DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Macrobert Award Winner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2016 MacRobert Award winner he 2016 winner of the MacRobert Award, the longest- evening. Professor Danielle George, Professor of Microwave running and most prestigious prize for innovation in UK Communication Engineering at the University of Manchester, Tengineering, was announced at this year’s annual Awards received the Rooke Award for her remarkable contribution to the Dinner on 23 June at the Pavilion at the Tower of London. The public promotion of engineering through her work with various winner, Blatchford, was honoured with a gold medal for its media channels, such as presenting the engineering-themed intelligent prosthetic limb innovation and the team members Royal Institution Christmas Lecture series in 2014. The Major shared a cash prize of £50,000. Known for spotting the ‘next big Project Award was presented to a team from BAE Systems’ AI Labs thing’ in the technology sector, the MacRobert Award identifies for its Intermediate Frequency Modem System project. The Prince outstanding innovation with proven commercial success and Philip Medal, the Academy’s highest individual accolade, went to tangible social benefit. Dr Jonathan Ingram for his groundbreaking work on BIM (building information modelling). Blatchford, which was up against automotive engineering giant Jaguar Land Rover and MRI scanner pioneers Siemens Magnet The Silver Medals, which recognise outstanding personal Technology, has developed the first ever prosthetic limb with contributions to engineering in the early stage of careers, were integrated robotic control of the knee and foot; a system in which presented to Dr Damian Gardiner, Technical Manager at Tracerco, the parts work together like a human leg. Where previously Dr Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of DeepMind and Vice lower leg prosthetics wearers had to plan their days meticulously President Engineering at Google, and Professor Tong Sun, according to the limitations of terrain they could tackle, the smart Professor of Sensor Engineering at City University London. robotics in the Linx limb system constantly monitor and adapt to the wearer’s movements and the environment, giving users much The first RAEng Engineers Trust Young Engineers of the Year greater confidence and freedom. awards were presented to Dr Sithamparanathan Sabesan from the University of Cambridge, Dr T Ben Britton from Imperial HRH The Princess Royal and Academy President Professor College London, John Collins from Arup, Orla Murphy of Jaguar Dame Ann Dowling OM DBE FREng FRS presented the prize Land Rover, and Dr Paul Shearing from University College London. to the winning team: Professor Saeed Zahedi OBE FREng, Established with the generous support of the Worshipful Technical Director; Nadine Stech, Senior Control Engineer; Company of Engineers, these are awarded to UK engineers in Andy Sykes, Principal Electronic Engineer; Dr David Moser, full-time higher education, research or industrial employment, Principal Mechatronic Engineer; and Rob Painter, Senior who have demonstrated excellence in the early stage of their Mechanical Engineer. careers. Dr Sabesan went on to win the Sir George Macfarlane Medal for his work in electronic engineering and as a co-founder Dr Dame Sue Ion DBE FREng FRS, Chair of the MacRobert Award of technology company PervasID. judging panel, said: “Blatchford has combined a compassionate approach to patient needs with huge ambition and exceptional The Academy’s awards evening was made possible through systems engineering. The team behind this incredible innovation the support of headline sponsor Atkins and silver sponsors are true role models who show the positive impact that BAE Systems, BP, GKN, Jaguar Land Rover, Lockheed Martin and engineering can have on society.” Petrofac. The MacRobert Award is supported by the Worshipful Company of Engineers. A number of other Academy awards that celebrate and recognise engineers who have made a remarkable contribution over the The MacRobert Award 2016 winning team from Blatchford receives the gold course of their careers were also presented throughout the medal from HRH The Princess Royal and Professor Dame Ann Dowling President’s column 2 Academy roundup 10 Newsletter Innovation and entrepreneurship 3 News of Fellows 11 Infrastructure and transport 4 Obituaries 12 Summer 2016 Technology and society 5 People and talent 6 1 President's 11 June 2016 marked the 40th anniversary will be positive or negative for the future of the Fellowship of Engineering, which of the country, one thing we can all agree column would later become the Royal Academy on is that negotiations in coming months of Engineering. In 1976, 130 of the UK’s and years must be informed by a clear finest engineers came together with understanding of the potential solutions, a shared purpose: to define and lead opportunities and risks from the perspective best practice within engineering, and to of UK engineering. We need to ensure that promote engineering to those outside that the UK maintains its position as a the profession. centre of world-class engineering research and innovation and that it provides the Forty years on, the Academy’s commitment environment for the creation and growth to these two goals is stronger than of successful engineering businesses. As ever. Less than a fortnight after the an Academy, we are taking up the request 40th anniversary, we hosted our annual from the 38 organisations representing Awards Dinner, now the highlight of the the engineering profession, through the Academy calendar and a time when we Engineering the Future policy group, to celebrate and reward some of the very provide a coordinated source of engineering best engineering and engineers in the information and expertise for government. UK today. I am always humbled by the This advice needs to be representative of talent and innovation recognised, from the whole profession. the winner of the Prince Philip Medal Dr Meetings and visitors Jonathan Ingram, in recognition of his We want to ensure that engineering In her capacity as President, Dame Ann exceptional contribution to engineering, businesses, large and small, feature has met with: to an engineer at the opposite end of his strongly in the industrial strategy and Dr Jeremy Farrar OBE FRS, Director of career, the Sir George MacFarlane medal can access the talented workforce they Wellcome Trust winner Dr Sithamparanathan Sabesan, need. The higher education and research Kelly Gillis, Associate Deputy Minister at for demonstrating excellence less than community has benefited significantly Canada’s Department for Innovation, Science and Economic Development 10 years since graduating from a first from EU funding and is understandably Earl of Selborne GB FRS DL degree in engineering. concerned about the uncertainty resulting Juergen Maier, CEO of Siemens UK from the vote to leave. This follows on The highlight of the evening for me is National Academy of Technologies of France: from a planned re-organisation of the always the presentation of the MacRobert Alain Bugat, President; Bruno Revellin- UK funding for research and innovation: Award – the UK’s premier award for Falcoz, Honorary President; Olivier Appert, ahead of the referendum, the government General Delegate; and Jacques Lukasik, innovation. This award has consistently launched the Higher Education Bill, which Secretary General of Euro-CASE. recognised and celebrated technologies my review of business-university research Professor Hiroshi Amano, Nobel Laureate that go on to have a transformational collaborations helped to inform. The plans Paul Dreschler CBE, Chairman of the CBI impact on society. This year’s winner, Lord Sainsbury included the establishment of a new body, Blatchford, has achieved something truly Koji Omi, Founder and Chairman of the STS UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), to remarkable that is now making such forum bring greater coherence to research and a difference to amputees worldwide. Steve Holliday FREng, Executive Director of innovation funding. National Grid Congratulations to all of our winners. Jo Johnson, Minister of State for Universities While the Academy has expressed concerns This year’s Awards Dinner fell on National and Science about the status of Innovate UK within Women in Engineering Day. It was an honour Professor Sir Robert Lechler, President, this new body, the vote to leave the EU and Dr Helen Munn, Executive Director, and a privilege to be recognised in a list means that having a strong integrated Academy of Medical Sciences of the UK’s top 50 women in engineering, voice for research and innovation will be Wang Zhongwei, Chairman of the alongside many other Academy Fellows more important than ever. I will continue to Counsellors’ Office of the State Council, and friends, which was published jointly by People’s Republic of China discuss how the creation of UKRI can best the Women’s Engineering Society and the Koji Tsuruoka, Ambassador of Japan to the UK support this with Jo Johnson, Minister of Daily Telegraph on the day. In 1976, none Naoto Nishida, Corporate Executive Vice State for Universities and Science. President and Head of Technology, Toshiba of the founding Fellows were female. With She attended the following events and 70 brilliant female engineers in our current 23 June will shape the future of UK meetings: Fellowship, we are making steps forwards. engineering in ways that it will be impossible to predict. I am proud of the Prince Philip Designers Prize Award There was of course a bigger event in the Academy, its partner institutions and the Commons Science and Technology diary on the same day. This year’s dinner engineering profession as a whole for their Committee – Higher Education and coincided with an unprecedented shift in Research Bill quick response to the referendum result the relationship between the UK and its Council for Science and Technology and the leadership the community has continental neighbours: on 23 June, the Top 50 Women in Engineering breakfast shown in uniting to support government in launch British public voted to leave the European securing the best outcome for the UK. Many Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering Union (EU).
Recommended publications
  • Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties

    Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties

    ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology
  • Annual Review 2010 - 2011 Introduction

    Annual Review 2010 - 2011 Introduction

    ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - 2011 INTRODUCTION ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE YEAR by Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, President and Vice-Chancellor This Annual Review covers the first full year of indicator of our international standing and applied research and skills training for the varied my tenure as President and Vice-Chancellor. It competitiveness. In the 2011 Rankings, we rose needs of the nuclear industry”, but that is has been an eventful year in which the six places on the year to 38th position – a rise of strictly outside of the scope of this review – so University has celebrated many achievements some 40 places since the merger in 2004 when more of that in the next Annual Review. and made good progress on many fronts, the Victoria University of Manchester was despite the very fast-changing and uncertain ranked in 78th position. On the broader research front, our Research external environment. Grant and Contract (RGC) income rose very The highlight of the University’s achievements in slightly compared with recent years. In part, this It is a real tribute to my colleagues from across 2010-11 was undoubtedly the award of the is a reflection of the fact that RGC funding is the campus that, despite the obvious external Nobel Prize for Physics to Professor Andre Geim coming under increasing pressure from public pressures, the University ends this turbulent year and Professor Konstantin Novoselov for their funding austerity, but we also acknowledge that with a continuing focus on our strategic pioneering work on graphene, which was we are not performing quite as well as our priorities and in such a healthy financial state.
  • Smutty Alchemy

    Smutty Alchemy

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work.
  • Year in Review

    Year in Review

    Year in review For the year ended 31 March 2017 Trustees2 Executive Director YEAR IN REVIEW The Trustees of the Society are the members Dr Julie Maxton of its Council, who are elected by and from Registered address the Fellowship. Council is chaired by the 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace President of the Society. During 2016/17, London SW1Y 5AG the members of Council were as follows: royalsociety.org President Sir Venki Ramakrishnan Registered Charity Number 207043 Treasurer Professor Anthony Cheetham The Royal Society’s Trustees’ report and Physical Secretary financial statements for the year ended Professor Alexander Halliday 31 March 2017 can be found at: Foreign Secretary royalsociety.org/about-us/funding- Professor Richard Catlow** finances/financial-statements Sir Martyn Poliakoff* Biological Secretary Sir John Skehel Members of Council Professor Gillian Bates** Professor Jean Beggs** Professor Andrea Brand* Sir Keith Burnett Professor Eleanor Campbell** Professor Michael Cates* Professor George Efstathiou Professor Brian Foster Professor Russell Foster** Professor Uta Frith Professor Joanna Haigh Dame Wendy Hall* Dr Hermann Hauser Professor Angela McLean* Dame Georgina Mace* Dame Bridget Ogilvie** Dame Carol Robinson** Dame Nancy Rothwell* Professor Stephen Sparks Professor Ian Stewart Dame Janet Thornton Professor Cheryll Tickle Sir Richard Treisman Professor Simon White * Retired 30 November 2016 ** Appointed 30 November 2016 Cover image Dancing with stars by Imre Potyó, Hungary, capturing the courtship dance of the Danube mayfly (Ephoron virgo). YEAR IN REVIEW 3 Contents President’s foreword .................................. 4 Executive Director’s report .............................. 5 Year in review ...................................... 6 Promoting science and its benefits ...................... 7 Recognising excellence in science ......................21 Supporting outstanding science .....................
  • EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering

    EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering

    EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering A report prepared for EPSRC and STFC by a panel chaired by Dr Sue Ion Table of Contents Summary 3 Recommendations 4 1 Introduction 6 2 Review of the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK 8 3 Identification of the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in application areas related to nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 11 4 Comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver relevant skills and expertise 14 5 Identification of changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK 19 6 UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision 21 7 Other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 22 Appendix A: Biographies of Panel Members 23 Appendix B: List of Acronyms used in the Report 27 2 Summary EPSRC and STFC initiated this review of nuclear physics and nuclear engineering with the following terms of reference: • To review the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK • To identify the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in related application areas • To comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver these skills and expertise • To identify any changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK • To comment on UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision • To comment on any other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering The review has revealed a number of critical interests, not all of which are the preserve of the Research Councils, but which are reflected in the recommendations made herein.
  • FST 36 Cover.Indd

    FST 36 Cover.Indd

    fst journal The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology Volume 20, Number 6, July 2011 Sir John Enderby: The dilemma of science and research funding Research funding Sir Adrian Smith: Allocating science and research funding Professor Malcolm Grant: New funding realities mean changing priorities Dr Patrick Vallance: The future of the UK pharmaceuticals industry Fukushima Sir John Beddington: The importance of scientific advice in disaster response Professor Nick Pidgeon: Public attitudes to nuclear power Professor Laurence Williams: The design of nuclear power stations Dr Mike Weightman: The implications for the UK The digital revolution Professor Michael Fourman: Can Scotland grasp the opportunities? John McClelland: ICT in the public sector Rashik Parmar: The promise of IT innovation Biofuels Dr Bernie Bulkin: Achieving the renewable energy target James Primrose: The global growth in biofuels Sam Cockerill: Biorefining in the UK Professor Douglas Kell: Carbon dioxide – an age-old problem T H E F O U N D A T I O N F O R S C I E N C E A N D fs t TE C H N O L O G Y THE FOUNDATION The Foundation for Science and Technology FOR SCIENCE AND 10 Carlton House Terrace TECHNOLOGY London fst SW1Y 5AH THE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Telephone Registered Charity No: 274727. A Company Limited by Guarantee No: 1327814 020 7321 2220 PRESIDENT Fax The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding FRSE 020 7321 2221 Email VICE PRESIDENTS [email protected] The Earl of Shannon COUNCIL Editor CHAIRMAN Sir John Enderby CBE FRS The Earl
  • Annual Review 2013-2014

    Annual Review 2013-2014

    ANNUAL REVIEW 2013/2014 Strategic priorities Contents As the UK’s national academy for engineering, we bring together the most successful and talented ANNUAL REVIEW engineers from across the engineering sectors for a shared purpose: to advance and promote excellence in engineering. We provide analysis and policy support to promote the UK’s role as a great place from Strategic priorities inside front cover which to do business. We take a lead on engineering education and we invest in the UK’s world class research base to underpin innovation. We work to improve public awareness and understanding of Forewords 2 engineering. We are a national academy with a global outlook and use our international partnerships to ensure that the UK benefits from international networks, expertise and investment. Drive faster and more balanced economic growth 4 The Academy’s programmes are driven by four strategic challenges, each of which provides a key contribution to a strong and vibrant engineering sector and to the health and wealth of society. Foster better education and skills 8 Lead the profession 12 Drive faster and more balanced Foster better education and skills economic growth The strategic challenge is to create a system of Promote engineering at the heart of society 16 The strategic challenge is to improve the capacity engineering education and training that satisfies of UK entrepreneurs and enterprises to create the aspirations of young people while delivering Building organisational capacity 20 innovative products and services, increase wealth the high-calibre engineers and technicians that and employment and rebalance the economy in businesses need.
  • EPSRC Annual Report and Accounts 2008€“2009 HC

    EPSRC Annual Report and Accounts 2008€“2009 HC

    PIONEERING RESEARCH AND SKILLS Annual report and accounts 2008–2009 EPSRC ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2008–2009 Presented to Parliament pursuant to s. 2 (2) of Schedule 1 of the Science and Technology Act 1965 (c.4) Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20th July 2009 HC 801 London: The Stationery Office £19.15 CONTENTS 03 Chairman’s foreword 60 Annual accounts: 04 Chief Executive’s introduction 61 Remuneration report 64 Statement of account Management commentary: 73 Notes to the accounts 06 Healthy research base 08 Delivering high-quality research 16 Next generation skills 24 Access to the best 26 Economic and social impact 28 Impact from excellence 31 Skills for the economy 33 Exploitation of research 37 Challenges for society and the economy 44 Facts and figures 54 Corporate activities © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to: Office of Public Sector Information Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 9780102961119 ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL 02 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2008 – 2009 PIONEERING RESEARCH AND SKILLS JOHN ARMITT CHAIRMAN In accordance with Schedule 1 to the This year we have chosen a new phrase conclusions were positive in identifying excellence Science and Technology Act 1965, the ‘Pioneering research and skills’ as part of our in all EPSRC-related areas, adding further Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council submits the following logo.

  • On 18 March 2013, the First Queen Elizabeth Prize

    QueenQueen ElizabethElizabeth PrizePrize n 18 March 2013, the first Queen Elizabeth Prize for for engineering that has had global Engineering was awarded to five pioneering and impact on humanity. The Prime Oextraordinary individuals. Dr Robert Kahn, Dr Vinton Cerf, Minister, Rt Hon David Cameron Louis Pouzin, Sir Tim Berners-Lee FREng and Marc Andreessen were MP, said: “The Internet and announced as the winners of the £1 million prize for collectively and the World Wide Web … are collaboratively creating one of the most complex and exceptional engineering innovations that systems imaginable: the Internet and the World Wide Web. The have enabled new industries, announcement was made by Chair of the Prize Foundation, Lord a huge number of jobs and Browne of Madingley, in the presence of HRH The Princess Royal. enabled the world and its people to access information The distinguished panel of international judges made their decision and knowledge as never before.” at a meeting on 13 March, chaired by Lord Alec Broers FREng and including Professor Lynne Gladden FREng and Paul Westbury The announcement of the winners generated worldwide coverage FREng. This followed a long and detailed process over the preceding in print, radio, broadcast and social media channels, reaching months involving two groups of Academy Fellows – the search millions of people across many different countries, contributing to group who encouraged nominations from across the world and the one of the main objectives of the Prize – to raise the profile of sifting group who sorted through hundreds of nominations. engineering and emphasize its importance to society. Vinton Cerf described this succinctly: “The Queen Elizabeth Prize for The Internet and the World Wide Web have revolutionised the Engineering is a stunning and welcomed recognition of the power way we communicate and access information and are integral to of engineering to effect change.” the lives of over 2 billion people worldwide.
  • THE FUTURE of NUCLEAR ENERGY in the UK Birmingham Policy Commission the Report July 2012 2 the Future of Nuclear Energy in the UK

    THE FUTURE of NUCLEAR ENERGY in the UK Birmingham Policy Commission the Report July 2012 2 the Future of Nuclear Energy in the UK

    THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY IN THE UK Birmingham Policy Commission The Report July 2012 2 The Future of Nuclear Energy in the UK Foreword by the Chair of the Commission It was a great honour to have been invited to chair this policy commission for the University of Birmingham. This is a critical time for the UK to get its energy policy right as we face the twin challenges of climate change and energy security. Historically nuclear energy has had a significant role in the UK and could continue to do so in the decades ahead. But this is by no means inevitable and, as a former minister for energy, I am more than aware of the complexities involved in getting energy policy right now and for future generations. The current report looks at challenges facing the UK in terms of building up its nuclear programme. It examines technology, financing, safety and waste issues, supply chain potential, workforce requirements and R&D. Our report makes clear that unless the Government shows a decisive lead and creates the right conditions for investment in the UK, the country risks losing out on its huge potential for developing a new nuclear industry. The University of Birmingham has a long and established track record working in the areas of de-commissioning, health monitoring and residual life prediction for existing nuclear power stations, dating back to the first phase of nuclear construction in the 1950s. Birmingham has also made significant contributions in metallurgy and materials in the study of the extension of the lifetime of reactor materials; important contributions have also been made in the field of radiation damage to nuclear materials.
  • Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136

    Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136

    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2013 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2013. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Harald Ade Takaaki Akaike Heather Allen Ariel Amir Scott Aaronson Karen Adelman Katerina Akassoglou Icarus Allen Ido Amit Stuart Aaronson Zach Adelman Arne Akbar John Allen Angelika Amon Adam Abate Pia Adelroth Erol Akcay Karen Allen Hubert Amrein Abul Abbas David Adelson Mark Akeson Lisa Allen Serge Amselem Tarek Abbas Alan Aderem Anna Akhmanova Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Jonathan Abbatt Neil Adger Shizuo Akira Paul Allen Esther Amstad Shahal Abbo Noam Adir Ramesh Akkina Philip Allen I. Jonathan Amster Patrick Abbot Jess Adkins Klaus Aktories Toby Allen Ronald Amundson Albert Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Muhammad Alam James Allison Katrin Amunts Geoff Abbott Roee Admon Eric Alani Mead Allison Myron Amusia Larry Abbott Walter Adriani Pietro Alano Isabel Allona Gynheung An Nicholas Abbott Ruedi Aebersold Cedric Alaux Robin Allshire Zhiqiang An Rasha Abdel Rahman Ueli Aebi Maher Alayyoubi Abigail Allwood Ranjit Anand Zalfa Abdel-Malek Martin Aeschlimann Richard Alba Julian Allwood Beau Ances Minori Abe Ruslan Afasizhev Salim Al-Babili Eric Alm David Andelman Kathryn Abel Markus Affolter Salvatore Albani Benjamin Alman John Anderies Asa Abeliovich Dritan Agalliu Silas Alben Steven Almo Gregor Anderluh John Aber David Agard Mark Alber Douglas Almond Bogi Andersen Geoff Abers Aneel Aggarwal Reka Albert Genevieve Almouzni George Andersen Rohan Abeyaratne Anurag Agrawal R. Craig Albertson Noga Alon Gregers Andersen Susan Abmayr Arun Agrawal Roy Alcalay Uri Alon Ken Andersen Ehab Abouheif Paul Agris Antonio Alcami Claudio Alonso Olaf Andersen Soman Abraham H.
  • Knowledge, Networks and Nations

    Knowledge, Networks and Nations

    The Royal Society For further information nations and networks Knowledge, The Royal Society is a Fellowship of more than 1400 outstanding The Royal Society individuals from all areas of science, mathematics, engineering and Science Policy Centre medicine, who form a global scientific network of the highest calibre. The 6–9 Carlton House Terrace Fellowship is supported by over 140 permanent staff with responsibility for London SW1Y 5AG the day-to-day management of the Society and its activities. The Society T +44 (0)20 7451 2500 encourages public debate on key issues involving science, engineering F +44 (0)20 7451 2692 and medicine, and the use of high quality scientific advice in policymaking. E [email protected] We are committed to delivering the best independent expert W royalsociety.org advice, drawing upon the experience of the Society’s Fellows and Foreign Members, the wider scientific community and relevant stakeholders. We are working to achieve five strategic priorities: • Invest in future scientific leaders and in innovation • Influence policymaking with the best scientific advice • Invigorate science and mathematics education • Increase access to the best science internationally The Royal Society Royal The • Inspire an interest in the joy, wonder and excitement of scientific discovery March 2011 March Knowledge, networks and nations ISBN 978-0-85403-890-9 03/11 report Centre Policy Science ISBN: 978-0-85403-890-9 Issued: March 2011 Report 03/11 DES2096 Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century Founded