DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Review 2013-2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013/2014 Strategic priorities Contents As the UK’s national academy for engineering, we bring together the most successful and talented ANNUAL REVIEW engineers from across the engineering sectors for a shared purpose: to advance and promote excellence in engineering. We provide analysis and policy support to promote the UK’s role as a great place from Strategic priorities inside front cover which to do business. We take a lead on engineering education and we invest in the UK’s world class research base to underpin innovation. We work to improve public awareness and understanding of Forewords 2 engineering. We are a national academy with a global outlook and use our international partnerships to ensure that the UK benefits from international networks, expertise and investment. Drive faster and more balanced economic growth 4 The Academy’s programmes are driven by four strategic challenges, each of which provides a key contribution to a strong and vibrant engineering sector and to the health and wealth of society. Foster better education and skills 8 Lead the profession 12 Drive faster and more balanced Foster better education and skills economic growth The strategic challenge is to create a system of Promote engineering at the heart of society 16 The strategic challenge is to improve the capacity engineering education and training that satisfies of UK entrepreneurs and enterprises to create the aspirations of young people while delivering Building organisational capacity 20 innovative products and services, increase wealth the high-calibre engineers and technicians that and employment and rebalance the economy in businesses need. Academy event highlights 22 favour of productive industry. Promote engineering at the Academy publications 23 Lead the profession heart of society The strategic challenge is to harness the collective The strategic challenge is to improve public Highlights of the year by theme 24 expertise, energy and capacity of the engineering understanding of engineering, increase awareness profession to enhance the UK’s economic and of how engineering impacts on lives and increase social development. public recognition for our most talented engineers. Annex 26 The Royal Academy of Engineering Incorporated by Royal Charter View the online version of the Annual Review along with the full Financial Report and Accounts at: www.raeng.org.uk/about/annrev HRH The Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh KG KT OM GBE Senior Fellow HRH The Princess Royal KG KT GCVO QSO Royal Fellow HRH The Duke of Kent KG GCMG GCVO Royal Fellow Sir John Parker GBE FREng President Contents 1 Forewords There has been a significant change Our international relations have Fellows can be justifiably proud of our excellence in UK engineering. This of attitude within government in seen significant development with role and achievements but we cannot year, we enjoyed the breathtaking recognising the value of engineering active collaboration with The Chinese slacken our pace. We have much more setting of London’s Battersea Power President in furthering wealth creation and Academy of Engineering and a to do to ensure that engineering is Chief Executive Station, thanks to support from jobs. The work of our Fellowship has renewed focus on working with our recognised at the heart of society Atkins, BAE Systems, Bosch, BP, JLR made a significant contribution to this European and US counterparts. Our and that engineering becomes the and Petrofac. The event took place and to the wider recognition of the work to support engineering capacity aspirational career of choice for our in the presence of Royal Fellow HRH role of professional engineering in UK and innovation in sub-Saharan young people. The Princess Royal and, in keeping society; we must now ensure that this Africa has been strengthened by the with the theme, was addressed by the opportunity translates into a significant creation of partnerships between In nominating Professor Dame Ann Chancellor of the Exchequer. rise in the number of young people universities and local industry in Dowling FREng to succeed me as choosing engineering as a career. A Zimbabwe and Dar es Salaam and President from September 2014, the The generosity of our Fellows, more united front with EngineeringUK, the launch of our Africa Prize for Council has chosen an outstanding donors and sponsors resulted in over supported by the professional Engineering Innovation. engineer to take our Academy forward £3.7 million in new commitments for institutions, is a must for the future. into this ever-changing but fascinating education, engagement and capital This year, we have made great strides world of global engineering challenges. projects. The Academy is enormously I have also been supported by the in developing a national forum for I wish all possible success and good grateful for the support we receive, services of a very capable and engineering in our refurbished wishes for Dame Ann and each of our which is crucial to the development of dedicated staff team, led by our Chief headquarters building. Our programme Fellows for the years ahead. the organisation and the growth in our Executive, Philip Greenish CBE. I am of events and meetings has brought impact and influence. grateful to them and have truly valued in a wide range of audiences, opinion Finally, I wish to place on record my their support. leaders and policymakers as well thanks to the Academy’s Senior The Academy constantly strives to as representatives from academia Fellow, HRH The Prince Philip, Duke improve the processes and systems Our natural alignment with business and industry. of Edinburgh. It was his deep interest that underpin all our work and is In September 2014, I shall step down and industry creates valuable in engineering that helped establish The Academy’s strengths lie in its essential to improve performance as President after just over three years partnerships that drive a programme of Following a review of governance, the Fellowship of Engineering in 1976; Fellowship and the partnerships forged and efficiency. I am deeply grateful in office. It has been a great honour. world-class engineering research. This the Council agreed recommendations since then, his enthusiastic, unflagging across the engineering profession, to those Fellows who have provided In this role, I have had the privilege of in turn brings the promise of creative to bring the Academy’s structure support has helped transform the business and industry and the wider their time and expertise in key areas working with some remarkable and new technology-driven businesses. and ways of working into line organisation into the fully fledged engineering community. of management. Their leadership and highly distinguished engineers to Our new Enterprise Hub provides with best practice. The Fellowship national academy it is today. It is with support for such projects is invaluable. develop the Academy’s strengths and a growing spectrum of support to voted to amend the Academy’s a great sense of pride that we named During the year, we led joint work pursue our mission. entrepreneurial researchers who Charter, Statutes and Regulations our building Prince Philip House in across the profession to influence A major programme to modernise the want to develop and commercialise accordingly, firstly at an Extraordinary honour of his role as Senior Fellow. education policy in areas most relevant Academy’s processes for managing We have seen considerable progress their brilliant innovations. The most General Meeting in April 2014 and to the formation of engineers. We grants and awards has established across all our strategic objectives, with valuable element is access to the subsequently by postal ballot. The Sir John Parker GBE FREng reviewed and then led the design of much-improved practice through the Academy having direct impacts on expertise and mentorship provided by outcome of that vote means that the President schools curricula in both computing and a new IT-based system and clearer government policy in education and Fellows who have deep experience of Academy will now move to a structure design and technology. This has had lines of accountability across all the skills where we have made a significant successful start-ups. More than 100 that will be in line with modern a direct and lasting impact on young schemes that involve the distribution contribution. The Academy’s work has of our Fellows have offered their very governance and support our ambitions people’s connection with engineering of funds. influenced policy and promoted debate valuable expertise to assist in creating for the future. concepts at school. on issues including the energy system, tomorrow’s companies. A root and branch review of the wind energy and the impacts of space The implementation of a review of Working with some 25 partners and Academy’s main website will, later in weather events. We have continued to work with membership will greatly enhance our supporters, the Engineering for Growth the year, provide us with a modern government to support the further process for electing new Fellows, the campaign highlighted how engineering platform for electronic communications We have built on last year’s increase development of a modern industrial lifeblood of our organisation who give supports society and the economy and services, such as the online in positive media coverage on strategy for the UK. In the aerospace the Academy some 12,000 hours through a series of events which booking of Academy events. A new set engineering matters. Some 100 million sector, the need to increase the supply of their time to provide leadership, received excellent media coverage. of functions in the Fellows’ area will people worldwide were reached by of highly skilled engineers has led to expertise and delivery. I am deeply create new ways for Fellows to engage news of the award of the first Queen industry and government funding a grateful to them all, including the Engineering for Growth was also the with the work of their Academy.
Recommended publications
  • Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties

    Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties

    ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology
  • Annual Review 2010 - 2011 Introduction

    Annual Review 2010 - 2011 Introduction

    ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - 2011 INTRODUCTION ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE YEAR by Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, President and Vice-Chancellor This Annual Review covers the first full year of indicator of our international standing and applied research and skills training for the varied my tenure as President and Vice-Chancellor. It competitiveness. In the 2011 Rankings, we rose needs of the nuclear industry”, but that is has been an eventful year in which the six places on the year to 38th position – a rise of strictly outside of the scope of this review – so University has celebrated many achievements some 40 places since the merger in 2004 when more of that in the next Annual Review. and made good progress on many fronts, the Victoria University of Manchester was despite the very fast-changing and uncertain ranked in 78th position. On the broader research front, our Research external environment. Grant and Contract (RGC) income rose very The highlight of the University’s achievements in slightly compared with recent years. In part, this It is a real tribute to my colleagues from across 2010-11 was undoubtedly the award of the is a reflection of the fact that RGC funding is the campus that, despite the obvious external Nobel Prize for Physics to Professor Andre Geim coming under increasing pressure from public pressures, the University ends this turbulent year and Professor Konstantin Novoselov for their funding austerity, but we also acknowledge that with a continuing focus on our strategic pioneering work on graphene, which was we are not performing quite as well as our priorities and in such a healthy financial state.
  • Saice Administration File

    Saice Administration File

    SAICE National Office Organigram SAICE ADMINISTRATION FILE Quick reference document for SAICE Branches, Divisions, Student Chapters, Panels, Boards and Council 1 DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION RECORD Document Approved By SIGNATURE _______________________________ NAME ____________________________________ AUTHORITY_______________________________ Copy Name of Organisation Date Issuer Number Recipient 1 Manglin Pillay SAICE SAICE NO 2 Steven Kaplan SAICE SAICE NO 3 SAICE NO 4 SAICE NO 5 SAICE NO 6 SAICE NO 7 SAICE NO SAICE ADMINISTRATION FILE Revision 2018 Date compiled 6 April 2018 Compiled by SAICE National Office 2 SAICE National Office Organigram CONTENTS 1. SAICE Structure and National Office Organigram ................................................................................ 4 2. Year Programme .................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Presidential Branch Visits ..................................................................................................................... 10 4. Constitution (2017) ............................................................................................................................... 14 5. By-Laws (2017) ..................................................................................................................................... 28 6. Standard Branch and Division Rules ................................................................................................... 43 7. Student Chapters
  • Smutty Alchemy

    Smutty Alchemy

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work.
  • 6405 ARM AR04 Master

    6405 ARM AR04 Master

    Annual report and accounts 2004 and accounts Annual report ARM Holdings plc Annual report and accounts 2004 Contents 2 ARM at a glance 4 Chairman’s statement 6 Chief Executive Officer’s review of operations 8 Review of operations/at home 10 Review of operations/at work 12 Review of operations/on the move 14 Operating and financial review 18 Directors and advisers 20 Corporate governance/UK GAAP 23 Corporate social responsibility/UK GAAP 25 Directors’ report/UK GAAP 27 Remuneration report/UK GAAP 34 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 35 Independent auditors’ report to the members of ARM Holdings plc/UK GAAP 36 Consolidated profit and loss account/UK GAAP Statement of Group total recognised gains and losses/UK GAAP 37 Consolidated balance sheet/UK GAAP 38 Company balance sheet/UK GAAP 39 Consolidated cash flow statement/UK GAAP 40 Notes to the financial statements/UK GAAP 64 Selected consolidated financial data/US GAAP 65 Operating and financial review and prospects/US GAAP 70 Consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income/US GAAP 71 Consolidated balance sheets/US GAAP 72 Consolidated statements of cash flows/US GAAP 73 Consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity/US GAAP 74 Notes to the financial statements/US GAAP 91 Report of independent registered public accounting firm/US GAAP 92 Group directory The ARM® architecture lies at the heart of advanced digital products: it enables leading electronics companies to develop reliable total systems solutions for a wide range of applications which are used at home, at work and on the move. During 2004 we increased our ability to meet our Partners’ needs when we acquired Artisan, a designer of physical intellectual property (IP), and Axys, which provides electronic system level design tools.
  • Year in Review

    Year in Review

    Year in review For the year ended 31 March 2017 Trustees2 Executive Director YEAR IN REVIEW The Trustees of the Society are the members Dr Julie Maxton of its Council, who are elected by and from Registered address the Fellowship. Council is chaired by the 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace President of the Society. During 2016/17, London SW1Y 5AG the members of Council were as follows: royalsociety.org President Sir Venki Ramakrishnan Registered Charity Number 207043 Treasurer Professor Anthony Cheetham The Royal Society’s Trustees’ report and Physical Secretary financial statements for the year ended Professor Alexander Halliday 31 March 2017 can be found at: Foreign Secretary royalsociety.org/about-us/funding- Professor Richard Catlow** finances/financial-statements Sir Martyn Poliakoff* Biological Secretary Sir John Skehel Members of Council Professor Gillian Bates** Professor Jean Beggs** Professor Andrea Brand* Sir Keith Burnett Professor Eleanor Campbell** Professor Michael Cates* Professor George Efstathiou Professor Brian Foster Professor Russell Foster** Professor Uta Frith Professor Joanna Haigh Dame Wendy Hall* Dr Hermann Hauser Professor Angela McLean* Dame Georgina Mace* Dame Bridget Ogilvie** Dame Carol Robinson** Dame Nancy Rothwell* Professor Stephen Sparks Professor Ian Stewart Dame Janet Thornton Professor Cheryll Tickle Sir Richard Treisman Professor Simon White * Retired 30 November 2016 ** Appointed 30 November 2016 Cover image Dancing with stars by Imre Potyó, Hungary, capturing the courtship dance of the Danube mayfly (Ephoron virgo). YEAR IN REVIEW 3 Contents President’s foreword .................................. 4 Executive Director’s report .............................. 5 Year in review ...................................... 6 Promoting science and its benefits ...................... 7 Recognising excellence in science ......................21 Supporting outstanding science .....................
  • EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering

    EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering

    EPSRC/STFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering A report prepared for EPSRC and STFC by a panel chaired by Dr Sue Ion Table of Contents Summary 3 Recommendations 4 1 Introduction 6 2 Review of the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK 8 3 Identification of the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in application areas related to nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 11 4 Comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver relevant skills and expertise 14 5 Identification of changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK 19 6 UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision 21 7 Other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering 22 Appendix A: Biographies of Panel Members 23 Appendix B: List of Acronyms used in the Report 27 2 Summary EPSRC and STFC initiated this review of nuclear physics and nuclear engineering with the following terms of reference: • To review the scope of RCUK funded activity and training in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering in the UK • To identify the skills and expertise with relevance to future economic impact in related application areas • To comment on the ability of the scope and volume of the current nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity to deliver these skills and expertise • To identify any changes required in the scope or priorities of the nuclear physics and nuclear engineering activity in the UK • To comment on UK competitiveness in skill and expertise provision • To comment on any other issues relating to the provision of skills in nuclear physics and nuclear engineering The review has revealed a number of critical interests, not all of which are the preserve of the Research Councils, but which are reflected in the recommendations made herein.
  • FST 36 Cover.Indd

    FST 36 Cover.Indd

    fst journal The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology Volume 20, Number 6, July 2011 Sir John Enderby: The dilemma of science and research funding Research funding Sir Adrian Smith: Allocating science and research funding Professor Malcolm Grant: New funding realities mean changing priorities Dr Patrick Vallance: The future of the UK pharmaceuticals industry Fukushima Sir John Beddington: The importance of scientific advice in disaster response Professor Nick Pidgeon: Public attitudes to nuclear power Professor Laurence Williams: The design of nuclear power stations Dr Mike Weightman: The implications for the UK The digital revolution Professor Michael Fourman: Can Scotland grasp the opportunities? John McClelland: ICT in the public sector Rashik Parmar: The promise of IT innovation Biofuels Dr Bernie Bulkin: Achieving the renewable energy target James Primrose: The global growth in biofuels Sam Cockerill: Biorefining in the UK Professor Douglas Kell: Carbon dioxide – an age-old problem T H E F O U N D A T I O N F O R S C I E N C E A N D fs t TE C H N O L O G Y THE FOUNDATION The Foundation for Science and Technology FOR SCIENCE AND 10 Carlton House Terrace TECHNOLOGY London fst SW1Y 5AH THE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Telephone Registered Charity No: 274727. A Company Limited by Guarantee No: 1327814 020 7321 2220 PRESIDENT Fax The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding FRSE 020 7321 2221 Email VICE PRESIDENTS [email protected] The Earl of Shannon COUNCIL Editor CHAIRMAN Sir John Enderby CBE FRS The Earl
  • Displaced & Urbanized

    Displaced & Urbanized

    Displaced & Urbanized Or Why We Build By Suhaib Bhatti A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Architecture (Water) Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 ©Suhaib Bhatti 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii iv Abstract I embarked on this research with the aim to study the relationship between the city and the flood, understanding the waterfront as some blurred edge where wild and human forces mix. My hope was to propose a design strategy for urban waterfronts, which define a critical border between the order of the city and the chaotic, disruptive force of the flood. Initially, I wanted to outline some toolkit which could be applied to the unique conditions of any urban waterfront of the world. It became clear that I would need to choose a site amongst hundreds of cases, otherwise my brief studies of the globe’s urban watersheds would remain relatively shallow. For a number of anomalous reasons, I settled on the Indus Valley and its watershed, together composing one of Earth’s most violent landscapes. The more I studied the valley for symptoms, like a doctor looking for the underlying conditions of a place, the more I realized that the kind of design method I initially hoped to uncover would be impossible.
  • 2016 Macrobert Award Winner

    2016 Macrobert Award Winner

    2016 MacRobert Award winner he 2016 winner of the MacRobert Award, the longest- evening. Professor Danielle George, Professor of Microwave running and most prestigious prize for innovation in UK Communication Engineering at the University of Manchester, Tengineering, was announced at this year’s annual Awards received the Rooke Award for her remarkable contribution to the Dinner on 23 June at the Pavilion at the Tower of London. The public promotion of engineering through her work with various winner, Blatchford, was honoured with a gold medal for its media channels, such as presenting the engineering-themed intelligent prosthetic limb innovation and the team members Royal Institution Christmas Lecture series in 2014. The Major shared a cash prize of £50,000. Known for spotting the ‘next big Project Award was presented to a team from BAE Systems’ AI Labs thing’ in the technology sector, the MacRobert Award identifies for its Intermediate Frequency Modem System project. The Prince outstanding innovation with proven commercial success and Philip Medal, the Academy’s highest individual accolade, went to tangible social benefit. Dr Jonathan Ingram for his groundbreaking work on BIM (building information modelling). Blatchford, which was up against automotive engineering giant Jaguar Land Rover and MRI scanner pioneers Siemens Magnet The Silver Medals, which recognise outstanding personal Technology, has developed the first ever prosthetic limb with contributions to engineering in the early stage of careers, were integrated robotic control of the knee and foot; a system in which presented to Dr Damian Gardiner, Technical Manager at Tracerco, the parts work together like a human leg. Where previously Dr Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of DeepMind and Vice lower leg prosthetics wearers had to plan their days meticulously President Engineering at Google, and Professor Tong Sun, according to the limitations of terrain they could tackle, the smart Professor of Sensor Engineering at City University London.

  • Financial Report & Accounts

    Financial Report & Accounts For the year ended 31 March 2018 Contents Page Chair of the Finance Committee’s statement 1 Report of Trustee Board Reference and administrative details 2 Structure, governance and management 3 Election to the Trustee Board 3 Induction and training of Trustee Board members 3 Internal control 4 Objectives and activities for the public benefit 6 Charitable activities 6 Activities, achievements and performance 6 Financial review 10 Review of transactions for the year 10 Academy’s reserves policy 11 Recipients of Academy grants 12 Grant-making policy 13 Remuneration policy 13 Plans for future periods 14 Statement of Trustee Board’s responsibilities 14 Independent auditor’s report to the Trustee Board of the Royal Academy of Engineering 15 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated statement of financial activities 17 Balance sheets 18 Consolidated statement of cash flows 19 Notes to the accounts 20-34 Chair of the Finance Committee’s statement young people; 13% on promotion leasehold improvements to Prince of and leadership in engineering; Philip House. The main liability and 5% on leading and shaping was a bank loan of £11.5 million, engineering policy. Employment costs which funded the extension of the increased from the previous year by Academy’s property lease secured 13% to £5.7 million due to additional in 2017. The loan also funded part recruitment to deliver programmes of the lower ground floor extension such as the Global Challenges and settled the previous loan with Research Fund and Investment in NatWest. The value of the group’s Research Talent. restricted funds increased over the year by £0.4 million.

  • DEPARTMENT of ENGINEERING NEWS Cambridge Engineers Break Superconductor World Record Page 3

    AUTUMN 2014 ISSUE 16 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING NEWS Cambridge engineers break superconductor world record Page 3 Google Award for the Automatic Statistician Page 8 The James Dyson Foundation donates £8m to University of Cambridge Page 18 In this issue Welcome Cambridge engineers break 3 superconductor world record From Graduation to the Crossrail project 4 Lifting the lid on silicon batteries 5 Solar powered home-lighting in India 6 Royal Academy backing for 7 Department research Google Award for the Automatic 8 Statistician Robogals 9 Professor William (Bill) Fitzgerald 9 The ‘visuomotor binding’ mechanism 10 Carbon nanotubes find real 11 world applications Professor David Cardwell takes over from Professor Dame Ann Dowling who led the Institute of Manufacturing 12-13 Design Show Department for five years. Ann is now President of the RAEng, while continuing in the Department with her research and teaching. International mobile ticketing success 14 3D printing – The shape of things 15 “Ann Dowling is a hard act to follow. She has left the Department in excellent shape on all fronts. to come? Our rankings, financial performance and growth have been outstanding,” says David. “Trojan horse” treatment 16 New Centres for Doctoral Studies 17 The Department now has over 180 academics and principal investigator status researchers, over 1200 undergraduates, over 800 graduate students, over 260 postdoctoral researchers and Backing Britain – The James Dyson 18 Foundation donates £8m a turnover exceeding GBP70m. It is one of the world’s top ranked engineering departments jockeying for leadership at the top of the board. Teaching has also stormed forward winning New James Dyson Building 19 for Engineering to be a live accolades from reviewers in the accreditation process.