EPSRC Annual Report and Accounts 2008€“2009 HC
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Evidencing the Impact of Neighbourhood Watch
UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science Evidencing the impact of Neighbourhood Watch Evidencing the impact of Neighbourhood Watch Lisa Tompson, Jyoti Belur and Nikola Giorgiou University College London Contact details: Dr Lisa Tompson Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ. Tel: 020 3108 3126 Email: [email protected] 1 UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science Evidencing the impact of Neighbourhood Watch Table of Contents 1. Background ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Methods .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. The impact of Neighbourhood Watch ................................................................................... 4 3.1 How Neighbourhood Watch might impact on crime ................................................................. 5 3.1.1 Manipulating the environment to reduce opportunities for crime........................................ 5 Dissemination of crime prevention advice .......................................................................................... 6 Mobilising guardians .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Social control mechanisms ................................................................................................... -
Annual Report
Annual Report 2003/2004 The academic year 2003/2004 was marked by continued excellence in research, teaching and outreach, in service of humanity’s intellectual, social and technological needs. President and Provost’s Outreach Statement In accordance with its UCL is committed to founding principles, UCL using its excellence in continued to share the research and teaching highest quality research to enrich society’s art, and teaching with those intellectual, cultural, who could most benefit scientific, economic, from it, regardless of environmental and their background or medical spheres. circumstances. See page 2 See page 8 Research & Teaching Achievements UCL continued to UCL’s academics challenge the boundaries conducted pioneering of knowledge through its work at the forefront programmes of research, of their disciplines while ensuring that the during this year. most promising students See page 12 could benefit from its intense research-led teaching environment. See page 4 The UCL Community Developing UCL UCL’s staff, students, With the help of its alumni and members of supporters, UCL is Council form a community investing in facilities which works closely fit for the finest research together to achieve and teaching in decades the university’s goals. to come. See page 18 See page 24 Contacting UCL Supporting UCL Join the many current UCL pays tribute to and former students and those individuals and staff, friends, businesses, organisations who funding councils and have made substantial agencies, governments, financial contributions foundations, trusts and in support of its research charities that are and teaching. involved with UCL. See page 22 See page 25 Financial Information UCL’s annual income has grown by almost 30 per cent in the last five years. -
A Systematic Review Protocol for Crime Trends Facilitated by Synthetic Biology Mariam Elgabry1,2 , Darren Nesbeth2 and Shane D
Elgabry et al. Systematic Reviews (2020) 9:22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1284-1 PROTOCOL Open Access A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology Mariam Elgabry1,2 , Darren Nesbeth2 and Shane D. Johnson1* Abstract Background: When new technologies are developed, it is common for their crime and security implications to be overlooked or given inadequate attention, which can lead to a ‘crime harvest’. Potential methods for the criminal exploitation of biotechnology need to be understood to assess their impact, evaluate current policies and interventions and inform the allocation of limited resources efficiently. Recent studies have illustrated some of the security implications of biotechnology, with outcomes of misuse ranging from compromised computers using malware stored in synthesised DNA, infringement of intellectual property on biological matter, synthesis of new threatening viruses, ‘genetic genocide,’ and the exploitation of food markets with genetically modified crops. However, there exists no synthesis of this information, and no formal quality assessment of the current evidence. This review therefore aims to establish what current and/or predicted crimes have been reported as a result of biotechnology. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted to identify relevant literature. ProQuest, Web of Science, MEDLINE and USENIX will be searched utilizing a predefined search string, and Backward and Forward searches. Grey literature will be identified by searching the official UK Government website (www.gov.uk) and the Global database of Dissertations and Theses. The review will be conducted by screening title/abstracts followed by full texts, utilising pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers will be managed using Eppi-center Reviewer 4 software, and data will be organised using a data extraction table using a descriptive coding tool. -
Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties
ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology -
Testing a Geospatial Predictive Policing Strategy
TESTING A GEOSPATIAL PREDICTIVE POLICING STRATEGY: APPLICATION OF ARCGIS 3D ANALYST TOOLS FOR FORECASTING COMMISSION OF RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES By SOLMAZ AMIRI A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF DESIGN WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY School of Design and Construction DECEMBER 2014 © Copyright by SOLMAZ AMIRI, 2014 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by SOLMAZ AMIRI, 2014 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation/thesis of SOLMAZ AMIRI find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ___________________________________ Kerry R Brooks, Ph.D., Chair ___________________________________ Bryan Vila, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Kenn Daratha, Ph.D. ___________________________________ David Wang, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee for their guidance, understanding, patience and support during my studies at Washington State University. I would like to gratefully and sincerely thank Dr. Kerry Brooks for accepting to direct this dissertation. Dr. Brooks introduced me to the fields of geographic information systems and scientific studies of cities, and helped me with every aspect of my research. He asked me questions to help me think harder, spent endless time reviewing and proofreading my papers and supported me during the difficult times in my research. Without his encouragements, continuous guidance and insight, I could not have finished this dissertation. I am grateful to Dr. Bryan Vila for joining my committee. Dr. Vila put a great deal of time to help me understand ecology of crime and environmental criminology. I showed up at his office without having scheduled a prior appointment, and he was always willing to help. -
POLICY IMPACT UNIT: OUR FIRST TWO YEARS Policy Impact Unit: Our Frst Two Years Policy Impact Unit: Our Frst Two Years | 1
POLICY IMPACT UNIT: OUR FIRST TWO YEARS Policy Impact Unit: Our frst two years Policy Impact Unit: Our frst two years | 1 FOREWORDS Forewards 1 PIU in numbers: the frst two years 2 About the PIU 3 Our approach 4 Why engineers? 6 Why STEaPP? 7 The team 8 Credit: Shaun Waldie Summary of activity 9 At UCL, generating positive societal impacts is central to In 1827, UCL founded the frst laboratory in the world Highlights 10 our mission of being a world-leading research university. devoted to engineering education. Over 190 years later, we The value of our academic excellence lies in how we are are still at the cutting edge of the discipline, home to some Gender and the Internet of Things 11 able to inform and infuence the world around us, from of the most successful engineering departments in the UK. Future Targeted Healthcare Manufacturing Hub 14 academic impact to impact on policy professionals and the At its heart, engineering is about fnding practical solutions Vax-Hub 16 global community. In transforming discovery into practice, to problems. Our aim is to change the world and our Dawes Centre for Future Crime 18 we are able to fulfl our mission of being a force for good researchers are tackling some of the world’s biggest Neuromorphic Computing 20 and enabling people to live healthier, more sustainable lives. problems – from improving medical treatments, to tackling climate change, to keeping people safe online. Of course, Other activities 22 Our institutional Public Policy Strategy sets out our vision this year, the COVID-19 pandemic has been an important Training 22 for embedding public policy engagement across UCL focus for many researchers across the faculty and the role Pilot projects 22 in order to bring cross-disciplinary expertise to bear on of science and engineering advice to government has been Global Policy Fellows 22 public policy challenges. -
Annual Review 2010 - 2011 Introduction
ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - 2011 INTRODUCTION ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE YEAR by Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, President and Vice-Chancellor This Annual Review covers the first full year of indicator of our international standing and applied research and skills training for the varied my tenure as President and Vice-Chancellor. It competitiveness. In the 2011 Rankings, we rose needs of the nuclear industry”, but that is has been an eventful year in which the six places on the year to 38th position – a rise of strictly outside of the scope of this review – so University has celebrated many achievements some 40 places since the merger in 2004 when more of that in the next Annual Review. and made good progress on many fronts, the Victoria University of Manchester was despite the very fast-changing and uncertain ranked in 78th position. On the broader research front, our Research external environment. Grant and Contract (RGC) income rose very The highlight of the University’s achievements in slightly compared with recent years. In part, this It is a real tribute to my colleagues from across 2010-11 was undoubtedly the award of the is a reflection of the fact that RGC funding is the campus that, despite the obvious external Nobel Prize for Physics to Professor Andre Geim coming under increasing pressure from public pressures, the University ends this turbulent year and Professor Konstantin Novoselov for their funding austerity, but we also acknowledge that with a continuing focus on our strategic pioneering work on graphene, which was we are not performing quite as well as our priorities and in such a healthy financial state. -
Youth and Policy, No
YOUTH &POLICY No. 108 MARCH 2012 Young People, Welfare Reform and Social Insecurity Buses from Beirut: Young People, Bus Travel and Anti-Social Behaviour Participation and Activism: Young people shaping their worlds John Dewey and Experiential Learning: Developing the theory of youth work Home Alone? Practitioners’ Reflections on the Implications of Young People Living Alone Thinking Space: An Institute for Youth Work? Reviews Editorial Group Ruth Gilchrist, Tracey Hodgson, Tony Jeffs, Dino Saldajeno, Mark Smith, Jean Spence, Naomi Stanton, Tania de St Croix, Tom Wylie. Associate Editors Priscilla Alderson, Institute of Education, London Sally Baker, The Open University Simon Bradford, Brunel University Judith Bessant, RMIT University, Australia Lesley Buckland, YMCA George Williams College Bob Coles, University of York John Holmes, Newman College, Birmingham Sue Mansfield, University of Dundee Gill Millar, South West Regional Youth Work Adviser Susan Morgan, University of Ulster Jon Ord, University College of St Mark and St John Jenny Pearce, University of Bedfordshire John Pitts, University of Bedfordshire Keith Popple, London South Bank University John Rose, Consultant Kalbir Shukra, Goldsmiths, University of London Tony Taylor, IDYW Joyce Walker, University of Minnesota, USA Aniela Wenham, University of York Anna Whalen, Freelance Consultant Published by Youth & Policy, ‘Burnbrae’, Black Lane, Blaydon Burn, Blaydon on Tyne NE21 6DX. www.youthandpolicy.org Copyright: Youth & Policy The views expressed in the journal remain those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editorial group. Whilst every effort is made to check factual information, the Editorial Group is not responsible for errors in the material published in the journal. ii Youth & Policy No. -
Lucia Summers Title: Assistant Professor
TEXAS STATE VITA I. Academic/Professional Background A. Name: Lucia Summers Title: Assistant professor B. Educational Background Degree Year University Major Thesis/Dissertation Ph.D. 2012 UCL, University Criminology The role of place in of London, UK outdoor serious violence P.G.Cert. 2006 University of East Learning and Teaching London, UK in Higher Education M.Sc. 2003 UCL, University Research Methods in The effect of a memory of London, UK Psychology load on self-control in non-autistic adults M.Sc. 2002 University of Applied Forensic Public attitudes toward Leicester, UK Psychology (by different types of sex distance learning) offenders B.Sc.(Hons) 1999 University of Experimental Variations of frontal lobe Sussex, UK Psychology cognitive function across the menstrual cycle C. University Experience Position University Dates Assistant Director, Texas State University Oct 2013 - date GII Center Assistant Professor Texas State University Sep 2013 - date Lecturer Texas State University Sep 2012 – Aug 2013 Researcher (0.6-0.8 fte) University College London, UK Mar 2003 - Sep 2011 Senior Lecturer (0.2 fte) University of East London, UK Apr 2002 - Jul 2008 Specialist Lecturer in University of East London, UK Sep 2002 - Jan 2007 Research Methods (0.2-0.4 fte) Postgraduate Teaching University College London, UK Sep 2002 - Feb 2003 Assistant fte = full-time equivalent Page 1 of 22 D. Relevant Professional Experience Position Entity Dates Research Methods and Self-employed Oct 2004 - date Statistics Consultant Forensic Mental Health East London and The City NHS Trust, Jul 2001 - Feb 2002 Care Assistant London, UK Support Worker East London and The City NHS Trust, Feb 2000 - Jul 2001 (Mental Health) London, UK Psychiatric Nursing East London and The City NHS Trust, Nov 1999 - Feb 2000 Assistant London, UK Rehabilitation Assistant Headway Hurstwood Park, Lewes, UK Jun 1998 - Sep 1999 (voluntary position) Psychiatric Nursing South Downs NHS Trust, Brighton, UK Jun 1998 - Sep 1999 Assistant Nursing Assistant Blue Arrow Nursing Agency Feb 1998 - Jun 1998 E. -
Smutty Alchemy
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work. -
Year in Review
Year in review For the year ended 31 March 2017 Trustees2 Executive Director YEAR IN REVIEW The Trustees of the Society are the members Dr Julie Maxton of its Council, who are elected by and from Registered address the Fellowship. Council is chaired by the 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace President of the Society. During 2016/17, London SW1Y 5AG the members of Council were as follows: royalsociety.org President Sir Venki Ramakrishnan Registered Charity Number 207043 Treasurer Professor Anthony Cheetham The Royal Society’s Trustees’ report and Physical Secretary financial statements for the year ended Professor Alexander Halliday 31 March 2017 can be found at: Foreign Secretary royalsociety.org/about-us/funding- Professor Richard Catlow** finances/financial-statements Sir Martyn Poliakoff* Biological Secretary Sir John Skehel Members of Council Professor Gillian Bates** Professor Jean Beggs** Professor Andrea Brand* Sir Keith Burnett Professor Eleanor Campbell** Professor Michael Cates* Professor George Efstathiou Professor Brian Foster Professor Russell Foster** Professor Uta Frith Professor Joanna Haigh Dame Wendy Hall* Dr Hermann Hauser Professor Angela McLean* Dame Georgina Mace* Dame Bridget Ogilvie** Dame Carol Robinson** Dame Nancy Rothwell* Professor Stephen Sparks Professor Ian Stewart Dame Janet Thornton Professor Cheryll Tickle Sir Richard Treisman Professor Simon White * Retired 30 November 2016 ** Appointed 30 November 2016 Cover image Dancing with stars by Imre Potyó, Hungary, capturing the courtship dance of the Danube mayfly (Ephoron virgo). YEAR IN REVIEW 3 Contents President’s foreword .................................. 4 Executive Director’s report .............................. 5 Year in review ...................................... 6 Promoting science and its benefits ...................... 7 Recognising excellence in science ......................21 Supporting outstanding science ..................... -
EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering
EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering A report prepared for EPSRC and STFC by a panel chaired by Dr Sue Ion Table of Contents Summary 3 Recommendations 4 1 Introduction 6 2 Review of the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK 8 3 Identification of the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in application areas related to nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 11 4 Comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver relevant skills and expertise 14 5 Identification of changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK 19 6 UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision 21 7 Other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 22 Appendix A: Biographies of Panel Members 23 Appendix B: List of Acronyms used in the Report 27 2 Summary EPSRC and STFC initiated this review of nuclear physics and nuclear engineering with the following terms of reference: • To review the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK • To identify the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in related application areas • To comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver these skills and expertise • To identify any changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK • To comment on UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision • To comment on any other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering The review has revealed a number of critical interests, not all of which are the preserve of the Research Councils, but which are reflected in the recommendations made herein.