DOCSLIB.ORG

(MNEE) Dataset

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Montenegrin Elections (MNEE) dataset List of Abbreviations and Names of Parties and Coalitions Last updated: 11 March 2021 If you notice any issues or discrepancies or have questions regarding the table, please send an email to: [email protected] Table Election year Abrreviation Original name Notes and English translation If a party or (coalition partners information on coalition represents in brackets) sources (where a minority, which applicable) minority it represents? 1990 SKCG Savez komunista Crne Future dominant League of Gore party. In 1991 it was Communists of renamed into Montenegro Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS). 1990 SRSJCG (LSCG-SP- Savez reformskih Source: Adžić (2019). Alliance of Yugoslav PSCG-NOK-SNR- snaga Jugoslavije za Reformist Forces for SDSCG-DACG) Crnu Goru Montenegro 1990 LSCG Liberalni savez Crne Liberal Alliance of Gore Montenegro 1990 PSCG Partija socijalista Crne Party of Socialists Gore 1990 SP Socijalistička partija Socialist Party 1990 NOK Nezavisna orgazinacija Independent komunista Organization of Communists 1990 SNR Stranka nacionalne Party of National Bosniak ravnopravnosti Equality 1 1990 SDSCG Socijaldemokratska Not to be confused Social Democratic stranka Crne Gore with SDP (formed in Party of Montenegro 1993) or SDS (Serb Democratic Party)! 1990 DACG Demokratska Democratic alternativa Crne Gore Alternative of Montenegro 1990 DK (SDA-DSCG-SR) Demokratska koalicija Source: Pavićević Democratic coalition Bosniak and Albanian (2007, 25). (coalition, see notes) *details on the members of coalition in three rows below 1990 SDA Stranka demokratske Party of Democratic Bosniak akcije za Crnu Goru Action for Montenegro 1990 SR Stranka Party of Equality Bosniak ravnopravnosti 1990 DSCG Demokratski savez u Democratic Alliance Albanian Crnoj Gori in Montenegro 1990 DHPS Demohrišćanska Ortodox Christian pravoslavna stranka Democratic Party 1990 DSSPCG Demokratski savez Democratic Alliance samostalnih of Independent privrednika Crne Enterpreuners of Gore Montenegro 1990 DS Demokratska stranka Democratic Party 1990 JNS Jugoslovenska Yugoslav People’s narodna stranka Party 1990 SSCG Socijalistički savez Socialist Alliance of Crne Gore Montenegro 2 1990 NK Lista nezavisnih List of Independent kandidata Candidates 1990 NS Narodna stranka People’s Party 1992 DPS Demokratska partija The dominant party. Democratic Party of socijalista Ruled from 1990 to Socialists 2020, with a slight interruption during 2001-2002 period (Liberal Alliance switched sides back then from supporting DPS to supporting opposition for preparing snap elections). 1992 SRS Srpska radikalna Serb Radical Party dr stranka dr Vojislav Vojislav Seselj Šešelj 1992 SDPR Socijaldemokratska Social Democratic partija reformista Party of Reformists 1992 DO (DS-DSSP-NDS- Demokratska Source: Knežević and Democratic SDS) opozicija (Demokratska Bošković (1992). opposition (Democratic stranka, Demokratski Party, Democratic savez samostalnih Alliance of Independent privrednika, Narodna Enterpreuners, People’s demokratska stranka, Democratic Party, Serb Srpska demokratska Democratic Party of stranka CG) Montenegro) 1992 SKPJ Savez komunista - Alliance of Pokret za Jugoslaviju Communists – u Crnoj Gori Movement for Yugoslavia in Montenegro 3 1992 SNO Srpska narodna Serb People’s Renewal obnova za Crnu Goru for Montenegro and i Hercegovinu Herzegovina 1992 SPCG Socijalisticka partija Socialist Party of Crne Gore Montenegro 1992 UR9192 Udruženje ratnika ’91- Alliance of Soldiers '92 from 1991-1992 period (unsure about exact translation) 1992 DHPS Demohrišćanska Ortodox Christian pravoslavna stranka Democratic Party 1992 SDSCG Socijaldemokratska Social Democratic stranka Crne Gore Party of Montenegro 1992 DL Grupa građana Group of citizens ‘Demokratska ljevica’ Democratic Left – – humanizam i Humanism and tehnički progres Technical Progress 1992 SOPCG Srpski otadžbinski Serb Motherland pokret Movement* 1992 KPJCG Komunistička partija Communist Party of Jugoslavije u Crnoj Yugoslavia in Gori Montenegro 1992 NKPJ Novi komunistički New Communist pokret Jugoslavije Movement of Yugoslavia 1992 DUA Demokratska unija Democratic Union of Albanian Albanaca - Unioni Albanians Demokratik i Shqipëtarëve 1992 CFP Crnogorski Montenegrin federalistički pokret Federalist Movement 4 1992 EPCG Ekološki pokret Crne Enviromental Gore Movement of Montenegro 1996 SDP Socijaldemokratska SDP formed as a Social Democratic partija result of a merger of Party two parties in 1993: SDPR and SPCG. Source: Vukićević and Vujović (2012, 67). 1996 SS (SSS-SSJCG) Srpski savez Abbreviation “SS” Serb Alliance appears in official report by REC as well. Source on coalition partners: Pobjeda (1996). SSS Srpska saborna Serb (?) Party stranka *unsure about translation of word “saborna” in this context SSJCG Stranka srpskog Party of Serb Unity jedinstva za Crnu for Montenegro Goru 1996 SRS Srpska radikalna Serb Radical Party of stranka Crne Gore Montenegro 1996 SZSCG Stranka zaštite štednih Party for protection uloga, socijalne i of savings, social and pravne sigurnosti legal security 1996 JULCG Jugoslovenska levica u Yugoslav Left in Crnoj Gori Montenegro 1996 SPZCG Stranka prirodnoga Party of the Natural zakona Crne Gore Law of Montenegro 5 1996 SSP Stranka socijalne Party of Social Justice pravde 1996 KCG Komunisti Crne Gore Communist of (SK-PJ, Savez Montenegro (Alliance komunista, Demokratska of Communists – komunistička partija CG, Movement for YU, Novi komunistički pokret Democratic Communist Jugoslavije) Party of Montenegro, New Communist Movement of YU) 1996 GGSS Lista grupe građana Citizen’s list “Seventh “Sedma sila” power” 1996 SNP Socijalisticka narodna Socialist People’s partija (Momir Party (Momir Bulatovic) Bulatovic)* split from DPS 1996 KPJCG Komunistička partija Yugoslav Communist Jugoslavije Party 1996 SDS Srpska demokratska Serb Democratic stranka Crne Gore Party in Montenegro 1996 EPCG Ekološki pokret Crne Enviromental Gore Movement of Montenegro 1996 SNR Stranka nacionalne Party of National Bosniak ravnopravnosti Equality 1997 (Presidential) OS Otadžbinska stranka Source: Monitor (1997). Motherland’s Party 1998 SNS Srpska narodna Created after 1997 Serb People’s Party – stranka – Dr Bozidar split in NS. Merged Dr Bozidar Bojovic Bojovic with NOVA in 2009. Source: Vukićević and Vujović (2012, 67). 6 1998 SDA Stranka demokratske Party of Democratic Bosniak akcije za Crnu Goru Action 1998 SKJ-KCG Savez komunista Paty, not coalition. Alliance of Jugoslavije – Result of a merger of Communists of Komunisti Crne Gore three communist Yugoslavia – organisations. Source: Communists of Pobjeda (1998) Montenegro 1998 ZS (OS-SDS) Savez “Za srpstvo” Source: Pobjeda (1998) Alliance “For Serbdom” 1998 OS Otadžbinska stranka Motherland’s Party 1998 SDS Srpska demokratska Serb Democratic stranka Party 1998 SDevSCG Stranka deviznih Party of Foreign štediša Crne Gore Currency Savers of Montenegro 1998 SNRSCG Srpska narodna Serb People’s Radical radikalna stranka Crne Party of Montenegro Gore 1998 LBM (IDU-SNR) Lista udruženih List of united Bosniak Bošnjaka-Muslimana Bosniaks-Muslims 1998 IDU Internacionalna International Bosniak demokratska unija Democratic Union 1998 SNR Stranka nacionalne Party of National Bosniak ravnopravnosti Equality 1998 PLJP Partija ljudskog puta Party of Human Path 1998 SZSSS Stranka zaštite Party for protection stedišnih uloga i of savings and social socijalne sigurnosti security of citizens of građana Crne Gore Montenegro 1998 SNS Srpska narodna Serb People’s Party stranka 7 2001 BMDKCG (SDA- Bošnjačko- Bosniak-Muslim Bosniak INU-SNR) muslimanska Democratic Coalition demokratska koalicija in Montengro u Crnoj Gori 2001 SDA Stranka demokratske Party of Democratic Bosniak akcije Action 2001 INU Internacionalna International Bosniak demokratska unija Democratic Union 2001 SNR Stranka nacionalne Party of National ravnopravnosti Equality 2001 NSS Narodna socijalisticka People’s Socialist stranka – Momir Party – Momir Bulatović Bulatovic 2001 KIRP Komunisticke I Communist and radnicke partije – za Workers’ Parties – for Jugoslaviju I vlast Yugoslavia and the radnicke klase rule of working class 2001 PDP Partija demokratskog Party of Democratic prosperiteta - Osman Prosperity – Osman Redža Redza 2001 LDP Liberalno Source: Pobjeda (2001). Liberal Democratic demokratska partija Party of Montenegro Crne Gore 2001 NSCG Dr Novak Kilibarda – Not to be confused Dr Novak Kilibarda – Narodna sloga Crne with 1996 People’s People’s Unity of Gore Unity (LSCG+NS). Montenegro 2001 PKZJ Patriotska koalicija za Patriotic Coalition for Jugoslaviju (NSS-SRS- Yugoslavia (NSS-SRS- JUL-SDSCG) JUL-SDSCG) 2001 SDevSCG Stranka deviznih To avoid confusion Party of foreign štediša Crne Gore with Social currency savers Democratic Party 8 (SDSCG) from 1990 and 1992, abbreviation consists of three additional letters from the word “deviznih” (Dev instead of just D). 2001 SPZCG Stranka prirodnog Party of Natural Law zakona 2001 SZSSS Stranka zaštite štednih Party for protection uloga i socijalne of savings and social sigurnosti građana security of citizens of Crne Gore Montenegro 2002 BDKHH (IDU-BDS) Bošnjačka Source: OSCE report Bosniak Democratic Bosniak demokratska koalicija on Parliamentary Coalition – Harun – Harun Hadžić elections, 2002. Hadzic Important note: OSCE report indicates that two more parties were a member of this coalition, although not which two exactly. IDU Internacionalna International Bosniak demokratska unija Democratic Union BDS Bošnjački demokratski Bosniak Democratic Bosniak
Recommended publications
  • Political Parties of Kosovo Serbs in the Political System of Kosovo: from Pluralism to Monism JOVANA RADOSAVLJEVIĆ & BUDIMIR NIČIĆ 3

    Political Parties of Kosovo Serbs in the Political System of Kosovo: from Pluralism to Monism JOVANA RADOSAVLJEVIĆ & BUDIMIR NIČIĆ 3

    1 NEW SOCIALINITIATIVE Political parties of Kosovo Serbs April in the political 2021 system of Kosovo: From pluralism to monism 2 Political parties of Kosovo Serbs in the political system of Kosovo: from pluralism to monism JOVANA RADOSAVLJEVIĆ & BUDIMIR NIČIĆ 3 Characteristics of the open society within Serb community in Kosovo Political Civil society parties of organizations in the Kosovo Serbs in Openness of Serbian Serbian community in the political system media in Kosovo Kosovo – Beteween of Kosovo: From perceptions and pluralism to presentation monism Attitudes of Kosovo Openness of institutions Community Rights in Serbs of security to the citizens of Kosovo Kosovo institutions Analysis of the Kosovo Serbs in the economic situation in dialogue process the Serb-populated areas in Kosovo Research title: Political parties of Kosovo Serbs in the political system of Kosovo: From pluralism to monism Published by: KFOS Prepared by: Nova društvena inicijativa (New Social Initiative) i Medija Centar (Media Center) Authors: Jovana Radosavljević, Budimir Ničić The original writing language of the analysis is Serbian language. Translated by: Biljana Simurdić Design: tedel Printed by (No. of copies): tedel (100) This paper is published within OPEN, a project carried out by the Kosovo Foundation for Open Society (KFOS) in cooperation with the organizations Nova društvena inicijativa (New Social Initiative) and Medija Centar (Media Center). Views expressed in this publication are exclusively those of the research authors and are not necessarily the views of KFOS. Year of publishing: 2021 CONTENT 05. WHO ARE 16 03. IMPORTANT PLAYERS AND POLITICAL PARTIES 9 WHAT ARE THEIR OF KOSOVO SERBS, ROLES FROM PLURALISM TO MONISM 01.
  • Kosovo Political Economy Analysis Final Report

    Kosovo Political Economy Analysis Final Report

    KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 26, 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Management Systems International, A Tetra Tech Company. KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT December 26, 2017 IDIQ No. AID-167-I-17-00002 Award No: AID-167-TO-17-00009 Prepared by Management Systems International (MSI), A Tetra Tech Company 200 12th St South, Suite 1200 Arlington, VA, USA 22202 DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of the Management Systems International and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 II. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 7 A. Foundational Factors ........................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Rules
  • Southeastern Europe

    Southeastern Europe

    U.S. ONLINE TRAINING FOR OSCE, INCLUDING REACT Module 5. Southeastern Europe This module introduces you to southeastern Europe and the OSCE’s work in: • Croatia (The OSCE Office in Zagreb was closed in 2012) • Macedonia • Bosnia-Herzegovina • Serbia • Kosovo • Montenegro • Albania . 1 Table of Contents Overview. 3 Geography. 4 People. 6 Former Yugoslavia. 10 World War I. 11 World War II. 12 Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia. 14 Post-Tito. 15 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 17 Croatia. 18 Key information. 19 Historical background. 20 During Tito. 21 After Tito. 22 War of independence. 23 Domestic politics. 25 Macedonia. 35 Key information. 36 Historical background. 38 19th and early 20th centuries. 39 During Tito. 41 Independence. 43 Domestic politics. 44 Prospects and challenges. 67 Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH). 72 Key information. 73 Historical background. 75 During the Tito era. 76 The Bosnian war: 1992-1995. 79 Disunity of international community. 81 The Dayton Peace Accords, 1995. 84 Politics since Dayton. 87 Challenges and pressures. 95 Serbia. 99 Key information. 100 Introduction. 101 Contemporary Serbia. 102 Miloševi?'s rise. 104 Domestic resistance and state oppression. 106 Consequences of Kosovo. 109 The short-lived Kosovo Verification Mission. 110 MODULE 5. Southeastern Europe 2 Regime repression intensifies. 112 Struggle for Serbia’s political direction. 115 Nikolic wins 2012 presidential election. 122 Serbia's identity and its vision for the future. 124 Montenegro. 131 Key information. 132 Contemporary Montenegro. 133 Politics in Montenegro. 134 Other issues. 140 Kosovo. 142 Key information. 143 Historical background of Kosovo. 144 Organized non-violence. 145 After Dayton. 147 UNMIK established.
  • Kosovo: the Challenge of Transition

    Kosovo: the Challenge of Transition

    KOSOVO: THE CHALLENGE OF TRANSITION Europe Report N°170 – 17 February 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. THE STATE OF PLAY ................................................................................................. 1 A. THE PROCESS SO FAR............................................................................................................1 1. Ahtisaari’s room for manoeuvre................................................................................1 2. Finding the core of the process..................................................................................2 B. UNMIK’S SCORESHEET: KOSOVO AT GROUND LEVEL .........................................................3 1. Standards....................................................................................................................3 2. The political system...................................................................................................4 3. The economy and institutions....................................................................................5 4. Policing......................................................................................................................6 5. Inter-ethnic relations and security..............................................................................7 II. THE PROTAGONISTS ............................................................................................... 10 A. THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY .....................................................................................10
  • Montenegro Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects Of

    Montenegro Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects Of

    Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects of European Transformation in the Countries Targeted by EU Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policies Montenegro Jelena Džankiü Jadranka Kaluÿeroviü, Ivana Vojinoviü, Ana Krsmanoviü, Milica Dakoviü, Gordana Radojeviü, Ivan Jovetiü, Vojin Goluboviü, Mirza Muleškoviü, Milika Mirkoviü, ISSP – Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognosis Bosiljka Vukoviü June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION PROCESS IN MONTENEGRO ............. 4 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 5 1.2 The Creation of Democratic Institutions and Their Functioning ............................. 7 1.2.1 Political institutions in Montenegro throughout history: the effect of political traditions on the development of democratic institutions................................................ 7 1.2.2 The constitutional establishment of Montenegro .......................................... 12 1.2.3 Observations ................................................................................................ 26 1.3 The Implementation of the EU’s Democratic Requirements................................. 27 1.3.1 Transparency ............................................................................................... 27 1.3.2 Decision-making processes .......................................................................... 29 1.3.3 Minority rights............................................................................................
  • Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This Page Intentionally Left Blank POLITICAL HISTORY of the BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi

    Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This Page Intentionally Left Blank POLITICAL HISTORY of the BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi

    The Balkan Peninsula has played a crucial role in human history many times. The region framed the 20th century. The end of the Political History of the Balkans Cold War also had a significant effect on the region as it resulted (1989–2018) in bloody wars, economic collapse and complicated political transitions. The 2000s and 2010s opened the way towards EU membership, as many countries received candidate status and launched accession negotiations – however, this process has recently been facing obstacles. Political History This volume provides a general overview of the Post-Cold War history of the Balkans and explores the dynamics behind these tremendous changes ranging from democratic transitions to EU prospects. The authors describe the transitional period, the evolution of the political system and highlight the most important of the Balkans political developments in each country in the region. We recommend this book to those who seek a deeper insight into the recent history of the Balkans and a deeper understanding of its political developments. (1989–2018) POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE BALKANS (1989—2018) POLITICAL HISTORY The work was created in commission of the National University of Public Service under the priority project PACSDOP-2.1.2-CCHOP-15-2016-00001 entitled “Public Service Development Establishing Good Governance”. Zoltán Egeresi (eds.): Egeresi Zoltán — József Dúró József Edited by JÓZSEF DÚRÓ European Social Fund ZOLTÁN EGERESI INVESTING IN YOUR FUTURE Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This page intentionally left blank POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi Dialóg Campus Budapest, 2020 The work was created in commission of the National University of Public Service under the priority project PACSDOP-2.1.2-CCHOP-15-2016-00001 entitled “Public Service Development Establishing Good Governance”.
  • Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies

    Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies

    Identity and Agency: Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies Benjamin P. McClelland Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Benjamin P. McClelland All Rights Reserved Abstract Identity and Agency: Majority and Minority Ethnic Voting in New Democracies Benjamin P. McClelland This dissertation examines how ethnic identities are politicized through elections in new democracies. Using the cases of post-communist Latvia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, I compare the electoral success of campaigns which appeal to voters on the basis of ethnicity to those do not. I argue that ethnic parties are most likely in groups for whom two conditions are met. First, ethnicity must meaningfully differentiate ethnic insiders from outsiders, in such a way that voters will believe policy benefits will likely result from political representation for the group. Second, electoral institutions must ensure that the political mobilization of the group will result in electoral victory. These two conditions create fundamentally different incentives for ethnic majority groups and ethnic minority groups simply because of differences in group size. In most democracies with a large minority population, ethnic voting will be more likely among the majority group than the minority group, unless institutions encourage minority group voting by lowering barriers to entry. The results demonstrate the qualitatively different ways groups use ethnic identities as a resource to achieve political objectives, with important implications for minority group representation, political participation, and democratic governance in diverse societies. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Why Study Ethnic Voting? .
  • Kosovo Status: Delay Is Risky

    Kosovo Status: Delay Is Risky

    KOSOVO STATUS: DELAY IS RISKY Europe Report N°177 – 10 November 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. THE STATUS EQUATION........................................................................................... 1 A. AHTISAARI’S WORK...............................................................................................................2 B. FUTURE INTERNATIONAL PRESENCE .......................................................................................7 1. The International Community Representative..............................................................7 2. The EU Rule-of-Law Mission.....................................................................................9 3. Transition..................................................................................................................11 II. ON THE GROUND ...................................................................................................... 12 A. ALBANIANS ........................................................................................................................12 1. Management of the negotiations................................................................................12 2. Status expectations....................................................................................................13 3. Ground-level politics.................................................................................................15 B. SERBS .................................................................................................................................16
  • English Version Remains the Only Official Document

    English Version Remains the Only Official Document

    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights MONTENEGRO EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 29 March 2009 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 10 June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................... 3 III. POLITICAL CONTEXT.......................................................................................................................... 3 IV. ELECTION SYSTEM AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 4 A. ELECTION SYSTEM AND GENERAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 4 B. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR VOTING .......................................................................................................... 6 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................................... 7 A. STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ............................................................ 7 B. ORGANIZATION OF ELECTIONS ................................................................................................................ 8 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION ...................................................................................................................... 9 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION............................................................................................................11
  • EU Accession, NATO Membership, the Privatisation Process

    EU Accession, NATO Membership, the Privatisation Process

    Südosteuropa 56 (2008), H. 3, S. 418-423 KOSOVOS UNABHÄNGIGKEIT AUS DER SICHT DER NACHBARN KENNETH MORRISON Montenegro’s Kosovo Crisis Abstract. Montenegro’s recognition of Kosovo in October 2008 precipitated a political crisis. Prior to recognition, both internal and external factors had contributed to an increasing tension that pressed for a decision on the issue. With the Serb community in Montenegro still coming to terms with the country’s break from Serbia in 2006, it heavily opposed a recognition of Kosovo. The Albanian community, on the other hand, well integrated and loyal to the Montenegrin state, perceived an unnecessary delay in the act of recognition. The U.S., the U.K. and the EU exercised considerable pressure on the Montenegrin government. Yet regional relations, above all with Serbia, had been stable for some time. Montenegro chose to recognize Kosovo in the immediate aftermath of its support for Serbia’s appeal to the UN General Assembly, arguing with the need to acknowledge political realities. The decision was followed by violent riots. Yet, as the article demonstrates, the recognition not only helped the Montenegrin government gain the favour of international powers, but also served to set off political dynamics within the country, which may prove advantageous to the present government of Milo Djukanović in the upcoming elections of September 2009. Kenneth Morrison is Lecturer in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics at Birkbeck College, Uni- versity of London. The Montenegrin government’s decision to formally recognise Kosovo’s in- dependence in October threw the republic into a political crisis. Montenegro’s government has a number of pressing priorities to attend to – EU accession, NATO membership, the privatisation process, and attempts to attract invest- ment for infrastructural and energy projects – but none has thus far presented a challenge that equates with the problem of Kosovo.
  • YOUTH INITIATIVE for HUMAN RIGHTS INICIJATIVA MLADIH ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA NISMA E TË RINJVE PËR TË DREJTAT E NJERIUT Contents Introduction

    YOUTH INITIATIVE for HUMAN RIGHTS INICIJATIVA MLADIH ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA NISMA E TË RINJVE PËR TË DREJTAT E NJERIUT Contents Introduction

    2017. JANUARYJUNE YOUTH INITIATIVE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INICIJATIVA MLADIH ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA NISMA E TË RINJVE PËR TË DREJTAT E NJERIUT contents introduction Anita MITIć, Director We live in the introduction Dear readers, partners and friends, It is always a great pleasure to share a semi-annual newsletter with you, and briefly summarize tion for years. In addition, we noted a constant threat to this dialogue by rightists and hooligan what we did in the previous, very dynamic, six months. groups which interrupt events important for mutual understanding between the two societies. It seems that the first half of 2017 represents an introduction to long-term social and political It’s a big mistake to ignore the dialogue that has been going on for years in both Serbian so- processes in Serbia and the region. The rapid rise of extreme-nationalist groups and organi- ciety and between civil society representatives from Serbia and Kosovo. It’s necessary to con- zations and the radicalization of their actions is galloping, with the only obstacle in the form of tinue building the relations between the two societies based on the values that for years have peacekeeping organizations that oppose them. The state doesn’t care, the Minister of Internal been the basis of the connection and the existing dialogue: peace, mutual understanding and Affairs calls those who protest against the panels with war criminals as main speakers fascists, trust building. The priority obligation of the state must be to provide protection and security to and the Minister of Culture develops special relations with the organization that organizes the individuals and organizations who are the pioneers of this dialogue events where Miroljub Petrović speaks.
  • Policy Paper 2015 ENG-B5

    Policy Paper 2015 ENG-B5

    | FORUM ZA ETNIČKE ODNOSE FORUM FOR ETHNIC RELATIONSELAELATIONS Normalization Challenges PhD DUŠAN JANJIĆ FORUM ZA ETNIČKE ODNOSE FORUM FOR ETHNIC RELATIONS 1 2015 PhD DUŠAN JANJIĆ Normalization Challenges Analysis of the Negotiation Process and Implementation of the Brussels Agreement Belgrade, 2015. NORMALIZATION CHALLENGES ANALYSIS OF THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BRUSSELS AGREEMENT Belgrade, November 2015 Kraljice Natalije 45/VII 11000 Beograd, Srbija +381 11 36 20 804 [email protected] • www.fer.org.rs This publication is the result of the activities carried out on the project “Consultations on Normalization of Kosovo-Serbian-Relations”, which was realized from 2013 until 2015. The project was supported by KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG, offi ce in Belgrade, www.kas.de/serbien. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG, offi ce in Belgrade. CONTENTS Introduction. 5 I) Normalization – the Path from Confl ict to a “European Future” . 6 a) The Historical and Political Circumstances which Preceded the Brussels dialogue. 6 b) Normalization – the Way toward a Possible Solution . 11 II) Brussels Agreement . 20 a) Technical Agreements . 21 1. Freedom of Movement . 22 2. Integrated Border Management (IBM) . 26 3. Customs Revenue Collection and Customs Stamps . 28 4. Interim Fund for Economic and Infrastructural Development of Northern Kosovo 30 5. Civil Registry Books. 31 6. Cadastral Records . 32 7. University Diplomas . 32 8. Regional Representation and Cooperation . 34 b) First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalization of Relations . 34 1. Law on Amnesty. 38 2. Municipal Elections and Inauguration of Local Authorities .