DOCSLIB.ORG

Fire Station No. 9 Replacement Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fire Station No. 9 Replacement Project Fire Station No. 9 Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by City of Long Beach Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 3rd Floor Long Beach, California 90802 Contact: Maryanne Cronin, Planner prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 E 1st Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90012 July 2020 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. Environmental Scientists | Planners | Engineers rinconconsultants.com Fire Station No. 9 Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by City of Long Beach Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 3rd Floor Long Beach, California 90802 Contact: Maryanne Cronin, Planner prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. st 250 E 1 Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90012 July 2020 Draft Environmental Impact Report i City of Long Beach Fire Station No. 9 Replacement Project This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content. ii Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Synopsis .........................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Objectives and Benefits .................................................................................................ES-2 Project Benefits.............................................................................................................ES-3 Required Project Approvals .......................................................................................................ES-3 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ES-4 Areas of Known Controversy and Issues to be Resolved ........................................................ ES-14 Project Alternatives ................................................................................................................ ES-15 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Overview of the Proposed Project .................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ....................................................... 1-1 1.3 Agency Roles and Intended Uses of this EIR ................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Scope and Content of this EIR ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Notice of Preparation ...................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 EIR Processing ................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.7 Draft EIR Comments ........................................................................................................ 1-6 2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Project Proponent ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Lead Agency Contact Person ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Site Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.1 Land Use Designation and Zoning .................................................................. 2-4 2.4.2 Surrounding Land Uses ................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.3 Existing Conditions and Historic Use .............................................................. 2-4 2.4.4 Site Investigations ........................................................................................... 2-6 2.5 Project Characteristics .................................................................................................. 2-10 2.5.1 Proposed Project Activities ........................................................................... 2-10 2.5.2 Project Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-14 2.5.3 Project Benefits............................................................................................. 2-14 2.6 Required Approvals ....................................................................................................... 2-14 2.7 Regulatory Compliance Measures ................................................................................ 2-15 3 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Regional Setting .............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Project Site Setting .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Cumulative Development ............................................................................................... 3-3 4 Environmental Impact Analysis .................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 4.1-1 4.1.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.1-1 4.1.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.1-3 4.1.3 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.1-6 4.2 Cultural, Paleontological, and Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................. 4.2-1 4.2.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.2-1 Draft Environmental Impact Report i City of Long Beach Fire Station No. 9 Replacement Project 4.2.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.2-7 4.2.3 Impact Analysis .......................................................................................... 4.2-11 4.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy ....................................................................... 4.3-1 4.3.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.3-1 4.3.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.3-3 4.3.3 Impact Analysis .......................................................................................... 4.3-11 4.4 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................... 4.4-1 4.4.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.4-1 4.4.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.4-8 4.4.3 Impact Analysis .......................................................................................... 4.4-13 4.5 Noise ............................................................................................................................ 4.5-1 4.5.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.5-1 4.5.1 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.5-7 4.5.2 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.5-8 5 Effects Found Not to be Significant ............................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Aesthetics ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ................................................................................ 5-2 5.3 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................ 5-3 5.4 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................ 5-4 5.5 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 5-5 5.6 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................... 5-7 5.7 Mineral Resources .......................................................................................................... 5-7 5.8 Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 5-8 5.9 Public Services ................................................................................................................. 5-8 5.10 Recreation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leonardoelectronicalma
    / ____ / / /\ / /-- /__\ /______/____ / \ ________________________________________________________________ Leonardo Electronic Almanac volume 11, number 9, September 2003 ________________________________________________________________ ISSN #1071-4391 ____________ | | | CONTENTS | |____________| ________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL --------- < Art and Weightlessness: The MIR Campaign 2003 in Star City, by Annick Bureaud > FEATURES -------- < Art and Weightlessness: The MIR Campaign 2003 in Star City, by Annick Bureaud > < The Multidisciplinary Research Laboratory, by Nicola Triscott > < An Artist in Space - An Achievable Goal?, by Rob LaFrenais > < Projekt Atol Flight Operations and the MIR Network, by Marko Peljhan > < Contextualizing Zero-Gravity Art, by Roger Malina > < Art Critic in Microgravity, by Annick Bureaud > < May the Force Be with You, by Alex Adriaansens > < Transpermia - Dédalo Project, by Marcel.lí Antúnez Roca > < Open Sky and Microgravity, by Ewen Chardronnet > < Initial Report on the Pilot Study on the Military and Behavioral Preconditions for Permanent Habitation in Microgravity, by The Otolith Group (Kodwo Eshun, Richard Couzins, Anjalika Sagar) > < Filming in Microgravity, by Richard Couzins > < Kaplegraf 0g (Drops Orbits), by Vadim Fishkin, Livia Páldi > < The Celestial Vault, by Stefan Gec > LEONARDO REVIEWS ---------------- < Consciousness Reframed 2003: Art and Consciousness in the Post-Biological Era, Reviewed by Pia Tikka > < Coded Characters: Media Art by Jill Scott, Reviewed
    [Show full text]
  • Keywords Studios 2019 Annual Report
    Keywords Studios plc Studios Keywords Annual Report Annual Report and Accounts 2019 and Accounts 2019 Building our platform for growth Keywords Studios plc Overview Strategic report Annual Report and Accounts 2019 Pages 1–6 Pages 8–44 Highlights 1 Q&A with Andrew Day 8 At a glance 2 Chief Executive’s review 10 Investment summary 4 Market outlook 16 Chairman’s statement 6 Business model 18 Our strategy 22 Service line review 24 Our people, our culture 28 KPIs 34 Financial and operating review 36 Responsible Business report 40 Board engagement with our stakeholders 43 Principal risks and uncertainties 45 2019 Highlights Our vision is to be the world’s leading technical and creative services platform for the video games industry and beyond. At Keywords Studios (Keywords), we are using our passion for games, technology and media to create a global services platform. In 2019, we delivered strong growth as we invested in a strengthened and more diversified services platform. Alternative performance measures* The Group reports certain Alternative performance measures (APMs) to present the financial performance of the business which are not GAAP measures as defined by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Management believes these measures provide valuable additional information for the users of the financial information to understand the underlying trading performance of the business. In particular, adjusted profit measures are used to provide the users of the accounts a clear understanding of the underlying profitability of the business over time. For full definitions and explanations of these measures and a reconciliation to the most directly referenceable IFRS line item, please see pages 135 to 143.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Guide a Tour of Metro’S Artwork Metro Commissions Artists to Create Engaging and Thought-Provoking Artworks to Make Your Journey More Inviting and Pleasurable
    metro.net Art Guide A tour of Metro’s artwork Metro commissions artists to create engaging and thought-provoking artworks to make your journey more inviting and pleasurable. The artworks weave a multi-layered cultural tapestry that mirrors Los Angeles County’s rich contemporary and popular cultures. Established in 1989, the Metro Art program has commissioned over 250 artists for a wide variety of both temporary and permanent projects. explore Artists are selected through a peer review process with community input; all works are created especially for their transit related sites. This guide is intended to help you discover artworks throughout the Metro system. For more detailed information on the artwork and the artists, please visit metro.net/art. Artwork copyrighted, all rights reserved. Metro Lines and Transitways Metro Contents Art’s a Trip. Art’s a Trip Metro Environments Free Metro Rail Tours Tours are o=ered the >rst Saturday, > Thursdays – Meet at 7pm at Sunday and Thursday of each month. the street level entrance to the Metro Rail Metro Customer Center It’s free. It’s provocative. The tours are roundtrip and last Hollywood/Highland Metro l Metro Red Line Metro Vehicles It’s a great ride. approximately two hours. Rail Station. Union Station Bus Plaza l Metro Purple Line Tours for groups of 15 or more are > Saturdays – Meet at 10am at > Each tour is unique, visits l Metro Gold Line Metro Headquarters available by special arrangement. the street level entrance to the di=erent stations and is led Metro Division 3 Hollywood/Highland Metro by a member of the Metro Art l Metro Blue Line Call 213 .922.2738 for information Rail Station.
    [Show full text]
  • LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BID TABULATION Bid No: OP33673069 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BID TABULATION Bid No: OP33673069 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services Bids Out: 02/14/13 Total 15 Bids Opened: 03/21/13 Total 6 Lincoln Training Center Diversified Landscape Co. Woods Maintenance Service, Inc. Advertisement Date(s): 02/14/13 Newspaper: LA Daily News FACILITY/LOCATION 36 MONTH BASE A. BUS DIVISIONS, TERMAINALS AND LAYOVER LOTS MONTHLY MONTHLY MONTHLY SAN FERNANDO $535.25 $444.00 $1,506.00 SAN GABRIEL VAL $540.50 $888.00 $1,506.00 DIVISION 1 $1,635.75 $1,110.00 $4,438.00 DIVISION 2 $420.79 $444.00 $1,163.00 DIVISION 3 $357.27 $333.00 $986.00 DIVISION 4 $325.95 $888.00 $889.00 DIVISION 5 $335.35 $1,332.00 $1,035.00 DIVISION 6 $219.36 $444.00 $617.00 DIVISION 7 $239.36 $444.00 $655.00 DIVISION 8 $375.98 $1,332.00 $1,026.00 DIVISION 9 $170.25 $888.00 $479.00 DIVISION 10 $646.50 $2,664.00 $1,751.00 DIVISION 12 $175.80 $666.00 $493.00 DIVISION 15 $1,300.00 $2,220.00 $3,558.00 TERMINAL 17 $197.25 $222.00 $547.00 DIVISION 18 $645.85 $1,554.00 $1,751.00 TERMINAL 19 $1,235.55 $222.00 $3,354.00 TERMINAL 26 $180.00 $222.00 $506.00 TERMINAL 27 $190.00 $222.00 $533.00 LOCATION 30 $2,479.59 $444.00 $6,735.00 LOCATION 31 $170.95 $222.00 $479.00 TERMINAL 37 $105.27 $222.00 $288.00 TERMINAL 38 $257.39 $222.00 $711.00 TERMINAL 39 $174.95 $222.00 $479.00 TERMINAL 40 $629.36 $222.00 $1,711.00 TERMINAL 42 $238.07 $222.00 $657.00 TERMINAL 44 $340.75 $222.00 $932.00 TERMINAL 45 $192.75 $222.00 $531.00 TERMINAL 47 $388.29 $222.00 $1,058.00 LOCATION 53 $335.36 $222.00 $889.00 LAYOVER LOT $270.40 $222.00 $751.00 BUS DIVISIONS MONTHLY SUBTOTAL $15,309.89 (A) $19,425.00 (A) $42,014.00 (A) FACILITY/LOCATION MONTHLY MONTHLY MONTHLY B.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1 . See, for example, Mitsuhiro Yoshimoto’s review article “Anime from Akira to Princess Mononoke: Experiencing Contemporary Japanese Animation. By Susan J. Napier” in The Journal of Asian Studies , 61(2), 2002, pp. 727–729. 2 . Key texts relevant to these thinkers are as follows: Gilles Deleuze, Cinema I and Cinema II (London: Athlone Press, 1989); Jacques Ranciere, The Future of the Image (London and New York: Verso, 2007); Brian Massumi, Parables for the Virtual: Movement Affect, Sensation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002); Slavoj Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (London and New York: Verso, 1989); Steven Shaviro, The Cinematic Body (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993). 3 . This is a recurrent theme in The Anime Machine – and although Lamarre has a carefully nuanced approach to the significance of technology, he ultimately favours an engagement with the specificity of the technology as the primary starting point for an analysis of the “animetic” image: see Lamarre, 2009: xxi–xxiii. 4 . For a concise summing up of this point and a discussion of the distinction between creation and “fabrication” see Collingwood, 1938: pp. 128–131. 5 . Lamarre is strident critic of such tendencies – see The Anime Machine , p. xxviii & p. 89. 6 . “Culturalism” is used here to denote approaches to artistic products and artefacts that prioritize indigenous traditions and practices as a means to explain the artistic rationale of the content. While it is a valuable exercise in contextualization, there are limits to how it can account for creative processes themselves. 7 . Shimokawa Ōten produced Imokawa Mukuzo Genkanban no Maki (The Tale of Imokawa Mukuzo the Concierge ) which was the first animated work to be shown publicly – the images were retouched on the celluloid.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Report Los Angeles, CA
    Los Angeles County Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Board Report Los Angeles, CA File #: 2016-0527, File Type: Program Agenda Number: 9. PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 SUBJECT: OPEN STREETS GRANT PROGRAM ACTION: APPROVE OPEN STREETS GRANT PROGRAM - CYCLE TWO RECOMMENDATION CONSIDER awarding and programming a total of $4.14 million for Cycle Two (2) of the Open Streets Grant Program per the Metro Board Motion 72 (Attachment A) and programmatic support as follows: A. AWARDING $4.04 million to 17 new Open Street events scheduled through December 2018 (Attachment B-1); B. PROGRAMMING the Cycle One (1) 626 Golden Street event with up to $200,000 of supplemental funds to execute the event due to postponement from the June Reservoir and Fish fires. The costs to stage the 626 Golden Streets event will not exceed the $393,600 amount as was originally allocated by the Board; and C. REPROGRAMMING $100,000 from canceled Cycle One Open Street event Car Free Carson towards Cycle Two. ISSUE In September 2013 the Metro Board approved the Open Streets Competitive Grant Program framework to fund a series of regional car-free events in response to the June 2013 Board Motion 72. The approved framework includes the following: · An annual allocation up to $2 million. · Competitive process and program. · Technical process to collect data and evaluate the events. In March 2016 The Metro Board approved initiation of Cycle Two of the Open Streets Grant Program (Attachment C). The Cycle Two recommendation includes funding for 17 new events and supplemental programmatic elements per the June 2013 Motion 72, for a total of $4.14 million over 2.5 fiscal years.
    [Show full text]
  • Anime in America, Disney in Japan: the Global Exchange of Popular Media Visualized Through Disney’S “Stitch”
    Anime in America, Disney in Japan: The Global Exchange of Popular Media Visualized through Disney’s “Stitch” Nicolette Lucinda Pisha Asheville, North Carolina Bachelor of Arts, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2008 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College^oEWilliam and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts American Studies Program The College of William and Mary January, 2010 APPROVAL PAGE This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts NicoletteAucinda Pisha Approved ®y the £r, 2009 Associate Professor Arthur Knight, American Studies and English The College of William and Mary,, Visiting Assistant Professor Timothy Barnard, American Studies The College of William and Mary Assistant Professor Hiroshi Kitamura, History The College of William and Mary ABSTRACT PAGE My thesis examines the complexities of Disney’s Stitch character, a space alien that appeals to both American and Japanese audiences. The substitutive theory of Americanization is often associated with the Disney Company’s global expansion; however, my work looks at this idea as multifaceted. By focusing on the Disney Company’s relationship with the Japanese consumer market, I am able to provide evidence of instances when influence from the local Japanese culture appears in both Disney animation and products. For example, Stitch contains many of the same physical characteristics found in both Japanese anime and manga characters, and a small shop selling local Japanese crafts is located inside the Tokyo Disneyland theme park. I completed onsite research at Tokyo Disneyland and learned about city life in Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle River Main Office 11471 Business Blvd Eagle River
    POST OFFICE NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE EAGLE RIVER MAIN OFFICE 11471 BUSINESS BLVD EAGLE RIVER AK 99577 HUFFMAN 1221 HUFFMAN PARK DR ANCHORAGE AK 99515 DOWNTOWN STATION 315 BARNETTE ST FAIRBANKS AK 99701 KETCHIKAN MAIN OFFICE 3609 TONGASS AVE KETCHIKAN AK 99901 MIDTOWN STATION 3721 B ST ANCHORAGE AK 99503 WASILLA MAIN OFFICE 401 N MAIN ST WASILLA AK 99654 ANCHORAGE MAIN OFFICE 4141 POSTMARK DR ANCHORAGE AK 99530 KODIAK MAIN OFFICE 419 LOWER MILL BAY RD KODIAK AK 99615 PALMER MAIN OFFICE 500 S COBB ST PALMER AK 99645 COLLEGE BRANCH 755 FAIRBANKS ST FAIRBANKS AK 99709 MENDENHALL STATION 9491 VINTAGE BLVD JUNEAU AK 99801 SYLACAUGA MAIN OFFICE 1 S BROADWAY AVE SYLACAUGA AL 35150 SCOTTSBORO POST OFFICE 101 S MARKET ST SCOTTSBORO AL 35768 ANNISTON MAIN OFFICE 1101 QUINTARD AVE ANNISTON AL 36201 TALLADEGA MAIN OFFICE 127 EAST ST N TALLADEGA AL 35160 TROY MAIN OFFICE 1300 S BRUNDIDGE ST TROY AL 36081 PHENIX CITY MAIN OFFICE 1310 9TH AVE PHENIX CITY AL 36867 TUSCALOOSA MAIN OFFICE 1313 22ND AVE TUSCALOOSA AL 35401 CLAYTON MAIN OFFICE 15 S MIDWAY ST CLAYTON AL 36016 HOOVER POST OFFICE 1809 RIVERCHASE DR HOOVER AL 35244 MEADOWBROOK 1900 CORPORATE DR BIRMINGHAM AL 35242 FLORENCE MAIN OFFICE 210 N SEMINARY ST FLORENCE AL 35630 ALBERTVILLE MAIN OFFICE 210 S HAMBRICK ST ALBERTVILLE AL 35950 JASPER POST OFFICE 2101 3RD AVE S JASPER AL 35501 AUBURN MAIN OFFICE 300 OPELIKA RD AUBURN AL 36830 FORT PAYNE POST OFFICE 301 1ST ST E FORT PAYNE AL 35967 ROANOKE POST OFFICE 3078 HIGHWAY 431 ROANOKE AL 36274 BEL AIR STATION 3410 BEL AIR MALL MOBILE AL 36606
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Encounters of Fantasy and Punishment in the Deadman Wonderland Anime
    Online Journal of Art and Design volume 3, issue 3, 2015 Spatial Encounters of Fantasy and Punishment in the Deadman Wonderland Anime Dr. Deniz Balık DokuzEylül University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper intends to contribute to the interdisciplinary studies of architectural discourse and anime as an art form.Being not limited to pure visual aesthetics and entertainment per se, anime narratives engage with theory by using characters and architectural spaces as a means to make social, political, and philosophical critique. As a case study, this paper focuses on the Japanese anime series Deadman Wonderland (2011), and argues that the architectural design in this anime is a deliberate maneuver to intensify the intended connotations and symbolic meanings, rather than being merely casual background settings and enrichments for the narrative. It is indicated that the anime uses the particular motif of amusement park as the primary metaphor of fantasy, and the specific motif of prison as the ideal metaphor of punishment.Drawing close associations with the views of Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard, and Louis Marin, this paper uses the narratives of prison and amusement park as a tool tounfoldthe concepts of power relations, social anxiety, uncanny, repression of trauma and memory. Keywords: Architectural design, anime, cinematic narrative, amusement park, prison, Tokyo. INTRODUCTION Within the context of cinematic fiction and image, architecture plays a major role in transferring the narrative to audience in various scales, ranging from a city silhouette to an interior space design. Architecture contributes to cinematic atmosphere, as it helps the audience to be absorbed into the frames of space/time.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Mta Divisions Locations Stations 073009
    METRO DIVISIONS, LOCATIONS, TERMINALS FACILITY CODE NAME Address City State Zip DIVISIONS - LOCATIONS - TERMINALS DIVISION 0001 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 1130 E. 6TH ST LOS ANGELES CA 90021 DIVISION 0002 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 720 E. 15TH ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90021 DIVISION 0003 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 630 W. AVENUE 28 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 DIVISION 0004 NON-REVENUE VEHICLE DIVISION 7878 TELEGRAPH RD. DOWNEY CA 90240 DIVISION 0005 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 5425 VAN NESS AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90062 DIVISION 0006 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 100 SUNSET AVE. VENICE CA 90291 DIVISION 0007 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 8800 SANTA MONICA BLVD. LOS ANGELES CA 90069 DIVISION 0008 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 9201 CANOGA AVE. CHATSWORTH CA 91311 DIVISION 0009 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 3449 SANTA ANITA AVE. EL MONTE CA 91731 DIVISION 0010 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 742 N. MISSION RD. LOS ANGELES CA 90033 DIVISION 0011 BLUE LINE MAIN YARD 4350 E. 208th ST. LONG BEACH CA 90810 DIVISION 0012 INACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 970 W. CHESTER PL. LONG BEACH CA 90813 LOCATION 0014 SOUTH PARK SHOPS 5413 AVALON BLVD. LOS ANGELES CA 90011 DIVISION 0015 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 11900 BRANFORD ST. SUN VALLEY CA 91352 TERMINAL 0017 MAPLE LOT - BUS LAYOVER 632 MAPLE AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90014 DIVISION 0018 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 450 W. GRIFFITH ST. GARDENA CA 90248 TERMINAL 0019 EL MONTE STATION 3501 SANTA ANITA AVE. EL MONTE CA 91731 DIVISION 0020 RED LINE MAIN YARD 320 SO. SANTA FE AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90013 DIVISION 0021 PASADENA GOLD LINE YARD(MIDWAY) 1800 BAKER ST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Commodore Forgotten, but Not Lost: Matthew C. Perry in American History and Memory, 1854-2018
    The Great Commodore Forgotten, but not Lost: Matthew C. Perry in American History and Memory, 1854-2018 By Chester J. Jones Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program May 2020 The Great Commodore Forgotten, but not Lost: Matthew C. Perry in American History and Memory, 1854-2018 Chester J. Jones I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: ____________________________________ Chester J. Jones, Student Date Approvals: __________________________________ Dr. Amy Fluker, Thesis Advisor Date __________________________________ Dr. Brian Bonhomme, Committee Member Date __________________________________ Dr. David Simonelli, Committee Member Date __________________________________ Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date Abstract Commodore Matthew Perry was impactful for the United States Navy and the expansion of America's diplomacy around the world. He played a vital role in negotiating the 1854 Treaty of Kanagawa, which established trade between the United States and Japan, and helped reform the United States Navy. The new changes he implemented, like schooling and officer ranks, are still used in modern America. Nevertheless, the memory of Commodore Matthew Perry has faded from the American public over the decades since his death. He is not taught in American schools, hardly written about, and barely remembered by the American people. The goal of this paper is to find out what has caused Matthew Perry to disappear from America's public memory.
    [Show full text]