DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Paper 2015 ENG-B5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Paper 2015 ENG-B5 | FORUM ZA ETNIČKE ODNOSE FORUM FOR ETHNIC RELATIONSELAELATIONS Normalization Challenges PhD DUŠAN JANJIĆ FORUM ZA ETNIČKE ODNOSE FORUM FOR ETHNIC RELATIONS 1 2015 PhD DUŠAN JANJIĆ Normalization Challenges Analysis of the Negotiation Process and Implementation of the Brussels Agreement Belgrade, 2015. NORMALIZATION CHALLENGES ANALYSIS OF THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BRUSSELS AGREEMENT Belgrade, November 2015 Kraljice Natalije 45/VII 11000 Beograd, Srbija +381 11 36 20 804 [email protected] • www.fer.org.rs This publication is the result of the activities carried out on the project “Consultations on Normalization of Kosovo-Serbian-Relations”, which was realized from 2013 until 2015. The project was supported by KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG, offi ce in Belgrade, www.kas.de/serbien. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG, offi ce in Belgrade. CONTENTS Introduction. 5 I) Normalization – the Path from Confl ict to a “European Future” . 6 a) The Historical and Political Circumstances which Preceded the Brussels dialogue. 6 b) Normalization – the Way toward a Possible Solution . 11 II) Brussels Agreement . 20 a) Technical Agreements . 21 1. Freedom of Movement . 22 2. Integrated Border Management (IBM) . 26 3. Customs Revenue Collection and Customs Stamps . 28 4. Interim Fund for Economic and Infrastructural Development of Northern Kosovo 30 5. Civil Registry Books. 31 6. Cadastral Records . 32 7. University Diplomas . 32 8. Regional Representation and Cooperation . 34 b) First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalization of Relations . 34 1. Law on Amnesty. 38 2. Municipal Elections and Inauguration of Local Authorities . 39 3. Community/Association of Serb Majority Municipalities (CSM). 41 4. Justice . 46 5. Security Structures . 47 5.1. Police Structures . 47 5.2. Civil Protection . 48 6. Liaison Offi cers . 50 7. Energy . 50 8. Telecommunications. 53 9. EU Integration. 54 III) Infl uence and Persuasion . 54 4 FORUM • Policy Paper • 1/2015 IV) Challenges of Developing the Institutional Framework for Normalization . 56 a) Constitutionality, Legality and Legitimacy of the Brussels Agreements . 56 b) Improvement of Economic Conditions toward Normalization. 60 1. Macroeconomic Environment . 60 2. Infrastructural Environment. 62 2.1. Transportation . 62 2.2. Water and Wastewater Management, Land and Environment Management . 63 3. Telecommunications and Media. 65 4. Industry. 65 4.1. Energy . 65 4.2. Mining and Metal Processing Industry . 67 4.3. Engineering and Construction Industry . 67 4.4. Wood, Paper and Furniture Industry . 67 4.5. Textile Industry . 68 5. Agriculture and Animal Husbandry . 68 6. Tourism . 69 7. Foreign Trade and Exchange . 69 8. Labor Market . 70 9. Privatization . 70 10. Regional Cooperation. 73 V) Recommendations for the Normalization of Relations between Serbia and Kosovo. 74 VI) Annexes . 85 VII) Reference List . 126 PhD Dušan Janjić THE FRAMEWORK FOR THE NORMALIZATION OF SERBIA-KOSOVO RELATIONS Belgrade, September 2015 INTRODUCTION Th is Policy Paper points out: – Th e complexity of political and historical circumstances in which the Brussels Dialogue and normalization of Serbia-Kosovo relations are taking place; – Th e most decisive factors infl uencing the normalization of Serbia-Kosovo relations; – Interconnection between the processes of normalization and integration of Ser- bia and Kosovo into the European Union; – Achievements in the Brussels dialogue until August 2015; – Actions to be taken for the implementation of the agreements reached between Serbia and Kosovo, and – Policies, actions and measures to be taken for improving circumstances for nor- malization of relations. Aft er examining diff erent types of sources (analyses; articles in academic journals, newspapers and other publications; reports issued by relevant institutions, etc) about the Brussels dialogue and the normalization process, it appears that they give only par- tial insights, oft en neglecting the political, social and, in particular, security circum- stances in which the dialogue and the normalization process are taking place. A multidisciplinary approach was used in developing a methodological and thema- tic framework that enabled systematic and comprehensive analysis of the theme. Un- derstanding the complexity of the dialogue and normalization process also required consideration of all important themes. Th e Brussels dialogue is marked by a lack of transparency. Th erefore, diff erent sour- ces had to be considered in order to reconstruct all agreements reached and the proce- ss of their implementation. Readers of this Policy Paper can access the full text of all publically available agreements reached within the “Brussels Agreement”, in the Annexes. Th e author of this Policy Paper relied heavily on the fi ndings of the project “Con- sultative Discussions about the Institutional Solutions to the Issue of Relations Betwe- en Serbia and Kosovo“ (hereinaft er the KAS project), implemented through a series of consultative events organized by the Rule of Law Program South East Europe, Konrad- 6 FORUM • Policy Paper • 1/2015 Adenauer-Stift ung (KAS), Forum for Ethnic Relations (FER) and Kosovo Institute for Policy Research and Development (KIPRED) in: 1) Miločer-Montenegro (November 25-28, 2012); 2) Priština-Kosovo (April 18, 2013); 3) Niš-Serbia (25-26 June 2013), en- titled: “Normalization of relations between Belgrade and Priština: the fi rst anniversary of the Brussels Agreement“and Belgrade-Serbia (25 April 2014). Th is Policy Paper thus can be viewed as one of the KAS project outputs. One of the most important outputs of the KAS project is the “Basic/Framework Agree- ment between Serbia and Ko sovo” (hereinaft er: Framework Agreement). Th e Framework Agreement has been cited and used in this Policy Paper. Given the interest stirred within the Serbian public, the Fra mework Agreement is provided in its integral format (See: Annex 1). I) NORMALIZATION - THE PATH FROM CONFLICT TO A “EUROPEAN FUTURE” a) The Historical and Political Circumstances which Preceded the Brussels Dialogue Kosovo’s area is 10,908 km2 and it is populated by over two million people, of whom 82 percent are Albanians. It is an area where people and communities of diff e- rent ethnic backgrounds, cultures and religions live, work and clash with one another. Kosovo is marked by a distinctive process of ethnic homogenization, refl ected on a territory level by the concentration of ethnic minorities living in territorial enclaves1. Milošević’s regime tried to establish direct jurisdiction over Kosovo by restricting the rights of Albanians through a methodically pursued campaign for their marginali- zation, as well as discrimination and provision of social, economic and political “mo- tives“ for moving Albanians out of Kosovo. On the other hand, the Albanian leader Ibrahim Rugova and the Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) made an eff ort to achieve independence for the Republic of Kosovo by building institutions of the Albanian “pa- rallel state”. Th e war in Kosovo, which began on 28 February 1998, was yet another in the long line of armed confl icts waged on the soil of the former Yugoslavia. Th ese wars were part of the process of disintegration of the former Yugoslavia and the inception of new states. Th e war of 1998–1999 aggravated the unresolved pro blems from the past, and ad- ded the status of Kosovo as a new problem, including killings, dislodging and war de- vastation; further weakening of economy; the public sector in Kosovo is worse off af- ter the war than it was before (Maliqi, 2000: 26,27); opening up of the Albanian issue 1 There are around 130,000 Serbs in Kosovo today. They populate over 250 enclaves with Serbian-majority, distributed accross the northern, central and southeastern part of Kosovo. The largest concentration of Serb po- pulation is in northern Kosovo, where 59,000 Serbs comprise 45 percent of total Serb population in Kosovo. The Serbs who make numerical majority live south of the Ibar river in villages, in scattered rural settlements. (Mameli, 2007: 40). FORUM • Policy Paper • 1/2015 7 as both a regional issue and in terms of the possible unifi cation of Albanian territori- es, and the changing of internationally recognized borders of states. Milošević’s control over Kosovo came to the end in June 1999 with the arrival of UNMIK, under the control of the Special Representative of the UN Secrterary-General (hereinaft er: UNSG), thereby creating a “new reality” in Kosovo, while the UN Security Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dayton Accords and the Escalating Tensions in Kosovo
    Berkeley Undergraduate Journal 68 THE DAYTON ACCORDS AND THE ESCALATING TENSIONS IN KOSOVO By Christopher Carson Abstract his paper argues that the Dayton Accords, which ended the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, were the primary cause of the outbreak of violence in Kosovo in 1998. While the Accords were regarded as successful in neighboring Bosnia, the agreement failed to mention the Texisting situation in Kosovo, thus perpetuating the ethnic tensions within the region. Following the Dayton Accords, the response by the international community failed to address many concerns of the ethnically Albanian population living in Kosovo, creating a feeling of alienation from the international political scene. Finally, the Dayton Accords indirectly contributed to the collapse of the Albanian government in 1997, creating a shift in the structure of power in the region. This destabilization triggered the outbreak of war between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo the following year. The Dayton Accords 69 I. Introduction For many years, the territory of Kosovo functioned as an autonomous region within the state of Yugoslavia. During that time, Kosovo was the only Albanian-speaking territory within Yugoslavia, having been home to a significant Albanian population since its creation. The region also had a very important meaning for the Serb community, as it was the site of the Battle of Kosovo in 1389, which defined Serbian nationalism when Serbian forces were defeated by the Ottoman Empire. In the 1980s, tensions began to arise between the two communities, initially resulting in protests against the centralized government in Belgrade and arrests of Albanian Kosovars. Under the presidency of Slobodan Milošević, these ethnic tensions intensified both in Kosovo and elsewhere in Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponyms of Albania As Personal Names Among Kosovo Albanians
    Toponyms of Albania as personal names among Kosovo Albanians Bardh Rugova University of Prishtina, Kosovo Toponyms of Albania as personal names among Kosovo Albanians Abstract: This paper aims at analyzing the trend among Kosovo Albanians to create given names using toponyms of Albania in various social and political circumstances. The research is conducted from a sociolinguistic perspective. During the years of non-communication between Albania and Yugoslavia, Albanians in Kosovo have expressed their Albanian identity by naming their children using names of towns, provinces, islands and rivers from Albania. Data taken from birth registrars’ offices through the years show the Kosovar Albanians’ point of view towards the state of Albania. It reflects the symbolic role that Albania had/ has for Albanians beyond its geographical borders. Keywords: given names, identity, sociolinguistics, toponyms. This paper aims at analyzing the trend among Kosovo Albanians to give names to children using toponyms of Albania in various social and political circumstances. The research is conducted from the sociolinguistic perspective. During the years of severance of relations between Albania and Yugoslavia, Albanians in Yugoslavia, most of whom were inhabitants of Kosovo, have expressed their Albanian identity, inter alia, also by naming their children using town names of Albania (Vlora, Elbasan, Berat, Milot, Saranda), province names (Mirdita, Mat), river names (Drin, Drilon, Vjosa, Shkumbin, Erzen), island names (Sazan), the names of the two seas (Adriatic and Jon), and a mountain name (Tomor). The trend of giving such names reflects also the social context of Kosovo Albanians. In Albania1 such names have not been given at all, with few exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOLVING DISPUTES and BUILDING RELATIONS Challenges of Normalization Between Kosovo and Serbia
    Council CIG for Inclusive Governance RESOLVING DISPUTES AND BUILDING RELATIONS Challenges of Normalization between Kosovo and Serbia Contents 2 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 SUPPORTING THE BRUSSELS DIALOGUE 16 ESTABLISHING THE ASSOCIATION / COMMUNITY OF SERB-MAJORITY MUNICIPALITIES 24 KOSOVO’S NORTH INTEGRATION AND SERB POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 32 PARLIAMENTARY COOPERATION 39 COOPERATION ON EU INTEGRATION 41 PARTICIPANTS Albanian and Serbian translations of this publication are available on CIG’s website at cigonline.net. CIG Resolving Disputes anD BuilDing Relations Challenges of normalization between Kosovo and serbia Council for Inclusive Governance New York, 2015 PrefaCe anD AcknowleDgments Relations between Kosovo and Serbia are difficult. Since Kosovo’s declaration of independence in February 2008, all contacts between officials of Kosovo and Serbia ceased. Belgrade rejected any direct interaction with Pristina preferring to deal through the EU Rule of Law Mission and the UN Mission in Kosovo. However, encouraged by the EU and the US, senior officials of both governments met in March 2011 for direct talks in Brussels. These talks were followed in Brussels in October 2012 by a meeting between the prime ministers of Kosovo and Serbia. These EU-mediated dialogues resulted in a number of agreements between Serbia and Kosovo including the April 2013 Brussels Agreement. The Agreement’s main goal is to conclude the integration of the Serb-majority municipalities in Kosovo’s north into Kosovo’s system of laws and governance, including the establishment of the Association/Community of the Serb-Majority Municipalities in Kosovo. The sides also pledged not to block each other’s accession processes into the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008
    RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2008 RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30th June 2008 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON BIH.................................................................. 5 3 IDENTIFIED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ............................................................. 8 3-a Relevant institutions.......................................................................................................................................8 3-b Experts.............................................................................................................................................................9 3-c Relevant scientific publications ...................................................................................................................10 3-c-i) Birds...........................................................................................................................................................10 3-c-ii) Fish ........................................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iii) Mammals ...............................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iv)
    [Show full text]
  • Marx's Confrontation with Utopia Darren Webb Department of Politics
    In Search of the Spirit of Revolution: Marx's Confrontation with Utopia Darren Webb Department of Politics Thesis presented to the University of Sheffield for the degree of PhD, June 1998 Summary This thesis offers a sympathetic interpretation of Marx' s confrontation with Utopia. It begins by suggesting that Marx condemned utopianism as a political process because it undermined the principles of popular self-emancipation and self-determination, principles deemed by Marx to be fundamental to the constitution of any truly working­ class movement. As a means of invoking the spirit of revolution, it was therefore silly, stale and reactionary. With regards to Marx's own 'utopia', the thesis argues that the categories which define it were nothing more than theoretical by-products of the models employed by Marx in order to supersede the need for utopianism. As such, Marx was an 'Accidental Utopian'. Two conclusions follow from this. The first is that Marx's entire project was driven by the anti-utopian imperative to invoke the spirit of revolution in a manner consistent with the principles of popular self-emancipation and self-determination. The second is that, in spite of his varied attempts to do so, Marx was unable to capture the spirit of revolution without descending into utopianism himself Such conclusions do not, however, justify the claim that utopianism has a necessary role to play in radical politics. For Marx's original critique of utopianism was accurate and his failure to develop a convincing alternative takes nothing away from this. The accuracy of Marx's original critique is discussed in relation to the arguments put forward by contemporary pro-utopians as well as those developed by William Morris, Ernst Bloch and Herbert Marcuse.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Serb Engagement in Kosovo's Politics
    Serb Engagement in Kosovo’s Politics Introduction The Council for Inclusive Governance (CIG) organized on June 24, 2014 in Belgrade a roundtable for representatives of Kosovo Serb parties, Serbian parties, Serbian government officials, and a number of Serb analysts. The objective of the roundtable was to address the role of the newly elected Kosovo Serbs in Kosovo’s central institutions and to explore ways the Serb representatives could help to overcome obstacles at the local level, particularly in the north. The roundtable is part of a project on the normalization of Kosovo-Serbia relations and the integration of Kosovo’s north. The project is funded by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. Kosovo Serbs in the north took part in Kosovo’s parliamentary elections for the first time since Kosovo declared independence in 2008. Under the current legislative framework, Kosovo Serbs are guaranteed 10 seats in parliament and are entitled to lead two ministries, if Kosovo’s government has more than 12 ministries. The last government was working with 19 ministries. If the number is less than 12, the Kosovo Serbs are entitled to one ministerial position. The civic initiative Srpska Lista won nine of the 10 guaranteed seats in the June elections and includes also some members of the Independent Liberal Party, which was part of the government with three ministries in the last mandate. The remaining seat went to the Progressive Democratic Party. The Srpska Lista has the support of the Serbian government and is expected to act in close coordination with Belgrade. Some see this support as a contribution to better advance Kosovo Serb interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties of Kosovo Serbs in the Political System of Kosovo: from Pluralism to Monism JOVANA RADOSAVLJEVIĆ & BUDIMIR NIČIĆ 3
    1 NEW SOCIALINITIATIVE Political parties of Kosovo Serbs April in the political 2021 system of Kosovo: From pluralism to monism 2 Political parties of Kosovo Serbs in the political system of Kosovo: from pluralism to monism JOVANA RADOSAVLJEVIĆ & BUDIMIR NIČIĆ 3 Characteristics of the open society within Serb community in Kosovo Political Civil society parties of organizations in the Kosovo Serbs in Openness of Serbian Serbian community in the political system media in Kosovo Kosovo – Beteween of Kosovo: From perceptions and pluralism to presentation monism Attitudes of Kosovo Openness of institutions Community Rights in Serbs of security to the citizens of Kosovo Kosovo institutions Analysis of the Kosovo Serbs in the economic situation in dialogue process the Serb-populated areas in Kosovo Research title: Political parties of Kosovo Serbs in the political system of Kosovo: From pluralism to monism Published by: KFOS Prepared by: Nova društvena inicijativa (New Social Initiative) i Medija Centar (Media Center) Authors: Jovana Radosavljević, Budimir Ničić The original writing language of the analysis is Serbian language. Translated by: Biljana Simurdić Design: tedel Printed by (No. of copies): tedel (100) This paper is published within OPEN, a project carried out by the Kosovo Foundation for Open Society (KFOS) in cooperation with the organizations Nova društvena inicijativa (New Social Initiative) and Medija Centar (Media Center). Views expressed in this publication are exclusively those of the research authors and are not necessarily the views of KFOS. Year of publishing: 2021 CONTENT 05. WHO ARE 16 03. IMPORTANT PLAYERS AND POLITICAL PARTIES 9 WHAT ARE THEIR OF KOSOVO SERBS, ROLES FROM PLURALISM TO MONISM 01.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Political Economy Analysis Final Report
    KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 26, 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Management Systems International, A Tetra Tech Company. KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT December 26, 2017 IDIQ No. AID-167-I-17-00002 Award No: AID-167-TO-17-00009 Prepared by Management Systems International (MSI), A Tetra Tech Company 200 12th St South, Suite 1200 Arlington, VA, USA 22202 DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of the Management Systems International and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 II. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 7 A. Foundational Factors ........................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Rules
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • (MNEE) Dataset
    Montenegrin Elections (MNEE) dataset List of Abbreviations and Names of Parties and Coalitions Last updated: 11 March 2021 If you notice any issues or discrepancies or have questions regarding the table, please send an email to: [email protected] Table Election year Abrreviation Original name Notes and English translation If a party or (coalition partners information on coalition represents in brackets) sources (where a minority, which applicable) minority it represents? 1990 SKCG Savez komunista Crne Future dominant League of Gore party. In 1991 it was Communists of renamed into Montenegro Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS). 1990 SRSJCG (LSCG-SP- Savez reformskih Source: Adžić (2019). Alliance of Yugoslav PSCG-NOK-SNR- snaga Jugoslavije za Reformist Forces for SDSCG-DACG) Crnu Goru Montenegro 1990 LSCG Liberalni savez Crne Liberal Alliance of Gore Montenegro 1990 PSCG Partija socijalista Crne Party of Socialists Gore 1990 SP Socijalistička partija Socialist Party 1990 NOK Nezavisna orgazinacija Independent komunista Organization of Communists 1990 SNR Stranka nacionalne Party of National Bosniak ravnopravnosti Equality 1 1990 SDSCG Socijaldemokratska Not to be confused Social Democratic stranka Crne Gore with SDP (formed in Party of Montenegro 1993) or SDS (Serb Democratic Party)! 1990 DACG Demokratska Democratic alternativa Crne Gore Alternative of Montenegro 1990 DK (SDA-DSCG-SR) Demokratska koalicija Source: Pavićević Democratic coalition Bosniak and Albanian (2007, 25). (coalition, see notes) *details on the members of coalition in
    [Show full text]
  • THE WARP of the SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-Westernism, Russophilia, Traditionalism
    HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN SERBIA studies17 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism... BELGRADE, 2016 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism… Edition: Studies No. 17 Publisher: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia www.helsinki.org.rs For the publisher: Sonja Biserko Reviewed by: Prof. Dr. Dubravka Stojanović Prof. Dr. Momir Samardžić Dr Hrvoje Klasić Layout and design: Ivan Hrašovec Printed by: Grafiprof, Belgrade Circulation: 200 ISBN 978-86-7208-203-6 This publication is a part of the project “Serbian Identity in the 21st Century” implemented with the assistance from the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. CONTENTS Publisher’s Note . 5 TRANSITION AND IDENTITIES JOVAN KOMŠIĆ Democratic Transition And Identities . 11 LATINKA PEROVIĆ Serbian-Russian Historical Analogies . 57 MILAN SUBOTIĆ, A Different Russia: From Serbia’s Perspective . 83 SRĐAN BARIŠIĆ The Role of the Serbian and Russian Orthodox Churches in Shaping Governmental Policies . 105 RUSSIA’S SOFT POWER DR. JELICA KURJAK “Soft Power” in the Service of Foreign Policy Strategy of the Russian Federation . 129 DR MILIVOJ BEŠLIN A “New” History For A New Identity . 139 SONJA BISERKO, SEŠKA STANOJLOVIĆ Russia’s Soft Power Expands . 157 SERBIA, EU, EAST DR BORIS VARGA Belgrade And Kiev Between Brussels And Moscow . 169 DIMITRIJE BOAROV More Politics Than Business . 215 PETAR POPOVIĆ Serbian-Russian Joint Military Exercise . 235 SONJA BISERKO Russia and NATO: A Test of Strength over Montenegro .
    [Show full text]