856 white/green 15cm 105 17 Acer griseum to 12m 229 84 Alcea rosea mix 2-3m 34 18 palmatum 'Sango-kaku' 6-7.5m 198 85 rosea pink 2-3m 238 19 palmatum v dissectum 'Crimson Queen' to 3m 149 86 rosea 'Nigra' dark maroon 1.5-2m 34 20 Achillea clavennae white to 25cm 51 87 rosea spp ficifolia yellow/orange to 2.25m 34 21 millefolium
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Vol 3 FC
    PLANTS+ OF THE BLACK RANGE OF NEW MEXICO Volume Three Arranged by english common name This checklist recognizes the plant collecting efforts of Anna Isabel Mulford in the Black Range during 1895. PLANTS+ OF THE BLACK RANGE OF NEW MEXICO An Annotated Checklist Edition One of Volume three This checklist of the plants (including a few lichen and other Black Range website, a search for specimen sheets was non-plant species) of the Black Range of southwestern New conducted; Mexico draws from a variety of sources. It is a work in progress and undoubtedly contains errors. If you encounter ✦ If a specimen sheet from the Black Range was located errors of substantive omission or commission or for the species, an entry noting this was made in the administrative errors (broken or incorrect links, spelling, notes column. The name of the collector and the etc.) please let me know at [email protected] so that general location where the specimen was collected the errors can be corrected in the second edition. Your help was entered in the notes column as a link to the in this manner will be of benefit to the general community. specimen sheet. Such entries are shown in dark blue. Methodology ✦ Species which are not verified for the Black Range are indicated by a light blue “cell filling” in the first cell in This checklist was put together in the following manner: the species row. ✦ A search of the SEINet data base (Arizona & New Mexico Chapters) was conducted to determine the Disclaimers and possible species in the Black Range; Points of Clarification ✦ A preliminary search of the Consortium of North In some cases, you may note that an entry from the Vascular American Lichen Herbaria data base was conducted to Plants of the Gila Wilderness data base has been entered on determine possible species in the Black Range (this the checklist but the initial cell of the species listing is filled work is incomplete); in light blue indicating that the species was not verified for the Black Range following the process described above.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship and Oviposition Patterns of Two Agathymus (Megathymidae)
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(3). 1985. 171-176 COURTSHIP AND OVIPOSITION PATTERNS OF TWO AGATHYMUS (MEGATHYMIDAE) DON B. STALLINGS AND VIOLA N. T. STALLINGS P.O. Box 106, 616 W. Central, Caldwell, Kansas 67022 AND J. R. TURNER AND BEULAH R. TURNER 2 South Boyd, Caldwell, Kansas 67022 ABSTRACT. Males of Agathymus estelleae take courtship sentry positions near ten­ eral virgin females long before the females are ready to mate. Males of Agathymus mariae are territorial and pursue virgin females that approach their territories. Ovipo­ sition patterns of the two species are very similar. Females alight on or near the plants to oviposit and do not drop ova in flight. Few detailed observations of the courtship and oviposition of the skipper butterflies in natural environments have been published. For the family Megathymidae Freeman (1951), Roever (1965) (and see Toliver, 1968) described mating and oviposition of some Southwestern U.S. Agathymus, and over a hundred years ago (1876) Riley published an excellent paper on the life history of Megathymus yuccae (Bois­ duval & LeConte) which included data on oviposition of the female; otherwise, only the scantiest comments have been made. C. L. Rem­ ington (pers. comm.) and others tell us that there is a significant pos­ sibility that the Hesperioidea are less closely related to the true but­ terflies (Papilionoidea) than to certain other Lepidoptera and even that the Megathymidae may not be phylogenetically linked to the Hesper­ iidae. For several years we have been making on-the-scene studies of these two aspects of megathymid behavior, both for their interest in understanding the whole ecology of these insects and for their possible reflection on higher relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales ISSN: 2007-1132 [email protected] Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias México Royo-Márquez, Mario Humberto; Melgoza-Castillo, Alicia; Quintana-Martínez, Gustavo ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, vol. 5, núm. 22, marzo-abril, 2014, pp. 86-103 Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63439004007 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN ENDANGERED VEGETAL SPECIES, THEIR DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE ECOSYSTEMS IN WHICH THEY OCCUR Mario Humberto Royo-Márquez1, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo2 y Gustavo Quintana-Martínez2 RESUMEN En México, la norma oficial mexicana (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) integra especies de flora y fauna silvestres en riesgo, pero no especifica su distribución geográfica. Como base para la realización de planes de conservación en el estado de Chihuahua es importante identificar las plantas incluidas en dicha norma, otras que deberían integrarse por su distribución restringida y rareza, así como el estado de conservación de los ecosistemas donde se presentan. En este contexto, se revisó una base de datos de alrededor de 4 000 especies de la flora de la entidad; se consultó la literatura disponible; y se realizaron visitas a diversos herbarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Alma Mater Studiorum Università Degli Studi Di Bologna Pollination
    Alma Mater Studiorum Università degli studi di Bologna Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences Department of Experimental Evolutionary Biology PhD in Biodiversity and Evolution BIO/02 Pollination ecology and reproductive success in isolated populations of flowering plants: Primula apennina Widmer, Dictamnus albus L. and Convolvulus lineatus L. Candidate: Alessandro Fisogni PhD Coordinator: PhD Supervisor: Prof. Barbara Mantovani Marta Galloni, PhD Cycle XXIII 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................7 1.1 Plant breeding systems ..................................................................................7 1.1.1 Distyly .......................................................................................................9 1.1.2 Resource allocation to sexual functions ..............................................10 1.2 Plant – pollinator interactions .......................................................................12 1.2.1 Floral rewards ........................................................................................12 1.2.2 Pollinators behaviour and insect-mediated geitonogamy ..................13 1.2.2 Pollen limitation and reproductive effort ..............................................14 1.3 Isolated populations, habitat fragmentation and demographic consequences ...........................................................................................................16 2. General purposes .....................................................................................19
    [Show full text]