Annual Review 2013-2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties
ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology -
Annual Review 2010 - 2011 Introduction
ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - 2011 INTRODUCTION ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE YEAR by Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, President and Vice-Chancellor This Annual Review covers the first full year of indicator of our international standing and applied research and skills training for the varied my tenure as President and Vice-Chancellor. It competitiveness. In the 2011 Rankings, we rose needs of the nuclear industry”, but that is has been an eventful year in which the six places on the year to 38th position – a rise of strictly outside of the scope of this review – so University has celebrated many achievements some 40 places since the merger in 2004 when more of that in the next Annual Review. and made good progress on many fronts, the Victoria University of Manchester was despite the very fast-changing and uncertain ranked in 78th position. On the broader research front, our Research external environment. Grant and Contract (RGC) income rose very The highlight of the University’s achievements in slightly compared with recent years. In part, this It is a real tribute to my colleagues from across 2010-11 was undoubtedly the award of the is a reflection of the fact that RGC funding is the campus that, despite the obvious external Nobel Prize for Physics to Professor Andre Geim coming under increasing pressure from public pressures, the University ends this turbulent year and Professor Konstantin Novoselov for their funding austerity, but we also acknowledge that with a continuing focus on our strategic pioneering work on graphene, which was we are not performing quite as well as our priorities and in such a healthy financial state. -
Saice Administration File
SAICE National Office Organigram SAICE ADMINISTRATION FILE Quick reference document for SAICE Branches, Divisions, Student Chapters, Panels, Boards and Council 1 DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION RECORD Document Approved By SIGNATURE _______________________________ NAME ____________________________________ AUTHORITY_______________________________ Copy Name of Organisation Date Issuer Number Recipient 1 Manglin Pillay SAICE SAICE NO 2 Steven Kaplan SAICE SAICE NO 3 SAICE NO 4 SAICE NO 5 SAICE NO 6 SAICE NO 7 SAICE NO SAICE ADMINISTRATION FILE Revision 2018 Date compiled 6 April 2018 Compiled by SAICE National Office 2 SAICE National Office Organigram CONTENTS 1. SAICE Structure and National Office Organigram ................................................................................ 4 2. Year Programme .................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Presidential Branch Visits ..................................................................................................................... 10 4. Constitution (2017) ............................................................................................................................... 14 5. By-Laws (2017) ..................................................................................................................................... 28 6. Standard Branch and Division Rules ................................................................................................... 43 7. Student Chapters -
Smutty Alchemy
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work. -
6405 ARM AR04 Master
Annual report and accounts 2004 and accounts Annual report ARM Holdings plc Annual report and accounts 2004 Contents 2 ARM at a glance 4 Chairman’s statement 6 Chief Executive Officer’s review of operations 8 Review of operations/at home 10 Review of operations/at work 12 Review of operations/on the move 14 Operating and financial review 18 Directors and advisers 20 Corporate governance/UK GAAP 23 Corporate social responsibility/UK GAAP 25 Directors’ report/UK GAAP 27 Remuneration report/UK GAAP 34 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 35 Independent auditors’ report to the members of ARM Holdings plc/UK GAAP 36 Consolidated profit and loss account/UK GAAP Statement of Group total recognised gains and losses/UK GAAP 37 Consolidated balance sheet/UK GAAP 38 Company balance sheet/UK GAAP 39 Consolidated cash flow statement/UK GAAP 40 Notes to the financial statements/UK GAAP 64 Selected consolidated financial data/US GAAP 65 Operating and financial review and prospects/US GAAP 70 Consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income/US GAAP 71 Consolidated balance sheets/US GAAP 72 Consolidated statements of cash flows/US GAAP 73 Consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity/US GAAP 74 Notes to the financial statements/US GAAP 91 Report of independent registered public accounting firm/US GAAP 92 Group directory The ARM® architecture lies at the heart of advanced digital products: it enables leading electronics companies to develop reliable total systems solutions for a wide range of applications which are used at home, at work and on the move. During 2004 we increased our ability to meet our Partners’ needs when we acquired Artisan, a designer of physical intellectual property (IP), and Axys, which provides electronic system level design tools. -
Year in Review
Year in review For the year ended 31 March 2017 Trustees2 Executive Director YEAR IN REVIEW The Trustees of the Society are the members Dr Julie Maxton of its Council, who are elected by and from Registered address the Fellowship. Council is chaired by the 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace President of the Society. During 2016/17, London SW1Y 5AG the members of Council were as follows: royalsociety.org President Sir Venki Ramakrishnan Registered Charity Number 207043 Treasurer Professor Anthony Cheetham The Royal Society’s Trustees’ report and Physical Secretary financial statements for the year ended Professor Alexander Halliday 31 March 2017 can be found at: Foreign Secretary royalsociety.org/about-us/funding- Professor Richard Catlow** finances/financial-statements Sir Martyn Poliakoff* Biological Secretary Sir John Skehel Members of Council Professor Gillian Bates** Professor Jean Beggs** Professor Andrea Brand* Sir Keith Burnett Professor Eleanor Campbell** Professor Michael Cates* Professor George Efstathiou Professor Brian Foster Professor Russell Foster** Professor Uta Frith Professor Joanna Haigh Dame Wendy Hall* Dr Hermann Hauser Professor Angela McLean* Dame Georgina Mace* Dame Bridget Ogilvie** Dame Carol Robinson** Dame Nancy Rothwell* Professor Stephen Sparks Professor Ian Stewart Dame Janet Thornton Professor Cheryll Tickle Sir Richard Treisman Professor Simon White * Retired 30 November 2016 ** Appointed 30 November 2016 Cover image Dancing with stars by Imre Potyó, Hungary, capturing the courtship dance of the Danube mayfly (Ephoron virgo). YEAR IN REVIEW 3 Contents President’s foreword .................................. 4 Executive Director’s report .............................. 5 Year in review ...................................... 6 Promoting science and its benefits ...................... 7 Recognising excellence in science ......................21 Supporting outstanding science ..................... -
EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering
EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering A report prepared for EPSRC and STFC by a panel chaired by Dr Sue Ion Table of Contents Summary 3 Recommendations 4 1 Introduction 6 2 Review of the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK 8 3 Identification of the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in application areas related to nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 11 4 Comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver relevant skills and expertise 14 5 Identification of changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK 19 6 UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision 21 7 Other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 22 Appendix A: Biographies of Panel Members 23 Appendix B: List of Acronyms used in the Report 27 2 Summary EPSRC and STFC initiated this review of nuclear physics and nuclear engineering with the following terms of reference: • To review the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK • To identify the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in related application areas • To comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver these skills and expertise • To identify any changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK • To comment on UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision • To comment on any other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering The review has revealed a number of critical interests, not all of which are the preserve of the Research Councils, but which are reflected in the recommendations made herein. -
FST 36 Cover.Indd
fst journal The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology Volume 20, Number 6, July 2011 Sir John Enderby: The dilemma of science and research funding Research funding Sir Adrian Smith: Allocating science and research funding Professor Malcolm Grant: New funding realities mean changing priorities Dr Patrick Vallance: The future of the UK pharmaceuticals industry Fukushima Sir John Beddington: The importance of scientific advice in disaster response Professor Nick Pidgeon: Public attitudes to nuclear power Professor Laurence Williams: The design of nuclear power stations Dr Mike Weightman: The implications for the UK The digital revolution Professor Michael Fourman: Can Scotland grasp the opportunities? John McClelland: ICT in the public sector Rashik Parmar: The promise of IT innovation Biofuels Dr Bernie Bulkin: Achieving the renewable energy target James Primrose: The global growth in biofuels Sam Cockerill: Biorefining in the UK Professor Douglas Kell: Carbon dioxide – an age-old problem T H E F O U N D A T I O N F O R S C I E N C E A N D fs t TE C H N O L O G Y THE FOUNDATION The Foundation for Science and Technology FOR SCIENCE AND 10 Carlton House Terrace TECHNOLOGY London fst SW1Y 5AH THE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Telephone Registered Charity No: 274727. A Company Limited by Guarantee No: 1327814 020 7321 2220 PRESIDENT Fax The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding FRSE 020 7321 2221 Email VICE PRESIDENTS [email protected] The Earl of Shannon COUNCIL Editor CHAIRMAN Sir John Enderby CBE FRS The Earl -
Displaced & Urbanized
Displaced & Urbanized Or Why We Build By Suhaib Bhatti A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Architecture (Water) Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 ©Suhaib Bhatti 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii iv Abstract I embarked on this research with the aim to study the relationship between the city and the flood, understanding the waterfront as some blurred edge where wild and human forces mix. My hope was to propose a design strategy for urban waterfronts, which define a critical border between the order of the city and the chaotic, disruptive force of the flood. Initially, I wanted to outline some toolkit which could be applied to the unique conditions of any urban waterfront of the world. It became clear that I would need to choose a site amongst hundreds of cases, otherwise my brief studies of the globe’s urban watersheds would remain relatively shallow. For a number of anomalous reasons, I settled on the Indus Valley and its watershed, together composing one of Earth’s most violent landscapes. The more I studied the valley for symptoms, like a doctor looking for the underlying conditions of a place, the more I realized that the kind of design method I initially hoped to uncover would be impossible. -
2016 Macrobert Award Winner
2016 MacRobert Award winner he 2016 winner of the MacRobert Award, the longest- evening. Professor Danielle George, Professor of Microwave running and most prestigious prize for innovation in UK Communication Engineering at the University of Manchester, Tengineering, was announced at this year’s annual Awards received the Rooke Award for her remarkable contribution to the Dinner on 23 June at the Pavilion at the Tower of London. The public promotion of engineering through her work with various winner, Blatchford, was honoured with a gold medal for its media channels, such as presenting the engineering-themed intelligent prosthetic limb innovation and the team members Royal Institution Christmas Lecture series in 2014. The Major shared a cash prize of £50,000. Known for spotting the ‘next big Project Award was presented to a team from BAE Systems’ AI Labs thing’ in the technology sector, the MacRobert Award identifies for its Intermediate Frequency Modem System project. The Prince outstanding innovation with proven commercial success and Philip Medal, the Academy’s highest individual accolade, went to tangible social benefit. Dr Jonathan Ingram for his groundbreaking work on BIM (building information modelling). Blatchford, which was up against automotive engineering giant Jaguar Land Rover and MRI scanner pioneers Siemens Magnet The Silver Medals, which recognise outstanding personal Technology, has developed the first ever prosthetic limb with contributions to engineering in the early stage of careers, were integrated robotic control of the knee and foot; a system in which presented to Dr Damian Gardiner, Technical Manager at Tracerco, the parts work together like a human leg. Where previously Dr Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of DeepMind and Vice lower leg prosthetics wearers had to plan their days meticulously President Engineering at Google, and Professor Tong Sun, according to the limitations of terrain they could tackle, the smart Professor of Sensor Engineering at City University London. -
Financial Report & Accounts
Financial Report & Accounts For the year ended 31 March 2018 Contents Page Chair of the Finance Committee’s statement 1 Report of Trustee Board Reference and administrative details 2 Structure, governance and management 3 Election to the Trustee Board 3 Induction and training of Trustee Board members 3 Internal control 4 Objectives and activities for the public benefit 6 Charitable activities 6 Activities, achievements and performance 6 Financial review 10 Review of transactions for the year 10 Academy’s reserves policy 11 Recipients of Academy grants 12 Grant-making policy 13 Remuneration policy 13 Plans for future periods 14 Statement of Trustee Board’s responsibilities 14 Independent auditor’s report to the Trustee Board of the Royal Academy of Engineering 15 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated statement of financial activities 17 Balance sheets 18 Consolidated statement of cash flows 19 Notes to the accounts 20-34 Chair of the Finance Committee’s statement young people; 13% on promotion leasehold improvements to Prince of and leadership in engineering; Philip House. The main liability and 5% on leading and shaping was a bank loan of £11.5 million, engineering policy. Employment costs which funded the extension of the increased from the previous year by Academy’s property lease secured 13% to £5.7 million due to additional in 2017. The loan also funded part recruitment to deliver programmes of the lower ground floor extension such as the Global Challenges and settled the previous loan with Research Fund and Investment in NatWest. The value of the group’s Research Talent. restricted funds increased over the year by £0.4 million. -
DEPARTMENT of ENGINEERING NEWS Cambridge Engineers Break Superconductor World Record Page 3
AUTUMN 2014 ISSUE 16 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING NEWS Cambridge engineers break superconductor world record Page 3 Google Award for the Automatic Statistician Page 8 The James Dyson Foundation donates £8m to University of Cambridge Page 18 In this issue Welcome Cambridge engineers break 3 superconductor world record From Graduation to the Crossrail project 4 Lifting the lid on silicon batteries 5 Solar powered home-lighting in India 6 Royal Academy backing for 7 Department research Google Award for the Automatic 8 Statistician Robogals 9 Professor William (Bill) Fitzgerald 9 The ‘visuomotor binding’ mechanism 10 Carbon nanotubes find real 11 world applications Professor David Cardwell takes over from Professor Dame Ann Dowling who led the Institute of Manufacturing 12-13 Design Show Department for five years. Ann is now President of the RAEng, while continuing in the Department with her research and teaching. International mobile ticketing success 14 3D printing – The shape of things 15 “Ann Dowling is a hard act to follow. She has left the Department in excellent shape on all fronts. to come? Our rankings, financial performance and growth have been outstanding,” says David. “Trojan horse” treatment 16 New Centres for Doctoral Studies 17 The Department now has over 180 academics and principal investigator status researchers, over 1200 undergraduates, over 800 graduate students, over 260 postdoctoral researchers and Backing Britain – The James Dyson 18 Foundation donates £8m a turnover exceeding GBP70m. It is one of the world’s top ranked engineering departments jockeying for leadership at the top of the board. Teaching has also stormed forward winning New James Dyson Building 19 for Engineering to be a live accolades from reviewers in the accreditation process.